Presentation with Formal Project Issues - CALT

advertisement
L2C
Learning to Collaborate
A Description
Table of Contents
Project Summary
Project Objectives
Outputs & Deliverables
Financial Plan
Budget & Resource Distribution
Project Work-plan
Consortium Structure
Project Summary



Total Expected Funding:
3.024.213,75 €
Duration: 24 Months
Key Action Addressed: e-Learning
Project Objectives
 provide a clear understanding of the factors inhibiting effective
collaboration dynamics and leading to the failure of
collaboration initiatives (“Collaboration Traps & Challenges”),
and of the interventions required to reduce these risks
(“Collaboration Management Competencies”).
 develop an innovative framework (Advanced Collaboration
Dynamics and Technologies - ACDT Framework) addressing
the effective development of collaboration competencies.
 develop a set of widely deployable, advanced, interactive and
experiential technology-enhanced solutions (“ACDT Simulation
Games”) guaranteeing the effective understanding and
internalization of:
 (1) cognitive, motivational and attitudinal factors,
 (2) complexity of knowledge integration processes and distributed,
ICT-supported teamwork, and
 (3) management competencies determining the success or failure
of collaboration dynamics in diverse and distributed contexts.
Outputs & Deliverables
In terms of specific outputs, the project will produce:
•
A comprehensive online Knowledge Base and active Virtual
Learning Community on Advanced Collaboration Dynamics &
Technologies (ACDT)
•
ACDT Framework: An e-Learning Framework to address the
effective development of Collaboration Competencies in the
Information Society
•
ACDT Simulation Games Prototypes: Validated computerenhanced learning Solutions deployable in educational and
organizational contexts
Outputs & Deliverables : Graphic Overview of Project
Outputs
Motivational
and Cultural
Dynamics
Knowledge
Integration
Dynamics
Distributed
Workteams
Dynamics
Collaboration
Effective
Emerging
Competencies ACDT Learning Sim.& Agents
Best Practices
Solutions
Technologies
Individual
Level
Groups
Level
Organizational
Level
Inter-Organ’l
Level
versioning
ACDT =
Advanced Collaboration
Dynamics & Technologies
Online Knowledge
Base
(collaboration dynamics
– research, practice and
learning solutions)
ACDT Virtual Learning
Community
(Output)
ACDT Framework
&
ACDT Simulation
Games Prototypes
Collaborative
R&D cycle
ACDT DynKB
(Output)
integration,
design
&
development
closure
ACDT Framework
(Output)
refinements
Pilots 1
(within target users groups
from Acad & Industr. Partners)
Pilots 2
(with broader users target
groups – SMEs, Univ., Gov.)
ACDT Simulation
Games Version 1.0
(Output)
Dissemination
(Output)
Outputs & Deliverables: Deliverables List (1)
Del.
no.
Deliverable name
WP
no.
Leader
personmonths
Nature
Dissem.
level
Delivery
date (M)
D7.1
Quality Assurance Plan
WP7
INSEAD
10.8
R
PU
2
D1.1
ACDT Knowledge Harvesting and
Integration Report
WP1
UAFM
55,5
R
PU
6
D5.1
Dissemination and Exploitation
Plan
WP5
ALPHA
7
R
RE
6
D2.1
ACDT Knowledge Mgt Tools
WP2
FVA
25.5 +
27
R+P
RE
8
D6.1
Evaluation Plan
WP6
UCSC
10
R
PU
8
D6.2
Technical and Pedagogical
Evaluation Criteria and Metrics
WP6
UCSC
9
R
PU
8
D3.1
ACDT Framework, Simulation
Scenario and Design
WP3
OFAI
24 + 21
R
PP
12
D3.2
ACDT Simulation Games
Prototype
WP3
OFAI
23.5
P
RE
12
D6.3
Evaluation Report of the First
Prototype
WP6
UCSC
7
R
PU
12
D4.1A
Pilots Report - Round 1
WP4
INSEAD
14
R
PU
18
D4.2A
ACDT KM Tools Versioning
Report - Round 1
WP4
INSEAD
14
R+ P
PU
18
Outputs & Deliverables: Deliverables List (2)
Del.
no.
Deliverable name
WP
no.
Leader
personmonths
Nature
Dissem.
level
Deliv
ery
date
(M)
D4.3A
ACDT Simulation Games Prototype and
Framework Versioning Report - Round 1
WP4
INSEAD
11
R+ P
PU
18
D6.4
Evaluation Report of the Final Prototype
WP6
UCSC
7
R
PU
18
D4.1B
Pilots Report - Round 2
WP4
INSEAD
13
R
PU
22
D4.2B
ACDT Knowledge Management Tools
Versioning Report - Round 2
WP4
INSEAD
12
R+ P
PU
22
D4.3B
ACDT Simulation Games Prototype and
Framework Versioning Report - Round 2
WP4
INSEAD
12
R+ P
PU
22
D5.2
Dissemination Actions Report
WP5
ALPHA
37
R
PU
22
D5.3
Final Packaging and Distribution Strategy
Report
WP5
ALPHA
22
R
PU
22
D6.5
Evaluation Report of Simulation Games
prototypes
WP6
UCSC
7
R
PU
22
D6.6
Project’s Assessment / Comparative
Analysis (Final Report)
WP6
UCSC
6.5
R
PU
24
TOTAL
375.25
Financial Plan





Total project budget: 3.024.213,75 €.
Project coordination managing costs: 134.307,75 €.
The management cost is within the 7% limit of EC
contribution.
Travel budget: less than 6% of total budget allocated.
Distribution of resources:
L2C represents a total effort of 375.25 Person-Months,
with a total budget of 3.024.213,75 € corresponding to a
funding request of 1.999.921,30 €.
Budget & Resource Distribution
Type of Activities
% Total Budget
% EC Contribution
93
91
Demonstration Activities
3
2
Consortium management
activities
4
7
100
100
Research/innovation activities
TOTAL
Research & Innovation
PARTNERS
INS
EAD
UCS
C
UAF
M
OFA
I
OU
SCIL
IF
ALBA
UC
Méti
s
FVA
Alpha
SU
Total
Research & Innovation
WP1: Knowledge
Harvesting and
Integration
10
5
8
5,5
5
2,5
1
4,5
1
2,5
2
3,5
5
55,5
WP2:
Knowledge
Management
Tools
Development
6
4
4
2
2
2
2
3
2
6
11,5
5
3
52,5
WP3:
Framework
Simulation
Prototypes
Development
16
3
4,5
11
2
4
2
3
2
4
8,5
7,5
1
68,5
19,
0
3,5
2,0
3,0
0,0
2,5
4,5
5,0
4,5
11,
0
5,0
4,5
0,0
64,5
WP5: Exploitation and
Dissemination
12,
0
4,0
2,0
2,0
2,5
2,0
3,0
6,0
3,0
15,
0
7,5
5,0
1,5
65,5
WP6:
Embedded,
Contin. Evaluation
6,0
7,5
4,0
3,5
3,0
4,0
2,5
4,0
2,5
4,5
1,0
0,0
4,0
46,5
Total research
/innovation
69
27
24,5
27
14,5
17
15
25,5
15
43
35,5
25,5
14,5
353
ACDT
&
Games
WP4:
Pilots
Prototyping Cycles
&
Demonstration &Management
PARTNERS
INSE
AD
UCS
C
UAF
M
OFA
I
OU
SCI
L
IF
ALBA
UC
MeTi
s
FVA
Alph
a
SU
TOTAL
PARTNE
RS
Demonstration activities
WP4: Pilots and
Prototyping
Cycles
3,0
1,0
0,5
0,5
0,5
0,5
0,5
1,0
1,0
1,0
0,5
1,0
0,5
11,5
Total
demonstration
3,0
1,0
0,5
0,5
0,5
0,5
0,5
1,0
1,0
1,0
0,5
1,0
0,5
11,5
Management activities
WP7:
Project
Management
4,0
0,5
0,5
0,5
0,5
0,5
0,5
0,8
0,5
1,0
0,5
0,5
0,5
10,8
Total consortium
management
4,0
0,5
0,5
0,5
0,5
0,5
0,5
0,8
0,5
1,0
0,5
0,5
0,5
10,8
TOTAL
ACTIVITIES
76,0
28,5
25,5
28
15,
5
18,0
27,3
16,5
45,0
36,5
27,0
16
15,5
375,25
Total Budget (1)
Rate
Direct
mm
Cost
MMS
Person
nel
Costs
Overhe
ad
Cons
uma
bles
Travel
Other
specific
cost /
Audit
EQUIP.
SUB
CONT
ARCTI
NG
Total costs
ECContribution
INSE
AD
40%
6500
76,0
494000
197600
1000
17000
3500
10000
23000
746.100,00
389.405,00
UCSC
20%
5000
28,5
142500
31600
1000
13000
2500
0
0
190.600,00
190.600,00
UAFM
20%
5000
25,5
127500
28600
1000
13000
2500
0
0
172.600,00
172.600,00
OFAI
20%
5000
28,0
140000
31100
1000
13000
2500
0
0
187.600,00
187.600,00
OU
20%
5000
15,5
77500
18600
1000
13000
2500
0
0
112.600,00
112.600,00
5000
18,0
90000
21100
1000
13000
2500
0
0
127.600,00
127.600,00
10000
16,0
160000
64000
1000
13000
2500
0
0
240.500,00
124.450,00
SCIL
20%
IF
40%
Total Budget (2)
Rate
ALBA
20%
UC
40%
MeTis
45%
FVA
20%
Alpha
Labs
50%
SU
20%
TOTAL
Direc
t mm
Cost
MMS
Personnel
Costs
Overhead
Consu
mabl.
Travel
Other
specific
cost /
Audit
EQUI
P.
SUBC
ONTA
RCTIN
G
Total costs
ECContribution
5000
27,3
136250
33550
1000
16000
2500
5000
7000
201.300
104.100,00
5000
16,5
82500
33000
1000
13000
2500
0
0
132.000
68.450,00
4300
45,0
193500
87075
1000
15000
2794,75
4000
9000
312.369,75
160.264,50
5380
36,5
196370
39274
1000
13000
2500
6000
6000
264.144,00
134.951,80
5000
27,0
135000
67500
1000
13000
2500
5000
0
224.000,00
114.500,00
5000
15,5
77500
18800
1000
13000
2500
0
0
112.800,00
112.800,00
13.00
0
178.00
0
33.794,
75
30.00
0
45.00
0
375,25
2.052.620
671.79
9
3.024.213,
75
1.999.921,3
Project Work-plan
Consortium Composition/Roles
1.
INSEAD-Centre for Advanced Learning Technologies - CALT
2.
Università Cattolica, Milano
University of Armed Forces, Munich
Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence (OFAI) Wien
OPEN University
St Gallen University – Swiss Center for Innovations in Learning (SCIL)
FIAT –Isvor
Athens Laboratory of Business Administration (ALBA)
UniCredit
MeTis
FVA
Alpha Labs
Strathclyde University
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Participant
No
Code
Country
Role
INSEAD
Centre for Advanced Learning
Technologies (CALT)
1
INSEA
D
F
Co-ord
Learning Technology, Simulations Design, Collaboration
Dynamics expertise, and Executive Education expertise
2
UCSC
I
Partner
Collaboration Dynamics expertise – focus on technological
and psychological aspects, and evaluation expertise
3
UAFM
D
Partner
Collaboration Dynamics expertise – focus on knowledge
management and integration aspects, and students
learning expertise
4
OFAI
A
Partner
Design and development of agent-based systems, human
cognitive and learning processes, and technical
evaluation expertise
5
OU
UK
Partner
Collaboration Dynamics expertise – all dimensions, and
distributed learning expertise
6
SCIL
CH
Partner
Collaboration Dynamics expertise – focus on
psychological, sociological and team dynamics aspects,
and students learning expertise
7
IF
I
Partner
Corporate Training (industrial and public sector) and
Collaboration Practice expertise
8
ALBA
Gr
Partner
SMEs Training expertise
9
UC
I
Partner
Corporate Training (financial services sector) and
Collaboration Practice expertise
10
MeTis
Gr
Partner
Strategic planning and business analysis of corporate
training. Public policy analysis on e-learning.
Innovation management and know-how transfer.
11
FVA
I
Partner
User Interface development and usability evaluation
expertise
12
Alpha
F
Partner
Simulation games Kernels development, virtual
community facilitation and simulation games diffusion
expertise
13
SU
UK
Partner
Universita Cattolica Milano
University of the Armed
Forces Munich
Austrian Research Institute
for Artificial Intelligence
(OFAI) Wien
OPEN University
St Gallen University
Swiss Center for Innovations
in Learning (SCIL)
Isvor FIAT
Athens Laboratory of
Business Administration
(ALBA)
UniCredit
MeTis
FVA
AlphaLabs
Strathclyde University,
Key Contribution
Collaboration Dynamics expertise – all dimensions, and
<Thank You>
Download