Chapter 4 Civil Liberties Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 Civil Liberties vs. Civil Rights • Civil liberties included in the Constitution and Bill of Rights: Freedom of speech Freedom of religion Freedom to assemble peaceably • Civil rights refers to equality of rights for all under 14th Amendment Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 The Problem of The Individual vs. Society: do bans on “hate speech” hurt free speech? Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 Original Intent The theory that judges should interpret the Constitution by determining what the founders intended when they wrote it. Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 Problems with Interpreting via Original Intent • Whose intent do we use? The framers of the constitution? The state conventions? The state legislatures? What if different intents conflict? Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 Oliver Wendell Holmes argued… …that the Constitution must be interpreted “in light of our whole experience and not merely in the light of what was said a hundred years ago.” Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 Bill of Rights 1. Freedom of religion, press, and assembly 6. Rights when on trial 2. Right to bear arms 7. Common law suits 3. No quartering of troops in private homes 8. Bail; no cruel and unusual punishment 4. Unreasonable searches and seizures prohibited 9. Unremunerated rights protected: includes right to privacy 5. Rights when accused; due process clause 10. Powers reserved for states Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 4-3a Freedom of Speech Political Speech The freedom to criticize the government’s actions and policies Symbolic Speech Speech that takes the form of actions or symbols instead of words: money, American flag, burning cross Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 Highlights in the History of Free Speech 1798: The Alien and Sedition Acts made it illegal for anyone to write, speak, or publish defamatory words about the Federal Government. 1917: The Espionage Act made it illegal to interfere in any way with military activities, including recruitment or induction. 1918: The Sedition Act made it illegal to say, print, write, or publish anything that would cause contempt or scorn for the government, Constitution, flag, or the uniform of the armed forces. Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 Schenk v. U.S. Clear and Present Danger The doctrine that Congress may limit speech if it causes a clear and present danger to the interests of the country. Justice Holmes established the “clear and present danger standard.” Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 Bad Tendency Doctrine The Bad Tendency Doctrine The doctrine that speech need only be likely to lead to negative consequences, in Congress's judgment, for it to be illegal. In Abrams v. United States the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of five Russian immigrants and established the bad tendency doctrine. Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 More Highlights in the History of the Freedom of Speech 1940: Alien Registration Act made it illegal to espouse the overthrow of the government by violent means or to associate with such groups. Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 1950: The McCarran Act stated that communist groups must register with the government and must disclose names of leaders. Dennis v. United States The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of top members of the Communist Party for violations of the Alien Registration Act. The Communist Control Act of 1954 barred all communist party organizations from participating in elections. Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 In Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) the Supreme Court loosened up earlier restrictions on free speech. It established the incitement standard. The Incitement Standard The doctrine that speech must cause listeners to be likely to commit immediate illegal acts for the speech itself to be illegal. Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 Texas v. Johnson, 1989 The Supreme Court ruled 5 to 4 that burning the U.S. flag was an acceptable form of protest. A pending amendment would overturn this ruling. Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 Pentagon Papers, 1971 • Secret government documents about the Viet Nam war; evidence the government had misled Congress • Nixon Administration opposed their publication on national security grounds: prior restraint • The Court permitted publication but did NOT decide prior restraint was unconstitutional Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 4-4 The Second Amendment: The Right to Bear Arms Does the Constitution really provide for private citizens to own individual weapons? Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 The Supreme Court Rulings on the Second Amendment • 1876: U.S. v. Cruikshank—gun ownership is not a guaranteed right • 1886: Presser v. Illinois—states can ban private armies • 1939: U.S. v. Miller—2nd Amendment meant for controlling militia • 1983: Quilici v. Village of Morton Grove—a lower court ruled “We conclude that the right to keep and bear handguns is not guaranteed by the Second Amendment.” Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 Regulating Paramilitary Groups Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments set forth the rules that govern the relationship between the federal government and criminal suspects. Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 4-5a The Fourth Amendment: Search and Seizure • Plain View • Reasonable Expectation of Privacy • Exclusionary Rule • Mapp v. Ohio, 1961: illegally obtained evidence cannot be used in court. Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 Miranda Rights • Right to remain silent during questioning • Right to know that statements the suspect makes might be used against him or her • Right to speak to an attorney before questioning • Miranda v. Arizona, 1963: can overturn convictions if these rights are violated. Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 Sixth Amendment Protections Right to an Attorney Right to Confront Witnesses Right to a Jury Trial Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 Worse justice for African-Americans? • More likely than whites to be arrested • Less likely to have adequate legal counsel • Fewer African-American lawyers, judges, jurors • More likely to be convicted • More likely to go to prison • Longer sentences • More likely to be sentenced to death • More subject to felon disenfranchisement laws Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 Eighth Amendment: No “Cruel and Unusual” Punishment? • The US was the first country in the world to ban torture (“cruel and unusual punishment”) in 1791 • Supreme Court has NOT considered the death penalty to be “cruel and unusual punishment” but HAS challenged state execution procedures • Geneva Convention and US Military Code of Justice prohibit torture of prisoners Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 Roe v. Wade continues to cause an uproar and contention as the courts and the citizenry try to determine where the right to privacy begins and ends: 9th Amendment Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 Who Has Rights? • Under US Constitution, equal protection of the laws for US citizens. Excludes fetuses, non-citizens, illegal immigrants, refugees, foreign nationals, felons. • Under Declaration of Independence, “inalienable” natural rights; “all men are created equal.” • United Nations Declaration of Universal Human Rights: “All human beings are born free and equal.” Signed by US, 1948. • Under the Geneva Convention, protections for prisoners of war: food, health care, no torture, contact with Red Cross. Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 Hudson: Repression under the National Security State • Cold War suppression of Communist Party and “sympathizers” • Surveillance and infiltration of “subversive” domestic groups by FBI, including groups such as the NAACP, ACLU, Quakers, peace groups, Martin Luther King. • Use of IRS tax audits to intimidate groups • Suppression of legitimate political dissent Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 USA Patriot Act after 9/11/2001 • Broad definition of “terrorist” • Expand FBI authority and surveillance power • Secret detention of “terrorist” suspects without charges or access to an attorney • CIA and National Security agency can now spy on American citizens • Surveillance of phone calls and bank accounts without a court order Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 Status of Enemy Combatants New category of “enemy combatants” not covered by Geneva Convention for prisoners of war President has sole authority to define enemy combatants and hold them indefinitely without filing charges Physical confinement in prison at base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, or on naval vessels offshore Trial by secret military tribunals with limited access to counsel or evidence against them Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 Permitting and Justifying Torture after 9/11 • Define torture narrowly so as to permit most interrogation techniques short of “extreme” pain and suffering • No legal liability for anyone who violates torture limits • No limits on the power of the President to conduct a military campaign or defend national security • “Extreme rendition:” transport to secret CIA prisons or to countries with no limits on torture • Federal courts have dismissed lawsuits protesting rendition; unwilling to challenge executive authority Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006