Challenges and Opportunities for Managing Flood Risk and Floodplain ManagementResults from the 3rd Gilbert F. White Forum The 34th ASFPM Annual Conference May 18, 2010 Oklahoma City, OK Doug Plasencia, P.E., CFM ASFPM Foundation Events Committee Chair Vice President Michael Baker Jr. Inc. The ASFPM Foundation Extension of ASFPM Dedicated to raising funds and supporting education and research for flood loss reduction Example Efforts Flood Forums Flood Manager Game Publications CFM Seed Funding NAI Initiatives The 3rd Gilbert F. White Forum Sponsors AECOM Bender Consulting Services, Inc. CDM The Council Oak Dewberry ESP Associates, PA Greenhorne & O'Mara H2O Partners, Inc. Michael Baker Jr. Inc. PBS&J Stantec Consulting, Inc. URS Corp. The Gilbert F. White Flood Policy Forum Foundation Signature Event “…periodic gathering of experts...” “…national discussion of important floodplain management issues…” “…named after Gilbert F. White the most influential floodplain management policy expert of the 20th century…” The Gilbert F. White Flood Policy Forum “The forums are not only a tribute to his work, but also a recognition of the success of his deliberative approach to policy analysis and research” 3rd Gilbert F. White Flood Policy Forum & Symposia – Flood Risk Management Symposium 1 - Defining and Measuring Flood Risks and Floodplain Resources (September 2009) Symposium 2 - Flood Risk Perception, Communication, and Behavior (November 2009) Forum - Managing Flood Risk (March 2010) Question #1 Has a century of work in flood protection resulted in an outcome that we would wish to continue into the future? Observation #1 As a nation, water resources development has been our defacto floodplain and coastal policy for nearly a century. Will this policy approach be satisfactory for the future? Question #2 Should we be concerned about the extent and condition of our floodplain and coastal resources? Observation #2 The ability of floodplain resources to provide fisheries, clean water, habitat, and other functions for our future is in question. What adjustments are necessary to ensure our resources are sufficient for the future? The Need for a Resource Conservation Ethic in Flood Risk Management Plasencia & Monday 2009 Maintain sight of the dual policy role of FPM Recognize the importance of these resources to our economy and our overall well-being Suggests similarities between our conservation oriented advances in forestry and agronomy policy with FPM Define Flood Risk Management to include “Flooding Risk” and “Floodplain Risk” Question #3 How do we craft a flood risk and resource management policy and strategy that will make a difference in human behavior? Observation #3 Individuals and policy makers simply do not understand or choose to ignore flood risk or threats to our resources. Question #4 How do we adapt to a changing world (climate, population, economies…)? Observation #4 We traditionally are much better at planning based on past histories vs. forecasting with many unknowns . A Flood Risk Management and Resource Strategy has Broad Implications Introduces “risk continuum” vs. “at risk or not at risk” Should allow the ability to benchmark and monitor risk at various levels Opens the door for considering and communicating a series of actions that increase or decrease risk To be effective must be inclusive of a variety of uses and functions within floodplains and coastal areas. OUTCOMES How do we benchmark and monitor our progress towards achieving this overarching vision? The Forum experts agreed that a suite of indicators is needed Indicators could be grouped . How do we get the Public and Decision makers to Act in a more Risk-aware and Resource-sensitive Manner? “How do we move the dial” Incentives (financial and societal) for avoiding floodplain and coastal areas in development and redevelopment Revival of programs that foster locally driven processes for change Flood insurance premiums reflect true risk increase the involvement of stakeholders What do we need to adjust in policy and programs to meet the overarching vision and overcome other challenges? Achieve consensus on the term “flood risk.” Risk management must embrace the value of the natural resources We are stuck on communicating the complexities of flood risk to the public with little result Progress will not be made unless we set defined goals and monitor Goals and approaches should be locally based and techniques should be scalable. What are the knowledge gaps we need to fill? An inventory of floodplain resources and development . What is it about successful community-based approaches that makes them work? Understanding what motivates people to purchase property where they do. Understand risk avoidance better. Can we get people to change their behavior? Assess the full cost of local decisions— externalization is usually unquantified. Identify anticipated impacts of climate change Action Agenda The Forum suggested: The newly revived Federal Interagency Task Force adopt a common definition for comprehensive flood risk management as part of an update to the UNP All people doing training and messaging need to be on same page. Local indicators of progress in floodplain management need to be developed The incentives and disincentives inherent in existing federal/state programs be assessed to determine which support/undermine comprehensive flood risk management The 3rd Gilbert F. White Forum Volunteers Bill Brown Greg Main Bruce Bender Jacki Monday Chad Berginnis Jeanne Christie Clive Goodwin Kimberly Bitters Dale Lehman Larry Larson Debbie Pond Linda Manning Dennis Miletti Maria Honeycutt Diane Brown Pam Poque Doug Bellomo Sally McConkey Doug Plasencia Sam Riley Medlock Ed Thomas Scott Edelman Firas Mikaram Tim Axtman George Riedel Victor Hom Gerry Galloway Wally Wilson Greg Baecher QUESTIONS Questions The 34th ASFPM Annual Conference May 18, 2010 Oklahoma City, OK Doug Plasencia, P.E., CFM ASFPM Foundation Events Committee Chair Vice President Michael Baker Jr. Inc.