Pace University
Department of Biology and Health Sciences ekipp@pace.edu

 Course Description:
This course emphasizes the interdependence of biological systems to each other and to the environment in general.
Discussions include topics such as evolution, plant and animal classification and structure, and concepts of bioethics.
Students will be expected to discuss specific issues that impact biological systems, including humans.

 Non-major course
 4 credits: 2 lecture hours and 2 laboratory hours per week
 Fulfill the University requirement of a laboratory-based science course
 Issue and project-based
 Addresses current issues in biology and bioethics
 discuss and identify ethical issues raised by new technology

• Incorporating the internet and technology is compatible with student comfort levels
• has become a preferred tool of learning
• The academic landscape is changing to accommodate technology and web-based resources
• in order to keep relevant, institutes of higher learning need to address the dynamic learning environment
• determined that college-level science courses can significantly increase scientific literacy among nonmajors

• A science education company devoted to the development, design, production, and marketing of academically aligned science laboratory kits for secondary and post secondary students and institutions worldwide.
• Small-scale experiments promote individual study
• Single-student/single-use lab kits since 1994

By using the LabPaq system, we are able to offer our students the experience of a hands-on lab with the convenience of DL.

FULL COLOR LAB MANUAL
• Comprehensive list of items in the LabPaq required for each lab
• Laboratory techniques (including cleaning and disposal)
• Detailed protocols
• Clear objectives
• Background information
• Time to be allotted to each experiment
• MSDS Sheets and Laboratory safety
• Tips for student success
• How to write a laboratory report
• Laboratory report templates to facilitate formal lab report preparation
• Though-provoking questions

 One lecture instructor
 The same text book
 Same or similar lab experiments
 Similar lab report assignments and due dates
 Similar quizzes and exams

Traditional classroom HOL students









 Laboratory Safety and Scientific
Method
Chemical Composition of Cells
Osmosis and Diffusion
Human Genetics
DNA Biology and Technology
Evidences of Evolution
Bacteria, Protists, and Fungi
Diversity: Plants
Basic Mammalian Anatomy
Ecosystems









 Laboratory Safety and Scientific
Method
Macromolecules of Life
Cell Membrane Transport
Phenotype and Genotype
Extraction of DNA
Classification of Species
The Microbiome
Plant Genetics
Primate Characteristics
Macrobiome

 What are the scientific and pedagogical benefits and challenges of using the HOL kit?
 How do the HOL impact students’ science learning outcomes?
 How do the students like the lab experiments? How do they use the kit? Do they find the protocols easy to follow?
 Do the students using the kits have a better, equal to, or lesser understanding of the course concepts as compared to traditionally taught lab students?
 What are the department and university impacts?

• Bookstore will not need to place orders for, display, or store manuals
• Students order the labpaqs directly from Hands-On Labs,
Inc. and kits with all are sent in one shipment within 5 days
• Reallocation of funds
• Decreased reliance on adjuct faculty
• Alleviate scheduling conflicts
• Reduce wear and tear on equipment and overall facility

•
• major, gender, academic status
• rate computer skills, skills using the internet, comfort level with online classes

 Weekly lab reports
 Traditional lab report style
 Answered questions pertaining to the lab protocol and concepts
 Photographs


3 lecture exams (including final)
3 lab exams (including final)




100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
PRE & POST LAB EXAM COMPARISON
37%
16%
Pre-Lab Post-Lab
Online
Traditional

• I enjoyed and learned from the DNA extraction lab.
• I really liked the DNA extraction and plant genetics labs and learned a lot from both of them.
• DNA extraction and scientific method labs were my favorites.
• The macrobiome lab was not something easily done in an urban environment.
• Loved the DNA extraction lab.
• I liked the flexibility of when I could do the labs.
• I liked the flexibility of the course and at-home learning.
• I liked that I could complete the labs when I was comfortable to do so.
• Liked the convenience of not having to be in a lab class at a specific time or day.
• The instructions and labpaq materials were well organized and useful.
• Sometimes I felt intimidated working alone on the labs.
• I enjoyed the different tools I learned to use while taking the course.
• Having the hands on experience made me more interested in the subject of biology.
• lab activities were relevant to the course and helped me develop a better understanding of biological concepts
• the labs helped me apply the basic concepts I learned in lecture

 Use developed rubric to compare students’ lab reports
 Compare grades between control and test group
 Compare exam scores in Bio 123 from 2008-2012
 Incorporate troubleshooting advice
 Modify labs based on student feedback

Literature Cited:
 Care, W.D., & Scanlan, J.M. (2001). Planning and managing the development of courses for distance delivery: Results from a qualitative study. The Online Journal of Distance Learning
Administration, 4(2).
 Carr, S. (2000). Many Professors are Optimistic on Distance Learning, Survey Finds. The Chronicle of Higher
Education, Technology.
 Culliton, B. (1989). The Dismal State of Scientific Literacy. Science. 243(4891).
 Howell, S; Williams, P; Lindsay, N. (20030. Thirty-two Trends Affecting Distance Education: An Informed Foundation for Strategic Planning. Journal of Distance Learning.
 Kariya, S. (2003). Online education expands and evolves. IEEE Spectrum (Technology, Engineering, and Science
News). 40(5):49-51.
 Miles, M; Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis, 2 nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage Publications.
 Murray, C. (2003). Study reveals shifts in digital divide for students. eSchool News (Technology News for Today’s K-
20 Educator). 36-37.
 Roach, R. (2002). Staying connected: Getting retention right is high priority for online degree programs.
Recruitment and Retention: Issues in Higher Education.
 Selingo, J. (1998 July 17). Small private colleges brace for competition from distance learning. The Chronicle of
Higher Education.