Tandayag and Bio-os Marine Sanctuaries
PRIDE CAMPAIGN PROJECT PLAN
Office of the Governor
Environment and Natural Resources Division
Capitol Area, Dumaguete City, Negros Oriental, Philippines
June 2011
Anabele B. Barillo1 and Job D. Tagle2
1 ENRD- Office of the Governor
2 MENRO-Municipality of Amlan
2
Campaign Project Plan Table of Contents
(Once the project plan is complete insert page numbers for each section)
A. Executive Summary
1. Introduction - Framing the problem
2. Campaign Theory of Change: a strategy for change - Table and narrative
3. Site summary
4. Project team & key strategic partners
B. Social marketing profile
1. Formative Research - TWG & Stakeholder meetings consensus workshop outputs; Directed Conversations; FGD; Photo voice
2. Concept Model
3. Results Chain
4. Establishing a baseline: quantitative survey
5. Understanding our audience
6. Marketing mix
7. Creative brief
C. MPA Governance and Management plan (BROP)
1. Abstract
2. Introduction
3. Objectives
4. MPA profile
5. Action plan
6. Funding opportunities
D. Monitoring plan
(In excel) SMART objectives for:
KAP
BR,BC,TR
CR
E. Work Plan with Budget
(In excel)
F. Endorsement of this plan
3
G. References and Acknowledgements
H. Appendices
1. Fisheries profile
2. Executive Order for TWG & Mancom
3. Survey Questionnaire
4. Survey results
5. EcoGov MPA Effectiveness Rating
6. Letters of Support
7. Threat ranking
8. Factor chain
4
A.EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. Introduction - Framing the problem
Philippines as the centre of the centre of global marine biodiversity
Scientists refer to the 7,107 islands that make up the Philippines as the “center of the center” of global marine biodiversity. Its waters are home to
whales, dolphins, 50 species of sea horses and over 2,000 species fish, including the largest fish in the world, the whale shark. Marine resources are
also critical to the food security and livelihoods of Filipinos, as fish provide over 50% of their protein and support the livelihoods of millions of
fishers and fish-related industries throughout the country. The Philippines is located in the Coral Triangle, a vast region in Southeast Asia made up
of 18,500 islands and 647 million hectares of ocean. It is often referred to as the “nursery of the seas” because of the more than 500 species of
coral and hundreds of thousands of hectares of sea grass and coastal mangrove forests that shelter and sustain a level of marine diversity
unmatched anywhere on the planet.
Species and Habitat under Complex Threats
Today, however the global center of marine biodiversity is under extreme pressure. Over 40% of the reef and mangroves in the region have
disappeared in the last 40 years. Near-shore overfishing is a serious threat to these natural resources, and reversing the effects will require a
significant change in human behavior. Less than five percent of the Philippines’ coral reef ecosystems are still in pristine health, and in some fishing
grounds, biomass is less than 10% of what it was 50 years ago. Most near-shore fishing is conducted by subsistence fishers in coastal communities
although illegal intrusions by commercial fishers into municipal waters are cause for concern.
A Campaign to Transform the Context
Developing local approaches to addressing the threat of overfishing is increasingly recognized as vital to long-term economic and environmental
sustainability in the region. The vision behind this plan, and the current cohort of 12 campaign developed under the Rare Pride Program in the
Philippines, is to facilitate true community buy and ownership of the local Marine Protected Areas building on the tools developed in 20 years of
experience in MPA management in the Philippines and combining it with the Rare Pride Methodology for social marketing. Through this strategy
the objective is to get the local fishers population as well as the wider community in the Barangays surrounding the MPA to take ownership in and
understand the benefit of no-take-areas and support essential management activities such as enforcement and governance of the MPA.
5
Cohort Theory of change: a strategy for change
In order to eliminate the principle threat of overfishing and destructive fishing the governance and enforcement infrastructures of the no-takezone (NTZ) at 12 sites in the Philippines will be strengthened via a proven self-assessment and planning tool, the Participatory Coastal Resources
Assessment tool (PCRA). Key target audiences (local fishers and gleaners; the local community, the MPA enforcement team and local LGU officials)
will be informed of the benefits of the No Take Zone (NTZ), the rules of the sanctuary, and the processes for becoming more engaged in the MPA
management committee. Fishers and gleaners will come to believe in MPA as a tool for food security, and will support new reporting structures for
arrests and prosecution of intruders. The conservation results will include increased perceived fish catch, increases in fish numbers and species
richness, increase in invertebrates, and increase in coral reef health.
6
2. Tandayag and Bio-os Pride Campaign Theory of Change
Theory of Change formula:
K + A + IC + BR BC TR CR
Primary Target
Audience:
Fishers of
Tandayag and
Bio-os
(Fishers=
Fishermen and
Gleaners)
Tandayag and
Bio-os fishers
become aware of
the benefits of
the MPA and
know the MPA
rules about not
intruding and
who to report
intruders to
Tandayag and
Bio-os fishers
believed that the
MPA will benefit
them if nobody
intrudes to the
MPA and
believed that
they have an
important role to
play by not
intruding into the
MPA and by
reporting
violators.
Tandayag and
Bio-os fishers
increased
discussion among
themselves about
the benefits they
get from the
MPA if nobody
intrudes and
about the
important role
they have to play
in reporting
intruders and by
not intruding in
the MPA
Tandayag and Bioos fishers get
involved in MPA
management
meetings and
activities related
to the MPA
Enforcement
infrastructure,
reporting system,
equipment and
facilities need to
be in place and
working
Tandayag and Bioos fishers follow
the Tandayag and
Bio-os MPA rules
and regulations
(Stop intruding)
and report
intrusions to
enforcement the
team
The excessive
removal of coral
reef fishes and
invertebrates
caused by
intrusion in the
MPA is
decreased if not
totally eliminated
Increase in coral
cover, fish
abundance/
biomass,
invertebrates
inside the MPA
by 2012
7
K + A + IC + BR BC TR CR
Secondary
Target
Audience:
MPA Law
Enforcement
Team
Tandayag and
Bio-os MPA
Enforcement
Team know the
importance of
their role in
ensuring an
effective 24/7
guard system in
order to get
these benefits
Tandayag
Enforcement
Team believed
that 24/7
guarding
/patrolling
system and their
role are crucial in
order to get the
benefits of the
MPA
Tandayag and
Bio-os
Enforcement
Team would
increase
discussion among
themselves about
the importance
of 24/7
guarding/patrolli
ng system and
their role in
effective MPA
management in
order to get the
benefits of the
MPA
Strengthened in
the enforcement
of Tandayag and
Bio-os MPA rules
and regulations
through the
following:
- regular meetings
to review roles
and protocols of
enforcement team
Tandayag MPA
enforcement team
follow the agreed
24/7 schedule of
patrolling and
improves
coordination
among Team
members
Threats to
Tandayag and
Bio-os MPA
caused by
intrusion will be
reduced through
95% strict
enforcement of
MPA rules and
regulations
Increase in coral
cover, fish
abundance/
biomass,
invertebrates
inside the MPA
by 2012
-Introduce the
logbook system
-Improve
enforcement
infrastructure
(guardhouse and
marker buoys) and
materials
(gasoline)
8
K + A + IC + BR BC TR CR
Primary Target
Audience:
Communities of
Tandayag and
Bio-os
Tandayag and
Bio-os coastal
community are
- aware on the
importance and
benefits of their
MPA
-aware on the
need for MPA
governance and
enforcement and
the significance
of their
participation in
enforcement
(reporting
violations) and
governance
Tandayag and
Bio-os coastal
community will:
- realize the
importance of
the MPA and
develop the
strong sense of
ownership over it
-improved their
level of trust to
the enforcement
team and
believed they
should report
intrusions to
them
Discussion
among Tandayag
/ Bio-os
community
members is
centered on the
importance of
their role in
reporting
intrusions to
improve MPA
enforcement and
benefits
Tandayag and Bioos community
representatives
get involved in
MPA management
meetings and
contributed to
informed decisions
related to MPA
management
Reporting system
needs to be in
place and working
Tandayag and Bioos coastal
communities will
get involved in the
governance and
enforcement by
actively
participating in the
monitoring and
evaluation of their
MPA, coastal cleanup, public
consultations and
events and become
more vigilant in
passing intelligence
report to the
enforcement team
the main threat
to the
biodiversity
health is reduced
through
reporting of
violations.
Increase in coral
cover, fish
abundance/
biomass,
invertebrates
inside the MPA
by 2012
9
K + A + IC + BR BC TR CR
Secondary
Target
Audience:
Amlan LGU
Employees
The Amlan-LGU
employees
become aware of
the basic concept
of the MPA, the
benefits of the
presence of the
Tandayag and
Bio-os MPAs and
the need to
support MPA
activities and
promote the
concept across
the municipality
The Amlan-LGU
employees will
believed in the
importance of
having MPAs and
want to promote
the idea to other
town residents
and support MPA
related activities
Increased
discussion among
Amlan-LGU
employees about
the importance
of having the
MPAs, promoting
the idea to other
town residents
and supporting
MPA related
activities
Develop a
program of MPArelated activities
that the LGU
employees can
participate in
Amlan-LGU
employees will be
actively involved in
activities related to
Tandayag and Bioos MPAs
Reduced fishing
in Tandayag and
Bio-os MPAs and
Buffer Zones
Increase in coral
cover, fish
abundance/
biomass,
invertebrates
inside the MPA
by 2012
Participate in MPA
activities and
promote MPA
concept. For those
jobs who are
related to the MPA,
support MPA
activities through
their work
10
Theory of Change narrative:
To achieve the conservation results of 5% increase in coral cover and fish abundance, and 2% invertebrates inside the MPA in two years, 95% of the
fishing community should be aware on the importance and benefits of their MPA and the need to enforce MPA rules and regulations. Through the
90% change in the community’s perception, 80% of the dialogue among themselves is centered at how they could be more proactive in improving
MPA enforcement and governance. This dialogue will lead to 70% vigilance and reporting of intrusion in the MPA. This strengthened enforcement
will consequently decrease about 65% in the removal of fish from the MPA. The Pride Campaign is fundamental in changing the behavior of the
fishing community from being inactive to more proactive in the enforcement.
11
3. Site summary
Project Name
Project Name
Tandayag and Bio-os Pride Campaign
Project Data Effective Date
2011-06-02
Project Scope and Vision
Scope/Site Name
Tandayag and Bio-os Marine Sanctuaries
Scope/Site Description
Barangay Tandayag is in the municipality of Amlan, a 5th class municipality situated on the Eastern Coast of Negros
Island. Amlan lies 21 kilometers North of Dumaguete City, the Provincial Capital of Negros Oriental, Central Visayas,
Philippines. It is bounded to the East by Tañon Strait. It has eight (8) barangays, five of which have coastal areas while
the other three are completely landlocked.
The coastal zone of Barangay Tandayag is characterized by sandy to rocky shoreline and fringing coral reefs. Tandayag
has a marine sanctuary established in 1996, with a total area of 9.22 hectares, including the buffer zone.
There are 142 fish species, with a mean total reef fish density of 2307/500m2 and a mean total reef fish biomass of
42.3 kg/ 500m2 (Stockwell 2007).
Overfishing, due to the intrusion of commercial fishers in the municipal waters, resulted to declining fish catch
affecting the 431 fishermen who are mainly dependent on the coastal resources.
Vision Statement Text
A well-informed, responsible and committed Tandayag and Bio-os fishing communities capable of sustaining learned
behavior to achieve the increased in live coral cover and fish biomass for a long-term conservation benefits.
Biodiversity Features
Biodiversity Area
The Marine Protected Area of Tandayag has a total area of 9.22 hectares including the buffer zone (core zone is 6
hectares). It is within the municipal waters of 24.5 hectares (7km coastline and 3.5 km drawn perpendicular)
12
Biodiversity Background
2
1.1. 142 fish species, mean total reef fish density 2307/500m2 mean total reef fish biomass 42.3 kg/ 500m ,mean top
2
predatory reef fish biomass 6.2 kg/ 500m (Stockwell 2007)
Coral cover for the Tandayag marine sanctuary was low along the reef slope and moderate in the shallows along the
reef flat. Both habitats had large amounts of sand, which is typical of patch reefs along the coastline of Negros
Oriental. The low levels of rubble indicate little if any damage from blasting or storms. However, the relatively high
amount of dead coral with algae (DCA) along the flat is a bit alarming. DCA is the result of recently killed coral that has
been colonized by algae. This may be the result of a disturbance such as crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS), disease, or
the absence of herbivores in the reef. Coral cover it not likely to increase drastically over the years due the lack of
appropriate hard substrate for the corals to colonize (Stockwell 2007).
2.1. Stockwell, Brian, Jadloc, Claro Renato, Maypa, Jasper P. and Portia Nillos-Kleiven. 2007.
Preliminary Report: Biophysical Survey of Coral Reefs in Amlan, Negros Oriental. Silliman University Angelo King
Center for Research and Environmental Management (SUAKCREM), Silliman University, Dumaguete City, 6200
2.2. Results of the PCRA showed that live hard coral cover in the Tandayag marine reserve was at 28%. Sand (23%)
and rubble (16%) were the other major substrate types. (Amlan PCRA 2007) Method used: point intercept
2.3. 1996 Fish Count (1995 survey by CEMRINO)
Fish composition- 106 species of reef fish of 6,438 individuals (1500m2)
Average live coral cover 30-50% (whole Tandayag area, method 14 manta tows)
Video tapes- first results indicated good live coral cover to a water depth of 5-7 m. In deeper areas (15-20), live coral
cover decreased rapidly with sand being the predominant substrate type. A quantitative assessment of the 5 video
transects indicated a live coral cover of 22%.
2.4. The municipality of Amlan has a total of 23 mangrove and associated species which can be found in Barangay
Tandayag (which has 8 species) and Bio-os (17 species) (p.53 Citation: Yambao, A.C., A.T. White, W.E. Ablong and M.R.
Alcala. 2001. Coastal Environmental Profile of Negros Oriental, Philippines. Coastal Resource Management Project,
Cebu City, Philippines, 107p.
3.0. Vegetation Types
In the coastal area:
13
Mangroves species:
Rhizophora, Sonneratia, Avicennia species, Nypa fruticans
Protected Area Information
Protected Area Categories
Category V: Protected Seascape
Category VI: Managed Resource Protected Area
Legal Status
Apart from being established as the Marine Protected Area under Ordinance No. 03, S. 2007, Tandayag and Bio-os are
also within the Tañon Strait, a protected seascape under Presidential Proclamation No. 1234. The legal steps for the
Tañon Strait did not reach Congressional Action though.
Legislative Context
Hard Enforcement:
1. Tandayag Marine Sanctuary-Legally established through the Municipal Ordinance No. 02, Series of 1996.
2. Bio-os Marine Sanctuary- Municipal Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1999.
Municipal Ordinance No. 03, Series of 2007: A Comprehensive Municipal Ordinance for the Sustainable Development,
Management, Conservation and Protection of the Municipal Waters and its Coastal and Fishery Resources,
Harmonizing and Integrating All Ordinances Pertinent thereto and for other purposes., otherwise known as “Amlan
Comprehensive Coastal Resource Management Ordinance.”
Physical Description
Only a very small portion of the total land area of the municipality is flat. Except for plains along the coastline, the
terrain of the municipality is generally hilly and mountainous. There is, therefore a tendency of the soil to be carried
down by the water during heavy rains. The silting of waterways, channels, roads and harbors evidenced this.
Improper farming practices and indiscriminate cutting of trees on the mountainsides can further aggravate the
erosion problem.
The coastal area of Tandayag is characterized by fringing reef and sandy to rocky shoreline. Coral cover in the
Tandayag marine sanctuary was low along the reef slope and moderate in the shallows along the reef flat. Both
habitats had large amounts of sand, which is typical of patch reefs along the coastline of Negros Oriental.
Bio-os shoreline is sand
Biological Description
Tandayag MPA- fringing reef
14
Bio-os MPA – Offshore reef
Socio-Economic Information Among the notable industrial institutions of Amlan are the oil depots of Caltex Philippines, Shell Philippines, and
Petron. It has also the Tandayag Port, which is accessible by small boats coming from Cebu. The National Power
Corporation has the control power system for the primary lines supplying the Negros Island, Cebu and Panay Island,
and also maintains a hydro-electric plant in Amlan.
The total commercial land use in the Urban Area is 34.48 hectares. The town is very poor in commerce and trade, in
spite of its Tandayag wharf and industries which support its commercial activities.
Most of the fishermen in Tandayag and Bio-os depend entirely on fishing for their livelihood. Others have part time
job like, carpentry, labor work and farming during off season for fishing. Some of the fishermen who are Bantay Dagat
members could also earn through their honoraria given to them by the local government unit and the Barangay.
Historical Description
The marine protected areas of Tandayag and Bio-os were established in 1996 and 1999, respectively by the Local
Government Unit, through the initiative of the Center for the Establishment of Marine Protected Areas in Negros
Oriental (CEMRINO), a European Union Funded NGO and the German Development Service and in partnership with
the Provincial Government of Negros Oriental and the local government unit of Amlan and the support of the
Barangay Council of Tandayag and Bio-os.
Cultural Description
The town observes its annual fiesta every 30th of November, the Patron Saint being St. Andrew. On that day, all roads
lead to the municipality, as it is a National Holiday, being Andres Bonifacio Day. On the other hand, the town can
equal if not excel other municipalities in social as well as in cultural affairs. Modesty aside, Amlan has been chosen as
the cleanest and greenest town of the Oriental Negros and certified healthy municipality by the Regional Health
Office.
The most popular activity in the barangay is the celebration of fiestas. Barangay Tandayag celebrates its annual fiesta
every June 29 in honor of Saints Peter and Paul. Sitio Cooton also celebrates fiesta every March 15 and Upper
Tandayag celebrates fiesta every April 18. Almost all Tandayaganons celebrate the annual town fiesta every
November 30.
Access Information
The Tandayag marine sanctuary is in proximity to the provincial highway. Visitors could walk about 300 meters from
the highway.
Barangay Tandayag is traversed by the National road which links the two Negros Provinces. Passenger vehicles plying
the Dumaguete to Bacolod route, Dumaguete-Mabinay-Kabankalan, Dumaguete-Bais, Dumaguete-Guihulngan routes
and the north bound route pass by Barangay Tandayag at regular route which is 19 kilometers from Dumaguete City.
15
A number of jeepneys also ply the Amlan-Dumaguete route.
Tricyles, jeepneys, motorcycles, bicycles, are the common means of transportation for inftro-municipal travel. The
interior portion of the barangay can be passed through the farm to market road.
The Tandayag Wharf in the southern portion of this barangay serves as the gateway to Cebu. Ferry boats for interisland transfer are available from early in the morning till late in the afternoon.
Visitation Information
Because of its fine beaches, Amlan boasts a lucrative domestic tourism industry. The more popular beachfronts are
Greenhouse, Dalisay, Bomediano, and Baguio Beach in Mag-abo.
As part of the CRM program, Amlan also endeavors to increase local and international tourism by promoting diving
and snorkeling in its municipal waters.
Amlan also boasts for its beautiful waterfalls, rivers, hiking areas and mountain biking trails that could be sustainably
developed and promoted as eco-tourism destinations.
Current uses of the MPA
and adjacent coastline
The total land area of the barangay is 524 hectares, eighteen point eighteen percent (18.18%) is coastal, forty five
point six percent ( 45.6 % ) is plain and thirty point thirty six percent ( 30.36 ) is mountainous. Of these terrain
characteristics, 19.29 hectares are for residential, .69 has. Is for commercial, .21 has. are for industrial, 1.39 has. For
institutional and 502.42 has. Is for agricultural (MPDO Amlan).
Management Resources
The management of Tandayag MPA is currently under the supervision of the Municipal Environment and Natural
Resources Office (MENRO) through its deputized Bantay Dagat or Fish Wardens
IUCN Red-list Species
Red-List Species
1) Marine Turtle
Chelonia mydas (Linnaeus, 1758)
English Name: Green turtle
Red List Category and Criteria: Endangered A2bd ver 3.1
Green turtles, like other sea turtle species, are particularly susceptible to population declines because of their
vulnerability to anthropogenic impacts during all life-stages: from eggs to adults. Perhaps the most detrimental human
threats to green turtles are the intentional harvests of eggs and adults from nesting beaches and juveniles and adults
16
from foraging grounds. Unfortunately, harvest remains legal in several countries despite substantial subpopulation
declines (e.g., Humphrey and Salm 1996, Fleming 2001, Fretey 2001). In addition, a number of incidental threats
impact green turtles around the world. These threats affect both terrestrial and marine environments, and include
bycatch in marine fisheries, habitat degradation at nesting beaches and feeding areas, and disease. Mortality
associated with entanglement in marine fisheries is the primary incidental threat; the responsible fishing techniques
include drift netting, shrimp trawling, dynamite fishing, and long-lining. Degradation of both nesting beach habitat and
marine habitats also play a role in the decline of many Green Turtle stocks. Nesting habitat degradation results from
the construction of buildings, beach armoring and re-nourishment, and/or sand extraction (Lutcavage et al. 1997).
These factors may directly, through loss of beach habitat, or indirectly, through changing thermal profiles and
increasing erosion, serve to decrease the quantity and quality of nesting area available to females, and may evoke a
change in the natural behaviors of adults and hatchlings (Ackerman 1997). The presence of lights on or adjacent to
nesting beaches alters the behavior of nesting adults (Witherington 1992) and is often fatal to emerging hatchlings as
they are attracted to light sources and drawn away from the water (Witherington and Bjorndal 1990). Habitat
degradation in the marine environment results from increased effluent and contamination from coastal development,
construction of marinas, increased boat traffic, and harvest of nearshore marine algae resources. Combined, these
impacts diminish the health of coastal marine ecosystems and may, in turn, adversely affect green turtles. For
example, degradation of marine habitats has been implicated in the increasing prevalence of the tumor-causing
Fibropapilloma disease (George 1997). (August 23, 2010) http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/4615/0
Other Notable Species
Other Notable Species
Groupers (Epinephelus miniata, Cephalopholis sp.); Rabbitfishes (Siganus guttatus); Fusiliers (Caesio cuning);
Butterflyfishes (Chaetodon sp.); Snappers (Lutjanus monostigma); Parrotfishes (Scarus sp.)
Location and Topography
MPA Latitude
9° 26’ (minutes) 32.55” east
MPA Longitude
123°13’ (minutes) 22.98“ north
Country
Philippines
17
States/Provinces
Negros Oriental
Municipalities
Amlan
Legislative Districts
District II
Location Details
Barangay Tandayag is situated 1.6 km. south of Barangay Poblacion and 19.4 kms. away from the Provincial Capitol. It
is bounded on the north by Barangay Poblacion, on the south th the Tañon Strait, on the west by Barangay Siapo and
on the south by Barangay Tampi of San Jose.
Site Map Reference
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&source=s_d&saddr=Amlan,+Negros+Oriental,+Philippines&daddr=&hl=en&geoco
de=&mra=ls&sll=9.444363,123.18013&sspn=0.184236,0.338173&ie=UTF8&t=h&z=12&iwloc=
Comments
Any additional information about your site’s location that has not been included above, but you think you
will need to be included in your site summary.
Human Stakeholders
Human Stakeholder
Population Size
22,173
Social Context
The municipality of Amlan is comprised of eight (8) barangays, five (5) of which are coastal. The total population of the
entire municipality is 22,173.
Rare Pride Campaign
Threats addressed by campaign
Other threats at site
Threats impacting the MPA NTZ that campaign will address; include IUCN categories
Include other threats not addressed by campaign that may impact the NTZ; leave blank if not
applicable
Number of communities in campaign area
Target audiences
Fishermen and gleaners
TA 1.A (Fishers, Tandayag -120) Fishers=Fishermen and Gleaners
TA 1.B (Fishers, Bio-os – 70)
TA 2 (Enforcement Team-55)
TA 3.A (Tandayag Community- 4,000)
TA 3.B (Bio-os Community – 3,000) BC-
18
Biodiversity area (ha)
Habitat
Biodiversity hotspot(s)
Flagship species common name
Flagship species scientific name
Flagship species details (<200 words)
Campaign ambassador
TA 4 (Amlan-236) LGU Employees=206, TWG members=30)
Tandayag 6.58; Bio-os 8.87
Coral Reefs
Coral triangle
Red Grouper (locally known as Lapu-lapu)
Epinephelus miniata
This species was chosen because this is a high-valued species found in the marine sanctuaries
of Tandayag and Bio-os and this needs protection since its population is declining.
Kuya Kim is a TV personality who became famous in his love of animals. He has a TV Program
named “Batang Lawin” – about animals.
Cohort ambassador
19
4. Project team and stakeholders
Lead Agency and Pride Conservation Fellow
#
Name
1
TEVES, MERCY
2
BARILLO, ANABELE
3
DE LA PENA, JOAQUIN
4
AMARO, LUCENA
5
BARILLO, MANRIC
6
RAMIREZ, MARIA
VICTORIA
7
AGUILAR, REY
Position
Division Chief
CRM Technical
Staff
Section Chief
Section Chief
Provincial CRM
Coordinator
District
Operation
Supervisor
Field Worker
Organization
Contact details
ENRD-Office of the
Governor
mcyteves@gmail.com
0939-204-0676/ +63 (35) 2255563
ENRD-Office of the
Governor
ENRD-Office of the
Governor
ENRD-Office of the
Governor
ENRD-Office of the
Governor
ENRD-Office of the
Governor
anabarillo_negor@yahoo.com
ENRD-Office of the
Governor
Role in relation to campaign
Pride Campaign Supervisor/ Project Leader
Pride Conservation Fellow
0920-429-1314
Campaign Advisor
0949.170.2866
Alternate Campaign Supervisor
0905-975-8118
Pride Campaign TWG Member, Provides assistance
in workshops and planning
0926.534.1946
Pride Campaign TWG Member, Key contact to
Barangay Council
0926.602.8259
Pride Campaign TWG Member, Key contact to
Church
20
Strategic partners/key stakeholders
#
Name
1
2
DE LA CRUZ, BENTHAM
Position
Municipal Mayor
TAGLE, JOB
MENRO-designate
3
ABIERRA
MAO
4
SILORIO, GEOFFREY
Department Head
Organization
Contact details
+63 (35) 417-0694
LGU-Amlan
Municipal
Environment and
0917-314-3299/
Natural Resources
+63 (35) 417-0694
Office (MENRO)loc. 114
Amlan
Municipal Agriculture
Office (MAO)
Municipal Planning
and Development
Office
+63 (35) 417.0694
loc. 102
Role in relation to campaign
Key in the success of Pride Campaign implementation
Pride Campaign TWG member; Community
mobilization, Supervise Coastal Law enforcement
Pride Campaign TWG member; MPA planning,
Provides technical assistance (Livelihood- Barrier
Removal)
Pride Campaign TWG member ; Gives advice in MPA
planning, Ensures budget allocation for Pride
Campaign
During the planning phase of the campaign a Technical Working Group (TWG) and a management Committee (ManCom) were formed/
strengthened to help support the governance and management of the MPA. Please refer to the MPA Governance and Management Plan (Section C
of this document) for further details and composition of these two bodies.
21
B.SOCIAL MARKETING PROFILE
The planning work conducted was ground-truthed with a range of key stakeholders and experts through stakeholder meetings, focus group
discussions and one-on-one interviews. These helped to build a composite portrait of the campaign target audiences, and design the quantitative
survey (Section B4 and Appendix H) which was subsequently carried out across the campaign target area. The quantitative survey will both help us
understand our primary audiences and allow us to establish a baseline for measuring change after the Pride campaign.
The formative research section below aims to provide a record of all qualitative research conducted, people spoken to and key outputs. The
sequences in which the results of the formative research are presented here do not necessarily correspond to the chronology in which the data was
collected, and in some cases, multiple iterations of the research, such as directed conversations with target audiences, were required.
1. Formative research
Include a record of all qualitative research conducted, people spoken to and key outputs. At a minimum this section should include a list of all
experts and key stakeholders spoken to and key findings from the conversations. Also include key outputs from the consensus workshop and vote on
benefits at your TWG and stakeholder meeting.
Directed Conversations with Experts:
1. Claro Renato L. Jadloc – Master of Science in Biology/ Researcher, Silliman University Angelo King Center for Research and Environmental
Management (SUAKCREM) Jan. 11, 2011
a. What do you think is the best tool to address marine biodiversity threats, specifically on coral reefs and fish biomass? - Marine Reserves seems the
only viable option in developed nations like ours. Conventional management practices for fisheries are either impractical or difficult to implement.
Marine Reserves have been shown to prevent overfishing. As part of strategy, there is a need to do some efforts to look for alternative livelihood for
fishers to decrease exploitation pressure in the sea.
In the case of conservation, holistic approach is also important, especially in reducing upland siltation which caused a substantial impact to the
marine biodiversity health.
b. Since you have done some research in Tandayag Marine Sanctuary, what can you say about its current size and what are your thoughts about the
viability of expanding or increasing the size? - The rule of thumb, as many would say, 20% of the whole reef area should set aside for MPA. Of
course the size would matter in terms of recovery; however, we should also consider the fishermen’s fishing ground.
22
As to the viability, the southern part can still be increased up to 150 meters. At the northern part, right after the protected area, it’s mostly sandy, but I
do not know if there are still patches of reefs after that sandy area.
In a perfect world, it is good to increase the size. However, this does not seem the situation in this world. Compromise comes into play; we have to
consider the stakeholders.
c. Since, you are familiar with the area in Tandayag after having conducted research in 2002, 2007 and 2008, what marine organisms have seen
unique in the area that could be considered a flagship species for the Rare Pride Campaig?- Well, I have seen a baby black tip shark. However, this
may not be a good flagship species considering that most fishermen, as you we know them, don’t like a shark as they think of it as their competitor.
The area has large predators like groupers, snapper and emperors that could be considered as your flagship species. Bryan and I saw a large school of
fish of various species forming like a rock wall in one of our dives before.
d. How do think could the benefits of MPA in both sites (Bio-os and Tandayag) be increased?- Promote tourism. Though tourism in the area is
already starting, the LGU has to package well to invite more tourists to the area.
e. How would you compare enforcement at the near shore MPA to the offshore one? - It is more difficult to enforce in the offshore marine reserves,
however, it really depends on the support of the LGU in terms of funding and logistics and the level of community acceptance. Enforcement efforts
will be lesser if there is community acceptance to the establishment of the marine reserve.
2. Rene A. Abesamis – James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
a. What are your views about MPAs? – Mechanism to bring back what is lost. MPAs will take a long time to reach certain levels to how they were
25-35 years ago. The good thing about MPAs is that they potentially subsidize through larval distribution to the fishes. There is no high amount of
evidence that would show where a particular larvae came from.
b. Do you think MPA is the best option for habitat management? – It is the best, but should not be the only option.
c. What are your thoughts on the participation of community in MPA enforcement? – The community should always be there, however, we can’t
demand it.
-If all MPAs are well protected (e.g. >20 years) , recruitment to fished areas may increase by >250% (3.5 times).
Directed Conversations with Stakeholders:
23
Job D. Tagle, MENRO-Designate, Amlan (Nov. 23, 2010)
a. I know that enforcement is going on for both Tandayag and Bio-os MPAs, do you think we still consider enforcement team as one of our target
audiences for this Rare Pride campaign? Yes. I would still like to include the enforcement team because we would like to adopt a very good
enforcement system. Right now, there are still fishermen who can intrude in both of the MPAs.
Dionaldo Omole, Former PO President of Tandayag MPA; became the Barangay Captain in the Village; and now is absorbed by the LGU as
MENRO staff (Jan 05, 2011):
a. Do coastal communities understand the purpose of the MPA in Tandayag?- Yes. But there are some people who would just intentionally get inside
the MPA.
b. Do nearby communities participate in the MPA activities or enforcement? - No. People would just say that enforcement is the work of the Bantay
Dagat.
c. What do you think of increasing the MPA size?- It’s good to increase the size at the northern and southern boundaries rather than towards
offshore because it is where most fishermen fish.
Directed Conversations with Fishers
TWG Meeting
-
One hundred percent (100%) of the participants agreed that they have received the benefits of the marine protected area (MPA) they have
enumerated. For the focus question on how to improve the benefits of the MPA, the participants identified four major strategies which include
sufficient allocation of funds, strengthening enforcement, continuous education/ campaign and MPA expansion (increasing the size of the MPA).
-
During the ORID, the participants expressed that they have really expected all the answers, except for one which is the development of supplemental
livelihood. And according to them, all the strategies are doable.
The awareness and the need to pursue with the Pride campaign lingered around the participants thoughts as they viewed the Rare video and the Pride
campaigns in other countries.
Outcome of the Consensus Workshop:
1. MPA Advocacy
-behavioral change as the end result
-continuous campaign/ education
24
-community mobilization
2. MPA Sufficient Funding
-employ CRM sustainable programs/ activities
-complete things for implementing
-develop supplemental livelihood
3. MPA Law Enforcement
-strengthened law enforcement
-intensify CRM ordinance
-strict implementation of CRM ordinance
-vigilant monitoring of MPA
-additional Bantay Dagat
4. MPA Expansion
-increase MPA area
-MPA expansion
5. Functional Marine Sanctuary Management Council
All attendees of TWG and stakeholder meetings
Further you can include here:
- Outputs from Focus Group Discussions
- Any other relevant qualitative research
Key stakeholders:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Mr. Marion Aragon (DENR / CENRO)
Dr. Leonardo Aro or his representative (BFAR)
Mr. Silorio (Church)
Kimberly de la Cruz (SK Federation / Youth Sector)
Demetrio Larena III (Resort Owner)
25
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Basilica Cuevas (Business Owner)
Fish Vendor representative
Solomon Rendal (MFARMC Representative)
Ms. Virgelia (Barangay Health Worker)
Sergio Cuevas (PO President, Fishermen’s Association, Tandayag)
Jose Anthony (PO President, Fishermen’s Association, Bio-os)
Josephine A. (School Head, Tandayag Elementary School)
Bienvenido Zerna (School Head, Bio-os Elementary School)
Adam Granada (Bantay Dagat, TWG member)
Jolito (Bantay Dagat)
Anton (Bantay Dagat)
Hon. Carlo Angelo Buscato and his 8 Barangay Council members (Tandayag)
Hon. Emelyn Rosales and his 8 Barangay Council members (Bio-os)
Chief Barangay Tanod of Tandayag (to be identified)
Chief Barangay Tanod of Bio-os (to be identified)
2.Concept Model
After the series of workshops and validations with several marine resource management experts, a concept model was developed illustrating the
conservation target, indirect threats and contributing factors of Tandayag and Bio-os Marine Sanctuaries. The model was created using the Miradi
software. Miradi is being developed to assist conservation practitioners in going through the adaptive management process outlined in the
Conservation Measure’s Partnership’s Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation (www.miradi.org). It entails a standardized nomenclature
and threat taxonomy developed by the IUCN.
The following chart is what the Tandayag and Bio-os Marine Sanctuaries concept models look like once all of the direct and contributing factors to
these have been inputted.
The connecting arrows highlight the relationship between the factors and how they impact different targets in Tandayag and Bio-os NTZ.
26
27
3 Threat Analysis, a. Factor Chain
The key conservation components of Tandayag and Bio-os Marine Sanctuaries can be divided into three key “targets” (reef fishes, live corals and
coral reef associated invertebrates). Each of these targets is threatened by a complex of one or more direct threats. Four direct threats were
identified, three of which can be attributed directly to human activities, while one (increase sea water temperature) can be indirect outcomes of
human activities and constitute natural fluctuation of the earth’s lifecycle.
The four threats faced by Tandayag and Bio-os Marine Sanctuaries are:
1. Overfishing (which leads to reduction in reproductive stock, significant reduction in fisheries productivitiy)
2. Entanglement of plastics and other tidal debris in coral reefs
3. Gleaning
4. Coral bleaching (due to increase sea water temperature)
The main driving forces behind these threats are the fact that there are too many fishers in Tandayag and Bio-os as the marine resources are
essentially considered an open access for all. A certain regulation, giving preferential rights to marginal fishers in these two localities, is in already
place. Fishers from other neighboring towns are still allowed to fish provided that they only use hook and line and should secure permit from the
host municipality.
There are a number of factors contributing to a somehow “poor” management of marine resources and enforcement in Tandayag and Bio-os
marine sanctuary regulations. These include lack of involvement of community in MPA related activities and enforcement (passing intelligence
report of intrusions).
28
29
3b Threat Analysis, Threat Ranking
Using the Concept Model created through a series of consultations with the marine resource management experts, local resource users and the
MENRO of Amlan, the direct threats were ranked in Miradi Software. These threats were also identified during the consultations.
This ranking serves to:
1) Identify the highest rank “target” (coral reef and associated macro-invertebrates)
2) Identify the highest rank “threat” that impact this target (overfishing and gleaning)
Scope, Severity and Irreversibility
Each threat is ranked by Scope, Severity and Irreversibility against each target using the following scoring guide:
A. Scope (Area)




Very high: The threat is likely to be pervasive in its scope, affecting the conservation target across all or most (71%-100%) of its occurrence/population.
High: The threat is likely to be widespread in its scope, affecting the conservation target across much (31%-70%) of its occurrence/population.
Medium: The threat is likely to be restricted in its scope, affecting the conservation target across some (11%-30%) of its occurrence/population.
Low: The threat is likely to be very narrow in its scope, affecting the conservation target across a small proportion (1%-10%) of its occurrence/population.
B. Severity




Very high: Within the scope, the threat is likely to destroy or eliminate the conservation target, or reduce its population by 71%-100% within ten years or three
generations.
High: Within the scope, the threat is likely to seriously degrade/reduce the conservation target, or reduce its population by 31%-70% within ten years or three
generations.
Medium: Within the scope, the threat is likely to moderately degrade/ reduce the conservation target, or reduce its population by 11%-30% within ten years or
three generations.
Low: Within the scope, the threat is likely to only slightly degrade/reduce the conservation target, or reduce its population by 1%-10% within ten years or three
generations.
C. Irreversibility (Permanence)

Very high: The effects of the threat cannot be reversed and it is very unlikely the conservation target can be restored, and/or it would take more than 100 years
to achieve this (e.g., wetlands converted to a shopping center or a species going extinct).
30



High: The effects of the threat can technically be reversed and the conservation target restored, but it is not practically affordable and/or it would take 21-100
years to achieve this (e.g., wetland converted to agriculture).
Medium: The effects of the threat can be reversed and the conservation target restored with a reasonable commitment of resources and/or within 6-20 years
(e.g., ditching and draining of wetland).
Low: The effects of the threat are easily reversible and the conservation target can be easily restored at a relatively low cost and/or within 0-5 years (e.g., offroad vehicles trespassing in wetland).
Miradi software automatically captures the targets from the Concept Model showing it along the “X” axis with the direct threats aligned on the “Y”
axis. The following is the threat ranking for the direct threats and conservation target identified for Tandayag and Bio-os Marine Sanctuaries. As
shown in the Threat ranking Table, the summary target rating overfishing ranked very high, followed by coral bleaching, and gleaning.
Entanglement of plastic and other tidal debris ranked the lowest. Reef fishes and live corals are equally affected by overfishing.
31
Threat Ratings
32
4. Results Chain
The campaign’s proposed approach can be represented as four results chain, one for each audience to be targeted. Include a copy of your result
chains, one for each TA, and briefly explain the desired behavior change for each. (Reference p 51 Serena, p 43 Lola)
33
34
The basis for building the above results chains was the concept model illustrated in section B2 as well as the threat ranking and factor chains
included that were subsequently developed in consultation with partners and stakeholders ( see Appendix H7 and H8). The threat ranking helped
identify the priority threat to be addressed by the campaign, based on scope, severity and irreversibility of the threat at the site. The factor chains
subsequently served to illustrate the causal sequence of factors that lie behind the primary threat and the target groups that the campaign needs
to reach to address the threat. The result chains illustrate the results required to achieve the campaign’s desired goals and aim to constitute a road
map for changes the campaign would like to bring about for each target audience. The result chains were also used as a foundation for developing
the campaign quantitative survey and obtaining the information1 that would be required to design effective social marketing and behavior change
interventions for the campaign.
35
5. Establishing a Baseline: Quantitative survey
After conducting qualitative research the Environment and Natural Resources Division-Office of the Governor in partnership with the Local
Government Unit of Amlan conducted a quantitative survey of adults living in Tandayag and Bio-os. This pre-campaign survey was conducted in
February and March 2011 to gain a better understanding of the knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of the target audiences in relation to the
MPA and desired behavior changes as well as to establish a baseline for measuring the impact of the campaign on these audiences through the
campaign. The results from the KAP survey are the basis for the creation of SMART objectives relating to the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice
(KAP) components of the campaign’s Theory-of-Change (ToC).
A second post campaign survey will be conducted at the end of one year of the campaign activities being implemented in May 2009 to measure any
change in these KAP variables in order to assess the level of attainment of the SMART objectives. A full description of the results can be found in
the Project Plan Appendix F4.
The following table summarizes the number of people interviewed and the geographical distribution of the survey.
Geographic scope of survey
Define geographic scope of survey and include a map showing area surveyed
Survey target audiences and sample size
A. Define geographic scope of survey and include a map showing area included in survey
 map of Tandayag with streets
 Map of Bio-os
 Amlan LGU building location
Also include:


flagship sp pictures
map of MPA (not showing NTZ)
36



map of area adjacent to NTZ
questionnaire final word version in Cebuano
answer sheet
B. Sample size calculation
N of people
TA 1.A (Fishers, Tandayag -120) BC- Stop intrusion and intelligence collection
(Fishermen and Gleaners)
TA 1.B (Fishers, Bio-os – 70) Stop intrusion and intelligence collection (Fishermen
and Gleaners)
TA 2 (Enforcement Team-55)BC- Full time MPA law enforcement:
25 PO(People’s organization) + 2 Bantay Dagat in Bio-os
3 Bantay Dagat Tandayag (+20 PO not functioning)
2 Menro staff (3rd is part of survey planning)
3 Police officers
BC: make 24/7 enforcement happen
TA 3.A (Tandayag Community- 4,000)
BC- provide information on intrusions
(&Support MPA activities: coastal clean ups, public consultations and events)
TA 3.B (Bio-os Community – 3,000) BC- provide information on intrusions
(&Support MPA activities: coastal clean ups, public consultations and events)
TA 4 (Amlan-236 LGU Employees206, TWG members-30)BC Town members to develop pride of local MPAs by
participating in activities related to the Tandayag and Bio-os MPA and promote the
MPA concept throughout the municipality. For those whose job is related to MPA,
support MPA activities through their work.
Total
Sample size
at
95%CL and
3%CI
---
Sample
size at
95%CL and
5%CI
---
Final
sample size
choice
-
-
70
-
-
55
843
351
351
787
341
341
193
146
146
608
1083
120
37
C. Sampling methodology
TA1 (Fishermen)
TA2 (Enforcement
Team)
TA3 (Community)
N of TA1a in
locality
sample size for TA in locality
N of TA3a
in locality
23
4,000
TA4 (LGU
employees)
Stratified sampling
Geographic scope
of survey
N of
people
in
listed
locality
Barangay
Tandayag
4,000
Barangay Bio-os
3,000
Amlan (LGU only)
TOTAL
236
7,000
Respondent selection
method
sample
size for
TA1b in
locality
90
70
27
160
5
55
-Interview all (see list
of fishermen, annex)
-Interview all (see list of
fishermen, annex)
25 PO (People’s
organization) + 2
Bantay Dagat in Bio-os
3 Bantay Dagat
Tandayag (+20 PO not
functioning)
2 Menro staff (3rd is part
of survey planning)
3 Police officers
N of TA3b
in locality
sample size for TA
in locality
sample size for TA in
locality
351
3,000
341
146
7,000
692
Random:
One person every two households, all
streets, same number of male and
female (if less than 700 houses in
Tandayag and Bio-os then add
remaining people from houses not yet
visited)
Every office,
interview
whoever is there.
Make sure you
get at least 3
people from each
office. Include
everyone from
higher to lower
staff. (Roughly 10
departments so
14 people per
department)
38
Survey planning
Total survey sample size
Time for enumerator to do one survey
1,083
40 mins
N of hrs enumerator works a day
N of surveys one enumerator can do a day
8 hrs
12
N of enumerators available
23
N of surveys done a day by total n of enumerators
N of days needed to do survey
276
4 days
Additional days needed for travel if any
Contingency days
0
2
TOTAL No. of Days Needed
Dates for training of enumerators & final survey testing
Beginning and end date of survey
6 (+2 for enumerator training)
Feb. 16-17
Feb. 21-25
N of people available to do data entry (train 4 from the
enumerators, 1 person on rotation basis)
Beginning date of data entry
1 (on rotation 8 hr a day) – 14 days
112 hr of data entry (9 surveys per
hr)
Feb. 22
Date of completion of data entry
Mar. 14
39
6. Understanding our audience
TA1 - PRIMARY AUDIENCE – FISHERS (data from quantitative and qualitative research conducted for this campaign, see Appendix H4
Fishers of Tandayag and Bio-os are dependent on fishing as their main source of livelihood. Most of them go fishing twice a
What do we know
day 4:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. During lean months, some would look for other sources of income through farming and
about this group?
construction work. Fishers used a traditional method of fishing such as single- and multiple- hook and line, though the latter
is already modified. In Tandayag, only few fishers live nearby MPA, most of them have to walk about half kilometer to their
respective residents. They are using non-motorized boats. The fishers in Bio-os mostly live near the shoreline. Most of
them are using motorized boats.
The knowledge of fishers about the MPA benefits and who to report intrusions to in the NTZ, are relatively high:
Knowledge
-About 76 % of Tandayag fishers and 56% of Bio-os fishers could name at least one benefit of having a NTZ nearby.
-95% of Tandayag fishers and 96% of Bio-os fishers know who to report to if someone has broken the rules and regulations
of Tandayag/Bio-os Marine Sanctuary (Local Police, Bantay Dagat, MENRO or Barangay Captain)
Attitude
About 66% of Tandayag fishers and 56% of Bio-os fishers agree that there are MPA benefits. 49% of Tandayag fishers and
63% of Bio-os fishers agree that Tandayag and Bio-os MPA rules and regulations need to be followed by all people.
-70% of Tandayag fishers said that it is easy for them to report intrusions in theTandayag Marine Sanctuary to the Enforcement Team
Practice
-55% of Tandayag fishers would like to be involved in any Tandayag MPA-related activities
-54% of Bio-os fishers would like to be involved in any Bio-os MPA-related activities
IC
Trusted sources
Media sources
About 73% of Tandayag fishers and 51% of Bio-os fishers said that the Bantay Dagat is very trustworthy or most trustworthy
as source of information. The Barangay Captains in both Tandayag and Bio-os are also very trustworthy or most trustworthy
persons according to 82% of Tandayag fishers and 72% of Bio-os fishers. Approximately 65% and 73% of Tandayag and Bioos fishers said that MENRO is very trustworthy or most trustworthy.
The preferred media sources of Fishers in both Tandayag and Bio-os are classic oldies, with 61% and 76% of responses,
respectively; Local News 61% and 69%; Religious program 52% and 62%.
43% of Tandayag fishers have no particular time in watching TV. 44% of Bio-os fishers don’t watch TV
40
Any other relevant
information
Comments
Preferred TV Station: ABC-CBN (Tandayag fishers=69%, Bio-os fishers=31%)
61% of Tandayag fishers like a lot or like the most the “Budyas Festival” being celebrated in Tandayag every June 29.
Any other comments by others about this TA
TA3 - PRIMARY AUDIENCE – Local Community (data from quantitative and qualitative research conducted for this campaign, see Appendix H4
The communities know the existence of the MPA but don’t bother to participate in any MPA-related activities.
What do we know
about this group?
Knowledge
Attitude
Practice
IC
Trusted sources
Media sources
Any other relevant
information
Comments
Approximately 52% and 30% of Tandayag and Bio-os community respectively, could name at least one benefit of having a
NTZ nearby.
-86% of Tandayag community and 88% of Bio-os community know who to report to if someone has broken the rules and
regulations of Tandayag and Bio-os Marine Sanctuary.
47% of Tandayag and 25% of Bio-os community members believed that there are benefits to them for having a no-take zone
nearby.
25% of Tandayag community and 8% Bio-os community would like to be involved in activities related to their respective
MPAs.
41% and 46% of Tandayag and Bio-os community said that Bantay Dagat is very trustworthy or most trustworthy as the
source of information. About 61% and 57% of Tandayag and Bio-os community said that MENRO is very trustworthy or most
trustworthy source of information. 54% and 77% of the Tandayag and Bio-os community members said that their Barangay
Captains are very trustworthy and most trustworthy.
The MPA Enforcement Team either like a lot or like the most the classic oldies (80%), local news (64%) and religious
program (62%).
Preferred TV station: ABS-CBN (Tandayag community=66%, Bio-os community=30%)
Summarize the most important findings from your quantitative survey in this table
Any other comments by others about this TA
41
TA2 - SECONDARY AUDIENCE – MPA Enforcement Team (data from quantitative and qualitative research conducted for this campaign, see
Appendix H4
The MPA Enforcement Team includes the Bantay Dagat members who are fishers themselves, Police Officer and two
What do we know
MENRO staff. The Bantay Dagat does the guarding, while the rest of the team members would only join during
about this group?
apprehensions.
About 84% of Enforcement Team could name at least one MPA benefit.
Knowledge
Attitude
There was about 85% of the MPA Enforcement Team who believed that there are benefits of having a no-take zone to the
nearby community.
-41% and 37% of MPA Enforcement Team would like to be involved in any Tandayag and Bio-os MPA-related activities
Practice
IC
Trusted sources
Media sources
Any other relevant
information
Comments
85% of MPA Enforcement Team said that Local Government Environment Officials are most or very trustworthy
86% for the Barangay Captain and 80% for the MENRO
Classic oldies: 80%
Local news: 64%
Religious program: 62%
Preferred TV station: ABS-CBN (69%)
Summarize the most important findings from your quantitative survey in this table
Any other comments by others about this TA
TA4 - SECONDARY AUDIENCE – LGU (data from quantitative and qualitative research conducted for this campaign, see Appendix H4
Insert a brief summary of what you know of this target audience based on the qualitative research you have done and any
What do we know
other information you have about their life, habits, values and relation to the MPA.
about this group?
42
Approximately 66% of LGU Employees in Amlan could name at least one MPA benefit.
Knowledge
57% of LGU Employees believed that there are MPA benefits to the nearby community.
Attitude
23% of LGU Employees would like to be involved in any MPA related activities in Tandayag and 21% for Bio-os MPA
Practice
IC
Trusted sources
Media sources
Any other relevant
information
Comments
The following are the most or very trustworthy sources of information, according to the Amlan LGU Employees:
-Friends or Family Members (55% of responses)
-Local Government Environment Officials (53% of responses)
-Scientist (52% of responses)
-MENRO (46% of responses)
Local news: 68%
Religious program: 60%
Concert:52%
Preferred TV station: 52%
Summarize the most important findings from your quantitative survey in this table
Any other comments by others about this TA
43
7. Marketing mix
The marketing mix below provides an outline of the big picture campaign strategy for promoting the desired behavior change to the
campaign target audiences.
The marketing mix is a tool developed in the field of marketing to define and communicate the strategy for selling a product. The marketing mix
identifies 5Ps: what is to be marketed and sold (PRODUCT), how much it will be sold for (PRICE), where it will be sold (PLACE), through what
channels and media it will be advertized (PROMOTION) and what will be the key promotional messages (POSITIONING).
The same tool can be applied in social marketing to achieve behavior change for an outcome that will benefit the community. In this case the
PRODUCT to be sold is the desired behavior change, the PRICE is the cost that the people doing the behavior change may incur in doing so whether financial, in terms of time loss or otherwise, the PLACE is the location where the target audiences will be reached by campaign messages,
PROMOTION identifies the channels and media through which the behavior change will be promoted, and POSITIONING are the key messages
used to promote the desired behavior change.
Marketing Mix for Fishers of Tandayag and Bio-os
Product
Price
Place
Fishermen should stop intruding in Tandayag/Bio-os Marine Sanctuary and report
intrusions to the enforcement team
 Deprived from fishing
 Loss of income expected from fishing inside the MPA
 Deprived feeling of ownership over the open-access sea
 Pride in accepting the blame
 Loss of personal dignity
 Strained relationship between good fishers and intruders



Promotional materials such as billboards will be posted at the marine
sanctuary, at the docking area (place where fishers leave their boats)
and at the corners of the road used as passage ways for fishers; posters
will be placed at the sari-sari stores where most fishers frequently
visit and in places where fishers relax most of the time
Activities will be done both on-site (near or at the MPAs) and off-site
(at the Municipal Gym, Schools where more people could attend and
participate)
Bumper Stickers for Tricycles
44
Promotion
The campaign will use various communication channels both impersonal and
interpersonal. Radio will be used as one channel as this is the most preferred
media by fishers. Fishers like to hear news while preparing to fish and during
relaxation after the fishing activity. Campaign jingles and messages will then be
played as radio spots/ plugs. Some posters and billboards will be used. Other
materials such as T-Shirts and caps for fishers and umbrellas for their wives will be
used. Mini media will also be used such as pin buttons and bumper stickers.
Considering the fishers stage of behavior (preparation), high in knowledge and
attitude and low IC, the campaign will focus more on activities that would increase
IC such as community or cluster meetings and workshops (where their views and
opinions will be heard), coastal clean-ups, fiestas and other group gatherings.
The Barangay Captain, MENRO and TWG Chairperson are the most trusted sources
of information, thus they will be invited to talk during meetings.
Social network such as Facebook will also be used since computers and free
internet access are being offered by the municipality for the community to view
photos and updates of the campaign.
Positioning
-The campaign will focus on increasing the tourism potential of Tandayag/ Bio-os
Marine Sanctuary and preparing/ saving for the next generation
Three options:
1) “If I fish only at the designated area, fish and the corals will continue to grow
and reproduce thus becoming more attractive to tourists.”
2) “If I fish outside the marine sanctuary, then I will become a good parent by
securing more fish for my children ….(thinking to secure the future for my
children.”)
45
Marketing Mix for Community in Tandayag and Bio-os
Product
Price
Place
Report intrusion and participate in MPA-related activities
 Strained relationship due to reporting intruders (persons who could be
their own friends or family members)
 Time spent doing their personal thing
 Risk of possible retaliation from violators

Campaign billboards and posters will be set up at the marine sanctuary
at the sari-sari stores in Tandayag and Bio-os, Municipal Hall and the
Market place
Promotion
-Print media such as posters, billboards and calendars
-Streamers will be hang at major streets during fiestas and will be shown during
street parades
-Folding fans and pin buttons will be given away
Positioning
-The campaign will focus on increasing the tourism potential of Tandayag/ Bio-os
marine sanctuary by reporting intrusions and participating in MPA-related
activities
1) “I will make my place famous by reporting intrusions thus allowing corals and
fish to grow and reproduce inside the sanctuary which attract more tourists.”
2) “I will enjoy aesthetic value of marine sanctuary if I will report intrusions and
participate in coastal clean-up thus making the reefs clean and allowing corals
and fishes to grow and reproduce”
46
6. Creative Brief
Creative Brief is a strategic document that serves as the creative team’s guide for writing and producing campaign materials. The Creative
Brief describes the most important issues that should be considered in the development of the materials, including a definition and description
of the target audience or audiences; the rational and emotional appeals/benefits to be highlighted; and the style, approach, or tone you want
for the materials.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
All the important findings from qualitative and quantitative research should really come together in the creative brief so that it may:
Provide direction and guidance to those developing materials (i.e. vendors)
Ensure that messages are perceived by target audiences as relevant and “personally” tailored
Ensure that materials are in line with the campaign’s strategic objectives
Ensure clarity and uniformity of material design (especially when multiple vendors are designing materials)
Provide a separate creative brief for each key target audience for campaign.
Creative Brief for Fishers
Problem
Statement
Amlan is a coastal municipality that forms part of Tañon Strait, the home
for many species of whales and dolphins. It has two marine protected
areas located in Tandayag and Bio-os. Despite the years when these two
MPAs were established, low fish catch is still a prevailing problem by many
fishers in these two barangays.
Based on the KAP survey results, 24% of fishers said that their catch is still
the same, 5.7% said their catch is declining, and 14.9% said increasing. In
the Focus Group Discussion, the fishers disclosed that their catch is only 0.5
to 3 kilograms, and sometimes zero for reef fishes. Fishers also shared that
there are times though when their catch would reach as high as 7
kilograms for the pelagic species only (during its season), but not for reef
fishes. This is because the MPA did not reach its full potential to recover
due to stress from various sources, including man-made. Stress from
intrusions is one.
There are still fishers who intrude into the Tandayag / Bio-os marine
sanctuary. The goal of this Rare Pride campaign is ensuring buy-in in MPA
management by fishers. Fishers should take Pride in having their MPA.
Target Audience

Fishing is the primary source of livelihood
47
Profile
Desired Action
Barriers to Action
Farming is the alternate source during lean months (November to
February) however, this also becomes a problem due to prolonged
dry or wet season which is not good for rootcrops they are planting
 Tandayag: High literacy 25% high school level, 20% completed
elementary, 20% complete high school
 Bio-os: High literacy 32% complete elementary, 24% high school level,
21% complete elementary education
 Tandayag: Fishers (97%male, 5% female)16.7% are at age 40-44, the
same percentage 16.7% are 55or older years old
 Bio-os: Fishers (95% male, 5% female)
 High level of knowledge and attitude on the benefits of the MPA, but
low IC
 Barangay Captain, MENRO and Church leaders are the most trusted
sources of information
 Behavior change continuum- Preparation stage
Stop intruding in the MPA and report intrusions to the enforcement team

Barriers for stopping intrusion:
-Lesser catch outside the MPA
-Loss of income expected from fishing inside the MPA
-Deprived feeling of ownership over the open-access sea
-No promising alternative livelihood
Barriers for reporting intrusions:
-fear of having a strained relationship (between him, who is a good fisher
and his friend- the intruder)
-No cellphones
-Distance of residence from the MPA location (Some fishers are residing in
areas far from where the MPA is located)
Benefit Exchange
Messaging
Strategy
Ecological Benefit
-healthy corals, bigger and abundant fish
Emotional Benefit Much stronger. Good work.
-sense of Pride of becoming a good and responsible parent
-sense of belongingness of becoming a member of the intelligence
network
-free from guilt-feeling (fishing inside while others are not)
“If I fish outside the marine sanctuary, I will become a good and
responsible parent securing fish for my children’s future.”
48
“If I report intrusions I will have a strong feeling of belongingness in the
MPA intelligence network”
Support






Image
Specific Sections in the MPA Ordinance stipulating the prohibition in
fishing inside the MPA and its equivalent penalties
Scientists say that one sq. kilometer of healthy reefs could give 20-30
tons of fish per year
Data comparing fish inside and outside of MPA
ID of enforcement Team as deputized to enforce MPA rules and
regulations
The Mayor has a strong position towards improving enforcement
Your last brief had “community leaders and peers support the
initiative” which is a very nice support point if it’s true.
Fishing outside the MPA, delineated with marker buoys






Openings
Responsible act
Urgent act
Easy to do
Simple action that you can do very easily, without spending
money
A good fisher (parent) fishing outside the Marine Protected Area
Or an image of a fisher illustrating this concept: if you will still
continue to intrude, your peer might start questioning your
practices and you will not gain respect (peer pressure)
FISHERS
 When they are preparing to fish early in the morning
 When they are carrying the boat to the sea
 When they are hanging out with peers relaxing
 When they are buying a drink to a local sari-sari store
 When they are at the gasoline station buying gasoline needed to
for fishing in deep sea
 When they are visiting a supplier of fishing paraphernalia
 When they are attending a community meeting or church
 When talking to someone they trust: Barangay Captain, MENRO,
Church Leaders, their spouse, or a friend about this issue
49
Mandatories
Campaign
Materials/
Activities
Include image of a fisherman in a boat (fishing outside the MPA
delineated with market buoys)
 Include logo of: Provincial Government, Municipality of Amlan,
Rare, Pride campaign logo
 Must give credit to the organizations that financed the posters by
including their logos at the bottom of the poster
 Must include Cohort campaign theme, Rare logo
 Contact information: MENRO
Billboards, Posters, T-Shirts, Caps, Umbrellas, Bumper stickers, Mascot,
Radio plugs, campaign jingle/ song, cellphone cover (cloth), Sermon
Sheets, Christmas Party with Kids, Parents with the Mascot, Mascot visiting
schools, Field trip for fisher representatives



Promotional materials such as billboards will be posted at the
marine sanctuary, at the docking area (place where fishers leave
their boats) and at the corners of the road used as passage ways for
fishers; posters will be placed at the sari-sari stores where most
fishers frequently visit and in places where fishers relax most of the
time
Mini Media will be distributed as prizes to games during campaign
activities
50
Creative Brief for Community
Problem
Statement
Amlan is a coastal municipality that forms part of Tañon Strait, the home
for many species of whales and dolphins. It has two marine protected
areas located in Tandayag and Bio-os. Despite the years when these two
MPAs were established, the community doesn’t seem to care about
these. The community heard of intrusions, but didn’t take the initiative of
reporting them. Guarding the MPA 24/7 is a difficult task for the
enforcement team which makes community participation critical.
Target Audience
Profile
Community is composed of professionals, store owners, vendors
High level on knowledge and attitude on the benefits of the MPA, but
low in Interpersonal Communication (IC)
 Barangay Captain and MENRO as the most trusted sources
 Behavior change continuum- Preparation stage
 Level of Education: 19% (Tandayag) 20% (Bio-os) completed high
school; 18% (Tandayag)16% (Bio-os) high school level; 13% (Tandayag)
24% (Bio-os) completed elementary
 Religion: 93% Catholic
 Income: 24% (Tandayag) and 17% (Bio-os) below P30,000 household
income per annum 19% (Tandayag) and 5% (Bio-os) between P30,000P50,000; 31% (Tandayag) and 68% (Bio-os) not sure
 Employment: 30% (Tandayag) and 39% (Bio-os) do housework; 15%
(Tandayag) and 13% (Bio-os) are shop keepers; 12% (Tandayag) 10%
(Bio-os) not currently employed
Report intrusions to the enforcement team
Barriers for reporting intrusions:
-Apathy towards health of corals in the MPA
-Apathy to fishers
-Fear of possible retaliation from violators
-No cellphones
-Distance of residence from the MPA (some community members are
residing in areas far from where the MPA is located)
-Community members are mostly working, so no time to go hang around
in the sea
Desired Action
Barriers to Action
Much better!
Benefit Exchange


Ecological Benefit
-healthy corals and bigger and abundant fish
51
Emotional Benefit
-Feeling free from the burden of guilt of being apathetic to fishers
-Feeling sense of importance and belongingness (their report or opinion
are being heard by the Enforcement Team, ManComm particularly from
the Barangay Captain and the Mayor)
-sense of Pride thinking that they are part in protecting the MPA
-Feeling of courageous, not afraid of retaliation from intruders
Messaging
Strategy
“I will report intrusion because I am a good resident of Amlan who is
concerned about the health of the MPA, which is the top priority program
of the Municipality”
“If I will report intrusion and participate in MPA-related activities, I will
develop a strong sense of belongingness in Amlan and my voice will be
heard by the Enforcement Team”
“I will report intrusion because I care for the future of our fishers’ children”
Support
-MPA is legally established through a Municipal Ordinance, thus it is illegal
to fish inside
-Scientists say that one sq. kilometer of healthy reefs could give 20-30 tons
of fish per year
-PCRA results reveal that the average fish a catch of fisher per day is 1.5
kg.
-Data comparing fish inside and outside of MPA
Image






Openings
Community reporting intrusion
An image of the community participating in MPA meetings/
activities
Responsible act
Urgent act
Easy to do
Simple action that you can do very easily, without spending
money

Community
 When they are at the store buying something
52






Mandatories





Campaign
Materials
When they are in a picnic at the sea
When they are attending Sunday mass
When they are the municipal hall
When they are buying fish at the market
When they are attending a community meeting
When talking to someone they trust: Barangay Captain, MENRO,
Church Leaders, their spouse, or a friend about this issue
Include image of a healthy coral reefs with lots of large fish
species (highlight flagship species, e.g. red grouper)
Include logo of: Provincial Government, Municipality of Amlan,
Rare and Cohort Sustainable Fishing in the Philippines
Must give credit to the organizations that financed the posters by
including their logos at the bottom of the poster
Must include Cohort campaign theme, Rare logo
Contact information: MENRO
Posters, Billboards, T-Shirts, Caps, Bumper stickers, Sermon during Sundays,
Radio Plugs, Mascot visiting the children, parents and teachers in schools,
Street Parades, Town Fiesta, Festivals (Budyas Festival for Tandayag
residents)
53
C. MPA Governance and Management plan
(BROP)
1. Abstract
Marine Protected Areas are suggested as the most effective tool in fisheries management. They serve as safe haven for fish, invertebrates, and corals to breed, grow and
consequently to improve fish biomass, abundance, diversity, and coral reef habitats. The Marine Protected Area or Marine Sanctuary of Tandayag was established in 1996 through
the Municipal Ordinance No. 02, Series of 1996 and Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in 1999 through Municipal Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1999. These ordinances describe the rules
and regulations in the no- take zone, the penalties per violation, definition of boundaries, and a management body designated to oversee and perform the daily activities. The
management tasks were performed based on this ordinance and the CRM plan, the section of which describes the major strategies and activities.
Apparently, over the years the management performance for Tandayag and Bio-os were both rated Level 2 [Established], based on the MPA Effectiveness Rating. The
management body [Technical Working Group (TWG) and Management Committee (ManCom)] acknowledged these ratings during the organizational development workshops.
The results of the rating could be attributed to lack of enforcement plan and lack of annual participatory biophysical monitoring. Furthermore, intrusions could still be observed
within the no-take zone. During the MPA management effectiveness rating, it was also found out that the performance monitoring was not conducted regularly and there was also
no socio-economic monitoring and feedback mechanism that would encourage the community to support the MPA (knowing that there is really increase income by fishers). This
consequently resulted to intrusions by some local fishers from within the village and from neighboring municipalities. This issue also came out during the PCRA.
The results of the KAP survey revealed that only 52% (Tandayag) and 30% (Bio-os) community members are aware of the benefits of the NTZ. In terms of biophysical status, the
Tandayag MPA had 24% live hard coral cover and was predominated by 42% sand, based on the PCRA conducted in 2007. The Bio-os MPA had 45% live hard coral cover and
4% dead coral. Fish communities in Tandayag and Bio-os MPAs were predominated by small-sized Pomacentrids with an average of 26 individuals/500m2 and 283
individuals/500 m2, respectively. Target species such as Surgeonfishes and goatfishes were also observed. This can be explained by extractive fishing practices inside the NTZ
such as fish traps and net fishing. The lack of community buy-in and enforcement are the main issues pressing the NTZ at the moment.
In Tandayag and Bio-os NTZ, poor governance and poor implementation of enforcement continuum calls for improvement in the management through the sound strategies
within the protected area taking into account community participation in the process. The diagnostic processes [PCRA, MPA rating, OD] were vital in identifying the issues
mentioned earlier. Hence, the results from these methods were used as bases in crafting this MPA Governance and Management Plan to improve governance, enforcement and
community buy-in. This MPA-GMP will be carried out by the MPA Management Body [TWG and ManCom] within the timeframe of June 2011-June 2012 and will be assessed
regularly during MPA management meetings. The implementation of this MPA-GMP will be supported through funds of LGU-Amlan and the provincial government through the
Environment and Natural Resources Division (ENRD) – Office of the Governor, Rare and other possible sources such as the DA-BFAR, other Line
Agencies, NGOs and Small Grants from local organizations.
54
2. Introduction
The Philippines ranked first with the most number of MPAs in the world. About 25% of the worlds MPAs are found in the Philippines. However,
15% of these MPAs are doomed to fail in an annual basis due to poor governance and weak enforcement (Aliňo 1998). In fact, during the Rareinitiated workshop in Cebu, on February 2010, these two major concerns surfaced as the most pressing issues compared to pollution, sedimentation,
land-use, and climate change. The said workshop was attended by scholars and experts in their fields in the Philippines.
In this plan, Governance refers to the clarity of processes in choosing leaders to manage the MPA and Enforcement [a subset of governance] refers
to the capacity and availability of logistics to perform the roles that involves the entire continuum such as deterrence, apprehension, case filing and
decision. The poor selection of leaders and weak capacity to enforce MPA boundaries and policies will result to: a) the lack of community buy-in to
support the leaders and projects; b) unregulated unsustainable fishing activities inside MPAs, and; c) unpopular MPA boundaries and ownership.
Subsequently, MPA benefits are not maximized and the community loss the PRIDE over the local MPA.
Rare Pride Campaign is geared towards a greater community buy-in for an improved MPA governance and enforcement. Community buy-in refers
to the active involvement of locale in critical projects after having clearly understood their roles and functions for such projects and their long-term
benefits. This may involve the process of behaviour change and maintenance of good practices.
A combination of locally- practiced tools such as PCRA, management meetings, organizational development workshops plus KAP survey have been
employed during the period of November 2010 until May 2011 to gain community support right up at front. This period is only the diagnostic phase
of the campaign, but right at start community involvement is already being sought for buy-in. Eventually, as we move forward to the planning and
implementation phase, the local community will not only have a better appreciation of the entire process, but would also gain ownership and
PRIDE of the MPA benefits.
As more and more people from various sectors are getting involved with clear roles and functions for MPA management, coupled with the
elements of time to embed such practices, threats to the MPA will be reduced and protection of biodiversity will be enhanced. This will also ensure
continued benefits of protected areas, establishment of buffer zones and zoning of the protected area to sustain productivity and building value of
the resources. In this way, the concern of the local community will be enhanced towards ownership and taking PRIDE of their MPA.
3. Objectives and scope
1. To improve MPA enforcement processes by November 2011 [i.e. upgraded guardhouse, enforcement, protocols/plans, intelligence
network and communication, logbook system]
55
2. To improve MPA governance system by November 2011 [i.e. regular meeting, increase membership, documentation, management
planning, evaluation, monitoring team]
3. Improve MPA effectiveness rating to level 3 [enforced] by June 2012
4. Tools
Tools employed included Participatory Coastal Resource Assessment (PCRA) tools; an MPA effectiveness rating workshop and a Technical Working
Group (TWG) and Management Committee (ManCom) Organizational Development ( OD) and planning workshops
5. MPA profile
MPA history, resource use and enforcement
Include a digitized resource map, outputs from FGD on enforcement and MPA history. Discuss any results of other PCRA tools-if necessary and
reference the H9 “fisheries profile” where all results from the PCRA are summarized.
56
57
FGD on enforcement
Over 15 years now, the Tandayag NTZ has accounted to approximately 65 violations based on sightings and testimonies by fisherfolks and
other community members within the village. As presented in Table 1.a, most of the intrusions happened four to seven years after the
establishment of NTZ where a big issue on political intervention in enforcement surface out and dampened the enthusiasm of most marginal
fishers and Fishermen Association members. Such intrusions include the use of compressor fishing, fish nets and hook and line by fishers
coming from neighboring towns and barangays. However, the validity and further details of information on the number and provenance of
intruders and the time of day or occasion when such incidents took place could not be verified as there is no logbook at the village level. Police
blotter on MPA intrusions is also not sufficient to confirm all the information since not all incidents (e.g. gleaning, bathing in the MPA) reached
up to municipal level. In additional, the lack of enforcement logistics, support and intelligence and the lack of capacity to practice the whole
enforcement continuum aggravate the entire enforcement and governance process.
Since the establishment in 1999, the Bio-os NTZ has an estimated intrusions of 27 (Table 1.b). From 15 intrusions a year after the
establishment, it went down to 4 and then zero for this year. Most of the intrusions were done by fishers from neighboring towns using hook
and line and fish nets. Three fishers who used to be intruders into the NTZ are now members of the Fishermen’s Association of Bio-os and are
now helping the Bantay Dagat in the enforcement. These fishers, together with the rest of the association members do the surveillance and
patrolling as scheduled and also during their fishing hours.
MPA effectiveness rating and analysis
Based on the recently held MPA management rating workshop, both the Tandayag (Table 4.a.) and Bio-os (Table 4.b.) MPAs are rated Level 2,
meaning Established. Despite the number of years since Tandayag and Bio-os NTZ have been established.
Table 4.a. highlights the management focus, relevant indicators and the actual score of Tandyag MPA management. This further detail the
management items that needs improvement and guide the management team to achieve the desired level for this campaign which is Level 3.
As showed in this table, the three top priorities that need attention are: 1) monitoring and evaluation, with only 22.2%; 2) IEC, with the score of
50%, and 3) enforcement, with 52.6% score. Setting up mechanisms for the annual conduct of participatory biophysical monitoring and
evaluation of the MPA, for the improvement in the implementation of soft and hard enforcement, including the enhancement of intelligence
system and coordination is also recognized as critical indicators in achieving Level 3 rating. Deterrence such as marker buoys to delineate
boundaries, upgrading of guardhouse is also being considered as critical to achieving the desired rating.
58
Tandayag MPA
Management Focus
Management Plan
Management Body
Legal Instrument and support
Community Participation
Financing
IEC
Enforcement
Monitoring and evaluation
Maintenance of infrastructure and site
development
Relevant indicators
4, [10], 27, 38, [39]
5, [11], 20, 29,[32], 40
6, [9], 37, 41
[1], [3], 8
[12], 19, 28, 35, 49
7, 14,[ 23], [44], 45,[46]
[13], 15, [21], [25], [26], [30], [36]
2, 18, 24, 33, 34, 42, [43]
Total Available Actual Score per
points
Management Focus
9
9
10
7
6
6
7
7
7
5
12
6
19
10
9
2
16, 17, 22, 31, 47, 48
6
4
Actual Score divided by
Total Available Points
100.0%
70.0%
100.0%
100.0%
71.4%
50.0%
52.6%
22.2%
66.7%
Bio-os MPA
Management Focus
Management Plan
Management Body
Legal Instrument and support
Community Participation
Financing
IEC
Enforcement
Monitoring and evaluation
Relevant indicators
4, [10], 27, 38, [39]
5, [11], 20, 29,[32], 40
6, [9], 37, 41
[1], [3], 8
[12], 19, 28, 35, 49
7, 14,[ 23], [44], 45,[46]
[13], 15, [21], [25], [26], [30], [36]
2, 18, 24, 33, 34, 42, [43]
Total
Available
points
9
10
6
7
7
12
19
9
Actual Score per
Management
Focus
9
7
6
7
5
9
10
2
Actual Score divided
by Total Available
Points
100.0%
70.0%
100.0%
100.0%
71.4%
75.0%
52.6%
22.2%
59
Maintenance of infrastructure and site
development
16, 17, 22, 31, 47, 48
6
4
66.7%
Threats and management challenges of the MPA
Provide a brief summary of threats and management challenges to the MPA
TWG

Discuss your TWG and process of forming reconstituting it for the campaign[Specify departments and or supervisors who have
critical roles]
1. TWG
a. TWG Formation
The formation of the technical working for Rare Pride Campaign went through the following process: (a) identification of persons to be invited in
the project orientation, (b) series of meetings where roles and responsibilities were clearly discussed/ defined, (c) drafting of Executive Order, (d)
review and finalization of membership and roles and responsibilities, (e) signing of the Executive Order by the Municipal Mayor, and (f)
presentation of the EO to TWG members.
Among the members of the TWG, the MENRO has the major role since the management of the coastal resources is mandated in this office as
stipulated in Article IX, Section 54 (Functions, Duties and Powers of the MENRO) of Municipal Ordinance No.03, S.2007.
b. Vision, Mission, Goals
Vision
An improved quality of life of Amlanganons with an increased level of awareness and commitment through sustainable development and
management of coastal and marine resources (Amlan CRM plan 2008-2012).
Mission
60
To strengthen community involvement for the protection, conservation and development of MPAs with a higher level of awareness, commitment
and sense of ownership through RARE PRIDE CAMPAIGN.
Table xxx. TWG Composition
Name
Hon. Jonathan Kitane
Position and Office
SB Chair on Agriculture and Fisheries;
Chairperson, Rare Pride Campaign-TWG
Contact
0.35.417.0694 loc. 105
Roles/Responsibilities
Legislation, Lobby SB for approval of plans and
budget for MPAs
Hon. Melvyn Reynado
0.35.417.0694 loc. 105
Hon. Analinda Esparcia
SB Chair on Environment; Co-Chair for Rare
Pride Campaign-TWG
SB Chair on Tourism
Hon. Edmund Tubac
SB Chair on Peace and Order
Job D. Tagle
Head- Municipal Environment and Natural
Resources Office
Head, Municipal Planning and Development
Office
Barangay Captain, Tandayag
0.35.417.0694 loc. 114
0917.314.3299
0.35.417.0694 loc. 102
Legislation, Lobby SB for approval of plans and
budget for MPAs
Legislation, Lobby SB for approval of plans and
budget for MPAs
Legislation, Lobby SB for approval of plans and
budget for MPAs
Plan implementation, Budget Allocation for
MPAs
Planning and Budgeting
0915.826.0832
Budget Allocation for Bantay Dagat Honoraria
Barangay Captain, Bios
c/o SB Tel. No. 0.35.417.0694
loc.105
c/o MENRO Tel. No.
0.35.417.0694 loc.114
c/o MENRO Tel. No.
0.35.417.0694 loc.114
c/o MENRO Tel. No.
0.35.417.0694 loc.114
Budget Allocation for Bantay Dagat Honoraria
Geoffrey Silorio
Hon. Carlo Angelo
Buscato
Hon. Emelyn Rosales
SPO2 Miguel Yaeso
Adam Granada
Police Environmental Desk Officer (PEDO),
PNP
Bantay Dagat Member
Antonieto Suelto
Bantay Dagat Member
0.35.417.0694 loc. 105
0917.314.1841
0.35.417.0694 loc. 105
MPA Enforcement
Ensures enforcement of Tandayag MPA
Ensures enforcement of Tandayag MPA
2. ManCom
The management of the two marine sanctuaries (Tandayag and Bio-os) is under the municipal government, in coordination with the concerned
Barangay, MFARMC and concerned organizations as specified in Article III, Section 17 of Municipal Ordinance No. 03, “A Comprehensive Municipal
Ordinance for the Sustainable Development, Management, Conservation and Protection of the Municipal Waters and its Coastal and Fishery
Resources, Harmonizing and Integrating All Ordinances Pertinent thereto and for other purposes.”
61
Name
Bentham P. De la Cruz
Office and Position
Municipal Mayor
Contact
0.35.417.0694 loc. 101
Hon. Carlo Angelo
Buscato
Hon. Emelyn Rosales
Barangay Captain, Tandayag
0915.826.0832
Barangay Captain, Bios
Job D. Tagle
Head- Municipal Environment and
Natural Resources Office
c/o SB Tel. No.
0.35.417.0694 loc.105
0.35.417.0694 loc. 114
0917.314.3299
Responsibilities
Ensures project implementation, Issuance of Executive Order, Approval
of the Municipal Budget for MPA management
Budget Allocation for Bantay Dagat Honoraria
Budget Allocation for Bantay Dagat Honoraria
Plan implementation, Budget Allocation for MPAs
3. Threats and management challenges of the MPA
Among the challenges in the hard enforcement are commercial fishing operation within the municipal waters and the lack of members in the
enforcement team to perform the 24/7 guarding system (Table 5). MPA enforcement is often intertwined with enforcement in the whole stretch
of municipal waters which even makes the whole system even more challenging. It is often thought by community members that if commercial
fishers within municipal waters are not stopped, then there is no way for the marginal fishers to adhere on the MPA rules and regulations.
Table 5: List of threats and challenges of the MPA
Hard enforcement
1. Commercial fishing operation inside
Municipal waters
2. Lack of enforcement team / Bantay Dagat
Soft enforcement
1. Lack maintenance plan for marker buoys
2. Lack maintenance plan for guardhouse
and pumpboat
3. Absence of bulletin board and marker
4. Lack of communication facilities–
handheld radio / cell phone
Management Body
1. Attendance during meetings
Feasibility and Impact
62
This action plan underwent expert validation and approval process. The planning-workshop was facilitated by an external auditor, Rodolfo
Santos, Ph.D. He has a long history of organizational development in the Philippines in the field of facilitation in organizations of various
levels and scale in the Philippines, following a diverse business model. The tool used in planning i.e. MPA Effectiveness Rating is a standard
tool in the Philippines to assess management performance of MPAs which was published by White et al. 2001. This was enhanced by
EcoGov Philippines and UP-MSI [MEAT]. The action plans were the outputs of the 2-day workshop participated in by the TWG, ManComm
local fishers, enforcers, and LGU Departments Heads who are considered experts in their localities thereby producing a ground truth
strategies and activities. Since action plans will be integrated in the Project Plan where LAP/LCE endorsements are affixed, the same
signature will suffice for the approval. These plans will be further validated back to the community after a series of iterations during
Module 3, to serve as the road map in achieving Level 3 management status rating by June 2012.
63
6. Action Plan
Table xxx. Tandayag MPA
Strategic Priorities
Objectives
Measures
VMG: IEC on VMG
To increase level of awareness of
community on the VMG for CRM
and Rare Pride Campaign of the
municipality
Community involvement in MPA
activities
Operations:
Involvement of
guardhouse &
Facilities
To improve monitoring of MPA
-Newly constructed guardhouse
and communication equipment
Activities
a. Advertisements through
tarpaulins, billboards and
other campaign materials
b. Conduct IEC in schools
c. Info. Campaigns through
purok/ barangay assemblies
a. Construction of guardhouse
and fixtures
Amount
Needed
Timeline
Lead Person
P50,000
JuneAugust
2011
TWG
P50,000
July 2011
Barangay
Official,
MENRO, Bantay
Dagat
March
2011
LGU, Barangay
Officials
May 2011
MENRO &
TWG
April 2011
TWG
April-May
2011
TWG
-MPA could be seen from the
guardhouse
-Acquired Road Right of Way with
legal documents
To acquire Road Right of Way and
docking areas
b. Follow-up negotiations and
procurement with lot owners
Accessibility
Governance:
Capability Building
To enhance the leadership skills of
MPA management council
Finance: Fund
Sourcing
To have sufficient funds to run the
MPA management program
Networking:
Establish and
improve linkages
To gather more support from POs,
NGOs, NGAs and other agencies,
Amlan Resort Owners Association,
Independent MPA management
council, capability of the
management council to hold
meetings
Attendance of meetings
a. Seminars/ Trainings/
Workshops
a. Lobby with the SB to
increase the budget
b. Pass proposal to funding
agencies
a. To invite participants to the
meetings
P15,000
P2,000
Involvement in the program/
64
Oil depot
activities
b. Conduct meetings
Rare Pride campaign
incorporated in POs program
c. Publish in LGU website and
other social networking site
(www.facebook)
Table xxx. Bio-os MPA
Strategic Priorities
Objectives
Consultative meeting with
stakeholders and promotion
of Rare Pride Campaign
To increase awareness and
promote social acceptability
of the MPA
Increase capability of law
enforcement on CRM
To strengthen enforcement of
Bantay Dagat on CRM
(Monitoring and Evaluation)
MPA management
To capacitate MPA
management bodies
Funds
To lobby funding support
worldwide
To partner with NGOs, POs,
NGAs
Establish linkages
Measures
Community participation in
MPA activities
24/7 enforcement of MPA by
Bantay Dagat
MPA management meetings
held, minutes recorded, MPA
issues and concerns discussed
Established networking
Activities
Amount
Needed
Timeline
a. Conduct survey or
inventory of resources
b. Feedback
information to the
community
c. IEC at the
community level
a. Construction of
guardhouse
P50,000
(counterpart
scheme)
MarchApril 2011
Job Tagle,
Hon. Kitane
P50,000
April-May
2011
Job Tagle,
Hon. Kitane
b. Purchase of
communication
equipment
c. Purchase of diving
gears
P30,000
March-Dec.
a. Capability building
b. Trainings/ Seminars
P20,000
March
2011
P10,000
MarchApril 2011
a. Fund raising
(concert, etc.)
a. Singing of MOA
with NGOs, POs, NGAs
Lead Persons
P100,000
Local Chief
Executive, Job
T., J.Kitane
65
Critical Areas
Relevant
indicator
Smart objectives
Specific activity
Person responsible
Timeframe
To establish the structure and
processes for the formulation
of the next CRM plan
1. Formulation of BROP
MENRO, CF
May 2011
2. PCRA for validation (public
consultation)
PCRA team
May 2011
3. Review of previous CRM plan (MPA
related components only), SWOT and
discussion
TWG, MFARMC
July 2012
100000
To establish regular (yearly)
monitoring & evaluation of
performance
1. Management effectiveness rating
ENRD, MENRO,
Barangay
July 2012
3000
To ensure legal mandate of
social marketing plan
1. Drafting of indorsement for SB for
the adoption of Social Marketing plan
TWG Chairpersons
June 2011
2. Drafting of the resolution
recognition & approval of the SM plan
TWG Chairpersons
June 2011
1. Brainstorm on possible products
Tourism officer, SB Chair
on Tourism, PO, Resort
owners
2. Production of collaterals
Tourism officer, SB Chair
on Tourism
Aug-Sept
2011
Management plan
(100%)
Management body
(70%)
32:
performance
M&E
Legal Instrument (100%)
To initiate environmentfriendly enterprises supportive
of the MPA
Financing (71.4%)
35 &49
2. 2nd iteration of MPA management
rating
Budget
July 2013
Jul-11
20,000
3. Invite the service providers within
the province of Neg. Or.
Enforcement
Monitoring & Evaluation
25
Ensure 24/7 guarding of the
MPA to achieve Level 3 by
2012
1. To formulate enforcement plan
MENRO, Bantay Dagat,
ENRD, PNP, MFARMC
October 2011
To establish a system ensuring
the annual conduct of
participatory biophysical M &
E
1. Mainstreaming of participatory
biophysical M & E in the MPA plan
ENRD, MENRO,
Barangay, TWG,
MFARMC, Monitoring
Team
May 2011
15,000
24
66
2. Note: start the design immediately
after the campaign
34
Maintenance of
Infrastructure
46
To improve MPA
infrastructure (e.g.
guardhouse)
3. Expansion of the CMFM Community
Monitoring and Feedback Mechanism
(monthly monitoring - basis for
awards)
TWG, MENRO
1. Repair of guardhouse
FA, MENRO, Barangay,
ENRD, Bantay Dagat,
Rare
October 2011
100,000
2. Installation of electricity
Barangay
October 2011
5,000
243000
67
D.Monitoring Plan
Below the KAP section of the monitoring plan
68
E. WORK PLAN WITH BUDGET
The specific activities and budget for the campaign are outlines in a separate excel spreadsheet.
Once it is complete you can insert a brief reference to it here listing some of the key activities and the total budget.
69
F. ENDORSEMENT OF THIS PLAN
70
References and Acknowledgements
References
(August 23, 2010) http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/4615/0
Stockwell, Brian, Jadloc, Claro Renato, Maypa, Jasper P. and Portia Nillos-Kleiven. 2007. Preliminary Report: Biophysical Survey of
Coral Reefs in Amlan, Negros Oriental. Silliman University Angelo King Center for Research and Environmental Management
(SUAKCREM), Silliman University, Dumaguete City, 6200
Uychiaocho, A.J., S.J. Green, M.T. dela Cruz, P.A. Gaite, H.O. Arceo, P.M. Aliño, and A.T. White. 2010. Coral Reef Monitoring for
Management. University of the Philippines Marine Science Institute, United Nations Development Programme Global Environment
Facility-Small Grants Program, Guiuan Development Foundation, Inc., Voluntary Service Overseas, University of the Philippines Center
for Integration and Development Studies, Coastal Resource Management Project, Philippine Environmental Project 2, and Fisheries
Resource Management Project. 122 p.
Yambao, A.C., A.T. White, W.E. Ablong and M.R. Alcala. 2001. Coastal Environmental Profile of Negros Oriental, Philippines.
Coastal Resource Management Project, Cebu City, Philippines, 107 p.
Acknowledgements
Insert a brief note acknowledging and thanking all those who helped you produce this plan.
71
APPENDICES
1. Fisheries profile
Refer to fisheries profile template for this, insert only those sections that you have done through your PCRA
In Tandayag the types of infringement inside the MPA include fishing, with the use of hook and line and fish traps; gleaning and bathing; and using the area as passageway or
short cut to the shore. It is estimated that about 80% of infringement comes from neighboring towns and barangays. Fishing in the MPA usually happens at dawn (fishing time)
during special occasions, such as fiesta and Christmas when everyone are busy doing their own thing for the preparation. Most often, with hook and line fishing, there are just
one or two persons in a non-motorized boat. This differs with fishing with the use of fish trap where it needed at least three persons and with motorized boat. Gleaning
happens anytime of the day and sometimes is combined with bathing. Other form of infringement, as mentioned earlier, is using the area as passageway or short cut to the
shore. The three Bantay Dagat members assigned solely for the MPA enforcement face their challenge since marker buoys are always lost due to strong current in the area.
MPA enforcement in Bio-os is somehow very challenging considering its offshore location and the strong waves and currents. Types of infringement in Bio-os MPA are quite
similar to Tandayag except for gleaning and bathing. Most of the violators are from neighboring towns.
Enforcement System. The on-duty Bantay Dagat member will inform the MENRO (through personal cellphones) of any encroachment into the MPA and the MENRO will
coordinate the PNP. At any case, if the type of violation is somewhat heavy, e.g. fishing in the MPA then the MENRO will seek assistance from the PNP/ Police Environmental
Desk Officer to lead the apprehension. Otherwise, the on-duty Bantay Dagat member will simply approach the violator and inform the person on the MPA rules and regulations
and his/her violation (gleaning, bathing in the MPA). However, if it is no longer a first offense, then apprehension will take place.
Cases of infractions. The infractions are usually recorded at the village level in the Bantay Dagat logbook or directly in the PNP logbook if such would reach municipal level.
The Bantay Dagat member and the MENRO disclosed that the log book got wet (fell down onto the sea) when they had one incident of apprehension of commercial fishing in
the municipal water, sometime in 2009. Since then there is no logbook at the site for the Bantay Dagat to record infractions not until in March 2011 when another logbook was
given by LAP (ENRD) using Rare’s format of recording.
Incentive/disincentive system for the enforcers and the enforcement team as a whole? Village folks, surveillance and PNP. The enforcement team is composed of the
……..The members of the Bantay Dagat receive a monthly incentive in a form of honoraria from both the municipal and the barangay. The honoraria range from P800-1,200 at
the municipal level and P100-300 at the barangay level.
Enforcement processes in the municipality.. Include numbers of apprehensions, cases filed etc. The MPA enforcement process applied is similar to the enforcement of
Municipal waters: apprehension, affidavit writing, filing of case and litigation. There is no exact number as to the apprehensions made and cases filed as there is no proper filing
of such at the enforcement center.
Enforcement system and gaps. The enforcement system is not that effective considering the problem in terms of PNP manpower. Apart from the Police Environmental Desk
Officer (PEDO), there is no other PNP in-charge to assume responsibility in MPA enforcement / apprehensions in the absence of the PEDO. According to the MENRO, in some
instance where the PEDO is not around other PNP Officers are hesitant to go with the Bantay Dagat during apprehensions because of their insufficient knowledge on the MPA
rules and regulations.
Involvement of other community members in enforcing the MPA NTZ (surveillance, reporting, monitoring, guarding)? The coastal community members do not seem to
take care of reporting violations, except for a few, such as the wives and the mothers of the Bantay Dagat members and elected Barangay officials who are residing nearby the
MPA.
72
In Tandayag, there are three (3) Bantay Dagat members who are in-charge of guarding the MPA. This however, is not exactly the case for Bio-os MPA wherein members of the
Takot Diot Fishermen’s Association (25 persons) participate in guarding the MPA, in addition to the 5 members of the Bantay Dagat.
Table 1.a: MPA History and form of infringement, Tandayag MPA
Year
Number of
Types/forms of
infringement
infringement/gears
used
Intruders
(from
where, who,
age group)
Year 1-1997 (After MPA
establishment in 1996)
15
Compressor fishing,
Hook & Line, Gill Nets,
Gleaning
Fishers from
San Jose,
Amlan
Year 2 (1998)
10
Compressor fishing,
Hook & Line, Gill nets,
Gleaning
San Jose,
Amlan local
fishers
Year 3 (1999)
5
Hook & Line, Gleaning
Amlan local
fishers
Year 4-7 (2000-2003)
30
Spear Fishing (SCUBA
gears), Gleaning
Year 8-11 (2004-2007)
2
Gill net, Gleaning
Year 12-15 (2007-2010)
3
1- Gill net, 2 Fish traps
Year 16 (2011)
1
Bathing/ swimming
Amlan local
fishers,
Dumaguete
City SCUBA
divers
Amlan local
fishers
San Jose
(Neighboring
town)
Tandayag
Course/s of
action taken
(apprehension,
affidavit
writing,
litigation,
imprisonment)
Apprehended
by PNP,
Informed
violators about
the MPA rules
and regulations
Apprehended,
Informed the
violators about
the MPA rules
and regulations
Apprehended
Apprehended
Apprehended
Apprehended
Called the
attention
Forms of
incentives/disincentives
Confiscation of fishing
paraphernalia and fish
species caught;
penalized depending on
the degree of offense
Confiscation of fishing
paraphernalia and fish
species caught;
penalized depending on
the degree of offense
Confiscation of fishing
paraphernalia and fish
species caught;
penalized depending on
the degree of offense
Confiscation of spear
guns and fish species
caught; penalized
depending on the
degree of offense
Community Service,
penalized
Confiscation of fish
species caught
None
73
Year
Table 1.b: MPA History and form of infringement, Bio-os MPA
Number of
Types/forms of
Intruders
infringement
infringement/gears
(from where,
used
who, age
group)
Year 1- 2000 (After
MPA establishment in
1999)
15
Year 2-4 (2001-2003)
8
Year 5-10 (2004-2009)
4
Year 11 (2010)
0
Course/s of action
taken (apprehension,
affidavit writing,
litigation,
imprisonment)
Apprehended,
Informed the violators
about the MPA rules
and regulations
Forms of
incentives/disincentives
Confiscation of fishing
paraphernalia and fish species
caught; penalized
Confiscation of fishing
paraphernalia and fish species
caught; penalized
Fish traps, Hook &
Line, Spear (both
SCUBA & Skin
diving), Gill net,
Compressor
Fish traps, Hook &
Line, Spear
Tanjay, Amlan
Tanjay
Apprehended
Fish traps, Hook &
Line, Spear
(occasional)
Tanjay
Apprehended
Confiscation of fishing
paraphernalia and fish species
caught; penalized
Table xy: Enforcement structures and logistics and conditions, Tandayag MPA
Structures in place/Logistics present
Number
Condition/status
Use/number of users
1. Guardhouse
1
Temporary, Needs renovation
3 Bantay Dagat
2. Patrol Boat
2
Good running condition
3 Bantay Dagat
3. Marker buoys
4
Always need replacement due to
strong current
4. Sign Board
2
1 needs replacement
5. MPA info. Board/tarpaulin
1
Needs replacement
Table xy: Enforcement structures and logistics and conditions, Bio-os MPA
Structures in place/Logistics present
Number
Condition/status
Use/number of users
1. Guardhouse
1
Temporary, needs renovation
2. Patrol Boat
2
Good running condition (Back-up- 25
pumpboats of fishers)
3. Marker Buoys
4
Always need replacement due to
strong current
74
4. Sign Board
5. MPA info. material
1.
1
1
Good
Needs replacement
FGD on MPA History and folklore
In 1995, the Center for the establishment of Negros Oriental (CEMRINO) and the German Development Service initiated the survey of coral reefs in Tandayag and Bio-os,
through the partnership with the Provincial Government of Negros Oriental, the Municipality of Amlan and the two Barangays. After the survey, the results were shared to the
community and the partners, though video showing and data presentation. The MPA establishment process also included a series of community consultations and seminars
and information drives about the importance of MPAs and the need for establishment. The Tandayag MPA was then legally established in 1996 through the Municipal
Ordinance No. 02, Series of 1996 and Bio-os MPA in 1999 through Municipal Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1999.
Indigenous knowledge/folklores relating to management (species specific or multi fishery) and relating to the MPA area.
Fish species and number overtime. Old fishers in Tandayag and Bio-os disclosed that in the early ‘60s there were a variety of marine species such as large Groupers, Snappers,
lobsters, triton shells and bivalves. They claimed that in the ‘80s most of these species mentioned, except for triton shells, could still be found but in small sizes and in small
quantity. This scenario changed in the ’90s when triton shells became extinct in the area and lobsters were endangered. The reef fish species at that time also declined and
fishers had to shift from nearshore to deepsea fishing. The entire fishery situation could have continued if it were not due to the coastal resource management program in the
late 1990, such as habitat management of which MPA establishment has been part of. The main purpose of such program was to restore degraded habitats and their
associated organisms. After a decade of on- and off- protection, it is surprising to know that the fish catch of marginal fishers slightly increase in nearshore and deepsea. There
could have been more benefits from the MPA if the protection efforts were seriously undertaken in the past years.
Social, Economic and Ecological Impact of MPA. Since the MPA establishment, the community members revived some of their values such as unity in the midst of diversity,
“bayanihan”and the spirit of volunteerism- helping each other without expecting any return of favor. The economic impact of the MPA to the community was only felt by
some, particularly fishers who claimed that their catch has slightly increased. Ecologically, many people (beach goers from other barangays, fishers, and those who live nearby)
said that corals and associated species have increased compared to the past years when the MPA was not established yet.
2. Fish catch and gear inventory
Most fishers in Tandayag and Bio-os used one gear (Hook and Line) since the other gears like fish nets and fish traps are expensive. Hook and line, a traditional
method used by fishers until now, is cheap to maintain and easy to keep. Fish corral, common in 1970s, are no longer popular nowadays because it is expensive
and the volume of fish species caught cannot compensate (return of investment) as fish population that can be caught by this type of gear declined. The most
75
commonly caught fish species are tunas and mackerels using hook and line and sometimes fish nets. Only very few fishers used multiple gear types and these
are the ones who have rich relatives who helped them in putting up their capital.
There was also a gear shift when R.A. 8550, otherwise known as the Fisheries Code of 1998, prohibiting the use of beach seine, was implemented. Fishers who
used this gear type changed to either hook and line or gill nets.
Hook and line are used all year round, with at its peak during the months of summer when the northeast monsoon is over. Fishers who have multiple gear types
change their gear with the season of certain pelagic fish species. During the northeast monsoon (November to February), when the season for tunas and
mackerel and sardines is at its peak, fishers would use nets in addition to hook and line.
Most commonly used gears and frequency of use. The first 5 common gears used in Tandayag and Bio-os are: (1) Single Hook and Line, (2) Multiple Hook and
Line, (3) Gill nets, (3) Fish Traps. Single hook and line, locally known as “Pamugtaw” is made of single hook and a nylone monoline. Multiple hook and line, local
name “Birek-birek” (250-300 hooks) and “Lasdak” (12 hooks). Gill nets include “Padumog” (#14 mm) and “Palaran” #8 mm). Fish traps are made of bamboo
sticks weaved and constructed to form a certain size (1.5m x 1m). The single hook and line (Pamugtaw) is operated by one or two persons towing for two-four
hours to attract species of tunas. Unlike” Pamugtaw”, “Birek-birek” needs two boats, positioned at opposite ends holding the long line. “Padumog” and
“Palaran” are drift nets set at the surface part. They are suspended for four hours. Fish traps are set during calm weather condition as these are set at deeper
part and are left for a week. This method is laborious, same as fish nets. Of the different fishing methods, single hook and line is the most preferred one because
it is simple to operate and maintain and are used whole-year round. Fish nets are only used especially during peak season for sardines (November to March).
Fishing practices in the mangrove, seagrass areas, coral reefs, and deep sea. There are varied forms of fishing in deep sea compared to other ecosystems such
as mangroves, seagrass meadows, and coral reefs. Fishing gears used would differ on the fish species. Most fishers in Tandayag and Bio-os fish in deep sea
during the season for tunas and mackerels and shift to coral reef during off season of this species. Fishers occasionally fish in the mangrove ecosystem during
bad weather conditions, when the sea turns rough. During summer months are the season for bangus or milkfish fry. This is when some fishers (children, wives
of fishermen) would go in the seagrass area or shallow sandy area to catch bangus fries.
Table 2: Top 10 species caught in the mangrove habitat, Tandayag and Bio-os
Local name
English name
Gear use/ Method
1. Kitong
Rabbitfishes
Fish Net
2. Katambak Emperors
Hook and Line
3. Bugaong
Tigerfishes
Fish Net
(Terapon sp.)
4. Palangan
Glassy fishes
Fish Net
(Fam. Ambassidae)
5. Balanak
Mullets
Fish Net
Target/ Non-target
Target
Target
Target
Target
Target
76
6. Alimango
7. Tuway
8. Gisaw
9. Pasayan
10.
Mangagat
Portunid crabs
Bivalves
(Fam. Corbiculidae-Geloina sp.)
Mullets
Penaeid shrimps (Fam.
Peraeidae)
Red snapper, Mangrove jacks
Gleaning
Target
Target
Fish net (Pang-gisaw)
Fish Net (Sikpaw)
Non-target
Target
Fish Nets
Target
Template 3: Top 10 species caught in the seagrass communities, Tandayag and Bio-os
English name
Gear use
Target/ Non-target
Rabbitfishes
Hook and Line
Triggerfishes
Hook and Line
Rabbitfishes
Hook and Line
Wrasses
Fish nets
Non-target
Tigerfishes
Fish Net
(Terapon sp.)
6. Katambak
Emperors
Hook and Line
Target
7. Timbongan Goatfishes
Gill net (Aghid, Padumog)
Target
8. Hinok
Goatfishes
Gill net (Aghid, Padumog)
Target
9. BilongHook and Line
Bilong
9. Gisaw
Mullets
Fish Nets
Non-Target
10. Sap-sap
Slipmouths
Fish Nets
Non-Target
Local name
1. Kitong
2. Bulaknitan
3. Balawis
4. Labayan
5. Bugaong
Local name
1. Lalagan
2. Mamsa
3. Lapu-lapu
4. Solid
5. Holokihok
6. Timbongan
7. Hinok
8. Kitong
Table 4.1: Top 10 species caught in the coral reefs, Tandayag MPA
English name
Gear use
Snappers
Hook & Line, Gill net
Jackfishes
Fish Trap, Gill net, Hook & Line
Groupers
Hook & Line
Fusiliers
Fish trap, Gill net
Fusiliers
Fish trap, Gill net
Goatfishes
Fish trap, Gill net
Goatfishes
Fish trap, Gill net
Rabbitfishes
Hook & Line
Target/ Non-target
Target
Target
Target
Target
Target
Target
Target
Target
77
9. Mol-mol
10. Indangan
Parrotfishes
Surgeonfishes
Hook & Line
Hook & Line
Local name
1. Mamsa
2. Lapu-lapu
3. Lalagan
4. Holokihok
5. Solid
6. Hinok
7. Timbongan
8. Katambak
9. Mol-mol
10. Litki
Table 4.2: Top 10 species caught in the coral reefs, Bio-os MPA
English name
Gear use
Jackfishes
Fish Trap, Gill net, Hook & Line
Groupers
Hook & Line
Snappers
Hook & Line
Fusiliers
Fish trap, Hook & Line
Fusiliers
Fish trap, Hook & Line
Goatfishes
Fish trap, Gill net
Goatfishes
Fish trap, Gill net
Emperors
Hook & Line
Parrotfishes
Hook & Line
Sweetlips
Hook & Line
Table 5.1: Top 10 species caught in the deep seas, Tandayag MPA
Local name
English name
Gear use
1. Malalangsi
Sardines
Gill net
2. Tulingan
Tunas
Hook and Line
3. Tangigue
Mackerels
Hook and Line
4. Anduhaw
Mackerels
Gill net, Hook & Line
5. Bilong-bilong
Moonfishes
Fish Net
6. Bulgan
Big eyes
Hook and Line
7. Tamarong
Scads
Hook and Line (multiple), Gill net
8. Bugkanon
Tunas
Hook & Line (multiple)
9. Manulsog
Hook & Line (multiple)
10. Tulirog
Hook & Line (multiple), Gill net
Local name
1. Pulag-ikog
2. Anduhaw
3. Tamarong
4. Malalangsi
Target
Target
Target/ Non-target
Target
Target
Target
Target
Target
Target
Target
Target
Target
Target
Target/ Non-target
Target
Target
Target
Target
Non-target
Target
Target
Target
Target
Target
Table 5.2: Top 10 species caught in the deep seas, Bio-os MPA
English name
Gear use
Scads
Gill net, Hook & Line
Mackerels
Drift Gill net (Panganduhaw), Multiple Hook & Line
(Rastrelliger kanagurta)
Scads (Selar sp.)
Gill net, Hook & Line
Sardines
Gill net
Target/ Non-target
Target
Target
Target
Target
78
5. Tuloy
6. Panit
7. Rompi
8. Tangigi
9. Ihalason
10. Nokos
Gill net
Hook & Line
Hook and Line
Hook & Line (single)
Gill net, Hook & Line
Jigger (Pangnukos)
Yellow fin tuna
Barracudas
Mackerels
Tunas
Squids
Target
Target
Target
Target
Target
Target
Table 6.1: Gear inventory, Tandayag MPA
List of all gears in the village
Regulated or not?
What is the type
of regulation?
Total No. in
the barangay
No. of users
in the
barangay
Hook and line (single
“Pamugtaw”)
Hook and line (multiple)
(classify according to number
of hooks and treat each with a
single column)
Not regulated
Not regulated
111
90
Fish trap (bubo)
Not regulated
15
Gill nets
Regulated (only
Amlan fishermen
are allowed)
21
Regulated
Regulated,
allowed at
designated areas
1
5
Beach seine
Fish corral
Spear
No. of
users in
one gear
per trip
Soaking
time
Frequency of use
in a day
List of fish caught
1
Twice a day
Bugkanon (Tunas)
4-5 hours
1-2
Twice a day
Tulirog, Tamarong, Tulingan
(Tunas & Mackerels)
4
2 weeks
5
Twice per month
Indangan, Maya-maya, Holokihok
(Fusiliers)
7-
8-10 hours
2-3
1-2 times a day
Pangmalalangsi
6- Palaran
3
7- Patulay
1- Pamahala
1
3
1
79
Table 6.2: Gear inventory, Bio-os MPA
List of all gears in the village
Hook and Line (single)
“Pamugtaw”
Hook and line (multiple) 200
hooks “Birek-Birek”
Fish trap (bubo)
Gill nets
Cast net (treat each variation
with a single column)
Fish corral
Spear
Regulated or not?
What is the type
of regulation?
Total number
in the
barangay
Not regulated
No. of
users in
one gear
per trip
Soaking
time
Frequency of use
in a day
4-5 hours
Not regulated
61
Regulated (only
Amlan fishermen
are allowed)
Regulated
Regulated (only
Amlan fishermen
are allowed)
Regulated (only
Amlan fishermen
are allowed)
No. of users
in the
barangay
4-5 hours
List of fish caught
Tunas
1
Twice
Mackerel
6
4
Once in two weeks
Jackfish, Surgeonfish
24
6
once
Goatfish, Tuna, Tulakhang,
Malalangsi
1
once
2
1. Socio economic status/practices (focused on fisheries)
In Tandayag, the cost for hook and line fishing ranged from P70-P100. In Bio-os, the cost of same method is higher approximately P370 since fishers are using
motorized boat. The average net income of fishers is about P100 (non-motorized) and P330 (motorized). These could go as much as P200-P300 and P500-600
during peak season and as low as P50 and P100 during lean months. From out of the fishing income, fishers could barely buy food for the family which
comprises about 80% of the total expenditures (10% school, 10% other basic needs). Hence to compensate the income during lean months fishers would either
go farming or work in construction as carpenters. Most fish species favored by fishers are pelagic since most reef fishes populations are declining.
Table xx: Socio-economic, Tandayag
80
Gear type
Hook and line (single)
“Pamugtaw”
Hook and line (multiple)
(“Lasdak”- 12 hooks) (“Pamalo” –
20 hooks)
Fish trap (bubo)
Gill nets (Padumog)
Fish corral
Spear
Expenses per trip
(hook, nylon, net,
bait)
No. of kilograms
caught per trip
Number of kilograms sold
Price per
kilogram
Income
Types of
expense from
sales
1.5
P120
P180
Rice, dried fish
Number of kilos
to take home
P70.00- P100
1.5
P101.00
5
4
P100
P299.00
P200
10
7
P150.00
P330.00
1
One-time expenses
(P75,000)
P32.00
10
8
P100.00
P400.00
1
0.5
None – all catch is brought
home for consumption
----
-----
Rice, coffee,
sugar, salt
-----
none
1
0.5
Table xxx: Socio-economic, Bio-os
Gear type
Hook and line (single)
“Pamugtaw”
Fish trap (bubo)
Fish nets (“Palaran”, “Yab-yab”)
Expenses per trip
(hook, nylon, net, bait)
Number of kilos
caught per trip
Number of
kilos sold
Price per kilo
Income
P300 –gasoline
P20.00
P50 (Others: Bread,
Coffee, Cigarettes to
bring along)
P150.00
8 kg. of Tuna
20 kg. (5 units)
15 kg.
P80.00
P1,200
P200- gasoline
P50 - others
20 kg.
19 kg
P80-P100
P1,520P1,900
Types of expense from
sales
Number of
kilos to
take home
1 kg
7 kg
P100.00
P700.00
Rice, Allowance for
students, cooking oil,
laundry soap, spices
Rice, Allowance for
students, cooking oil,
laundry soap, spices
Rice, Allowance for
students, cooking oil,
laundry soap, spices
5 kg
1 kg
81
Calendar Diagram. Discuss how gear use changes with months/season as well as the fish caught. According to the fishers, they use hook and line, fish nets and
fish traps whole year round. The use of hook and line though increases during the months of May –October, when it is a peak season for tunas and mackerels.
During this season, fishers could save some amount for the enrolment of their children in June. This is also when fishers come together and enjoy.
Livelihood practices during lean months. In Tandayag, lean months start in August and last until February. During these months, fishermen go farming and work
as carpenter s and tailors and other labor jobs to sustain life. In Bio-os, lean months start from November and end in April
Table xxx: Seasonality Diagram, Tandayag
Month
Fish species caught
Gear type
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Gill net, Hook & Line
Gill net, Hook & Line
Gill net, Hook & Line
Gill net, Hook & Line
Hook & Line, Gill net
Hook & Line, Gill net
Hook & Line, Gill net
Hook & Line, Gill net
Hook & Line, Gill net
Hook & Line, Gill net
Hook & Line, Gill net
Hook & Line, Gill net
Month
Malalangsi
Malalangsi
Malalangsi
Malalangsi
Tulirog, Bugkanon, Anduhaw
Tulirog, Bugkanon, Anduhaw
Bugkanon
Bugkanon
Nokos
Nokos
Anduhaw
Anduhaw
Fish species caught
Table xxx 5: Seasonality Diagram, Bio-os
Gear type
Number of users
Gill net
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
Hook & Line
10
10
10
90
90
90
90
30
30
30
30
30
Number of users
82
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Holokihok, Mamsa, Malalangsi
Malalangsi, Tamarong
Anduhaw, Tamarong
Anduhaw, Tamarong
Anduhaw, Tulirog
Anduhaw, Tulirog
Anduhaw, Tulirog
Ihalason, Hinok
Ihalason, Hinok
Ihalason, Hinok
Malalangsi, Hinok
Malalangsi, Hinok
Hook and Line, Fish Net, Fish Trap
Hook and Line, Fish Net
Hook and Line, Gill net
Hook and Line, Gill net
Hook and Line
Hook and Line
Hook and Line
Hook and Line
Hook and Line
Hook and Line
Hook and Line; Fish Net
Hook and Line; Fish Net
40 H & L; 8 Fish Nets; 10 Fish Traps
40 H & L; 8 Fish Nets
40 H & L; 8 Fish Nets
40 H & L; 8 Fish Nets
80 H & L; 8 Fish Nets
80 H & L; 8 Fish Nets
80 H & L; 8 Fish Nets
80 H & L; 8 Fish Nets
80 H & L; 8 Fish Nets
80 H & L; 8 Fish Nets
40 H & L; 8 Fish Nets
40 H & L; 8 Fish Nets
Trend Diagram
Fish catch trend (1960-present). Based on the PCRA results (2011), there is a decreasing trend in the fish catch of marginal fishers starting from the year 1970s
to 2000. After a decade, there was a slight increase in catch as observed by many marginal fishers.
The decline in fish catch was due to the increase in the number of both marginal and commercial fishers (brought about by the increase in population in 1970s)
and the use of destructive fishing methods in the ‘70s. Destructive and extractive practices of fishing have both damaged the mangrove, seagrass and coral reef
ecosystems, which are important habitats for many marine fish species. In the late 1990s when the program on coastal resource management was introduced
through MPA establishment and other habitat restoration initiatives (such as mangrove enrichment planting), and the prohibition of certain gear types, there is
slight increase in fish catch.
The decreasing trend of fish catch became known to most community members when in the late 90’s fish supply in the market was scarce. Also during this time
there was an extensive Information, Education, Communication (IEC) campaign and awareness level heightened. Most people though don’t know that there is
now a slight in fish catch by many marginal fishers, as what they claimed.
The decreasing trend during the time alarmed many people in the community because it is one of the major sources of protein. People, especially the old ones
can’t help not eating fish in one day. Prices of fish during the time were high due to scarcity.
In the 1970’s fishers disclosed that reef fishes such as Jacks, Groupers and Snappers were abundant and the sizes are big. These large fish species can still be
caught but smaller in size and number. What dominated the catch of marginal fishers are labrids, scarids and fusiliers in coral reefs and tunas, mackerels and
sardines in deep sea.
83
Year
Table xxx: Trend Diagram, Tandayag
Major fishery issues/events/history/changes in fishing methods/
1970
Average Catch (Kilogram per
fisher)
30; 200; 100
1980
25; 200; 50
Hook & Line; Fish corral; Fine mesh nets
1990
20; 10; 15
Hook & Line; Fish corral; Fine mesh nets
2000
10; 40
Hook & Line, Gill net “Palaran”, Motorized boats
Present
5; 10
Hook & Line, Gill net “Palaran”, Motorized boats
Year
1965
1975
1985
1995
2005
Present
Kilogram of catch/gear type
25; 300
25; 20
25; 30; 15
15; 15; 8
10; 10; 5
15; 15
Hook & Line; Fish corral; Fine mesh nets
Table xxxx: Trend Diagram, Bio-os
Major fishery issues/events/history/changes in fishing methods/
Hook and Line; Fish Corral
Hook and Line; Fish Corral
Hook and Line, Fish Net; Fish Corral
Hook and Line, Fish Net; Fish Corral
Hook and Line, Fish Net; Fish Corral
Hook and Line, Fish Net
Fish species caught
Goatfishes, Groupers, Emperors,
Jacks
Goatfishes, Groupers, Emperors,
Jacks
Tunas, Mackerels, Fusiliers,
Parrotfishes
Tunas, Mackerels, Sardines,
Parrotfishes, Labrids
Tunas, Mackerels, Sardines
Fish species caught
Groupers, Jacks, Goatfishes
Groupers, Jacks, Goatfishes
Groupers, Jacks, Goatfishes
Tunas and Mackerels, Sardines
Tunas and Mackerels, Sardines
Tunas and Mackerels, Sardines
84
2. Executive Order for TWG & Mancom
85
86
87
3. Survey Questionnaire
(insert final version of questionnaire including maps, photographs and answer sheets used for survey)
Philippines/PEP2 Reef Rangers
QUESTIONNAIRE
Baseline Survey (2011) and Post-campaign Survey (2012)
Hello, my name is ..................., and I am working with the ............... We are conducting a survey of people in this area about the natural environment. We
would very much appreciate your participation in this survey by answering a few questions about the environment. Whatever information you provide will be
kept strictly confidential and your name and answers will not be shown to, or shared with, any other person except for those people who are working on the
survey. Your answers will help us plan and implement a communication program.
You must be at least 15 years old in order to participate in our survey.
Participation in this survey is voluntary and you can choose not to answer any individual question or all of the questions. However, your views are important to
us and I hope you will participate. May I begin the interview now?
Respondent agrees to be interviewed (If no, keep tally on separate sheet of paper): [ ] Yes
Section 1: Background information filled in prior to the interview without asking the respondent
Interviewer: __________________________________________
Barangay Tandayag:
[ ] Tandayag Sur
[ ] Tandayag Central
[ ] Tandayag Norte
Barangay Bio-os:
[ ] Buswang
[ ] Cambisay
[ ] Cambajo
[ ] Talay
[ ] Highway
[ ] Sug-ong
[ ] Tabuan
88
Other barangay:
Enumeration area (EA):
Date (month/day/year):
Survey period:
[ ] Post-campaign (June 2012)
[ ] Pre campaign - Baseline (Feb 2011)
Gender of respondent:
[ ] Male
Sampling methodology:
[ ] random community
of Tandayag
[ ] random community
of Bio-os
[ ] MPA Enforcement
Team
[ ] Amlan-LGU employee
[ ] Female
[ ] fishers of Tandayag
[ ] fishers of Bio-os
Section 2: Socioeconomic and Demographic Questions
"To begin, I would like to ask you some questions about yourself"
(1) Which of the following statements best describes you [choose only ONE]:
-You are a fisher that fished at least 1 time in the past month near the Tandayag Marine Sanctuary,
- You are a fisher that fished at least 1 time in the past month in the Tandayag Marine Sanctuary,
- You are a gleaner that gleaned at least 1 time in the past month near the Tandayag Marine Sanctuary,
- You are a gleaner that gleaner at least 1 time in the past month in the Tandayag Marine Sanctuary,
[ ] You are a fisher at least 1 time in the past
month near Tandayag Marine Sanctuary
[ ] You are a fisher at
least 1 time in the past
[ ] You are a gleaner at
least 1 time in the past
[ ] You are a gleaner at
least 1 time in the past
[ ] None of the above
89
month in Tandayag
Marine Sanctuary
month near Tandayag
Marine Sanctuary
month in Tandayag
Marine Sanctuary
(2) Which of the following statements best describes you [choose only ONE]:
-You are a fisher that fished at least 1 time in the past month near the Bio-os Marine Sanctuary,
- You are a fisher that fished at least 1 time in the past month in the Bio-os Marine Sanctuary,
- You are a gleaner that gleaned at least 1 time in the past month near the Bio-os Marine Sanctuary,
- You are a gleaner that gleaner at least 1 time in the past month in the Bio-os Marine Sanctuary,
[ ] You are a fisher that fished at least 1 time
in the past month near the Bio-os Sanctuary
[ ] You are a fisher that
fished at least 1 time in
the past month in the
Bio-os Sanctuary
[ ] You are a gleaner
that gleaned at least 1
time in the past month
near the Bio-os Marine
Sanctuary
[ ] You are a gleaner that [ ] None of the above
gleaned at least 1 time
in past month in the Bioos Marine Sanctuary
(3) Where do you live in relation to the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary? Do you live inside of Tandayag / Bio-os, In Amlan, outside of Amlan, or somewhere
else? [choose only ONE]
[ ] I do not live in
Tandayag / Bio-os, but I
live in Amlan
[ ] I live in Tandayag
[ ] I live in Bio-os
[ ] I live outside of
Amlan
[ ] Other_____________
(4) How old are you?
[ ] 14 or younger
older
[ ] 15 to 19
[ ] 20 to 24
[ ] 25 to 29
[ ] 30 to 34
[ ] 35 to 39
[ ] 40 to 44
[ ] 45 to 49
[ ] 50 to 54
[ ] 55 or
(5) What is your highest level of education attained?". [choose only ONE]
[ ] Not completed any education
[ ] Elementary level not completed
[ ] High school level not completed
[ ] Completed elementary
[]
Completed high school [ ] College level not completed [ ] College level completed
[ ] Completed two-year course [ ] Completed four-year course [ ]
Refused to answer
90
(6) What religion do you belong? If you do not belong to a religion, please say "NONE". [choose ONE only]
[ ] Roman catholic
[ ] Iglesia Ni Kristo
answer [ ] None[ ] Other ________________
[ ] Jehova's Witness
[ ] Muslim
[ ] Protestant
[ ] Jewish
[ ] Local/traditional
[ ] Refuses to
(7) What is your primary occupation or sector in which you work? [choose ONE only]
[ ] Agriculture [ ] Fishing
[ ] Gleaning
[ ] Logging, mining, other extractive industry
[ ] Small business (shop keeper or sales person) [ ] Office work
[ ] Factory or manufacturing
[ ] Food preparation or restaurant
[ ] Professional (Lawyer, Health care provider) [ ] Artisan (crafts)
[ ] Transportation (shipping, trucking, rail)
[ ] Education
[ ] housework [ ] student
[ ] Not currently employed
[ ] other private
company
[ ] non-government organization [ ] self- employed
[ ] government (local) [ ] government (state or national)
[ ] Other
________________
[ ] N/A
(8) What is your secondary occupation or sector in which you work? [choose one only]
[ ] Agriculture [ ] Fishing
[ ] Gleaning
[ ] Logging, mining, other extractive industry
[ ] Small business (shop keeper or sales person) [ ] Office work
[ ] Factory or manufacturing
[ ] Food preparation or restaurant
[ ] Professional (Lawyer, Health care provider) [ ] Artisan (crafts)
[ ] Transportation (shipping, trucking, rail)
[ ] Education [ ] housework [ ] student
[ ] Not currently employed
[ ] other private
company
[ ] non-governmental organization
[ ] self -employed
[ ] government (local) [ ] government (state or national)
[]
Other ________________
[ ] N/A
(9) If fisherman, what type of fishing gear do you use? [You can give more than one answer]
[ ] Gill net
[ ] Fish trap
[ ] Hook and Line
[ ] Spear fishing [ ] Other ________________ [ ] NA
(10) Does any of the following apply to you?
[ ] Former Bantay Dagat Member
Association member
[ ] Current Bantay Dagat Member
[ ] Former Fishermen Association member
[ ] Current Fishermen
(11) How many people live in your household?
[ ] 1 (me)
[]2
[]3
[]4
[]5
[]6
[]7
[]8
[]9
[ ] 10
[ ] More than 10
91
(12) In the past calendar year, from January to December, what is your best estimate of the total income earned by all family members who are living with you.
Again, this information will not be shared with anyone.
[ ] Below 30,000 Pesos [ ] Between 30,000 and 50,000 [ ] Between 50,001 and 75,000 [ ] Between 75,001 and 100,000 [ ] Greater than 100,000 Pesos W
[ ] Not sure
[ ] Refused
(13) What percentage of this annual income comes from fishing?
[ ] 0% [ ] 1 - 20%
[ ] 21 - 40%
[ ] 41 - 60%
[ ] 61 - 80%
[ ] 81 - 100%
(14) What percentage of this annual income comes from gleaning?
[ ] 0% [ ] 1 - 20%
[ ] 21 - 40%
[ ] 41 - 60%
[ ] 61 - 80%
[ ] 81 - 100%
Section 3: Trusted Sources of Information & Media Access/Exposure
(15) People hear information about the environment from many different sources. Please tell me whether you would find these sources as "Most trustworthy,
Very trustworthy, Somewhat trustworthy, or Not trustworthy.
(A) Person on the radio:
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
[ ] Somewhat trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
[ ] Somewhat trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
(B) Kuya Kim
[ ] Most trustworthy
(C) National government environment officials
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
(D) Local government environment officials
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
(E) Religious leaders
92
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
[ ] Somewhat trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
[ ] Somewhat trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
[ ] Somewhat trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
[ ] Somewhat trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
[ ] Somewhat trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
(F) Friends or family members
[ ] Most trustworthy
(G) Teachers
[ ] Most trustworthy
(H) Scientist
[ ] Most trustworthy
(I) Information on poster or billboard
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
(J) Information in printed booklet
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
(K) Information from puppet show
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
(L) Information from public meeting
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
(M) Conservation group volunteer
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
(N) Non-government organization environmental officials
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat trustworthy
93
(O) Local Community Leaders
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
[ ] Somewhat trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
(P) Bantay Dagat
[ ] Most trustworthy
(Q) MENRO staff
[ ] Most trustworthy
(R) Barangay Captain
[ ] Most trustworthy
(S) Information received via sms on your phone
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
(T) Who would you trust the most (from list above or other) if they tell you something about the environment?
[ ] person on radio
[ ] person on television [ ] law enforcement official
[ ] national government environment official
[ ] local government
environment official
[ ] local community leaders
[ ] Religious Leaders
[ ] friends or family members [ ] Teachers
[ ] information on
poster or billboard
[ ] information in printed booklet
[ ] information from puppet show
[ ] information from public meeting or festival [ ]
conservation group volunteer [ ] Non-government environmental officials
[ ] Barangay Captain
[ ] MPA Manager
[ ] Bantay Dagat
[ ] Other ________________ [ ] N/A
(16) Out of ABS-CBN Dumaguete, Fil Products and Local Sky Cable TV stations which one do you watch the most? [Choose only ONE]. If you don't watch them at
all, select Don't watch. If other local stations, specify which one. [If don't watch go straight to question 17]
[ ] ABS-CBN, Dumaguete
[ ] Fil Products [ ] Local Sky Cable
[ ] Don't watch [ ] Other ________________
[ ] N/A
(A) In the past month, how often did you watch this channel., never, up to 3 days per week, 4 to 6 days per week, or daily?
[ ] Never
[ ] Up to 3 days per week
[ ] 4 to 6 days per week [ ] daily
94
(B) When you watch this TV channel during the week, Monday to Friday, what are the most likely times for you to watch TV? Please indicate up to 2 times
during the day when you are most likely to watch.
[ ] Before 6:00 a.m.
[ ] 6:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
[ ] 10:01 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
[ ] 2:01 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
10:00 p.m.
[ ] No particular time [ ] Off and on all day
[ ] Don't know [ ] Don't watch/listen
[ ] 6:01 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
[ ] After
(C) When you watch this channel TV during the weekend, Saturday to Sunday, what are the most likely times for you to watch TV? Please indicate up to 2 times
during the day when you are most likely to watch.
[ ] Before 6:00 a.m.
[ ] 6:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
[ ] 10:01 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
[ ] 2:01 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
10:00 p.m.
[ ] No particular time [ ] Off and on all day
[ ] Don't know [ ] Don't watch/listen
[ ] 6:01 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
[ ] After
(17) Out of the following radio stations which one do you listen the most?[ DYWC, Love Radio, Power 91, DYEM FM, Bombo Radio. Choose only one]. If
respondent does not listen to radio, select Don't listen and go straight to question 18. If other local stations specify.
[ ] DYWC
[ ] Love Radio
[ ] Power 91
[ ] DYEM FM
[ ] Bombo Radio[ ] Don't listen to the radio
[ ] Other ________________
[ ] N/A
(18) In the past month, how often did listen to the radio station selected above? never, up to 3 days per week, 4 to 6 days per week, or daily.
[ ] Never
[ ] Up to 3 days per week
[ ] 4 to 6 days per week [ ] daily
(A) What is your favorite type of program that you like to listen to in the radio? Please indicate up to TWO program types you like to listen to.
[ ] Local music [ ] International music [ ] News
Don't listen to radio
[ ] Other ________________
[ ] Sports
[ ] Radio program
[ ] Dramas
[ ] Religious
[ ] No favorite [ ]
(B) When you listen to the above- selected radio station during the week, Monday to Friday, what are the most likely times for you to listen to the radio? Please
indicate up to TWO times during the day when you are most likely to listen.
[ ] Before 6:00 a.m.
[ ] 6:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
[ ] 10:01 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
[ ] 2:01 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
10:00 p.m.
[ ] No particular time [ ] Off and on all day
[ ] Don't know [ ] Don't watch/listen
[ ] 6:01 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
[ ] After
(C) When you listen to the above-selected radio station during the weekend, Saturday and Sunday, what are the most likely times for you to listen to the radio?
Please indicate up to TWO times during the day when you are likely to listen.
95
[ ] Before 6:00 a.m.
[ ] 6:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
[ ] 10:01 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
[ ] 2:01 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
10:00 p.m.
[ ] No particular time [ ] Off and on all day
[ ] Don't know [ ] Don't watch/listen
[ ] 6:01 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
[ ] After
(19) Which newspaper or magazine do you usually read. Please tell me up to THREE publications that you read most often.
[ ] Daily Enquirer
[ ] Negros Chronicle
[ ] Manila Bulletin
[ ] Don't read
[ ] Other ________________
[ ] N/A
(20) How much do you like or not like each of the following entertainment programs? Do you like it the most, like it a lot, like it a little, or not like it?
(A) Tagalog Love Melodies
[ ] Like the most[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
(B) Classic Oldies Music: [ ] Like the most
[ ] Not liked
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(C) Traditional Music: [ ] Like the most [ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(D) Local news: [ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(E) Badminton: [ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(F) Tennis: [ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(G) Biking: [ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(H) Basketball: [ ] Like the most [ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(I) Religious programs: [ ] Like the most [ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(J) Miss Dreamland: [ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
[ ] Like a lot
(K) Concert: [ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(L) Dramas: [ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(M) Los Companeros: [ ] Like the most [ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(N) Puppet shows: [ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
[ ] Like a lot
(O) Internet (YouTube and Websites): [ ] Like the most [ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
96
(P) www.amlan.gov.ph: [ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(Q) Open-air video showing: [ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(R) Radio program: [ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(S) Fluvial Parade: [ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(T) Budyas Festival: [ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(U) What other types of media programs do you like to watch, listen to, or read about? __________________________
(21) Who are your favorite local singers? [name up to THREE]
[]a
[]b
[]c
[ ] Other ________________
[ ] N/A
Section 4: Assign Respondent to Stage-of-Behavior-Change
(22) Do you glean or fish or both? (choose only ONE)
[ ] yes I glean
[ ] yes I fish
[ ] yes I glean and fish
[ ] no I don't glean and don't fish
[ ] N/A
(23) (If respondent said no I don't fish in question 22 then don't ask question and select "behavior is not relevant to this respondent")
I am going to read you a list of 6 statement about whether or not you have gone fishing in the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 months. I want
you to listen to all 6 statements, then tell me which one statement best represents you:
[ ] I have never considered to stop fishing in Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary.
[ ] I have considered to stop fishing in Tandayag / Bio-os Marine
Sanctuary but do not want to stop doing so
[ ] I intend to stop fishing in Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the next 6 months but have not done so yet
[ ] I have talked to someone about stopping fishing in Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 months. [ ] I have only gone fishing in the
Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary a few times in the past 6 months [ ] I have not fished in the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 months
[ ] Behavior is not relevant for this respondent
(24) (If respondent said no I don't glean in question 22 then don't ask question and select "behavior is not relevant to this respondent")
I am going to read you a list of 6 statement about whether or not you have gleaning in the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 months. I want you
to listen to all 6 statements, then tell me which one statement best represents you:
[ ] I have never considered to stop gleaning in Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary
[ ] I have considered to stop gleaning but do not want to stop doing so
[ ] I intend to stop fishing in Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the next 6 months but have not done so yet [ ] I have talked to someone about
stopping the gleaning in Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 months
[ ] I have only gone gleaning in the Tandayag/ Bio-os Marine Sanctuary a
97
few times in the past 6 months [ ] I have not gleaned in the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 months
respondent
[ ] Behavior is not relevant for this
(25) Of the 6 statements about regulations of the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary, which one best represents you?
[ ] I have never considered following the regulations of Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary
[ ] I have considered following the regulations of Tandayag /
Bio-os Marine Sanctuary but don't want to do so
[ ] I intend to follow the regulations of Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the next 6 months.[ ] I
have talked to someone about following the regulations of the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 months.
[ ] I often follow the regulations
of Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary but not at all times.
[ ] I have always followed the regulations of Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the past 12
months.
[ ] Behavior not relevant to this respondent
(26) Of the following 6 statements about whether or not you have been involved in governance and management of Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the
past 6 months, which one best represents you:
[ ] I have never considered attending meetings for Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary Management
[ ] I have considered attending meetings
for Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary Management, but don't want to do it [ ] I intend to attend meetings for Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary
Management in the next 6 months but have not done so yet
[ ] I have talked to someone about attending meetings of Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary Management in the last 12 months.
[ ] I have attended at least 1 meetings for Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary Management in the last 12 months.
[ ] I have attended at least 6 meetings for Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary Management in the last 12 months.
[ ] Behavior is not relevant for this respondent
Section 5: Establish Baselines for and Measure Change in Knowledge SMART Objectives
Now, I would like to ask you some questions about the local environment and wildlife that live in this area.
(27) Please state below whether you believe each regulation is either true or false for the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary Rules/Policies:
(A) Only members of Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary Management Committee can harvest fish inside the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary
[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure
(B) No-one can fish or collect shells inside Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary: [ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure
(C) Only Hook and Line fishing is allowed inside Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary: [ ] True
[ ] False [ ] Unsure
98
(D) Anyone can glean inside Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary, just fishing is not allowed: [ ] True [ ] False
[ ] Unsure
(E) It is legal to use cyanide and dynamite to catch fish in the buffer zone around Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary
[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure
(F) The elected officials are allowed to take fish from Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary when they visit
[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure
(G) When a Bantay Dagat ends his shift, he has to wait for the next Bantay Dagat to arrive before he can leave the Tandayag / Bio-os MPA guardhouse: [ ] True
[ ] False
[ ] Unsure
(28) Some of the questions I am going to ask you are about the no-take fishing area that is going to be or has been created in your local area. A no-take fishing
area is a clearly identified area where no fish are allowed to be caught at any time by anyone.
(A) Are there any benefits to the local community from having a no-take area nearby? (If respondent answers YES then please also ask next question)
[ ] Yes [ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(B) (Ask only of those who said yes to previous question)
What local community benefits are there from having the no-take area nearby? You can tell me up to 3 that you know. (Do NOT read out answers but tick as
appropriate or add to other)
[ ] more fish [ ] area for fish to reproduce
[ ] bigger fish [ ] bigger or better coral / habitat for fish
[ ] more fertile fish
[ ] bank of the
sea / food security
[ ] better regulation/management of fishing activities [ ] no more destructive fishing in that area
[ ] community ownership
[ ] new skills
[ ] better/new access to tourism [ ] better community cohesion [ ] Other ________________ [ ] N/A
(29) I am going to read you a list of people, and I would like you to tell me for each one how much you believe they have been involved during the past 6 months
in important management decisions, such as in determining the size and location of your local no-take fishing area. Were these individuals regularly involved,
occasionally involved, or never involved?
(A) National Government officials: [ ] Regularly [ ] occasionally
(B) Local Government officials: [ ] Regularly
[ ] Never
[ ] occasionally [ ] Never
(C) Local leaders: [ ] Regularly [ ] occasionally [ ] Never
[ ] Not sure/ Don't know
[ ] Not sure/ Don't know
[ ] Not sure/ Don't know
99
(D) Local fishers: [ ] Regularly [ ] occasionally [ ] Never
[ ] Not sure/ Don't know
(30) I am going to read you a list of people, and I would like you to tell me for each one how much you believe that during the past 6 months they have been
able to determine the regulations for your local no-take fishing area. Were these individuals the most important decision makers, involved but not the decision
makers, or not involved in decision-making?
(A) National Government officials: [ ] Most involved
[ ] Involved
[ ] Not involved [ ] Not sure / Don't know
(B) Local Government officials: [ ] Most involved
[ ] Involved
[ ] Not involved [ ] Not sure / Don't know
(C) Scientists and/or fisheries experts: [ ] Most involved [ ] Involved
[ ] Not involved [ ] Not sure / Don't know
(D) Local leaders: [ ] Most involved
[ ] Involved
[ ] Not involved [ ] Not sure / Don't know
(E) Local fishers: [ ] Most involved
[ ] Involved
[ ] Not involved [ ] Not sure / Don't know
Section 6: Establish Baselines for and Measure Change in Attitude SMART Objectives
(31) Please state below whether you agree or disagree with the following statements on the possible impacts to the local community if the Tandayag / Bio-os
Marine Sanctuary Rules/Policies are not strictly observed by fishers:
(A) Fish will be scared out of the sanctuary and into the fishing nets
[ ] Strongly Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
(B) Fish catch will continue to decline: [ ] Strongly Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
(C) Illegal fishers from outside will be encouraged to come in and fish within Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary
[ ] Strongly Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
(D) The corals begin to die when the fish are taken away
[ ] Strongly Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
(E) The local community will be poorer and less united:
[ ] Strongly Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
(F) Fishers will catch more fish: [ ] Strongly Agree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
100
(32) Please state below whether you agree or disagree with the following statements associated with governance of Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary:
(A) Only members of the Fishermen's Association are involved in the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary management
[ ] Strongly Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
(B) No-one knows who is managing the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary
[ ] Strongly Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
(C) Local Residents know who and what time the guarding takes place and so are able to enter Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary when the guards are not
there
[ ] Strongly Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
(D) The 24/7 guard system is crucial to secure the benefits of the Tandayag/ Bio-os Marine Sanctuaries
[ ] Strongly Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
(E) There is no patrol boat to chase after the illegal fishers, so the illegal fishers just come and ignore the rules knowing they won't be caught: [ ] Strongly Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
(F) Only men are involved in Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary, so the interests and concerns of women or youth are ignored: [ ] Strongly Agree
Agree [ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
[]
(G) The Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary regulations need to be followed by all people who go into the sanctuary.
[ ] Strongly Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
(33) Which of the following statements best represents you about the presence of the Tandayag MPA?
[ ] I am indifferent to its presence [ ] am very proud of it [ ] I view it negatively
[ ] I like it
[ ] I am against it
[ ] N/A
(34) Which of the following statements best represents you about the presence of the Bio-os MPA?
[ ] I am indifferent to its presence [ ] am very proud of it [ ] I view it negatively [ ] I like it
[ ] I am against it
[ ] N/A
(35) Which of the following statements best represents you about involvement in any activities related Tandayag MPA?
[ ] I am indifferent to its presence [ ] am very proud of it [ ] I view it negatively
[ ] I like it
[ ] I am against it
[ ] N/A
101
(36) Which of the following statements best represents you about involvement in any activities related Bio-os MPA?
[ ] I am indifferent to its presence [ ] am very proud of it [ ] I view it negatively
[ ] I like it
[ ] I am against it
[ ] N/A
(37) What is your level of support for increasing the enforcement of the regulations of Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary?
[ ] Strongly do not support the increase in enforcement [ ] Do not support the increase in enforcement [ ] Support the increase in enforcement [ ] Strongly
support the increase in enforcement
[ ] Unsure
(38) What do you think of the size of Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary?
[ ] Too Big
[ ] Too Small
[ ] Just the right size
[ ] Unsure
[ ] N/A
(39) What do you think of the location of Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary?
[ ] In the right place
[ ] In the wrong place
[ ] Unsure
[ ] N/A
(40) Who should primarily enforce the rules and regulations of Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary? Should it be the Coastguard, Fishers/gleaners, the Bantay
dagat, MENRO, the National Police, local village officials, or someone else? (CHOOSE ONE ONLY)
[ ] Coastguard [ ] Fishers/Gleaners
[ ] Bantay Dagat (licensed enforcers)
the Fishermen's Association
[ ] Other ________________
[ ] MENRO
[ ] National Police
[ ] Barangay Council
[ ] Members of
(41) Who would you trust most to head and govern the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary Management Committee? (Choose one only)
[ ] Community members
[ ] Fishers/Gleaners
os Barangay Council
[ ] Local Government officials
Other ________________
[ ] National Police
[ ] Non-government officials
[ ] National government officials[ ] Private sector
[ ] Tandayag Barangay Council [ ] Bio[ ] Academic Sector
[ ] MENRO
[]
(42) Has your catch increased, decreased or stayed the same as a result of Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary? (If the person does not fish or glean mark as
NA): [ ] Decreased
[ ] Increased
[ ] Stayed the Same
[ ] N/A
(43) If the community would decide to increase the size of Tandayag/ Bio-os marine sanctuary, to which part would you prefer it to be extended, Northern,
Southern, towards the sea, around the whole sanctuary?
[ ] Northern part
[ ] Southern part
[ ] towards the sea
[ ] around the MPA
[ ] Not at all
[ ] N/A
102
(44) Tell me which of the activities below are easy or difficult for you to do?
(A) Attend at least 6 of the 12 management meetings of the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary
[ ] Easy [ ] Difficult
[ ] Not sure
[ ] Not applicable
(B) Reporting an intruder of Tandayag/ Bio-os Marine Sanctuary to the enforcement team
[ ] Easy [ ] Difficult
[ ] Not sure
[ ] Not applicable
(C) Run a Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary Committee every month: [ ] Easy [ ] Difficult
[ ] Not sure [ ] NA
(D) Participate in coastal clean-up activity once a year: [ ] Easy [ ] Difficult
[ ] Not sure
[ ] NA
(E) Participate in reef/ MPA monitoring once a year: [ ] Easy
[ ] Not sure
[ ] NA
[ ] Difficult
(45) I am going to read you a number of statements about the management of the local no-take area. For each statement, I would like you to tell me if you
strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with it.
(A) There is a clear plan on how the no-take area will be managed
[ ] SA
[]A
[]D
[ ] SD
[ ] Not Sure/Don’t Know
(B) Local village fishers regularly participate in management decisions of the no-take area
[ ] SA
[]A
[]D
[ ] SD
[ ] NS/DK
(C) Local people know boundaries of the no-take area: [ ] SA
[]A
[]D
[ ] SD
[ ] NS/DK
(D) There was not enough planning done before the no-take area was established
[ ] SA
[]A
[]D
[ ] SD
[ ] NS/DK
(E) There is enough money and other resources to fully manage and enforce the rules of the no-take area
[ ] SA
[]A
[]D
[ ] SD
[ ] NS/DK
(F) The rules of the no-take area are regularly enforced so that violators are caught and punished
[ ] SA
[]A
[]D
[ ] SD
[ ] NS/DK
(G) The rules of the no-take area are unclear and local fishers don't understand them
103
[ ] SA
[]A
[]D
[ ] SD
[ ] NS/DK
(H) The rules of the no-take area are designed more to protect the fish than to help the fishers
[ ] SA [ ] A
[]D
[ ] SD [ ] NS/DK
(I) The infrastructure, equipment and facilities to enforce the rules of the no-take area are adequate
[ ] SA [ ] A
[]D
[ ] SD [ ] NS/DK
(J) There is an adequate communications program about the no-take area: [ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D
(K) Staff of the no-take area are adequately trained:
[ ] SA
[]A
[]D
[ ] SD
[ ] SD
[ ] NS/DK
[ ] Not Sure/Don’t Know
(L) There is a regular management effectiveness assessment conducted for the no-take area
[ ] SA
[]A
[]D
[ ] SD
[ ] NS/DK
(M) Research and monitoring activities of the no take area are adequate: [ ] SA [ ] A
[]D
[ ] SD
[ ] NS/DK
(N) There are no current problems with the no-take area management: [ ] SA
[]D
[ ] SD
[ ] NS/DK
[]A
Section 7: Establish Baselines for and Measure Change in Interpersonal Communication SMART Objectives
(46) In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about benefits to the community of a 24/7 guard system of the Tandayag/Bio-os marine sanctuary? If you
have, with whom have you talked to about this.
[ ] Have not talked to anyone [ ] Talked to spouse/partner
[ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws [ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or older
[ ] Talked to
your children aged 15 or younger
[ ] Talked to friend or neighbor
[ ] Talked to village elder or local authority
[ ] Talked to National
government environmental officials
[ ] Talked to Non-government environment officials
[ ] Talked to Local government environmental officials
[ ] Talked to a Local Tandayag / Bio-os Fisher or Gleaner [ ] Other ________________
(A) If you did talk about this, can you tell me what was the main thing you discussed? ________________
(47) In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about your role in ensuring the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary are well-managed in order to benefit
the community? If you have, with whom you have talked to about this.
104
[ ] Have not talked to anyone [ ] Talked to spouse/partner
[ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws [ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or older
[ ] Talked to
your children aged 15 or younger
[ ] Talked to friend or neighbor
[ ] Talked to village elder or local authority
[ ] Talked to National
government environmental officials
[ ] Talked to Non-government environment officials
[ ] Talked to Local government environmental officials
[ ] Talked to a Local Tandayag / Bio-os Fisher or Gleaner [ ] Other ________________
(A) If you did talk about this, can you tell me what was the main thing you discussed?________________
(48) In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about "the consequences of breaking the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary rules & regulations"? If you
have, with whom you have talked to about this.
[ ] Have not talked to anyone [ ] Talked to spouse/partner
[ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws [ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or older
[ ] Talked to
your children aged 15 or younger
[ ] Talked to friend or neighbor
[ ] Talked to village elder or local authority
[ ] Talked to National
government environmental officials
[ ] Talked to Non-government environment officials
[ ] Talked to Local government environmental officials
[ ] Talked to a Local Tandayag / Bio-os Fisher or Gleaner [ ] Other ________________
(A) If you did talk about this, can you tell me what the main thing was you discussed? ________________
(49) In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about "your role in reporting intrusions in the Tandayag/ Bio-os Marine Sanctuaries to the enforcement
team"? If you have, with whom you have talked to about this.
[ ] Have not talked to anyone [ ] Talked to spouse/partner
[ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws [ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or older
[ ] Talked to
your children aged 15 or younger
[ ] Talked to friend or neighbor
[ ] Talked to village elder or local authority
[ ] Talked to National
government environmental officials
[ ] Talked to Non-government environment officials
[ ] Talked to Local government environmental officials
[ ] Talked to a Local Tandayag / Bio-os Fisher or Gleaner [ ] Other ________________
(A) If you did talk about this, can you tell me what the main thing was you discussed? ________________
(50) In the past six months, have you talked to anyone about promoting the idea of the Tandayag MPA? If you have, with whom have you talked to?
[ ] Have not talked to anyone [ ] Talked to a friend or neighbor
[ ] Talked to co-employees
Talked to a Local Tandayag/ Bio-os Fisher or Gleaner
[ ] Other ________________
[ ] Talked to village elder or local authority
[]
(51) In the past six months, have you talked to anyone about promoting the idea of the Bio-os MPA? If you have, with whom have you talked to?
[ ] Have not talked to anyone [ ] Talked to a friend or neighbor
[ ] Talked to co-employees
Talked to a Local Tandayag/ Bio-os Fisher or Gleaner
[ ] Other ________________
[ ] Talked to village elder or local authority
[]
Section 8: Establish Baselines for and Measure Change in Behavior SMART Objectives
105
(52) I am going to read you a list of different types of fishers, and for each one, I would like you to tell me whether you remember seeing someone like that
fishing in this area in the past 6 months (show the NTZ on a map of the area but don't mention whether it is NTZ or not) SHOW MAP LABELLED A
(A) Subsistence fishers from your village: [ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(B) Subsistence fishers from nearby villages: [ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(C) Subsistence fishers from outside areas: [ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(D) Small scale commercial fishers from your village: [ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(E) Small scale commercial fishers from nearby village: [ ] Seen [ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(F) Small scale commercial fishers from outside areas: [ ] Seen [ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(G) Commercial fishers using trawls, ring net, etc : [ ] Seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
[ ] Not seen
(H) Large-scale industrial fishers using large trawls, purse seiner: [ ] Seen [ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(I) Sports / Game fishers targeting Tuna, Bill fish, marlins etc: [ ] Seen [ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(J) Other resource users specializing in target fish such as aquarium fish, mollusks (trochus) and live fish etc
[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(53) I am going to read you a list of different types of fishers, and for each one, I would like you to tell me whether you remember seeing someone like that
fishing in this area in the past 1 year (show an area that is NOT a NTZ on a map of the area but don’t mention whether it is NTZ or not) SHOW MAP LABELLED B
(A) Subsistence fishers from your village: [ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(B) Subsistence fishers from nearby villages: [ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(C) Subsistence fishers from outside areas: [ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(D) Small scale commercial fishers from your village: [ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(E) Small scale commercial fishers from nearby village: [ ] Seen [ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(F) Small scale commercial fishers from outside areas: [ ] Seen [ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(G) Commercial fishers using trawls, ring net, etc:: [ ] Seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
[ ] Not seen
106
(H) Large-scale industrial fishers using large trawls, purse seiner: [ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(I) Sports / Game fishers targeting Tuna, Bill fish, marlins etc: [ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(J) Other resource users specializing in target fish such as aquarium fish, mollusks (trochus) and live fish etc
[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(54) During the past 6 months, would you say that you have been regularly involved, occasionally involved, or not involved with the creation and/or the
management of a no-take fishing area in your local area
(A) [ ] Regularly involved
[ ] Occasionally involved [ ] Never involved
[ ] Don't know /NA
(55) In the past 12 months, have you attended any meeting of the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary Management Committee? [ ] Yes in Tandayag MPA
[ ] Yes in Bio-os MPA [ ] No in Tandayag MPA [ ] No in Bio-os MPA
[ ] NA
(56) In the past 12 months, have you participated in the reef assessment of the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary?
[ ] Yes in Tandayag MPA [ ] Yes in Bio-os MPA
[ ] No in Tandayag MPA [ ] No in Bio-os MPA
[ ] NA
(57) In the past six months, did you agree to a guarding schedule with the MENRO and your team? [ ] Yes
[ ] No
(58) In the past six months, how was the compliance of the Bantay Dagat guarding at the Tandayag/ Bio-os marine sanctuary to the agreed guarding schedule?
[ ] Less than 25% of the Bantay Dagat follow the guarding schedule diligently
[ ] 26%-50% of the Bantay Dagat follow the guarding schedule
the Bantay Dagat follow the guarding schedule [ ] 76%-100% of the Bantay Dagat follow the guarding schedule [ ] N/A
[ ] 51%-75% of
(59) In the past six months, have you participated in any of the activities related to Tandayag MPA?
[ ] Coastal clean-up
[ ] Community meeting [ ] Reporting violations [ ] Other ________________
(60) In the past six months, have you participated in any of the activities related to Bio-os MPA?
[ ] Coastal clean-up
[ ] Community meeting [ ] Reporting violations [ ] Other ________________
(61) In the last six months have you heard of anyone reporting someone breaking the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary rules & regulations to the
enforcement team? : [ ] Yes
[ ] No
(62) If you were to report someone who has broken the rules & regulations of the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary, who would you report them to? [YOU
CAN CHOOSE MORE THAN ONE ANSWER].
107
[ ] Local police [ ] Bantay Dagat Member
[ ] MENRO
[ ] Would Not Report [ ] Other ________________
[ ] Barangay Captain
[ ] Municipal mayor
[ ] Next door neighbor [ ] Husband/Wife.
Section 9: Understand Barriers & Benefits of Behavior Change
(63) What benefits might there be in establishing a Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary Committee ? (Write in one or more answer, None or Don’t Know) :
________________
(64) If you were to encourage a friend to stop intruding in the MPA to fish, what would you suggest would be a good incentive?
[ ] receive public recognition by the Mayor [ ] receive public recognition in the media [ ] be celebrated at a fiesta
you are protecting the food security of the children in the community
[ ] Other ________________
[ ] receive an award
[ ] knowing that
(65) If you were to encourage a friend to take part in the MPA management meetings, what would you suggest to be a good incentive?
[ ] receive public recognition by the Mayor [ ] receive public recognition in the media [ ] be celebrated at a fiesta
you are protecting the food security of the children in the community
[ ] Other ________________
[ ] receive an award
[ ] knowing that
Section 10: Exposure to Campaign Activities & Messages
(66) I am going to ask you about a number of ways in which you may or may not have seen or heard about the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary. For each
method, please tell me whether you remember seeing or hearing that source in the past 6 months.
(A) Tagalog Love Melody: [ ] Yes
[ ] No
(B) Classic Oldies Music: [ ] Yes [ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(C) Traditional Music: [ ] Yes
[ ] Don't know
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(D) Local News: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know
(E) National News:
(F) Sports:
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
[ ] Don't know
(G) Religious Media Program: [ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
108
(H) Talk Show Program: [ ] Yes [ ] No
(I) Drama:
[ ] Yes
(J) Comedy: [ ] Yes
[ ] Don't know
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(K) Puppet Show: [ ] Yes
[ ] No
(L) Locally Produced Video: [ ] Yes
[ ] Don't know
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(M) Poster or Billboard: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know
(N) Printed Booklet: [ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(O) Public Meeting (Festival): [ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(P) sms on your phone: [ ] Yes [ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(67) Of the different ways mentioned above about Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 months, which one, if any, did you think had the most
impact on you? ________________
(68) Of the different ways in which you learned about Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 months, what do you think was the most important
message you learned from them?________________
Section 11: Ground truthing
(69) Please have a look at the 3 photographs labeled A,B,C. Which of the sea creatures shown on the photograph do you like best? [ ] A (napoleon wrasse)
[ ] B (grouper "lapu-lapu")
[ ] C (giant clam)
(70) I am going to read you a number of strategies that might help solve any possible current problems in the management of your local no-take area. For each
strategy, I would like you to tell me if you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree that it would help solve any current problems with managing the
no-take area.
(A) Increased local community involvement in management of the no-take area: [ ] Strong Agree
[ ] Not Sure/Don’t Know
[ ] Agree
(B) Limiting involvement in management of the no-take area to fishers only: [ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D
[ ] NS/DK
[ ] SD
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
(C) Increased and strict law enforcement of the no-take area rules by Police / Navy and Enforcers
109
[ ] SA
[]A
[]D
[ ] SD
[ ] NS/DK
(D) Increased and strict law enforcement of rules by local community fishers with enforcement rights
[ ] SA
[]A
[]D
[ ] SD
[ ] NS/DK
(E) Develop new rules for the no-take area in a process that includes the whole community
[ ] SA
[]A
[]D
[ ] SD
[ ] NS/DK
(F) Change the size and/or the location of the no-take area:
[ ] SA
[]A
[]D
[ ] SD
[ ] NS/DK
(G) Make sure that local fishers have the exclusive right to fish in the areas around the no-take area
[ ] SA
[]A
[]D
[ ] SD
[ ] NS/DK
Additional questions please
A. Question on “ambassador” for social marketing
Among the people I will mention here, who would you trust most if they told you something about the environment?
[ ] Kuya Kim [ ] Chin Chin Guttierez
________________
[ ] Kim Atienza [ ] Cesar Montano
[ ] Antonio Oposa, Jr.
[ ] Richard Guttierez
[ ] Other
B. Additional questions on climate change
1. Do you strongly agree (SA), agree (A), disagree (D), strongly disagree (SD), Not sure/Don’t know (NS/DK) with the following statement:
a. Climate change is not going to cause any problems in my community: ( )SA ( )A
( )D
b. Climate change is already a problem in my community: ( )SA ( ) A
( )NS/DK
( )D
( )SD
( )SD
( )NS/DK
c. Climate change is likely to become a real problem for my community in the coming 5-10 years
( )SA
( )A
( )D
( )SD
( )NS/DK
d. If our local NTZ is well managed it will help buffer some of the effects of climate change in the future
( )SA
( )A
( )D
( )SD
( )NS/DK
110
2. Name up to 3 ways in which you believe climate change could affect your community in the next 5-10 years (DO NOT READ OUT OPTIONS - SELECT UP TO 3)
( ) sea level rise
( )increased water temperature leading death of corals and less fish
( )increase of typhoon frequency,
( ) increase of typhoon strength, less reliable work and crops
( ) more people from the upland will move to the coastal areas in case of crop failure
( ) change in weather patterns
( ) less rain
( )other____
( )N/A
Thank you for all of your help in responding to this anonymous questionnaire survey
ANSWER SHEET
Baseline Survey (2011) and Post-campaign Survey (2012)
You must be at least 15 years old in order to participate in our survey.
111
Participation in this survey is voluntary and you can choose not to answer any individual question or all of the questions. However, your views are important to
us and I hope you will participate.
Respondent agrees to be interviewed (If no, keep tally on separate sheet of paper): [ ] Yes
Section 1: Background information filled in prior to the interview without asking the respondent
Interviewer: __________________________________________
Barangay Tandayag:
[ ] Tandayag Sur
[ ] Tandayag Central
[ ] Tandayag Norte
Barangay Bio-os:
[ ] Buswang
[ ] Cambisay
[ ] Cambajo
[ ] Talay
[ ] Highway
[ ] Sug-ong
[ ] Tabuan
Other barangay:
Enumeration area (EA):
Date (month/day/year):
Survey period:
[ ] Post-campaign (June 2012)
[ ] Pre campaign - Baseline (Feb 2011)
Gender of respondent:
[ ] Male
Sampling methodology:
[ ] random community
of Tandayag
[ ] random community
of Bio-os
[ ] MPA Enforcement
Team
[ ] Amlan-LGU employee
[ ] Female
[ ] fishers of Tandayag
[ ] fishers of Bio-os
112
(1)
[Choose only ONE]:
[ ] You are a fisher at
least 1 time in the past
month near Tandayag
Marine Sanctuary
[ ] You are a fisher at
least 1 time in the past
month in Tandayag
Marine Sanctuary
[ ] You are a gleaner at
least 1 time in the past
month near Tandayag
Marine Sanctuary
[ ] You are a gleaner at
least 1 time in the past
month in Tandayag
Marine Sanctuary
[ ] None of the above
(2)
[Choose only ONE]:
[ ] You are a fisher that
fished at least 1 time in
the past month near the
Bio-os Sanctuary
[ ] You are a fisher that
fished at least 1 time in
the past month in the
Bio-os Sanctuary
[ ] You are a gleaner
that gleaned at least 1
time in the past month
near the Bio-os Marine
Sanctuary
[ ] You are a gleaner
that gleaned at least 1
time in past month in
the Bio-os Marine
Sanctuary
[ ] None of the above
(3)
[Choose only ONE]:
[ ] I live in Tandayag
[ ] I do not live in
Tandayag / Bio-os, but I
live in Amlan
[ ] I live in Bio-os
[ ] I live outside of
Amlan
[ ] Other_____________
(4)
[ ] 14 or younger
[ ] 20 to 24
[ ] 30 to 34
[ ] 40 to 44
[ ] 50 to 54
[ ] 55 or older
[ ] 15 to 19
[ ] 25 to 29
[ ] 35 to 39
[ ] 45 to 49
[Choose only ONE]:
[ ] Not completed any
education
[ ] High school level not
completed
[ ] Completed high
school
[ ] College level
completed
[ ] Completed four-year
course
[ ] Elementary level not
completed
[ ] Completed
elementary
[ ] College level not
completed
[ ] Completed two-year
course
[ ] Refused to answer
[ ] Roman catholic
[ ] Jehova's Witness
[ ] Protestant
[ ] Local/traditional
[ ] None
[ ] Iglesia Ni Kristo
[ ] Muslim
[ ] Jewish
[ ] Refuses to answer
[ ] Other ____________
[ ] Agriculture
[ ] Small business (shop
keeper or sales person)
[ ] Professional
(Lawyer, Health care
[ ] housework
[ ] student
[ ] Not currently
[ ] government (local)
(5)
(6)
(7)
[Choose ONE
only]:
[Choose ONE only]:
[ ] government (state or
113
national)
[ ] Artisan (crafts)
employed
[ ] other private
company
[ ] Transportation
(shipping, trucking,
rail)
[ ] non-government
organization
[ ] self- employed
[ ] N/A
[ ] housework
[ ] student
[ ] Not currently
employed
[ ] other private
company
[ ] government (local)
[ ] non-government
organization
[ ] self- employed
[ ] N/A
[ ] Spear fishing
[ ] Other ____________
[ ] Fishing
[ ] Office work
provider)
[ ] Gleaning
[ ] Factory or
manufacturing
[ ] Logging, mining,
other extractive
industry
[ ] Food preparation or
restaurant
[ ] Other ____________
[ ] Education
(8)
[Choose ONE only]:
[ ] Agriculture
[ ] Fishing
[ ] Gleaning
[ ] Logging, mining,
other extractive
industry
[ ] Small business (shop
keeper or sales person)
[ ] Office work
[ ] Factory or
manufacturing
[ ] Food preparation or
restaurant
[ ] Professional
(Lawyer, Health care
provider)
[ ] Artisan (crafts)
[ ] Transportation
(shipping, trucking,
rail)
[ ] government (state or
national)
[ ] Other ____________
[ ] Education
(9)
[You can give more
than one answer]
[ ] Gill net
[ ] Fish trap
[ ] Hook and Line
[ ] NA
(10) [ ] Former Bantay
Dagat Member
[ ] Current Bantay Dagat
Member
[ ] Former Fishermen
Association member
[ ] Current Fishermen
Association member
[ ] NA
(11) [ ] 1 (me)
[]3
[]5
[]8
[ ] 10
[ ] More than 10
[]2
[]4
[]7
[]9
[ ] Between 30,000 and
50,000
[ ] Between 50,001 and
75,000
[ ] Between 75,001 and
100,000
[ ] Greater than 100,000
Pesos
[ ] Not sure
(12) [ ] Below 30,000
Pesos
[ ] Refused
114
(13)
[ ] 0%
[ ] 1-20%
[ ] 21-40%
[ ] 41-60%
[ ] 61-80%
[ ] 81- 100%
(14)
[ ] 0%
[ ] 1-20%
[ ] 21-40%
[ ] 41-60%
[ ] 61-80%
[ ] 81- 100%
(15) Answer options: "Most trustworthy, Very trustworthy, Somewhat trustworthy, or Not trustworthy.
(A) Person on the
radio:
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat
trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
(B) Kuya Kim:
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat
trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
(C) National
government
environment officials:
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat
trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
(D) Local government
environment officials:
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat
trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
(E) Religious leaders:
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat
trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
(F) Friends or family
members:
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat
trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
(G) Teachers:
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat
trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
(H) Scientist:
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat
trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
(I) Information on
poster or billboard:
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat
trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
115
(J) Information in
printed booklet:
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat
trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
(K) Information from
puppet show:
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat
trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
(L) Information from
public meeting:
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat
trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
(M) Conservation
group volunteer:
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat
trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
(N) Non-government
organization
environmental officials:
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat
trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
(O) Local Community
Leaders:
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat
trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
(P) Bantay Dagat:
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat
trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
(Q) MENRO staff:
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat
trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
(R) Barangay Captain:
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat
trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
(S) Information
received via sms on
your phone:
[ ] Most trustworthy
[ ] Very trustworthy
[ ] Somewhat
trustworthy
[ ] Not Trustworthy
[ ] Not sure/Don't know
(T) Most trusted?
[ ] person on radio
[ ] local government
environment official
[ ] Teachers
[ ] information from
public meeting or
festival
[ ] Barangay Captain
[ ] person on television
[ ] law enforcement
official
[ ] national government
[ ] local community
leaders
[ ] Religious Leaders
[ ] information on poster
or billboard
[ ] conservation group
[ ] information in printed
volunteer
booklet
[ ] MPA Manager
[ ] Bantay Dagat
[ ] Other ___________
116
environment official
[ ] friends or family
members
[ ] information from
puppet show
[ ] Non-government
environmental officials
[ ] N/A
(16) [Choose only ONE]. If you don't watch them at all, select Don't watch. If other local stations, specify which one. [If don't watch go straight to question 17]
[ ] ABS-CBN, Dumaguete [ ] Fil Products [ ] Local Sky Cable
(A) [ ] Never
[ ] Up to 3 days per week
[ ] Don't watch [ ] Other ________________
[ ] N/A
[ ] 4 to 6 days per week [ ] daily
(B) Please indicate up to 2 times during the day when you are most likely to watch.
[ ] Before 6:00 a.m.
[ ] 6:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
[ ] 10:01 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
10:00 p.m.
[ ] No particular time [ ] Off and on all day
[ ] Don't know
[ ] 2:01 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
[ ] Don't watch/listen
[ ] 6:01 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. [ ] After
(C) Please indicate up to 2 times during the day when you are most likely to watch.
[ ] Before 6:00 a.m.
[ ] 6:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
[ ] 10:01 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
[ ] 2:01 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
10:00 p.m.
[ ] No particular time [ ] Off and on all day
[ ] Don't know [ ] Don't watch/listen
[ ] 6:01 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
[ ] After
(17) [Choose only one]. If respondent does not listen to radio, select Don't listen and go straight to question 18. If other local stations specify.
[ ] DYWC
[ ] Love Radio
[ ] Power 91
(18) [ ] Never [ ] Up to 3 days per week
[ ] DYEM FM
[ ] Bombo Radio[ ] Don't listen to the radio
[ ] Other ________________
[ ] N/A
[ ] 4 to 6 days per week [ ] daily
(A) [ ] Local music
[ ] International music [ ] News
[ ] Don't listen to radio [ ] Other ________________
[ ] Sports
[ ] Radio program
[ ] Dramas
(B) Please indicate up to TWO times during the day when you are most likely to listen.
[ ] Before 6:00 a.m.
[ ] 6:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
[ ] 10:01 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
[ ] 2:01 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
10:00 p.m.
[ ] No particular time [ ] Off and on all day
[ ] Don't know [ ] Don't watch/listen
[ ] Religious
[ ] No favorite
[ ] 6:01 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
[ ] After
(C) Please indicate up to TWO times during the day when you are likely to listen.
117
[ ] Before 6:00 a.m.
[ ] 6:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
[ ] 10:01 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
[ ] 2:01 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
10:00 p.m.
[ ] No particular time [ ] Off and on all day
[ ] Don't know [ ] Don't watch/listen
[ ] 6:01 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
[ ] After
(19) Please tell me up to THREE publications that you read most often.
[ ] Daily Enquirer [ ] Negros Chronicle
[ ] Manila Bulletin
[ ] Don't read
[ ] Other ________________
[ ] N/A
(20)
(A)
Tagalog Love Melodies:
[ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(B)
Classic Oldies Music:
[ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(C)
Traditional Music:
[ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(D)
Local news:
[ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(E)
Badminton:
[ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(F)
Tennis:
[ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(G)
Biking:
[ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(H)
Basketball:
[ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(I)
Religious programs:
[ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(J)
Miss Dreamland:
[ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(L)
Concert:
[ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(M)
Los Companeros:
[ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(N)
Puppet shows:
[ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(O)
Internet (YouTube and Websites):
[ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(P)
www.amlan.gov.ph:
[ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(Q)
Open-air video showing:
[ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(R)
Radio program:
[ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
118
(S)
Fluvial Parade:
[ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(T)
Budyas Festival:
[ ] Like the most
[ ] Like a lot
[ ] Like a little
[ ] Not liked
(U) What other types of media programs do you like to watch, listen to, or read about? __________________________
(21) [name up to THREE]: [ ] a____________
[ ] b____________
[ ] c__________ [ ] Other ____________ [ ] N/A
(22) (Choose only ONE): [ ] yes I glean [ ] yes I fish [ ] yes I glean and fish
[ ] no I don't glean and don't fish
[ ] N/A
(23) (If respondent said no I don't fish in question 22 then don't ask question and select "behavior is not relevant to this respondent")
[ ] I have never considered to stop fishing in Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary.
[ ] I have considered to stop fishing in Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary but do not want to stop doing so
[ ] I intend to stop fishing in Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the next 6 months but have not done so yet
[ ] I have talked to someone about stopping fishing in Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 months.
[ ] I have only gone fishing in the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary a few times in the past 6 months
[ ] I have not fished in the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 months
[ ] Behavior is not relevant for this respondent
(24) (If respondent said no I don't glean in question 22 then don't ask question and select "behavior is not relevant to this respondent")
[ ] I have never considered to stop gleaning in Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary
[ ] I have considered to stop gleaning but do not want to stop doing so
[ ] I intend to stop fishing in Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the next 6 months but have not done so yet
[ ] I have talked to someone about stopping the gleaning in Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 months
Tandayag/ Bio-os Marine Sanctuary a few times in the past 6 months
[ ] I have not gleaned in the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 months
[ ] Behavior is not relevant for this respondent
[ ] I have only gone gleaning in the
(25) [ ] I have never considered following the regulations of Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary
[ ] I have considered following the regulations of Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary but don't want to do so
[ ] I intend to follow the regulations of Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the next 6 months
[ ] I have talked to someone about following the regulations of the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 months.
[ ] I often follow the regulations of Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary but not at all times.
[ ] I have always followed the regulations of Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in the past 12 months.
[ ] Behavior not relevant to this respondent
119
(26) [ ] I have never considered attending meetings for Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary Management
[ ] I have considered attending
meetings for Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary Management, but don't want to do it [ ] I intend to attend meetings for Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary
Management in the next 6 months but have not done so yet
[ ] I have talked to someone about attending meetings of Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary Management in the last 12 months.
[ ] I have attended at least 1 meetings for Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary Management in the last 12 months.
[ ] I have attended at least 6 meetings for Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary Management in the last 12 months.
[ ] Behavior is not relevant for this respondent
(27) A. [ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure
D. [ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure
G. [ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure
B. [ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure
E. [ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure
C. [ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure
F. [ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure
(28) (A) (If respondent answers YES then please also ask next question) [ ] Yes [ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(B) (Ask only of those who said yes to previous question) You can tell me up to 3 that you know. (Do NOT read out answers but tick as appropriate or add to
other)
[ ] more fish
[ ] area for fish to reproduce
[ ] bigger fish [ ] bigger or better coral / habitat for fish
[ ] more fertile fish
[ ] bank of the
sea / food security
[ ] better regulation/management of fishing activities [ ] no more destructive fishing in that area
[ ] community ownership
[ ] new skills
[ ] better/new access to tourism [ ] better community cohesion [ ] Other ________________ [ ] N/A
(29) (A) National Government officials: [ ] Regularly
[ ] occasionally
[ ] Never [ ] Not sure/ Don't know
(B) Local Government officials: [ ] Regularly [ ] occasionally [ ] Never
[ ] Not sure/ Don't know
(C) Local leaders: [ ] Regularly [ ] occasionally [ ] Never
[ ] Not sure/ Don't know
(D) Local fishers: [ ] Regularly [ ] occasionally [ ] Never
[ ] Not sure/ Don't know
(30) (A) National Government officials: [ ] Most involved [ ] Involved [ ] Not involved [ ] Not sure / Don't know
(B) Local Government officials: [ ] Most involved
[ ] Involved
[ ] Not involved [ ] Not sure / Don't know
(C) Scientists and/or fisheries experts: [ ] Most involved [ ] Involved
[ ] Not involved [ ] Not sure / Don't know
(D) Local leaders: [ ] Most involved
[ ] Involved
[ ] Not involved [ ] Not sure / Don't know
(E) Local fishers: [ ] Most involved
[ ] Involved
[ ] Not involved [ ] Not sure / Don't know
(31) (A) Fish will be scared out of the sanctuary and into the fishing nets
[ ] Strongly Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
(B) Fish catch will continue to decline: [ ] Strongly Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
(C) Illegal fishers from outside will be encouraged to come in and fish within Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary
[ ] Strongly Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
120
(D) The corals begin to die when the fish are taken away: [ ] Strongly Agree [ ] Agree [ ] Disagree [ ] Strongly Disagree
(E) The local community will be poorer and less united: [ ] Strongly Agree [ ] Agree [ ] Disagree [ ] Strongly Disagree
(F) Fishers will catch more fish: [ ] Strongly Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
(32) (A) Only members of the Fishermen's Association are involved in the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary management: [ ] Strongly Agree [ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
(B) No-one knows who is managing the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary:[ ] SA
[ ] Agree [ ] D [ ] SD
(C) Local Residents know who and what time the guarding takes place and so are able to enter Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary when the guards are not
there: [ ] SA [ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
(D) The 24/7 guard system is crucial to secure the benefits of the Tandayag/ Bio-os Marine Sanctuaries
[ ] Strongly Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
(E) There is no patrol boat to chase after the illegal fishers, so the illegal fishers just come and ignore the rules knowing they won't be caught: [ ] Strongly Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
(F) Only men are involved in Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary, so the interests and concerns of women or youth are ignored: [ ] Strongly Agree
Agree [ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
(G) The Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary regulations need to be followed by all people who go into the sanctuary.
[ ] Strongly Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
(33) [ ] I am indifferent to its presence [ ] am very proud of it [ ] I view it negatively [ ] I like it [ ] I am against it [ ] N/A
(34) [ ] I am indifferent to its presence [ ] am very proud of it [ ] I view it negatively [ ] I like it [ ] I am against it [ ] N/A
(35) [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
(36) [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
[]
(37) [ ] Strongly do not support the increase in enforcement
[ ] Do not support the increase in enforcement [ ] Support the increase in enforcement [ ]
Strongly support the increase in enforcement
[ ] Unsure
(38) [ ] Too Big [ ] Too Small [ ] Just the right size
[ ] Unsure
(39) [ ] In the right place
[ ] In the wrong place [ ] Unsure
(40) (CHOOSE ONE ONLY): [ ] Coastguard
[ ] Fishers/Gleaners
[ ] Barangay Council
[ ] Members of the Fishermen's Association
[ ] N/A
[ ] N/A
[ ] Bantay Dagat (licensed enforcers)
[ ] Other ________________
(41) (Choose one only): [ ] Community members [ ] Fishers/Gleaners [ ] National Police [ ] Non-government officials
[ ] Bio-os Barangay Council
[ ] Local Government officials [ ] National government officials[ ] Private sector
MENRO [ ] Other ________________
[ ] MENRO
[ ] National Police
[ ] Tandayag Barangay Council
[ ] Academic Sector
[]
121
(42) [ ] Decreased
(43) [ ] Northern part
[ ] Increased
[ ] Stayed the Same
[ ] N/A
[ ] Southern part
[ ] towards the sea
[ ] around the MPA
[ ] Not at all
[ ] N/A
(44)
(A) Attend at least 6 of the 12 management meetings of the Tandayag / Bio-os
Marine Sanctuary
[ ] Easy
[ ] Difficult
[ ] Not sure
[ ] Not Applicable
[ ] Easy
[ ] Difficult
[ ] Not sure
[ ] Not Applicable
[ ] Easy
[ ] Easy
[ ] Easy
[ ] Difficult
[ ] Difficult
[ ] Difficult
[ ] Not sure
[ ] Not sure
[ ] Not sure
[ ] Not Applicable
[ ] Not Applicable
[ ] Not Applicable
(B) Reporting an intruder of Tandayag/ Bio-os Marine Sanctuary to the
enforcement team
(C) Run a Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary Committee every month:
(D) Participate in coastal clean-up activity once a year:
(E) Participate in reef/ MPA monitoring once a year:
(45)
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(G)
(H)
(I)
(J)
(K)
(L)
(M)
(N)
(46)
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
] Strongly Agree
] Strongly Agree
] Strongly Agree
] Strongly Agree
] Strongly Agree
] Strongly Agree
] Strongly Agree
] Strongly Agree
] Strongly Agree
] Strongly Agree
] Strongly Agree
] Strongly Agree
] Strongly Agree
] Strongly Agree
[ ] Have not talked to anyone
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
] Agree
] Agree
] Agree
] Agree
] Agree
] Agree
] Agree
] Agree
] Agree
] Agree
] Agree
] Agree
] Agree
] Agree
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
] Disagree
] Disagree
] Disagree
] Disagree
] Disagree
] Disagree
] Disagree
] Disagree
] Disagree
] Disagree
] Disagree
] Disagree
] Disagree
] Disagree
[ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
] Strongly Disagree
] Strongly Disagree
] Strongly Disagree
] Strongly Disagree
] Strongly Disagree
] Strongly Disagree
] Strongly Disagree
] Strongly Disagree
] Strongly Disagree
] Strongly Disagree
] Strongly Disagree
] Strongly Disagree
] Strongly Disagree
] Strongly Disagree
[ ] Talked to village elder or local
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
] Not Sure/ Don’t Know
] Not Sure/ Don’t Know
] Not Sure/ Don’t Know
] Not Sure/ Don’t Know
] Not Sure/ Don’t Know
] Not Sure/ Don’t Know
] Not Sure/ Don’t Know
] Not Sure/ Don’t Know
] Not Sure/ Don’t Know
] Not Sure/ Don’t Know
] Not Sure/ Don’t Know
] Not Sure/ Don’t Know
] Not Sure/ Don’t Know
] Not Sure/ Don’t Know
[ ] Talked to Local government
122
older
authority
environmental officials
[ ] Talked to spouse/partner
[ ] Talked to your children aged 15 or
younger
[ ] Talked to National government
environmental officials
[ ] Talked to a Local Tandayag /
Bio-os Fisher or Gleaner
[ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws
[ ] Talked to friend or neighbor
[ ] Talked to Non-government
environment officials
[ ] Other ________________
(A) ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(47)
[ ] Have not talked to anyone
[ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or
older
[ ] Talked to village elder or local
authority
[ ] Talked to Local government
environmental officials
[ ] Talked to spouse/partner
[ ] Talked to your children aged 15 or
younger
[ ] Talked to National government
environmental officials
[ ] Talked to a Local Tandayag /
Bio-os Fisher or Gleaner
[ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws
[ ] Talked to friend or neighbor
[ ] Talked to Non-government
environment officials
[ ] Other ________________
(A) ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(48)
[ ] Have not talked to anyone
[ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or
older
[ ] Talked to village elder or local
authority
[ ] Talked to Local government
environmental officials
123
[ ] Talked to spouse/partner
[ ] Talked to your children aged 15 or
younger
[ ] Talked to National government
environmental officials
[ ] Talked to a Local Tandayag /
Bio-os Fisher or Gleaner
[ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws
[ ] Talked to friend or neighbor
[ ] Talked to Non-government
environment officials
[ ] Other ________________
(A) ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(49)
[ ] Have not talked to anyone
[ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or
older
[ ] Talked to village elder or local
authority
[ ] Talked to Local government
environmental officials
[ ] Talked to spouse/partner
[ ] Talked to your children aged 15 or
younger
[ ] Talked to National government
environmental officials
[ ] Talked to a Local Tandayag /
Bio-os Fisher or Gleaner
[ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws
[ ] Talked to friend or neighbor
[ ] Talked to Non-government
environment officials
[ ] Other ________________
(A) ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(50)
[ ] Have not talked to
anyone
[ ] Talked to a friend or
neighbor
[ ] Talked to coemployees
[ ] Talked to village elder [ ] Talked to a Local
or local authority
Tandayag/ Bio-os
Fisher or Gleaner
[ ] Other ________
(51)
[ ] Have not talked to
anyone
[ ] Talked to a friend or
neighbor
[ ] Talked to coemployees
[ ] Talked to village elder [ ] Talked to a Local
or local authority
Tandayag/ Bio-os
[ ] Other ________
124
Fisher or Gleaner
(52) SHOW MAP LABELLED A:
(A) Subsistence fishers from your village:
[ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(B) Subsistence fishers from nearby villages:
[ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(C) Subsistence fishers from outside areas:
[ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(D) Small scale commercial fishers from your village:
[ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(E) Small scale commercial fishers from nearby village:
[ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(F) Small scale commercial fishers from outside areas:
[ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(G) Commercial fishers using trawls, ring net, etc :
[ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(H) Large-scale industrial fishers using large trawls,
purse seiner:
[ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(I) Sports / Game fishers targeting Tuna, Bill fish,
marlins etc:
[ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(J) Other resource users specializing in target fish such
as aquarium fish, mollusks (trochus) and live fish etc
[ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(A) Subsistence fishers from your village:
[ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(B) Subsistence fishers from nearby villages:
[ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(C) Subsistence fishers from outside areas:
[ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(D) Small scale commercial fishers from your village:
[ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(53) SHOW MAP LABELLED B:
125
(E) Small scale commercial fishers from nearby village:
[ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(F) Small scale commercial fishers from outside areas:
[ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(G) Commercial fishers using trawls, ring net, etc :
[ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(H) Large-scale industrial fishers using large trawls,
purse seiner:
[ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(I) Sports / Game fishers targeting Tuna, Bill fish,
marlins etc:
[ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(J) Other resource users specializing in target fish such
as aquarium fish, mollusks (trochus) and live fish etc
[ ] Seen
[ ] Not seen
[ ] Not sure / Don't remember
(54)
(55)
(A) [ ] Regularly involved
[ ] Yes in Tandayag MPA
[ ] Occasionally involved
[ ] Yes in Bio-os MPA
[ ] Never involved
[ ] No in Tandayag MPA
(56)
[ ] Yes in Tandayag MPA
[ ] Yes in Bio-os MPA
[ ] No in Tandayag MPA
(57)
(58)
[ ] Yes
[ ] Less than 25% of the Bantay Dagat follow the
guarding schedule diligently
[ ] No
[ ] 51%-75% of the Bantay Dagat
follow the guarding schedule
[ ] Don't know /NA
[ ] No in Bio-os MPA
[ ] NA
[ ] No in Bio-os MPA
[ ] NA
[ ] 76%-100% of the Bantay
Dagat follow the guarding
schedule
[ ] N/A
[ ] Reporting violations
[ ] Reporting violations
[ ] Other ________________
[ ] Other ________________
[ ] Barangay Captain
[ ] Municipal Mayor
[ ] Next door neighbor
[ ] Husband/Wife
[ ] Would Not Report
[ ] Other ________________
[ ] 26%-50% of the Bantay Dagat follow the
guarding schedule
(59)
(60)
(61)
(62)
[ ] Coastal clean-up
[ ] Coastal clean-up
[ ] Yes
[YOU CAN CHOOSE MORE THAN ONE ANSWER].
[ ] Community meeting
[ ] Community meeting
[ ] No
[ ] Local police
[ ] Bantay Dagat Member
[ ] MENRO
126
(63)
(64)
[ ] receive public recognition by the
Mayor
[ ] receive public
recognition in the
media
[ ] be celebrated at a
fiesta
[ ] receive an award
(65)
[ ] receive public recognition by the
Mayor
[ ] receive public
recognition in the
media
[ ] be celebrated at a
fiesta
[ ] receive an award
[ ] knowing that you
are protecting the
food security of the
children in the
community
[ ] knowing that you
are protecting the
food security of the
children in the
community
[ ] Other ________
[ ] Other ________
(66)
(A) Tagalog Love Melody:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(B) Classic Oldies Music:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(C) Traditional Music:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(D) Local News:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(E) National News:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(F) Sports:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(G) Religious Media Program:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(H) Talk Show Program:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
127
(I) Drama:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(J) Comedy:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(K) Puppet Show:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(L) Locally Produced Video:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(M) Poster or Billboard:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(N) Printed Booklet:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(O) Public Meeting (Festival):
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(P) sms on your phone:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
(67) ______________________________________________________________________________
(68) ________________________________________________________________________________
(69) [ ] A (napoleon wrasse)
[ ] B (grouper "lapu-lapu")
[ ] C (giant clam)
(70)
(A) Increased local community involvement in management of the notake area:
[ ] Strong
Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly
Disagree
[ ] Not Sure/
Don’t Know
(B) Limiting involvement in management of the no-take area to fishers
only:
[ ] Strong
Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly
Disagree
[ ] Not Sure/
Don’t Know
(C) Increased and strict law enforcement of the no-take area rules by
Police / Navy and Enforcers:
[ ] Strong
Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly
Disagree
[ ] Not Sure/
Don’t Know
(D) Increased and strict law enforcement of rules by local community
fishers with enforcement rights:
[ ] Strong
Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly
Disagree
[ ] Not Sure/
Don’t Know
(E) Develop new rules for the no-take area in a process that includes
the whole community:
[ ] Strong
Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly
Disagree
[ ] Not Sure/
Don’t Know
128
(F) Change the size and/or the location of the no-take area:
[ ] Strong
Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly
Disagree
[ ] Not Sure/
Don’t Know
(G) Make sure that local fishers have the exclusive right to fish in the
areas around the no-take area:
[ ] Strong
Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly
Disagree
[ ] Not Sure/
Don’t Know
A. Question on “Ambassador” for Social Marketing
Among the people I will mention here, who would you trust most if they told you something about the environment?
[ ] Kuya Kim
[ ] Chin Chin
Guttierez
[ ] Kim Atienza
[ ] Cesar Montano
[ ] Antonio Oposa,
Jr.
[ ] Richard Guttierez
[ ] Other
________________
B. Additional Questions on Climate Change
1. Do you strongly agree (SA), agree (A), disagree (D), strongly disagree (SD), Not sure/Don’t know (NS/DK) with the following statement
a. Climate change is not going to cause any problems in
my community:
[ ] Strong Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
[ ] Not Sure/ Don’t
Know
b. Climate change is already a problem in my
community:
[ ] Strong Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
[ ] Not Sure/ Don’t
Know
c. Climate change is likely to become a real problem for
my community in the coming 5-10 years
[ ] Strong Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
[ ] Not Sure/ Don’t
Know
d. If our local NTZ is well managed it will help buffer
some of the effects of climate change in the future
[ ] Strong Agree
[ ] Agree
[ ] Disagree
[ ] Strongly Disagree
[ ] Not Sure/ Don’t
Know
2. Name up to 3 ways in which you believe climate change could affect your community in the next 5-10 years (DO NOT READ OUT OPTIONS - SELECT UP TO 3)
( ) sea level rise
129
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
) increased water temperature leading death of corals and less fish
) increase of typhoon frequency,
) increase of typhoon strength, less reliable work and crops
) more people from the upland will move to the coastal areas in case of crop failure
) change in weather patterns
) less rain
) Other____
) N/A
Thank you for all of your help in responding to this anonymous questionnaire survey
130
131
132
133
134
4. Survey results
Table 1 & 2: Independent Variables to Access Comparability of the Survey
Residents of respondents
Barangay Tandayag / Bio-os
Tandayag Sur
Tandayag Central
26.0%; 241
10.7%; 99
Tandayag Norte
20.0%; 186
Buswang
12.3%; 114
Cambisay
0.5%; 5
Cambajo
4.6%; 43
Sug-ong
5.6%; 52
Tabuan
2.9%; 27
Talay
5.7%; 53
Salama
3.4%; 32
BayBay
1.4%; 13
Highway
6.8%; 63
Totals
100.0%; 928
Age distribution of Target Audiences
(4) How old are you?
15 to 19
2.8%; 31
20 to 24
5.8%; 63
25 to 29
9.7%; 106
30 to 34
11.5%; 125
135
35 to 39
12.4%; 135
40 to 44
11.1%; 121
45 to 49
13.9%; 152
50 to 54
12.8%; 140
55 or older
19.1%; 208
Refused to answer
0.3%; 3
Other
0.1%; 1
Not Applicable
0.5%; 5
Totals
100.0%; 1090
Level of Education of
Target Audiences
(5) School
Not completed any education
2.5%; 27
Elementary level not completed
16.5%; 180
High school level not completed
17.3%; 189
Completed elementary
18.0%; 196
Completed high school
17.9%; 195
College level not completed
11.7%; 127
College level completed
6.6%; 72
Completed two-year course
1.9%; 21
Completed four-year course
5.5%; 60
Refused to answer
1.0%; 11
Not Applicable
1.1%; 12
Totals
100.0%; 1090
Religion
(6) Religion
92.3%; 1005
136
Roman Catholic
Iglesia Ni Kristo
0.6%; 7
Jehova's Witness
0.6%; 7
Muslim
0.2%; 2
Protestant
1.5%; 16
Mormons
0.4%; 4
Born Again
0.7%; 8
Baptist
0.4%; 4
Refuses to answer
0.5%; 5
Adventist
0.2%; 2
Corner Stone
0.2%; 2
UCCP
0.2%; 2
Other
0.4%; 4
Not Applicable
Totals
1.9%; 21
100.0%; 1089
137
Source: Data in Table 1 and 2 is based on interviews with 1,090 respondents in the pre-campaign survey. In some cases, the number may not sum up
to 100% due to rounding of decimal points or because not all response are shown for some variables.
Residency of Respondents
About 49% of respondents live in Tandayag and 41% in
Bio-os. Only 9% of respondents neither live in
Tandayag nor Bio-os, but within the Municipality of
Amlan.
138
Family Income
Approximately 27% of the respondents have an
estimated total annual income of below Thirty Thousand
Pesos (<P30,000) per household. This is a very critical
question as this would help us understand our target
audiences economic status that could affect their
participation in any MPA-related activities.
Employment
(7) What is your primary occupation or sector in which you work? [choose ONE only]
Agriculture/ Farming
Fishing
Gleaning
Small business (shop keeper/ sales person)
2.9%; 31
23.3%; 253
0.4%; 4
9.3%; 101
Office work
1.2%; 13
Food preparation (restaurant, bakery)
1.1%; 12
Professional (Lawyer, Health care provider)
0.9%; 10
Artisan (crafts)
Transportation (driver )
Education
Housework
0.2%; 2
2.1%; 23
0.6%; 7
22.7%; 246
Student
2.5%; 27
Not currently employed
7.5%; 81
Other private company
3.5%; 38
139
Non-governmental organization
Self employed (own a store, tailor)
Government (Municipal, Barangay)
0.4%; 4
5.2%; 56
10.6%; 115
Government (state or national)
0.7%; 8
Construction work/ Carpentry
3.0%; 33
Other
0.2%; 2
Other
0.3%; 3
Not Applicable
Totals
1.6%; 17
100.0%; 1086
Trusted Sources
“Information from a credible source influences beliefs, opinions, attitudes and/or behavior through internalization. Once the receiver internalizes
the opinion or attitude it becomes integrated into his or her belief system. This belief may be maintained even after the source of message is
forgotten. A highly credible communicator is particularly important when message recipients have a negative position toward the product, service
or issue being promoted, because the credible source is likely to inhibit counter-arguments” (Sadowsky). Peers, community leaders, religious
leaders, recognized “experts” are all often such trusted sources. Within the media it appears that the trustworthiness of people the Barangay
Captain, the MENRO and the Bantay Dagat are the most or very trustworthy source of environmental information. The information from a public
meeting was relatively low for Tandayag fishers. This could mean that the campaign will focus on other ways to get the involvement of the fishers
in Tandayag MPA management. For Bio-os fishers and community, the non-government organization (NGO) was low. Thus, the campaign could
focus on increasing the level of trust for NGO to help them improve in MPA management.
Table 3: Trusted Sources of Environmental Information
140
Sampling methodology
Source of Information & Level of Trustworthiness
Random
Community of
Tandayag
Random
Amlan-LGU
Community of
Employee
Bio-os
Fishers of
Tandayag
Fishers of
Bio-os
MPA
Enforcement
Team
(A) Person on the radio
Most or very trustworthy
56.7%
30.7%
34.7%
41.7%
53.5%
59.3%
Somewhat or not trustworthy
33.9%
56.4%
52.1%
55.0%
38.0%
37.0%
9.4%
12.9%
13.2%
3.3%
8.5%
3.7%
Most or very trustworthy
62.2%
54.2%
50.3%
48.3%
61.1%
67.3%
Somewhat or not trustworthy
30.4%
39.1%
37.8%
49.2%
30.6%
20.0%
7.4%
6.7%
11.9%
2.5%
8.3%
12.7%
Most or very trustworthy
65.8%
27.5%
41.7%
66.1%
41.7%
65.5%
Somewhat or not trustworthy
26.5%
62.3%
44.4%
32.2%
52.8%
29.1%
7.7%
10.1%
13.9%
1.7%
5.6%
5.5%
Most or very trustworthy
72.0%
34.1%
52.8%
68.3%
61.1%
85.2%
Somewhat or not trustworthy
20.6%
59.0%
36.8%
28.3%
33.3%
9.3%
7.4%
6.9%
10.4%
3.3%
5.6%
5.6%
Most or very trustworthy
37.4%
56.8%
41.7%
40.3%
43.1%
58.2%
Somewhat or not trustworthy
56.9%
40.6%
49.3%
58.0%
54.2%
38.2%
5.7%
2.6%
9.0%
1.7%
2.8%
3.6%
Most or very trustworthy
50.7%
39.0%
54.9%
44.2%
68.1%
63.6%
Somewhat or not trustworthy
46.4%
54.0%
37.5%
55.8%
25.0%
34.5%
2.8%
6.9%
7.6%
0.0%
6.9%
1.8%
Not sure/Don't know
(B) Kuya Kim
Not sure/Don't know
(C) National government environment officials
Not sure/Don't know
(D) Local government environment officials
Not sure/Don't know
(E) Religious leaders
Not sure/Don't know
(F) Friends or family members
Not sure/Don't know
141
(G) Teachers
Most or very trustworthy
52.7%
42.2%
40.6%
37.0%
43.1%
58.2%
Somewhat or not trustworthy
41.0%
53.2%
48.3%
61.3%
52.8%
38.2%
6.3%
4.6%
11.2%
1.7%
4.2%
3.6%
Most or very trustworthy
38.6%
41.6%
51.7%
47.9%
43.7%
46.3%
Somewhat or not trustworthy
40.3%
50.9%
29.4%
46.2%
47.9%
16.7%
Not sure/Don't know
21.0%
7.6%
18.9%
5.9%
8.5%
37.0%
Most or very trustworthy
54.6%
25.3%
46.8%
40.8%
51.4%
65.5%
Somewhat or not trustworthy
33.6%
64.8%
39.0%
52.5%
36.1%
27.3%
Not sure/Don't know
11.8%
9.9%
14.2%
6.7%
12.5%
7.3%
Most or very trustworthy
59.4%
40.9%
45.1%
39.5%
45.8%
69.1%
Somewhat or not trustworthy
32.6%
51.6%
45.8%
55.5%
51.4%
27.3%
8.1%
7.5%
9.2%
5.0%
2.8%
3.6%
Most or very trustworthy
21.2%
3.8%
13.5%
12.7%
10.0%
16.7%
Somewhat or not trustworthy
52.7%
63.6%
51.8%
72.9%
68.6%
40.7%
Not sure/Don't know
26.1%
32.6%
34.8%
14.4%
21.4%
42.6%
Most or very trustworthy
50.7%
47.4%
43.6%
39.0%
66.2%
63.6%
Somewhat or not trustworthy
37.5%
46.0%
50.0%
57.6%
28.2%
27.3%
Not sure/Don't know
11.8%
6.6%
6.4%
3.4%
5.6%
9.1%
Most or very trustworthy
66.5%
27.2%
44.7%
46.2%
53.5%
59.3%
Somewhat or not trustworthy
26.0%
62.1%
43.3%
48.7%
43.7%
27.8%
Not sure/Don't know
(H) Scientist
(I) Information on poster or billboard
(J) Information in printed booklet
Not sure/Don't know
(K) Information from puppet show
(L) Information from public meeting
(M) Conservation group volunteer
142
Not sure/Don't know
7.5%
10.7%
12.1%
5.0%
2.8%
13.0%
Environmental officials
Most or very trustworthy
55.8%
14.7%
43.3%
41.9%
16.7%
54.5%
Somewhat or not trustworthy
33.8%
67.9%
41.1%
52.1%
56.9%
36.4%
Not sure/Don't know
10.4%
17.3%
15.6%
6.0%
26.4%
9.1%
Most or very trustworthy
47.8%
23.6%
35.9%
44.1%
44.9%
64.8%
Somewhat or not trustworthy
42.1%
71.4%
54.9%
52.5%
43.5%
29.6%
Not sure/Don't know
10.1%
5.0%
9.2%
3.4%
11.6%
5.6%
Most or very trustworthy
41.4%
45.8%
32.2%
73.1%
51.4%
74.5%
Somewhat or not trustworthy
51.4%
48.1%
56.6%
23.5%
43.1%
21.8%
7.2%
6.1%
11.2%
3.4%
5.6%
3.6%
Most or very trustworthy
61.2%
57.1%
46.2%
64.7%
72.9%
80.0%
Somewhat or not trustworthy
31.9%
39.4%
44.8%
32.8%
25.7%
14.5%
6.9%
3.5%
9.1%
2.5%
1.4%
5.5%
Most or very trustworthy
54.0%
78.6%
43.4%
81.7%
72.2%
85.5%
Somewhat or not trustworthy
41.3%
20.3%
46.2%
16.7%
23.6%
12.7%
4.6%
1.2%
10.5%
1.7%
4.2%
1.8%
Most or very trustworthy
12.7%
15.9%
14.1%
11.8%
31.4%
25.9%
Somewhat or not trustworthy
57.8%
67.3%
64.1%
73.1%
51.4%
27.8%
Not sure/Don't know
29.5%
16.8%
21.8%
15.1%
17.1%
46.3%
(N) Non-government organization
(O) Local Community Leaders
(P) Bantay Dagat
Not sure/Don't know
(Q) MENRO Staff
Not sure/Don't know
(R) Barangay Captain
Not sure/Don't know
(S) Information received via sms on your phone
143
Source: Information in Table 3 is derived from the question “People hear information about the environment from many different sources. Please tell me
whether you would find these sources as "Most trustworthy, Very trustworthy, Somewhat trustworthy, or Not trustworthy”.
Other Trustworthy Sources
The other categories that came out in this table allow us to think
other possible ways in which we could use as influencers of
behavior change. Law enforcement official had the highest
percentage of responses, with 14%. The Local Government
Environment Official ranked the 2nd other trusted sources, next to
law enforcement. The 3rd person that could be used as influencers
is the National Government Environment Official, having 13.2%
Media Preference by Key Segment
Table 4 presents the results of a cross tabulation of a radio listenership by employment, and illustrates that the preferred radio stations were
Power 91 for all target audiences, except for Fishers of Bio-os who preferred DYWC. All target audiences listen to their preferred radio station
daily.
Table 4: Media Access/Use Questions
Sampling Methodology
Variable
Random
Community of
Tandayag
Random Community of Amlan-LGU
Bio-os
Employee
Fishers of
Tandayag
Fishers of
Bio-os
MPA Enforcement
Team
144
Frequency of listening to the radio in
the past month
Up to 3 days per week
5.5%
10.1%
24.5%
10.3%
14.5%
3.7%
4 to 6 days per week
6.1%
3.6%
11.5%
5.6%
5.8%
18.5%
58.8%
48.8%
26.6%
68.2%
55.1%
37.0%
8.5%
11.9%
8.6%
9.3%
8.7%
7.4%
11.7%
26.5%
10.7%
21.2%
41.7%
18.2%
3.2%
2.0%
2.9%
5.9%
0.0%
0.0%
Power 91
52.2%
30.9%
41.4%
55.1%
34.7%
38.2%
DYEM FM
1.5%
3.2%
5.7%
2.5%
2.8%
5.5%
Bombo Radio
0.6%
0.3%
2.9%
0.0%
4.2%
0.0%
DYHP
2.1%
1.2%
2.1%
3.4%
0.0%
1.8%
Energy FM
0.9%
2.9%
0.7%
2.5%
0.0%
0.0%
MOR Cebu
0.0%
0.6%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Killer Bee
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
YES FM
0.3%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20.5%
17.8%
17.9%
5.9%
16.7%
32.7%
Other
0.9%
0.6%
2.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Not Applicable
6.2%
14.6%
12.1%
3.4%
5.6%
3.6%
Never
12.3%
29.6%
4.2%
11.1%
42.0%
5.5%
Up to 3 days per week
10.2%
10.9%
20.4%
18.8%
8.7%
25.5%
6.0%
3.0%
15.5%
7.7%
10.1%
16.4%
66.5%
41.7%
52.1%
59.8%
29.0%
50.9%
5.1%
14.8%
7.7%
2.6%
10.1%
1.8%
Daily
Not Applicable
Preferred Radio station
DYWC
Love Radio
Don't listen to the radio
Frequency of watching TV in the
past 6 months
4 to 6 days per week
Daily
Not Applicable
145
Preferred TV Station
ABS-CBN, Dumaguete
Fil Products
Local Sky Cable
ABS- CBN Cebu
GMA
TV5
Other
Don't watch
Not Applicable
65.5%
29.7%
51.8%
68.9%
31.0%
69.1%
10.7%
9.3%
20.6%
14.3%
2.8%
5.5%
0.6%
0.9%
2.8%
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
9.3%
0.7%
1.7%
12.7%
5.5%
4.6%
6.4%
4.3%
1.7%
4.2%
9.1%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.8%
0.0%
1.8%
0.3%
0.9%
0.7%
0.8%
0.0%
1.8%
11.9%
19.2%
3.5%
7.6%
29.6%
5.5%
6.4%
24.2%
14.2%
2.5%
19.7%
1.8%
Preferred Newspaper or Magazine
Daily Enquirer
17.8%
3.5%
43.6%
6.8%
1.4%
5.7%
Negros Chronicle
11.5%
1.5%
15.7%
6.0%
2.8%
0.0%
Manila Bulletin
13.0%
7.6%
25.0%
6.8%
8.3%
9.4%
Bandera
6.2%
7.0%
5.7%
6.0%
18.1%
9.4%
Bisaya
0.0%
0.3%
0.7%
0.9%
0.0%
1.9%
Tempo
0.6%
1.7%
2.9%
0.9%
0.0%
1.9%
Bongga
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Super Balita
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
146
Don't Read
Other
Not Applicable
48.2%
47.4%
11.4%
55.6%
52.8%
47.2%
0.3%
0.6%
0.7%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
18.9%
30.5%
12.9%
23.1%
15.3%
24.5%
The following results would give us idea what is preferred type of media. This will help us decide which is the best music to use in the campaign
song or the type of sectors within the media to target, from news to sport, or talk shows to dramas.
Table 5:Preferred Media Type
Sampling Methodology
Random Community of
Tandayag
Random
Amlan-LGU
community of BioEmployee
os
Fishers of
Tandayag
Fishers of Bio-os
MPA Enforcement
Team
(A) Tagalog Love Melodies
Like a lot or like the most
59.8%
36.7%
40.1%
56.7%
40.8%
60.0%
Like a little
26.7%
38.2%
48.6%
39.2%
42.3%
30.9%
Not liked
13.5%
25.1%
11.3%
4.2%
16.9%
9.1%
56.0%
44.2%
50.3%
60.8%
76.1%
80.0%
Like a little
26.7%
34.0%
44.8%
28.3%
18.3%
16.4%
Not liked
17.2%
21.8%
4.9%
10.8%
5.6%
3.6%
Like a lot or like the most
46.4%
32.6%
31.0%
50.0%
64.8%
54.5%
Like a little
37.2%
34.0%
55.6%
35.8%
26.8%
34.5%
Not liked
16.3%
33.4%
13.4%
14.2%
8.5%
10.9%
Like a lot or like the most
56.0%
57.8%
68.5%
60.8%
69.0%
63.6%
Like a little
26.7%
23.8%
25.2%
33.3%
18.3%
14.5%
Not liked
17.2%
18.3%
6.3%
5.8%
12.7%
21.8%
(B) Classic Oldies Music
Like a lot or like the most
(C) Traditional Music
(D) Local news
147
(E) Badminton
Like a lot or like the most
22.1%
14.5%
27.5%
33.6%
22.5%
12.7%
Like a little
18.1%
22.7%
40.1%
31.9%
23.9%
23.6%
Not liked
59.8%
62.8%
32.4%
34.5%
53.5%
63.6%
Like a lot or like the most
17.2%
11.7%
11.9%
31.9%
23.9%
14.5%
Like a little
18.9%
22.7%
35.7%
29.4%
23.9%
18.2%
Not liked
63.9%
65.6%
52.4%
38.7%
52.1%
67.3%
Like a lot or like the most
17.9%
18.7%
27.3%
30.5%
28.2%
18.2%
Like a little
22.2%
26.0%
36.4%
34.7%
29.6%
20.0%
Not liked
59.9%
55.3%
36.4%
34.7%
42.3%
61.8%
Like a lot or like the most
33.2%
42.7%
32.9%
46.6%
51.4%
34.5%
Like a little
23.0%
22.2%
43.4%
35.6%
28.6%
29.1%
Not liked
43.7%
35.1%
23.8%
17.8%
20.0%
36.4%
Like a lot or like the most
56.3%
61.9%
60.1%
52.5%
62.0%
61.8%
Like a little
31.6%
19.2%
37.8%
40.8%
32.4%
29.1%
Not liked
12.1%
18.9%
2.1%
6.7%
5.6%
9.1%
Like a lot or like the most
36.2%
28.3%
42.3%
40.7%
25.7%
29.1%
Like a little
43.7%
27.4%
40.1%
47.5%
38.6%
30.9%
Not liked
20.1%
44.3%
17.6%
11.9%
35.7%
40.0%
Like a lot or like the most
39.4%
25.7%
52.5%
37.8%
34.3%
38.2%
Like a little
41.7%
29.7%
36.9%
44.5%
34.3%
21.8%
(F) Tennis
(G) Biking
(H) Basketball
(I) Religious programs
(J) Miss Dreamland
(K) Concert
148
Not liked
19.0%
44.6%
10.6%
17.6%
31.4%
40.0%
Like a lot or like the most
37.2%
35.6%
31.0%
42.0%
50.7%
43.6%
Like a little
33.4%
28.6%
46.5%
37.0%
28.2%
21.8%
Not liked
29.4%
35.9%
22.5%
21.0%
21.1%
34.5%
Like a lot or like the most
35.1%
37.8%
23.9%
44.5%
45.1%
52.7%
Like a little
32.5%
22.6%
44.4%
30.3%
28.2%
12.7%
Not liked
32.5%
39.6%
31.7%
25.2%
26.8%
34.5%
Like a lot or like the most
16.4%
12.3%
16.2%
25.6%
8.5%
21.8%
Like a little
26.1%
24.3%
45.8%
28.2%
36.6%
9.1%
Not liked
57.5%
63.3%
38.0%
46.2%
54.9%
69.1%
Like a lot or like the most
24.9%
13.7%
43.7%
22.0%
11.4%
12.7%
Like a little
23.8%
19.2%
31.7%
35.6%
30.0%
18.2%
Not liked
51.3%
67.1%
24.6%
42.4%
58.6%
69.1%
Like a lot or like the most
28.9%
17.3%
51.4%
29.1%
17.1%
34.5%
Like a little
27.2%
24.0%
33.1%
36.8%
34.3%
16.4%
Not liked
43.9%
58.8%
15.5%
34.2%
48.6%
49.1%
Like a lot or like the most
31.8%
14.3%
41.0%
33.9%
16.9%
20.0%
Like a little
37.0%
24.0%
43.2%
44.1%
36.6%
30.9%
Not liked
31.2%
61.7%
15.8%
22.0%
46.5%
49.1%
40.4%
30.3%
36.2%
38.1%
33.8%
34.5%
(L) Dramas
(M) Los Companeros
(N) Puppet shows
(O) Internet (YouTube and
Websites)
(P) www.amlan.gov.ph
(Q) Open-air video showing
(R) Radio program
Like a lot or like the most
149
Like a little
40.7%
28.0%
46.8%
44.1%
38.0%
25.5%
Not liked
18.9%
41.7%
17.0%
17.8%
28.2%
40.0%
Like a lot or like the most
52.9%
26.9%
35.3%
52.1%
21.1%
54.5%
Like a little
37.3%
22.8%
53.2%
38.5%
36.6%
21.8%
9.8%
50.3%
11.5%
9.4%
42.3%
23.6%
Like a lot or like the most
60.5%
26.4%
47.5%
61.0%
28.2%
53.8%
Like a little
31.4%
30.6%
43.3%
34.7%
35.2%
28.8%
8.1%
42.9%
9.2%
4.2%
36.6%
17.3%
(S) Fluvial Parade
Not liked
(T) Budyas Festival
Not liked
Source: Data in Table 5 is based on interviews with 1,090 respondents in the pre-campaign survey. In some cases the numbers may not sum up to
100% due to rounding off.
Preferred TV Times
Only about 20% of respondents don’t watch TV at all.
The rest do watch TV at different times of the day in
the weekdays. Most respondents who watch TV have
no particular time (30%). Approximately 18% of
respondents preferred to watch TV between 6:01 p.m.
to 10:00 p.m. This means that as part of the campaign
if television is used as a vehicle, it is important to
maximize the largest number of people watching.
150
Preferred Radio Times
About 24% of respondents don’t listen to the radio.
This means that as part of the campaign, if radio is
used as the vehicle, it should utilize the time where the
most number of people are listening. 23% of
respondents have no particular time in listening the
radio. In general, the time before 6:00 a.m. and 6:01
a.m. to 10:00 a.m. are preferred by 16% and 15% of
respondents, respectively.
Radio Program Preferences and Other Media Preferences
The most popular program types in the radio are news
(approximately 46%) and local music (10%).
Other possible media programs could include TV patrol, an
afternoon program of ABS-CBN.
151
Behavior Change Continuum
152
Going fishing or gleaning in Tandayag/Bio-os Marine Sanctuary
The following assumptions for Tandayag and Bio-os fishemen are based on
the results, as illustrated in the table and the graph:
-Pre-contemplation (3%)
-Maintenance (18%)
For gleaners, the results show that 11% is at maintenance stage and 2% at
the pre-contemplation stage.
153
Involvement in Governance
From the survey results, presented in this table, it is assumed that the
fishers of Tandayag and Bio-os are at the following stages of behavior:
-Pre-Contemplation (3%)
-Validation (12.2%)
Only 1% of fishers were able to reach the maintenance phase of
involvement in MPA governance, particularly attending meetings.
Knowledge and Attitude Questions
Table 6 presents the results for the key questions that were designed to establish the baseline levels for knowledge SMART objectives and to assess
other key knowledge levels. This Table also shows the responses of target audiences for each question, as highlighted in the respective response
options.
Table 6: Knowledge Questions
Sampling methodology
Random
community of
Tandayag
Random
AmlanFishers
Fishers
community of LGU
of
of BioBio-os
Employee Tandayag os
MPA
Enforceme
nt Team
(A) Only members of Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary
Management Committee can harvest fish inside the Tandayag/Bio-os
Marine Sanctuary
True
5.8%
4.0%
12.8%
18.1%
10.1%
7.3%
154
False
60.3%
52.9%
51.1%
66.4%
66.7%
89.1%
Unsure
33.8%
43.1%
36.2%
15.5%
23.2%
3.6%
True
61.7%
44.7%
62.9%
74.8%
38.0%
88.7%
False
9.3%
15.6%
14.0%
16.5%
42.3%
11.3%
29.0%
39.6%
23.1%
8.7%
19.7%
0.0%
True
5.9%
3.4%
10.5%
10.3%
7.2%
5.6%
False
63.9%
55.8%
55.9%
82.9%
75.4%
92.6%
Unsure
30.2%
40.9%
33.6%
6.8%
17.4%
1.9%
26.2%
4.5%
15.4%
28.0%
2.9%
11.8%
False
40.8%
54.9%
50.3%
58.9%
73.9%
86.3%
Unsure
33.0%
40.6%
34.3%
13.1%
23.2%
2.0%
True
1.9%
3.1%
8.4%
11.4%
5.8%
9.1%
False
67.2%
56.4%
73.4%
80.7%
76.8%
89.1%
Unsure
30.9%
40.5%
18.2%
7.9%
17.4%
1.8%
True
29.7%
2.4%
5.6%
21.3%
7.0%
8.9%
False
36.5%
55.3%
74.1%
62.0%
66.2%
88.9%
Unsure
33.8%
42.3%
20.3%
16.7%
26.8%
2.2%
(B) No-one can fish or collect shells inside Tandayag / Bio-os Marine
Sanctuary
Unsure
(C) Only Hook and Line fishing is allowed inside Tandayag / Bio-os
Marine Sanctuary
(D) Anyone can glean inside Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary, just
fishing is not allowed
True
(E) It is legal to use cyanide and dynamite to catch fish in the buffer
zone around Tandayag / Bio-os
(F) The elected officials are allowed to take fish from Tandayag / Bioos Marine Sanctuary when they visit
(G) When a Bantay Dagat ends his shift, he has to wait for the next
Bantay Dagat to arrive before he can leave the Tandayag/ Bio-os
155
guardhouse
True
35.8%
34.7%
41.5%
65.0%
32.4%
50.9%
False
7.4%
13.4%
11.3%
7.7%
23.9%
10.9%
56.8%
52.0%
47.2%
27.4%
43.7%
38.2%
Unsure
Table 7: Attitude Questions
Sampling methodology
Variable
Random
Community of
Tandayag
Random
community of
Bio-os
Amlan-LGU
Employee
Fishers of
Tandayag
MPA
Enforcement
Team
Fishers of Bio-os
Fish will be scared out of the sanctuary
and into the fishing nets
Strongly Agree
2.2%
0.9%
18.7%
6.8%
1.4%
0.0%
Agree
6.4%
12.0%
28.8%
18.6%
11.1%
7.7%
Disagree
73.6%
67.4%
33.8%
58.5%
70.8%
86.5%
Strongly Disagree
17.8%
19.8%
18.7%
16.1%
16.7%
5.8%
9.4%
0.9%
28.9%
11.8%
1.4%
7.5%
Agree
35.2%
22.6%
38.0%
36.1%
38.0%
41.5%
Disagree
49.7%
56.5%
25.4%
47.1%
45.1%
49.1%
5.7%
20.0%
7.7%
5.0%
15.5%
1.9%
8.5%
0.3%
21.3%
6.7%
0.0%
15.1%
Agree
13.6%
14.2%
27.0%
16.0%
19.7%
17.0%
Disagree
61.1%
62.0%
29.1%
61.3%
64.8%
58.5%
Fish catch will continue to decline
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Illegal fishers from outside will be
encouraged to come in and fish within
Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary
Strongly Agree
156
Strongly Disagree
16.8%
23.4%
22.7%
16.0%
15.5%
9.4%
Strongly Agree
10.8%
0.6%
26.8%
5.8%
0.0%
7.5%
Agree
11.7%
14.2%
31.0%
15.8%
29.6%
18.9%
Disagree
64.6%
65.2%
30.3%
69.2%
53.5%
64.2%
Strongly Disagree
13.0%
20.1%
12.0%
9.2%
16.9%
9.4%
Strongly Agree
11.2%
2.7%
19.1%
7.6%
2.8%
17.3%
Agree
17.0%
16.0%
41.8%
26.9%
36.6%
17.3%
Disagree
63.8%
61.2%
29.1%
58.8%
45.1%
59.6%
8.0%
20.1%
9.9%
6.7%
15.5%
5.8%
Strongly Agree
16.9%
5.9%
12.9%
16.0%
8.5%
21.2%
Agree
35.1%
17.5%
28.6%
49.6%
45.1%
44.2%
Disagree
41.5%
60.7%
44.3%
31.9%
38.0%
32.7%
6.4%
16.0%
14.3%
2.5%
8.5%
1.9%
6.0%
2.7%
8.6%
20.7%
5.6%
13.0%
Agree
42.4%
26.9%
26.4%
39.7%
35.2%
44.4%
Disagree
46.7%
57.6%
54.3%
36.2%
54.9%
40.7%
5.0%
12.8%
10.7%
3.4%
4.2%
1.9%
3.2%
0.9%
7.2%
5.1%
2.8%
3.7%
Agree
11.5%
17.9%
25.2%
23.7%
33.8%
18.5%
Disagree
76.3%
65.9%
51.1%
65.3%
57.7%
77.8%
The corals begin to die when the fish are
taken away
The local community will be poorer and
less united
Strongly Disagree
Fishers will catch more fish
Strongly Disagree
Only members of the Fishermen's
Association are involved in the Tandayag /
Bio-os Marine Sanctuary
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
No-one knows who is managing the
Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary
Strongly Agree
157
Strongly Disagree
9.0%
15.3%
16.5%
5.9%
5.6%
0.0%
Strongly Agree
25.1%
13.9%
38.4%
28%
16.9%
40.7%
Agree
48.6%
36.9%
37.7%
49.2%
63.4%
55.6%
Disagree
23.5%
38.1%
18.1%
21.2%
16.9%
3.7%
2.9%
11.2%
5.8%
1.7%
2.8%
0.0%
Too Big
1.5%
0.6%
2.8%
0.8%
5.6%
3.6%
Too Small
3.5%
2.3%
25.4%
5.8%
11.1%
12.7%
Just the right size
54.9%
22.3%
42.3%
73.3%
59.7%
69.1%
Unsure
22.7%
50.9%
21.8%
15.8%
22.2%
10.9%
17.4%;
24.0%;
7.7%
4.2%
1.4%
3.6%
The Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary
regulations need to be followed by all
people who go into the sanctuary
Strongly Disagree
What do you think of the size of Tandayag
/ Bio-os Marine Sanctuary?
Not Applicable
What do you think of the location of Tandayag
/ Bio-os Marine Sanctuary?
55.3%; 188
28.6%; 99
60.6%; 86
80.7%; 96
76.4%; 55
80.0%; 44
1.8%; 6
2.3%; 8
3.5%; 5
0.0%; 0
1.4%; 1
7.3%; 4
Unsure
20.0%; 68
30.3%;
105
23.9%; 34
13.4%; 16
19.4%; 14
5.5%; 3
Not Applicable
22.9%; 78
38.7%;
134
12.0%; 17
5.9%; 7
2.8%; 2
7.3%; 4
100.0%; 340
100.0%;
346
100.0%; 142
100.0%; 119
100.0%; 72
100.0%; 55
In the right place
In the wrong place
Totals
Sampling methodology
random community of
random community of
Amlan-LGU
fishers of
fishers of
MPA Enforcement
158
Tandayag
Bio-os
employee
Tandayag
Bio-os
Team
(40) Who should primarily
enforce the rules and regulations
of Tandayag / Bio-os Marine
Sanctuary? Should it be the
Coastguard, Fishers/gleaners,
the Bantay dagat, MENRO, the
National Police, local village
Coastguard
6.2%; 20
0.9%; 3
7.1%; 10
1.7%; 2
0.0%; 0
7.3%; 4
Fishers/Gleaners
7.4%; 24
5.5%; 19
4.3%; 6
2.5%; 3
11.1%; 8
18.2%; 10
28.0%; 91
34.9%; 121
35.0%; 49
26.7%; 32
38.9%; 28
29.1%; 16
32.0%; 104
30.5%; 106
30.0%; 42
50.0%; 60
30.6%; 22
36.4%; 20
4.9%; 16
1.2%; 4
2.9%; 4
5.8%; 7
0.0%; 0
1.8%; 1
10.2%; 33
11.0%; 38
4.3%; 6
9.2%; 11
2.8%; 2
5.5%; 3
4.9%; 16
5.5%; 19
11.4%; 16
1.7%; 2
13.9%; 10
0.0%; 0
Don't know
0.3%; 1
0.6%; 2
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
Other
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
1.4%; 1
0.0%; 0
6.2%; 20
10.1%; 35
5.0%; 7
2.5%; 3
1.4%; 1
1.8%; 1
100.0%; 325
100.0%; 347
100.0%; 140
100.0%; 120
100.0%; 72
100.0%; 55
Bantay Dagat (licensed
enforcers)
MENRO
National Police
Barangay Council
Members of the Fishermen's
Association
Not Applicable
Totals
Sampling methodology
random community of
Tandayag
(41) Who would you trust
most to head and govern
the Tandayag / Bio-os
Marine Sanctuary
Management
Committee? (Choose
one only)
Community members
4.0%; 13
random community of
Bio-os
7.2%; 25
Amlan-LGU
employee
15.7%; 22
fishers of
Tandayag
7.6%; 9
fishers of Bio- MPA Enforcement
os
Team
4.2%; 3
3.6%; 2
159
Fishers/Gleaners
17.1%; 56
16.2%; 56
7.1%; 10
5.0%; 6
35.2%; 25
40.0%; 22
6.4%; 21
1.2%; 4
2.1%; 3
3.4%; 4
5.6%; 4
3.6%; 2
0.9%; 3
0.9%; 3
0.7%; 1
0.8%; 1
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
23.5%; 77
0.3%; 1
7.1%; 10
20.2%; 24
0.0%; 0
7.3%; 4
0.0%; 0
23.5%; 81
2.9%; 4
1.7%; 2
5.6%; 4
1.8%; 1
7.0%; 23
0.3%; 1
24.3%; 34
16.0%; 19
0.0%; 0
5.5%; 3
Private sector
0.6%; 2
0.0%; 0
0.7%; 1
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
Academic Sector
0.3%; 1
0.0%; 0
0.7%; 1
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
34.3%; 112
39.4%; 136
36.4%; 51
44.5%; 53
42.3%; 30
36.4%; 20
Bantay Dagat
0.3%; 1
0.0%; 0
0.7%; 1
0.0%; 0
2.8%; 2
1.8%; 1
Not sure
0.3%; 1
0.6%; 2
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
Other
0.6%; 2
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
1.4%; 1
0.0%; 0
4.6%; 15
10.4%; 36
1.4%; 2
0.8%; 1
2.8%; 2
0.0%; 0
100.0%; 327
100.0%; 345
100.0%; 140
100.0%; 119
100.0%; 71
100.0%; 55
National Police
Non-government officials
Tandayag Barangay
Council
Bio-os Barangay Council
Local Government
officials
MENRO
Not Applicable
Totals
Sampling methodology
random community of
Tandayag
(42) Has your
catch increased,
decreased or
stayed the same
as a result of
Tandayag / Bioos Marine
Sanctuary? (If
the person does
not fish or glean
mark as NA)
Decreased
random community of Bioos
3.3%; 11
4.7%; 16
Amlan-LGU
employee
fishers of
Tandayag
5.7%; 8
fishers of Bioos
3.3%; 4
13.9%; 10
MPA Enforcement
Team
22.2%; 12
160
Increased
15.4%; 52
2.0%; 7
7.1%; 10
41.7%; 50
26.4%; 19
38.9%; 21
Stayed the
Same
27.3%; 92
13.4%; 46
6.4%; 9
48.3%; 58
50.0%; 36
27.8%; 15
54.0%; 182
79.9%; 274
80.9%; 114
6.7%; 8
9.7%; 7
11.1%; 6
100.0%; 337
100.0%; 343
100.0%; 141
100.0%; 120
100.0%; 72
100
Not Applicable
Totals
The main behavior change and barrier removal that will be trying to achieve in this campaign include attending the Management Committee meeting
and running the Committee.
Self-Efficacy
Sampling methodology
random community of
Tandayag
(A) Attend at
least 6 of the
12
management
meetings of
the Tandayag
/ Bio-os
Marine
Sanctuary
Easy
random community of Bioos
Amlan-LGU
employee
fishers of
Tandayag
fishers of Bioos
MPA Enforcement
Team
29.2%; 100
15.3%; 53
25.5%; 36
58.3%; 70
65.3%; 47
67.3%; 37
Difficult
16.7%; 57
15.0%; 52
17.0%; 24
10.0%; 12
11.1%; 8
14.5%; 8
Not sure
33.9%; 116
41.9%; 145
41.1%; 58
27.5%; 33
18.1%; 13
14.5%; 8
20.2%; 69
27.7%; 96
16.3%; 23
4.2%; 5
5.6%; 4
3.6%; 2
100.0%; 342
100.0%; 346
100.0%; 141
100.0%; 120
100.0%; 72
100.0%; 55
Not
applicable
Totals
Reporting Intrusions, Attitude Q44,B
161
Sampling methodology
random community of
Tandayag
(B) Reporting
an intruder of
Tandayag/
Bio-os
Marine
Sanctuary to
the
enforcement
team
Easy
random community of Bioos
Amlan-LGU
employee
fishers of
Tandayag
fishers of Bioos
MPA Enforcement
Team
35.5%; 122
26.7%; 92
41.1%; 58
70.0%; 84
68.1%; 49
69.1%; 38
Difficult
19.5%; 67
16.2%; 56
12.1%; 17
10.8%; 13
20.8%; 15
16.4%; 9
Not sure
26.2%; 90
30.7%; 106
32.6%; 46
18.3%; 22
6.9%; 5
10.9%; 6
Not
applicable
18.9%; 65
26.4%; 91
14.2%; 20
0.8%; 1
4.2%; 3
3.6%; 2
100.0%; 344
100.0%; 345
100.0%; 141
100.0%; 120
100.0%; 72
100.0%; 55
Totals
Sampling methodology
random community of
Tandayag
random community of Bioos
Amlan-LGU
employee
fishers of
Tandayag
fishers of Bioos
MPA Enforcement
Team
(C) Run a
Tandayag /
Bio-os
Marine
Sanctuary
Committee
every month
Easy
18.0%; 62
9.9%; 34
24.1%; 34
48.3%; 58
59.7%; 43
50.9%; 28
Difficult
25.8%; 89
28.3%; 97
24.8%; 35
17.5%; 21
18.1%; 13
34.5%; 19
Not sure
36.2%; 125
32.4%; 111
36.9%; 52
31.7%; 38
18.1%; 13
12.7%; 7
20.0%; 69
29.4%; 101
14.2%; 20
2.5%; 3
4.2%; 3
1.8%; 1
Not
applicable
162
Totals
100.0%; 345
100.0%; 343
100.0%; 141
100.0%; 120
100.0%; 72
100.0%; 55
Participation in Coastal Clean-up
Sampling methodology
random community of
Tandayag
(D)
Participate in
coastal
clean-up
activity once
a year
Easy
random community of Bioos
Amlan-LGU
employee
fishers of
Tandayag
fishers of Bioos
MPA Enforcement
Team
30.2%; 104
29.1%; 100
71.1%; 101
62.5%; 75
76.4%; 55
74.5%; 41
Difficult
14.5%; 50
9.6%; 33
9.9%; 14
14.2%; 17
8.3%; 6
10.9%; 6
Not sure
35.5%; 122
33.1%; 114
15.5%; 22
22.5%; 27
11.1%; 8
12.7%; 7
19.8%; 68
28.2%; 97
3.5%; 5
0.8%; 1
4.2%; 3
1.8%; 1
100.0%; 344
100.0%; 344
100.0%; 142
100.0%; 120
100.0%; 72
100.0%; 55
Not
applicable
Totals
Sampling methodology
random community of
Tandayag
random community of Bioos
Amlan-LGU
employee
fishers of
Tandayag
fishers of Bioos
MPA Enforcement
Team
(E)
Participate in
reef/ MPA
monitoring
once a year
Easy
28.7%; 98
12.0%; 41
47.2%; 67
54.2%; 65
59.7%; 43
57.4%; 31
Difficult
14.7%; 50
20.8%; 71
12.7%; 18
24.2%; 29
9.7%; 7
9.3%; 5
Not sure
32.8%; 112
33.6%; 115
28.2%; 40
17.5%; 21
19.4%; 14
25.9%; 14
23.8%; 81
33.6%; 115
12.0%; 17
4.2%; 5
11.1%; 8
7.4%; 4
Not
applicable
163
Totals
100.0%; 341
100.0%; 342
100.0%; 142
100.0%; 120
100.0%; 72
100.0%; 54
Source: Table xxx is derived from interviews of 1,090 respondents
Interpersonal Communication
The stages of behavior of respondents were shown in the previous Tables. This is validated in this section by showing that majority
of the respondents have not spoken to anyone about the topics presented below. This means that the majority of the respondents are
not using Interpersonal Communication.
A) Benefits to the community of a well-managed sanctuary
B) The need to improve governance of the Tandayag/ Bio-os Marine Sanctuary in order to benefit its community
C) The need for improve level of trust with “outsiders”
D) The consequences of breaking the rules and regulations of Tandayag/ Bio-os Marine Sanctuary
E) The role in managing marine resources in respective localities.
IC on consequences of breaking the MPA rules
Sampling methodology
random community of
Tandayag
(48) In the past 6 months, have you
talked to anyone about "the
consequences of breaking the Tandayag
/ Bio-os Marine Sanctuary rules &
regulations"? If you have, with whom you
have talked to about this.
Have not talked to anyone
random community of Amlan-LGU
Bio-os
employee
fishers of
Tandayag
fishers of
Bio-os
MPA Enforcement
Team
94.7%; 321
89.9%; 311
88.5%; 123
66.4%; 79
94.4%; 67
74.1%; 40
Talked to spouse/partner
0.0%; 0
0.3%; 1
0.0%; 0
1.7%; 2
0.0%; 0
3.7%; 2
Talked to your children aged 15 or
younger
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
1.4%; 2
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
Talked to friend or neighbor
1.2%; 4
0.3%; 1
2.2%; 3
0.0%; 0
1.4%; 1
14.8%; 8
164
Talked to village elder or local authority
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
0.7%; 1
0.8%; 1
0.0%; 0
1.9%; 1
Talked to Local government
environmental officials
0.3%; 1
0.0%; 0
1.4%; 2
0.8%; 1
0.0%; 0
1.9%; 1
Talked to a Local Tandayag / Bio-os
Fisher or Gleaner
0.9%; 3
0.3%; 1
0.7%; 1
22.7%; 27
1.4%; 1
0.0%; 0
Other
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
0.8%; 1
0.0%; 0
1.9%; 1
2.9%; 10
9.2%; 32
5.0%; 7
6.7%; 8
2.8%; 2
1.9%; 1
*; *
*; *
*; *
*; *
*; *
*; *
Not Applicable
Totals
Role in reporting intrusions
Sampling methodology
random community of
Tandayag
(49) In the past 6 months, have you
talked to anyone about "your role in
reporting intrusions in the Tandayag/ Bioos Marine Sanctuaries to the
enforcement team"? If you have, with
whom you have talked to
Have not talked to anyone
random community of Amlan-LGU
Bio-os
employee
fishers of
Tandayag
fishers of
Bio-os
MPA Enforcement
Team
94.7%; 322
89.3%; 309
89.2%; 124
66.4%; 79
93.1%; 67
72.2%; 39
Talked to spouse/partner
0.0%; 0
0.3%; 1
0.7%; 1
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
Talked to friend or neighbor
0.6%; 2
0.3%; 1
2.2%; 3
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
13.0%; 7
Talked to village elder or local authority
0.3%; 1
0.0%; 0
1.4%; 2
0.8%; 1
0.0%; 0
5.6%; 3
Talked to Local government
environmental officials
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
1.4%; 2
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
Talked to a Local Tandayag / Bio-os
Fisher or Gleaner
1.2%; 4
0.3%; 1
0.0%; 0
26.1%; 31
1.4%; 1
3.7%; 2
N/A
0.0%; 0
0.9%; 3
0.7%; 1
0.0%; 0
1.4%; 1
0.0%; 0
some residents of Tanjay
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
3.7%; 2
Other
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
0.7%; 1
0.8%; 1
0.0%; 0
0.0%; 0
3.2%; 11
9.0%; 31
3.6%; 5
5.9%; 7
4.2%; 3
1.9%; 1
Not Applicable
165
Totals
*; *
*; *
*; *
*; *
*; *
*;
Behavior and Practice
Data on current behaviors relevant to our Pride Campaign are given in Table 8. The difficulty here is having an accurate report of potentially illegal
behaviors. We did not ask the question, have you illegally fished or gleaned this year. Instead we asked the question about seeing anyone gleaning or
fishing in Tandayag/ Bio-os Marine Sanctuary at any time in the past 6 months.
Table 8: Behavior Questions
Sampling Methodology
Random
community of
Tandayag
Random
community of
Bio-os
Amlan-LGU Fishers of
Employee
Tandayag
MPA
Fishers
Enforcement
of Bio-os
Team
Have you seen subsistence fishers from you village in the
last 6 months
Seen
2.5%
3.3%
9.6%
43.2%
28.2%
17.6%
Not seen
81.4%
59.5%
69.1%
48.3%
57.7%
68.6%
Not sure / Don't remember
16.1%
37.3%
21.3%
8.5%
14.1%
13.7%
Yes in Tandayag MPA
5.4%
0.3%
5.8%
67.5%
1.4%
29.6%
Yes in Bio-os MPA
0.0%
3.2%
2.2%
1.7%
22.2%
33.3%
27.2%
0.6%
6.5%
11.7%
0.0%
13.0%
1.5%
29.3%
10.8%
0.8%
41.7%
3.7%
60.5%
64.1%
71.9%
17.5%
15.3%
16.7%
5.4%
2.6%
2.9%
0.8%
19.4%
3.7%
In the past 12 months, have you attended any meeting of
the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary Management
Committee?
No in Tandayag MPA
No in Bio-os MPA
Not applicable
Not attended/participated any
In the past 12 months, have you participated in the
reef assessment of the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine
Sanctuary?
166
Yes in Tandayag MPA
2.4%
0.0%
1.4%
57.5%
1.4%
31.5%
Yes in Bio-os MPA
0.0%
1.8%
2.2%
1.7%
18.1%
25.9%
19.0%
0.6%
6.5%
19.2%
2.8%
13.0%
0.9%
24.7%
12.3%
1.7%
41.7%
7.4%
72.0%
70.6%
74.6%
20.0%
18.1%
14.8%
5.7%
2.4%
2.9%
0.0%
18.1%
7.4%
16.2%
4.3%
66.4%
42.5%
8.5%
35.2%
Community meeting
0.3%
0.0%
1.5%
6.2%
0.0%
3.7%
Reporting violations
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
0.0%
5.6%
Did not participate
2.9%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Not participated
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
5.6%
Other
0.3%
0.0%
0.7%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
79.3%
95.7%
30.7%
47.8%
90.1%
50.0%
Coastal clean-up
5.2%
20.9%
20.5%
30.6%
54.2%
46.3%
Community meeting
0.0%
0.0%
4.5%
4.5%
6.9%
11.1%
Did not participate
2.9%
1.2%
2.3%
0.0%
4.2%
3.7%
Other
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
91.9%
78.0%
72.0%
64.9%
34.7%
37.0%
Yes
22.2%
4.7%
29.8%
42.9%
15.9%
49.1%
No
70.0%
89.2%
66.7%
45.4%
76.8%
47.3%
No in Tandayag MPA
No in Bio-os MPA
Not applicable
Not attended/participated any
In the past six months, have you participated in any of the
activities related to Tandayag MPA?
Coastal clean-up
Not Applicable
In the past six months, have you participated in any of the
activities related to Bio-os MPA?
Not Applicable
In the last six months have you heard of anyone reporting
someone breaking the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary
rules & regulations to the enforcement team?
167
Not Applicable
7.8%
6.1%
3.5%
11.8%
7.2%
3.6%
85.6%
88.4%
90.7%
95.0%
95.8%
98.1%
Municipal mayor
7.0%
2.6%
15.0%
3.4%
1.4%
1.9%
Next door neighbor
0.3%
0.6%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Husband/Wife.
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Would Not Report
0.6%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
N/A
6.7%
8.1%
2.9%
5.0%
2.8%
0.0%
Other
1.3%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
If you were to report someone who has broken the rules &
regulations of the Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary,
who would you report them to?
Local Police, Bantay Dagat, MENRO, Barangay Captain
Barriers to Behavior Change
Benefits to Behavior Change
(63) What benefits might there be in establishing a Tandayag / Bio-os Marine Sanctuary
Committee? (Write in one or more answer, None or Don’t Know)
Counts
Percents
Efficient MPA management and
implementation
12
1.2%
Food security
19
1.9%
Unity
20
2.0%
Spirit of volunteerism
2
0.2%
More MPA awareness
9
0.9%
46
4.6%
More fish inside the MPA due to
Percents
0
100
168
management of the Committee
MPA will be sustained
9
0.9%
12
1.2%
Community will be organized
3
0.3%
Promote tourism
8
0.8%
None
202
20.2%
Don't know
467
46.7%
Monitoring task force is expected
2
0.2%
MPA as breeding ground for fish.
8
0.8%
N/A
99
9.9%
Other
10
1.0%
Not Applicable
77
7.7%
1001
n/a
Increasing fish catch due to MPA
management by the Committee
Totals
169
5. EcoGov MPA Effectiveness Rating
Table 4.a. Tandayag MPA Management Rating
Thresholds
MPA Level
1 - Initiated
At least 6 months
At least 8 total cumulative score
All Level 1 thresholds met
2- Established
At least 1 year
At least 24 Total Cumulative
Score
All level 1 & 2 thresholds met
3 - Enforced
At least 3 years
At least 38 Total Cumulative
Score
All level 1,2 & 3 thresholds met
4- Sustained
At least 5 years
At least 50 Total Cumulative
Score
All level 1, 2, 3 & 4 thresholds
met
Year
requirement
met
Total
Score per
level
Total
threshold
score per
level
Actual
threshold
score
All
threshold
indicators
satisfied?
MPA level
satisfied?
2011
11
6
6
yes
yes
21
21
21
yes
yes
12
33
30
No
4
45
30
170
5 - Institutionalized
At least 7 years
At least 66 Total Cumulative
Score
All level `1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 thresholds
met
8
Total
cumulative
score (out
of 87)
Met/Needs
work
No.
57
34
56
Criteria/Activity Satisfied
Evidence (delete those that are
not available in the site and add
additional evidence if available)
LEVEL 1 – MPA IS INITIATED [Gisugdan ang paghunahuna sa MPA]
3
1
 MPA concept explained and accepted [Ang concepto/hunahuna sa
MPA gipasabot ug nasabtan]
see hard copy of score form for
evidence
(Orientation on MPAs for affected stakeholders from various sectors
conducted. Social acceptance sought through community consultations
/public hearings composed of representatives from various sectors)
[Pagpasabot unsa ang MPA ngadto sa lain-laing sector sa katilingban.
Nakuha ang pag-uyon sa katawhan pinaagi sa community
consultation/public hearings nga gilangkoban sa matag sector]
1
2
 Site surveyed using standard methods with baseline assessment
complete, conducted in a participatory process
report presented
(Reports completed on fish abundance, coral cover and profile on
community and coastal management) [Kompleto ang baseline nga datos
sa gidaghanon sa isda, kabag-on sa corals, kinatibuk-ang impormasyon
sa katilingban, ug mga kalihokan sa pagdumala sa kabaybayonan]
171
3
3
 Site selected with community acceptance [Napili na ang lugar
tukuran sa MPA nga gikauyonan sa katilingban] 
naay barangay resolution
(Based on PCRA with public consultations) [Gamit ang proseso sa PCRA ug
Ecogov inubanan sa public consultations]
1
4

Preliminary management plan drafted [Pagpanday sa pasiunang
management plan]
no copy anymore or orig plan
(Management plan should include policies, structures & responsibilities,
strategies & programs, financial plan and M&E) [Ang management plan
naglangkob ug mga polisiya, istructura ug katungdanan, mga kalihokan
ug programa, plano sa panalapi ug Monitoring and Evaluation]
1
5
 Management body membership tentatively determined [Ang mga
miembro sa Management Body nailhan na pero dili pa hingpit]
naa sa management plan and
creation of menro naa sa ordinance
(Management core group starting to conduct regular meetings with
proper documentation) [Ang pasiunang grupo nga magdumala nagsugod
na sa pagpahigayon ug meetings ug dunay haom nga dokomentasyon]
1
6
 Resolution and/or ordinance drafted [Ang resolusyon o ordinansa
gipanday na]
MO 2-96, revised MO -1-2008
1
7

Education program raising awareness about MPA functions and
benefits started [Pagsugod sa programa sa edukasyon aron mapalambo
ang kahibalo bahin sa kaayuhan sa MPA]
coral cay ang naghimo ani - lecture
on mpa how it works, concept
doneby dags sa barangay hall, copy
of program presented
(Conducted a series of public education activities) [Pagpahigayon ug
sunod-sunod nga nga paghatag ug pagtulon-an sa kadaghanan]
LEVEL 2 – MPA IS ESTABLISHED [Natukod na ang MPA]
1
8
 Community acceptance gained and documented [Ang pag-dawat sa
katilingban naangkon ug nakasulat]
naay barangay ordinance re mpa
172
(Documented through public consultation documents, e.g. barangay
resolution) ) [Nakasulat kini ug miagi ug public consultation, pananglit
barangay resolution]
3
9
3
10
 Ordinance passed and approved by the Municipal Council [And
ordinansa gipasa ug gitugotan sa Municipal Council]
Copy of ordinance
 Management plan adopted and legitimized by the LGU or PAMB [Ang
Management plan gisagop ug gipaluyuhan ug balaod sa LGU]
MO 1-2008
(Adoption of management plan supported by resolution/ ordinance; plan
went through community consultations with multi-sectoral stakeholders
prior to approval/ legitimization) [Ang management plan gisagop pinaagi
sa resolution o ordinansa; ang plano niagi ug community consultations
uban ang lain-laing sector ayha pa ang pagtugot o supporta sa
ordinansa]
3
11
 Management body formed and functional [Ang Management body
naumol na ug naglihok]
(Composition of management group and committees identified; roles &
responsibilities clarified and accepted; initial meetings conducted ) [Ang
naglangkob sa management group ug mga comitiba nailhan na; ang
papel ug katungdana klaro ug gidawat; pasiunang panagtagbo
gipahigayon]
3
12
 Budget for Year 1 implementation allocated [Pagtagana ug budget
para sa unang tuig nga kalihokan]
2011- 500T for CRM
(LGU has committed a budget for the establishment and implementation
of the MPA) [Ang LGU mi-comit ug budget para sa pagtukod ug
pagpatuman sa MPA]
3
13
 Enforcement activities initiated [Gisugdan na ang kalihokan sa
pagpatuman sa MPA]
patrolling logbooks
(Regular guarding of the marine sanctuary initiated.)
1
14

IEC activities conducted [Ang mga kalihokan sa IEC gipahigayon na]
signboards, sa schools IEC, barangay
meetings
173
(e.g. Dissemination of MPA rules & regulations; initial stakeholder
knowledge assessment conducted) [Pagpakatap sa mga balaod ug
regulasyon; pagpahigayon ug pagduki-duki ]
1
15

Boundaries delineated [Ang utlanan sa MPA klaro]
naay boya
(Anchor buoys, marker buoys and/or boundary marks installed) [Mga
pataw para sa pagangkla, pataw nga timailhan sa utlanan]
1
16

Signboards/billboards posted [Nibarog na ang signboards ug
billboards]
naay billboard
(Should show either map/zones, rules & regulations and/or other relevant
details) [Ang mga signboards/billboards nagpakita up mapa, mga balaod
ug uban pang mahinungdanong detalye]
1
17
 MPA outpost or other structures constructed [Ang mga katukuran
alang sa pagpasikad sa balaod natokod na]
naay guardhouse
(Guardhouse and/or other MPA-related structures constructed) [Ang
guardhouse o uban pang klase sa katukuran nga nga dunay
kahilambigitaman sa MPA]
1
18
 Biophysical monitoring includes local participation [Ang pagdukiduki sa mga buhilaman sa dagat gipahigayon uban ang local nga pag
apil-apil]
20 trained locals
(Locals were trained to do biophysical surveys using standard methods)
[Nabansay na ang mga local nga lumolopyo aron pagbuhat sa pagdukiduki sa mga buhilaman sa dagat gamit ang standard nga pamaagi]
LEVEL 3 – MPA IS ENFORCED [Ang MPA gipasikad/gipatuman]
1
19
 Budget from LGU or from other sources allocated and is accessible
for MPA management [Ang budget sa LGU ug uban pang kakuhaan
gitagana ug pwede makuha alang sa pagdumala sa MPA]
done for CRM at the municipal level;
done at brgy level as well c/o
bookeeper
174
(There is a legal document by the LGU or an agreement with the private
sector allocating budget for MPA management; financial reports being
prepared and reported) [Adunay legal nga dokomento o kasabotan tali sa
LGU ug pribadong sector aron pagtagana ug budget alang sa pagdumala
sa MPA; and mga report sa financial nga aspeto]
1
20
 Management body active and supported by legal instrument [Ang
Management body actibo na ug gipaluyuhan ug balaod-legal nga
documento]
naay mgt plan 2008 to 2012 CRM
plan, AIP
(Implements the management plan including enforcement and
monitoring activities based on prepared annual operational plan;
regularly convenes for meetings; provides a venue to manage conflict or
resolve issues) [Ang Management plan gipatuman-naglangkob ug
enforcement-pagpasikad sa balaod ug pagbalik tan-aw nga nagsumikad
sa gihan-ay nga operational plan; paghimo ug panagtigom; pagtagana
ug panahon aron totkan ug solbaron ang mga issues]
3
21
 Collaborative patrolling and surveillance conducted by mandated
enforcement group and local community volunteers, records
maintained and open to everyone [Hiniusang pagbantay ug
pagmatngon gipahigayon na inubanan sa enforcement group (PNP) ug
local nga voluntaryo; mga record padayon gibuhat ug abre alang sa
tanan]
(Enforcement group supported by legal instrument; enforcement plan
regularly prepared and being implemented, e.g. day/night shifts, by
mandated enforcement group with assistance from local community
volunteers) [Ang grupo nga tigpasikad sa balaod gipaluyohan ug balaod;
dunay gisubay nga enforcement plan-adlaw gabii nga pagbantay]
Copy of legal instrument
Patrolling records
1
22
 MPA billboards, boundary markers/anchor buoys maintained [Mga
billboards, timailhan sa mga utlanan-mga pataw]
reflected sa AIP, menro does this and
NRD, bantay dagat, FA
(Funds allocated for maintenance of enforcement support structures. May
be part of municipal CRM budget) [Pondo gitagana alang sa mga
katukuran kalabot sa enforcement]
3
23
 Education program sustained public awareness and compliance 
(A long term IEC program is currently being implemented in support of
enforcement and the general MPA objectives)
62T budget for 2011 CRM education,
wholistic approach
175
0
24

Regular participatory biophysical monitoring being conducted
[Kanunay nga pagpahigayon ug pagduki-duki sa mga buhilaman sa
dagat]
(Documented surveys conducted at least once annually using standard
methods) [Ang resulta sa survey nakasulat; gibuhat ang survey matag
tuig]
just trained locals this march 2011,
so not regular pa.
0
25
 Fishing effectively stopped inside the sanctuary zone [Ang panagat
sulod sa MPA nahunong na]
(No fishing-related violations/apprehensions reported inside MPA for the
past year or if violations occurred these have been prevented or duly dealt
with such that no overall adverse effect on the ecosystem has resulted)
[Wala nay nabalita nga nanagat; mga kalapasan o nadakpan sulod sa
MPA sa milabay nga tuig; kung dunay nisulod kini napugngan aron dili
makahatag ug kadaot sa dagat]
last record 2009
3
26
 Illegal and destructive fishing reduced outside of MPA [Ang illegal ug
makadaot nga panagat mikunhod gawas sa MPA]
last record 2009
(Violations/apprehensions reported at least or at minimum within 5 km
from the MPA boundaries have been reduced by 80% for the past year.
This Implies that baseline violation reports have been estimated or
gauged or at least based on the previous year) [Mikunhod (80%) na ang
nabalita nga kalapasan sulod sa 5 ka kilometro gikan sa utlanan sa MPA]
LEVEL 4 – MPA IS SUSTAINED [Ang MPA nagmalungtaron]
1
27
 MPA management plan and/or ordinance reviewed/updated in a
participatory process [Ang management plan ug ordinansa gibalikan ug
tan-aw inubanan ang processo sa katilingban]
(Management plan and/or ordinance amended with the participation of
various stakeholders) [Ang management plan ug ordinansa giamendahan
uban ang pagapil-apil sa kadaghanan]
Copy of amendments
1
28

Budget from LGU or from other sources is being allocated and
accessed for 2 or more consecutive years [Ang budget gikan sa LGU ug
uban pang kakuhaan gitagana ug pwede magamit sulod sa duha ug
daghang pang katuigan nga pagpatuman sa pagdumala]
Financial reports
Copy of contracts
176
(Financial reports being regularly prepared, audited and reported; proper
procurement & contracting procedures are strictly being followed and
transparent, e.g. reports are accessible and reported) [Ang mga report
pinansiyal giandam sa kanunay; haom/sakto ug klaro nga pagpamalit ug
gamit-nagsubay sa balaod; and reports makita sa tanan]
1
29
 Management body capable to run the MPA independently [Ang
Management body adunay kahanas sa pagpadagan sa pagdumala sa
MPA]
done by menro
(Management body supervises/facilitates management activities
[enforcement, budgeting & financial management, M&E, IEC, etc.] and
coordinates activities with partners) [Ang management body mao ang
nangulo sa mga kalihokan sa pagdumala ug pakiglambigit sa mga
partners-pagpasikad sa balaod, pagdumala sa pondo]
0
30
1
31
0
32
 Enforcement system fully operational [Ang pagpasikad sa balaod
hingpit nga naglihok]
(Mandated enforcement group implementing regularly prepared
enforcement plan; enforcement support structures maintained &
patrolling activities sustained for 2 consecutive years or more; effective
reporting system in place) [Ang grupo nga gitahasan sa balaod kanunay
nag andam ug enforceement plan; giatiman ang mga katukuran
(guardhouse ug pumpboat ug uban pa) ug namalahutayon ang sulod sa
duha ka tuig o daghan pang katuigan; epektibong nga pagbalita sa mga
panghitabo]
 MPA billboards, boundary markers/anchor buoys maintained [Mga
billboards, timailhan sa mga utlanan-mga pataw]
(Site development structures and equipment maintained for 3 consecutive
years or more)[Giatiman ang mga billboard ug mga buya]
17 bantay dagat for municipal
waters [6 for tandayag], + police, + 4
menro - pero wala pang enforcement
plan
 Performance of management body regularly monitored and
evaluated with community/stakeholder participation [Ang dagan sa
pagdumala sa management body kanunay gisubay ug balikan ug tan-aw
inubanan sa katilingban]
performance assessment done in 2009
but limited to mgt, participatory only
started in march 2011
Photographs
Ocular survey
(Performance monitoring program in place and conducted regularly for 2
consecutive years or more; reporting system for ordinary citizens to
complain w/o fear of consequences available and widely known)
[Natukod na ang programa sa pag monitor ug gibuhat kada duha ka tuig
o daghan pang katuigan; adunay reporting system sa mga mulo sa
katawhan ]
177
0
33
 Annual participatory biophysical monitoring and timely feedback of
results being implemented for 2 consecutive years or more, monitoring
team accountable for reliability of results [after 2 years from
establishment or the baseline reference up to the evaluation period]
[Tinuig nga pagbalik tan-aw sa estado sa buhilaman sa dagat-kini gibuhat
sulod sa duha ka tuig o daghang pang katuigan; ang monitoring team mao
ang mupahigayon aron insakto and datos nga mareport ug makuha]
dili pa annual
(Documented surveys using standard methods; reports available; results
posted in billboards) [Nakasulat ang mga resulta sa survey gamit ang
standard methods; and mga reports mabasa ug kini nakapatik sa mga
billboards]
0
34
 Socio-economic monitoring regularly conducted, monitoring team
accountable for timely feedback and reliability of results
fish catch monitoring initiated sa
enrd 1998 for 2 years
(Fisheries and/or socio-economic variables being regularly monitored by
local monitoring team; data summaries/reports are available and easily
accessible)
0
35

Environment friendly enterprise and/or fees collected as a
sustainable financing strategy
(Environment-friendly products/goods sold to tourists, impose collection
of user-fees, etc.)
0
36
 Illegal and destructive activities stopped inside and within the
vicinity of MPA
(No violations/apprehensions reported inside and within 5 km of the MPA
boundary or violations prevented or duly prosecuted and sanctioned for 2
consecutive years or more)
less than 50T bper year from diving
fees
LEVEL 5 – MPA IS INSTITUTIONALIZED
1
37

Formal commitment from the Provincial Council giving MPA
stronger political support
(Gives MPA institutional support to strengthen enforcement and
collaboration)
no MOU but included in the services
offered to the municipalities, office
of enrd part sa ilahang program
1
38

Management plan refined with stakeholder participation for
adaptive management
(Incorporates further refinements after gaining much experience and
lessons to improve strategies)
2007 CRM plan, participatory
process
178
3
39
 MPA management plan including budgetary requirements
incorporated in the LGU development plan
(MPA incorporated within the long-term LGU area-wide development
plan)
 Management body capacitated for fund sourcing
(Can prepare and submit proposals to seek financial assistance from
external sources e.g. funds sourced by local management bodies)
menro created and with funds to run
activities
1
40
1
41
 Effective coordination with appropriate national & local agencies on
CRM/MPA policies and with other LGUs achieved; accountabilities and
working relationships among collaborating institutions clearly defined
and formalized
(Coordination on implementation and resolution particularly of issues that
transcend local boundaries including MPA networking with other MPAs
etc.)
collaboration among national and
local agencies, bfar, denr, ngos,
province, etc.
0
42
 Evaluation of ecological and socio-economic impacts conducted
and feedback mechanisms are in place
(Assessment of resource status and long-term trends conducted; Analysis
of change in local economy and long-term trends of user groups
conducted; Reports of these studies have been completed and reported
back to stakeholders and/or conference or symposia)
Assessment reports
0
43
 Performance M&E linked to an incentive system regularly conducted walapa
(Recognition/awards are regularly being given to outstanding members,
law enforcers, etc.; incentives can also include priority for granting of
available loans or alternative livelihood opportunities; feedback
mechanisms for the communities such as suggestion box, complaint desk
in the LGU, village assembly, are available)
0
44
 IEC program on MPAs sustained over the years
(Information dissemination activities sustained according to long-term IEC
program; citizens can conveniently access MPA-related info and LGUdisseminated materials such as minutes of meetings, leaflets, etc.)
1
45
0
46

Advanced IEC materials developed and disseminated with
assistance from partners and/or private sector grants (e.g. video
production) 
 MPA emphasizes on public education and is being used as a study
tour site, residents advocate for MPAs
(After much experience, members are ready to share learnings and impart
knowledge; presence of identified group that conducts tours and capable
of giving talks on MPAs; paper/s written on their success stories
got funding from peace corps, dole,
ngo network of negros or, bfar, etc.
naay video produced by silliman for
use diri with input from lgu
naapil na sa learning sites pero
puwede pa i-improve, alternative
site sa dauin
179
published)
0
47
 Expansion strategies or enhancement programs initiated
(MPA coverage is expanded, e.g. from a sanctuary to a park; or scope of
conservation activities is heightened, e.g. coral reef restoration, culturing
of clams, etc)
0
48
 Support facilities constructed/added
(E.g. tourism facilities, guardhouse expanded into an education/training
center, etc.)
0
49
 Revenues from enterprise and/or fees sustained and accounted for
(Existing sustainable financing mechanisms are well-managed and welldocumented; financial reports easily accessible)
Management Focus
Management Plan
Management Body
Legal Instrument and support
Community Participation
Financing
IEC
Enforcement
Monitoring and evaluation
Maintenance of infrastructure and site
development
Relevant indicators
4, [10], 27, 38, [39]
5, [11], 20, 29,[32], 40
6, [9], 37, 41
[1], [3], 8
[12], 19, 28, 35, 49
7, 14,[ 23], [44], 45,[46]
[13], 15, [21], [25], [26], [30], [36]
2, 18, 24, 33, 34, 42, [43]
16, 17, 22, 31, 47, 48
no expansion in size…..included in
seeding of giant clam by silliman
about 50T generated from user fees
Total Available Actual Score per
points
Management Focus
9
9
10
7
6
6
7
7
7
5
12
6
19
10
9
2
6
4
Actual Score divided by
Total Available Points
100.0%
70.0%
100.0%
100.0%
71.4%
50.0%
52.6%
22.2%
66.7%
Table 4.b. Bio-os MPA Management Focus Percentage Points
180
Management Focus
Management Plan
Management Body
Legal Instrument and support
Community Participation
Financing
IEC
Enforcement
Monitoring and evaluation
Maintenance of infrastructure and site
development
Relevant indicators
4, [10], 27, 38, [39]
5, [11], 20, 29,[32], 40
6, [9], 37, 41
[1], [3], 8
[12], 19, 28, 35, 49
7, 14,[ 23], [44], 45,[46]
[13], 15, [21], [25], [26], [30], [36]
2, 18, 24, 33, 34, 42, [43]
16, 17, 22, 31, 47, 48
Total
Available
points
9
10
6
7
7
12
19
9
6
Actual Score per
Management
Focus
9
7
6
7
5
9
10
2
Actual Score divided
by Total Available
Points
100.0%
70.0%
100.0%
100.0%
71.4%
75.0%
52.6%
22.2%
4
66.7%
6. Letters of Support
(Insert any letters of support for the campaign by key partners, politicians etc) (reference Lola p 169)
7. Threat Ranking
(Insert jpeg from your Miradi threat ranking with brief summary explanation; include experts consulted and any assumptions
made; if factor chains are not aligned with content of plan the explain any discrepancies) (reference Serena island p35)
Section D: Threat Analysis, b. Threat Ranking
Using the Concept Model created through a series of consultations with the marine resource management experts, local resource users and the
MENRO of Amlan, the direct threats were ranked in Miradi Software. These threats were also identified during the consultations.
This ranking serves to:
181
1) Identify the highest rank “target” (coral reef and associated macro-invertebrates)
2) Identify the highest rank “threat” that impact this target (overfishing and gleaning)
Scope, Severity and Irreversibility
Each threat is ranked by Scope, Severity and Irreversibility against each target using the following scoring guide:
A. Scope (Area)




Very high: The threat is likely to be pervasive in its scope, affecting the conservation target across all or most (71%-100%) of its occurrence/population.
High: The threat is likely to be widespread in its scope, affecting the conservation target across much (31%-70%) of its occurrence/population.
Medium: The threat is likely to be restricted in its scope, affecting the conservation target across some (11%-30%) of its occurrence/population.
Low: The threat is likely to be very narrow in its scope, affecting the conservation target across a small proportion (1%-10%) of its occurrence/population.
B. Severity




Very high: Within the scope, the threat is likely to destroy or eliminate the conservation target, or reduce its population by 71%-100% within ten years or three
generations.
High: Within the scope, the threat is likely to seriously degrade/reduce the conservation target, or reduce its population by 31%-70% within ten years or three
generations.
Medium: Within the scope, the threat is likely to moderately degrade/ reduce the conservation target, or reduce its population by 11%-30% within ten years or
three generations.
Low: Within the scope, the threat is likely to only slightly degrade/reduce the conservation target, or reduce its population by 1%-10% within ten years or three
generations.
C. Irreversibility (Permanence)




Very high: The effects of the threat cannot be reversed and it is very unlikely the conservation target can be restored, and/or it would take more than 100 years
to achieve this (e.g., wetlands converted to a shopping center or a species going extinct).
High: The effects of the threat can technically be reversed and the conservation target restored, but it is not practically affordable and/or it would take 21-100
years to achieve this (e.g., wetland converted to agriculture).
Medium: The effects of the threat can be reversed and the conservation target restored with a reasonable commitment of resources and/or within 6-20 years
(e.g., ditching and draining of wetland).
Low: The effects of the threat are easily reversible and the conservation target can be easily restored at a relatively low cost and/or within 0-5 years (e.g., offroad vehicles trespassing in wetland).
182
Miradi software automatically captures the targets from the Concept Model showing it along the “X” axis with the direct threats aligned on the “Y”
axis. The following is the threat ranking for the direct threats and conservation target identified for Tandayag and Bio-os Marine Sanctuaries. As
shown in the Threat ranking Table, the summary target rating overfishing ranked very high, followed by coral bleaching, and gleaning.
Entanglement of plastic and other tidal debris ranked the lowest. Reef fishes and live corals are equally affected by overfishing.
Threat Ratings
183
8.
Factor Chain
(Insert jpeg from your Miradi factor chains with brief summary explanation; include experts consulted and any assumptions
made; if factor chains are not aligned with content of plan the explain any discrepancies) (reference Serena island p38)
The key conservation components of Tandayag and Bio-os Marine Sanctuaries can be divided into three key “targets” (reef fishes, live corals and
coral reef associated invertebrates). Each of these targets is threatened by a complex of one or more direct threats. Four direct threats were
identified, three of which can be attributed directly to human activities, while one (increase sea water temperature) can be indirect outcomes of
human activities and constitute natural fluctuation of the earth’s lifecycle.
The four threats faced by Tandayag and Bio-os Marine Sanctuaries are:
1. Overfishing (which leads to reduction in reproductive stock, significant reduction in fisheries productivitiy)
2. Entanglement of plastics and other tidal debris in coral reefs
3. Gleaning
4. Coral bleaching (due to increase sea water temperature)
The main driving forces behind these threats are the fact that there are too many fishers in Tandayag and Bio-os as the marine resources are
essentially considered an open access for all. A certain regulation, giving preferential rights to marginal fishers in these two localities, is in already
place. Fishers from other neighboring towns are still allowed to fish provided that they only use hook and line and should secure permit from the
host municipality.
There are a number of factors contributing to a somehow “poor” management of marine resources and enforcement in Tandayag and Bio-os
marine sanctuary regulations. These include lack of involvement of community in MPA related activities and enforcement (passing intelligence
report of intrusions).
184
185
186