The Hybrid Librarian in the Student Learning Center Caroline Cason University of Georgia Libraries UGA Libraries Comprised of the Main library, Science library, Student Learning Center and Research Facilities 3.7 million items in the collection Access to over 300 electronic databases and indexes through GALILEO Access to over 30 thousand full text journals and newspapers Student Learning Center “One Stop Shop” with classrooms, library research sources and technology Partnership effort between OISD, EITS and University Libraries Extremely successful and welcomed on campus by students and faculty, alike High traffic: 15,395 entries into the building on April 28, 2004 Reference Desk at the SLC Electronic Library consists of all electronic research sources with a small, noncirculating print collection Four reference/info desks 3 Desks staffed by student consultants and 1 desk staffed by both a librarian and student consultants Student Consultants managed by EITS. Administratively separate from the Libraries. The Electronic Library Combined computer lab and library space -- a trend in “Information Commons” but at the SLC we are in an almost exclusively electronic library environment Staffing ensures professional library research assistance is available but do the students know we are there? Survey Says … Spring 2004 online and paper survey of nearly 1000 users of the SLC 2 focus groups conducted with undergrad and graduate students Asked what they use in the SLC Visits by Status 973 Visits 28% Freshmen Sophomores 20% Juniors 24% Seniors Grad Students Faculty Members 20% 1% 0% 0% 7% Staff Members Visitors Survey Results selected statistics Students Researching & Writing Papers in the SLC 80% GIL 60% GALILEO 40% Web 20% 0% WebCT 18% 22.50% 72% 67% Technology Use by Students Studying in a Group or Individually Note: Will not total 100% as respondents could choose multiple sources 40% Softw are 20% Graphics/Scanner 0% Wireless 31% 7.50% 10% Focus Group Results Focus groups – consisted of 2 groups of 7-8 grads and undergrads Know there are librarians in the SLC but not where Understood that electronic resources were available but still visited the Main and Science libraries for print Use the SLC as a study space and to work on group projects One student referred to librarians as “research technicians” Thought of librarians as being helpful and “would prefer to ask a librarian” for assistance to save time Said the SLC become an essential part of their academic lives: “I realized after it opened that it was absolutely necessary.” Library Resource Use GALILEO Slight increase in SLC from Fall 2003 to Spring 2004 Still very low compared to Main and Science Libraries Statistics count number of times someone accessed GALILEO from the SLC versus Main/Science Libraries GALILEO Use 50000 47299 40233 40000 30000 20000 SLC 13873 15106 10000 0 Fall 2003 Spring 2004 Main/Sci Library Resource Use GIL -- The stats count GIL “requests” from users in the UGA Libraries. Requests include: each search, each click to look at a record, each request to view a patron record, etc. TOTAL REQUESTS Fall 2003 SLC 85,044 Main & Science 1,194,447 Spring 2004 SLC 91,207 Main & Science 1,020,682 GIL Use Fall 2003 400000 300000 SLC 200000 Main / Science 100000 0 Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec GIL Use Spring 2004 400000 300000 SLC 200000 Main / Science 100000 0 Jan Feb March April May At the Desk – Fall 2003 SLC: 12,720 total questions 5% In-depth or Ready Reference 35% Directional 60% Software, Graphics Machines, Printer or Machine Maintenance, Wireless Note that we had some significant technical problems this semester leading to lots of questions about the printers Science: 10,073 total questions 62% In-depth or Ready Reference 17% Directional 21% Software help, Printer or Machine Maintenance At the Desk – Spring 2004 SLC: 9,561 total questions 6% In-depth or Ready Reference 53% Directional 41% Software, Graphics Machines, Printer, Machine Maintenance, Wireless Science: 8,331 total questions 68% In-depth or Ready Reference 13% Directional 19% Software help, Printer or Machine Maintenance The Librarians’ Experience Positive outcomes “I feel more connected to what is going on around campus” Emphasis on library as process rather than library as place Librarians are fulfilling the “one stop shop” by answering both reference and tech questions Love the interaction with student staff The Librarians’ Experience Challenges Defining roles when responsibilities overlap Creating new policies on the fly Maintaining skill level (tech and reference) Frustration with lack of reference questions Communicating the concept of a library without books How Has Reference Changed? New skills Broadening our technology skills Working collaboratively Closer to faculty Opportunities to teach in a technologically advanced environment Loss of “traditional” skills? Very little print Lack of demand for reference work New Techniques “Retail Style” Reference Chat Reference In-depth Reference Collaboration with teaching faculty in the SLC Encourage addition of research assignments Participate with OISD in Faculty Orientations and Forums Tours/Orientations/Indoctrinations! Becoming more involved in the first year experience to relay the message that the SLC is a library from the start New Tactics Combat loss of skills by maintaining reference shifts at the Main and Science Libraries Build identity of SLC Reference desk by being both places Continue public relations efforts Explore ways to emphasize the traditional library within this new environment More prominent signage New Reading Room collection Increased teaching load/reference conferences The Teaching Mission Librarians from the SLC have increased their teaching load over the past year Number of Participants July 2003 - May 2004 Number of BIs / Tours July 2003 - May 2004 211 229 2029 SLC SLC Main Main Science 137 4565 2447 Science Teaching in the SLC Classes are usually taught in our Advanced Learning Labs One academic credit class taught twice weekly in the SLC Can make “house calls” to any class taught in the SLC The Future? Popularity of the SLC indicates that students like the one-stop-shop concept Communication is key with crossdepartmental collaborations Hybrid librarians must keep up with demand for technical expertise while promoting research skills Don’t let “seamless” mean “invisible” Acknowledgements Thanks to the following for their assistance with gathering the statistics used in this presentation: Brad Baxter, Phil Fitzpatrick, Marty Tanner Hughes, Thomas Knowlton and Anna Van Scoyoc Presented by Caroline Cason, Reference & Instruction Librarian, University of Georgia Libraries, ccason@uga.edu