http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_panther Dr. Raymond Randall Sue Harrington Podcasting in Assessment: New Technology in Higher Education Research (PANTHER) #uolbdra Context Why? What? How? Experience Feedback from staff and students Where next? Audio feedback School of Psychology Occupational Psychology MSc Occupational Psychology MSc Psychology of Work Forensic Psychology Clinical Psychology Undergraduate 3 years ago: Blackboard was an optional discussion forum All paper course materials and handbooks All paper-based marking Poor audit trail of markers’ comments Deadline times unfair for overseas students Long marking turn-around times. Online Course Materials Central portal for support resources E-moderated module discussion forums E-moderated dissertation development forums Online dissertation supervision Duckling Project: Podcasts Second Life e-book readers Podcast use in Carpe Diem e-tivities Increase Staff/student Interaction Increase student interaction/collaboration Support for the module assignments Practice related application of learning: Linked to learning outcomes and skills development Increased variety in teaching & learning methods Online Assessment and Feedback Audit trail Cost Environment Equity in submission dates Readability Turnaround time Increase perception of staff/student interaction. Decrease isolation of DL Additional media formats – increased variety “Martini” learning: anywhere, anytime, any device Encourage engagement with feedback Explanatory power of spoken vs. written word Personalised feedback (dissertations) Develop once, deliver often Online group e-tivities for each assignment Volunteers Contributions assessed as part of assignments Multiple deliverables & deadlines during module Each students contributions assessed Students: Positive: interaction; relevant preparation for the actual assignments; practical relevance. Negative: Deadline structure reduced flexibility of DL Staff: Positive: interaction and engagement with students Negative: assessment difficult and time consuming Outcome: Complementary non-assessed activities All module & unit assignments; dissertations Double submission: Initially Gradebook then Turnitin Email copy for marking. Track changes and comments on assignment Feedback document Email return to student Plagiarism evidence posted, but moving to electronic Turnitin report. Students: Positive: Readability; turnaround time; increased feedback Negative: IT Staff: Positive: Easier; faster; iterative comments; reduced cost; reduced admin; full audit trail Negative: Discipline required not to correct everything; students & instructions Gradebook: Less easy to use; less clear to read; need to be online. Production method from BDRA workshop: Structured model for planning each podcast Series for dissertations and Research Methods Module specific podcast Assessment: Feedback and feed forward Feed forward Podcasts: Specific guidance for approaching each assignment Generic guidance for academic writing Dissertation portfolio Generic cohort feedback for each assignment Individual feedback for draft dissertation How to approach a specific assignment General guidance on assignments Guidance on how dissertations are assessed General cohort assignment feedback Specific individual dissertation feedback Students: Positive: ‘Bridging the gap’, mobility, flexibility, better use of time, clarity Negative: None so far Staff: Positive: Enjoyable; time saving; easier to explain; less misunderstanding – correct emphasis; useful for other team members to support students Negative: Individual differences; file size E-tivities: Second Life exercise (Duckling); interactive Induction and pre-Dissertation Modules (CDDC) Audio Feedback: To be rolled-out to module assignments Research in progress Impact on grades and retention Student usage Differences with written feedback (Education) Sue Harrington sh219@le.ac.uk