One new technology, discover a new world NanoDLSay™ for Protein-Protein Interaction Study, Label-free Protein Complex and Protein Oligomer/Aggregate Detection and Analysis in Real Biological Samples Copyright Nano Discovery Inc. 2012 www.nanodiscoveryinc.com Tel: 407-770-8954 Email: huo@nanodiscoveryinc.com A fundamental problem with the current bioassay In real biological systems, a biomolecule exists not only as individual molecules, but also as complexes, and this issue is severely neglected by the current assay techniques Individual proteins I. Protein complexes Protein aggregates II. Traditional immunoassay assumes proteins only exist as monomer! III. • • We will not know if any complex is here or not The complex leads to a fake lower concentration The labeled signaling antibody cannot recognize the complexed target protein Conclusion in this case: target protein is not present in the sample at all!!! What is NanoDLSay™: Detect target proteins by monitoring the size change of nanoparticles upon binding with the target protein Immunoglobulin G (IgG) (~ 7-10 nm) Protein monomer (~ 5-20 nm) Protein complex (>> 5-20 nm) D ~ 120 nm D ~ 130-160 nm D >> 130-160 nm D = 100 nm Gold nanoparticles (AuNP) Dynamic light scattering (DLS): Measure particle size in nanometer size range Scattered light intensity fluctuation Scattering light Laser beam Intensity Distr. (%) Correlation function Large particle Small particle 100 120 200 Average particle size (nm) Protein-AuNP interactions: Au-S, Au-N bonding, electrostatic and van der Waals interaction Protein “Protein Corona” References Au0 Au+ Au+ Au0 Au0 Au+ Au+ 1. Dobrovolskaia MA, Patri AK, Zheng J, Clogston JD, Ayub N, Aggarwal P, Neun BW. Interaction of colloidal gold nanoparticles with human blood: effects on particle size and analysis of plasma protein binding profiles. Nanomedicine (Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine) 2009, 5, 106-117. 2. Lacerda SHDP, Park JJ, Meuse C, Pristinski D, Becker ML, Karim A, Douglas JF. Interaction of gold nanoparticles with common human blood proteins. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 365-379. Protein 3. Calzolai L, Franchini F, Gilliland D, Rossi F, Protein—nanoparticle interaction: identification of the ubiquitin-gold nanoparticle interaction site. Nano Lett. 2010; 10: 3101-3105. Why not to measure the size of the biomolecules directly using DLS? The scattering light intensity of biomolecules is too weak Such analysis can be done, but at very high concentration – not reflecting the true state of a protein in biological samples Such analysis can only be done on pure protein samples Why Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs)? • • • • • Exceptionally intense light scattering property 105 times stronger than a fluorescent dye molecule; 100s-1000s times stronger than polystyrene (PS) latex particles Detection limit of DLS for AuNPs can easily reach fM to aM range As an optical probe, AuNPs easily stands out from sample matrix B A C PS particle Serum AuNPs Gold nanorods AuNPs Dark field optical images of AuNPs mixed with human serum (A) and PS particles (B) and gold nanorod AuNR (C) NanoDLSay™: Detect target proteins in all forms At a saturated binding, the average particle size increase of the assay, , is approximately twice of the diameter (D) of the protein A protein complex is typically larger than a monomer A protein complex causes larger average particle size increase of the assay than a protein monomer When a protein exists as an oligomer aggregate, it may crosslink the nanoparticles into clusters, leading to a substantial particle size increase of the assay Applicable for detecting other biomolecule complexes such as DNA-protein complexes Average particle size increase (nm) 3 2 1 = 2D of analyte 0 min Incubation time (min) 30 min Information on the target molecule is obtained from real biological samples Applications Real-time kinetic binding study of proteinprotein interaction Label-free protein complex detection and analysis in real biological samples Label-free protein oligomer and aggregate detection and analysis in real samples Comparison of NanoDLSay™ with other existing techniques I. Kinetic study of protein-protein interaction Assay format I: immobilize one target protein on AuNP as a probe Procedure: 1. Immobilize one target A or B protein to the AuNP 2. Mix the target A or B-modified AuNP with target B or A protein 3. Monitor the AuNP size change 4. Binding affinity may be estimated using Langmuir adsorption model Target A Average particle size (nm) Target B Requirements: Immobilization of A or B on AuNP does not affect protein-protein interactions Non-binding proteins 0 Incubation time (min) 30 Sample suitability: Pure protein samples Homogeneous solution assay, obtain results in minutes Detect both strong and weak binding Monitoring binding in real-time I. Kinetic study of protein-protein interaction Assay format II: allow proteins bind first in solution, then conduct adsorption assay + A + B C complex Comparison to obtain binding information Procedure: 1. Mix relevant protein binding partners together 2. Conduct adsorption assay of individual target with AuNP 3. Conduct adsorption assay of mixed product with AuNP 4. Comparison of assay results from 2 and 3 to obtain complex information Requirements: At least one protein will readily adsorb to AuNP Sample suitability: Pure protein samples Compared to assay format I: The AuNP-adsorption assay does not affect target protein binding Suitable for studying multi-binding partner (more than 2) complexes I. Kinetic study of protein-protein interaction Assay format III: two AuNP probe interaction assay Target B Target A + Procedure: 1. Make a target A or B-conjugated AuNP probe 2. Mix the two probes in solution 3. Monitor the size change of the assay 4. A-B interaction leads to AuNP cluster formation Limitations: Immobilization of A or B on AuNP does not affect protein-protein interactions Sample suitability: Pure protein samples Compared to assay format I and II: Increase assay sensitivity for detecting weak interactions Not limited to the size of the proteins or other target molecules Jans H, Liu X, Austin L, Maes G, Huo Q. Dynamic light scattering as a powerful tool for gold nanoparticle bioconjugation and biomolecular binding study. Anal. Chem. 2009; 81: 9425-9432. Kinetic binding study between protein Aconjugated AuNP with human IgG (target) Binding activity of protein A-conjugated AuNP with human IgG is lost after crosslinking modification with glutaraldehyde (GA) Austin L, Liu X, Huo Q. An immunoassay for monoclonal antibody isotyping and quality analysis using gold nanoparticles and dynamic light scattering. American Biotechnology Laboratory 2010; 28: 8, 10-12. mouse anti- f-PSA-B mouse anti-f-PSA-A 120.0 Particle Size (nm) Particle Size (nm) 145.0 anti-IgG1 135.0 anti-IgG2a anti-IgG2b 125.0 anti-IgM 115.0 105.0 115.0 anti-IgG1 anti-IgG2a 110.0 anti-IgG2b anti-IgM 105.0 0 5 10 15 Incubation Time (min) 20 25 0 5 10 15 20 Incubation Time (min) 25 30 Assay: conjugate anti-isotype antibody to AuNP, and then conduct assay on the antibody product Product 1: Mouse anti-f-PSA antibody A, isotype IgG1, pure monoclonal antibody Product 2: Mouse anti-f-PSA antibody B, mixture of IgG1, IgG2a and IgG2b Both products were claimed to be mouse monoclonal antibodies Among six monoclonal antibodies from a vendor X, three have quality problem Surface plasmon resonance works on this application, but expensive Assay kit from vendor Y costs $20 per analysis, NanoDLSay costs 20-30¢ per assay Average particle size increase (nm) II. Label-free protein complex detection and binding partner analysis from real samples Step 2: Binding partner screening using antibody Step 1: Catch the target Binding partners Particle size change upon antibody addition c ~ 2D Not binding partners Incubation time (min) Step 1. Determine if a target protein exists as a complex (The final net increase of the AuNP size tells how big the target protein is) Step 2. Screen and identify the binding partners to the target protein Jaganathan, S.; Yue, P.; Paladino, D.C.; Bogdanovic, J.; Huo, Q.; Turkson, J. A functional nuclear epidermal growth factor receptor, Src and Stat3 heteromeric complex in pancreatic cancer cells. PLoS One, 2011, 6(5):e19605 (Open Access). Step 1: Catch the target Experiments: 1. Prepare the AuNP immunoprobe for EGFR 2. Use the EGFR-AuNP probe to catch the target 3. Determine if EGFR is in a complex 4. Control: add anti-EGFR to the sample solution, incubate, and then repeat the binding assay with AuNP immunoprobe. AuNP immunoprobe for target protein, EGFR 160 ~ 70 nm 120 140 Particle size (nm) 140 Particle size (nm) EGFR is about 10-15 160 nm, 70 nm of increase suggests it is a complex! EGFR-AuNP probe Mouse IgG1-AuNP probe 100 80 60 120 Control study 100 Untreated sample 80 Inhibited for 7 min Inhibited for 24 min 60 40 0 10 20 30 Incubation time (min) 40 40 0 5 10 Incubation time (min) 15 Screening the binding partners in the complex using specific antibody Step 2: Binding partner screening using antibody Experiments: 1. Add an antibody for the suspected binding partner into the assay solution 2. If the particle size is increased, then it is a positive response, and vice versa 3. Control: add a negative isotype control antibody to the assay solution 40 39 34 Particle size increase (nm) Particle size increase (nm) 35 30 29 If we conduct a sandwich assay, the conclusion 24 will be: EGFR is not there! 25 20 15 10 5 0 IgG anti-STAT3 anti-SRC anti-EGFR 19 Negative control 14 9 4 -1 IgG anti-STAT3 anti-SRC anti-EGFR III. Label-free protein oligomer/aggregate detection and analysis protein monomer o Specific detection of target protein oligomer/aggregates in real samples Average particle size increase (nm) o Protein oligomer/aggregates cause AuNP probe cluster formation oligomers, aggregates = 2D of analyte 0 min Incubation time (min) 30 min Bogdanovic J, Colon J, Baker C, Huo Q. A label-free nanoparticle aggregation assay for protein complex/aggregate detection and analysis. Anal. Biochem. 2010; 45:96-102. 75 300 GAPDH in PB Buffer Average particle size (nm) Average particle size (nm) GAPDH in TEA Buffer 250 200 150 Day I Day II 100 Aggregation begins here 50 0 65 60 55 50 45 0 20 40 60 80 100 GAPDH concentration (µg/mL) 120 80 0 20 40 60 80 100 GAPDH concentration (µg/mL) 120 GAPDH: Glyceraldehyde 3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase GAPDH in RIPA Buffer Average particle size (nm) 70 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 0 20 40 60 80 100 GAPDH concentration (µg/mL) 120 Experiments and results: 1. Conjugate an anti-GAPDH antibody to AuNP 2. Study the binding of anti-GAPDH-AuNP probe with GAPDH at different concentrations 3. Plot an assay average particle size-GAPDH concentration curve 4. Substantial aggregation of GAPDH occurs at 25 µg/mL in TEA buffer 5. Less aggregation in phosphate buffer Detection of human IgG dimer and discovery of a new molecular test for prostate cancer diagnosis using IgG-AuNP adsorption assay Huo, Q.; Litherland, S.A.; Sullivan, S.; Hallquist, H.; Decker, D.A.; Rivera-Ramirez, I. Developing a nanoparticle test for prostate cancer scoring. J. Translational Medicine, 2012, 10:44 (open access). IgG Figure 2 5 10 100 huIgG concentration (µg/mL) 1000 tissue type 3 1 ra de 0 G 60 Tumor-IgG interaction reflected in the IgG-AuNP adsorption assay 2 68.5 nm ra de 80 85.5 nm G 100 1 120 ra de 140 NanoDLSay reveals human IgG dimerization at > 100 µg/mL G 160 'Normal' threshold set as 2SD from mean be ni gn 180 corona size Average particle size (nm) 200 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 al IgG dimer Average D ~ 300 nm no rm Citrate-AuNP D ~ 100 nm Comparison of NanoDLSay™ with other existing techniques NanoDLSay™ versus Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) NanoDLSay™ SPR o Label-free technique o Label-free technique o Optical substrate: gold nanoparticle o Optical substrate: gold thin film o Read-out: AuNP size change o Read-out: refractive index change o Homogeneous solution assay o Heterogeneous chip assay o Low cost of consumables o High cost of consumables o Reveal the size information of the target analyte, distinguish protein complexes and oligomers/complexes from monomers o Does not reveal the size information of the target analyte, does not tell whether a protein is a monomer, complex or oligomer Comparison of NanoDLSay™ with co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) followed by immunoblotting for protein complex analysis NanoDLSay™ versus size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and analytical ultra-centrifugation (AU) for protein complex and oligomer/aggregate detection and analysis SEC and AU: o For pure protein solution study only o SEC underestimates complex or oligomer/aggregate formation (eluent dilution disrupts existing complexes/oligomers) o AU overestimates complex or oligomer/aggregate formation (centrifugation artificially increases protein complexes/oligomers) NanoDLSay™: o Detect protein complexes, oligomers/aggregates from real samples o Fast screening test for protein complex/oligomer/aggregates Non-specific interactions: effect on Co-IP and NanoDLSay™ A problem in Co-IP: o Significant non-specific interactions caused by the separation process o The concentration of the particle probes and proteins is artificially increased during centrifugation, increasing non-specific interactions This problem does not exist in NanoDLSay™: o The AuNP probe concentration is relatively low, reducing non-specific interactions o No centrifugation separation is involved Product & Services NDS1200: A new dynamic light scattering instrument designed for performing NanoDLSay™ Automatic measurement of 12 samples Automatic kinetic study of 12 samples Fast analysis time: 10-20s per sample 40 µL assay solution is used for the measurement Low-cost, disposable min-glass tubes with caps are used as sample containers. No cross-contamination between samples High throughput analysis capability: 120180 samples/hour The hardware is maintenance-free No special housing environment is required for the instrument Extremely easy-to-use software Product & Services NanoDLSay™ software: A software designed for flexible, kinetic and high throughput analysis Order Information Product and Order Information NDS1200 NDS-Kit1000 Dynamic light scattering instrument for conducting NanoDLSay™ Assay kit including disposable sample cells and other consumables Please Contact Us to Request a Quote: 3251 Progress Drive Suite A1 Orlando, FL 32826 Phone: 407-770-8954 Email: sales@nanodiscoveryinc.com Or visit online: www. nanodiscoveryinc.com Notes o Patent application pending on NanoDLSay™ technology and NDS1200 system: PCT/US09/030087 and PCT/US11/21002 o Nano Discovery Inc. has the exclusive license in the world to practice and commercialize NanoDLSay™ technology