Outlook for the rubber industry International Smallholder Rubber Conference Phnom Penh, Cambodia 24 June 2009 Panel 4 : Prospects Prepared by the Secretariat of the International Rubber Study Group Presentation content The world economy, the IMF scenario The vehicle sector The tyre sector Long-term aggregate rubber demand forecasts Natural rubber supply potential Natural and synthetic rubber demand The effect of alternative economic growth scenarios Economic developments Economic activity is represented by Gross Domestic Product (GDP) IRSG uses data from IMF IRSG forecasts for 2009 to 2014 are taken from the IMF IMF published data/forecasts in April 2009 Forecasts for later years are based on IRSG model World GDP growth, July 2008 and April 2009: recession hits earlier 8 7 6 5 4 % 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 1970 1975 data 1980 1985 1990 1995 forecasts July 2008 2000 2005 2010 2015 forecasts April 2009 The vehicle sector Passenger car production 90 80 70 millions 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 production 2000 Jul-08 2005 Apr-09 2010 2015 Commercial vehicle production 30 25 millions 20 15 10 5 0 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 production 2000 Jul-08 2005 Apr-09 2010 2015 Growth in vehicle production % growth Passenger cars Commercial vehicles 2006 6.3 0.4 2007 5.8 4.5 2008 -1.3 -6.6 2009 -22.4 -20.1 2010 3.6 7.6 2011 22.3 12.8 2015 14.3 10.7 2018 -3.4 -5.8 The tyre sector Tyre sector Tyre sales is the sum of original equipment (OE) tyre sales, determined by the number of vehicles produced replacement (RP) tyre sales, determined by the number of vehicles on the road Passenger car tyre sales, original equipment 450 400 350 millions 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 1975 1980 1985 1990 sales 1995 2000 Jul-08 2005 Apr-09 2010 2015 Passenger car tyre sales, replacement 1200 1000 millions 800 600 400 200 0 1975 1980 1985 1990 sales 1995 2000 Jul-08 2005 Apr-09 2010 2015 Passenger car tyre sales, total 1600 1400 millions 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 1975 1980 1985 1990 sales 1995 2000 Jul-08 2005 Apr-09 2010 2015 Commercial vehicle tyre sales, original equipment 140 120 millions 100 80 60 40 20 0 1975 1980 1985 1990 sales 1995 2000 Jul-08 2005 Apr-09 2010 2015 Commercial vehicle tyre sales, replacement 600 500 millions 400 300 200 100 0 1975 1980 1985 1990 sales 1995 2000 Jul-08 2005 Apr-09 2010 2015 Commercial vehicle tyre sales, total 700 600 millions 500 400 300 200 100 0 1975 1980 1985 1990 sales 1995 2000 Jul-08 2005 Apr-09 2010 2015 Growth in tyre production % growth Passenger car tyres Commercial vehicle tyres 2006 0.8 3.7 2007 5.9 5.6 2008 -0.4 0.2 2009 -6.4 -3.8 2010 -3.4 4.5 2011 4.5 5.4 2015 8.7 7.6 2018 0.4 0.8 Long-term aggregate rubber demand forecasts Aggregate rubber demand Aggregate rubber demand in the tyre sector; influencing factors are tyre production and rubber weight per tyre Aggregate rubber demand in the general rubber goods sector; influencing factor is economic development Rubber consumption 2018: tyres 16.5, GRG 11.2, total 27.7 35 30 million tonnes 25 20 15 10 5 0 1975 1980 1985 tyres Jul-08 GRG May-09 1990 1995 2000 tyres May-09 total Jul-08 2005 2010 2015 GRG Jul-08 total May-09 World rubber consumption (‘000 tonnes) Total rubber volume % growth 2006 21,810 4.0 2007 23,045 5.7 2008 22,299 -3.2 2009 20,817 -6.6 2010 21,392 2.8 2011 22,502 5.2 2015 27,118 6.1 2018 27,669 0.7 Modelling natural rubber supply potential Natural rubber supply potential About 85% of natural rubber is produced by smallholders Production capacity suitable concept for synthetic rubber, but not for natural rubber A general framework for natural rubber supply The trend in production will be called normal production Production exceeds normal production at high prices And vice versa The vintage approach derives and includes The composition of the total area for natural rubber according to the year of planting (the vintages) The average yield profile for a hectare of rubber during its life Technical progress in quality of clones affecting yield profiles of hectares planted in various years 18 April 2009 Projections up to 2018 depend on planting policies Natural rubber production Thailand 4000 3500 '000 tonnes 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 1975 1980 1985 data 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 normal production 2015 Natural rubber production Indonesia 4000 3500 '000 tonnes 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 1975 1980 1985 data 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 normal production 2015 Natural rubber production Malaysia 1800 1600 '000 tonnes 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 1975 1980 1985 data 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 normal production 2015 Natural rubber production India 1200 '000 tonnes 1000 800 600 400 200 0 1975 1980 1985 data 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 normal production 2015 Natural rubber production Vietnam '000 tonnes 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 1975 1980 1985 data 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 normal production 2015 Natural rubber production China 800 700 600 '000 tonnes 500 400 300 200 100 0 1975 1980 1985 data 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 normal production 2015 Natural rubber production Sri Lanka 180 160 '000 tonnes 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1975 1980 1985 data 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 normal production 2015 '000 tonnes Natural rubber production Cambodia 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1975 1980 1985 data 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 normal production 2015 Global NR normal production to reach 13.0 million t. by 2018; actual production higher or lower depending on prices 14000 12000 '000 tonnes 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 1975 1980 1985 data 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 normal production 2015 Confronting supply potential and demand at 2008 market shares The market Forecasts for consumption of rubber (already presented) Production potential of natural rubber (already presented) How do these compare? What are the determining factors driving the share of NR in total rubber consumption In broad terms: • Technology: shares may depend on the country or the factory • Composition of the end-uses: cv tyres use more NR than pc tyres • Price ratio of NR over SR Rubber prices and oil Explaining developments in NR prices Analysis based on market equilibrium: supply and demand Explaining developments in SR prices Modelling prices of SBR using prices of styrene, butadiene and NR and GDP: a good fit 2.50 2.30 2.10 US$/kg 1.90 1.70 1.50 1.30 1.10 0.90 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 data 2000 model 2002 2004 2006 2008 Projections of prices of oil are given below. The price of oil to level off at around US$80/barrel and then decline 140 120 US$/barrel 100 80 60 40 20 0 1990 1995 2000 data 2005 Jul-08 2010 Apr-09 2015 The IRSG makes and needs price forecasts for NR and SR in interaction with production and consumption forecasts. The IRSG is not allowed to publish these forecasts. NR share in consumption 48 47 % 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 1995 2000 share 2005 43% 2010 forecast 46% 2015 Rubber consumption 2018: NR 12.8, SR 14.9, total 27.7 35 30 million tonnes 25 20 15 10 5 0 1975 1980 1985 NR Jul-08 SR May-09 1990 1995 2000 NR May-09 total Jul-08 2005 2010 2015 SR Jul-08 total May-09 World natural rubber consumption (‘000 tonnes) Consumption NR volume % growth 2006 9,243 1.8 2007 9,884 6.9 2008 9,726 -1.6 2009 9,232 -5.1 2010 9,703 5.1 2011 10,263 5.8 2015 12,313 6.1 2018 12,809 1.3 Consequences of alternative GDP scenarios Base: GDP scenario as described above Optimistic scenario: higher growth than in the base scenario Pessimistic scenario: lower growth than in the base scenario Growth in world GDP, alternative scenarios 6 5 4 3 % 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 2000 data 2002 2004 base 2006 2008 2010 optimistic scenario 2012 2014 2016 2018 pessimistic scenario NR consumption 2018: between 12.6 and 13.0 million tonnes 15 14 million tonnes 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 2000 data 2002 2004 base 2006 2008 2010 optimistic scenario 2012 2014 2016 pessimistic scenario 2018 The role of the IRSG The IRSG is the only public organisation providing appropriate forecasts for the rubber industry. This is most important in the current uncertain situation. The IRSG needs support and membership from all governments and industries involved in rubber and rubber products in order to be able to provide this service for optimal public and private planning . Thank you!