Other Party Management
(OPMT)
9104/1 Special Sub Team
Recommendation
Summary
Tim Lee & Ian Folland
June 23, 2010
Company Confidential
1
Background
9104/1 Ballot Failure
•
The Dec 2009 ballot draft failed in Americas and Asia Pacific
and stopped in Europe
•
9104/1 Sub Team and OPMT conducted extensive debate on
“Show Stopper” issues but failed to reach any consensus.
–
Site definition
–
Audit day calculation for multiple sites
Go Forward – IAQG Council Direction
•
OPMT was directed to charter a focused team to conduct a non
advocate review of the show stopper issues. Team shall be
comprised of technical experts
–
Team launch - May 2010
–
Recommend a solution (June 23, 2010)
2
9104/1 Special Team
Ian Folland & Tim Lee – Facilitators
Team Members:
•
Roger Bennett - International Independent Organization for
Certification (IIOC) – IAF MD 1 Convener and IAF MD 5 Co-convener
•
Reg Blake - Certification Body (CB) representing the Independent
Association of Accredited Registrars (IAAR)
•
Norbert Borzek - German AB - DAkkS – Chair of the IAF Technical
Committee .
•
Patrick Boucheron – Turbomeca, France, OPMT Voting Member
•
Buddy Cressionnie - IAQG 9100 International Document
Representative (IDR)
•
Randy Dougherty – USA AB - ANAB Director – Chair of the IAF
•
Michel Jacquaniello – Zodiac Aerospace, France
•
Kunihiro Tanabe - Japanese AB - JAB
•
Norikazu Tsuchiya – KHI, Japan, OPMT Voting Member
3
Team Recommendations
•
The team developed a detailed document containing
the following concepts:
– Definitions and eligibility criteria for single site,
multiple site, campus, several site and complex
organizations;
– Audit day calculations methodology for all
organizational types;
– Information in the form of a matrix and diagrams
to help understand the different types or
organizations
4
Definitions
•
•
•
•
The team recommended that the ICOP process
utilizes as much of IAF Mandatory Document
language as possible
Definition:
– Site - A site is a permanent location where an
organization carries out work or a service
Rationale:
– Allows for dual certification (ISO and AQMS)
– IAF language has been tested and currently in
use by CB’s
Used to resolve the show stopper issue related
to Site definition
5
Organizational Structure
• Team has developed detailed definitions and eligibility
criteria for the following organizational structures
– Single Site
– Multiple Site
– Campus
– Several Sites
– Complex
• The above takes into consideration the unique
organizational structures that exist in the Aviation,
Space and Defense industry today
6
Example A - Campus
Must have a common quality management system
7
Example B - Several Sites
Must have a
common quality
management
system
8
Audit Day Requirements
• Utilize audit day table contained in 9104-1 December 2009 draft.
• Audit Day Calculations
– Single Site – Number of employees – Reductions for ASRP and
CAAT only
– Multiple Site – Number of employees at each site. Reductions for
ASRP and CAAT only
– Campus – Total number of employees across all sites. No further
reductions. 10% addition for auditing aspects of a campus and
additional communication by audit team
– Several Sites - Number of employees at each site. Maximum of
30% reduction for reduced scope complexity at each site
– Complex – Combination of all the above. Audit time calculation
will require approval by OPMT Sub Team
• Use of Advanced Surveillance Reassessment Procedures (ASRP)
and Computer Aided Auditing Techniques (CAAT) should be
allowed (maximum 30% reduction)
• ASRP shall not in itself be used to justify a reduction
9
Certification Matrix
• Detailed matrix was developed to provide clarification
10
Next Steps
• Deliver special team recommendations to 9104/1 team
(July 1, 2010)
– Request incorporation of special teams
recommendations into updated 9104/1 draft
• 9104/1 Sub team to continue with development
process
– Disposition of all 9104/1 comments
– Ballot updated document
11
Summary
• The Team has delivered a recommendation that was
on time and on target
• Recommendation addresses key 9104/1 ballot failure
issues - “Show Stoppers”
• IAF representatives agreed to take lesson learned
from this effort to drive IAF Mandatory Document
changes (e.g. IAF MD 5 – Audit Day Calculations)
• This should be an acceptable go forward proposal
that provides for sufficient on site audit time needed
for an “Effective” ICOP assessment
12
9104-1 Special Team
13