2003 LEGISLATIVE UDATE Southern Association of Forensic Scientists Savannah Meeting May 5, 2003 Presented by: Smith Alling Lane, P.S. Tacoma, WA (253) 627-1091 Washington, DC (202) 258-2301 London 0 (44) 798 953 8386 Smith Alling Lane A Professional Services Corporation Governmental Affairs Attorneys at Law FORENSIC DNA ISSUES & THE STATE LEGISLATURES Offender DNA Databases Statute of Limitations / John Doe Warrants Post Conviction DNA Testing Related Legislation ISSUE #1 OFFENDER DNA DATABASES U.S. DNA Legislative Time-Line 1983 - California Legislature passes law to collect blood from certain offenders - “DNA” is not mentioned in statute 1988 - Colorado Legislature becomes the first to enact laws requiring DNA from sex offenders 1990 - Virginia Legislature becomes first to enact an all felons DNA law 1991 - Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) establishes guidelines on state sex offender DNA database laws - FBI begins promoting the passage of sex offender DNA database laws - FBI develops CODIS concept 1992 - Majority of states begin passing laws to create DNA databases for sex offenders Time-Line (continued) 1994 - Congress enacts the DNA Identification Act -- CODIS is formally created 1996 - Congress enacts the Anti-Terror and Effective Death Penalty Act - a provision of the legislation encourages (requires) states to enact sex offender DNA database laws - Most states have sex offender DNA database statutes in place 1997 - A majority of states begin focusing on expanding their database laws to include violent crimes and burglary 1999 - 50 states have enacted sex offender DNA database laws - 27 state DNA databases include violent crimes - 14 state DNA databases include burglary - 6 state DNA databases to include all convicted felons Time-Line (continued) 2000 - Congress enacts the DNA Backlog Elimination Act (appropriates $140 million to states for DNA analysis) 2001 - Preliminary data showing the success of the Virginia DNA database is released - A surge in all felons legislation occurs - 7 more states enact laws, for a total of 14 states with all felon laws 2002 - All felons legislation surge continues - 9 more states laws, for a total of 23 states with all felon laws - Continued reliance on both Virginia data and federal funds - Congress discusses additional DNA legislation - Virginia enacts legislation requiring DNA from arrestees The Recent Trend To All Felons 1998 - 5 States 1999 - 6 States 2000 - 7 States 2001 - 14 States 2002 - 23 States 2003 – 26 States Legislation pending in 14 states 2006 - 45 States (est.) -- assuming data and funding State DNA Database Statutes (As of May 1, 2003) STATE Sex Crimes Murder All Violent Crimes Burglary Drug Crimes All Felons Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Some Misdemeanors Jailed Offenders Community Corrections Retroactive Jail & Prison * Juveniles Arrestees/ Suspects Retroactive Probation & Parole Some Misdemeanors STATE Sex Crimes Murder All Violent Crimes Burglary Drug Crimes All Felons Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Juveniles Arrestees/ Suspects Jailed Offenders Community Corrections Retroactive Jail & Prison Retroactive Probation & Parole STATE Sex Crimes Murder All Violent Crimes Burglary Drug Crimes Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming TOTALS 50 49 45 41 31 Some Misdemeanors Retroactive Jail & Prison Retroactive Probation & Parole 26 31 46 46 31 17 All Felons Juveniles Arrestees/ Suspects Jailed Offenders Community Corrections 23 4 2003 Legislative Session: DNA Database Expansion Bills Pending all felons legislation (14) Currently an all-felons state (23) Enacted all felons legislation in 2003 (3) Failed to pass all felons legislation (4) Introduced limited expansion legislation (2) 2003 DNA Database Legislation (As of May 1, 2003) ST Bill # Sponsor AK HB 49 Anderson Expands DNA database to include all convicted felons and juveniles adjudicated delinquent on felony charges (juveniles are not included under current statute). Also includes most misdemeanor sex crimes. Retroactive to include those currently incarcerated. AR HB 1074 Verkamp Expands DNA database to include any felony offense and misdemeanor sex offenses. Includes community sentences, retroactive to include those currently incarcerated. Removes juvenile delinquent adjudications. ENACTED AR HB 2310 Pate Limits qualifying offenses for juvenile adjudications to only serious sexual assaults, murder, kidnapping, and aggravated robbery, and terrorist acts. ENACTED AR SB 416 Gullett Expands DNA database to include crimes of computer child pornography and computer exploitation of a child (1st degree). ENACTED AZ SB 1252 Brotherton CA SB 284 Brulte CO SB 128 CT HB FL HI HI Summary Requires DNA samples upon arrest or after being charged for felony offenses beginning in 2005, and for an arrest or after a charge for any offense beginning in 2006. Status Passed House Died in Committee Expands DNA database to include all convicted felons. Committee Hearing on 5/06 Grossman Local law enforcement may take DNA samples from felony arrestees, but must pay for crime lab analysis. Passed Policy & Fiscal Committee 5022 Berger Expands DNA database to include all convicted felons. Applies retroactively to probationers and parollees. Passed Policy Committee SB 1648 Criminal Justice HB 1065 Mindo HCR 214 Marumoto Requires jails and juvenile facilities to collect DNA from qualifying offenders for the DNA database. Allows blood or other specimen. Expands DNA database to include all convicted felons. Retroactive to include probationers and parolees. Died in Committee Requests an interim study on expanding the DNA database to include all Class A and Class B felons. Died in Committee State Police Expands DNA database to include burglary. Request ID HB 48 IN HB 1531 Goodin LA SB 346 Dardenne ENACTED Expands DNA database to include all convicted felons. Includes felons not sentenced to incarceration, and retroactive to include currently incarcerated. Expands offender DNA database to include all felony convictions and arrestees, as well as prostitution and soliciting prostitution. Also expands the DNA database to include samples from juveniles adjudicated of felonygrade delinquent acts. Died in Committee Died in Committee Passed Senate ST Bill # Sponsor MA SB 187 Jacques MD SB 363 Miller ME HB 300 Faircloth MN SB 239 MO HB MO Summary Expands DNA database to include all convicted felons. Retroactive to include currently incarcerated, probationers, and parolees. Status Committee Hearing on 5/07 Removes temporary provisions of the 2001 DNA database expansion to all convicted felons. Implementation is contingent on receipt of funding in the state budget. Includes post conviction testing provisions. ENACTED Expands the current all-felons DNA database requirement to include juveniles adjudicated delinquent. Died in Committee Kleis Makes permanent last year’s DNA database expansion to include all convicted felons. Budget negotiations 54 Jolly Expands DNA database to include all convicted felons. Includes pleas of guilty and nolo contendre. Retroactive to include probation and parole. Committee Hearing on 4/15 SB 198 Caskey Expands DNA database to include all convicted felons. Includes pleas of guilty and nolo contendre. Retroactive to include probation and parole. Committee Hearing on 4/07 MS SB 2348 Carlton Authorizes the Department of Corrections to collect DNA from “every individual convicted of a felony or in its custody before release from or transfer to a state correctional facility or county jail or other detention facility.” ENACTED NC HB 79 ND HB 1235 Klemin Removes a sunset provision in current statute which would have had the effect of shrinking the state DNA database to only sex offenders. ENACTED NE LB 139 Johnson Clarifies that the state DNA database can be used for forensic casework related to missing persons, relatives of missing persons and unidentified human remains. Designated Priority Bill NE LB 662 Beutler Expands DNA database to include all convicted felons and juvenile felony adjudications. Retroactive to include persons currently incarcerated. Committee hearing on 2/27 NJ HB 2617 Johnson Expands DNA database to include all persons convicted of a “crime”, including those found not guilty by reason of insanity. “Crime” is defined as “an offense for which a sentence of imprisonment in excess of 6 months is authorized.” Includes a $2 fine for all vehicle and traffic violations to pay for DNA testing. Passed Assembly NJ SB 2066 Sacco Expands DNA database to include all persons convicted of a “crime”, including those found not guilty by reason of insanity. “Crime” is defined as “an offense for which a sentence of imprisonment in excess of 6 months is authorized.” Retroactive to include currently incarcerated, parolees and probationers. Passed Policy Committee NV HB 55 Alexander Anderson Expands DNA database to include all convicted felons. Includes persons found not guilty by reason of insanity. Retroactive to persons still in the penal system. Requires the state to supply sheriffs with supplies for collections. Expands offender DNA database to include failure to register with law enforcement as required for a crime against a child or for sex offenses. Passed Policy Committee Passed House and Senate. Needs Concurrence. ST Bill # Sponsor Summary NY HB 2131 NY HB 5271 Ferrara Expands offender DNA database to include attempts at felonies currently required to submit DNA to the state database. Committee NY SB 138 Maltese Requires DNA samples from any person arrested for an offense for which fingerprints are taken. Committee OR SB 729 Minnis Expands offender DNA database to include all Class A misdemeanors Died in Committee PA HB 835 Maitland Expands DNA database to include all convicted felons. Retroactive to include currently incarcerated. Committee RI HB 6104 Dennigan Expands DNA database to include all convicted felons. Committee Hearing 3/26 RI SB 739 Damiani Expands DNA database to include all convicted felons. Committee Hearing 4/30 SC SB 263 Moore Expands DNA database to include all violent felonies (which includes drug trafficking), and any other offense carrying a maximum sentence of 5 years. Retroactive to include currently incarcerated, probationers and parolees. Passed Senate SD SB 184 Abdallah TX HB 562 McCall Requires immediate DNA collection from capital murder (current statute is for all felons but is awaiting funding for implementation) Passed House UT HB 107 Adams Expands DNA database to include immigration violations, and those who commit a felony in another state but are incarcerated or on parole in Utah. (Amendments removed immigration violations.) ENACTED VT HB 133 Kainen Expands DNA database to include all convicted felons, as well as misdemeanor offenses related to sexual abuse by a caregiver and possession of child pornography. Retoractive to include incarcerated, probation and parole. Committee WV HB 2693 Stemple Expands DNA database to include all convicted felons. McLaughlin Requires DNA samples from any person arrested for an offense for which fingerprints are taken. Expands offender DNA database to include all convicted felons, and juvenile adjudications Retroactive to include currently incarcerated and others still under state supervision. Status Committee ENACTED Passed House. Died in Senate. DNA DATABASE SUCCESSES Virginia Database Statistics ~ Over 1100 DNA database hits ~ 85% of hits would have been missed if database limited to only violent offenders. Florida Database Statistics ~ 52% of Florida offenders linked to sexual assaults and homicides by DNA database matches have had prior burglary convictions. New York Database Statistics 1999 New York law expands DNA database to include many nonviolent felonies (including burglary and drug crimes). ~January 2002 Report “The First 100 Hits.” February 2000 – July 2001 104 crime scenes matched with 102 offenders. New York DNA Database Study FIRST 100 HITS: FINDINGS In 33 hits the police reported having "no suspect" at the time the DNA evidence was submitted 75% of the offenders were under some form of criminal justice control (18% on parole, 11% on probation) For 55 of the 102 matched offenders: • The first conviction was not for a DNA index offense • The qualifying offense occurred 4½ years later, during which time these offenders accumulated an average of 10.2 felony and 5.6 misdemeanor arrests. Over all, offenders averaged 11.9 prior arrests and 5.5 prior convictions for felony or misdemeanor offenses Emerging Database Trends Misdemeanor Convictions Some states require DNA from specific misdemeanors Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, Kansas, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Oregon, Washington • Misdemeanor pleas if originally charged with a qualifying felony offense • Repeat violent offenders; Multiple misdemeanor convictions • Lewd and lascivious conduct; Indecent exposure; Public indecency • 3rd degree sexual abuse; Elder abuse • Menacing; Harassment; Stalking • Animal Cruelty • Prostitution • Peeping • False imprisonment • 4th degree burglary Emerging Database Trends Misdemeanor Convictions Connecticut HB 5353 – All misdemeanor convictions Not passed Louisiana (multiple) – prostitution and soliciting a prostitute Pending Oregon SB 729 – Class A misdemeanors. Not passed Vermont HB 133 – caregiver sex abuse, poss. of child porn Not passed Emerging Database Trends Felony Arrests Louisiana, Texas, and Virginia are authorized to collect from certain felony arrests at various stages of pre-conviction. California authorizes samples collected from certain felony suspects to be maintained on the database for two years. Emerging Database Trends Felony Arrests Arizona SB 1252 -- Felony arrests Failed Colorado HB 128 -- Felony arrests Pending Louisiana (multiple) -- Felony arrests Pending Nevada HB 55 – Volunteered and court ordered suspect samples into CODIS Failed New York (multiple) – fingerprintable arrests Pending Emerging Database Trends Felony Arrests THEMES Limited to certain felony offenders Expungement requirements ISSUES Local collection burden Funding Cannot be uploaded to national index ISSUE #2 STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS & DNA STATUTE of LIMITATIONS & FORENSIC DNA Legislation Considered by States 1. Elimination 2. Elimination / Extension if a DNA profile from the crime scene is available 3. Extension for a set number of years 4. Codification of “John Doe” warrants or indictments STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS LEGISLATION (since 2000) 2003 STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS LEGISLATION STATUTE of LIMITATIONS & FORENSIC DNA Backlogs mean some investigators must wait months, even years for analysis of low-priority cases. New York - 16,000 unanalyzed rape kits. DNA is solving crimes considered “cold” for over 20 years. Continuing push to give DNA databases a chance to work. Milwaukee “solved case” protocol California v. Stogner ISSUE #3 POST CONVICTION DNA TESTING POST CONVICTION LEGISLATION (since 2000) 2003 POST CONVICTION LEGISLATION POST CONVICTION DNA TESTING Legislation Considered by States 1. Limited period for motions 2. Death Row / Lifer v. All felons 3. Innocence maintained / Identity an issue 4. Testing costs 5. Penalties ISSUE #4 RELATED LEGISLATION OTHER BILLS Samples in the database by mistake do not invalidate an arrest or conviction Mandated accreditation, forensic science review commissions – New Jersey, Texas, Missouri, others Missing persons programs – New Mexico, New York Victims DNA Bill of Rights – California, Massachusetts, Federal California HB 155 – “Good cause” for continuance includes the temporary unavailability of requested DNA analysis results Illinois HB 3354 -- Defendants may make a motion for a court order before trial for DNA analysis and database comparison Louisiana SB 1956 – Requires DNA samples from new law enforcement officers Texas HB 661 – Extends the allowable time for execution of a search warrant for DNA from 3 days to 20 days. STATE FUNDING EFFORTS Earmarks Targeted spending for specific problems • California state DNA grant program • North Carolina rape kit focus (2003) • Louisiana serial killer investigation (2003) But, earmarks are one-time deals – not a reliable source Other Sources Needed For example • Arizona 3% assessment on all civil penalties and traffic fines Similar efforts in Indiana and New York •Ohio Victims of Crime/Reparation Fund •Offender Pays (Ranges from $25 to $250) •Local jurisdiction pays for testing United Kingdom method Florida & California budget proposal Current practice at many local and regional labs •Delayed implementation Scheduled roll-out (Arizona and Florida) Upon sufficient funding FORENSIC DNA ISSUES & THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DNA Initiative DNA Casework and Offender Backlogs Authorization and Appropriation National Studies President Bush’s DNA INITIATIVE Announced March 2003 To be overseen by US Department of Justice (NIJ) ONE BILLION DOLLARS DNA INITIATIVE Funding Measures $1 over five years $232.6 million requested for FY 2004 Eliminating Backlogs Casework Backlogs Offender Backlogs Federal Offenders Crime Lab Capacity Public Lab Capacity FBI Forensics CODIS Research & Development Improving DNA FBI R&D Demonstration projects Nat’l For. Sci. Commiss. $92.6 million $76.0 $15.0 $1.9 $90.4 million $60.0 $20.5 $9.9 $24.8 million $10.0 $ 9.8 $ 4.5 $ 0.5 DNA INITIATIVE Funding Measures Criminal Justice Training Law Enforcement Prosecutors, Defense, Judges Corrections, Probation, Parole Forensic Scientists Medical Services Victim Services $17.5 million $3.5 $2.5 $1.0 $3.0 $5.0 $2.5 Post Conviction Issues $5.0 million Missing Persons $2.0 million DNA INITIATIVE Policy Measures Expand state databases to include all felons Expand federal database to include all felons Apply expanded database statutes retroactively, to include those “under supervision” Allow inclusion of other DNA samples “collected under applicable legal authority” TURNING AN INITIATIVE INTO LAW White House / DOJ DNA Initiative Proposal Congress Congress Authorize spending programs Appropriates funding 2003 FEDERAL DNA LEGISLATION BILLS INTRODUCED IN THE SENATE: S. 149 - Rape Kits and DNA Evidence Backlog Elimination Act Senator Mike DeWine (R-OH) S. 152 - Sexual Assault Justice Act Senator Joseph Biden (D-DE) S. 22 - Justice Enhancement and Domestic Security Act Senator Tom Daschle (D-SD) Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) Judiciary Committee Chair BILLS INTRODUCED IN THE HOUSE: H.R. 537 - DNA Database Completion Act of 2003 Representative Robert Andrews (D-NJ) H.R. 89 - Stop the Violent Predators Against Children DNA Act Representative Shelia Jackson Lee (D-TX) Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) Judiciary Committee Chair S. 149 Rape Kits and DNA Backlog Elimination Act (Proposed prior to DNA Initiative) 1. Convicted Offender Reauthorization $ 25 million in 2004 $ 25 million in 2005 $25 million in 2006 $25 million in 2007 2. Unsolved Casework Reauthorization $75 million in 2004 $75 million in 2005 $25 million in 2006 $25 million 2007 3. Local Agencies May Apply Directly for Unsolved Casework Grants 4. Authority to upload any legally collected sample into the national database (arrestees/juveniles) 5. All felons for Military and Federal Crimes FY 2003 FEDERAL DNA GRANTS No Suspect Casework Awards begin in late June, to roll out as requests receive final approval $55 million in requested awards $35 million in appropriated funding Only the first year of the 2-year grant request will be funded in 2003 ? 2004 grant solicitation not expected until next year Offender Profile Outsourcing A federal program (not a grant) to pay for outsourcing offender analysis NIJ will procure DNA analysis services from pre-approved private labs A seamless mechanism for sending out convicted offender samples Operational by the beginning of May ? “Non-supplanting funds" rules will apply to this program DNA FUNDING ISSUES Heavy reliance on federal funding which may not always be available Backlogs are typically the result of funding levels that have not kept up with demand for DNA testing States with the best DNA programs have traditionally had strong support in state funding Local responsibility in funding casework is likely to increase FORENSIC DNA ASSESSMENT PROJECT NIJ has asked Smith Alling Lane and Washington State University to develop the following data: What is the “Hit Rate”? What is the true backlog for homicides and rapes? How much crime could be prevented with larger databases? What do DNA programs need? What are the savings to law enforcement when DNA is used? Comparative analysis to the United Kingdom Assessment completion date - Summer 2003 OTHER PROJECTS • International Association of Chiefs of Police – DNA Summit in April 2003 – Summit document out this fall • Other Studies – NIJ Victims Office, Santa Monica Rape Treatment Center – Best practices Questions ? www.dnaresource.com lhurst@smithallinglane.com