Introducing metadata

advertisement

Introducing metadata

Finding stuff and using stuff

Gordon Dunsire

Overview

• What is metadata?

• What does it look like?

• What is it used for?

• How does it work?

• Where will it all end?

Definition?

• “Data about data”

• Information about information

• Information about an information resource

• Useful information about a resource

• Useful information about specific aspects of a resource

• Whatever, there’s a lot of it about

Example: URL

http://www.slainte.org.uk/files/pdf/cilips/foisa04.pdf

Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002: a guide for the information professional

“http” = how to get the document (protocol)

“www.slainte.org.uk” = where to find the document in cyberspace

(domain)

“files/pdf/cilips” = where the document is stored (path)

“foisa04” = the name of the document (file name)

“pdf” = the type of document (file type)

“:”, “/”, “.” = standard punctuation separating each piece of information (element)

Example: Catalogue card

The adventures of Sherlock Holmes / by A. Conan Doyle ; illustrations by

Sidney Paget. - London : G. Newnes,

1895.

“The adventures of Sherlock Holms” = title of the book

“by A. Conan Doyle; illustrations by Sidney Paget” = who is responsible for the creative content of the book

“London” = place of publication, “G. Newnes” = name of publisher

“1895” = date of publication

“/”, “.”, “-”, “:” = standard punctuation separating each element

Example: Accessions/purchase register

Date |Title |Date|Sup|Price|Number

10/02/65|Physics is fun |1964|THI| 7/6| 20156

10/02/65|Physics is fun |1964|THI| 7/6| 20157

10/02/65|Berkeley physics v.1 |1964|FAR|3/9/6| 20158

10/02/65|Berkeley physics v.2 |1964|FAR|2/7/0| 20159

10/02/65|Berkeley physics v.3 |1964|FAR|2/7/6| 20160

10/02/65|Berkeley physics v.4 |1964|FAR|3/9/6| 20161

10/02/65|Berkeley physics v.5 |1964|FAR|3/9/6| 20162

Some uses of metadata (1)

• Information retrieval (finding stuff)

– Searching

• Lists of metadata elements (title, authors, publisher, etc.)

• Words in (digital) metadata (title, notes, etc.)

– Identifying

• Descriptive metadata (title, notes, edition, date, etc.)

– Finding

• Item metadata (shelfmark, barcode, etc.)

Some uses of metadata (2)

• Stock management (managing stuff)

– Acquisition

• Date, cost, supplier, etc.

– Storage

• Collection, shelfmark

– Circulation

• Barcode

– Preservation

• Format (serial, a-v, digital, etc.), date (age), etc.

Some uses of metadata (3)

• Automated processing (using stuff)

– Information retrieval

• OPACs

– Access to digital resources

• Getting via Web browser, file transfer, etc.

• Displaying using browser plug-ins, etc.

– Multiple metadata records in multiple electronic locations with different metadata formats

Characteristics (1)

• A metadata record is (usually) significantly smaller than the stuff it describes

– Catalogue card vs book

– Metadata is a precis or abstract of those aspects of the data deemed useful for retrieval, management, processing, etc.

– Abbreviations and codes are often used

– Some exceptions include small manuscripts with a long history …

Characteristics (2)

• Different types of information resource require different metadata elements

– Some elements are common; e.g. title, date

– Publication pattern and frequency are specific to serial resources

– URLs don’t apply to printed books

– Local preservation metadata is not required for remote digital resources

– Etc.

Characteristics (3)

• Many resources are composed of other resources, so metadata can be applied at different levels of “granularity”

– In library catalogues, journals usually have metadata about the journal as a whole, and not about individual articles

• Articles have metadata in abstract and indexing services

– Some libraries catalogue multi-media kits as a whole; others catalogue each component

Value of consistency

• A benefit of metadata is to provide consistency and coherency in using and processing resources

– Resources themselves come with the widest variation in “intrinsic” metadata

• Forms of title, etc.; layout; completeness; etc.

– Metadata can be created consistently and structured coherently to improve effectiveness and efficiency in its use

• Similarities and differences easier to spot

Achieving consistency

• Ensuring consistent metadata is not simple

– Common and format-specific elements as well as creative reaction to “the norm”

• “Ceci n’est pas une pipe”

– Natural variation in naming and describing things

• J. Smith, John Smith, John Smith (Labour), etc.

• Requires standards and guidance

Metadata standards

• Coherent set of elements organised (structured and labelled) in a consistent way – a schema

(loosely)

– “Title” or “Caption”? Include the subtitle or use a

“Subtitle” element? Always include a title?

• Guidance on identifying and interpreting elements in the resource

– Title on spine, cover or title-page?

• Guidance on standardising content

– Include “The” at the start of the title?

From the local …

• Achieving consistency benefits local users of metadata (efficient, effective)

• Self-propelled users become non-local, so there are benefits in achieving consistency between libraries

• And metadata creation is complex

(expensive), so there is value in sharing records

… to the global

• So national and international standards have been used since the first modern library catalogues (100+ years)

• With significant evolution from the 1960s

– Computers; “machine-readable cataloguing”

• And again from the 1990s

– Internet/Web; “common information environment” including archives and museums

Some standards (1)

• MARC21 (21 st century machine-readable cataloguing)

– 40 years old; covers wide range of library stuff in depth

• Difficult to use - requires professional training

• DC (Dublin Core) – Ohio, that is

– 10 years old; covers wider range of stuff (archives, museums) at much less depth

• Easier to use by a wider range of people

• DC/MARC structures can interoperate via element mappings

Some standards (2)

• AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing

Rules)

– Older than MARC; covers wide range of library stuff in depth

• Complements MARC; requires professional training

– Undergoing radical development as RDA

(Resource Description and Access)

• Becoming suitable for DC and other formats

• Content interoperability

Whither metadata?

• Many formats in use

• Wide variation in coverage and content

• No longer created exclusively by trained professionals

– Wider “interpretation” of the rules (if any)

• Needs to be joined-up so it can be used effectively at a global (non-local) level

– Interoperability!

Joined-up metadata

• Caters to a wider range of users

• Public/life-long learners/local business; staff/students; teachers/learners/researchers; archives/libraries/museums

• Covers a wider range of resources

• Originals/digitised copies; complex websites/blogs/wikis; archives/libraries/museums

• Is created by a wider range of people

• Acquisitions/cataloguing/serials; webpage writers/online reviewers/wikis/folksonomists

Recap

• Metadata is useful information about specific aspects of a resource

• Specific aspects are structured and labelled as metadata elements

• Different types of resource have different sets of elements, with a common core set

• Non-local use is increasingly important

• Standards are evolving to improve usefulness

Thank you

My card

Dunsire, Gordon

Me / My parents. - Kirkcaldy : The parents, 1951.

g.dunsire@strath.ac.uk

Download