FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE USAGE IN ADVERTISING Pennarola, chapter VI, Leech 181-185 Rhetoric in advertising Rhetorical figures artful deviation from the norm. It occurs when an expression deviates from expectation. The two elements or domains are linked and the nature of such link determines the type of rhetorical figure. By linking the two elements (or domains), the characteristics of one are transferred to the other. Advantages of rhetoric in advertising Attracts attention; geting noticed Complex rhetoric: involves comprehension, cognitive processing and interpretation Provides pleasure, self-contentment: pleasant feelings Provides longer retention (McQuarrie & Mick 2003) Visual and verbal rhetorical tropes may sometimes create meaning incongruity => consumers use more cognitive effort to interpret the advertisement. If the effort is rewarded with relevant meanings, consumers will appreciate the advertisement more. Advantages of rhetoric in advertising Advantages of rhetoric in advertising Advantages of rhetoric in advertising Ad as persuasive language Persuasive language uses rhetorical tropes or figures to reach its purposes of persuading people to buy or use the advertised product/object/service “A rhetorical figure occurs when an expression deviates from expectation, the expression is not rejected as nonsensical or faulty, the deviation occurs at the level of form rather than content, and the deviation conforms to a template that is invariant across a variety of content and contexts.” (McQuarrie / Mick 1996) TROPES There are four kinds of tropes mainly used in adverts: Metaphor (&simile) Metonymy (& synecdoche) Synaesthesia Irony (& nonsense) METAPHOR (1) Two seemingly unrelated subjects are put in relationship (for ex., YOU ARE A ROSE). -- when something is something else: the ladder of success (i.e, success is a ladder). "Carthage was a beehive of buzzing workers." Or, "This is your brain on drugs." The first object is described as being a second object. In this way, the first object can be economically described because implicit and explicit attributes from the second object can be used to fill in the description of the first. METAPHOR (2) A metaphor consists of THREE parts: the tenor, that is the subject to which attributes are ascribed; the vehicle, that is the subject from which the attributes are derived; the ground, that is the part(s) of semantic field from which the attributes are selected to create the relationship between the tenor and the vehicle (Halliday 1985) METAPHOR (3) Example : All the world's a stage, And all the men and women merely players They have their exits and their entrances; William Shakespeare, As you like it 2/7 THE WORLD (TENOR) THE STAGE (VEHICLE) THE GROUND (SEMANTIC FIELD/ATTRIBUTES) METAPHOR (7) VISUAL METAPHOR VERBAL METAPHOR (Cook 1992: 108-109) http://c.uglym.com/cms/show_article/333003.html SIMILE A simile is a figure of speech in which the subject is compared to another subject. Similes are marked by use of the words like or as (for example, “He was as nervous as a long-tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs”). SIMILE (2) - EXAMPLE Visual simile: Life can be so simple (like having a cup of coffee and a cigarette) SIMILE (2) - EXAMPLE Visual simile: Comparing two things or ideas, usually by saying “like” or “as.” In this case, Fiber-Castell is suggesting that the colors of its pencils are as natural as the color of a purple eggplant. METONYMY Metonymy is an association created between meanings which are contiguous rather than similar. A rhetorical strategy of describing something indirectly by referring to things around it. -- using a vaguely suggestive, physical object to embody a more general idea: CROWN for royalty; the PEN is mightier than the SWORD. We use metonymy in everyday speech when we refer to the entire movie-making industry as a mere suburb of L.A., "Hollywood”. Metonymy (2) In metonymy, associations are contiguous because we indicate: 1. 2. 3. 4. effect for cause ('Don't get hot under the collar!' for 'Don't get angry!'); object for user ('the stage' for the theatre and 'the press' for journalists); substance for form ('plastic' for 'credit card', 'lead' for 'bullet'); place for: 5. event: ('Chernobyl changed attitudes to nuclear power'); person ('No. 10' for the British prime minister); institution ('Whitehall isn't saying anything'); institution for people ('The government is not backing down'). METONYMY - Example An ad for pensions in a women's magazine asked the reader to arrange four images in order of importance: each image was metonymic, standing for related activities (such as shopping bags for material goods). Metonymy Metonymy Metonymy Metonymy This Mercedes-Benz ad is of both a frontal and side view of a man’s face merged. The text reads “Look to the side without looking to the side”, which fits the merging of the faces. The image is a metaphor for the text, and a metonymy for the technology that is being advertised. Metonymy Neckties shaped like sushi is a great advertising example. Tokyo is in Japan, where sushi is well known. The relationship between image and text is solid. The image and text compliment each other completely. Metaphor and metonymy play a role in this advertisement because of the connection between the image and text. The ties shaped like sushi are a metaphor for Tokyo , sushi is a metonymy for Tokyo. SYNECDOCHE Synecdoche is like metonymy but more ‘specific’. Part to Represent Whole For example: The word “bread” can be used to represent food in general or money (e.g. he is the breadwinner; music is my bread and butter). The word “sails” is often used to refer to a whole ship. The phrase "hired hands" can be used to refer to workmen. The word "wheels" refers to a vehicle. SYNECDOCHE Using the whole to refer to a part is also a common practice in speech today. For example: At the Olympics, you will hear that the United States won a gold medal in an event. That actually means a team from the United States, not the country as a whole. If “the world” is not treating you well, that would not be the entire world but just a part of it that you've encountered. SYNECDOCHE (2) Synecdoche is used when (Lanham 1969: 97): A part of something is used for the whole (“hands” to refer to workers); The whole is used for a part (“the police” for a handful of officers); The species is used for the genus (“bread” for food, “kleenex” for facial tissue) SYNECDOCHE (3) Visual Synecdoche: Referring to a whole by its part or a part by its whole. In this case, Heinz uses the pieces of a tomato to imply what the tomato, with all its other components, will be come: ketchup. The slogan instead introduces a simile SYNECDOCHE (3) In photographic and filmic media a close-up is a simple synecdoche - a part representing the whole. Indeed, the formal frame of any visual image functions as a synecdoche in that it suggests that what is being offered is a 'slice-of-life', and that the world outside the frame is carrying on in the same manner as the world depicted within it. Synecdoche invites or expects the viewer to 'fill in the gaps' and advertisements frequently employ this trope. Any attempt to represent reality can be seen as involving synecdoche, since it can only involve selection (and yet such selections serve to guide us in envisaging larger frameworks). SYNECDOCHE (3) The Nissan ad shown here was part of a campaign targetting a new model of car primarily at women drivers (the Micra). The ad is synecdochic in several ways: • it is a close-up and we can mentally expand the frame; • it is a 'cover-up' and the magazine's readers can use their imaginations; • it is also a frozen moment and we can infer the preceding events. IRONY In IRONY, the signifier of the ironic sign seems to signify one thing but it actually signifies something very different. Where it means the opposite of what it says (as it usually does) it is based on binary opposition. IRONY Irony reflects the opposite of: the 'I the thoughts or feelings of the speaker or writer love it' = I hate it truth about external reality 'There's a crowd here' = it's deserted IRONY Substitution can be based on dissimilarity understatement)or disjunction (as in exaggeration) dissimilarity disjunction (as in IRONY (2) This ad from the same Nissan campaign illustrated earlier makes effective use of irony. We notice two people: in soft focus we see a man absorbed in eating his food at a table; in sharp focus close-up we see a woman facing him, hiding behind her back an open can. As we read the label we realize that she has fed him dog-food (because he didn't ask before borrowing her car). SYNAESTHESIA It is a peculiar form of metaphor In linguistics, it is the production from a senseimpression of one kind of an associated mental image of a sense-impression of another kind SYNAESTHESIA (2) Synaethesia is amply used by copywriters because it represents the hedonistic invitation to enjoy all the senses Lips that scream with colour (Rimmel) For colour at its softest (l’Oreal) Synaesthesia Other tropes Hyperbole (= exaggeration; sometimes = irony) An interior fit for an emperor (Peugeot) To the moon and back four times a day (United Airlines) Discover colours so pure it blushes with you. Introducing Blushing Micronised Cheek Colour (Estée Lauder) Other tropes Antonomasia Any single entity appearing in the advert text becomes the representative of its category The Make-Up of Make-Up Artists (Max Factor) Nespresso. What else? (Nescafè) Carte Noir. French for Coffee Audemars Piguet. The master watchmaker Other tropes Tautology Self referential quality of advertising discourse It can be merely visual: the whole advert text consists of the photo of the product simply accompanied by the brand name as if the product did not require any introduction It’s a Volvo. It’s a Volvo (we printed it twice in case you didn’t believe the first time) (Volvo) NEW, NEW, NEW, NEW, NEW, NEW, NEW, NEW, NEW, NEW, NEW, AND NEW New Bodyform Invisible – with 12 improvements Other tropes Anaphora It is the repetition of one or more words within a sentence. It creates an effect of expectation, emphasis and symmetry it’s where moths dance. it’s where laughter comes easily. it’s where time meander. it’s where i’m always religthing the candles. it’s where our friends come to Sunday lunch. it’s where other don’t leave until Monday morning. It’s where we live. it’s our habitat (Habitat) Grice’s Cooperative Principle (1976) The Co-operative Principle "Make your contribution such as is required, at the stage at which it occurs, by the accepted purpose or direction of the exchange in which you are engaged" (Grice 1976). (1). A: What time is it? B: It’s five o’clock (2). A: It’s my birthday today. B: Many happy returns. How old are you? A: I’m five. Grice’s Cooperative Principle (1976) Conversational Maxims: Quantity Don’t say more than necessary Make your contribution as informative as required Quality Do not say what you believe to be false Do not say that for which you lack adequate evidence Relevance the contribution must be relevant, appropriate to the need. (So, in a question, the relevant contribute will be the answer) Manner be clear avoid ambiguity Conversational principles One speaker may: Violate the maxims. Flout one or more maxims Conversational principles One speaker may: Violate the maxims. the speaker says something which is not true, and knows that the hearer will not understand that the utterance is not true. The speaker deliberately tries to mislead the hearer. A: and you are… mmm… a doctor? B: It is true that the addresser of the present utterance is, at the time of speech, the legitimate holder of an advanced degree in medicine and of a valid licence to practice medicine in the jurisdiction in which this sentence is being spoken. Conversational principles One speaker may: Flout one or more maxims an additional unstated meaning of an utterance has to be assumed in order to understand an utterance this creates the implicature A: I am out of petrol B: There is a garage around the corner A: Well, how do I look? B: Your shoes are nice. Grice’s Cooperative Principle (1976) It might seem that advertising would be a poor example of “co-operation”, as that word is usually understood: the advertiser is trying to tell you something you don’t want to know at a time when you aren’t interested to make you do something that you wouldn’t otherwise do. Yet the interpretation of ads depends on “cooperation” as Grice defines it. Grice’s Cooperative Principle (1976) Quantity Don’t say more than necessary Grice’s Cooperative Principle (1976) Quantity Make your contribution as informative as required Grice’s Cooperative Principle (1976) Quality Do not say what you belied to be false http://www.lavazza.com/corporate/en/avantgarde/creativelab/products/espesso.html Grice’s Cooperative Principle (1976) Quality Do not say that for which you lack adequate evidence http://www.adsneeze.com/health/ads-aquafresh-whitening-toothpaste Grice’s Cooperative Principle (1976) Relevance the contribution must be relevant, appropriate to the need. So, in a question, the relevant contribute will be the answer http://www.adsneeze.com/health/ads-aquafresh-whitening-toothpaste Grice’s Cooperative Principle (1976) Manner Be Clear http://www.creativereview.co.uk/cr-blog/2010/january/diesel-says-be-stupid Grice’s Cooperative Principle (1976) Manner Avoid ambiguity http://www.brainstorming.ba/?p=99 http://streetstylista-guy.blogspot.com/2010/09/think-less-stupid-more.html http://melodysnook.wordpress.com/2009/05/ Grice’s Cooperative Principle (1975) advertising = no “co-operation” YET the interpretation of ads depends operation”. on “co- We always assume that, however obscure the ad, it is directed at us, and it can be understood in terms of: the purpose of the advertiser the direction of the communicative exchange Grice’s Cooperative Principle (1975) Copywriters flout at least one maxim. Why? Because advertisers have to compete for attention. They have to counter our resistance to direct selling. Grice’s Cooperative Principle (1975) In Britain, at least, violations are typically indirect. (1)They leave the actual sales pitch to us, as something we (cleverly) find by noticing the flouted maxim and arriving at the right implicatures. (2)We test our interpretation back against what we take to be their purpose: we reject interpretations that don’t tell us something favourable about the brand. Perusasion & Rhetorical tropes When persuasion is the overriding goal, as in advert language, the manner in which a statement is (visually or verbally) expressed is more important than its content With rhetorical figures, copywriters look for the most effective form of expression in swaying the audience Rhetorical tropes Rhetorical tropes are DEVIATION from the expected norm When we speak, communication sets up expectations which function as conventions or constraints (Grice’s maxims) Rhetorical tropes Listeners/viewers are aware of them: indeed words and images are used to convey one of the main meanings given in dictionaries Rhetorical tropes flout these conventions Rhetorical tropes Listeners/viewers exactly know what to do when a speaker flouts a convention: they create an implicature This means that listeners/viewers search for a context that will render the flouting intelligible If context permits an inference, then the consumer will achieve an understanding of the advertiser’s (visual or verbal) statement Rhetorical tropes Consumers therefore have conventions available to deals with floutings of convention When a search for context successfully restores understanding, the consumer assumes a figurative use and responds accordingly Because there is a deviation, consumers are invited to translate the text with one additional meaning Rhetorical tropes Consumers are under no compulsion to start reading a headline or watching a pict, or finish reading it or continue on to read the rest of the ad. Therefore, an important function of rhetorical figures is to motivate the potential consumer. References Barthes, Roland. 1977. Image-Music-Text. London: Fontana. Callow, Michael A. / Schiffman, Leon. 2002. Implicit Meaning in Visual Print Advertisements: A Cross-Cultural Examination of the Contextual Communication Effect. International Journal of Advertising, 21: 259-277. Cook, Guy. 1992. The Discourse of Advertising. London: Routledge. Edens, Kellah M. / McCormick, Chistine B. 2000. How Do Adolescents Process Advertisements? The Influence of Ad Characteristics, Processing Objective, and Gender. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 450-463. Grice 1976 Goddard, Angela.1998. The Language of Advertising. London: Routledge. Halliday. M.A.K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold, London. Kövecses, Zoltan. 2005. Metaphor in Culture. Universality and Variation. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. Lakoff, George / Johnson, Michalel. 1980. Metaphor we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lanham, Richard A. 1969. A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms. Berkeley: University of California Press . Leech, Geoffrey. 1966. English in Advertising, London: Longman. McQuarrie, Edward / Mick, David G. 2003. Visual and Verbal Rhetorical Figures under Directed Processing versus Incidental Exposure to Advertising. Journal of Consumer Research: 579-587. McQuarrie, Edward / Mick, David G. 1996. Figures of Rhetoric in Advertising Language. Available at http://lsb.scu.edu/~emcquarrie/rhetjcr.htm. Retrieved on Nov. 18, 2010. Myers, Greg. 1994. Words in Ads. London: Arnold. Myers, Greg. 1998. Ad Worlds. London: Arnold. McQuarrie, Edward F / Mick, David G. 1992. On Resonance: A Critical Pluralistic Inquiry into Advertising Rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research 19: 180-97. Pennarola, Cristina. 2009. Nonsense. Deviascion in advertising. Napoli: Liguori