MBA in Perspective Fundamentals in General Management Prof. dr. Pieter Klaas Jagersma BSN - Buren - May 20 2008 1 Points to cover • • • • • • • • Speaker and approach History of general management Basics of general management Scanning the environment Policy formulation Policy implementation Policy evaluation and control Last but not least 2 0 Speaker and Approach 3 Speaker Science ‘Heart’share Author Entrepreneur Non-executive Private life 4 About today’s lecture ... • • • • • • • Put MBA in perspective - holistic approach Cliffhangers (frameworks/visualizations) From Paper > Practice ‘On the cutting edge’ - tailor made for BSN Present some generalized lessons learned ‘The key to success is not trying to please everyone’/Cosby ‘95 (monologue/dialogue) Have fun! 5 Today’s core message Transparancy is the magic word! 6 1 History of General Management (GM) 7 Contents • • • • General management: what’s in a name? General management and faculty Journals and professional societies Development of general management theory and research 8 a General Management: What’s in a Name? 9 Quite clear ..... General Management is about the direction of organizations ‘Heart’ of wealth creation in modern society! 10 General Management = General management is an approach in which leading managers (‘general’ managers) decide what to do with regard to which value chain activities in a holistic manner and oriented towards specific organization-wide goals [MBA] 11 Surprise ... Practice >> very old but ..... Theory >> ‘child of sixties’ 12 Background • First Industrial Revolution (1750-1850): no ‘strategic’ behavior >> businesses small, little capital employed, room for everyone,‘invisible hand of the market’ • Second Industrial Revolution (1850-1920): construction of key railroads >> mass market building possible >> ec. of scale/scope >> rivalry ‘visible hand of general managers’: large vertical integrated firms + management hierarchies to deal with (environmental) complexity 13 Background (Cont.) • Alfred Sloan (CEO GM: 1923-1946): articulated need for ‘general’ management thinking: business policy = f (strengths + weaknesses of Ford) developed multidivisional ‘control’ structure • WW II vs ‘general’ management: how to allocate scarce resources across an organization? (quantitative analysis/’OR’-’besliskunde’) through formal planning organizations can exert control over market forces and future 14 b General Management and Faculty 15 Roots of General Management as an academic discipline • • • • • First ‘Business Policy’ (GM) course at Harvard University (1912) GM/Business Policy course: built out of functional courses like accounting, operations, finance (‘integration’) Case method (Harvard style) Model for other Business Schools First course or final course 16 General Management faculty • • • Professors (experienced teachers with broad view of business) + assistent/associate professors (former ‘senior’ - general - managers) Eclecticism + holistic perspective: how to match a firm’s choices with its (competitive) environment (famous ‘fit’ question) General Management/Business Policy as a ‘capstone course’ 17 Consequence of ‘capstone course’ • • • • • • Single ‘capstone course’ permits no development! Faculty makes intellectual homes elsewhere Course development work: cases (not articles and books) ‘Rich’ general descriptions of practice (thanks to case writing and consulting) In 1963 influential ‘general management’ conference at Harvard Business School (HBS) Since early 1970s accumulation of cases and research (externally) 18 c Professional Societies and Journals 19 Professional societies • • • • The Planning Forum (USA)/Business Policy Society (UK) (since 1950s/1960s) Strategic Management Society (since 80s) >> Sponsored AMJ, AMR, AME, SMJ Vereniging voor Strategische Beleidsvorming (VSB) (since 1980s) NCD (since 1970s) 20 General Management Journals - categories Specific Business Journals LRP, The Planning Review (70s); JoM (60s); SMJ (80s) and JBS (also since 80s) General Management Journals HBR, SMR, CMR, JofB, Business Horizons, JoGM, HMR, M@n@gement (www.managementsite.net) Academic Journals ASQ, AMJ, AMR, Management Science, MAB, M&O, ESB 21 d Development of General Management Theory and Research 22 Birth of the General Management Field: One fundamental work/book “Business Policy: Text and Cases” (Harvard Textbook Andrews / Learned et al, 1965) 23 Business Policy: Text and Cases (1965) • • Organization-concept of Chandler + ‘Distinctive Competence’ (Selznick, ‘57) + ‘uncertain environment’ (which means instant adaptation of organizations) Environment (thanks to changes): ‘opportunities and threats’ and firm’s ‘strengths + weaknesses’ were adapted to avoid threats and take advantage of opportunities [SWOT] 24 Business Policy: Text and Cases (1965) (Cont.) • • • Internal appraisal of strengths and weaknesses >> ‘distinctive competencies’ and external appraisal of threats and opportunities > ‘potential success factors’ (CSFs/KSFs) Internal + external appraisal = foundations of ‘business policy formulation’ ‘Business policy formulation’ is ‘analytical’ and ‘business policy implementation’ is ‘administrative’ (denken versus doen) 25 Their audience ... Professors and students 26 Who influenced General Management practice? 1 General Electric (GE): in 1960s ‘godfather’ of business planning and executive education programs with help from ‘academic friends’ and private consulting firms (McKinsey&Company) 27 Who influenced General Management practice? (Cont.) 2 The Boston Consulting Group - BCG (Henderson - mid-1960s) Why? - Applying quantitative research to business problems - Selling powerful oversimplifications - What are basic rules for success? - The most relevant frame of reference is the ‘concept’ 28 How? Concepts a. Experience curve Experience in production > market share > lower costs > higher margins and cash flow > highest profits > dynamic aspect called for ‘competitive behavior’ (needing: ‘integrated’ management = ‘general management’) 29 How? (Cont.) b. Growth-share matrix Cash cows/dogs/stars/question marks (‘era of portfolio analyses’) 30 ‘Growth-share matrix’ Marketshare Industry growth high high low low Star ? Cash cow Dog 31 Industry attractiveness - Competitive position matrix Industry attractiveness (lots of criteria) Business strength high medium low high Invest/ growth Selective growth Selectivity medium Selective growth Selectivity Divest/ harvest Selectivity Divest/ harvest Divest/ harvest low 32 How? (Cont.) Spin-offs: Bain&Company etc etc ‘Thanks to’ BCG, the entrepreneurial responsibility of management was recognized to consider the long-run, dynamic direction of the firm, even while maintaining routine and efficient operations (mindset of decision makers: from efficiency to effectiveness) 33 General Management research in the 1960s/1970s • • Experiental, case-based evidence in 1960s: descriptive studies Systematic observation, deductive analysis and modeling (1970s): normative studies 34 General Management research in the 1980s: dichotomy Descriptive studies of how policies are formed/implemented (‘management process’) G. Steiner (long-range planning), H. Mintzberg (‘emergent decision making’), J.B. Quinn (‘logical incrementalism’) Studies seeking to understand the relationship between organization choices and performance (‘management content’ school) HBS (growth and diversification), Purdue (heterogeneity and performance within a single industry), Harvard University (IO/market power and entry/exit barriers) et cetera et cetera 35 General Management research in the 1990s/2000s General Management inspired by ‘globalization’: - third dimension of management (P/F) product functions geography 36 2 Basics of General Management (GM) 37 Organization performance (‘firms’) attractive- positioning potential ness of of firm internal industry synergy 55% 20% 10% potential external synergy 15% maximum profitability 100% Source: Caves (1977); Porter (1980); Goldman Sachs (1996); Jagersma (2000) 38 Definition of ‘general management’ General management = 1. environmental scanning + 2. (business) policy formulation + 3. (business) policy implementation + 4. (business) policy evaluation/control 39 General Management is ... • Future thinking/‘Controlling’ the future Design of a desired future • (Integrated) Decision making Fundamental choices; Integration of hierarchically determined actions • ‘Formalized procedure to produce an articulated result, in the form of an integrated system of decisions/actions’ (Mintzberg, 1990) Emphasis on formalization: decomposition, distinction, and rationalization of processes/decisions/actions ‘Business plans’ 40 Why business plans? • • • • • They provide a discipline forcing managers to take a careful look ahead periodically (mngt of ‘future’) They require rigorous communications about mission, vision, strategies, objectives, goals, and resource allocations: clarity Basis for evaluating + integrating short-term (functional) plans They help implement changes once decided on They make the management group coherent 41 Bad General Management - numbers oriented ‘Playing tennis by watching the scoreboard instead of the ball’ - The Economist (1988) 42 General Management (process): 6 basics GM is a process - basic ingredients design great general management Congruence/‘fit’ between ingredients is decisive Responsible for ‘pie’ is the ‘general’ manager, CEO and/or Managing Board (RvB/Directie) The result of the GM process - a couple of steps is explicit and prioritized Simplicity always wins! Formulation + implementation ‘join hands’ 43 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 44 Basic requirements for successful General Management Focus Fit Fitness Flexibility ..... on customer needs ..... between will and skill ..... of front- ..... of total and back- organization office 4Fs 45 3 Scanning the environment 46 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 47 External environment: what’s in a name? • • • Opportunities and threats (OTs) outside the organization Organizational context: determines success or failure of organization Variables (often) not within short-run control of general management 48 External environment: two parts Societal environment: forces that influence the long-term decisions of an organization Business (industry) environment: forces or groups that directly affect an organization (stakeholders, 5-forces of Porter, unions, et cetera) Scenario Building 49 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 50 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 51 Societal trends 1. Sustainability (‘CSR/’Sustainability’) 2. Information society 3. Globalization 52 BV Nederland verstrikt in ‘Economische Zone des Doods’ (EZ2D) 53 Headlines of international newspapers “The Globalization of Markets .....” “A Global Trade War on the Way?” “Protectionist Pressures are Building .....” “Ads that celebrate the Global Product .....” “Multinationals Tackle Global Marketing .....” “Globalization: The Debate Goes on .....” “P&G’s Gamble on ‘Globalization’ .....” “Going Global in Europe .....” ..... Source: Financial Times/WSJ(E) 54 Global industry - What’s in a name? - ‘an industry in which a company’s competitive position within that industry in one country is interdependent with that in another country’ (Porter, 1986) - ‘an industry in which a competitive advantage is derived from the exploitation of scale, scope and skills economies or comparative advantage across country boundaries within a centrally coordinated business system’ (Jagersma, 2002) 55 Industries can be characterized on a spectrum Sources of sustainable competitive advantage Source: Jagersma (2002) Local Derived from country market >>> Emerging >>> Global Derived from worldwide management of business system (integration) - ‘3S economies’ - Country comparative advantage (factor costs) - Centralization of strategy and (de)centralization of stages of business system as efficiency and effectiveness dictate 56 ‘Doomloop’ for (most) companies local industries emerging industries global industries MARGIN - many players - innovation - effectiveness - customer - organic growth - high margin TIME - (very) few players - lack of innovation/imitation - efficiency - firm and competitors - anorganic growth 57 - low margin Industries can be characterized on a spectrum Industries on the MOVE Source: Jagersma (2004 data 1980 vs 2002) Local 47% (89%) >>> Emerging 33% (8%) >>> Global 20% (3%) [1] Trade-off: local versus global industries [2] Turbulence plus unpredictability > alliances/M&A [3] New skills required (entrepreneurial skills?) 58 [1] % companies/industries in ‘EZ2D’ [added value in terms of share of GNP] Countries Local USA Germany UK France Spain Belgium Netherlands Italy Japan South-Korea 34% 40% 39% 45% 49% 41% 47% 53% 39% 34% Emerging 29% 30% 22% 29% 27% 26% 33% 35% 29% 21% Global 37% 30% 39% 26% 24% 33% 20% 12% 32% 45% Source: a.o. OECD, UN, EC/EU (2000-2003) 59 [2] % industries on new/mature spectrum 2 3 5 3 1 Countries New Growth Mature USA Germany UK France Spain Belgium Netherlands Italy Japan South-Korea 34% 14% 29% 15% 23% 20% 15% 13% 25% 28% 26% 32% 30% 26% 32% 28% 30% 23% 35% 33% 40% 54% 41% 59% 45% 52% 55% 64% 40% 39% Source: a.o. OECD, UN, EU/EC (2000-2003) 60 In our ‘global village’, competing globally is imperative for countries Countries Global ‘competitors’ IMD; WEF; PKJ USA Germany UK France Spain Belgium Netherlands Italy Japan South-Korea 3 7 4 7 4 6 9 10 2 1 Global ‘casualties’ IMD; WEF; PKJ ? 61 Implication: CHANGE necessary! Countries Industries Companies Units/departments Managers/employees Skills 62 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 63 Tool no. 1 - Mapping an industry landscape: SCP model Structure Conduct Performance Main drivers/’shocks’ - Technology breakthroughs - Changes in government policy/regulations (domestic/ international) - Changes in life styles/tastes 64 Tool no. 2 - Mapping an industry landscape: ‘5 forces model’ of Porter (1980) Bargaining Power of Suppliers Bargaining Power of Customers concentration/fragmentation of suppliers forward integration improvement in supplier information surge or decline in supply new means for coordinating with suppliers concentration/fragmentation of buyers backward-integration improvement in buyer information surge/decline in demand shifts in customer tastes new means for coordinating with customers Threat of Substitutes emergence of new substitute change in barriers of entry increase in buyer comfort with a substitute Rivalry among Existing Competitors shift in industry growth change in mix between fixed and variable costs emergence of dominant design or product consolidation fragmentation/new entry ..... Threat of New Entry decline in EOS + customer heterogeinity > market fragmentation into niches emergence of switching costs 65 Tool no. 3 - Mapping an industry landscape: ‘value net’ of Brandenburger and Nalebuff (1996) Customers Competitors Company Complementors Suppliers 66 Four phases in the evolution of environmental scanning Primitive No impetus “Face it” No effort No purpose Ad hoc “Watch out” Reactive Deal with environment to proNo active search tect the future Random effort Sensitive to cer- Appropriate tain issues responses Scan to enhance Less specific inunderstanding fo collection Proactive Predict environment Structured effort Deliberate effort Looking for compe67 titive advantage Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 68 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 69 Internal environment: what’s in a name? • • • • Strengths and Weaknesses (SWs) inside the organization Organizational content: determines success or failure of organization Variables within short-run control of general management First of all: structure, culture, and resources 70 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 71 Vertical and horizontal synergy MB vertical synergy BU 1 Headquarters/ Head Office/ Corporate Center CS BU 2 BU 3 horizontal synergy 72 Vertical synergy MB vertical synergy BU 1 Headquarters/ Head Office/ Corporate Center CS BU 2 BU 3 73 Generic roles of CC/HQ Steer Bind MBCs ? Support 74 Ways for CC/HQ to add value • • • • Coordinate Integrate Allocate Initiate 75 How to add value as CC/HQ no. 1 - Coordinate X Transfer/share of skills, experience and knowledge K Y B ECONOMIES OF SKILLS/KNOWLEDGE 76 How to add value as CC/HQ no. 2 - Integrate X Y X/Y Cost Volume Volume Volume ECONOMIES OF SCALE 77 How to add value as CC/HQ no. 3 - Allocate CC X Resources - People (MD) - Funds (enhance ROI) Y ECONOMIES OF SCOPE 78 How to add value as CC/HQ no. 4 - Initiate Stand-alone BU performance improvement ‘Sounding board’ for making decisions (‘objective view’) Agreeing/monitoring performance (‘stretched targets’) Selecting/replacing BU managers Approving major capital expenditures Mobilizing special expertise (M&A skills) Corporate development To help implement growth strategies (‘spotting’) To help implement desinvestment strategies 79 Horizontal synergy EB Headquarters/ Head Office/ Corporate Center CS BU 1 BU 2 BU 3 horizontal synergy 80 Why is horizontal synergy difficult to realize? • • • • Leading (‘general’) managers use 1950s-’70s insights (Ansoff/portfolio models - BCG etc) Information flows vertically, not horizontally Within units focus on customers/market - not on collegues in other units/departments Bonus/incentive structure focused on own + unit performance, not based on collaboration across organization 81 ‘Portfolio management’ approach versus ‘Synergy management’ approach high synergy management Synergy ‘CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING’ portfolio management low limited high Diversification 82 Circumstances determining horizontal synergy Is horizontal synergy a strategic priority? What is the weight of horizontal synergy as a strategic priority? Do we have enough time to act? urgency HRM/IT/IS-systems; culture; quality BU-management etc strategic importance horizontal synergy basic conditions lower cost position and/or differentiation for WHOLE company. Company instead of BUs is leading support inside organization ‘fertile ground’ for horizontal synergy strategy is necessity: BU/general management !!! 83 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 84 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 85 Leading firms have a very strong set of principles which heavily influence their behavior/culture Goldman Sachs 14 business principles 1. Our clients’ interests always come first. Our experience shows that if we serve our clients well, our own success will follow. 2. Our assets are people, capital and reputation. If any of these are ever lost, the last is the most difficult to regain. 3. We take great pride in the professional quality of our work. We have an uncompromising determination to achieve excellence in everything we undertake. 4. We stress creativity and imagination in everything we do. While recognizing that the old way may still be the best way, we constantly strive to find a better solution to a client’s problem. 5. We make an unusual effort to identify and recruit the very best person for every job. 86 Leading firms have a very strong set of principles which influence their behavior/culture (2) Goldman Sachs 14 business principles 6. We offer our people the opportunity to move ahead more rapidly than is possible at most other places. We have yet to find the limits to the responsibility that our best people are able to assume. 7. We stress teamwork in everything we do. We have no room for those who put their personal interests ahead of the interests of the firm and its clients. 8. The dedication of our people to the firm and the intense effort they give their jobs are greater than one finds in most other organizations. 9. Our profits are a key to our success. They replenish our capital and attract and keep our best people. It is our practice to share our profits generously with all who helped create them. 87 Leading firms have a very strong set of principles which influence their behavior/culture (3) Goldman Sachs 14 business principles 10. We consider our size an asset that we try hard to preserve. We want to be big enough to undertake the largest project that any of our clients could contemplate, yet small enough to maintain the loyalty, the intimacy and the esprit de corps that we all treasure and that contribute greatly to our success. 11. We constantly strive to anticipate rapidly changing needs of our clients and to develop new services to meet those needs. 12. To breach a confidence or to use confidential information improperly or carelessly would be unthinkable. 13. Our business is highly competitive, and we aggressively seek to expand our client relationships. 14. Integrity and honesty are the heart of our business. 88 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 89 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 90 Resources • • • • Human resources (human ‘beings’) Financial resources ICT resources Knowledge/ideas HRM FM IM KM GM requires a ‘holistic approach’ 91 To summarize Societal environment Industry environment Internal environment 92 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 93 4 Policy formation 94 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 95 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 96 Mission: what’s in a name? The purpose/reason for the organization’s existence. Alternatives: A broad mission A narrow mission 97 Mission: examples Broad mission We provide transportation vehicles to people throughout the world Narrow mission We build exclusive cars for the US and Europe 98 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 99 Vision (example) To become the leading European supplier of oriental products East India Companies, Netherlands (1602) 100 Vision (example) To make a contribution to the world by making tools for the mind that advance human kind Apple 101 Vision (example) To become the leading consumer marketing company in the USA and internationally Sara Lee Corporation 102 Vision (example) We want to be the leading supplier of PCs and PC servers in all customer segments Compaq Computer 103 Vision (example) Campina wil als cooperatieve onderneming met succes zuivel- en zuivelverwante producten van hoge kwaliteit op de markt brengen voor de consument en de industrie Campina 104 Vision (example) We want to provide value to our customers to make their lives better via lower prices and greater selection; all else is secondary Wal-Mart 105 Vision (example) We want to honorably serve the community by providing products and services of superior quality at a fair price to our customers Motorola 106 Vision is important according to Executives • • • 1,500 senior leaders/870 CEOs 20 different countries Key traits/talents and skills by year 2000 ‘Strong sense of vision’ is most important TRAIT (98%!) AND ‘Strategy formulation to achieve a vision’ is most important SKILL(gap of 25% with other skills) Source: Korn Ferry/Columbia University (1989) 107 What about skills and ability of managers? More than 90 percent of managers reported a lack in confidence in their own skills and ability to formate and implement a vision Source: Korn Ferry/Columbia University (1989) 108 Visions can help organizations ..... Make better strategic/operational decisions faster focus - “It’s easy to say what you’re going to do. The hard thing is figuring out what you’re not go-ing to do” (Michael Dell)/offers direction acquire required and wanted resources (employees /skills/investors)/stimulates development of certain capabilities (‘direction’) Promotes/accelerates change vision as ‘change road map’ (IBM) 109 Visions can help organizations (2) ..... Basic element for strategic plan the ‘building block’ strategic management process integrates short-term actions which have to be productive to long-term interests ‘compass’ for decentralized/global corporations It motivates and inspires individuals/groups their effort contributes to a larger picture employee pride and motivation >> performance Public Affairs-tool 110 Visie en visioen Visie = Visioen Collectief Individueel + Individueel! 111 What is a vision? Source: Jagersma (2007) It is a guide to corporate priorities that reflects a fact-based view of the future and sets forth aspirations that are demanding but achievable 112 Mission or vision? Mission = What is our Business? Source: Peter Drucker (1973) 113 Vision + mission + et cetera: what’s in a name? Source: Jagersma (2007) Question Answer Who are we? Mission Where are we heading? Vision How do we get there? Strategy How do ‘I’ contribute? Targets/Bonus/ Incentives (APs) 114 ‘Vision rollout process’ (‘VRP’) = A process in which relevant employees meet in small groups - with their peers, supervisors, and /or more senior managers - to learn about the vision + discuss what it means for them Technique to encompass the ‘three requirements’ Two basic forms: A cascade rollout, which moves through functions or units down the company/organization A horizontal rollout, which involves peer group meetings 115 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 116 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 117 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 118 Objectives and goals: what’s in a name? Objectives are ‘qualitative’ by nature (longrange and short-term objectives) Goals are quantified objectives Achievement should result in fulfilling of VISION 119 Specific objectives/goals • • • • • • • • Profitability Quality ([T]QM/EFQM) Efficiency (low-cost operations) Teamwork/productivity Effectiveness (customer orientation) Flexibility Corporation: ‘good place to be’ ..... 120 Specific examples • • • Achieve a ROI of 10% for the period 2008’09 (short-term goal) Become number one in global automotive market share by 2012 (long-term objective) Increase domestic car and truck market share by more than 5,15 procent by Q3 in 2013 (long-term goal) 121 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 122 Strategy: what’s in a name? • • • • Corporate strategy Business strategy Competitive strategy Functional strategy 1 Hierarchy 2 Interrelated 3 Coordination/ Integration 123 Corporate strategy: what’s in a name? Source: Jagersma (2008) A corporate strategy states: • • How and where the corporation will growth /divest activities (external coordination) and How the corporation will optimize its internal organization (internal coordination) ..... and therefore will achieve its vision and objectives/goals Corporate strategy ‘describes’ how an organization intends to achieve its vision and objectives/goals 124 Corporate strategy: questions to be answered • • • • • • Should we stay in the same business(es)? Should we leave this business entirely or just parts of it by merging, liquidating, and/or selling part of our corporation? Should we try to grow in this business by start-ups, alliances, or M&A? Should we try to grow internationally? Should we grow in another business? ..... 125 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 126 Business strategy: what’s in a name? Source: Jagersma (2008) A business strategy states: • • How and where the BU will growth/divest activities (external coordination) and, How the BU will optimize its internal organization (internal coordination) ..... and therefore will achieve its vision and objectives/goals Business strategy ‘describes’ how a business unit intends to achieve its vision and objectives/goals 127 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 128 Competitive strategy: what’s in a name? Source: Jagersma (2008) Five dimensions an integrated set of actions aimed at achieving a sustainable reputation in an industry (segment) that is over competitors in serving markets by finding alternatives to produce a better relationship between cost and benefits for customers. 129 Competitive strategy: five key words Source: Jagersma (2008) Key words Implications for general manager Actions Do something different than ‘business as usual’ Find long-term position not easily duplicated Achieve lower cost or more benefits for same cost or both (Re)action(s)? Understand why they buy Sustainable Reputation Competitors Customers 130 Three characteristics of good competitive strategies Customer:clear product/market definition (i.e., business/value proposition) global 2 Market national 1 exclusive mass Product 131 Three characteristics of good competitive strategies (2) Company: cost/benefit leadership (relative and real or perceived) Benefits more industry average better positioning worse positioning Cost more expensive 132 Three characteristics of good competitive strategies (3) Competitors: sustainability Customers’ needs/preferences change continuous- ly Competition is dynamic process: own actions influence those of competitors (‘game theory’) 133 Types of sustainable competitive advantage Structural advantages resource access (Gazprom; BHP Biliton et cetera) market dominance (eBay) switching barriers (Microsoft) governmental effects - regulation (Telmex) Reputation corporate image (Amex) corporate identity (Rabobank; Goldman Sachs) 134 Types of sustainable competitive advantage (2) Business system/value chain superiority superior performance in one function(s) (Merck; McKinsey; ‘outsourcing virtuosos’) Metaskills innovation (Apple) organizational skills - time-based competition (3M) adaptability (Nokia) 135 A good competitive strategy will tell you ..... Which Customer segments to emphasize What Competitors count in each segment How long the Company’s advantage can be expected to last: sustainability of position What to do functionally? Functional strategies 136 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 137 Functional strategy: what’s in a name? An integrated set of actions aimed at achieving a sustainable competitive advantage in a functional element of the value chain/business system, that is over competitors Marketing/sales strategy Logistics strategy R&D strategy Tax management strategy HRM strategy ..... 138 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 139 4 Policy implementation 140 Policy implementation: what’s in a name? The process by which decisions are put into action by action programs/actions operational execution ANNUAL PLANS 141 Action programs: what’s in a name? • • What is needed (resources) to realize specific functional objectives and goals (what to do; how to do it; when to do it; and what do we need?) Embedded in annual plans of business units /departments of Corporate Center/HQ (budget) 142 Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process INGREDIENTS Scanning the environment External - Societal - Industry Internal - Structure - Culture - Resources Policy formation Mission Vision Objectives Goals Strategies (C, B, C, F) ‘FIT’ Policy roll-out Policy evaluation Action programs (margin) BBS/EFQM (performance) 143 5 Policy evaluation/control 144 Introduction To measure is the first step to improve 145 Evaluation and control: what’s in a name? The process in which strategies, choices, decisions, actions etc and performance results are monitored so that actual performance can be compared with desired performance 146 Evaluation and control: tools BBS/EFQM/INK 147 Evaluation and control: (1) BBS (Kaplan and Norton, 1992) Financial Perspective Customer Perspective (How do customers see us?) Goals/Measures (How do we look to shareholders?) Goals/Measures Innovation + Learning Perspective Internal Business Perspective (What must we excel at?) Goals/Measures (Can we continue to improve + create value?) Goals/Measures 148 Evaluation and control: (2) EFQM / INK-’Model Nederlandse Kwaliteit’ (MANS, 1995) Resultaat elementen Ondernemingsresultaten Waardering door personeel Waardering door klanten Waardering door maat’pij Management van processen Organisatie elementen Middelenmanagement Personeelsmanagement Beleid & Strategie Leiderschap 149 Policy evaluation/control (BBS/EFQM/INK) General Management: to summarize What were/are our aspirations? (Mission and Vision) How much to grow/contract? (Objectives and Goals) Which initiatives do we need? (Strategy and Action Programs) What is our ‘platform’? (SWOT) to achieve our aspiration(s) 150