Fraud Examination, 4E Chapter 10: Inquiry Methods and Fraud Reports Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. Learning Objectives Understand the interviewing process. Plan and conduct an interview. Understand the nature of admission-seeking interviews. Describe the different deceptions and lies used by perpetrators. Describe the different types of honesty testing. Prepare a fraud report. Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license The Interviewing Process An interview is : the most common technique used to investigate and resolve fraud a question-and-answer session designed to elicit information a structured (not free-form) conversation that has a purpose the systematic questioning of individuals who have knowledge of events, people, and evidence of a case Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license The Interviewing Process Interviews also help obtain: information that establishes the essential elements of the crime leads for developing cases and gathering other evidence the cooperation of victims and witnesses information on the personal backgrounds and motives of witnesses Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license The Interviewing Process Three types of interviewees: Friendly Interviewees Go beyond normal expectation to help out Neutral Interviewees Have nothing to gain or lose from the interview Have no hidden motives or agendas Hostile Interviewees Are often associated in some way with the suspect or the crime Should be questioned without prior notice Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license The Interviewing Process Characteristics of a Good Interview Sufficient length and depth Focus on pertinent information Should end on a positive note Should be conducted soon after the event Should be objective Endeavor to gather information in a fair and impartial manner Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license The Interviewing Process Characteristics of a Good Interviewer Outgoing personalities Interact well with others Help others feel at ease Do not interrupt respondents unnecessarily Display interest in the subject and in what is being said Phrase questions in a non-accusatory manner Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license The Interviewing Process Characteristics of a Good Interviewer Demonstrate a lack of bias Be on time Attired professionally Deal fairly with respondents Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license Understanding Reaction to Crisis Sequence of Reaction Stage 1. Denial Acts as a “shock absorber” In the denial stage, people… appear temporarily stunned or dazed refuse to accept the information given insist that there is some mistake, or fail to comprehend what has been said. Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license Understanding Reaction to Crisis Stage 2. Anger A dangerous time to resolve frauds Suspects direct their anger at friends, relatives, coworkers and/or self Others can insult, harm, slander, or libel suspects and may terminate them without due cause Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license Understanding Reaction to Crisis Stage 3. Bargaining & Rationalization People attempt to justify the dishonest act and/or to minimize the crime Leads to failure to prosecute, easy penalties, and weak testimonies Interviews can be detrimental to attempts to uncover the truth Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license Understanding Reaction to Crisis Stage 4. Depression Many withdraw or lose interest People no longer deny or rationalize the dishonest act Anger is replaced by a sense of loss and disappointment People often become withdrawn and uncooperative Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license Understanding Reaction to Crisis Stage 5. Acceptance Acknowledgement of what happened A desire to resolve the issue and move on Interviews are most useful and witnesses most cooperative Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license Understanding Reaction to Crisis Individuals go through the five stages differently Individuals can cycle through the emotions of denial, anger, rationalization, and depression a number of times Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license Planning an Interview Follow a plan or outline to meet your objectives Review relevant documents to gather as much information as possible Conduct interviews at the interviewee’s office (except for hostile interviewees) Set up an appointment Plan sufficient (even excess) time for the interview Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license Conducting an Interview Interviewer’s Demeanor Be efficient, courteous, polite, and careful with language used during interviews Do not talk down to the person Language of Interviews Use short questions, confined to one topic, which can be clearly and easily understood. Maintain full control of the interview Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license Conducting an Interview Question Typology Interviewers ask five types of questions: Introductory Informational Assessment Closing Admission-seeking Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license Conducting an Interview Elements of Conversation Basic Elements of effective conversation: Expression Persuasion Therapy Ritual Information Exchange Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license Conducting an Interview Inhibitors of Communication Competing Demands for Time Threatened Egos Etiquette Trauma Forgetting Chronological Confusion Inferential Confusion Unconscious Behavior Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license Conducting an Interview Facilitators of Communication Fulfilling Expectations Recognition Altruistic Appeals Sympathetic Understanding New Experience Catharis Need for Meaning Extrinsic Rewards Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license Mechanics of the Interview Methodology Make Physical Contact Establish the Purpose of the Interview Don’t Interview More than One Person at a Time Conduct the Interview in Private Ask Nonsensitive Questions Get a Commitment for Assistance Establish a Transitional Statement\ Seek Continuous Agreement Do Not Invade Body Space Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license Mechanics of the Interview Question Sequence Questioning should proceed from the general to the specific; that is, seek general information before details are sought Note Taking Procedure is especially helpful should documents from a particular interview be subpoenaed. Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license Mechanics of the Interview Observing Respondent Reactions Must be knowledgeable about respondents’ behavior during interviews. Theme Development Be sure to formulate your questions in a way that does not elicit strong emotional reactions. Transition Methodology Once the introduction has been completed, transition to the body of the interview. Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license Mechanics of the Interview Volatile Interviews Typically involve close friends and relatives of suspects, co-conspirators, and similar individuals. Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license Physiology of Deception Detecting Deception There are no quick and easy techniques for detecting deception; instead, careful practice and learning to look for patterns and comparison lead to expertise in this skill. Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license Physiology of Deception Verbal and Nonverbal Cues Extensive academic research suggests that verbal cues are more reliable predictors of deception than nonverbal cues. Cues to deception suggests that liars’ attempts to appear honest will lead them to exhibit behaviors in five areas: Increased tension, less positive and pleasant interactions, less forthcoming responses, less compelling tales, and fewer ordinary imperfections Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license Honesty Testing The most common inquiry method is the interview. Three other methods exist: Pencil-and-Paper Test Graphology Voice stress analysis and polygraphs. Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license The Fraud Report Includes: Findings Conclusions Recommendations Corrective actions taken Should be: Objective Factual Unbiased Free from distortion Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license