GETTING OUR SYSTEMS RIGHT to secure UNIVERSAL HEALTH COVERAGE Presentation to the 10th Caribbean Health Financing Initiative Conference Raphael D. Barrett Providenciales October 2015 Turks & Caicos Islands WHO PUBLICATIONS ON UHC World Health Report 2010 "Health Systems Financing: A path to universal coverage“ World Health Report 2013 “Research for Universal Health Coverage” PAHO/WB Report 2015 “Toward Universal Health Coverage and Equity in Latin America and the Caribbean: Evidence from Selected Countries” WHAT ARE THE KEY PRINCIPLES, CHARACTERISTICS, INDICATORS OF A HEALTH FINANCING SYSTEM WHICH REFLECTS UNIVERSAL HEALTH COVERAGE? UNIVERSAL HEALTH COVERAGE – WHO Universal Health Coverage is firmly based on the WHO constitution of 1948 declaring health a fundamental human right the Health for All agenda set by the Alma-Ata declaration in 1978 Equity is paramount - tracking progress not just across the national population but within different groups (e.g. income, sex, age, place of residence, migrant status and ethnic origin) The goal of Universal Health Coverage is to ensure that all people obtain the health services they need without suffering financial hardship when paying for them UHC – WHO Fact Sheet N°395 September 2014 UHC means that all people receive the health services they need without suffering financial hardship when paying for them. UHC interventions must address the most important causes of disease and mortality whilst delivering the full spectrum of essential, quality health services to improve the health of those receiving the services. Health Financing mechanisms are a critical factor e.g. pooling funds to spread financial risk across the population, cross subsidies - rich/poor, healthy/sick increased access. UHC – WHO Fact Sheet N°395 September 2014 UHC not achieved overnight; all countries can take actions to maintain gains made and move more rapidly towards it. As Governments find it increasingly difficult to meet the increasing health service costs and ever growing needs of their populations, key factors in prioritising health services include epidemiological context, health systems, level of socioeconomic development, people’s expectations. MYTHS about Universal Health Coverage UHC is not just health financing, but covers all components of the health system to be successful UHC is not only about assuring a minimum package of health services, but also about assuring a progressive expansion of coverage of health services and financial risk protection. UHC does not mean free coverage for all possible health interventions, regardless of the cost; no country can provide all services free of charge on a sustainable basis. UHC is much more than just health taking steps towards UHC means steps towards equity, development priorities, social inclusion and cohesion ACHIEVING Universal Health Coverage A strong, efficient, well-run health system that meets priority health needs through people-centred integrated care Affordability – a system for financing health services so people do not suffer financial hardship when using them. Access to essential medicines and technologies to diagnose and treat health problems. A sufficient capacity of well-trained, motivated health workers to provide the services to meet patients’ needs based on the best available evidence. The IMPACT of Universal Health Coverage Access to health services enables people to be more productive and active contributors to their families and communities. Financial Risk Protection prevents people being pushed into poverty when they have OOP for health services. UHC is a critical component of sustainable development, poverty reduction and any effort to reduce social inequities CARICOM: Nassau declaration of 2001– the Health of the region is the Wealth of the region WHO: Universal Coverage is the hallmark of a government’s commitment to improve the wellbeing of all its citizens HEALTH FINANCING FOR UHC Given the objectives - Access, Financial Risk Protection health financing mechanisms suitable for UHC must include Encouraging and facilitating the basic principles of insurance Prepayment – so persons do not faced the full cost of an event when it occurs but have ‘saved for the rainy day’ Risk sharing – pooled funds allowing persons to share their risk Mandatory participation Government intervention, directly or indirectly, is necessary To ensure the largest insurance pool – the total population To avoid selective participation – persons staying out until they need services TO WHAT EXTENT ARE CARIBBEAN HEALTH FINANCING SYSTEMS GETTING CLOSER TO OR FARTHER FROM UNIVERSAL HEALTH COVERAGE? PROVIDING & FINANCING Caribbean Health Services Services Public health Provision/Agencies Public Financing Taxes/budget Ambulatory care (GPs, Specialists) Public, Private OOP; taxes-budget, insurance, NGOs Inpatient Care Public, Private Taxes-budget, OOP, insurance, grants Drugs & Diagnostics Public, Private OOP, insurance, taxes-budget, NHF Overseas care Public, Private Insurance, OOP, taxes-budget, grants Training-Research Public, Private Taxes-budget, OOP, grants NOTE: All countries have a high level of Out-Of-Pocket payments (avg = 28%) CARIBBEAN HEALTH FINANCING SYSTEMS Table was prepared by Dr Stanley Lalta, 2015 (source: WHO/WB, 2012) Govt Tax/Budget (>60%) SHI (>60%) Hybrid - Govt/SHI 1 Anguilla* Bermuda* Antigua 2 Barbados Cayman Is* Bahamas 3 Belize Turks & Caicos Is* Haiti 4 Dominica Aruba* Jamaica 5 Grenada Bonaire-Saba-Statia* Surinam 6 Guyana Curacao* Trinidad 7 Montserrat* St Maarten* Virgin Is. (UK)* 8 St Kitts 9 St Lucia 10 St Vincent * Data from country papers at Caribbean Health Financing Conference) HEALTH FINANCING PATTERNS IN THE CARIBBEAN Caribbean Total Health Expenditure (THE) (WHO/WB/Other..2012 database) Average THE = 6% GDP Average per capita expenditure US$600 Public spending – up to 66% thru taxes/budget funds and compulsory SHI in some countries Private spending – typically 32% of THE thru direct payments, private insurance and NGOs High OOP - average 75% of private spending; 25% of THE Low external support - <2% (except Haiti) HEALTH SERVICE PROVISION IN THE CARIBBEAN Health Services are provided by a mix of Public & Private facilities Public sector - dominant in public health, inpatient services, research/training Private sector - dominant in ambulatory care, drugs & diagnostics and overseas care for critical and complex cases Patients utilise both facilities with noticeable tiers: d more low income groups at public facilities; d middle and high income groups at private facilities; d very high income and insured persons at overseas facilities. CARIBBEAN INITIATIVES TO IMPROVE HEALTH SERVICES Examples of initiatives taken to expand and improve access, coverage and service provision of national health systems Antigua & Barbuda Medical Benefits Scheme Barbados Aruba Curacao Sint Maarten Jamaica Belize Barbados Drug Scheme AZV [Social Health Insurance] National Health Plan AZV [Social Health Insurance] 1972 Medical care - contributors 1980 Specific drugs; conditions - citizens Specific drugs; conditions - contributors 1994 Specific drugs; conditions - contributors Specific drugs; conditions - contributors Jamaica Drugs for the Elderly Programme 1996 Specific drugs; conditions - residents National Health Fund 2003 National Health Insurance Trinidad & Tobago Chronic Disease Assistance Programme 2001 Specific drugs; conditions - contributors 2004 Specific drugs; conditions - residents St. Lucia Universal Health Care 2005 Medical care - residents Bahamas National Prescription Drug Plan 2010 Specific drugs; conditions – contributors National Health Insurance 2010 Specific drugs; conditions – contributors Turks & Caicos NCCD – 54% Injuries – 11% Cardio – 52% Communicable – 20% Other – 15% Cancer – 15% NCCD – 74% Injuries – 10% Cardio – 36% Communicable – 14% Other – 2% Cancer – 17% WHAT REFORMS/MEASURES SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED TO ADDRESS GAPS IN HEALTH FINANCING SYSTEMS FOR UNIVERSAL HEALTH COVERAGE? HOW TO MANAGE THE POLITICAL/STAKEHOLDER INTERESTS WHICH INFLUENCE SUCCESS? ISSUES FOR UHC IN THE CARIBBEAN Structural Small populations and economies vulnerable to natural disasters and global economic shocks High dependence on tourism subjecting population to exposure to travel-borne diseases Growing inter-island population movement exposing some states to high migrant influx Technological low economies of scale make the purchase of technologies very expensive, per capita Due to small populations utilisation of complex, expensive services low making it difficult to retain trained staff ISSUES FOR UHC IN THE CARIBBEAN Demographic and Social aging population; increased migration of working age population growing health expectations – ready exposure to systems and services available elsewhere Epidemiological dominant CNCD (1 in 3 persons) infectious diseases – HIV, re-emerging conditions e.g. TB, Malaria ISSUES FOR UHC IN THE CARIBBEAN Macroeconomic and Fiscal Low economic growth rates and recession Fiscal constraints – budget/current account deficits; high debt burden Double digit unemployment and poverty rates Eligibility for external funds – many countries now classified as ‘middle income’ Financing Has to be mandatory as solidarity is low How to increase finances for health – taxes, contributions Better management and utilisation of pooled funds Better integration with private health insurance ISSUES FOR UHC IN THE CARIBBEAN Operational Improper use of Secondary Emergency Services Primary Care facilities Leakage of supplies, medicines, labour Issues implementing results-based provider payment systems: Private systems tend to favour cost based fee-for-service Public systems tend to favour inputs-based budgets Politics Greater demands for complicated/expensive services Should healthcare be removed from profit motive if it is designated a human right? ISSUES FOR UHC IN THE CARIBBEAN Coverage Most countries seek to restrict coverage to citizens due to the cost of providing for immigrants and the legal implications Concerns re non-citizens Have little or no political clout as they often do not have a vote Are seen as an immigration/security problem rather than the economic contributors they are, e.g. low paid jobs sometimes with mandatory statutory contributions Size in relation to the “belonger” population: Bahamas, TCI ISSUES FOR UHC IN THE CARIBBEAN Removal of user fees – “free health care” ‘free health care’ often results in lower quality/standards of services due to irrational demand Meets the UHC standard for access but is not equitable if it reduces revenues from those who can afford some payment has been difficult to counter politically – ‘freeness mentality’ has resulted in less financial resources for the sector and greater demands on the system less rational use of services with patients bypassing primary health services in favour of secondary facilities BAHAMAS NEWS EXTRACTS “The Bahamas Insurance Association has always been committed to implement UHC in a manner that is affordable, sustainable and least disruptive to the industry and economy at large… …the Prime Minister had indicated that NHI will be the ‘single biggest development’ in the Bahamas, post-independence… …we do not want to fight with the Government on a progressive social initiative that is designed to serve the best interest of the Bahamian people… …after all, we all support the principle of universal healthcare.” Private sector stakeholders believe PricewaterhouseCoopers has advised the Government to take a completely different approach to healthcare reform and adopt an ObamaCare-style plan… …rather than go with an allencompassing NHI model… coverage would be offered through private insurers, with subsidies for those who can’t afford the premiums.” HEALTH FINANCING FOR UHC 1. Need to understand that health financing being a national issue does not imply or mean 100% government financing 2. The government’s role should be coordinator, facilitator and subsidiser for specific groupings determined, preferably, economically 3. Establishing pooled funds enhances the insurance function by spreading risks and contributions over the largest pool – the total population 4. There needs to be better administration of pooled funds so that they are autonomous in the collection and management of their finances 5. More use of dedicated taxation for health – ‘sin taxes’, visitor health fee 6. Benefit structures need to be patient centric – economically enabling patients thereby giving them choice T H A N K Y O U