Nothing to disclose 2011 AUR Annual Meeting A3CR2 April 15, 2011 Boston, MA “To serve patients, the public, and the medical profession. . .” “. . .by certifying that its diplomates have acquired, demonstrated, and maintained a requisite standard of knowledge, skill, and understanding. . .” Improve the quality & safety of U.S. healthcare by Demonstrating to the public that physicians certified by the ABR maintain the necessary competencies to provide safe, high-quality patient care. Medical knowledge Patient care and procedural skills Interpersonal and communication skills Professionalism Practice-based learning and improvement Systems-based practice Acquire competencies in residency training Demonstrate competencies (and achieve Milestones) in training Pass the certifying examination Continue development of competencies, proficiencies, and expertise throughout career Demonstrate your continuous professional development through MOC’s Four Components I: Professional standing II: Lifelong learning and self-assessment III: Cognitive expertise IV: Evaluation and improvement of performance in practice* *ABR’s Practice Quality Improvement—PQI Current, full and unrestricted license >1 jurisdiction in U.S., territories, Canada Includes all states of current practice 250 Category I CME credits /10-yr cycle 20 SAMs /10-yr cycle – 4 non-interpretive skills SAMs – 16 clinical content SAMs If 1 subspecialty certificate>6 SAMs in subspec. If 2 subspecialty certificates>6 SAMs, each subspec. 1 examination /10-yr cycle 20%: non-interpretive skills (ABR-directed) 80%: clinical content (practice-profiled) – Composition affected by subspecialty certificates – “Levels” (fundamental, advanced) depend on profile Study guides on web; aim: content outlines >3 PQI projects /10-yr cycle Must attest to activity (on PDB) each year Self-designed projects Group projects prioritized by institution Sponsored (pre-qualified by ABR) projects, including registries 1 FTE model helps those with subspecialty certification 250 CME credits/10 yrs, not 500 20 SAMs/10 yrs, not 40 1 modular exam to maintain 2 certificates PQI requirement of 1 diplomate, not 2 Quality Aim Problem to Address People get the care they need Underuse People need the care they get Overuse Provided safely Error, harm Timely Delays Patient-centered Unresponsive Delivered efficiently Improvement Waste Delivered equitably Opportunities Disparities IOM, Crossing the Quality Chasm (2001) 1) 2) Select project Select appropriate measure, performance target Baseline unbiased measurement (eg. 30-50 consecutive patients) Collect, analyze results (did/did not meet target) Create improvement plan, implement Re-measure Analyze (did/did not meet target), etc. Narrative self-reflection ( 1 paragraph) Plan Do Reflect Act 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) Study Active collaboration in project design and/or implementation (>3 meetings) Collection, submission, and review of project data in keeping with project’s measurement plan Implementation of interventions to improve care, as guided by project Completion of minimum duration of participation established by project leader David L. Nahrwold, M.D. ABMS Executive Committee Retreat January 1998 “The ABMS and its member boards have the obligation to assure the public that their doctors are competent…” “...this should be done through the certification and recertification process.” 1998: Committee on Competence 1999: ABMS adopts 6 competencies 2000: 4 MOC components adopted All 24 Boards commit to MOC 2006: MOC programs of all Boards approved 2007: ABR MOC: All parts (I-IV) operating Kevin Weiss: ABMS Pres. & CEO 2008- ABMS MOC Standards Present: Emphasis on alignment, MOC value Tucson origin: limited carriers, flights Carrier: Does AA fly there? Flight choice #1 vs. #2: meeting schedule, $$$ Schedules + nonstops / connections Return options, compounded travel Frequent flyer miles: balance nearing ticket threshold Equipment: not really Pilot qualifications Airline Transport Pilot License (ATPL) (FAA-qualified to fly commercial jetliners): Highest = Have embraced: Have relinquished: Standards Individuality of approach Team/crew training, responsibility Autonomy Checklists Dependence on memory, experience Mandatory training, simulation Experience as it comes: “hit-or-miss” Federal oversight Self-regulation Primacy of passenger safety All other possible considerations Board Certified and Participating in MOC = ? 1) Unsafe 2) Fragmented, uncoordinated 3) Redundant 4) Wasteful 5) Inaccessible, maldistributed 6) Expensive Performance Measurement Public Reporting Payment Reform Research and Knowledge Dissemination Education and Certification (Professional Development) Delivery system change Insurers Quality organizations Accreditation and Certification National consumer groups Business coalitions Unions Private Sector Non-profit Organizations Government Healthcare professionals/providers To earn the public’s trust and maintain a portion of our professional privilege to self-regulate, we will have to… …deliver quality, affordable care …engage in physician performance assessment and improvement …demonstrate outcomes through public reporting To accomplish this, the Boards must move from… to… …measuring what candidates/diplomates know …measuring what they know and do. “…a culture of pedigree” “…a culture of improvement”1 1Norman Kahn, CMSS, NQF-ABMS meeting, April 29, 2009 Board Certification=Gold Standard August 2003 Gallup Poll: When asked: “When given the choice between a board certified physician and a physician who was not board certified but was recommended by a trusted friend or family member…” 75% opted for a board certified physician 23% opted for the physician recommended by a friend or family member Board Certification=Gold Standard May 2008 Opinion Research Corp. Telephone Poll When asked: “Key factors when choosing a doctor…” 95% bedside manner; communication skills 91% board certification 82% friend or family member recommendation 78% doctor’s hospital affiliation 75% doctor’s office location 60% hospital or school where doctor trained Public values maintenance of board certification 2010 ABMS Public Opinion Poll 95%: important for docs to maintain board certification 45%: would look for a new doctor 41% : would stop referring family or friends Many studies link Board Certification to higher quality care –IM, cardiology, vascular surgery, orthopedics –Lower mortality, shorter LOS (AMI, acute CHF): Health Affairs, August 2010 MOC- Early info from MOC exams: –High scores correlate with prior residency program director ratings –Can identify patient care deficiencies, enable feedback, targeted Part II & IV activities –ABR working on evidence base http://www.theabr.org/forms/ABR%20 annual%20report%202009-10.pdf Directly accessible from home page, www.theabr.org Professional (only) self-regulation in medicine is past Shared professional regulation is here. Expectation: continuous professional development (CPD). MOC is your framework for CPD. Healthcare reform: transparency and accountability ABMS, Boards including ABR are working to be… – Responsive – Proactive – Innovative …to strengthen the role of board certification in demonstrating your continuing competence