00. Principles of Radiation Protection and Motivation for the Course

advertisement
IAEA Standard Syllabus Course on Radiation Protection in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
RADIATION PROTECTION IN
DIAGNOSTIC AND
INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
L 0. Principles of Radiation Protection and
Motivation for the Course
IAEA
International Atomic Energy Agency
Introduction
• Subject matter motivation for radioprotection
and quality assurance in diagnostic and
interventional radiology
• Give an overview of different contributions of
radiation exposure, the principles of
radiation protection
• Specifity of the medical exposure
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
2
Is there
RADIATION
in this room?
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
3
Radiation - We live with
Natural Radiation: Cosmic rays, radiation within our
body, in food we eat, water we drink, house we live
in, lawn, building material etc.
Human Body: K-40, Ra-226, Ra-228
e.g. a man with 70 kg wt.
140 gm of K
140 x 0.012%=
0.0168 gm of K-40
0.1 Ci of K-40
24,000 photons emitted/min
(T1/2 of K-40 = 1.3 billion yrs)
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
4
K-40 Estimate for Lean Body Mass
• Body weight = Fat + lean body mass
• K-40 directly related to lean body mass
• Whole body counter used
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
5
Radiation - We live with
Earth: Top 1m of 0.1 acre garden
=1200 kg of K of which K-40 =1.28 Kg
= +3.6 Kg of Th + 1 Kg Ur
μGy/yr
New Delhi, India
700
Bangalore, India
825
Bombay, India
424
Kerala, India (in narrow
Coastal strip)
4000
Ramsar, Iran
10000
Guarapari, Brazil
8760
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
6
Radiation - We live with
Food
Radioactive levels (Bq/kg)
Daily intake
(g/d)
Rice
Wheat
Pulses
Ra-226
Th-228
Pb-210
K-40
150
270
60
0.126
0.296
0.233
0.267
0.270
0.093
0.133
0.133
0.115
62.4
142.2
397.0
Other
Vegetables
70
0.126
0.167
--
135.2
Leafy
Vegetables
15
0.267
0.326
--
89.1
Milk
90
--
--
--
38.1
1370
0.067
0.089
0.063
65.0
Composite
Diet
IAEA
Dose equivalent=0.315 mSv/yr
Total dose from Natural sources = 1.0 to 3.0 mSv/yr
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
8
Radiation from Natural Sources
• Normally 1-3 mSv/year
• In areas of high background, 3-13 mSv/year
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
9
DO WE NEED
RADIATION
PROTECTION ?
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
10
Drinking Hot Coffee
Excess Temperature = 60º - 37 = 23º
1 sip = 3ml
3x 23 = 69 calories
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
11
Lethal Dose= 4Gy
LD 50/60 = 4 Gy
For man of 70 kg
Energy absorbed = 4 x 70 = 280 Joules
= 280/418= 67 calories
= 1 sip
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
12
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
14
SO WE NEED
RADIATION
PROTECTION
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
15
Radiation
We live with
1-3 mSv
Can kill
4000 mSv
Where to stop, where is the safe point?
What are the effects of radiation?
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
16
What can radiation do?
Death
Cancer
Skin Burns
Cataract
Infertility
Genetic effects
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
17
CAN X RAYS
CAUSE
DEATH?
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
18
Effect
Deterministic effects
Cataract
infertility
erythema
epilation
Dose
500 mSv cataract
150 mSv for sterility (temporary-males)
2500 mSv for ovarian
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
19
OBJECTIVES OF RADIATION
PROTECTION
• PREVENTION of deterministic effect
• LIMITING the probability of stochastic effect
HOW? Up to what point?
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
20
Optimization
• Optimization balances diagnostic image
quality with dose to the patient.
• High dose >> High image quality
• Low dose may imply low image quality
• However, there are a range of doses where
image quality is clinically acceptable– want
to be in that range
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
21
Optimizaiton
• Optimization is not ALARA
• A certain amount of radiation is needed to
provide the clinical image quality necessary
for diagnostic purposes
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
22
Which Exposure is Optimum?
6.0 mGy
1.5 mGy
IAEA
3.0 mGy
0.6 mGy
Little difference in
noise between 6
and 3 mGy,
therefore 6 mGy is
too high.
0.6 mGy too noisy.
Optimum between
1.5 and 3.0 mGy.
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
23
OPTIMIZATION
principle
To what extent OPTIMIZATION ?
Over-stretching OPTIMIZA …………………… TION
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
24
Features of some epidemiological studies of
radiation-induced cancer risks
Life Span Study
(LSS) of
Japanese atomic
bomb survivors
Parameter (Shimizu et al)
Massachusetts
Ankylosing
tuberculosis patients
Spondylitis
given chest
Study (ASS) fluoroscopies
(Weiss et al) (Boice et al)
Children in
Israel irradiated
for ringworm
of the scalp
(Ron et al)
UK National Registry for
Radiation Workers
(Kendall et al)
Population 75991
14109
size
(with DS86 doses)
2573
10834
95217
Period of 5-55 years
Up to over
follow-up following exposure 50 years
(mean 25.2
years)
Up to over 50 years
Up to 32 years
Up to 40 years
(mean 30 years)
(mean 26 years)
Under 15 to over 40
0-15 years
Ranges of:
(a) ages at All
exposure
(b) sexes Similar numbers of
males and females
© ethnic Japanese
groups
Setting in War
which
exposure IAEA
was received
Virtually all
 15 years
83.5% male
18-64 years
Female
Similar number of 92% male
males and females
Western (UK) Western (N. American) African and Asian Western (UK)
Medical:ther- Medical:diagnostic
Medical:therapy Occupational
apy for nonfor non-malignant
malignant
disease
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
disease
25
Features of some epidemiological studies of
radiation-induced cancer risks (cont.)
Parameter
Range of
organs
irradiated
Life Span Study
(LSS) of
Japanese atomic
bomb survivors
(Shimizu et al)
Massachusetts
Ankylosing
tuberculosis patients
Spondylitis
given chest
Study (ASS) fluoroscopies
(Weiss et al) (Boice et al)
Children in
Israel irradiated
for ringworm
of the scalp
(Ron et al)
All
All (but
mainly those
in proximity
to spine
mainly brain,
bone marrow,
thyroid, skin
and breast
All
Brain, thyroid &
skin doses:
individual basis
Individual whole-body
external doses
Brain: 0-6 Gy
(mean 1.5 Gy)
Thyroid:0-0.5 Gy
(mean 0.09 Gy)
High
Mainly 0-0.5 Sv
(mean 0.034 Sv)
Low
Low-LET
Mainly low-LET
Mainly breast & lung
Availability Organ doses:
Mean organ Organ doses:
of dose
individual basis doses: indiv. Individual basis
estimates
only for red
bone marrow
at present
Range dose Mainly 0-4 Gy Mainly 0-20 Gy Mainly 0-3 Gy
Dose rate
High
Radiation
Quality
Mainly low-LET Low-LET
IAEA
High
High, but highly
fractionated
Low-LET
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
UK National Registry
for Radiation Workers
(Kendall et al)
26
Dose Limits (ICRP 60)
Effective dose
Annual equivalent
dose to
• Lens of eye
• Skin
• Hands & Feet
Occupational
Public
20 mSv/yr averaged*
over 5 yrs.
1 mSv in a yr
150 mSv1
500 mSv
500 mSv
15 mSv
50 mSv
* with further provision that dose in any single yr > 30 mSv (AERB)
and =50 mSv (ICRP)
N.B.: M.P.D. 1931 = 500 mSv, 1947=150 mSv, 1977=50 mSv &
in 1990=20 mSvICRP
1In
a statement (Statement on Tissue Reactions Approved by the Commission on April 21, 2011) proposed a
limit of 20 mSv/yr, averaged over 5 years, not exceeding 50 mSv at any single year .
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
27
Changes in Dose Limit (ICRP)
(Safe levels)
mSv
500
400
300
200
100
0
1931
IAEA
1947
1977
1990
Year
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
28
WHAT IS
BASIS FOR
DOSE LIMITS?
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
29
Epidemiological studies have proven that there is
an increased risk for cancer following exposure to
radiation
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
30
WHY
REDUCTION IN
DOSE LIMITS?
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
31
PRINCIPLES
OF
RADIATION
PROTECTION
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
32
1. Justification of practices
2. Optimization of protection by
keeping exposure as low as
reasonably achievable
3. Dose limits for occupational
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
33
HOW TO APPLY
THESE PRINCIPLES IN
DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY?
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
34
RADIOGRAPHY
How much time one works with radiation?
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
35
Radiation ON Time
Workload=100 exposures/day
CxR = 50x50 m sec = 2500 = 2.5
LS = 50x800 m sec = 40000=40s
Total time = 45 sec/day
Not greater than 1 min/day
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
36
Staff Doses
Dose limit ICRP = 20 mSv/yr.
Radiography work  0.1 mS/yr.
i.e. 1/200th of
dose limit
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
37
Radiation Doses in Radiological Exam.
(as multiple of chest X ray)
mSv
.05
0.15
0.49
0.92
1.0
1.22
1.4
1.5
1.7
2.15
2.59
3.0
3.61
3.67
3.8
4.0
4.36
6.0
6.8
7.13
7.69
9.0
Relative Dose Received
Arm, head,ankle & foot (1)
Head & Neck (3)
Head CT (10)
Thoracic Spine (18)
Mammography, Cystography (20)
Pelvis (24)
Abdomen, Hip, Upper & lower femur (28)
Ba Swallow (30)
Obsteric abdomen (34)
Lumbo-sacral area (43)
Cholangiography (52)
Lumber Myelography (60)
Lower abdomen CT male (72)
Upper Abdomen CT (73)
Ba Meal (76)
Angio-head, Angio-peripheral (80)
Urography (87)
Angio-abdominal (120)
Chest CT (136)
Lower Abd. CT fem. (142)
Ba enema (154)
Lymphan. (180)
0
IAEA
50
100
number of chest X rays
150
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
200
38
IS IT POSSIBLE TO GET
DETERMINISTIC EFFECTS IN
RADIOGRAPHIC WORK ?
For staff, for patient..??
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
39
Radiography
Risk of
Death
Skin burn
Infertility
Cataract
Cancer
Genetic effect
Staff
No
No
No
No
U
U
Patient
No
No
No
No
U
U
Public
No
No
No
No
U
U
U: unlikely
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
40
FLUOROSCOPY
AND
CT
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
41
Fluoroscopy and CT
Barium study: 3-6 min/pt x 8 patients/d
=40 min/d
ANGIOGRAPHY
• Diagnostic = 50 min/d
• Therapeutic = 2-5 hr/d
CT
= 10-45 min/d
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
42
Fluoroscopy (excl. inv angio)
Risk of
Death
Skin burn
Infertility
Cataract
Cancer
Genetic effect
Staff
No
No
No
No
U
U
Patient
No
No
No
No
U
U
Public
No
No
No
No
U
U
U: unlikely
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
43
Summary
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Radiation we live with
Radiation that can be lethal
Radiation effects
Dose limits
Principles of protection
Application of protection principles in
diagnostic radiology
IAEA
Introduction to Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology
44
Download