Islamic Social State: the Case Study of Iran Armineh Manookian Anush Begoyan CRRC-DAAD Conference on “Social State: Concept, Armenian Reality and Perspectives“, February 24-26, Tsakhkadzor The Content: i)-Iranian Economy in the Context of Islamic Economy Principles of Islamic Economy Iran’s Macroeconomic Conditions after the Islamic Revolution State Share in the Economy Privatization debate ii)-Iran’s Social State Education Health Welfare Subsidies iii)-Conclusions 2 Principals of Islamic Economy: i)-the prohibition of the charging and collection of interest, ii)-a system of taxation and redistribution known as ‘zakat’ or ‘sadaqat’, iii)-accordance of economic decisions to Islam’s moral principles 3 Iran’s Macroeconomic Conditions after Revolution 4 Islamic revolution of 1979 redefined all institutions based on Islamic norms and principles Centralized economy during Iran-Iraq war (1980-88) Approve and implementation of five year development plans (FYDP) Significant structural reforms in the 3rd FYDP (2000-2004) ambitious privatization program , granting the licenses to private banks and insurance companies establishment of the Oil Stabilization Fund (OSF), ….. Challenges that Iran’s Economy Still Facing Highly dominated by oil export (about 60 % of government budget) Large size of the public sector Low rate of tax revenue in the government budget (about 25 % of government’s general revenue) 5 High rate of liquidity (30.2 %) High rate of inflation (15 %) High rate of unemployment (10.9 %) Unsuccessful privatization program of state owned enterprises State Share in the Economy-Constitution Article 44 of Constitution of IRI: Three Sectors in Iranian Economy: i)-state, ii)-cooperative, iii)-private. State Sector is to include: “all large-scale and mother industries, foreign trade, major minerals, banking, insurance, power generation, dams, and large-scale irrigation networks, radio and television, post, telegraph and telephone services, aviation, shipping, roads, railroads and the like; all these will be publicly owned and administered by the State.” 6 Iran's State Expenditure as Percent of GDP (1959-2005) 60 50 (Percent) 40 30 20 10 0 59 19 61 19 63 19 65 19 67 19 69 19 71 19 73 19 75 19 77 19 Revolution 7 Source: National Accounts, Central Bank of Iran 79 19 81 19 83 19 85 19 87 19 89 19 91 19 Government expenditures as percent of GDP 93 19 95 19 97 19 99 19 01 20 03 20 05 20 Iran's State Expenditure as Percent of GDP and Crude Oil Price Fluctuations (1959-2005) 60 60 2nd oil shock Iran-Iraq War 50 3rd FYDP 40 40 Revolution 8 Government expenditures as percent of GDP 20 05 20 03 20 01 19 99 19 97 19 95 19 93 19 91 19 89 19 87 19 85 19 83 19 81 19 79 19 77 19 75 0 19 73 0 19 71 10 19 69 10 19 67 20 19 65 20 19 63 30 19 61 30 19 59 (Percent) 1st oil shock Crude oil price Source: National Accounts, Central Bank of Iran and http://inflationdata.com/Inflation/Inflation_Rate/Historical_Oil_Prices_Table.asp for crude oil price. (Dollar per Barrel) 50 Total Approved Budget of Iran and Its Subsections (In billion of Iranian Rials) 2003 2004 2005 General Government Budget 411,425 474,643 527,788 Banks, State Owned Enterprises and Other Organizations dependent to Government 554,337 688,921 1,055,969 22,099 23,428 35,817 943,663 1,140,135 1,547,941 1,109,532 1,406,031 NA 37.1 33.8 … 50.0 49.0 … 85 81 … Less: Duplicated Figures Total Budget of Iran GDP at current prices As percent of GDP General Government Expenditures of Banks, State Owned Enterprises and Other Organizations Dependent on Government Total Budget 9 Source: Total Budget Laws of the Islamic Republic of Iran 1382-84 (2003/04-2005/06). Management and Planning Organization Government Budget and its Functions as Percent of GDP 2003 Other 63% General Government 37% 2004 General Affairs 2% General Affairs 2% Natioanl Defence 2% Social Affairs 13% Economic Affairs 4% Natioanl Defence 2% Social Affairs 13% Other 66% General Government 34% Other * 16% Source: Total Budget Laws of the Islamic Republic of Iran 1382-83 (2003/04-2004/05). Management and Planning Organization. 10 Economic Affairs 3% Other * 14% Privatization Debate Ongoing debate between nationalization and privatization process Considerable attempts during 3rd FYDP for socio-economic reforms: – – Current conditions: – – – SOE privatization has not been fully implemented. privatization of existing banks and insurance companies has not yet occurred. licensing of four new private banks and insurance companies Main obstacle: – 11 Reforms aimed at reducing the state control over the economy. Ambitious privatization programs of state owned Enterprises (SOE), banks and insurance companies, Current interpretation of Article 44 of the Constitution Iran’s Social State Education Article 30 of Constitution: “The government must provide all citizens with free education up to secondary school, and must expand free higher education to the extent required by the country for attaining self-sufficiency.” the largest share in the government spending (24%) Three types of Institutions: public, nonprofit and private institutions In 2003-04 academic year: 12 16 million students covered by Ministry of Education. 49 percent of the total 1.9 million university students are in the public universities university female students comprise 52 percent of the total students Health over 85 percent of the population has access to health services currently the lowest share in the government spending (5%) public health centers, private health network and insurance-company-based voluntary schemes In 2004: 13 beneficiaries of “Medical Services Insurance Organization”: 32.6 million persons (approximately 50 percent of population). Out of the total number of beneficiaries, 73 percent are villagers Welfare Article 29 of Constitution refers to Social Security issue: “…the government must provide services and financial support for every individual citizen by using national revenues and funds obtained through public contributions.” Two types of welfare system: i)-contributory social security systems ii)-noncontributory social assistance and relief institutions Contributory System: 14 in 2004: 2,000,000 pensioners covered by two major organizations. (60 % of population over 65 years old.) Non Contributory System: strong organizations known as “bonyads” “Bonyads” involved in: -financial holdings, business and welfare and social affairs Targeted at: -mainly “revolutionary movements” groups, veterans and families of martyrs. Main Sources from: -net income of their asset holdings, -government transfers -charitable contributions including zakat, All the bonyads are supervised directly by the Supreme, religious leader. 15 important issues: -control a large part of social-economic activities -non transparent operation and relations with the public sector -serious issues regarding their accountability -during 3rd FYDP some positive movements to make the activities of bonyads more transparent and accountable. Subsidies Explicit subsidies: 5% of GDP for basic necessities including wheat, sugar, milk, cheese, rice and vegetable oil, fertilizers, and foreign exchange losses generated from the 1993 and 2002 exchange rate unifications. Implicit energy subsidies: 10.5 percent of GDP These arise from the differential between domestic and border prices. 16 How are the Equity and Human Development Indices in Iran? The Gini coefficient: 43 (UNDP report) (range for 124 countries is between 24.7 and 70.7) 17 Iran’s Human Development index: 99 among 177 (UNDP report) (Medium development group) Population below poverty line: 21 % in 2002 (IMF country Report) Large involvement of the state, but poor result. WHY? Poor public administration – inefficient operation, centralization of the power in the hand of selected group, incomplete and non transparent information, underdeveloped infrastructure Political and religious dominated environment and Islamic charity organizations -bias distribution of resources Non transparent operation -encourage the shadow economy General, untargeted subsidiary system -benefits are distributed to all members of country equally 18 The small role of tax in the economy Concluding General Remarks: 19 rich natural resources and the availability of large revenues through these sources not necessarily provide for the welfare and prosperity of society. The importance of good governance, effective public administration and protecting citizens through targeted regulations and guarantees The large provision of public services and some explicit subsidies for basic goods In Iranian economy can hardly have any direct and significant influence on the economy of Armenia Some impacts on Armenian economy through Iran’s implicit energy subsidies which affect final prices of goods produced by Iranian industries, which requires a separate study focusing on the positive and negative effects of it Thank you