IT and Telecom Sector Analysis 1 Overall Project Objectives Adopt a baseline of NYC economic forecasts prior to September 11 Assess economic impact of September 11 attack on all key industries and sectors of city economy in short- and long-term • Specific focus on lower Manhattan and New York City Identify priorities to accelerate New York’s recovery A.T. Kearney, Bain & Company, Booz-Allen & Hamilton, The Boston Consulting Group, KPMG, McKinsey & Company, and PricewaterhouseCoopers are collaborating in this unprecedented effort by addressing the Energy, Financial Services, Healthcare/Biotech, Insurance, IT/Telecom, Manufacturing, Media/Entertainment, Non-profit, Professional Services, Real Estate, Retail, Small Businesses, and Transport/Tourism sectors 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary NYC Snapshot Pre-9/11 Baseline Impact Assessment Actions Methodology and Assumptions Appendices 3 Executive Summary 4 The events of 9/11 modestly impacted the technology sector– recommended actions can help the sector support an overall economic turnaround The impact of the attacks on the sector was small--the expected return to growth for the technology sector is delayed by 6-12 months • Pre 9/11, slowing revenue growth was expected to reverse by early 2002 – new estimates show a return in 2003 • Traditional IT and telecom heavy spenders (e.g., Financial Services, Media) expect to continue spending reductions in 2002 Infrastructure rebuilding and repair help the sector turn around as companies replace damaged equipment with upgraded technology standards where possible • Carriers (e.g., Verizon, Sprint, AT&T) suffered capital losses, and should seek to hasten the recovery through advanced technology rollout and increased capacity for redundancy in the New York area • IT infrastructure providers can use rebuilding/repair activities as an opportunity to help clients upgrade the capabilities of their pre 9/11 infrastructure In the short term, the sector can work together with the business community to address critical post9/11 concerns including data and system security, redundancy, and survivability • Companies have become more cognizant of system and data backup/redundancy issues and expect to spend more on these services in the future • Products and services provided by the technology sector companies can address many of these concerns For the long term, the sector needs to work together to build a truly redundant and distributed 5 Understanding the nature of the impact, we developed four imperatives and associated actions to mitigate the effects Imperatives Rebuild World-Class Infrastructure Key Actions Accelerate restoration of communications infrastructure • Reimburse/finance rebuilding of damaged infrastructure • Leverage opportunities to deploy “leapfrogging” technologies Build the broadband infrastructure to support multiple centers of business around New York City (e.g., Lower Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, Upper Manhattan) Collaborate for the Future Create industry-specific demand-side and supply-side consortia (e.g., Financial Services, Communications Services) • Develop current and future industry-wide infrastructure requirements (e.g., redundancy, availability, capacity) and the plans to implement • Establish clear communication of priorities to suppliers (equipment and services) • Coordinate new technology implementation efforts (e.g., mesh networks, 3G, etc) among multiple service providers • Leverage existing industry consortia to extent possible (e.g., SIAC) Make NYC Better for Small Business Establish new business development zone(s) throughout NYC • Identify and prioritize prospective areas for development • Deploy advanced technology infrastructure, targeted toward small-business requirements Nurture Innovation and Foster Competition Establish industry-wide commitment to develop innovative technologies • Channel greater investment to new technologies enabling new business platforms • Provide public sector support where possible to encourage development and deployment of new technologies (e.g., 3G, 802.11b, mesh networks) 6 Pre-attack, the IT and Telecom sector generated $37.8B* and employed nearly 97,000 people throughout New York City Information Technology Revenue, Jobs, and Companies (2000) $11.6B 52,867 Telecommunications Revenue, Jobs, and Companies (2000) 1,174 $26.2B* 100% 100% 90% 90% 80% 80% 70% 6.7 35,694 731 60% 50% 50% 29 0.6 524 70% 60% 40% 43,922 21.8 42,406 488 40% 1,506 30% 20% 30% 4.2 15,667 414 20% 10% 10% 0% 0% Revenue Software Jobs Hardware Companies Services 4.4 1,516 Revenue* Jobs Hardware 36 Companies Services *Note: Only includes revenues generated in New York City. Verizon generates an additional $61B outside of New York City Source: Dunn & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis 7 On an annual basis, the IT and Telecom sectors generally showed declining growth prior to 9/11 IT Industry Pre-9/11 Projected Annual Growth Telecom Industry Pre-9/11 Projected Annual Growth 40% Annual Telecom Revenue Growth (%) Annual IT Revenue Growth 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% 2000 2001 Software 2002 2003 Services 2004 2005 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% 2000 Hardware 2001 2002 2003 2004 Telecom Hardware Voice Data Wireless 2005 Source: IDC, Gartner Group, Economy.com, BAH Analysis New technology purchases drive the IT Hardware market, creating greater sensitivity to slowing corporate IT spend and a general economic downturn Outsourcing, maintenance, and other short-term fixed IT spend areas support the service sector, limiting its exposure to economic downturns Emphasis on security systems (e.g., virus protection, intruder detection) drove any software growth in 2000-2001 Decreased growth in wireless and data was expected as penetration increased Local voice maket expected to remain flat, with long distance services seeing declines due to price competition Hardware will experience a rebound with the roll out of new technologies such as 3G and 802.11b 8 In addition, industries that are historically large consumers of IT and Telecom (e.g., Financial Services) were reducing their spending levels US IT and Telecom Spend as Avg % of Firm Revenue by Industry Observations 15% US IT Spend by Industry (2000) Technology has become an integral part of business operations and firms have to spend on technology upgrade and maintenance every year Reduction in spending as percentage of revenue is offset by overall increasing corporate revenues Slower growth is driving down stock prices, however long-term forecasts indicate double-digit growth Potential risk in New York City market as key local industries plan to reduce technology spend Technology Spend as a % of Revenue $ 59 B 10% $ 112 B $ 151 B 5% $ 379 B $ 67 B 0% 2000 Government Retail/Wholesale 2001 (E) Communications (1) Others 2002 (E) Financial Services (1) Other industries include Agriculture, Mining, Construction, Transportation, Utilities, IT, Petroleum, Services, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Transportation and Education Note: IT spend includes corporate expenditure on hardware, software and services expenses and telecom spend includes voice and data communication expenses. Source: Gartner Group, IDC, Economy.com, Dun & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis 9 The 9/11 events caused major infrastructure damage of ~$2B to the IT and Telecom sector… Estimated One-time Capital Losses from Event Estimated $2B in communication and utility cable/equipment repair -- $70% attributed to communications $2,500 Estimated Lossed ($MM) 50 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 2170 $500 1400 Includes replacement of cellular towers and other small replacement requirements Based on $600/sq. ft. value estimate for 140 West Street property (Verizon) 720 $0 Total Capital Losses Other Capital Losses Netw ork, Communication, Hardw are and Equipment Losses Facilities Losses Cost Categories Source: Morgan Stanley estimates, NYC Comptroller Report, news articles, BAH Analysis … other sectors lost ~$10B of technology infrastructure 10 Lower Manhattan saw a direct loss of 16 sector companies and 1,123 sector jobs Pre 9/11 Lower Manhattan IT and Telecom Sector Sub-Sector # Co.’s Jobs IT Hardware 3 49 IT Services 159 8,525 IT Software 107 5,122 Telecom Hardware 2 468 Telecom Services 92 3,944 Total 363 18,108 Listing of Sector Businesses Lost in Lower Manhattan* Sub-Sector # Co.’s Jobs IT Hardware 0 0 IT Services 8 800 IT Software 5 238 Telecom Hardware 0 0 Telecom Services 3 85 Total 16 1,123 Business Loss in Lower Manhattan IT and Telecom Sector Avesta Computer Svcs Bridge Fixed Income Svcs Careerengine Network Espeed Lindatech Metiom SRA America Thor Technologies Financial Technologies Lava Trading Optech Systems Temenos USA Thebeast.com Ati Telecom Ingress Net Interoute Telcommunications *Note: Includes companies with head offices in buildings destroyed on 9/11, in which >75% of employees worked at the head office Source: Dun & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis 11 Looking forward, planned technology spending has been postponed by six to twelve months STAGE 1 STAGE 2 STAGE 3 Reinstate Service Rationalize Installation Upgrade to New Standards • Incur large tactical emergency spend to restore basic services • Address emergency needs via “patches” to systems • Replace stopgap measures with more permanent solutions • Install new equipment and systems to match (or surpass) original upgrade plans IT Spending Original Planned Spend Revised Spend Emergency Spend 11-Sep 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 5th Qtr 6th Qtr + 12 The current downward trend in revenue growth will likely be extended for 2-3 quarters Quarterly NYC IT Revenue 10.0 Quarterly NYC Telecom Revenue 3.5% 10.0 3.5% 3.0% 8.0 2.5% 6.0 2.0% 4.0 1.5% 1.0% 2.0 0.5% 0.0 0.0% 4Q- 1Q- 2Q- 3Q- 4Q- 1Q- 2Q- 3Q- 4Q- 1Q- 2Q- 3Q- 4Q- 1Q- 2Q- 3Q- 4Q99 00 00 00 00 01 01 01 01 02 02 02 02 03 03 03 03 Post 9/11 Revenue Post 9/11 Growth Pre 9/11 Growth Revenues ($ BN) Revenues ($ BN) 3.0% 8.0 2.5% 6.0 2.0% 4.0 1.5% 1.0% 2.0 0.5% 0.0 0.0% 4Q- 1Q- 2Q- 3Q- 4Q- 1Q- 2Q- 3Q- 4Q- 1Q- 2Q- 3Q- 4Q- 1Q- 2Q- 3Q- 4Q99 00 00 00 00 01 01 01 01 02 02 02 02 03 03 03 03 Post 9/11 Revenue Post 9/11 Growth Pre 9/11 Growth Replacement of $12B technology infrastructure will be a source of revenue for the national technology sector New York City will see 2.3% (of $12B) over 6-8 quarters Source: Gartner Group, IDC, Economy.com, Dun & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis 13 The employment downturn will also be extended and a turnaround will lag revenue recovery Quarterly NYC Telecom Employment 60,000 60,000 50,000 50,000 Employees Employees Quarterly NYC IT Employment 40,000 30,000 0 4Q- 1Q- 2Q- 3Q- 4Q- 1Q- 2Q- 3Q- 4Q- 1Q- 2Q- 3Q- 4Q- 1Q- 2Q- 3Q- 4Q99 00 00 00 00 01 01 01 01 02 02 02 02 03 03 03 03 Pre 9/11 40,000 30,000 0 New Forecast 4Q- 1Q- 2Q- 3Q- 4Q- 1Q- 2Q- 3Q- 4Q- 1Q- 2Q- 3Q- 4Q- 1Q- 2Q- 3Q- 4Q99 00 00 00 00 01 01 01 01 02 02 02 02 03 03 03 03 Pre 9/11 New Forecast Rebuild efforts and temporary outsourcing service requirements limit additional layoffs Service reconnection efforts and new service connections limit additional layoffs As economy recovers, greater perceived need for decentralized IT operations and enhanced business continuity plans (particularly for FS firms) drives increased IT service and equipment demand and needed employment As economy recovers, enduring security and travel concerns cause incremental increases in data and voice service usage as well as new network technology (e.g., VPN) deployment -- driving longer term employment increases New employment recovery expected in late 2002, approximately three quarters later than originally forecasted Long term recovery now planned for late 2002, early 2003, approximately three quarters later than originally forecasted 14 Overall, the incremental impact on IT and Telecom from the 9/11 attacks is minimal relative to other sectors Key Drivers Companies replacing damaged and/or destroyed equipment will drive a temporary increase in spending in certain technology subsectors Net Incremental Impact In addition, somewhat more persistent factors (e.g., increased concerns over security, redundancy, and disaster recovery) will drive longer-term increased spending Spending on smaller, more forward-looking projects Nearly zero incremental impact -- overall economic trends continue to drive the NYC IT and Telecom sector may increase as management time is redirected from enterprisewide application upgrades/installations However, the increasingly uncertain environment created by the events will translate into a deceleration of new growth The expected recovery from slowing growth trends will be delayed 6-12 months and is widely expected to occur in late 2002 15 The IT and Telecom sector provides critical capabilities that can help support a recovery in overall NYC business Areas of Potential Contribution Provide robust levels of redundancy and survivability Develop and deploy new technologies to drive business forward Provide enhanced capacity and service levels Deploy infrastructure to enable distributed business operations Examples • Increase availability of mobile cellular banks, mobile switches, and other “quick-fix” equipment • Establish new precedents in cooperation for disaster recovery planning (e.g., system sharing, wiring blueprints, and other operational knowledge) • Work as an industry to roll out 3G and 802.11b wireless technologies in high-impact areas for business network infrastructures • Accelerate optical switching rollout to speed new business/location deployment time • Leverage new and existing network infrastructures to provide greater data transport capacity • Incorporate lessons learned from recovery efforts to set new targets/thresholds for service provisioning and repair cycle times • Install state of the art broadband infrastructure allowing distributed business operations within New York City (e.g., 16 Limits on the IT and Telecom sector’s ability to drive these innovations and improvements could impair the remainder of the NYC economy Investors are reluctant to fund high-risk ventures Newly uncertain environment restricts access to new venture capital Dangers for the remainder of the economy Available funds have been used for recovery Communications companies in particular are short of cash for new projects Customers feel insecure and vulnerable … Sense of vulnerability (on both individual and corporate levels) heightens concerns about redundancy, security … so they are reluctant to spend on new technologies … Customers are less focused on expanding offerings vs. protecting/preserving core operations … and any spend is for traditional services Technology companies cannot support cutting edge efforts • The development of new technology-dependent products/services (e.g., online brokerages) is hindered • Competition in the space is diminished potentially increasing costs and limiting innovative approaches to business • The natural redundancy of multi-carrier networks is reduced, increasing risk for all businesses Customers exhibit greater reliance on/gravitation towards proven service offerings of established players 17 To address any potential issues we developed eleven joint public and private sector actions Action Impact on NYC Primary Support 1.) Reimburse/finance the efforts of key players to rebuild while upgrading 4 2.) Help companies with capacity find customers with needs 1 Private sector 3.) Upgrade capacity and capability of communications infrastructure 4 Combined public and private sector 4.) Improve customer service, satisfaction, and customer options for communications service options 2 5.) Establish demand-side and supply-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements 4 6.) Establish new business development region with advanced technology infrastructure 2 7.) Provide mechanisms to help small technology sector companies take advantage of rebuilding spend 2 8.) Enable small companies to refocus and/or diversify to accommodate shifts in company priorities 1 9.) Support competition in communications services by educating businesses on available service alternatives 1 10.) Channel investments to technologies critical to native NYC industries 3 11.) Establish NYC as center of technology R&D by fostering climate for new technology venturing 2 0 Low Impact Combined public and private sector Combined public and private sector Private sector Combined public and private sector Combined public and private sector Private sector Combined public and private sector Private sector Public sector 4 High Impact 18 SAMPLE ACTION: Establish business and service-provider consortia to address infrastructure requirements Establish business and service-provider consortia to address infrastructure requirements Action Implementation Actions Key Costs Key Benefits Feasibility Solicit participants, from key businesses, service providers, and equipment manufacturers (e.g., Large Financial Services companies, Verizon, AT&T, Lucent, AOL) to ensure buy-iin from all key consituents Business and service provider consortia should operate jointly and independently to determine constituents specific needs Suggested agenda items: • Disaster recover and survivability planning • Capacity requirements and constraints • New technology requirements and implementation methods Suggested action-item categories: • Methods for funding potentially non-economically beneficial activities (e.g., redundancy creation) by individual members • Required / Suggested policy changes • Specific responsibilities for implementation by member companies (e.g., client corporations required to upgrade so service provider investments in new technologies will have a market) Establishment of consortia and coordination costs should incur minimal costs ~1 management-level FTE to help coordinate key players Overall Cost Estimate: $4-6MM Source of funds: Private consortia/key individual company members Enables greater infrastructure redundancy and advanced capabilities without placing undue burden on supply-side sector companies to invest capital with no expectation of reasonable return Potentially, provides valuable precedent for greater cooperation between supply-side sector companies and demand-side industries for future issues Provide forum to develop future disaster recovery plans High Cost to establish consortia is minimal, and cost to deploy redundancy should be matched as best as possible with potential for increased revenue/earnings to supply-side companies Allows greater redundancy to be built without public-sector intervention 19 SAMPLE ACTION (continued): Establish business and service provider consortia to address infrastructure requirements Sample Agenda Items Kickoff Timing Business Continuity Requirements • Infrastructure Redundancy • Data Backup • Equipment/Space Availability Advanced/Alternative Technology Capability Requirements Immediate Key Players Business Representatives from key NYC industries (e.g., Financial Services, Media) Service Providers 12-24 months Representatives from key NYC industries (e.g., Financial Services, Media) Disaster Recovery Requirements for Small Businesses Infrastructure Capacity Requirements Immediate 6-12 months Representatives from key NYC industries (e.g., Financial Services, Media) -- with representation from small players within each Representatives from key NYC industries (e.g., Financial Services, Media) Infrastructure providers (e.g., Verizon, AT&T) Business continuity service providers (e.g., SunGard) Equipment providers (e.g., IBM, EMC) Infrastructure providers (e.g., Verizon, AT&T) Equipment providers (e.g., IBM, EMC) Key new technology players (e.g., Level3) Infrastructure providers (e.g., Verizon, AT&T) Business continuity service providers (e.g., SunGard) Equipment providers (e.g., IBM, EMC) Infrastructure providers (e.g., Verizon, AT&T) Ley new technology players (e.g., Level3) 20 NYC Snapshot 21 The New York IT and Telecom sector includes a number of familiar names, along with plenty of smaller players Sector Sub-Sector SIC Code - Description 357 - Computers, Peripherals, Office Equipment Human Scale Corporation Dot Hill Systems Corporation 7371/2 - Computer related software Nutech Integrated Systems Aegis Software 7373 to 7379 - Computer related services AMC Computer Corporation Netik Inc. 366 - Communications Equipment L3 Communications Loral Space Communications 4812 - Wireless Telecom Services Verizon RSL Communications 4813 - Telecom Services Arbinet-thexchange 4822 - Telegraph and other Communications 4899 - Telecom services, not elsewhere classified Hardware IT Software Services Hardware Telecom Voice (Local & LD) Wireless Data Examples 22 The technology sector generated $37.8B* and employed nearly 97,000 people throughout New York City Information Technology Revenue, Jobs, and Companies (2000) $11.6B 52,867 Telecommunications Revenue, Jobs, and Companies (2000) 1,174 $26.2B* 100% 100% 90% 90% 80% 80% 70% 6.7 35,694 731 60% 50% 50% 29 0.6 524 70% 60% 40% 43,922 21.8 42,406 488 40% 1,506 30% 20% 30% 4.2 15,667 414 20% 10% 10% 0% 0% Revenue Software Jobs Hardware Companies Services 4.4 1,516 Revenue* Jobs Hardware 36 Companies Services *Note: Only includes revenues generated in New York City. Verizon generates an additional $61B outside of New York City Source: Dunn & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis 23 Small companies provide nearly 40% of the employment and approximately 15% of revenues NYC IT & Telecom Industry by Firm Size $100B $37.8B* 96,789 1,698 1% 100% 90% 17% 24% 80% 55% 70% 60% 83% 37% 50% 82% 40% 30% 34% 20% 39% 10% 13% 0% 4% Revenue 11% NYC-generated Revenue* Small Medium Jobs Companies Large *Note: Only includes revenues generated in New York City. Verizon generates an additional $61B outside of New York City Source: Dunn & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis 24 Most sector companies reside within Manhattan -- Lower Manhattan hosts approximately 20% of the employment Overall Distribution of IT/Telecom Firms, Jobs, and Revenue by NYC Region New York City IT and Telecom Employment (2000) $30.9B 1,131 IT 60,554 Lower Manhattan Other Manhattan Other Boroughs Hardware 49 501 956 Software 8,525 24,626 2,543 Services 5,122 10,025 520 Hardware 468 432 616 Services 3,944 24,970 13,492 18,108 60,554 18,127 Telecom Total Firms Jobs Revenue Other Manhattan New York City IT and Telecom Revenues (2000) 363 Firms 18,108 $4.0B Jobs Revenue Lower Manhattan 206 Firms 18,127 $3.0B Jobs IT Revenue Lower Manhattan Other Manhattan Other Boroughs Hardware $0.02 $0.5 $0.1 Software $1.1 $3.1 $0.07 Services $1.1 $5.4 $0.2 Hardware $0.3 $3.9 $0.2 Services $1.4 $18.0 $2.4 $4.0 $30.9 $3.0 Telecom Other Boroughs Total 25 Pre 9/11 Baseline 26 Pre-attack trends for IT and telecom showed slowing growth rates, with an anticipated rebound in Q4 2002 IT Industry Pre-9/11 Projected Annual Growth Telecom Industry Pre-9/11 Projected Annual Growth 40% Annual Telecom Revenue Growth (%) Annual IT Revenue Growth 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% 2000 2001 Software 2002 2003 Services 2004 2005 Expect steady 8-10% longterm growth for wireless 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% 2000 Hardware 2001 2002 2003 2004 Telecom Hardware Voice Data Wireless 2005 Source: IDC, Gartner Group, Economy.com, BAH Analysis New technology purchases drive the IT Hardware market, creating greater sensitivity to slowing corporate IT spend and a general economic downturn Outsourcing, maintenance, and other short-term fixed IT spend areas support the service sector, limiting its exposure to economic downturns Emphasis on security systems (e.g., virus protection, intruder detection) drove any software growth in 2000-2001 Decreased growth in wireless and data was expected as penetration increased Local voice maket expected to remain flat, with long distance services seeing declines due to price competition Hardware will experience a rebound with the roll out of new technologies such as 3G and 802.11b 27 Prior to the 9/11 attacks, the IT hardware subsector was on a downward trend, with software and services experiencing slowed growth Subsector Trend Drivers Hardware Software Services Company Size Trend Large Shift in spending was away from discretionary software Security was already a priority for many companies Spending levels are maintained by long-term contracts and need to upgrade Outsourcing services benefited as companied sought to reduce costs Companies delivering discretionary services (e.g. customer software development) saw the greatest slowdown Drivers Small Corporate IT spending trends play a major role Key consumers of technology were slowing overall capital expenditures Slowdown in consumer spending affects PC market Smaller firms felt disproportionately large impact from economic slowdown Funding for new ventures had become scarce Many large firms had begun to lay off workers to maintain profitability A return to growth was expected in 2002 Detailed subsector-specific trend data is included in Appendix A 28 In the telecom sector, well-capitalized incumbent wireless service providers drove pre-9/11 growth while the hardware sector was in a decline Subsector Trend Drivers Hardware Wireless (voice) Wireline voice (LD&IXC) Data Company Size Slowdowns in corporate spending limited once-high growth Large providers that had planned for continued explosive growth faced an inventory glut Failures/bankruptcies in several sectors (e.g., CLECs) placed strains on vendor financing activities Trends from Europe and Japan indicated wireless services would weather the economic slowdown well Slowdown in growth was a consequence of increased penetration rather than economic conditions Increasing ARPU offset slowdown in new subscribers Markets were nearly 100% saturated and facing cutthroat price competition Growth was extremely limited Growth in high-bandwidth services was driven by constantly increasing data requiremens and advanced internet applicaitons CLEC and competitive player failures were becoming increasingly common, but incumbents continued to perform well Trend Drivers Small Large Smaller firms felt disproportionately large impact from economic slowdown Funding for new ventures had become scarce Large telecom firms (e.g., Verizon) experiencing increased profit margins Medium size wireless carriers were having trouble accessing capital for growth Voice continued to experience margin pressure Data services were growing Detailed subsector-specific trend data is included in Appendix A 29 Impact Assessment 30 Emphasis on infrastructure integrity and security will help lessen the decline and hasten the rebound in the IT and Telecom sector Overall, the IT and telecom sector in NYC is expected to see an immediate reduction in growth rates for the next two quarters before recovering to pre-9/11 levels by the end of 2002 • Opportunity for stronger players to consolidate their position • Challenge for small business to survive this slump IT hardware will likely continue on a downward trend until the overall economy recovers • Spending on subsector is driven by overall economic trends • The impact on the NYC economy is small relative to other sectors Multiyear contracts will help IT services firms avoid the impact of 9/11 in the near term • Changes in spending priorities and habits will not be immediately felt as existing long-term contracts must be “served out” • Certain services provided are fundamental to business operations (e.g., data center operations) and cannot be easily curtailed in the short term Software manufacturers could begin to see negative growth in the short-term • NYC based clients are likely to spend less on software • Majority of the software companies are small firms and may not be able to absorb several quarters of reduced revenues 31 The immediate capital loss from the 9/11 attack is estimated at ~$2B, comprised primarily of facilities & equipment Estimated One-time Capital Losses from Event Estimated $2B in communication and utility cable/equipment repair -- $70% attributed to communications $2,500 Estimated Lossed ($MM) 50 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 2170 $500 1400 Includes replacement of cellular towers and other small replacement requirements Based on $600/sq. ft. value estimate for 140 West Street property (Verizon) 720 $0 Total Capital Losses Other Capital Losses Netw ork, Communication, Hardw are and Equipment Losses Facilities Losses Cost Categories Source: Morgan Stanley estimates, NYC Comptroller Report, news articles, BAH Analysis … Other sectors lost ~$10B of technology infrastructure 32 Overall, the incremental impact on IT and Telecom from the 9/11 attacks is minimal relative to other sectors… Key Drivers Companies replacing damaged and/or destroyed equipment will drive a temporary increase in spending in certain technology subsectors Net Incremental Impact In addition, somewhat more persistent factors (e.g., increased concerns over security, redundancy, and disaster recovery) will drive longer-term increased spending Spending on smaller, more forward-looking projects may increase as management time is redirected from enterprisewide application upgrades/installations Nearly zero short-term incremental impact -- overall economic trends continue to drive the NYC IT and Telecom sector, and could result in slower long-term growth However, the increasingly uncertain environment created by the events will translate into a deceleration of new growth The expected recovery from slowing growth trends will be delayed 6-12 months and is widely expected to occur in late 2002 33 … but limits on the IT and Telecom sector’s ability to drive innovations could impair the remainder of the NYC economy Investors are reluctant to fund high-risk ventures Newly uncertain environment restricts access to new venture capital Dangers for the remainder of the economy Available funds have been used for recovery Communications companies in particular are short of cash for new projects Customers feel insecure and vulnerable … Sense of vulnerability (on both individual and corporate levels) heightens concerns about redundancy, security … so they are reluctant to spend on new technologies … Customers are less focused on expanding offerings vs. protecting/preserving core operations … and any spend is for traditional services Technology companies cannot support cutting edge efforts • The development of new technology-dependent products/services (e.g., online brokerages) is hindered • Competition in the space is diminished potentially increasing costs and limiting innovative approaches to business • The natural redundancy of multi-carrier networks is reduced, increasing risk for all businesses Customers exhibit greater reliance on/gravitation towards proven service offerings of established players 34 Although Lower Manhattan is home to 363 sector companies, their business base was not severely impacted by 9/11 Pre 9/11 Lower Manhattan IT and Telecom Sector Sub-Sector # Co.’s Jobs IT Hardware 3 49 IT Services 159 8,525 IT Software 107 5,122 Telecom Hardware 2 468 Telecom Services 92 3,944 Total 363 18,108 Listing of Sector Businesses Lost in Lower Manhattan* Sub-Sector # Co.’s Jobs IT Hardware 0 0 IT Services 8 800 IT Software 5 238 Telecom Hardware 0 0 Telecom Services 3 85 Total 16 1,123 Business Loss in Lower Manhattan IT and Telecom Sector Avesta Computer Svcs Bridge Fixed Income Svcs Careerengine Network Espeed Lindatech Metiom SRA America Thor Technologies Financial Technologies Lava Trading Optech Systems Temenos USA Thebeast.com Ati Telecom Ingress Net Interoute Telcommunications *Note: Includes companies with head offices in buildings destroyed on 9/11, in which >75% of employees worked at the head office Source: Dun & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis 35 Rebuilding efforts support the technology sector – estimates indicate $8B of technology infrastructure must be replaced by former WTC occupants WTC Towers, Tenants by Floors and Employees, 9/10/01 Observations 1 WTC Company Sandler O'Neill AON Fiduciary Trust American Bureau of Shipping Washington Group Keefe, Bruyette & Woods NYS DOT&F Harris Beach Euro Brokers/Maxcor Fuji Bank Morgan Stanley Bridge Info Sys ICAP Fireman's Fund Wachovia/First Union Thatcher Proffitt & Wood Frankel & Co. Oppenheimer Funds Sun Microsystems Scor-US 2 WTC Emp 177 1100 645 16 190 171 222 113 285 625 3500 284 500 190 48 300 213 598 300 120 Floors 0.5 9 4 0.5 0.5 2 2 1 1 4 17 2 2 2 1 3 1.5 5 2 1.5 Company Windows on the World Cantor Fitzgerald Marsh & McLennan Fred Alger Mgmt Carr Futures Ohrenstein & Brown Network Plus Port Authority Dai-Ichi Kangyo Bank Lehman Brothers Kemper Insurance Empire Blue Cross ICAP Bank of America Emp Floors 70 1000 3200 55 141 91 46 2000 300 618 234 1914 250 400 UNKNOWN: Who will leave NYC? 2 3 8 1.5 1.5 1 1 23 3 3 2 10 1 3 A significant portion of the companies within the WTC are large-sized firms (500+ employees) Not considering those with significant lost employees, these firms are likely to require significant additional IT and telecom spending outlays to set up operations elsewhere These IT and telecom expenditures can be expected to mostly go to NYC-based IT firms Companies with greater than 500 employees within WTC Source: NYC Comptroller Report 36 Technology subsectors taken individually see minimal net incremental impact of the attacks Sub-Sector General IT Telecom Capital Loss Incremental Impact* Short Term Long Term Short-t ($2.17B)m IT Hardware (0.5%) (0.2%) IT Software (1.3%) 0.1% IT Services (1.6%) 0.2% Telecom Hardware Wireless (0.7%) (0.2%) 0.1% 0.1% Local Voice (0.05%) 0.0% Long Distance Voice Data - Telephony - Cable (0.05%) 0.0% (1.5%) 0.2% Qualitative Incremental Impact Moderate short term revenue gain – initial repair/replacement of damaged infrastructure will drive near-term revenues; long-term infrastructure development will take 18 to 24 months and drive slower but more sustained revenue growth Increase in revenue from rebuild spending will be counterweighed by general spending slowdown Rebuild spending and new investment in selected infrastructure/operations capabilities (e.g., security, video conf., remote access) will come primarily as a shift in spend away from typical growth areas (ERP, CRM, etc) Rebuild spending in selected outsourced services (e.g., data center) and new investment in key business continuity planning/services will come primarily as a shift away from discretionary spending on services Increase in revenue from rebuild spending will be counterweighed by general spending slowdown Increase in revenue from usage and customer growth as a result of security/ travel concerns Small increase in revenue from videoconferencing and/or telecommutingrelated usage will only slightly offset declining voice market Small increase in revenue from videoconferencing and/or telecommutingrelated usage will only slightly offset declining voice market Short-term revenue shortfalls from service interruptions counterweighed by new service connections due to relocations Minimal one-time revenue decrease due to loss of customers and business activity *Note: Impact figures defined as difference between pre-9/11 growth levels and base scenario post-9/11 growth levels, one quarter and eight quarters beyond 3Q-01 for short-term and long-term, respectively Detailed projections are provided in Appendix B 37 Actions 38 After analyzing the impact to the sector, we developed four imperatives and associated actions to mitigate the effects Imperatives Rebuild World-Class Infrastructure Key Actions Accelerate restoration of communications infrastructure • Reimburse/finance rebuilding of damaged infrastructure • Leverage opportunities to deploy “leapfrogging” technologies Build the broadband infrastructure to support multiple centers of business around New York City (e.g., Lower Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, Upper Manhattan) Collaborate for the Future Create industry-specific demand-side and supply-side consortia (e.g., Financial Services, Communications Services) • Develop current and future industry-wide infrastructure requirements (e.g., redundancy, availability, capacity) and the plans to implement • Establish clear communication of priorities to suppliers (equipment and services) • Coordinate new technology implementation efforts (e.g., mesh networks, 3G, etc) among multiple service providers • Leverage existing industry consortia to extent possible (e.g., SIAC) Make NYC Better for Small Business Establish new business development zone(s) throughout NYC • Identify and prioritize prospective areas for development • Deploy advanced technology infrastructure, targeted toward small-business requirements Nurture Innovation and Foster Competition Establish industry-wide commitment to develop innovative technologies • Channel greater investment to new technologies enabling new business platforms • Provide public sector support where possible to encourage development and deployment of new technologies (e.g., 3G, 802.11b, mesh networks) 39 We developed specific actions, using four key imperatives that drive the IT and Telecom sector’s ability to support a NYC recovery Imperative Description Rebuild World-Class Infrastructure Collaborate for the Future Make NYC Better for Small Business Potential Benefits Replace one-time capital losses suffered by the industry as a result of the 9/11 events Drive the NYC infrastructure forward by upgrading it where possible Develop ongoing mechanism to determine technology requirements of different industries and NYC economy as a whole Establish cooperative environment for technology players to work with customers to provide best solutions to address requirements Provide resources to ensure the viability of small businesses within NYC, both within and outside of the technology sector Nurture Innovation and Foster Competition Facilitate the development of new technologies on an ongoing basis Create an environment to encourage the exploration of new products and services Provides short-term financial support to sector companies experiencing significant infrastructure damage Restores IT/Telecom services and infrastructure while instituting higher levels of customer service Enables greater infrastructure redundancy and advanced capabilities without placing undue burden on supply-side sector companies to invest capital with no expectation of reasonable return Potentially, provides valuable precedent for greater cooperation between supply-side sector companies and demand-side industries for future issues Allows small companies to leverage leading technologies in operations and/or service offerings Provides key selling point for NYC to potential small business community members, vs. other regions Encourages development/testing of innovative technologies on limited basis within NYC Provides continued funding to high-growth areas, to ensure industry is not “left behind” by faster players elsewhere Helps to retain skilled high-tech talent pool within NYC area 40 Eleven actions emerged across the imperatives Imperatives Rebuild World-Class Infrastructure Actions 1.) Reimburse/finance the efforts of key players to rebuild or repair damaged/destroyed infrastructure, getting NYC services “back to normal” while upgrading current infrastructure 2.) Help companies with capacity find customers with needs -- support customer access to key providers/subcontractors for short-term requirements 3.) Upgrade capacity and capability of communications infrastructure 4.) Improve customer service, satisfaction, and customer options for communications services 5a.) Establish demand-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements Collaborate for the Future Make NYC Better for Small Business Nurture Innovation and Foster Competition 5b.) Establish supply-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements 6.) Establish new business development region with advanced technology infrastructure 7.) Provide mechanisms to help small technology sector companies take advantage of rebuilding spend 8.) Enable small companies to refocus and/or diversify to accommodate shifts in company priorities 9.) Support competition in communication services by educating businesses on available service alternatives 10.) Channel investments to technologies critical to native NYC industries 11.) Establish NYC as center of technology R&D by fostering a climate for new technology venturing 41 Four actions stand out as the highest priority, with potentially enduring benefits and high feasibility Imperatives Actions 1.) Reimburse/finance rebuilding … Rebuild WorldClass Infrastructure 2.) Help companies with capacity find … 3.) Upgrade capacity and capability … 4.) Improve customer service, satisfaction … 5a.) Establish demand-side consortia … Collaborate for the Future 5b.) Establish supply-side consortia … 6.) Establish new business development … Make NYC Better for Small Business 7.) Provide mechanisms to help small … 8.) Enable small companies to refocus … Highest-Priority Actions 1.) Reimburse/finance the efforts of key players to rebuild or repair damaged/destroyed infrastructure, getting NYC services “back to normal” while upgrading current infrastructure 5a.) Establish demand-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements 5b.) Establish supply-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements 6.) Establish new business development region with advanced technology infrastructure 9.) Support competition in communications … Nurture Innovation and Foster Competition 10.) Channel investments to technologies … 10.) Channel investments to technologies critical to native NYC industries 11.) Establish NYC as center of … Each of the actions is discussed in detail in Appendix C 42 Methodology and Assumptions 43 At each stage of analysis, we validated hypotheses with multiple credible sources Description Section NYC Snapshot Pre 9/11 Baseline Leveraged Dun & Bradstreet database of NYC companies identified by SIC code Gathered key information for these companies including employee and revenue figures Isolated Lower Manhattan companies by zip code Developed profile of the technology sector, segmented by size and subsector IDC Gartner Group Economy.com Projections based on external sources and overall economic drivers Key factor is planned IT spend at major companies Incorporated interview results (industry executives, analysts, investment experts) where possible Utilized three forecast scenarios (Base, Pessimistic, Optimistic) Incorporated interview results (industry executives, analysts, investment experts) where possible Developed and incorporated subsector-specific assumptions where appropriate (discussed within Impact section) Impact Initiatives Developed set of candidate initiatives by: • Tapping internal resources within BA&H (both within and external to project team) • Identifying key prospective actions suggested in research resources Added to and refined this set based on interview feedback 44 Our sources included interviews with over 30 individuals, including large and small companies as well as sector experts Interviewees Organization Accenture Accenture Accenture Aegis Software Inc AMC Corporation Arbinet-thexchange AT&T AT&T Avaya Bear Stearns CIBC ConEd Communications CSFB Global Crossing IBM Inforocket.com Lucent Lucent Lucent Lucent MSDW MSDW Netik Inc Nutech Integ. Sys. Probe Research RCN RRE Ventures Siemens Corporation Verizon Verizon Verizon Verizon Warburg Pincus Name Bill Andrews Steve Phillips Mark Tillinger Andrew Serrel Mark Romanowski Mike Lemberg Michael Armstrong Reed Harrison Don Peterson Rich Lukaj Gary Rabin Peter Rust Todd Raker David Carey Gus Maikish Susan N. John Heindel Dave Dial Nick DeTura Bob Holder Luis Carvalho Rich Bilotti Pam Cytron Jessica Kowalick Allan Tumolillo Ed Kuczma Jim Robinson IV Klaus Kleinfeld Bob Ingalls David Pitcher Bruce Gordon Paul Crotty Stewart Gross Title/Level Associate Partner Partner Partner, Capital Markets Group Leader Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer Director CEO Senior VP, Local Service & Network CEO Senior MD Senior MD CEO Managing Director Senior VP, Global Network Managing Director Executive Vice President President, Worldwide Svcs Product Management VP Global Program Mgmt VP Executive Vice President Managing Director Managing Director Executive Vice President Controller Analyst, Telecom VP, GM Manhattan Ops Director COO President, Bus. Solns. Grp. Corporate Economist President, Retail Markets Group President, NY & CT Senior MD 45 We analyzed the data from these sources to arrive at our projected estimates… Projection Development Framework IDC Growth Rates Gartner Group Revenues BAH Growth Analysis Economy.com 2000 Revenues Analyst Reports National revenue projections Compute national % growth trends Adjust national trends to New York City trends % of spend Elasticity for growth Population Base Revenue & Projections Dun & Bradstreet Report IDC BAH Gartner Group Employment Employment Reports Analysis National growth projections NYC Comptroller Reports Growth Rates Employment Projections Dun & Bradstreet data New York city relationship to national projections Job Loss reports (newspapers, reports) in New York City 46 … in the context of the three standard scenarios established by the Core Team Impact Scenarios Assumptions Scenario Base Pessimistic Unclear implications of conflict Recession in Q3 and Q4 2001 due to declining consumer confidence Implications Market expectations of industry growth rates over the next few years considering the impact of 9/11 attacks Recovery in Q1 2002 Further reduction in growth rates following the 9/11 attacks but recovery time is expected to be the same Economic depression with 4 consecutive declining quarters Plunging consumer confidence stays low Deeper plunge in growth rates followed in some cases by a longer wait time for the growth rates to turn around Escalation of hostilities with lingering fear “Best-case” scenario Conflict primarily resolved and/or clarified in short term Technology sector demonstrates immediate comeback Growth rates continue to rise but at a slower pace than in the early 1990s Optimistic Consumer confidence rejuvenated Downturn subdued 47 A three-stage recovery spending framework drove the development of post-9/11 trajectories for each scenario STAGE 1 STAGE 2 STAGE 3 Reinstate Service Rationalize Installation Upgrade to New Standards • Incur large tactical emergency spend to restore basic services • Address emergency needs via “patches” to systems • Replace stopgap measures with more permanent solutions • Install new equipment and systems to match (or surpass) original upgrade plans IT Spend Original Planned Spend Revised Spend Emergency Spend 11-Sep 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 5th Qtr 6th Qtr 48 New York City’s historically close tracking of national growth rates guided the sector trajectories US and New York City GDP Growth Rates Observations 10% Rebuilding expense and a lower starting point were expected to drive growth rates - San Francisco and Tokyo earthquakes have witnessed such returns in their growth rates following the initial downturn This rise is expected to arrive after a 3 or 4 quarter time lag as the rebuilding spend trickles throught he economy New York city economy has grown faster than the national average in boom cycles and this trend is expected to continue in the next boom phase GDP Growth 8% 6% NYC USA 4% 2% 0% 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001E 2002E 2003E 2004E 2005E -2% -4% Source: Economy.com, Bureau of Economic Analysis, BAH Analysis 49 New redundancy communications requirements and rebuilding spend should help move technology out of the decline Description Drivers Additional Security/Redundancy New remote communication needs Rebuilding Activities Demand to create additional redundancy infrastructure drives most technology subsectors (hardware, software, services) exception being telecom services Industries like postal services, airlines will increase their technology spending on security and redundancy needs Industries which have traditionally been high consumers of technology will also reevaluate their budgets to increase their spend on security/redundancy Drive to decentralize key information will lead to increased implementation of remote communications solutions Some larger players may acquire small companies with proprietary technologies apply marketing $ supported by brand name to grow the market for these services Increase in telecommuting needs will increase demand for services like home offices and video conferencing $10-12B flowing into technology sector -- $230-275 MM in New York specific companies Rebuilding spend and a lower starting point were expected to drive growth rates e.g., San Francisco and Tokyo earthquakes led to an immediate downturn in the regioanl economies, but rebuilding spend resulted drove a quick rebound in growth rates 50 The “inertia” of maintenance vs. new IT spending is another factor – reductions come most readily from trimming new technology purchases Discussion IT Spend Reduction Scenario IT spend dedicated to maintenance purposes (e.g., HW maintenance, support) is relatively “uncompressible” -- spending requirements are relatively unchangeable in the short term When overall IT spend faces reduction pressures (e.g., economic downturn, uncertainty), spend typically must come from the New IT spend while Maintenance IT spend continues The New IT spend area is most closely related with the Hardware and Software subsectors, moreso than with the Services subsector Effect on Different Spend Types 0.48 0.52 0.32 0.48 Maintenance New Spend Total =1.0 Total =0.8 51 We considered IT industry perspectives that despite corporate spending pullbacks, long-term growth is inevitable US IT and Telecom Spend as Avg % of Firm Revenue by Industry 15% Technology Spend as a % of Revenue US IT Spend by Industry (2000) Observations Technology has become an integral part of business operations and firms have to spend on technology upgrade and maintenance every year Reduction in spending as % of revenue is offset by overall increasing corporate revenues Slower growth is driving down stock prices, however long-term forecasts indicate double-digit growth Potential risk in New York City market as key local industries plan to reduce technology spend $ 59 B 10% $ 112 B $ 151 B 5% $ 379 B $ 67 B 0% 2000 Government Retail/Wholesale 2001 (E) Communications (1) Others 2002 (E) Financial Services (1) Other industries include Agriculture, Mining, Construction, Transportation, Utilities, IT, Petroleum, Services, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Transportation and Education. Note: IT spend includes corporate expenditure on hardware, software and services expenses and telecom spend includes voice and data communication expenses. Source: Gartner Group, IDC, Economy.com, Dun & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis 52 A simple risk-return framework enabled a prioritization of the actions Prioritization Framework Hi Identify participants and Pursue with multiple implement immediately partners or as an industry to reduce risks Potential Return (Financial) Pick low hanging fruit Avoid as private firms -- and implement public sector may fund if societal benefits exist Lo Lo Hi Complexity and Sensitivity 53 Utilizing this framework revealed that actions fostering cooperation deliver the highest return with the least complexity Prioritization of Actions Actions Hi 5a/b 1 3 10 6 Potential Return (Financial) 4 2 9 11 7 8 Lo Lo Complexity and Sensitivity Hi 1.) Reimburse/finance efforts of key players to rebuild while upgrading infrastructure 2.) Help companies with capacity find customers with needs -support customer access to key providers/subcontractors for short-term requirements 3.) Upgrade capacity and capability of communications infrastructure 4.) Improve customer service, satisfaction, and customer options for communications services 5a.) Establish demand-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements 5b.) Establish supply-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements 6.) Establish new business development region with advanced technology infrastructure 7.) Provide mechanisms to help small technology sector companies take advantage of rebuilding spend 8.) Enable small companies to refocus and/or diversify to accommodate shifts in company priorities 9.) Support competition in communication services by educating businesses on available service alternatives 10.) Channel investments to technologies critical to native NYC industries 11.) Establish NYC as center of technology R&D by fostering a climate for new technology venturing Note: Size of bubble indicates relative impact on NYC businesses Shading indicates highest priority actions 54 To evaluate funding sources for the actions, we strove to ensure primary beneficiaries provide the majority of the investment Funding Framework Community Building Initiatives Public Combined Initiatives Joint Private Corporate Self-Help Initiatives Private Joint Public Little economic benefit for individual firms investing in these initiatives Long-term horizon for benefits realization; e.g., 6-7 years Typically focused on overall infrastructure improvements (e.g., universal connectivity, public transit) Community benefits are indirect or a result of companies in the New York City area competing more effectively Public sector provides incentives or funding to increase economic viability of projects for individual companies/groups of companies Profit potential for individual companies, however long lead times limit corporate investment Investments return tangible returns for participants Private companies will undertake these projects since they result in shareholder value creation May need encouragement from demand side consortia to ensure demand for new products or services provided 55 The highest-priority actions should be private-sector or jointly funded Funding Framework Community Building Initiatives Public Combined Initiatives 11.) Establish NYC as center of technology R&D by fostering a climate for new technology venturing 1.) Reimburse/finance efforts of key players to rebuild while upgrading infrastructure 3.) Upgrade capacity and capability of communications infrastructure 4.) Improve customer service, satisfaction, and customer options for communications services 6.) Establish new business development region with advanced technology infrastructure 7.) Provide mechanisms to help small technology sector companies take advantage of rebuilding spend 9.) Support competition in communication services by educating businesses on available service alternatives 2.) Help companies with capacity find customers with needs -- support customer access to key providers/subcontractors for short-term requirements Enable small companies to refocus and/or diversify to accommodate shifts in company priorities Both 8.) Private Corporate Self-Help Initiatives 5a.) Establish demand-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements 5b.) Establish supply-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements Channel investments to technologies critical to native NYC industries 10.) Private Both Public Primary Funding Source Note: Actions in bold indicate highest priority 56 Appendices A. Subsector Pre-9/11 Baseline Trends B. Subsector Post-9/11 Projections C. Detailed Actions 57 Appendix A. Subsector Pre-9/11 Baseline Trends 58 The IT hardware market sensitivity to the overall economy will result in reduced revenues for 2001 – recovery is expected by 2002 IT Hardware Annual Revenue Annual IT Hardware Revenue $ (BN) $1.0 $0.8 NYC market represents 0.50% of national market Pre-9/11 Observations PC market is saturated, traditional drivers of growth are no longer applicable (e.g., enterprise desktop roll-out) PC makers depend on increasing demands of advanced software packages and peripherals to drive growth (e.g., Windows XP, video conferencing) Spending on storage subsystems will not see a downturn as information revolution and internet expansion will continue to drive spending on network-related storage products Servers were expected to see a quick rebound driven by the ongoing need to build greater redundancy $0.6 $0.4 $0.2 $0.0 1999 2000 2001E 2002E 2003E 2004E 2005E IT Hardware Annual Revenue Growth Annual IT Hardware Revenue Growth (%) 20% 15% 10% Storage 5% Servers 0% PC -5% -10% -15% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Source: Gartner Group, IDC, Economy.com, Dun & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis 59 Security systems support continued double digit growth for the software sector with enterprise applications driving future growth NYC market represents 4.4% of national market IT Software Annual Revenue and Growth Rate $9 25.0% Annual IT Software Revenue $ (BN) $6.9 $7 20.0% $6.2 $6 $5.4 15.0% $4.7 $5 $4.2 $3.8 10.0% $3 $2 5.0% $1 $0 Annual IT Software Revenue Growth (%) $7.7 $8 $4 Pre-9/11 Observations Current slowing growth trends attributable to three key factors: – Slow down in PC spending – Halt in corporate upgrades with announcement of Windows XP – Loss of fascination with ‘e-’ trends Security systems (e.g., firewalls, login, etc.) continue to be the number one priority for corporate IT departments Enterprise applications such as ERP and CRM drove previous growth and will continue to drive growth in the future 0.0% 1999 2000 2001E 2002E 2003E Revenue 2004E 2005E Revenue Growth Source: Gartner Group, Economy.com, IDC, Dun & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis 60 Demand for IT Services was expected to continue growing but at a slower pace than the mid 1990’s NYC market represents 2.1% of national market IT Services Annual Revenue and Growth Rate $14 Long-term outsourcing contracts provide steady source of revenue for sector Several failures in the Internet space limited 2000 growth Pent up demand for IT projects (e.g., systems integration, CRM, supply chain services) is expected to help growth in 2002 Large service firms (e.g., IBM, EDS) growth easily counters smaller companies 20.0% $10.3 $10 $9.2 $8.3 15.0% $7.5 $8 $6.7 $6.1 $6 10.0% $4 Annual IT Services Revenue Growth (%) $11.4 $12 Annual IT Services Revenue $ (BN) Pre-9/11 Observations $2 $0 5.0% 1999 2000 2001E 2002E 2003E 2004E 2005E Revenue Revenue Growth Source: Gartner Group, IDC, Dun & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis 61 Corporate IT spending reductions hurt the high-dollar communications hardware industry NYC market represents 3.7% of national market Network Hardware Annual Revenue and Growth Rate Marginal impact on New York City since none of the major manufacturers have significant operations in the city Equipment manufacturers exacerbated demand-side issues with over production (for aggressive growth) resulting in large inventories Revenues will continue to grow slowly or see negative growth for one to two years driven by the time required to absorb excess inventory Current economic climate prevents many service providers from accessing capital markets to fund expansion Continued margin pressure is expected as customers continue to reduce IT spending 30.0% $4.3 15.0% $4.4 $4.3 $4.2 $3.9 $4 $4.0 0.0% $3.9 -15.0% $3 Annual Network Hardware Revenue Growth (%) Annual Network Hardware Revenue $ (BN) $5 Pre-9/11 Observations -30.0% 1999 2000 2001E 2002E 2003E 2004E 2005E Revenue Revenue Growth Source: Gartner Group, US Census Bureau , BAH Analysis 62 Local and LD Voice revenue continues to decline due to ongoing price competition and wireless substitutes NYC market represents 2.8% of national market Voice Services Annual Revenue Annual Voice Services Revenue $ (BN) $6 Observations $4 Long distance price competition is eroding revenue streams across the industry Consumers and businesses continue to adopt wireless, pagers, and email as substitutes for phone calls $0 2000 2001E 2002E 2003E Local 2004E 2005E LD (IXC) Voice Services Annual Revenue Growth 20% Annual Voice Services Revenue Growth (%) $2 10% 0% -10% 2000 2001 Growth local 2002 2003 2004 2005 Growth LD (IXC) Source: JP Morgan H&Q and McKinsey& Co. Joint Study, BAH Analysis 63 High penetration levels limit new wireless subscriber growth, with rising revenues per user sustaining most carriers NYC market represents 2.8% of national market Wireless Services Annual Revenue and Growth Rate Increased penetration reduces historically high growth rates 20.0% Hybrid cellular services will drive wireless revenue growth $4 15.0% • By 2005, 70% of users will have hybrid service up from the current 39% $3 $2 $1.7 $1.9 $2.0 $2.4 $2.2 10.0% $1.4 Growth (%) Annual Wireless Services Revenues $ (BN) 25.0% $5 Pre-9/11 Observations • Hybrid service fees are 30% more than the wireless average 3G applications and adoption of fixed wireless will help drive future revenue growth New wireless applications (e.g., BlueTooth) may form the future communications backbone 5.0% $1 0.0% $0 2000 2001E Revenue 2002E 2003E Revenue Growth 2005E 2004E ARPU Growth Note: Wireless revenues includes only voice service revenues Source: IDC, US Census Bureau, Morgan Stanley Dean Wittier, BAH Analysis 64 Recent CLEC failures have dampened the broadband picture, however data revenues are growing Annual Data Services Revenues $ (BN) Data Services Annual Revenue Pre-9/11 Observations $4 Data services are a new market and therefore experiencing explosive growth rates - slower future growth is expected Most of the increased revenues will be captured by the incumbents $3 $2 $1 $0 2000 2001E Broadband 2002E 2003E Cable 2004E DSL/ISDN • Industry consolidation acquired revenues 2005E ISP • Lack of funding to unprofitable players Annual Data Services Revenues Growth (%) Data Services Annual Revenue Growth 100% 80% Note: target growth rates for 2005 in the 1520% range 60% Many CLEC business models were inoperable and most never achieved profitability Future expansions are limited by restricted access to capital 40% 20% 0% 2001 2002 Broadband Source: Gartner Group, BAH Analysis 2003 Cable 2004 DSL/ISDN 2005 ISP 65 Appendix B. Subsector Post-9/11 Projections 66 IT Hardware: Aggressive reconstruction fosters a return to quarterly growth New York City Quarterly PC Sub-Sector Revenue Growth Quarterly PC Revenue Growth (%) 10% Post-9/11 Observations 5% Any significant corporate moves to locations outside the city will limit growth potential PC growth driven by companies relocating within city and replacing lost hardware Additional servers from redundancy and security requirements Technology advances in out-years will accelerate hardware growth Significant spend in this sector will go to companies outside NYC 0% -5% -10% 2000 2001E 2003E New York City Quarterly Server Sub-Sector Revenue Growth 10% Quarterly Server Revenue Growth (%) 2002E 5% 10% 5% 0% 0% -5% -5% Q1 Q32000 Q1 Q3 2001E Q1 Q3 Pre 9/11 Source: IDC’, Economy.com, BAH Analysis Base 2002E Q1 Q3 2003E Pessimistic Optimistic 67 IT Software: New York City software sector revenues will grow when the banking sector increases IT spend New York City Quarterly Software Sub-Sector Revenue Growth Post-9/11 Observations Quarterly Software Revenue Growth (%) 10% Annual growth still below the high 20% range of the 1990s 5% Security systems (e.g., virus protection, advanced login services) were already a high priority for business customers Redundancy and backup software expected to be major sources of growth Additional spending on enterprise software likely to be limited NYC software recovery dependent on banking sector – many small software firms develop specialized banking applicaitons 0% 10% 5% 0% -5% -5% 2000 Q1 Q3 Q1 2001E Q3 Q1 Pre 9/11 Source: IDC’, Economy.com, BAH Analysis 2002E Q3 Base Q1 2003E Q3 Pessimistic Optimistic 68 IT Services: Expect continued growth after an initial slowdown New York City Quarterly Services Sub-Sector Revenue Growth Post-9/11 Observations Quarterly Services Revenue Growth (%) 10% 5% 0% 10% Spend shifting to security and reliability since mid-1999 due to Y2K preparation, and new viruses (e.g., Melissa virus) Opportunities for service companies exist in all economic environments -- key factor is ability to switch service offerings quickly After being delayed, in 2003 business process improvement related srevices (e.g., CRM) will drive growth 5% 0% -5% 2001E 2000 -5% Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Pre 9/11 Source: IDC’, Economy.com, BAH Analysis 2002E Q3 Base Q1 2003E Q3 Pessimistic Optimistic 69 Telecom Hardware: Creation of a more serviceable, robust, and redundant data infrastructure will drive telecom hardware growth New York City Quarterly Telecom Hardware Sub-Sector Revenue Growth Post-9/11 Observations Sector affected by limited availability of capital markets funding for wireless, CLEC, or internet-related expansions Rebuilding initiatives will require significant amounts of high-end telecom equipment New priorities on redundancy and disaster recovery will further drive sales Clearing inventory will delay company benefits from rebuilding sales 10% Quarterly Telecom Hardware Revenue Growth (%) ‘95 to ‘99 growth rates averaged ~16% 5% 0% 10% 5% 0% -5% 2001E 2000 -5% Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Pre 9/11 Source: IDC, Economy.com, BAH Analysis 2002E Q3 Base Q1 2003E Q3 Pessimistic Optimistic 70 Telecom Voice: Voice will not grow, though losses may occur if customer migration out of the city occurs New York City Voice Sub-Sector Quarterly Revenue Growth Post-9/11 Observations Voice service revenues unaffected by attack - loss from service disruptions is minimal compared to base volumes Some increase from additional video conferencing or telecommuniting, however these increases will be too small to affect the overall base New York sector will be hurt if significant movement of telecom intensive industries (banking, real estate, wholesale) occurs Continued (and increased) substitution of wireless VOIP and other technologies further erodes revenues here Potential for companies to stick with larger players (e.g., Verizon) in the short run, limiting the erosion Quarterly Voice Revenue Growth (%) 5% 0% 10% 5% 0% -5% 2001E 2000 -5% Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Pre 9/11 Q1 Q3 Base Source: IDC, Economy.com, BAH Analysis 2002E Q1 2003E Q3 Pessimistic Optimistic 71 Telecom Wireless: Growth is dependent on 3G deployment New York City Quarterly Wireless Sub-Sector Revenue Growth Post-9/11 Observations Quarterly Wireless Revenue Growth (%) 6% 4% Medium to long term growth is dependent on next-generation / 3G roll out (higher bandwidth enables new services; e.g., 802.11b, Bluetooth, fixed wireless) Access to capital for expansion in these areas was already limited, the attacks will delay a greater opening of the capital markets to most providers Minor increases in usage as a result of the attacks will not impact overall sector National players (e.g., Sprint, SBC) still growing 2% 10% 5% 0% 0% 2001E 2000 -5% Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Pre 9/11 Source: IDC, Economy.com, BAH Analysis 2002E Q3 Base Q1 2003E Q3 Pessimistic Optimistic 72 Telecom Data: Deployment of advanced infrastructure and availability of cable data to small businesses will drive revenues New York City Quarterly Data Sub-Sector Revenue Growth Post-9/11 Observations While growth is decelerating, quarterly levels are still very high (annualized over 30% for 2002) Businesses expected to invest in redundant wireless infrastrucutres, or wireless technologoes for disaster recovery Growth may be supported by need to build redundant “national security communications grid” Potential long-term limits on capital market access prevents alternative carriers from making inroads into this subsector Quarterly Data Revenue Growth (%) 15% This is still large growth -- but is primarily shifted to incumbents 10% 5% 10% 5% 0% 0% 2001E 2000 -5% Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Pre 9/11 Source: IDC’, Economy.com, BAH Analysis 2002E Q3 Base Q1 2003E Q3 Pessimistic Optimistic 73 Appendix C. Detailed Actions 74 1.) HIGH-PRIORITY ACTION – Reimburse/finance efforts of key players to rebuild while upgrading Action Reimburse/finance the efforts of key players to rebuild or repair damaged/destroyed infrastructure, getting NYC services “back to normal” while upgrading current infrastructure Implementation Actions Key Costs Key Benefits Feasibility Develop guidelines for new infrastructure standards allowing service providers and corporations to “leapfrog” technology cycles • New wireless standards • Next generation wireline Define scope of reimbursements -- e.g., minimum thresholds for reimbursement, damage types within scope Determine key sector companies and estimate expenses suffered due to extensive infrastructure damage from 9/11 through research study or company-initiated application for assistance Work with settlement and insurance companies to communicate process for distribution of reimbursement funds Administer and monitor approved use of reimbursement funds Total estimates exceed $2B for service providers, $10B for corporations Variable reimbursement costs depending on scope of repair/replacement effort; general administrative costs for reimbursement program, including coordination of repair/replacement resources ~1 mgmt-level FTEs (plus small staff of 2-3 FTEs) to scope, develop and administer the program over 12-24 months Overall Cost Estimate: $10-12B Source of funds: Public sector and insurance companies Provides short-term financial support to sector companies experiencing significant infrastructure damage Restores IT/Telecom services and infrastructure while instituting higher levels of customer service High Government (both state and federal) bailout/disaster relief funds are likely to cover reimbursement needs, in conjunction with any applicable insurance payments 75 2.) Help companies with capacity find customers with needs – support customer access to key providers/subcontractors Action Help companies with capacity find customers with needs -- support customer access to key providers/subcontractors for short-term requirements Implementation Actions Key Costs Key Benefits Feasibility Establish resource for providers of IT and telecom services to more easily reach customers requiring such services; e.g.: • Online facility • Temporary referral agency (non-technology option) • Combination Determine eligibility guidelines for providers (quality level guarantees) Communicate availability of program to providers and potential customers throughout NYC If possible, leverage existing contact engine, similar to hotjobs.com, to facilitate rapid deployment Variable -- for technology option, could be up to $2MM for new technology platform, less if partnering with established player Non-technology option requires small office staff (3-5 FTEs) ~1 management-level FTEs to develop and administer program Minimal ongoing costs as all transactions are negotiated between parties Overall Cost Estimate: $15-17MM Source of funds: Private Consortium or Public sector Enables small IT service providers to better compete with larger players for short-term increase in demand in certain areas Reduces costs for small to medium business to find quality IT service providers that are available to help them May develop into long-term facility to foster business development going forward Moderate (technology option) to High Total cost appears to be small, primarily basic administration expenses Business organizations such as NYC Partnership could facilitate/host services relatively easily 76 3.) Upgrade capacity/capabilities of the communications infrastructure Action Upgrade capacity and capability of communications infrastructure (e.g., 3G, 802.11, voice-over-cable, VOIP, upgraded wireline capacity, Bell Atlantic Net) Implementation Actions Key Costs Key Benefits Feasibility Coordinate with industry leaders/experts to identify critical next generation initiatives/upgrade opportunities ready to deploy and valuable to business community -- from both redundancy as well as improved services perspectives Identify players with deployment capabilities for next generation technology infrastructure in Lower Manhattan -- allow self nomination or conduct independent research study Develop action plans, milestones for deployment of various technologies -- consider any lower Manhattan-specific implementation obstacles Determine overall deployment costs for various infrastructure elements Will be costly, as upgrade efforts were previously avoided due to lack of economic viability Additional coordination costs to work with numerous companies Minimal logistic and other operating costs Overall Cost Estimate: $2-3MM Source of funds: Private consortium, Public sector, and/or Individual companies Performance of existing NYC businesses is likely to improve due to operational advantages provided by advanced infrastructure New businesses (both high-tech and other) will be more likely to locate in New York for similar reasons Highly-skilled labor resources will find relocation within NYC to be relatively more attractive as well Low Cost to deploy new infrastructure/replace existing infrastructure is high In some cases deployment may cause delays in reconnection of services and/or disruptions in basic service already in place 77 4.) Improve customer service, satisfaction, and customer options for communications services Action Improve customer service, satisfaction, and customer options for communications services (billing options, call center performance, etc.) Implementation Actions Key Costs Key Benefits Feasibility Identify new key industry benchmarks and best practices for customer service and satisfaction -- customer service performance during recent crises has increased service levels and reduced cycle time expectations Establish minimum standards to satisfy new requirements based on customer feedback, industry performance Increase funds and/or reengineer operations to accommodate new customer service and satisfaction requirements (e.g., implementing new systems and resources to accommodate new billing options) On an ongoing basis, monitor key performance metrics and improve processes ~4 FTE over 2 months to research best practices and understand key performance thresholds Additional labor, equipment/system costs associated with improving customer service (dependent on service levels required); e.g.: • Increased staff • Upgraded systems • Enhanced services Overall Cost Estimate: $0.5MM Source of funds: Private consortium or individual companies (e.g., Verizon, AT&T) Companies throughout NYC (and potentially the tri-state area) gain better voice and data service to conduct business, increasing their overall economic benefit to the city New York City business infrastructure is improved Communications -- Infrastructure limitations removed as barrier to locating business in New York City Low/Medium Service providers must commit to providing better service Customers must be willing to pay for increased costs Creative solutions for cost sharing may be available 78 5a / 5b.) HIGH PRIORITY ACTION – Establish business and service-provider consortia to address infrastructure requirements Action Establish business and service-provider (demand and supply) consortia to address infrastructure requirements Implementation Actions Key Costs Key Benefits Feasibility Solicit participants, from key businesses, service providers, and equipment manufacturers (e.g., Large Financial Services companies, Verizon, AT&T, Lucent, AOL) to ensure buy-iin from all key consituents Business and service provider consortia should operate jointly and independently to determine constituents specific needs Suggested agenda items: • Disaster recover and survivability planning • Capacity requirements and constraints • New technology requirements and implementation methods Suggested action-item categories: • Methods for funding potentially non-economically beneficial activities (e.g., redundancy creation) by individual members • Required / Suggested policy changes • Specific responsibilities for implementation by member companies (e.g., client corporations required to upgrade so service provider investments in new technologies will have a market) Establishment of consortia and coordination costs should incur minimal costs ~1 management-level FTE to help coordinate key players Overall Cost Estimate: $4-6MM Source of funds: Private consortia/key individual company members Enables greater infrastructure redundancy and advanced capabilities without placing undue burden on supply-side sector companies to invest capital with no expectation of reasonable return Potentially, provides valuable precedent for greater cooperation between supply-side sector companies and demand-side industries for future issues Provide forum to develop future disaster recovery plans High Cost to establish consortia is minimal, and cost to deploy redundancy should be matched as best as possible with potential for increased revenue/earnings to supply-side companies Allows greater redundancy to be built without public-sector intervention 79 6.) HIGH-PRIORITY ACTION – Establish new business development region with advanced technology infrastructure Action Establish new business development region (or regions) within New York City, with advanced technology infrastructure (e.g., 802.11B system) -- focus on supporting small businesses Implementation Actions Key Costs Key Benefits Feasibility Identify candidate regions for establishment of business development area, based on value to city, existing infrastructure, business demand Identify key sector companies to understand key technologies available/feasible for deployment; work with them to prioritize Develop staged implementation plan for selected areas and technologies Incorporate needs of small business (technology and non-technology) in development zone 2 FTEs for 3 months to research and evaluate potential areas , as well as work with sector companies to understand candidate technologies and advantages provided by each Variable deployment costs depending on number of areas to be established and scale; should be less than ~$50M for establishment of single small zone Overall Cost Estimate: $30-50MM Source of funds: Private sector in partnership with public sector funding Allows small companies to leverage leading technologies in operations and/or service offerings Provides key selling point for NYC to potential small business community members, vs. other regions Encourages development/testing of innovative technologies on limited basis within NYC Moderate Scope must be managed to keep costs reasonable Determination of appropriate locations for establishment of new zones may ultimately be more political than economical 80 7.) Provide mechanisms to help small technology sector companies take advantage of rebuilding spend Action Provide mechanisms to help small technology sector companies take advantage of rebuilding spend; allow smaller firms to compete more effectively with larger established corporations Implementation Actions Key Costs Key Benefits Feasibility Establish “NYC hometown provider” (or similar) network of rebuilding service providers to enable small providers to demonstrate quality Provide screening based on financial health, customer satisfaction, etc. to ensure quality of service providers Provide customer companies with financial incentives for the use of “hometown providers”; e.g., • tax benefits • discounted rates • service bundling opportunities Publicize availability and legitimacy of program to customers, integrate cross-marketing into member companies’ sales efforts where possible ~1 mgmt-level FTE to set up and administer program, coordinate activities between members, certify and review membership applicants Small (~$0.5M) budget to launch program with small administrative staff Overall Cost Estimate: $.5-.75 MM Source of funds: Public sector and/or industry consortium (perhaps through membership fees or shared profit pool) Preserves viability of small companies that may lack brand recognition and/or marketing muscle of larger players Ensures competitive market for services, reducing time and cost for customers requiring extraordinary services to execute rebuilding process Moderate Costs appear to be relatively low Determining appropriate certification criteria, as well as coordinating members effectively, may prove to be difficult political obstacle 81 8.) Enable small companies to refocus and/or diversify to accommodate shifts in company priorities Action Enable small companies to refocus and/or diversify for short- to medium-term, as a result of new shifts in company priorities (e.g., shift toward increased security spending) Implementation Actions Key Costs Key Benefits Feasibility Identify specific companies adversely affected by shifts in corporate priorities resulting from 9/11 -- allow companies to submit applications, or execute independent research study to determine this Analyze/understand company (or company groups if appropriate) situations to develop possible refocusing/diversification opportunities on case-by-case basis Determine extent/type of funding and assistance available vs. required (e.g., professional services, direct funding, networking assistance) Communicate assistance program options to relevant companies, help to coordinate delivery Total refocusing costs variable depending on level of assistance required by identified companies and extent to which leveraging of economies of scale is possible ~2 management-level FTEs over 12-24 months to develop and administer program General administrative costs for program (small office of 3-5 FTEs), including external resource coordination Overall Cost Estimate: $400K - $500K Source of funds: Private Consortium Provides key temporary/transitional resources to small and medium sized companies, allowing them to survive and potentially expand into higher-growth areas Provides clients of new high-priority services with more service options and greater provider competition Enables companies within the region to better exploit new market opportunities long-term through increased networking and diversification of skill set Low Direct benefit to city is unclear Ability to raise significant funds is questionable Cost and complexity appear to be unreasonably high However, certain professional and/or business associations may find this attractive 82 9.) Support competition in communication services through education of businesses on available service alternatives Action Support competition in communication services by educating businesses on available service alternatives Implementation Actions Key Costs Key Benefits Feasibility Identify key services for which small businesses typically have difficulty understanding benefits and/or locating suitable providers (e.g., advanced/alternative voice services, high-value IT deployment and maintenance services) Coordinate with industry leaders to develop/understand key benefits of various technologies to typical small-business owners -- leverage existing marketing efforts Develop resources (company-sponsored or otherwise) to communicate all available options and key benefits -- may be print materials, online, broadcast advertising campaign, etc. Identify key undeserved geographic areas within NYC for relevant technologies Establish guidelines for private investment and public-sector subsidies to expand/accelerate infrastructure deployment ~1 mgmt-level FTE over 6 months to determine key areas, design and administer program, in addition to small staff for materials creation (2-3 FTEs) Basic administration costs Costs to create educational campaign; these can include: • Printing and distribution costs • Technology support and maintenance costs • Media campaign creative and production costs Overall Cost Estimate: $100-110MM Source of funds: Public sector or private consortium Existing small ventures in NYC are provided with key information to enable their survival and success New technology ventures may be attracted to NYC area due to marketing/education infrastructure in place to communicate new technology benefits to potential customers Low Challenge/political conflicts in identifying key technologies to espouse, and evaluating their true benefits vs. costs, is significant Costs, however, should be minimal compared to other initiatives 83 10.) HIGH-PRIORITY ACTION – Channel investments to technologies critical to native NYC industries Action Channel investments to the technologies critical to native NYC industries, establishing an industrywide commitment to forward-looking areas that will advance these industries Implementation Actions Key Costs Key Benefits Feasibility Assemble industry consortium to identify key key support technology support areas in which to channel investments Selectively invest -- on individual company basis, aggressively utilize available funds to pursue these areas (shift away from low-growth but potentially higher-revenue areas) Supplement these actions with support from the public sector; e.g.: • Provide tax incentives for investment in emerging high-growth areas • Utilize existing public sector vehicles to provide growth capital (e.g., SBA-type loan guarantees, etc.) Lower investment in low-growth but proven areas may decrease ongoing cash position and flexibility No direct incremental costs Source of funds: Individual companies, Public sector (if provides incentives) Provides continued funding to critical support technology areas, to ensure NYC industries are not “left behind” by more technologically advanced players elsewhere Helps to retain skilled high-tech talent pool within NYC area Moderate Key high-growth areas may vary significantly from company to company; investments may be so different as to not provide tangible benefits Costs should be relatively small, as includes primarily incremental additions to investments that would have been made otherwise 84 11.) Establish NYC as the center of Finance and Media technology R&D by fostering a climate for new technology venturing Action Establish NYC as center of Finance and Media technology R&D (e.g., foster a climate for new technology venturing, facilitate R&D investment and development of local talent, provide incentives to companies/entities conduction NYC centric technology R&D activities) Implementation Actions Key Costs Key Benefits Feasibility Establish R&D coordination office • To attract and foster R&D activities throughout NYC • To ensure communication/cooperation between academic, public-sector, and commercial players for given R&D efforts Provide public sector-supported financial incentives (tax, loans, etc.) for R&D spending by companies, with clear incentives to participate in NYC-wide programs Develop and implement program to ensure access to home-grown capital through private-sector financial institutions Identify technology priorities which have significant relevance to NYC industries and develop a set of venturing initiatives Establish ongoing relationships and program to coordinate development with research talent pool/resources in local area (e.g., research universities) 2 FTEs over 12 months to determine key improvements areas, design and administer program; 1 FTE ongoing Ongoing administration and coordination efforts will have to be provided through permanent group of public-sector and/or privatesector staff Overall Cost Estimate: $300-400K Source of funds: Private companies and/or public-sector Positions NYC as technological focal point, bringing in individuals and companies with innovative ideas/solutions Provides NYC with a continuously improving technology infrastructure, attracting new businesses and helping retain existing businesses Enables small businesses to more easily obtain/leverage services that might otherwise only be available to large businesses with greater resources to spend on infrastructure Retains entrepreneurial talent pool Provides existing NYC small ventures an advantage over other regions Low Costs may be prohibitive (especially wrt physical R&D centers) without significant public-sector participation Important to achieve “critical mass” in R&D participants (especially local research talent pool) to make this successful and selfperpetuating; otherwise, will drain funds for little benefit 85