Leadership Dialogues Presentation

advertisement

LEADERSHIP DIALOGUES

Improving outcomes for all

LEADERSHIP DIALOGUES

Executive

Summary

Research project impact

Data Collection and Analysis

Leadership

Dialogues

The context or the Leadership

Dialogues

Odyssey

The

Methodological

Framework

The leadership for learning model

Outstanding teaching quality over time is facilitated by mode 2 professional learning.

generalisation heutagogy inquiry methodological pluralism mixed methods

This vision for school improvement recognises the centrality of cognitive politics to improving outcomes.

A model of leadership is needed which engages all in action focused on learning.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY cognitive politics

LEADERSHIP DIALOGUES

JANUARY 2014 - JULY 2015 collaboration dialogic school dialogue epistemology

Positioned within the mixed methods research paradigm and comprised three phases.

Active engagement and collaboration will improve teaching quality over time.

A 360º view of teaching quality over time provides an accurate measure of how a teacher is performing.

For professional learning to be effective, teachers need to be at a given level of competency.

Teacher mindset determines if a teacher can transition from RI to good teaching quality over time.

Leadership directly impacts on outcomes for all.

The key impact indicator is teaching quality over time; the focus for data collection and analysis.

Engaging all in learning will improve outcomes for all leading to the advent of the dialogic school.

mode 2 professional learning ontology teacher mindset teaching quality over time

360° view

Silcock, R. (2015) Leading Innovation: Research Paper. [Unpublished paper] Academy for

Innovation/University of West London

What does

Primary School

A need to do to improve further?

Increase the proportion of outstanding teaching.

Phase 2

Case study method

A change in context (move to Primary

School B) afforded the opportunity to employ the case study method.

Following completion of initial phase intended impact became the creation of a dialogic school.

The consideration of cultural and micro-political issues introduced further areas for research.

Phase 1

The wicked problem

CONTEXT

Office for Standards in Education (2013)

School Inspection Report: Primary School

A. URN: 131183. London: Ofsted publications

Silcock, R. (2015) Leading Innovation:

Research Paper. [Unpublished paper]

Academy for Innovation/University of

West London

What are the barriers to change in teachers requiring improvement?

How is the role of leadership integral to improving outcomes for both children and teachers?

Phase 3

The leadership for learning model

Primary pupils’ artwork unveiled at Kidbrooke by the Mayor of Greenwich ahead of construction beginning on expanded school site for Primary School B, December 2014.

HYPOTHESIS

For schools to ensure quality of teaching over time, they need to build capacity in designing learning around all learners’ needs. This shift from the school as deliverer of the curriculum for children to the school as designer of learning for all requires the engagement of all in action focused on learning.

Silcock, R. (2015) Leading Innovation: Research Paper. [Unpublished paper] Academy for Innovation/University of West London

Research project positioned within the mixed methods research paradigm.

Piecing together the evidence of teaching quality over time

A 360° view of teaching quality over time used: a strategy for evaluating impact and leadership for change.

An adaptive methodological framework which facilitated the use of multiple methods to address different phenomena.

THE METHODOLOGICAL

Mixed methods research paradigm

An assessment model using a mix of qualitative and quantitative research methods built around the tool of observation.

FRAMEWORK

Limitations of the assessment model addressed during the second and final phases by utilising content analysis.

The use of an open code to interrogate data collected secured the robustness of the assessment model.

Content analysis

Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2011) Research Methods in Education. Routledge

Horst, H., Hjorth, L. and Tacchi, J. (2012) Rethinking ethnography: An introduction. Media

International Australia, Incorporating Culture and Policy 145 (2012): 86

Silcock, R. (2014) The Case for Change: Research Paper. [Unpublished paper] Academy for

Innovation/University of West London

Silcock, R. (2014) Inquiry for Impact: Research Paper.

[Unpublished paper] Academy for Innovation/University of

West London

THE METHODOLOGICAL

FRAMEWORK

Piecing together the evidence of teaching quality over time

Silcock, R. (2014) Inquiry for Impact: Research Paper.

[Unpublished paper] Academy for Innovation/University of

West London

THE METHODOLOGICAL

FRAMEWORK

Method Evidence

Learning journey evident in books

Pupil attainment and progress data over a term and over a year

Quality of the learning environment and how it supports learning

Quality of behaviour for learning

Observation

School performance data

Photographs

Observation/

School performance data

Weakness

Will the expectation of a book scrutiny impact on the learning journey evident in books?

School performance data is based on teacher assessments and is not indicative of attitudes to learning.

Photographic evidence will only record the potential for the learning environment to support learning.

An observer in a classroom will impact on the environment.

Pupil perceptions of learning

Quality of observed teaching

Enrichment

Questionnaire

Observation

Questionnaire

Will pupils feel encouraged to be honest?

An observer in a classroom will impact on the environment.

Will stakeholders feel encouraged to be honest?

Hammersley, M. and Traianou, A. (2012) Ethics and

Educational Research. British Educational Research

Association on-line resource. Available at http://www.bera.ac.uk/ [accessed January 2014]

Silcock, R. (2014) Inquiry for Impact: Research Paper.

[Unpublished paper] Academy for

Innovation/University of West London

Silcock, R. (2015) Leading Innovation: Research

Paper. [Unpublished paper] Academy for

Innovation/University of West London

A mixed methods approach presents a risk of overlooking ethical issues given the use of qualitative and quantitative research design.

Anonymising data enables adherence to confidentiality and consent agreements and addresses broader issues of ownership and access.

Inherent subjectivity countered by multilayered understanding of the research subject provided by the researcher.

ETHICAL ISSUES

THE LEADERSHIP FOR LEARNING MODEL

THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

Leadership culture

• Tell less, ask more: the exposure of all stakeholders to inquiry, dialogue and collaboration will promote the desired culture of telling less and asking more and the corollary of relationship building

Leadership relationships

• For all stakeholders: the building of relationships underpins the success of every complex social organisation susceptible to an array of both external and internal influences, including schools

Leadership structure

• A transparent leadership structure: defines accountabilities that will fuel school improvement both internally and externally

Leadership systems

• Precise leadership systems: leadership systems present the tangible realisation of cognitive politics

Leadership learning

• Action focused on learning: all stakeholders need to be provided with the opportunity to learn which will promote critical thinking and a focus on change; a prerequisite for responding to the increased complexity of social life

Silcock, R. (2015) Leading Innovation: Research Paper. [Unpublished paper] Academy for

Innovation/University of West London

THE LEADERSHIP FOR LEARNING MODEL

THE EVIDENCE

Leadership culture

• Informed by data from the final phase of the research project which is indicative of the impact of leaders on teacher mindset and on outcomes for all stakeholders

Leadership relationships

• Supported by the data and the subsequent finding from the initial and second phase of the research project which states that active engagement for teachers within a context of personalised professional learning will lead to an improvement in teaching quality over time; teachers being able to take a lead in their professional learning

Leadership structure/Leadership systems

• Designed following the data and the subsequent finding from all phases of the research project which advocates a 360º view of teaching quality over time; supports the management of meaning and maintains the shared reality

Leadership learning

• Supported by the data and the subsequent finding from the initial and second phase of the research project which states that active engagement for teachers within a context of personalised professional learning will lead to an improvement in teaching quality over time; promotes a shared moral purpose

Silcock, R. (2015) Leading Innovation: Research Paper. [Unpublished paper] Academy for

Innovation/University of West London

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Phase 1

Identify wicked problem

Develop research methodology

Conduct research

Analyse data and determine interim findings

Phase 2

Identify case study

Develop case study methodology

Conduct case study

Analyse data and revise findings

Silcock, R. (2015) Leading Innovation: Research Paper.

[Unpublished paper] Academy for Innovation/University of

West London

Phase 3

Develop leadership for learning model and identify further areas for research to secure robustness for it

Adapt research methodology

Conduct research

Analyse data, finalise leadership for learning model and determine claims

Publish claims

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Phase

3

Timescale

January 2015 to

July 2015

 Adapt research methodology

 Conduct research

 Analyse data and determine impact

Research Project Development Plan

Key tasks Interventions Data collection

 At the level of leader

 At the level of

RI teacher

 Assessment model Piecing together the evidence of teaching quality over time

 Questionnaire

Evaluation Reporting

Yes Yes

Leading with Precision senior leadership development programme

Intensive fixed term support plan for RI teacher

Silcock, R. (2015) Leading Innovation: Research Paper.

[Unpublished paper] Academy for Innovation/University of

West London

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Phase

3

Timescale

January 2015 to

July 2015

 Adapt research methodology

 Conduct research

 Analyse data and determine impact

Research Project Development Plan

Key tasks Interventions Data collection

 At the level of leader

 At the level of

RI teacher

 Assessment model Piecing together the evidence of teaching quality over time

 Questionnaire

Evaluation Reporting

Yes Yes

Questionnaire

Silcock, R. (2015) Leading Innovation: Research Paper.

[Unpublished paper] Academy for Innovation/University of

West London

Teaching quality over time

(baseline)

Teaching quality over time

(evaluative)

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

WHAT ARE THE BARRIERS TO CHANGE IN TEACHERS REQUIRING

IMPROVEMENT?

Teacher 1

Piecing together the evidence of teaching quality over time

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Jan-15

Mar-15

Silcock, R. (2015) Leading Innovation: Research Paper.

[Unpublished paper] Academy for Innovation/University of

West London

Assessment foci

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

WHAT ARE THE BARRIERS TO CHANGE IN TEACHERS REQUIRING

IMPROVEMENT?

Teacher 2

Piecing together the evidence of teaching quality over time

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Jan-15

Mar-15

Silcock, R. (2015) Leading Innovation: Research Paper.

[Unpublished paper] Academy for Innovation/University of

West London

Assessment foci

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

HOW IS THE ROLE OF LEADERSHIP INTEGRAL TO IMPROVING

OUTCOMES FOR BOTH CHILDREN AND TEACHERS?

Attitudes to Leadership

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Vision for leadership at SR and WF

Identifiable leadership style at SR and WF

Success of a school determined by its leaders

Teacher mindset determined by leaders

Teacher mindset can be changed by leaders

Successful leaders build relationships

Leaders directly impact on teaching quality over time

Leaders directly impact on children's outcomes

Attitude

Percentage of leaders/teachers strongly agree

Percentage of leaders/teachers agree

Percentage of leaders/teachers undecided

Percentage of leaders/teachers disagree

Percentage of leaders/teachers strongly disagree

Silcock, R. (2015) Leading Innovation: Research

Paper. [Unpublished paper] Academy for

Innovation/University of West London

RESEARCH PROJECT IMPACT

CLAIMS

Leadership Dialogues research project claims

Active engagement and collaboration will improve teaching quality over time:

For professional learning to be effective, teachers need to be at a given level of competency

Teacher mindset determines if a teacher can transition from RI to good teaching quality over time.

A 360º view of teaching quality over time provides an accurate measure of how a teacher is performing.

Silcock, R. (2015) Leading Innovation:

Research Paper. [Unpublished paper]

Academy for Innovation/University of West

London

Leadership directly impacts on outcomes for all.

Successive phases of the research project have added robustness to the findings and secured generalisability.

Generalisability is evidenced in the leadership for learning model which promotes scalability and sustainability.

RESEARCH PROJECT IMPACT

LEADING CHANGE

cognitive politics collaboration dialogic school dialogue epistemology generalisation heutagogy inquiry methodological pluralism mixed methods

Scalability and sustainability further evidenced by my changing ontological perspective: I am now a more effective change agent.

Implementation of the leadership for learning model will lead to the creation of a dialogic school and address the wicked problem.

Further robustness could be added to the leadership for learning model, but this is not a barrier to using it as a blueprint for change.

This is evidenced by the continued success of

Primary School A, the early scaling of personalised

CPD and the transformation of

Primary School B.

To get involved or for a project update click on icon: mode 2 professional learning ontology teacher mindset teaching quality over time

360° view

Silcock, R. (2015) Leading Innovation: Research Paper. [Unpublished paper] Academy for

Innovation/University of West London

Term

Action Research

Case Study

Complexity Theory

Design Thinking

Dialogic School

Epistemology

Ethnography

Heutagogy

Interpretivism

Joint Practice Research

GLOSSARY

Definition

Practitioner based research focused on change at the local level.

A process or record of research into the development of a particular person, group or event which utilises the complexity of multiple variables and adopts a mixed methods approach in order to understand what is being investigated. Data collection and analysis is guided by the development of a theoretical position at the outset.

The design of minimal interventions with the purpose of effecting major change.

Reframing problems (how the problem is defined) to find overlooked solutions.

A school which promotes improved outcomes for all by employing precise, context-driven and collaborative leadership to create a professional learning environment characterised by inquiry, formal and informal dialogue and collaboration.

How knowledge is acquired.

The observation of society from the viewpoint of the research subject.

Self-determined or learner-centric learning.

An emphasis on the ability of the individual to construct meaning.

Collaborative practitioner based research focused on change at the local level.

Lead Practitioner

Methodology

Methods

Mindset

Mixed Methods Research

Mode 1 Research

Mode 2 Professional Learning

Mode 2 Research

Ontology

Paradigm

Positivism

GLOSSARY

A teacher who delivers outstanding teaching quality over time and subsequently leads colleagues to improve their practice.

The explanation for the methods used to conduct research.

The methods used to conduct research.

The fixed mental attitude or disposition which predetermines a person’s responses to and interpretations of situations.

The collecting, analysing and mixing of both quantitative and qualitative research methods to understand a research problem.

Academic, investigator-initiated and discipline-based knowledge production.

A professional learning environment characterised by inquiry, formal and informal dialogue and collaboration.

Context-driven, problem-focused and interdisciplinary knowledge production.

View of reality and being.

An overall theoretical research framework.

To prove or disprove a hypothesis.

Qualitative Research

Quantitative Research

360º view

GLOSSARY

Used to gain an understanding of underlying reasons, opinions and motivations providing insights into a problem.

The quantification of a problem by generating numerical data or data that can be transformed into useable statistics.

A measure of teaching quality over time which incorporates all of the key indicators of how a teacher is performing.

REFERENCES

Alexander, R. J. (2008) Towards Dialogic Teaching: rethinking classroom talk. York: Dialogos

Barber, M., Chijoke, C. and Mourshed, M. (2010) How the Worlds most improved School systems keep getting better. McKinsey and Company

Barber, M. and Mourshed, M. (2007) How the world’s best performing schools come out on top, London, McKinsey and Co. Available at http://www.mckinsey.com/locations/UK_Ireland/~/media/Reports/UKI/Education_report.ashx [accessed November 2013]

Bentley, T. and Gillinson, S. (2007) A D&R system for education. The Innovation Unit on-line resource. Available at http://www.innovationunit.org/ [accessed January 2014]

Blase, J. (1991) The Politics of Life in School: Power, Conflict and Cooperation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications

Blase, J. and Anderson, G. (1995) The Micro-politics of Educational Leadership: From Control to Empowerment. London: Cassell

British Educational Research Association. (2014) The role of research in teacher education: reviewing the evidence (interim report of the BERA-

RSA inquiry). British Educational Research Association on-line resource. Available at http://www.bera.ac.uk/ [accessed January 2014]

Brown, S., Edmonds, S. and Lee, B. (2001) Continuing Professional Development: LEA and school support for teachers. Slough: National

Foundation for Educational Research (report 23)

Burgess, B. (2014) Teacher training: we need more balance between School Direct and PGCE. The Guardian on-line resource. Available at http://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/teacher-blog/2014/jan/22/teacher-training-school-direct-pgce [accessed January 2014]

Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2011) Research Methods in Education. Routledge

REFERENCES

Collarbone, P. and Southworth, G. (2002) Learning to Lead: NCSL’s Strategy for Leadership Learning. Nottingham: National College for School

Leadership

Department for Education (2013) Research Priorities and Questions: Teachers and Teaching. URN: DFE-00083-2013. London: Department for

Education

Department for Education (2012) Teacher Standards: Guidance for school leaders, school staff and governing bodies. URN: DFE-00066-2011.

London: Department for Education

Dweck, C. S. (2006) Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House

Erickson, F. (1985) Qualitative methods in research on teaching. Institute for Research on Teaching

Garhart Mooney, C. (2013) Theories of Childhood, Second Edition: An Introduction to Dewey, Montessori, Erikson, Piaget and Vygotsky. St. Paul,

MN: Redleaf Press

Goodall, J., Day, C., Lindsay, G., Muijs, D. and Harris, A. (2005) Evaluating the Impact of Continuing Professional Development. Research Report

659. London: Department for Education and Skills

Grint, K. (2008) Wicked Issues and Clumsy Solutions: the Role of Leadership. Clinical Leader, Volume I Number II. Stockport: BAMM Publications

Hammersley, M. (2012) Methodological Paradigms in Educational Research. British Educational Research Association on-line resource.

Available at http://www.bera.ac.uk/ [accessed January 2014]

REFERENCES

Hammersley, M. and Traianou, A. (2012) Ethics and Educational Research. British Educational Research Association on-line resource. Available at http://www.bera.ac.uk/ [accessed January 2014]

Hargreaves, D. (1999) The Knowledge-creating school. Journal of Education Studies, 147 (2) June

Hattie, J. and Yates, G. (2013) Visible Learning and the Science of How We Learn. New York, NY: Routledge

Higham, R. J. E., Brindley, S., and Van de Pol, J. (2014). Shifting the primary focus: assessing the case for dialogic education in secondary classrooms. Language and Education, 28 (1)

Horst, H., Hjorth, L. and Tacchi, J. (2012) Rethinking ethnography: An introduction. Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture and Policy

145 (2012): 86

Husbands, C. and Pearce, J. (2012) What makes great pedagogy? Nine claims from research. Nottingham: National College and Institute of

Education. Theme 1

International Development Education Association of Scotland. (2007) A short toolkit on evaluating the impact of Continuing Professional

Development (CPD) workshops on teachers’ practice. International Development Education Association of Scotland on-line resource.

Available at http://www.nidos.org.uk/ [accessed October 2014]

Jackson, D. and Temperley, J. (2006) From Professional Learning Community to Networked Learning Community. Nottingham: National

College

REFERENCES

Krosnick, J. A., and Presser, S. (2010) Question and questionnaire design. Handbook of Survey Research. Second edition. Bingley, UK: Emerald:

263-314

Leask, M., Jumani, N.B. (2011) Translational research methods for the education sector: moving the dominant paradigm for teacher-education research from the 19 th C to the 21 st C

Mack, L. (2010) The philosophical underpinnings of educational research. Polyglossia Volume 19 2010: 5-11

Mayoux, L. (2001) Qualitative methods. Tool Box Resources. EDIAIS (2001)

Mitra S. (2005) Self organizing systems for mass computer literacy: Findings from the “hole in the wall” experiments . International Journal of

Development Issues 2005, 4 (1)

Morgan, A. (2010) Discourse Analysis: An Overview for the Neophyte Researcher. Journal of Health and Social Care Improvement. May 2010

The National Curriculum for England: Key Stages 1-4 (2014) The National Curriculum for England: Key Stages 1-4. London: Department for

Education: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority

Nicholls, D. (2015) Connected collaboration and deliberate altruism… growing great organisations and systems. Available at https://dannicholls1.wordpress.com/ [accessed February 2015]

Office for Standards in Education (2014) School Inspection Handbook. URN: 120101. London: Ofsted publications

REFERENCES

Office for Standards in Education (2015) School Inspection Handbook. URN: 120101. London: Ofsted publications

Office for Standards in Education (2013) School Inspection Report: Primary School A. URN: 131183. London: Ofsted publications

Office for Standards in Education (2014) School Inspection Report: Primary School B. URN: 442105. London: Ofsted publications

Office for Standards in Education (2015) Section 8 Inspection Report: Primary School B. Available at http://reports.ofsted.gov.uk/inspectionreports/find-inspection-report/provider/ELS/100154 [accessed January 2015]

Office for Standards in Education (2014) Why I want to try inspecting without grading teaching in each individual lesson. URN: 140101. London:

Ofsted publications

Peters, T and Waterman, R. (1982) In Search of Excellence. New York: Warner Books

Postlethwaite, T. N. (1997) Educational research: some basic concepts and terminology. International Institute for Educational planning. Paris:

UNESCO

Raffety, R. (2013) Collaborative Professional Development for Innovation Participation in a knowledge eco-system. London: Academy for

Innovation

Robinson, K. (2008) Changing Paradigms. RSA. http://www.thersa.org/events/video/archive/sir-ken-robinson [accessed 2013]

REFERENCES

Schein, E.H. (2013) Humble Inquiry: The Gentle Art of Asking instead of Telling. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers

Scott, P., Ametller, J., Gerais, M., and Emberton, J. (2010) Teaching and learning disciplinary knowledge: Developing the dialogic space for an answer when there isn't even a question. In K. Littleton and C. Howe (Eds.), Educational Dialogues: Understanding and promoting productive interaction (pp. 289-303). London: Routledge

Silcock, R. (2013) Design for Impact: Critical Reflective Journal. [Unpublished paper] Academy for Innovation/University of West London

Silcock, R. (2014) Inquiry for Impact: Research Paper. [Unpublished paper] Academy for Innovation/University of West London

Silcock, R. (2014) Research Methods: Research Paper. [Unpublished paper] Academy for Innovation/University of West London

Silcock, R. (2014) The Case for Change: Case for Change. [Unpublished paper] Academy for Innovation/University of West London

Silcock, R. (2014) The Case for Change: Research Paper. [Unpublished paper] Academy for Innovation/University of West London

Siraj, I. and Taggart, B. (2014) Exploring Effective Pedagogy in Primary Schools: Evidence from Research. London: Pearson

Stoll, L., Harris, A., and Handscomb, G. (2012) Great professional development which leads to great pedagogy: Nine claims from research.

Nottingham: National College (Theme 2)

Strickland, B. (2009) Creative Cities Summit. Creative Cities Summit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5BZeh6IoKk&safe=active [accessed

2013]

REFERENCES

Sutton, R.I. and Rao, H. (2014) Scaling up Excellence. London: Random House Business

Wenger, E. (2000) Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems Volume 7 (2): 225 -246 copyright Sage London, Thousand Oaks, CA and

New Delhi

Yin, R. K. (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage Publications

Yin, R. K. (2014) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage Publications

Download