I WAYAN SUSANTO, D.A. SIHASALE DAN SOEMARNO
Diunduh dari:
http://blogpdf.com/mixed-methods-research---sample-heading-text-48913293……
23/9/2012
Diunduh dari: http://blogpdf.com/mixed-methods-research---sample-heading-text-48913293 …… 23/9/2012
Diunduh dari: http://blogpdf.com/mixed-methods-research---sample-heading-text-48913293 …… 23/9/2012
Diunduh dari: http://blogpdf.com/mixed-methods-research---sample-heading-text-48913293 …… 23/9/2012
Diunduh dari: http://blogpdf.com/mixed-methods-research---sample-heading-text-48913293 …… 23/9/2012
Diunduh dari: http://blogpdf.com/mixed-methods-research---sample-heading-text-48913293 …… 23/9/2012
Diunduh dari: http://blogpdf.com/mixed-methods-research---sample-heading-text-48913293 …… 23/9/2012
Diunduh dari: http://blogpdf.com/mixed-methods-research---sample-heading-text-48913293 …… 23/9/2012
Diunduh dari: http://blogpdf.com/mixed-methods-research---sample-heading-text-48913293 …… 23/9/2012
Tujuan integrasi
Tujuan desain MM
Diunduh dari:
…… 23/9/2012




Peningkatan minat dan advokasi tentang MMR
Berkembangnya pemahaman tentang apa itu
MMR
Berkembangnya disain dan teknik-teknik
inovatif
“The emergence of mixed methods as a third
methodological movement in the social and behavioral
sciences began during the 1980’s.” (Tashakkori &
Teddlie, 2003: 697)
Diunduh dari: faculty.unlv.edu/kfernandez/.../mixmethod.pp... 22/9/2912
“Kombinasi metode kualitatif dan kuantitatif
telah semakin berkembang dalam riset
kesehatan masyarakat.” (1999)
Mentioned several
approaches for combining
qualitative and
quantitative research
Advanced considerations for deciding
what model to use (literature
available, prior studies,
realistic design, expertise)
Suggested to describe each
method thoroughly
Diunduh dari: faculty.unlv.edu/kfernandez/.../mixmethod.pp... 22/9/2912
BUKU-BUKU TENTANG MMR
Diunduh dari: faculty.unlv.edu/kfernandez/.../mixmethod.pp... 22/9/2912
A New Journal
Journals
Devoted to Mixed
Methods:
Fieldwork Quality and
Quantity Mixed Method
Approaches
Editors: John W. Creswell
and Abbas Tashakkori
Managing Editor: Vicki L.
Plano Clark
Email: vpc@unlserve.unl.edu
Diunduh dari: faculty.unlv.edu/kfernandez/.../mixmethod.pp... 22/9/2912
Mixed Methods Conference,
Cambridge, England, July 21-24, 2008
 Proposed mixed methods conference,
Sydney, Australia, 2009
 Discipline conferences with mixed
methods papers

Diunduh dari: faculty.unlv.edu/kfernandez/.../mixmethod.pp... 22/9/2912

Is there a post-positivist leaning to mixed methods?
 Howe, K. R. (2004). A critique of experimentalism. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 42-61.
 Giddings, L. S. (2006). Mixed-methods research: Positivism dressed in drag? Journal
of Research in Nursing, 11(3), 195-2003.
 Holmes, C. A. (2007). Mixed(up) methods, methodology and interpretive frameworks.
Contributed paper for the Mixed Methods Conference, Cambridge, University, July
10-12, 2006.

What are the limits for mixed methods research?
 Sale, J. E. M., Lohfeld, L. H., Brazil, K. (2002). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative
debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Quality and Quantity, 36, 43-53.
 Leahey, E. (2007). Convergence and confidentiality? Limits to the implementation
of mixed methodology. Social Science Research, 36, 149-158.

Is there a dominant discourse in mixed methods research?
• Freshwater, D. (2007). Reading mixed methods research: Contexts for criticism.
Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 134-146.
Diunduh dari: faculty.unlv.edu/kfernandez/.../mixmethod.pp... 22/9/2912
Identifikasi Masalah Riset
Kajian literatur
Identifying a purpose
and stating questions
Collecting data
Analyzing and interpreting data
Reporting and evaluating the study
Diunduh dari: faculty.unlv.edu/kfernandez/.../mixmethod.pp... 22/9/2912
Ethnography
Case Study Research Narrative research Experimental
research
Qual ----- Quan
Qual----- Quan
Qual-----Quan
Qual---- Quan
Diunduh dari: faculty.unlv.edu/kfernandez/.../mixmethod.pp... 22/9/2912










Multi-method
Triangulation
Integrated
Combined
Quantitative and qualitative methods
Multi-methodology
Mixed methodology
Mixed-method
Mixed research
Mixed methods
Diunduh dari: faculty.unlv.edu/kfernandez/.../mixmethod.pp... 22/9/2912
Data Konvergen:
Qual
Results
Quan
Connect data:
Qual
Quan
Results
Embed the data:
Quan data
Qual data
Diunduh dari: faculty.unlv.edu/kfernandez/.../mixmethod.pp... 22/9/2912










Validitas – untuk “menguatkan” data quan dan qual.
Offset – offset weaknesses of quan and qual and draw on
strengths
Completeness – more comprehensive account that qual or quan
alone
Proses – quan menyediakan outcomes; qual menjelaskan proses
Eksplanasi – qual dapat menjelaskan hasil-hasil quan atau
sebaliknya
Hasil yang tidak diharapkan – hasil-hasil yang mengherankan
dari satu sudut pandang, sudut pandang yang lain menjelaskan
Pengembangan Instrument– qual menggunakan instrumenyang
dirancang
Kredibilitas – kedua pendekatan memperbaiki integritas temuan
Konteks – qual menyediak konteks; quan menyediakan
“general”.
Utilitas – lebih bermanfaat bagi praktisi.
Diunduh dari: faculty.unlv.edu/kfernandez/.../mixmethod.pp... 22/9/2912

Pragmatisme (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2003)
 Fokus pada pertanyaan penelitian
 Apa “kerja,” konsekwensi
 Metode-metode Multiple.

Transformatif (Mertens, 2003)
 Transform lives of under represented,
marginalized groups
 Incorporate this focus into all phases of research
Diunduh dari: faculty.unlv.edu/kfernandez/.../mixmethod.pp... 22/9/2912
Perkembangan Penting
 Notation
 Typologies
 Diagrams of procedures
 Complex evaluation models
 Reconceptualizing designs
 Emergence of innovations in procedures
Unusual blends
Methodological issues
Data analysis techniques
Presentation techniques
Diunduh dari: faculty.unlv.edu/kfernandez/.../mixmethod.pp... 22/9/2912
Pendekatan
Tipe
Tujuan
Keterbatasan
Resolusi
QUAL + quan
Simultan
Enrich description
of sample
Qualitative sample
Utilize normative
data for
comparison of
results
QUAL
Sekuensial
Test emerging H,
determine
distribution of
phenomenon in
population
Qualitative sample
Draw adequate
random sample
from same
population
QUAN + qual
Simultan
To describe part of
phenomena that
cannot be
quantified
Quantitative
sample
Select appropriate
theoretical sample
from random
sample
QUAN
Sekuensial
To examine
unexpected
results
Quantitative
sample
Select appropriate
theoretical sample
from random
sample
quan
qual
Diunduh dari: faculty.unlv.edu/kfernandez/.../mixmethod.pp... 22/9/2912
Parsimonious Designs (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2007)
Concurrent Mixed Methods Designs
Disain Triangulasi
QUAN
Data &
Results
QUAL
Data &
Results
Interpretasi
Disain Embedded
QUAN
Pre-test
Data &
Results
Intervention
qual
Process
QUAN
Post-test
Data &
Results
Interpretasi
Diunduh dari: faculty.unlv.edu/kfernandez/.../mixmethod.pp... 22/9/2912
Sequential Designs - Mixed Methods Designs
Desain Eksplanatori
QUAN
Data &
Results
Following up
qual
Data &
Results
Interpretati
on
Disain Eksploratori
QUAL
Data &
Results
Building to
quan
Data &
Results
Interpretati
on
Disain Embedded Sekuensial
Beforeintervention
qual
QUAN
Intervention
Trial
Afterintervention
qual
Diunduh dari: faculty.unlv.edu/kfernandez/.../mixmethod.pp... 22/9/2912
Interpreta
tion





Kombinasi metode-metode yang dapat dipilih
The epistemological and ontological
implications of what is chosen
The practicalities of carrying out the research
How the data are going to be brought together
(lack of theory?)
Ketegangan di antara pendekatan dan metodemetode

Multiple Method Research Designs (MMRD)
▪ Multi-method designs -1+ method within paradigms
▪ Mixed methods designs -1+ method mixed
paradigms
▪ Combining methods – 1+ method, one subsumed to
other?
▪ Integrating methods – 1+ method of equal weight?
▪ Triangulasi – outcome dari MMRD?*
▪ Transformasi Data
 Mengkuantitatifkan data
 Mengkualitatifkan data

Emic and etic understandings?

Multiple research-questions?

Multiple facets or contexts

Multiple of singular-reality?

Mixed phenomena?








Sequential atau parallel?
Linked atau independent?
Respondent enrolment
Development of research instruments
Time required
Costs – value for money?
Necessary expertise?
Organisasi Tim dan Komunikasi.

Where’s your theory? How does that help?

Assumptions and presumptions –
negotiating a path through/round them

Integration; triangulation; combination?

When are you going to integrate? Have you
missed the moment?

Will your audience understand?

Metodologis
▪ Differing findings
▪ Unit analisis

Politis
▪ Preferensi / persyaratan audien

Praktikal
▪ Waktu
▪ Biaya
▪ Umur data.
Multidata-monoanalysis—this is the

Multi-faceted
nature of all
phenomena

Kontextualitas

Dimensi/hubunga
n Micro-mesomacro

Agensi dan
struktur.
analysis of both data types (qualitative
AND quantitative) using only one
analysis type.
This results in:
1. Only quantitative analysis of your
qualitative data , atau
2. Only qualitative analysis of your
quantitative data.
We recommend that you avoid this
approach because it is not wise to only
analyze your qualitative data
quantitatively or only analyze your
quantitative data qualitatively.
Diunduh dari: www.sagepub.com/.../notes/Ch19_Lecture.do... …… 26/10/2012






Essentialist approaches
Constructionist approaches
Fixed state/status
Contextual and fluid
An inherent weakness or something managed
and negotiated?
Children and vulnerability

Pendekatan yang mana dan mengapa yang
itu?

Tidak cukup untuk beberapa tujuan tertentu
 Mis. Pengembangan kebijakan

Cannot elaborate micro-meso-macro
interfaces and relationships

Struktur dan agensi

Some presumptions are problematic

Fenomena Multi-dimensional
 Access via different methods derived from an
interpretivist stance
 Dapat mengkaji kontingensi dan aspek-aspek
dinamik
 Draw on emic and etic conceptualisations to plan
a strong design for mixed methods
 Dapat mengkaji huungan struktural dan
agensi/structure interfaces








Data sensus
Data nasional
National statistical returns (eg Crime statistics for HO)
Hasil-hasil penelitian yang dipublikasikan
Survei lokal (data primer)
Local statistics (secondary/primary data)
Data yang terbatas tentang anak-anak.
Pertanyaan Penelitian
 Spesifik (hypotheses)
 Determined at start by outside ‘experts’/prior
research
 Dibatasi oleh apa yang tersedia , mis. area; unit
analisis.

Using a mixed methods approach
 Interface between micro and macro
dimensions of physical safety,
distributions of risk, violence
 Would need primary data to capture
distributions of management strategies

Mengkombinasikan
metode/data/analysis sedemikian rupa
sehingga:
 Mereka membentuk satu kesatuan
 Menjaga sifat0sifat paradigmatiknya
masing-masing (tidak mencampur-adukkan
satu-sama lain)
 Menghasilkan kontribusi yang sama nilainya
▪ Integrasi sejak
awal riset
▪ Selama
pengumpulan data
▪ Melalui Analisis
Data
▪ Melalui
Interpretasi
▪ Sebagai hasil
Presentasi
Monodata-multianalysis—this is the
analysis of one type of data using both
qualitative and quantitative anslysis.
The logic of this approach is to:
1. Analyze your data with the standard
approach (e.g., qualitative analysis for your
qualitative data or quantitative analysis for
your quantitative data).
2. Either qualitative or quantitize one set of
data for additional analysis.
1. Qualitize—transforming quantitative data
into qualitative data (e.g., provide names or
labels to quantitative characteristics).
2. Quantitize—transforming qualitative data
into quantitative data (e.g., do numerical
counts of qualitative categories and themes).
Diunduh dari: www.sagepub.com/.../notes/Ch19_Lecture.do... …… 26/10/2012
MMR:
Riset yang menggunakan prosedur –
prosedur pelaksanaan yang lazim
digunakan dalam riset kuantitatif
dan riset kualitatif.
Diunduh dari:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18058748/Multi-Method-Research…… 21/9/2012
Tujuan
The purpose of these studies is usually to inform sponsors
about a program they are funding.
The sponsors may want a descriptive study of the program
in which the operations and processes are explained and
clarified.
They may also be interested in an effectiveness study in
which the operations are assessed in relation to
organizational goals and targets.
Diunduh dari:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18058748/Multi-Method-Research…… 21/9/2012
METODE-METODE
Masalah-penelitian akan menentukan pilihan desain,
tetapi beberapa metode berikut ini dapat digunakan:
Survei
Kunjungan lokasi.
Wawancara
Observasi
Questionnaires
Data Quantitatif.
Diunduh dari:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18058748/Multi-Method-Research…… 21/9/2012
Tiga Tipe Desain
Tiga karaktersitik yang membedakan tipe-tipe MMR:
1. Priooritas diberikan pada pengumpulan data
kuantitatif atau kualitatif.
2. Sekuens pengumpulan data kuantitatif atau
kualitatif
3. Teknik-teknik analisis data yang dipakai adalah
kombinasi analisis data atau analisis data sendirisendiri.
Diunduh dari:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18058748/Multi-Method-Research…… 21/9/2012
Tiga tipe Desain yang lazim:
1. Model QUAL-Quan
The exploratory mixed methods design
Qualitative data are collected first and are more heavily weighted
2. Model QUAN-Qual
The explanatory mixed methods design
Quantitative data are collected first and are more heavily weighted
3. Model QUAN-QUAL
The triangulation mixed methods design
Quantitative and qualitative data are collectedc oncurrently and both
are weighted equally
Diunduh dari:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18058748/Multi-Method-Research…… 21/9/2012
10 Karakteristik Desain MM
1. The title of the research includes terms that
suggest more than one method is being used
• Mixed methods
• Integrated
• Triangular
2. Quantitative – qualitative
Both quantitative and qualitative methods are used
in the study
Diunduh dari:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18058748/Multi-Method-Research…… 21/9/2012
Characteristics of Mixed Methods Designs
3. The researcher describes the kinds of mixed methods being used
4. The data collection section indicates narrative, numerical, or both
types of data are being collected
5. The purpose statement or the research questions indicate the types of
methods being used
6. Questions are stated and described for both quantitative and
qualitative approaches
7. The researcher indicates these quencing of collecting qualitative
and/or quantitative data (i.e., QUAN-Qual, QUAL-Quan, or QUANQUAL)
8. The researcher describes both quantitative and qualitative data
analysis strategies
9. The writing is balanced in terms of quantitative and qualitative
approaches
Diunduh dari:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18058748/Multi-Method-Research…… 21/9/2012
Evaluating a Mixed Methods Design
1. Does the study use at least one quantitative and one
qualitative research strategy?
2. What were the research questions addressed?
3. Who are the sponsors of the study and what are their
expectations?
4. Does the study include a rationale for using a mixed
methods design?
5. Does the study include a classification of the type of
mixed methods design?
6. Does the study describe the priority given to quantitative
and qualitative data collection and the sequence of their
use?
Diunduh dari:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18058748/Multi-Method-Research…… 21/9/2012
Evaluasi Disain Mixed-Method
1. Was the study feasible given the amount of data to be
collected and concomitant issues of resources, time, and
expertise?
2. Who were the participants in the study? What did the
samples consist of?
3. Does the study clearly identify qualitative and quantitative
data collection techniques?
4. Apa tujuan dan pentingnya riset ini?
Diunduh dari:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18058748/Multi-Method-Research…… 21/9/2012
A mixed method approach allows researchers to simultaneously benefit from both
quantitative and qualitative research methods in the context of one study
addressing a single set of business objectives.
Flow Monitor designs market research studies that take full advantage of the
inherent benefits of both quantitative (e.g., surveys) and qualitative (e.g., focus
groups, ethnographic techniques, etc.) research.
The business objectives will greatly determine the appropriate sequence of
methods. The diagrams below illustrate this.
Diunduh dari:
http://www.flowmonitorinc.com/how-we-do-it.html …… 21/9/2012
Diunduh dari:
http://blogpdf.com/mixed-methods-research---sample-heading-text-48913293……
21/9/2012





Mixed methods research is not new but only recently been
systematically described; ‘new era’ of mixed methods research
(Tashakkori and Teddlie, 1998)
Different definitions of mixed methods research used by
different researchers
Not simply the ad hoc combination of qualitative and
quantitative methods, it is the planned mixing of methods at a
pre- determined stage of the research (Halcomb et al., 2009)
“mixed methods [is] research which collects both qualitative
and quantitative data in one study and integrates these data at
some stage of the research process” (Halcomb et al., 2009)
Distinction between mixed methods (quant and qual) and multi
method research (uses more than one method from same
tradition) (Bazeley, 2007)
Diunduh dari: www2.warwick.ac.uk/.../what_is_mixed_meth... …… 21/9/2012




Increased reflexivity about researcher-researched relationships

The availability and ease of new technologies to analyse mixed
methods research (e.g. Nvivo, MaxQDA, Atlas.ti)

International Research Collaboration
Increased political awareness about what and who research is for
Growing formalisation of research governance and ethics
procedures
(Halcomb and Andrew, 2009)
Diunduh dari: www2.warwick.ac.uk/.../what_is_mixed_meth... …… 21/9/2012
Triangulation - one of the first rationales for using mixed
methods research (Denzin, 1970). Used to test the consistency of
findings through different approaches.
 Complementarity - clarifies and illustrates results from one
method with the use of another method.
 Development - the results of analysis using one method shapes
subsequent methods or steps in the research process.
 Initiation-stimulates new research questions or challenges results
obtained through one method.
 Expansion- provides richness and detail buy building on the
findings of either qualitative or quantitative methods
(Greene et al., 1989)

Diunduh dari: www2.warwick.ac.uk/.../what_is_mixed_meth... …… 21/9/2012
Four central questions that inform the design of a mixed methods
study:
1.
2.
3.
4.
In what sequence will the qualitative and quantitative data
collection be implemented?
What relative priority will be given to the qualitative and
quantitative data collection and analysis?
At what stage of the project will the qualitative and
quantitative data be integrated?
Will an overall theoretical perspective be used to guide the
study?
(Creswell, 2003)
Diunduh dari: www2.warwick.ac.uk/.../what_is_mixed_meth... …… 21/9/2012
1.
2.
3.
4.
Principal Quantitative, Qualitative Preliminary (qual ->
QUANT)
Principal Qualitative, Quantitative Preliminary (quant > QUAL)
Complementary Quantitative, Qualitative Follow-Up
(QUANT -> qual)
Complementary Qualitative, Quantitative Follow-Up
(QUAL -> quant)
(Morse, 1991; Morgan, 1998)
Diunduh dari: www2.warwick.ac.uk/.../what_is_mixed_meth... …… 21/9/2012
Interviews/ Focus Groups/ Questionnaires/
Surveys/ Validated Tests and Scales/
Observation
Pertimbangannya:
1. Keseimbangan antara kelebihan dan
kelemahan masiong-masing metode
2. Waktu pengumpulan data
Diunduh dari: www2.warwick.ac.uk/.../what_is_mixed_meth... …… 21/9/2012
Qualitative and quantitative data sets analysed separately and
conclusions drawn that incorporate both data sets.
Can be used for the following purposes:
1.
2.
3.
Triangulation
Expansion or Complementarity
Development
Separate analyses may give rise to contradictory or discrepant
results which need to be explained
(Halcomb and Andrew, 2009)
Diunduh dari: www2.warwick.ac.uk/.../what_is_mixed_meth... …… 21/9/2012
Combining of data types for analysis requires transformation of data
in some form in order to ‘marry’ diverse sources.
Can be done through:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Meta matrices, databases, spread sheets e.g. systematic
reviews
Qualitising numerical data e.g. using scores to provide a
descriptive classification
Counting
Quantitising qualitative data e.g. 0/1 transformation for
absence/presence of code, numerical weighting of codes
(MaxQDA)
(Halcomb and Andrew, 2009)
Diunduh dari: www2.warwick.ac.uk/.../what_is_mixed_meth... …… 21/9/2012
Combined analysis can be used to:
Merge and compare (e.g. themes can be quantified,
independent t tests and bivariate linear regression
analyses in SPSS)
2. Explore, predict and explain (e.g. case by case variable
matrix, cluster analysis)
3. Blend to created new variable to use in further studies
(Halcomb and Andrew, 2009)

1.
Diunduh dari: www2.warwick.ac.uk/.../what_is_mixed_meth... …… 21/9/2012







‘paradigm wars’, reconciling philosophical assumptions of each
methodological perspective.
Selecting and managing research team with diverse specialities.
Practicalities of data collection and analysis, may make concurrent
analysis difficult
Statistical analysis often relies on large sample sizes which are not
common in qualitative research
Transforming qualitative data into numerical form may lose some of
the richness and nuances in the text
A lack of templates for the writing up and publishing mixed methods
research, sometimes qualitative and quantitative results published
separately
Not all journals publish mixed methods research which may limit
publication opportunities
Diunduh dari: www2.warwick.ac.uk/.../what_is_mixed_meth... …… 21/9/2012
Gives researchers an opportunity to creatively rethink
research design and the various different ways they can
be linked to research questions
 Potential to generate new insights and levels of analysis
 Challenges taken for granted assumptions across a wide
range of research methods topics
 Brings together researchers from different backgrounds
and different specialisms and allows them to think
together on a given research problem
(Bergman, 2008)

Diunduh dari: www2.warwick.ac.uk/.../what_is_mixed_meth... …… 21/9/2012
Diunduh dari:
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/fig/94_10_1108_S1479-3679_2011_0000015014.png……
26/10/2012
Sumber: Elham Ahmadnezhad, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Nov. 2009

1959: Concept of mixing different methods by Campbell & Fiske.
(Psychologists)

1973: Combined the Qualitative & Quantitative data by S.D. Sieber.

1979:
Converging
or
triangulating
different
Qualitative
&
Quantitative data sources by Jick.

1989-2003: Expanded procedures for Mixed methods By Tashakkori
& Teddli and then Creswell.
Sumber: Elham Ahmadnezhad, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Nov. 2009

Quantitative data can reveal generalizable information for a large
group of people
 These data often fail to provide specific answers, reasons,
explanations or examples

Qualitative research provides data about meaning and context
regarding the people and environments of study
 Findings are often not generalizable because of the small
numbers & narrow range of participants

Both methods have strengths and weaknesses
 When used together, these methods can be complimentary
Sumber: Elham Ahmadnezhad, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Nov. 2009
Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Methods
Quantitative
research
Methods
Qualitative
research
Methods
Mixed Methods
Research
Methods
• Experimental
• Narratives
• Sequential
designs
•Phenomenologies •Concurrent
•Non-
•Ethnographies
Experimental
•Grounded theory
designs, such as
•Case Studies
•Transformative
survey
Sumber: Elham Ahmadnezhad, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Nov. 2009
Four decisions go into selecting a mixed methods strategy
Implement
ation
Priority
No Sequence
Concurrent
Equal
Integration
At data collection
SequentialQualitative
first
Qualitative
At data analysis
At data
interpretation
SequentialQualitative
first
Quantitative
With some
combination
Theoretical
Perspective
Explicit
Implicit
Sumber: Elham Ahmadnezhad, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Nov. 2009

What is implementation sequence of the quantitative and
qualitative data collection in the proposed study?

What priority will be given to the quantitative and
qualitative data collection and analysis?

At what stage in the research project will the quantitative
and qualitative data and finding be integrated?

Will an overall theoretical perspective (e.g., gender, race/
ethnicity, lifestyle, class) be used in the study?
Sumber: Elham Ahmadnezhad, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Nov. 2009
Sequential Explanatory Design
QUAN Data Collection
QUAN Data Analysis
Qual Data Collection
Qual Data Analysis
Interpretation of Entre analysis
Sumber: Elham Ahmadnezhad, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Nov. 2009
Sequential Exploratory Design
QUAL Data Collection
QUAL Data Analysis
Quan Data Collection
Quan Data Analysis
Interpretation of Entre Analysis
Sumber: Elham Ahmadnezhad, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Nov. 2009
Sequential Transformative Design
QUAL
quan
Vision, Advocacy, Ideology, Framework
QUAN
qual
Vision, Advocacy, Ideology, Framwork
Sumber: Elham Ahmadnezhad, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Nov. 2009
Concurrent Triangulation Strategy
QUAN
QUAL Data Collection
Quan Data
Analysis
QUAL
QUAN Data Collection
Qual Data Analysid
Data Results
Compared
Sumber: Elham Ahmadnezhad, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Nov. 2009
Concurrent Nested Strategy
Analysis of Findings
Analysis of Findings
Sumber: Elham Ahmadnezhad, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Nov. 2009
Concurrent Transformative Strategy
Sumber: Elham Ahmadnezhad, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Nov. 2009


Identify and be specific about the type of data. Some forms
of data such as interviews and observations can be either
quantitative or qualitative. Although reduction information
to numbers is the approach used in quantitative research, it
is also used in qual. Research.
Recognize that quantitative data often involve random
sampling, so that each individual has no equal probability
of being selected and the sample can be generalized to the
larger population. In qualitative data collection, purposeful
sampling is used to that individuals are selected because
they have experienced the central phenomenon.
Sumber: Elham Ahmadnezhad, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Nov. 2009

Relate the procedures specifically to the visual
model. For e.g, in a sequential explanatory
model, the general procedures can be detailed
even further. A discussion of this approach might
include describing the use of survey data
collection followed by both descriptive and
infertial data analysis in the first phase. Then
qualitative observations and coding and thematic
analysis within an ethnographic design might be
mentioned for the second phase.
Sumber: Elham Ahmadnezhad, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Nov. 2009
It’s related to the type of research strategy chosen for the
procedures. Some of the more popular approaches:
Data transformation:
In the concurrent strategies involve creating codes and
themes qualitatively, then counting the number of
times they occur in the text data. This quantification of
qualitative data enables a researcher to compare
quantitative results with the qualitative data. For
instance, in a factor analysis of data from a scale on an
instrument, the researcher may create factors or
themes that then can be compared with themes from
the qualitative database.
Sumber: Elham Ahmadnezhad, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Nov. 2009
Explore outliers: In a sequential model, an analysis of quantitative
data in the first phase can yield extreme or outlier cases. Follow-up
qualitative interviews with these outlier cases can provide insight
about why they diverged from the quantitative sample.
 Instrument development: In a sequential approach, obtain themes
and specific statements from participants in an initial qualitative
data collection. In the next phase, use these statements as specific
items and the themes for scales to create a survey instrument that is
grounded in the views of the participants. A third, final phase might
be to validate the instrument with large sample representative of a
population.
 Examine multiple levels: in a concurrent nested model, conduct a
survey at one level (e.g. with families) to gather quantitative results
about a sample. At the same time, collect qualitative interviews
(e.g., with individuals) to explore the phenomenon with specific
individuals in families.

Sumber: Elham Ahmadnezhad, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Nov. 2009
Validasi diperlukan, baik pada fase kualitatif
maupun fase kuantitatif.
Masing-masing metode mempunyai cara
khusus; untuk data kualitatif, strateginya
adalah menguji akurasi temuan-temuan
riset.
Sumber: Elham Ahmadnezhad, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Nov. 2009
by John W. Creswell, Ph.D.
Department of Educational Psychology,
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Co-editor, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, and
Co-Director, Office of Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research

Deskripsikan pendekatan ini dalam proposalpenelitian
 Pelacakan sejarahnya
 Definisi yang jelas
▪ Mixed methods research is an approach to inquiry that combines
or associates both qualitative and quantitative forms. It involves
philosophical assumptions, the use of qualitative and quantitative
approaches, and the mixing of both approaches in a study. Thus, it
is more than simply collecting and analyzing both kinds of data; it
also involves the use of both approaches in tandem so that the
overall strength of a study is greater than either qualitative or
quantitative research (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2007).
 Membahas tantangan yang dihadapi pendekatan ini.
Sumber: by John W. Creswell, Ph.D. Department of Educational Psychology, University of NebraskaLincoln
Timing
Weighting
Mixing
Theorizing
No Sequence
Concurrent
Equal
Integrating
Explicit
Sequential Qualitative
first
Qualitative
Connecting
Implicit
Sequential Quantitative
first
Quantitative
Embedding
Sumber: by John W. Creswell, Ph.D. Department of Educational Psychology, University of NebraskaLincoln
Timing
Weighting
Mixing
Theorizing
No Sequence
Concurrent
Equal
Integrating
Explicit
Sequential Qualitative
first
Qualitative
Connecting
Implicit
Sequential Quantitative
first
Quantitative
Embedding
Sumber: by John W. Creswell, Ph.D. Department of Educational Psychology, University of NebraskaLincoln

Disain Eksplanatori Sekuensial
QUAN

Disain Eksploratori Sekuensial
QUAL

qual
quan
Dian Transformatis Sekuensial
QUAL
quan
Social science theory, qualitative theory, advocacy worldview
QUAN
qual
Social science theory, qualitative theory, advocacy worldview
Sumber: by John W. Creswell, Ph.D. Department of Educational Psychology, University of NebraskaLincoln

Disain Triangulasi Konkuren (bersamaan)
QUAN


+
QUAL
Disain Embedded Konkuren
qual
quan
QUAN
QUAL
Disain Transformatif Konkuren
QUAN + QUAL
Social science theory, qualitative
theory, advocacy worldview
quan
QUAL
Social science theory,
qualitative theory, advocacy
worldview
Sumber: by John W. Creswell, Ph.D. Department of Educational Psychology, University of NebraskaLincoln



Identifikasi tipe-tipe data quantitative dan
qualitatif
Menyusun prosedur sampling yang dapat
mencakup aspek-aspek random-sampling
dan purposeful-sampling
Membuat bagan / diagram alir yang detail
tentang penelitian
Sumber: by John W. Creswell, Ph.D. Department of Educational Psychology, University of NebraskaLincoln


Match data analysis to the mixed methods strategy of
inquiry
Prosedur-prosedur yang populer meliputi :






Transformasi Data
Explore outliers
Instrument development
Examine multiple levels
Membuat Matriks.
Prosedur Validasi:
 Quantitative procedures (e.g., validity and reliability of scores)
 Qualitative procedures (e.g., check accuracy of findings)
 Mixed methods procedures (e.g., legitimation of the mixed
methods study)
Sumber: by John W. Creswell, Ph.D. Department of Educational Psychology, University of NebraskaLincoln

Report structure follows from the mixed
methods strategy of inquiry
 Studi Sequential :
▪ Organize the report into sections ordered to match
the phases of the study
 Studi Konkuren :
▪ Organize the data collection into separate sections
▪ The analysis and interpretation may be combined
 Studi Transformatif:
▪ Use either a sequential or concurrent report structure
▪ Advance the advocacy issue at the beginning and an
agenda for change at the end
Sumber: by John W. Creswell, Ph.D. Department of Educational Psychology, University of NebraskaLincoln
by John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Andrews University, July, 2004
Data Teks Kualitatif
Data numerik
kuantitatif
This is a sample of a text
file of words that might be
collected on transcripts
through interviews,
fieldnotes from
observations, or from
optically-scanned
documents.
2342543112232132
23322543
3122432432132433
32334441
2222111432143213
22111555
2331432432132433
32135432
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004

Data Kuantitatif
 Close-ended scales
 Attitudinal/behavioral
scales
 Behavioral checklists
 Census, attendance
records

Data Kualitatif
 Open-ended responses
 Semi-structured
interviews
 Semi-structured
observations
 Records/documents
 Videotapes
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
Together quantitative and qualitative data provide both
precise measurement and generalizability of quantitative
research and the in-depth, complex picture of qualitative
research
2. To validate quantitative results with qualitative data
3. We do not have an adequate instrument. Thus, we need to
explore views and develop an instrument
4. Our quantitative data provide a general explanation and we
need to follow-up with participants and have them explain
the quantitative results
5. In our experiment, outcomes to be measured are not
enough; they need to be complemented by understanding
the process of participants
1.
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
We need minimum skills in both qualitative and
quantitative data collection. What do we need?
2. We need time and resources for extensive data
collection and analysis. How much time and
resources do we need?
1.
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
Data Kuantitatif
Data Kualitatif
Mixing: converging the data or connecting the data
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
Mencampur/ Memadukan data :
Qual
Results
Quan
Menghubungkan data:
Qual
Quan
Results
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
“Combining qualitative and quantitative methods
has gained broad appeal in public health research.
The key question has become not whether it is
acceptable or legitimate to combine methods,
but rather how they will be combined to be
mutually supportive and how findings achieved
through different methods will be integrated.”
(NIH, Office of Behavioral and Social Science
Research, 1999).
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
Mixed methods research is a design for collecting,
analyzing, and mixing both quantitative and
qualitative data in a single study or series of
studies to understand a research problem.
2. The purpose of this form of research is that both
qualitative and quantitative methods, in
combination, provide a better understanding of a
research problem or issue than either method
alone.
1.
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
Single Study:
Quan
Qual
Results
Multiple Studies (called multimethod research):
Quan
Study 1
Qual
Study 2
Qual
Study 3
Quan
Study 4
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
Worldviews, theoretical frameworks, problem and research
question, skills, resources
Type of mixed methods design
Procedures for:
•designing the title
•writing the introduction to a study
•writing the purpose statement and research
questions/hypotheses
•data collection
•data analysis
•writing the mixed methods report
•evaluating the mixed methods research
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
Disain apa
yang
mungkin
sesuai?
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
I. Triangulation Mixed Methods Design
QUAN
Data and Results
+
QUAL
Data and Results
Interpretation
II. Nested Mixed Methods Design
QUAN
Pre-test
Data and Results
Qual Process
QUAN
Post-test
Data and Results
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
III. MMR Eksplanatori
QUAN
Data and Results
Follow-up
qual
Data and Results
IV. MMR Eksploratori
QUAL
Data and Results
Building
quan
Data and Results
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004





Collecting both quantitative and qualitative data
Collecting these data at the same time in the research
procedure
Analyzing the quantitative and qualitative data separately
Comparing or combining the results of the quantitative
and qualitative analysis
Example: collect survey data (quantitative) and collect
individual interviews (qualitative) and then compare the
results
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
When you want to combine the advantages of
quantitative (trends, large numbers,
generalization) with qualitative (detail, small
numbers, in-depth)
2. When you want to validate your quantitative
findings with qualitative data
3. When you want to expand your quantitative
findings with some open-ended qualitative data
(e.g., survey with closed- and open-ended data)
1.
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004




Collecting both quantitative and qualitative data
Collecting both types of data at the same time
Having ONE form of data play a smaller role in the study
than the other form of data
Also,
 Using one form of data to answer one question; the other form
another question
 Collecting one form of data at one level of analysis and another at
another level of analysis

Example: You conduct an experiment and during the
experiment you gather qualitative interview data. The
outcomes of the experiment assessed quantitatively
address different questions than the process of the
experiment explored qualitatively.
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004



When you do not have time or resources to
commit to extensive quantitative and
qualitative data collection
When you want to study the process of an
experiment as well as the outcomes
When you want to examine different levels in
an organization
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
Nested Research Design
Eksperimen
Quan
Data collection
Pre-test
Intervention
Quan
Data collection
Post-test
Process – collection
and analysis of qualitative
data
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
Viewing the study as a two-phase project
Collecting quantitative data first followed by
collecting qualitative data second
 Typically, a greater emphasis is placed on the
quantitative data in the study
 Example: You first conduct a survey and then
follow up with a few individuals who answered
positively to the questions through interviews


Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004


When you want to explain the quantitative
results in more depth with qualitative data
(e.g., statistical differences among groups,
individuals who scored at extreme levels)
When you want to identify appropriate
participants to study in more depth
qualitatively
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
Contoh Disain Eksplanatori
Quantitative
Data Collection
(quan)
Quantitative
Data Analysis
(quan)
Case Selection
Qualitative
Data Analysis
(QUAL)
Quantitative Analysis
Case Selection
Qualitative Analysis
Interpretation –
based on quan
and QUAL results
+
Qualitative
Data Collection
Quantitative Data*
Number of cigarettes
CES-D6
Qualitative Data*
Semi-structured
interviews, audio
recorded and
transcribed
Graphic plot of CES
D6 scores over time
for each participant
Graphic plot of
cigarettes/day values
over time for each
participant
* Data collected 10 times
over the course of a
calendar year for 40
participants
Selected 5 cases
maximally varying
Identified critical
months in which
smoking varied
Description of each
case
Identification of life
events occurring
during critical
months where
smoking increased or
decreased
Thematic analysis of
life events for each
case
Cross-case thematic
analysis
Interpretation
Why did changes in
smoking occur?
Creswell et al. (in progress)
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
Viewing the study as a two-phase project
Qualitative data collection precedes quantitative
data collection
 Typically, greater emphasis is placed on the
qualitative data in the study
 Example: You collect qualitative diary entries,
analyze the data for themes, and then develop an
instrument based on the themes to measure
attitudes on a quantitative survey administered
to a large sample.


Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004



To develop an instrument when one is not
available (first explore, then develop
instrument)
To develop a classification or typology for
testing
To identify the most important variables to
study quantitatively when these variable
are not known
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
Phase I Qualitative Research - Year 1
Qualitative Data Collection
Qualitative Data Analysis
Qualitative Findings
Phase II Quantitative Research - Year 2
Quantitative Instrument Development
Unstructured Interviews 50 participants
8 observations at the site
16 documents
Text Analysis: Using QSR N6
Development of codes and themes
for each site
Create approximately a 80-item
instrument plus demographics
Administer survey to 500 individuals
Quantitative Test of the Instrument
Quantitative Results
Determine factor structure of items and
conduct reliability analysis for scales
Determine how groups differ
using ANOVA test
Sequential Exploratory Mixed Methods Design
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
Types of analysis:
 Quantitative
analysis

Qualitative analysis
 Text/image data
 Numeric data
 Coding
 Descriptive trend
 Themes
analysis
 Hypothesis testing,
effect size, interval
estimates
 Description
 Interrelated themes
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
QUAN
data collection
• Separate QUAN
and QUAL data
analysis
QUAL
data collection
QUAN
data analysis
• Two options
• Data transformation (change
QUAL to QUAN or QUAN to QUAL)
• Comparison (keep separate and
compare/contrast)
QUAL
data analysis
Results
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
Contoh transformasi data dari “satuan teks” menjadi “satuan numerik”
Count
Adj.Count**
Row Pct
Column Pct
Patients
N=2
Physicians
N=4
Medical
Assistants
N=4
Familiarity
With the Form
13
6.5
41.9
5.8
17
4.25
27.4
3.0
19
4.75
30.7
5.3
49
15.5
100.0
Reactions to the Form
23
11.5
22.2
10.2
100
25.0
48.3
17.4
61
15.3
29.5
16.9
184
51.75
100.0
Use for Managing
Depression
67
33.5
38.6
29.8
177
44.25
51.0
30.7
36
9.0
10.4
10.0
280
86.75
100.0
Changes to the Form
115
57.5
37.5
51.1
196
49.0
32.0
34.0
187
46.8
30.5
51.7
498
153.3
100.0
Themes
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
7
86
58 2004
Situational Use ofUniversity
the
of Nebraska-Lincoln
and Andrews
University, July,
151
Analisis Data Tersarang (Nested)
Quantitative Experiment
Quan
Data collection
Pre-test
Intervention
Quan
Data collection
Post-test
Qualitative Process
Data
Analysis
Pre-test
scores
Themes/Codes/
Interrelated Themes
Post-test scores
or gain scores
Compare/Describe Results
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
QUAN
data analysis
Qual
data collection
(purposeful sampling)
• Statistical results
• Outlier cases
• Extreme cases
•
•
•
•
Select cases based on s.d. variables
Select cases to represent outliers
Select cases to represent extreme cases
Select cases to make group comparisons
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
Qual
analysis
• codes
• themes
• cases
QUAL data analysis
Quan data analysis
instrument development
Quotes
Items on a survey
Codes
Variables on a survey
Themes
Scales on a survey
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004






Let’s draw a picture of our design
Identify the type of design
Add in data collection
Add in data analysis
Show the flow of activities
Add in “products” for our audiences
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Give a title to the visual model.
Choose either horizontal or vertical layout for the model.
Draw boxes for quantitative and qualitative stages of data
collection, data analysis and interpretation of the study results.
Use capitalized (QUAN) or small letters (quan) to designate
priority of quantitative and qualitative data collection and
analysis.
Use single-headed arrows to show the flow of procedures in the
design.
Specify procedures for each quantitative and qualitative data
collection and analysis stage.
Specify expected products or outcomes of each quantitative and
qualitative data collection and analysis procedure.
Make your model simple.
Size your model to one page.
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
Sample Script for a Concurrent Design
(Triangulation or Nested)
“The purpose of this concurrent mixed methods study is
to better understand a research problem by converging
both quantitative (numeric) and qualitative (text or image)
data. In this approach, ___________ (quantitative
instruments) will be used to measure the relationship
between the ________ (independent variables) and
__________ (dependent variables).
At the same time in the study, the __________ (central
phenomenon) will be explored using _____________
(qualitative interviews, documents, observations, visual
materials) with _________ (participants) at ____________
(the research site).”
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
Sample Script for a Sequential Exploratory Design
“The purpose of this two-phase, exploratory mixed methods study will be to
explore participant views with the intent of using this information to develop
and test an instrument with a sample from a population. The first phase
will be a qualitative exploration of a _______(central phenomenon) by
collecting ___________(data) from ____________ (participants) at
_______ (research site). Themes from this qualitative data will then be
developed into an instrument (or survey) so that the __________ (theory
and research questions/hypotheses) can be tested that ________ (relate,
compare) ____________ (independent variable) with __________
(dependent variable) for _________(sample of a population) at _________
(research site).”
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
Sample Script for a Sequential Explanatory Design
“The purpose of this two-phase, explanatory mixed methods study will be
to obtain statistical, quantitative results from a sample and then follow-up
with a few individuals to probe or explore those results in more depth. In
the first phase, quantitative research questions or hypotheses will
address the relationship or comparison of __________ (independent) and
________ (dependent) variables with ___________ (participants) at
___________(the research site). In the second phase, qualitative
interviews or observations will be used to problem significant
_______(quantitative results) by exploring aspects of the ________
(central phenomenon) with
_______ (a few participants) at ____________ (research site).”
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004




Use appropriate
terminology for title and
design
Provide a rationale for
mixing and include it
early in the study (“when
you use…”)
Create a mixed methods
purpose statement
Identify types of qual and
quan data to be collected
and qual and quan data
analysis steps


Include a
visual/procedural
diagram of methods
with timeline
Use rigorous procedures
for the quantitative
data collection and
analysis
Sumber: John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Andrews University, July, 2004
Diunduh dari:
http://img.blogpdf.com/30/30230340-big-2.jpg…… 26/10/2012
Sumber: Richard Watson Todd (http://arts.kmutt.ac.th/crs/research/mmda.ppt)



Riset Kuantitatif murni
Riset Kualitatif Murni
MMR = Mixed-methods research
 Collecting both QUANT and QUAL data using
different instruments

MMDA = Mixed-methods data analysis
 Usually only QUAL data collected
 Data is treated both quantitatively and
qualitatively

Sumber: Richard Watson Todd (http://arts.kmutt.ac.th/crs/research/mmda.ppt)


QUANT – QUAL distinction in applied
linguistics research
QUANT: data is numbers; uses statistics
 Experimental research; surveys

QUAL: data is words; uses thematic or
narrative interpretation
 Conversation analysis; ethnography

Sumber: Richard Watson Todd (http://arts.kmutt.ac.th/crs/research/mmda.ppt)

“MMR melibatkan pengumpulan atau analisis
data kuantitatif dan kualitatif dalam suatu
studi dengan upaya mengintegrasikan kedua
pendekatan pada satu fase atau lebih dalam
proses penelitiannya” (Dörnyei, 2007)

Tujuan:
 Mencapai pemahaman yang tuntas
 Triangulasi temuan-temuan.

Sumber: Richard Watson Todd (http://arts.kmutt.ac.th/crs/research/mmda.ppt)

Contoh yang jelek
 Research into attitudes: survey a large number
and interview a predetermined small number of
subjects
 Purpose: unclear

Contoh yang agak lebih baik
 Research into attitudes: survey a large number
of subjects, then, selecting based on
questionnaire responses, interview a small
number
 Purpose: follow-up on interesting results

Sumber: Richard Watson Todd (http://arts.kmutt.ac.th/crs/research/mmda.ppt)

An example of the opposite
 Interview a small number to gain insights to
design a questionnaire, then survey a large
number
 Purpose: informing instrument design

Another similar example
 Research into beliefs: interview 4 teachers but
survey 80 students
 Purpose: accounting for practicality in using
instruments

Sumber: Richard Watson Todd (http://arts.kmutt.ac.th/crs/research/mmda.ppt)

Contoh yang fokus pada triangulasi
 Research into strategies: comparing results from




different instruments
Much strategy research involves the use of SILL
SILL asks respondents to identify how often they
use a particular strategy
Strategy use is context-dependent
Research question: Will recent context of learning
change responses to SILL?

Sumber: Richard Watson Todd (http://arts.kmutt.ac.th/crs/research/mmda.ppt)

Metode
 Subyek tunggal
 Time 1: read academic articles
 Time 2: read short stories for pleasure
 Responded to SILL twice
 Interviewed 4 times (background interview,
after SILL responses, summary interview)

Sumber: Richard Watson Todd (http://arts.kmutt.ac.th/crs/research/mmda.ppt)

SILL responses
 Showed major differences between 2 times e.g. “If I guess
the meaning of a word, later I will check whether my guess is
correct by using a dictionary.” rated Always at Time 1; Never
at Time 2

Interview responses
 Showed that recent learning contexts influenced different
ratings

Triangulation to confirm results or triangulation to
provide different perspectives

Sumber: Richard Watson Todd (http://arts.kmutt.ac.th/crs/research/mmda.ppt)
“The most common perception of mixed methods research
is that it is a modular process in which qualitative and
quantitative components are carried out either
concurrently or sequentially.
Although this perception is by and large true, it also
suggests that the analysis of the data should proceed
independently for the QUANT and QUAL phases and
mixing should occur only at the final interpretation stage.
This conclusion is only partially true … we can also start
integrating the data at the analysis stage, resulting in
what can be called mixed methods data analysis”
Dörnyei (2007)

Sumber: Richard Watson Todd (http://arts.kmutt.ac.th/crs/research/mmda.ppt)

MMDA
berarti:
 Quantitising
qualitative
data
 Qualitising
quantitative
data

Monodata-multianalysis—this is the
analysis of one type of data using both
qualitative and quantitative anslysis.
The logic of this approach is to:
First, analyze your data with the standard
approach (e.g., qualitative analysis for your
qualitative data or quantitative analysis for your
quantitative data).
Second, either qualitative or quantitize one set
of data for additional analysis.
Qualitize—transforming quantitative data into
qualitative data (e.g., provide names or labels to
quantitative characteristics).
Quantitize—transforming qualitative data into
quantitative data (e.g., do numerical counts of
qualitative categories and themes).
Sumber: Richard Watson Todd (http://arts.kmutt.ac.th/crs/research/mmda.ppt)

Kuantifikasi seringkali dilakukan secara tidak
sadar
 Melakukan analisis “keyword”
 Menggunakan skor IELTS dalam riset



Quantitising helps a qualitative analysis by
allowing a reliability check
Quantitising can be used to count and compare
frequency of themes
Quantitising allows further statistical analysis of
data, but information is always lost when
converting QUAL to QUANT

Sumber: Richard Watson Todd (http://arts.kmutt.ac.th/crs/research/mmda.ppt)
Tidak lazim,
jarang dilakukan
 Penyusunan
profil naratif

Program name and Website address
AnSWR (freeware)
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/software/answr.htm
ATLAS
 Using
quantitatively
obtained
questionnaire
data in a
qualitative
description of a
subject

Websites for Qualitative Data Analysis Programs
http://atlasti.de/
Ethnograph
http://qualisresearch.com
HyperResearch
Nvivo
http://researchware.com
http://www.qsrinternational.com
NUD*IST http://www.qsrinternational.com/products_previousproducts_n6.aspx (Note: NUD*IST is being replaced by
NVivo).
Sumber: Richard Watson Todd (http://arts.kmutt.ac.th/crs/research/mmda.ppt)

Sifat Data of QUANT
 Ringkas
 Memnungkinkan analisis lanjut (Statistika
inferensial)
 Menyediakan informasi ringkas (ikhtisar)

Sifat Data QUAL
 Detail dan informatif
 Memungkinkan pemahaman kasus-kasus
 Menyediakan informasi yang mendalam

Sumber: Richard Watson Todd (http://arts.kmutt.ac.th/crs/research/mmda.ppt)

What purposes can mixing QUANT and
QUAL data analysis serve?
 Illustration for insight
 Concise summary to give overview
 Preliminary overview to inform analysis
 Providing a more well-rounded and more
persuasive analysis

Sumber: Richard Watson Todd (http://arts.kmutt.ac.th/crs/research/mmda.ppt)



In many QUANT studies, it is easy to get lost in
the numbers and forget what they mean
If the numbers are derived from QUAL data, it
is useful to give a QUAL example to concretise
the QUANT findings
In Case 1, the original data is QUAL; this is
quantitised for analysis; a QUAL example is
given to concretise the data and to show how
the quantitative analyses was applied

Sumber: Richard Watson Todd (http://arts.kmutt.ac.th/crs/research/mmda.ppt)



In some QUAL research (primarily involving
categorisation or thematisation), the
lengthy, detailed data make it difficult to see
the overall pattern
It can be useful to provide a QUANT
summary as an overview
In Case 2, the data is QUAL and analysed in a
QUAL way, but the overall pattern of results
is presented as QUANT

Sumber: Richard Watson Todd (http://arts.kmutt.ac.th/crs/research/mmda.ppt)




In QUAL studies with large amounts of data, it is
difficult for the researcher to ensure that all relevant
issues have been identified
It is also difficult to see underlying patterns that can
be drowned in the sheer quantity of data
It is useful to conduct a preliminary QUANT analysis
to ensure all issues and underlying patterns are
identified
In Case 3, QUAL data is treated qualitatively to find
keywords which then inform a QUAL thematic
analysis

Sumber: Richard Watson Todd (http://arts.kmutt.ac.th/crs/research/mmda.ppt)




In QUAL studies with large amounts of data,
restricting analysis to either QUANT or QUAL
cannot provide a full picture of the data
QUAL provides detailed description of the
data
QUANT provides generalisations of patterns
to the whole data set
In Case 4, QUAL and QUANT analyses are
used together to produce a fuller description
of the data

Sumber: Richard Watson Todd (http://arts.kmutt.ac.th/crs/research/mmda.ppt)
Penggunaan
Pola-pola
Illustration for insight
Summarise for
overview
 Inform analysis
 Provide full picture




QUANT → QUAL
QUAL → QUANT


QUANT → QUAL
Mix of QUANT and QUAL
Sumber: Richard Watson Todd (http://arts.kmutt.ac.th/crs/research/mmda.ppt)
Sumber: Keith Wurtz , Senior Research Analyst, Chaffey College. www.chaffey.edu/research


Sulit mendefiniskannya
Contoh-contoh definisi
 The use of qualitative and quantitative techniques in both
the collection and analysis of data
 Mixed Methods research is given a priority in the research
and the integration of both the quantitative and qualitative
results occurs at some point in the research process
 Research that includes both quantitative and qualitative data
in a single research study, and either the QUAN or QUAL
data provides data that would not otherwise be obtainable
when using only the primary method
Sumber: Keith Wurtz , Senior Research Analyst, Chaffey College. www.chaffey.edu/research
Answers questions that other modalities cannot
Provides a deeper understanding of the examined
behavior or a better idea of the meaning behind what
is occurring
 The inferences made with mixed methods research
can be stronger
 Mixed methods research allows for more divergent
findings
 MM research can include culture in the design by
giving a voice to everyone involved in the behavior
being examined


Sumber: Keith Wurtz , Senior Research Analyst, Chaffey College. www.chaffey.edu/research




Berupaya melibatkan stakeholders dalam
disain dan proses penelitian
Can be very beneficial when many of the
stakeholders are more likely to be critics
Includes less powerful groups and helps to
ensure that they have an equitable impact on
the research
Collaboration has the ability to stimulate
ways of thinking that might not occur when
working individually on a project
Sumber: Keith Wurtz , Senior Research Analyst, Chaffey College. www.chaffey.edu/research
The key to any study is the research question(s)
because this dictates the selection of the research
methods
 In designing a study the underlying purpose is the
reason for doing it, and is a necessary component
 Why are we doing the study?
 The quality of the study and the meaningfulness of
the results are enhanced if we are clear about the
purpose

Sumber: Keith Wurtz , Senior Research Analyst, Chaffey College. www.chaffey.edu/research






Disain Eksplanatori Sekuensial
Disain Exploratory Sekuensial
Disain Transformatif Sekuensial
Disain Triangulasi Konkuren
Concurrent Nested Design
Disain Transformatif Konkuren
Sumber: Keith Wurtz , Senior Research Analyst, Chaffey College. www.chaffey.edu/research




Collection and analysis of QUAN data
followed by the collection and analysis of
QUAL data
Priority is usually given to QUAN data
Integration of QUAN and QUAL data usually
occurs in the interpretation phase of the
study
The purpose is usually to use the QUAL
results to help explain the QUAN results
Sumber: Keith Wurtz , Senior Research Analyst, Chaffey College. www.chaffey.edu/research






Conducted in two phases
Priority is given to the first phase of QUAL data
collection
The second phase involves QUAN data collection
Overall priority is given to QUAL data collection and
analysis
The findings are integrated in the interpretation phase
Most basic purpose is to use QUAN data to help
interpret the results of the QUAL phase
Sumber: Keith Wurtz , Senior Research Analyst, Chaffey College. www.chaffey.edu/research



Mempunyai dua fase pengumpulan data
yangt berbeda
Perspektif teoritis dipakai untuk
mengarahkan studi
Purpose is to use methods that will best
serve the theoretical perspective of the
researcher
Sumber: Keith Wurtz , Senior Research Analyst, Chaffey College. www.chaffey.edu/research
This is probably the most familiar MM design
The QUAL and QUAN data collection are concurrent,
and happen during one data collection phase
 Priority could be given to either QUAL or QUAN
methods, but ideally the priority between the two
methods would be equal
 Two methods are integrated in the interpretation phase
 The integration focuses on how the results from both
methods are similar or different, with the primary
purpose being to support each other


Sumber: Keith Wurtz , Senior Research Analyst, Chaffey College. www.chaffey.edu/research




Gathers both QUAL and QUAN data during the
same phase
Either QUAL or QUAN dominates the design
The analysis phase mixes both the QUAL and
QUAN data
The QUAL data is used to help explain or
better understand the QUAN data
Sumber: Keith Wurtz , Senior Research Analyst, Chaffey College. www.chaffey.edu/research
Guided by a specific theoretical perspective
The QUAN and QUAL data are collected during the
same phase
 The integration of data occurs during the analysis
phase
 The integration of data could occur in the
interpretation phase
 Again, the purpose is to use methods that will best
serve the theoretical perspective of the researcher


Sumber: Keith Wurtz , Senior Research Analyst, Chaffey College. www.chaffey.edu/research

The process of integrating QUAL and QUAN research
needs to be well thought out prior to the study
 QUAL portion needs to be constructed in a way so that more
novel information can be discovered
 Need to decide if QUAL portion is exploratory or confirmatory
If exploratory, the purpose is to identify other
dimensions that the QUAN portion is missing
 If confirmatory, the purpose is to support the QUAN
relationship
 QUAL results can also be used to explain why there
wasn’t a statistically significantly difference

Sumber: Keith Wurtz , Senior Research Analyst, Chaffey College. www.chaffey.edu/research
Selection of research methods need to be made after the
research questions are asked
2. Some methods work well in some domains and not in others
3. There is no model of integration that is better than another
4. When there are results that support each other, it is possible
that both the QUAN and QUAL results are biased and both are
not valid
5. The main function of integration is to provide additional
information where information obtained from one method
only was is insufficient
6. If the results lead to divergent results, then more than one
explanation is possible
1.
Sumber: Keith Wurtz , Senior Research Analyst, Chaffey College. www.chaffey.edu/research

One process of incorporating QUAL data with
QUAN data is known as quantitizing, or
quantifying the open-ended responses
 Dummy Coding (i.e. binarizing) – refers to giving a
code of 1 when a concept is present and a code of 0
if it is not present
Sumber: Keith Wurtz , Senior Research Analyst, Chaffey College. www.chaffey.edu/research
As with any research findings, if they cannot be
communicated to the people who can use the
information than the findings are worthless
 Presenting MM research can be more challenging
because we are trying to communicate two types of
information to readers
 For instance, writing-up QUAN research is very well
defined, and QUAL research is more often about
discovery

Sumber: Keith Wurtz , Senior Research Analyst, Chaffey College. www.chaffey.edu/research




Melibatkan semua stakeholders dalam
merencanakan penelitian
Using MM research design may help a wider
range of audiences connect to the material
Make sure to define the language used in the
report
It is important to decide how the MM research
findings are going to be written: combined or
separately
Sumber: Keith Wurtz , Senior Research Analyst, Chaffey College. www.chaffey.edu/research




The form was not developed by IR
Evaluated paid tutors on five job qualification areas
 Job skills
 Job knowledge
 Work habits
 Communication skills
 Attitude
Three point rubric was used to evaluate paid tutors
1. Did not meet the requirement
2. Met the requirement
3. Exceeded requirements
Evaluators were also asked to provide comments
Sumber: Keith Wurtz , Senior Research Analyst, Chaffey College. www.chaffey.edu/research



How did I combine the qualification ratings
(QUAN) with the evaluator comments
(QUAL)?
Found an example of how to do this from
Sandelowski (2003)
Sandelowski provided an example where the
QUAN responses were categorized and
themes for each category were generated
from the open-ended comments
Sumber: Keith Wurtz , Senior Research Analyst, Chaffey College. www.chaffey.edu/research
First step is to create the categories from the QUAN
data
 This step involves being very familiar with your
data, and also some creativity
 With the paid tutor evaluation it was fairly easy to
develop the categories


Paid tutors who received a perfect rating in every
category (n = 13)
 Paid tutors who had an average ranking equal to or
above the mean (n = 5)
 Paid tutors who had an average below the mean (n = 11)
Sumber: Keith Wurtz , Senior Research Analyst, Chaffey College. www.chaffey.edu/research

Mencampur data QUAL dan QUAN dalam
fase analisis data

After I created the three categories I
printed out the comments associated with
the paid tutors for each category and
identified a theme for each one
Sumber: Keith Wurtz , Senior Research Analyst, Chaffey College. www.chaffey.edu/research
CONTOH-CONTOH
PUBLIKASI
The Journal of Mixed Methods Research (JMMR) is an
innovative, quarterly, interdisciplinary, international
publication that focuses on empirical, methodological,
and theoretical articles about mixed methods
research across the social, behavioral, health, and
human sciences.
The journal's scope includes delineating where mixed
methods research may be used most effectively,
illuminating design and procedure issues, and
determining the logistics of conducting mixed
methods research.
Diunduh dari:
http://mmr.sagepub.com/…… 21/9/2012
Mixed methods research (also called
mixed research) is becoming
increasingly articulated, attached to
research practice, and recognized as
the third major research approach or
research paradigm, along with
qualitative research and quantitative
research.
Diunduh dari:
http://drupal.coe.unt.edu/sites/default/files/24/59/Johnson,%20Burke%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research.pdf…… 21/9/2012
A History of Mixed Methods Research
We would position mixed research between the extremes Plato
(quantitative research) and the Sophists (qualitative research), with mixed
research attempting to respect fully the wisdom of both of these
viewpoints while also seeking a workable middle solution for many
(research) problems of interest.
Today, the primary philosophy of mixed research is that of pragmatism.
Mixed methods research is, generally speaking, an approach to
knowledge (theory and practice) that attempts to consider multiple
viewpoints, perspectives, positions, and standpoints (always including
the standpoints of qualitative and quantitative research).
Diunduh dari:
http://drupal.coe.unt.edu/sites/default/files/24/59/Johnson,%20Burke%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research.pdf…… 21/9/2012
Mixed research, in its recent history in the social and
behavioral or human sciences, started with researchers
and methodologists who believed qualitative and
quantitative viewpoints and methods were useful as they
addressed their research questions.
For the 20th century, “mixed research” (in the sense of
including what we, today, would call qualitative and
quantitative data) can be seen in the work of cultural
anthropologists and, especially, the fieldwork
sociologists.
Diunduh dari:
http://drupal.coe.unt.edu/sites/default/files/24/59/Johnson,%20Burke%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research.pdf…… 21/9/2012
Denzin (1978) defined triangulation as “the combination of
methodologies in the study of the same phenomenon” .
1.
2.
3.
4.
The four types of triangulation:
Data triangulation (i.e., use of a variety of sources in a
study),
Investigator triangulation (i.e., use of several different
researchers),
Theory triangulation (i.e., use of multiple perspectives and
theories to interpret the results of a study), and
Methodological triangulation (i.e., use of multiple methods
to study a research problem).
Diunduh dari:
http://drupal.coe.unt.edu/sites/default/files/24/59/Johnson,%20Burke%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research.pdf…… 21/9/2012
Jick (1979) noted the following advantages of triangulation:
1. It allows researchers to be more confident of their results;
2. It stimulates the development of creative ways of
collecting data;
3. It can lead to thicker, richer data;
4. It can lead to the synthesis or integration of theories;
5. It can uncover contradictions, and
6. By virtue of its comprehensiveness, it may serve as the
litmus test for competing theories.
Diunduh dari:
http://drupal.coe.unt.edu/sites/default/files/24/59/Johnson,%20Burke%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research.pdf…… 21/9/2012
Greene, Caracelli, and Graham (1989) identified the five purposes or
rationales of mixed methodological studies:
1. Triangulation (i.e., seeking convergence and corroboration of
2.
3.
4.
5.
results from different methods studying the same phenomenon),
Complementarity (i.e., seeking elaboration, enhancement,
illustration, clarification of the results from one method with results
from the other method),
Development (i.e., using the results from one method to other
method),
Initiation (i.e., discovering paradoxes and contradictions that lead to
a reframing of the research question), and
Expansion (i.e., seeking to expand the breadth and range of inquiry
by using different methods for different inquiry components).
Diunduh dari:
http://drupal.coe.unt.edu/sites/default/files/24/59/Johnson,%20Burke%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research.pdf…… 21/9/2012
Collins, Onwuegbuzie, and Sutton (2006) identified four
rationales for conducting mixed research:
1. Participant enrichment (e.g., mixing quantitative and qualitative
research to optimize the sample using techniques that include
recruiting participants),
2. Instrument fidelity (e.g., assessing the appropriateness and/or utility
of existing instruments, creating new instruments, monitoring
performance of human instruments),
3. Treatment integrity (i.e., assessing fidelity of intervention),
4. Significance enhancement (e.g., facilitating thickness and richness of
data, augmenting interpretation and usefulness of findings).
Diunduh dari:
http://drupal.coe.unt.edu/sites/default/files/24/59/Johnson,%20Burke%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research.pdf…… 21/9/2012
Definitions of Mixed Methods Research
Huey Chen:
Mixed methods research is a systematic integration of
quantitative and qualitative methods in a single study for
purposes of obtaining a fuller picture and deeper understanding
of a phenomenon.
Mixed methods can be integrated in such a way that qualitative
and quantitative methods retain their original structures and
procedures (pure form mixed methods). Alternatively, these two
methods can be adapted, altered, or synthesized to fit the
research and cost situations of the study (modified form mixed
methods).
Diunduh dari:
http://drupal.coe.unt.edu/sites/default/files/24/59/Johnson,%20Burke%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research.pdf…… 21/9/2012
John Creswell:
Mixed methods research is a research design (or
methodology) in which the researcher collects, analyzes, and
mixes (integrates or connects) both quantitative and
qualitative data in a single study or a multiphase program
of inquiry.
Steve Currall:
Mixed methods research involves the sequential or
simultaneous use of both qualitative and quantitative data
collection and/or data analysis techniques.
Diunduh dari:
http://drupal.coe.unt.edu/sites/default/files/24/59/Johnson,%20Burke%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research.pdf…… 21/9/2012
Isadore Newman:
Mixed methods research is a set of procedures that should be
used when integrating qualitative and quantitative procedures
reflects the research question(s) better than each can
independently.
The combining of quantitative and qualitative methods should
better inform the researcher and the effectiveness of mixed
methods should be evaluated based upon how the approach
enables the investigator to answer the research question(s)
embedded in the purpose(s) (why the study is being conducted or
is needed; the justification) of the study.
(Newman, Ridenour, Newman & DeMarco, 2003.)
Diunduh dari:
http://drupal.coe.unt.edu/sites/default/files/24/59/Johnson,%20Burke%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research.pdf…… 21/9/2012
Mixed methods research is the type of research in which a researcher
or team of researchers combines elements of qualitative and
quantitative research approaches (e.g., use of qualitative and
quantitative viewpoints, data collection, analysis, inference
techniques) for the broad purposes of breadth and depth of
understanding and corroboration.
This definition refers to mixed methods research as a type of research:
A mixed methods study would involve mixing within a single study; a
mixed method program would involve mixing within a program of
research and the mixing might occur across a closely related set of
studies.
Diunduh dari:
http://drupal.coe.unt.edu/sites/default/files/24/59/Johnson,%20Burke%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research.pdf…… 21/9/2012
Graphic of the Three Major Research Paradigms, Including Subtypes
of Mixed Methods Research
Diunduh dari:
http://drupal.coe.unt.edu/sites/default/files/24/59/Johnson,%20Burke%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research.pdf…… 21/9/2012
Current Issues for Mixed Methods Research
What are effective strategies for integration at different stages of the
research process?
Bazeley (2006) has carefully examined how to integrate qualitative and
quantitative data using data analysis software.
Tashakkori and Teddlie (2006) discussed the process of making
metainferences (that are based on the integration of qualitative and
quantitative strands in research studies).
The key idea that mixed methods research requires some form of
integration is clear; still, however, additional research is needed to further
explicate this process.
Diunduh dari:
http://drupal.coe.unt.edu/sites/default/files/24/59/Johnson,%20Burke%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research.pdf…… 21/9/2012
Current Issues for Mixed Methods Research
Does mixed methods need a particular, detailed set of
philosophical and methodological positions?
Variation in particular philosophical commitments should be
welcome in mixed methods research, and we should embrace
these differences as an important part of the mixed methods
research paradigm.
It is important that arguments and discussion about “appropriate”
philosophical commitments continue, so that the field is selfreflexive and continues to grow (philosophically).
Diunduh dari:
http://drupal.coe.unt.edu/sites/default/files/24/59/Johnson,%20Burke%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research.pdf…… 21/9/2012
Current Issues for Mixed Methods Research
Are equal status designs (equal use of quantitative and qualitative
epistemologies) possible?
To address specifically the issue of mixing ideas associated with
research paradigms, we have introduced a concept called
commensurability validity or legitimation, which is “the extent to which
the meta-inferences made [in a mixed methods study] reflect a mixed
worldview based on the cognitive process of Gestalt switching and
integration” .
The strong (or fully) mixed methods position, we argue, is developed
only after explicit and systematic consideration of qualitative and
quantitative perspectives.
Diunduh dari:
http://drupal.coe.unt.edu/sites/default/files/24/59/Johnson,%20Burke%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research.pdf…… 21/9/2012
Current Issues for Mixed Methods Research
Should and how might qualitative dominant, equal status, and
quantitative dominant mixed methods research be more fully
developed and differentiated?
Will the qualitative and quantitative dominant mixed research be
explicitly incorporated into the qualitative and quantitative research
paradigms or will they develop as distinct types?
This should be an exciting area for future research as researchers and
methodologists coming from different epistemological perspectives
construct and systematize these subtypes.
Diunduh dari:
http://drupal.coe.unt.edu/sites/default/files/24/59/Johnson,%20Burke%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research.pdf…… 21/9/2012
Current Issues for Mixed Methods Research
What are the details of a full contingency theory for the conduct of
human research?
That is, exactly
1. When and under what conditions should qualitative research be
considered the appropriate approach,
2. When and under what conditions should quantitative research be
considered the appropriate approach, and
3. When and under what conditions should mixed research be
considered the appropriate approach?
Diunduh dari:
http://drupal.coe.unt.edu/sites/default/files/24/59/Johnson,%20Burke%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research.pdf…… 21/9/2012
Current Issues for Mixed Methods Research
What are the details of a full contingency theory for the conduct of
human research?
A strength of a contingency theory of research is that the strengths
and weaknesses of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed research are
recognized, and all three approaches are considered to be important
and needed, albeit in different circumstances.
A contingency theory also needs to be carefully developed to help the
mixed methods researcher make wise decisions about how to mix
methods and approaches in relation to situational contingencies (e.g.,
given limited resources, what is the best combination to maximize
usefulness of information and evidence?).
Diunduh dari:
http://drupal.coe.unt.edu/sites/default/files/24/59/Johnson,%20Burke%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research.pdf…… 21/9/2012
Current Issues for Mixed Methods Research
A fuller definition of mixed methods research might include reference to
the logic of mixed research.
We believe that additional work is needed to explicate this logic or set of
logics.
When designing a mixed study, according to this “logic,” the research
should strategically combine qualitative and quantitative methods,
approaches, and concepts in a way that produces complementary
strengths and nonoverlapping weaknesses.
Consideration of the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches is
required in relation to situational contingencies.
Diunduh dari:
http://drupal.coe.unt.edu/sites/default/files/24/59/Johnson,%20Burke%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research.pdf…… 21/9/2012
Current Issues for Mixed Methods Research
Tenth, will the field be able to develop a typology of mixed methods
designs that can be broadly agreed upon?
Currently, several typologies are available including, for example,
Creswell and Plano Clark (2007), Morgan (1998), and Teddlie and
Tashakkori (2006).
Do the qualitative dominant, quantitative dominant, and pure mixed
methods research need separate sets of designs? We tentatively suggest
that the answer is yes.
Diunduh dari:
http://drupal.coe.unt.edu/sites/default/files/24/59/Johnson,%20Burke%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research.pdf…… 21/9/2012
Current Issues for Mixed Methods Research
Eleventh, and last, if one were to view mixed methods research,
metaphorically, as the trunk of a tree, then what are its branches?
For example, should the major branches be labeled QUAL+quan,
QUAN+qual, and QUAN+QUAL? What other branches or specialized types
might develop over time (e.g., transformative mixed methods,
collaborative mixed methods, reflective mixed methods)?
We expect many more specific types of mixed methods research and
designs to crystallize in the future as researchers relate mixed methods
research concepts and thinking to new and reoccurring research
problems and situations.
Diunduh dari:
http://drupal.coe.unt.edu/sites/default/files/24/59/Johnson,%20Burke%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research.pdf…… 21/9/2012
A Multimethod Approach to the Study of Sensitive Organizational Issues
Karen A. Jehn and Karsten Jonsen
Journal of Mixed Methods Research October 2010 vol. 4 no. 4 313-341
Sensitive organizational issues such as conflict, lying and deceit, and personal
health issues are difficult to investigate because of their complex, elusive, and
sometimes threatening nature as well as their potential consequences.
In this article, an approach is presented that uses triangulation of multiple
quantitative and qualitative methods to investigate sensitive organizational
issues.
This study of organizational conflict illustrates special data elicitation techniques
(e.g., tree graphs, third-person questioning) designed to decrease the reluctance
of employees to respond to various forms of inquiry.
The qualitative approach complements the survey methods by identifying,
categorizing, and verifying the existence of constructs.
The benefits of the elicitation techniques, computerized text analysis, and
multimethod comparison processes as remedies for research problems
accentuated in studies of sensitive organizational issues are discussed.
Diunduh dari: http://mmr.sagepub.com/content/4/4/313.abstract …… 21/9/2012
Language Learning Motivation in Early Adolescents: Using Mixed Methods
Research to Explore Contradiction
Pamela M. Wesely
Journal of Mixed Methods Research October 2010 vol. 4 no. 4 295-312.
This mixed methods study with an Explanatory Design is an exploration
of students’ language learning motivation as it relates to their attrition
from a language immersion program.
A total of 131 students who had graduated from five public elementary
immersion schools responded to surveys, and 33 of those students were
interviewed.
Data analysis procedures included a theme analysis of the interview data,
a statistical analysis of the survey data, and an integrated consideration
of the qualitative and quantitative findings.
It was found that mixed methods research can be uniquely revealing
about social psychological constructs such as motivation, it can offer
new perspectives where previous studies were contradictory, and it can
accommodate multiple theoretical frameworks.
Diunduh dari: http://mmr.sagepub.com/content/4/4/295.abstract …… 21/9/2012
The Use and Added Value of Mixed Methods in Management Research
José F. Molina-Azorίn
. Journal of Mixed Methods Research January 2011 vol. 5 no. 1 7-24
The prevalence, characteristics, and added value of mixed
methods articles published in two management fields are
examined through a sequential mixed methods design with
four phases.
The results show that mixed methods articles are published
in management journals with different prevalence rates and
characteristics. Moreover, an analysis of the impact and
added value of mixed methods to the field of management is
carried out.
Implications for scholars, academic institutions, and journals
with regard to the application and publication of mixed
methods research are examined.
Diunduh dari:
…… 21/9/2012
Refining a Location Analysis Model Using a Mixed Methods Approach:
Community Readiness as a Key Factor in Siting Rural Palliative Care Services
Valorie A. Crooks, Nadine Schuurman, Jonathan Cinnamon, Heather Castleden, Rory
Johnston.
Journal of Mixed Methods Research January 2011 vol. 5 no. 1 77-95.
Drawing on recent debates pointing to the value of mixed methods
research in human geography, the authors revisit a quantitative location
analysis model previously created to site palliative care services in rural
British Columbia, Canada.
The original quantitative model posited that population (i.e., number of
residents in the community), isolation (i.e., travel time to existing
specialized palliative care), and vulnerability (i.e., number of residents
older than 65 years in the community) are three factors that must be
accounted for when siting palliative care services in rural areas.
Using qualitative interview data, the authors refine this model to include a
newly identified factor: community readiness.
They conclude with a discussion of the benefits of adopting a mixed
methods approach to location analysis model development.
Diunduh dari:
…… 21/9/2012
A Methodology for Conducting Integrative Mixed Methods Research and
Data Analyses
Felipe González Castro, Joshua G. Kellison, Stephen J. Boyd, Albert Kopak
Journal of Mixed Methods Research October 2010 vol. 4 no. 4 342-360
Mixed methods research has gained visibility within the last few years,
although limitations persist regarding the scientific caliber of certain
mixed methods research designs and methods.
The need exists for rigorous mixed methods designs that integrate
various data analytic procedures for a seamless transfer of evidence
across qualitative and quantitative modalities.
Such designs can offer the strength of confirmatory results drawn from
quantitative multivariate analyses, along with “deep structure”
explanatory descriptions as drawn from qualitative analyses.
This article presents evidence generated from over a decade of pilot
research in developing an integrative mixed methods methodology. It
presents a conceptual framework and methodological and data analytic
procedures for conducting mixed methods research studies, and it also
presents illustrative examples from the authors’ ongoing integrative
mixed methods research studies.
Diunduh dari: http://mmr.sagepub.com/content/4/4/342.short?rss=1&amp%3bssource=mfr …… 21/9/2012
Multiple Research Approaches.
IJMRA = International Journal of Multiple Research
Approaches is an international peer-reviewed journal for
timely publication of global research, scholarship,
educational, researcher and practitioner perspectives on
multiple, hybrid (outcome of unusual blending), synergistic
(combined effect), integrated and cultural research
approaches (be these Indigenous, institutional, or community
based) including the Asian, Arctic, Pacific, Latin American
and African regions, as well as European and North
American.
The journal's primary focus is effectively to combine various
theoretical frameworks, methodologies and methods to
address current research questions appropriately.
Diunduh dari: http://mra.e-contentmanagement.com/ …… 21/9/2012
Beyond the ceiling effect: Using a mixed methods approach to measure patient
satisfaction
Sharon Andrew, Yenna Salamonson, Bronwyn Everett, Elizabeth J Halcomb,
Patricia M Davidson. IJMRA 2011 5(1): 052 - 063.
This study reports patient satisfaction with the nursing care on a neurosurgical
critical care unit. A modified version of the Ludwig-Beymer Patient Satisfaction
Questionnaire (PSQ-7) was used, and included structured items and semistructured interview questions. Data were collected from 149 patients.
Participants rated their satisfaction as high (Mean = 25.14; SD = 2.96). The
distribution of scores was skewed and every item demonstrated a ceiling effect.
Principal component analysis yielded a one-component solution which explained
48% of the variance.
NVivo® was used to match PSQ-7 scores with qualitative data. Participants'
comments were categorised as positive, negative or 'yes, but'. Just over half the
patients made positive comments and 29% of patients in the low group made
negative comments. Three categories: 'communication', 'nursing care delivery'
and 'the hospital environment' emerged from the qualitative data.
A mixed method approach enables researchers to move beyond the ceiling effect
of quantitative measures of patient satisfaction and to gain a more meaningful
explanation of patient satisfaction.
Diunduh dari: http://mra.e-contentmanagement.com/archives/vol/5/issue/1/article/3854/beyond-the-ceilingeffect …… 22/9/2012
Integrating qualitative and quantitative research approaches
via the phenomenological method
William Paul Fisher AND A Jackson Stenner
IJMRA 2011 5(1): 089 - 103.
Separated and mixed applications of qualitative and quantitative methods
are typically encumbered by markedly different philosophical
orientations. Multiple inefficiencies arise when mixed methods work at
cross purposes with each other.
The phenomenological method, however, has the potential to integrate
qualitative and quantitative concerns in ways that orient research towards
uniform criteria of substantive meaningfulness and mathematical rigour.
Three characteristics of a qualitative-quantitative methodological
pluralism are described: structural invariance, substantive interpretability
and the display of anomaly.
When combined with networked information technologies, new
opportunities emerge for a qualitatively meaningful and quantitatively
precise measurement framework in the research and practice of the
health sciences.
Diunduh dari: http://mra.e-contentmanagement.com/archives/vol/5/issue/1/article/3856/integratingqualitative-and-quantitative-research …… 23/9/2012
Tracking employees' twists and turns: Describing a mixed methods
approach to assessing change in the psychological contract
Sarah Bankins
IJMRA 2011 5(3): 351 - 366
The psychological contract is a key analytical device utilised by both
academics and practitioners to conceptualise and explore the operation
of the employment relationship. However, despite the recognised
importance of the construct, some authors suggest that its empirical
investigation has fallen into a 'methodological rut' [Conway & Briner,
2005, p. 89] and neglects to assess key tenets of the concept, such as its
temporal and dynamic nature.
This paper outlines the research design of a longitudinal, mixed methods
study which draws upon the strengths of both qualitative and quantitative
modes of inquiry in order to explore the development of, and changes in,
the psychological contract.
Supported by a critical realist philosophy, the paper offers a research
design suitable for exploring the processes of change not only within the
psychological contract, but also similar constructs in the human resource
management and broader organisational behaviour fields.
Diunduh dari: http://mra.e-contentmanagement.com/archives/vol/5/issue/3/article/4462/trackingemployees-twists-and-turns …… 21/9/2012
. Mixed
method research designs: A case study of their
adoption in a doctor of business administration program
Peter John Miller, Roslyn Cameron
IJMRA 2011 5(3) : 387 - 402
The paper presents empirical data concerning the utilisation of mixed
method research in Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) research
projects (theses). The Southern Cross University, Australia, DBA program
was established in 1996 as a research degree and has successfully
graduated over 250 graduates from a diverse range of countries across
the globe. It is the largest DBA program in the Australasia.
The research will present prevalence rates of mixed methods research
utilised by doctoral candidates, data will be presented on the most
frequently used data collection methods and research approaches within
the field of business and management, with empirical data from a number
of countries including Australia, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, and
Indonesia. Emergent issues with regard to the use of mixed methods
research in business and management research and the teaching of
mixed methods are discussed.
Diunduh dari: http://mra.e-contentmanagement.com/archives/vol/5/issue/3/article/4445/mixed-methodresearch-designs …… 23/9/2012
. Combined methods in poverty analysis: Experiences from Namibia
Sebastian Levine, Benjamin Roberts
IJMRA 2008 2(2): 205-211
We explore differences in the findings on poverty in Namibia from a series
participatory poverty assessments and a household survey on household income
and expenditure. We find that the main conclusions from these research
processes appear plausible even if they point to diverging paths of poverty. These
results are attributed to methodological challenges and especially to different
perceptions about the determinants of poverty that each approach conveys.
Using a Q-Squared approach we illustrate that when definitions of poverty based
on the perceptions raised in the qualitative assessments are used on the
quantitative data then the results tend to converge. One particularly interesting
finding is that those identified as poor using the official poverty measure,
established explicitly to capture deprivation in consumption expenditure, have
higher average levels of consumption expenditure than a combined Q-Squared
measure based exclusively on non-monetary criteria.
We generally find that while there might have been a real improvement in
consumption-based measures of poverty over time, given the emphasis on issues
related to assets, access to and quality of delivery of basic services, and issues
related to vulnerabilities (especially food insecurity and the AIDS epidemic) in the
participatory poverty assessments, it is not surprising that the qualitative data
point to deteriorating living conditions.
Diunduh dari: http://mra.e-contentmanagement.com/archives/vol/2/issue/2/article/2368/combined-
QUALITY & QUANTITY:
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODOLOGY.
Quality and Quantity constitutes a point of reference for European and
non-European scholars to discuss instruments of methodology for more
rigorous scientific results in the social sciences.
The journal publishes papers on models of classification, methods for
constructing typologies, models of simulation, neural networks and fuzzy
sets for social research, mathematical models applied to social mobility,
mathematical models of voting behavior, qualitative methodology and
feminist methodology, discussions on the general logic of empirical
research, analysis of the validity and verification of social laws, and
similar topics.
Quality and Quantity is an interdisciplinary journal which systematically
correlates disciplines such as mathematics and statistics with the social
sciences, particularly sociology, economics, and social psychology.
Diunduh dari: http://www.springer.com/social+sciences/journal/11135 …… 23/9/2012
Passenger satisfaction: a multi-group analysis
Laura Antonucci, Corrado Crocetta, Francesco D. d’Ovidio and Ernesto Toma
Quality & Quantity. 2012, DOI: 10.1007/s11135-012-9771-7
..
To analyse the level of passenger satisfaction of a public local transport
service, after an explorative factorial analysis, a Structural Equation
Model was adopted. The main goal of this paper is to verify how much
some service characteristics could influence the perceived quality of the
service.
The passengers are found very sensitive to the level of the service
organization and to the way the service is delivered (punctuality and
regularity, and short waiting time). The safety and reliability of buses, the
level of comfort and cleanness and the professionalism and courtesy of
staff had, also, a big weight to determinate of the customer satisfaction.
Applying a further analysis on different sub-samples, based on individual
characteristics, we found that the model above identified is full invariant
for different residence area and frequency of use of the service, and
partially invariant for age groups, employment status, time slot of use and
reason of use.
The test of invariance the structural coefficients failed considering gender
or education level of the passengers.
Diunduh dari: http://www.springerlink.com/content/102985/?Content+Status=Accepted&MUD=MP ……
. Measuring the quality of work: the case of the Italian social
cooperative
Maurizio Carpita and Silvia Golia
Quality & Quantity. 2012 46(6): 1659-1685
Quality of work has within a short time become a major subject of study and
discussion in labour economy.
Its quantification is a challenging task because it implies the translation of various
subjective perceptions into a single objective measure (composite indicator).
In this paper, the method used to construct measures is the Rating Scale Model
and the available data come from the Survey on Italian Social Cooperatives
carried out in 2007.
The validity of the obtained Rasch measures is tested with respect to some
overall variables of the quality of work.
Moreover, using inferential confidence intervals, these measures are utilized to
evaluate the differences in the perception of the quality of work due to worker
(gender, age and education) and cooperative (type, dimension and geographic
area) characteristics, work characteristics (service area, membership, time and
type of contract) and work incentives (economic, professional and learning).
Diunduh dari: http://www.springerlink.com/content/r7n84400q456/ …… 23/9/2012
Combining research techniques to improve quality service in hospitality
Mar Vila, Xari Rovira, Gerard Costa and Ricard Santoma.
Quality & Quantity. Volume 46. Number 3 / April 2012 . P. 795-812
.
Hospitality research includes many studies that combine and revisit the quantitative–
qualitative debate, and review the arguments for and against using mixed-methods. The aim
of this paper is to demonstrate the application of qualitative methodologies based on the
combination of techniques which also include quantitative elements in addition to those
pertaining to qualitative techniques.
The research aims to specifically identify the most important managerial factors which, from
the point of view of hotel chain executives, serve to improve the quality of the service they
provide.
The techniques used are concept mapping and qualitative optimization, both of which are
qualitative methodologies though they include quantitative elements to overcome the
subjectivity deficits typically found in qualitative methodologies. In addition, the
combination of both techniques leads to greater precision of the results obtained. Our
methodological proposal combines concept mapping with qualitative optimisation, thereby
improving the prioritisation and hierarchical ordering of the ideas obtained and structured.
Instead of working with each cluster’s average score in terms of importance (as defined
within the concept mapping model), our contribution is based on prioritising these based on
their distance to the optimal reference. This allows for experts’ evaluations of each idea in
terms of its importance to not be strictly quantitative, that is, the experts are not obligated to
assign numbers to their evaluations; rather, they can assess ideas based on qualitative
labels.
Diunduh dari: http://www.springerlink.com/content/0033-5177/46/3/ …… 23/9/2012
. A Multimethod Approach to Identifying Norms and Normative Expectations
Within a Corporate Hierarchy: Evidence from the Financial Services Industry
Stephen V. Burks and Erin L. Krupka
Management Science January 2012 vol. 58 no. 1 203-217.
We use an incentive-compatible economic experiment and surveys in the field at a
large financial services firm to identify the norms for on-the-job behavior among
financial advisers and their leaders, and the normative expectations each group
has of the other.
We examine whistle-blowing on a peer, an incentive clash between serving the
client and earning commissions, and a dilemma about fiduciary responsibility to a
client.
We find patterns of agreement among advisers, among leaders, and between the
two groups, that are consistent with company guidelines identified ex ante.
However, we also find measurable differences between what leaders expect and
the actual norms of advisers.
When there is such a mismatch we are able to distinguish miscommunication
from ethical disagreement between leaders and advisers.
Finally, we show that when advisers' personal ethical opinions do not match
group norms, this mismatch is correlated with job dissatisfaction and lying for
money in a second experiment.
Diunduh dari: http://mansci.journal.informs.org/content/58/1/203.abstract …… 23/9/2012
. MIXED METHODS RESEARCH DESIGN.
The nature of mixed methods design of the research
Being a pragmatist, the current research methodology is a mixed
methods research design. Mixed methods design is a type of research
which involves ‘the collection or analysis of both quantitative and
qualitative data in a single study in which the data are collected
concurrently or sequentially (Creswell, 2003; Creswell, 2008).
Diunduh dari:
http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/wie/courses/degrees/docs/who/students/edrhal/research/design/armpaper/ ……
23/9/2012
. MIXED METHODS RESEARCH DESIGN.
The nature of mixed methods design of the research
According to Gray (2009), ‘mixed methods design is used in
circumstances where relatively little or nothing is known about
the research setting or research problems.
In such situations, it would be unfeasible and impractical to
design a questionnaire, since the constructs being measured are
either unknown or not sufficiently understood.
The qualitative study, then, explores, identifies and can provide
clarity about the kinds of variables requiring further
investigation.’
Diunduh dari:
http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/wie/courses/degrees/docs/who/students/edrhal/research/design/armpaper/ ……
23/9/2012
. Mixing Methods in Innovation Research: Studying the Process-Culture-
Link in Innovation Management
Jens O. Meissner & Martin Sprenger
Forum Qualitative Social Research (FQS). Volume 11, No. 3, Art. 13 – September 2010.
Two trends in innovation management have influenced the basic idea of this paper. The first
trend shows increased attempts by managers to utilize linear innovation processes derived
from literature and from practice. The second trend is an increasing acceptance of the
dynamics created in an "innovation culture," as being one of the key drivers of innovation.
Both approaches partially contrast each other.
The missing link between innovation process design and innovation culture at the firm-level
provides the theoretical framework of this paper. Behind the scenes of innovation
management studies, we realized a methodological gap existed between the research of
innovation cultures and their impact upon an organization's innovation processes.
Thus, we applied a methodological mix of problem-centered interviews, structural analyses,
and context analyses to study the phenomenon. We conducted an interview-based single
case study in a Swiss telecommunications company. From these methodologies we created
a themed landscape comprising relational topics of the innovation dynamics within an
innovation project in the company (one year duration) and briefly described each topic.
The main finding in our study is the dynamic role-model that innovation managers in large
service firms have to apply to succeed in their innovation management work. Thus, our
methodological mix proved to be helpful, although some weaknesses remain to be solved in
the future.
Diunduh dari: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1560/3073 …… 23/9/2012
. Mixing Methods in Innovation Research: Studying the Process-Culture-
Link in Innovation Management
Jens O. Meissner & Martin Sprenger
Forum Qualitative Social Research (FQS). Volume 11, No. 3, Art. 13 – September 2010.
Diunduh dari: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1560/3073 …… 23/9/2012
. The other side of sustainable innovation: is there a demand for
innovative services?
Markku Anttonen, Minna Halme, Eeva Houtbeckers, Johanna Nurkka.
. Journal of Cleaner Production. Available online 23 December 2011
As one prominent form of sustainable innovation, eco-efficient services have
been promoted as a promising way towards more sustainable societies. However,
they have not turned into reality as expected. This paper argues that one of the
primary reasons for the slow market penetration of eco-efficient services is the
mismatch between customers’ needs and service providers’ offerings.
In order to start to bridge the knowledge gap, we investigate such customer needs
through the analysis of interview and survey data obtained from over 300
potential customer companies in Finland, most of which operate either in the EU
or globally.
The paper discusses what kinds of eco-efficient services customers need and
under what conditions, and which barriers hinder the use of eco-efficient services
by business customers. The customer companies desire material efficiency
services for managing side streams and non-core processes.
They primarily seek cost and broader business-efficiency improvements from
these services, and find that service providers should be able to construct a clear
business case when marketing services.
Finally, although there are material efficiency services in the market, customer
companies find they are not being marketed actively.
Diunduh dari: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652611005440 …… 23/9/2012
. The other side of sustainable innovation: is there a demand for innovative
services?
Markku Anttonen, Minna Halme, Eeva Houtbeckers, Johanna Nurkka.
. Journal of Cleaner Production. Available online 23 December 2011
Framework for the study: Factors influencing the demand of innovative B2B eco-efficient
services according to previous research.
Diunduh dari: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652611005440 …… 23/9/2012
. The other side of sustainable innovation: is there a demand for innovative
services?
Markku Anttonen, Minna Halme, Eeva Houtbeckers, Johanna Nurkka.
. Journal of Cleaner Production. Available online 23 December 2011
Complemented framework: A comprehensive set of factors influencing the demand of
innovative B2B eco-efficient services.
Diunduh dari: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652611005440…… 23/9/2012
EXPLORING MIXED METHODS RESEARCH (MMR)
Diunduh dari: http://publications.mcgill.ca/medenews/files/2010/12/mixed-methods-researchfigure2.jpg…… 26/9/2012




















Andrew, S. and E. Halcomb (eds). 2009. Mixed Methods Research for Nursing and the Health Sciences Oxford:
Wiley Blackwell.
Creswell, J. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd Edition)
London: Sage.
Plano Clark, V. and J. Creswell (eds). 2008. The Mixed Methods Reader London: Sage.
Teddlie, C. and A. Tashakkori. 2009. Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and
Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioural Sciences London: Sage.
Morgan, D. L. 1998. Practical Strategies for Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Applications for
Health Research Qualitative Health Research 8 362-376.
Morgan, D. (2007). Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained: Methodological Implications of Combining
Qualitative and Qualitative Methods, Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1(1), pp 48-76.
Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Young, B., Jones, D. and A. Sutton. 2004. Integrative Approaches to Qualitative
and Quantitative Evidence NHS: Health Development Agency
Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, Journal of Mixed Methods
Research 1(1), 8-22.
Johnson, R. B. and A. J. Onwuegbuzie. 2004. Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has
Come Educational Researcher 33 (7) 14-26.
Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Guttmann, M. L., & Hanson, E. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research
design. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp.
209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Feilzer, M.Y. (2010). Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of
pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6-16.
Gage, N. (1989). The paradigm wars and their aftermath. Educational Researcher, 18, pp. 4–10.
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method
evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
Howe, K.R. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard. Educational
Researcher, 17(8), 10-16.
Morgan, D. L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to
health research. Qualitative Health Research, 3, 362-376.
Morse, J. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research,
40(2), 120-133.
Shulman, L. (1981). Disciplines of inquiry in education: An overview. Educational Researcher, June/July 1981, 512.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed method research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Blank, E.C., Venkatachalam, P., McNeil, L., & Green, R.D. (2005). Racial discrimination in mortgage lending in
Washington, D.C.: A mixed methods approach. Review of Black Political Economy, 33, 9-30. Retrieved June 10,
2008 from the SocINDEX database.
Creswell, J.W., Clark, V.L.P., Gutmann, M.L., & Hanson, W.E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A.
Tashakkori & C. Teddie’s (Ed.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Greene, J.C., & Caracelli, V.J. (2003). Making paradigmatic sense of mixed methods practice. In A. Tashakkori & C.
Teddie’s (Ed.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 91-110). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Erzberger, C., & Kelle, U. (2003). Making inferences in mixed methods: The rules of integration. In A. Tashakkori & C.
Teddie’s (Ed.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 457-488). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Mertens, D.M. (2003). Mixed methods and the politics of human research: The transformative-emancipatory
perspective. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddie’s (Ed.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research
(pp. 135-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miller.S. (2003). Impact of mixed methods and design on inference quality. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddie’s (Ed.)
Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 423-455). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miller, S.I., & Gatta, J.L. (2006). The use of mixed methods and designs in the human sciences: Problems and
prospects. Quality & Quantity, 40, 595-610. Retrieved June 1, 2008 from the Academic Search Premier database.
Moghaddam, F.M., Walker, B.R., & Harre, R. (2003). Cultural distance, levels of abstraction, and the advantages of
mixed methods. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddie’s (Ed.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral
research (pp. 111-134). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Morse, J.M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddie’s
(Ed.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 189-208). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Newman, I., Ridenour, C.S., Newman, C., & DeMarco, G.M.P. (2003). A typology of research purposes and its
relationship to mixed methods. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddie’s (Ed.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and
behavioral research (pp. 167-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Oermann, M.H., Galvin, E.A., Floyd, J.A., & Roop, J.C. (2006). Presenting research to clinicians: strategies for writing
about research findings. Nurse Researcher, 13, 66-74. Retrieved July 25, 2008 from the Academic Search Premier
database.
Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori
& C. Teddie’s (Ed.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 351-383). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
Posavac, E.J., & Carey, R.G. (2007). Program evaluation: Methods and case studies (7th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
Sandelowski, M. (2003). Tables or tableauz? The challenges of writing and reading mixed methods studies. In A.
Tashakkori & C. Teddie’s (Ed.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 321-350).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Shulha, L.M. & Wilson, R.J. (2003). Collaborative mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddie’s (Ed.)
Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 639-669). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and
behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddie’s (Ed.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral
research (pp. 3-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.