Humanities RQF Trial Results &
RQF Groups
September 2007
RQF Trial Results
Proporation of assessed staff with rating (%)
Humanities v Overall (MQ & UNewc combined)
40
35
30
25
TOTAL
HUMN
20
15
10
5
0
1
2
3
4
5
RQF Trial Divisional Results
Ancient
History
Asian
English
European
Modern
History
Music
Pol & IR
TOTAL
Rate 5
5
0
2
0
2
0
1
10
Rate 4
7
1
6
3
3
1
1
22
Rate 3
1
1
2
3
5
1
1
14
Rate 2
2
1
1
3
2
2
1
12
Rate 1
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
3
TOTAL
15
4
11
11
12
4
4
61
Humanities RQF Plan
Ancient History
Group Leaders:
Assoc. Prof. Tom Hillard
Dr Trevor Evans
RFCD:
430110 (Hist: Class)
430203 (Arch: Med, Levant)
440204 (Rel: Chr. Hist)
Modern History
and Politics
Group Leaders:
Prof. Angela Woollacott
Prof. Murray Goot
RFCD :
430100 (Hist : Discipline code)
420303 (CultSt : Culture, Gender,
Sexuality)
360100 (PolSc : Discipline code)
English and European Literatures
Group Leaders:
Prof. John Stephens
Assoc. Prof. Martina Möllering
RFCD:
420200 (Lit Studies: Discipline
code)
420306 (CultSt: Postcolonial and
Global Cultural Studies)
(Ancient History)
(Asian Languages)
(English)
(European Languages)
______________
Not in trial:
5
(Modern History)
(Politics and IR)
(Asian Languages)
(Division)
______________
Not in trial:
4
In trial: 14 (+ up to 5)
Average score: 4.2
5: 5
4: 7
3: 1
In trial: 16 (+ up to 5)
Average score: 3.8
5: 3
4: 7
3: 6
In trial: 16
Average score: 3.8
5: 2
4: 9
3: 5
Contemporary Music Studies  Anthropology/Cultural Practice group
Group Leaders
(Preparation of ‘Evidence Portfolio’ for RQF Submission)
Ancient History Group:
Assoc. Prof. Tom Hillard
Dr. Trevor Evans
Modern History and Politics Group:
Prof. Angela Woollacott
Prof. Murray Goot
English and European Literatures Group:
Prof. John Stephens
Assoc. Prof. Martina Möllering
RQF Submission
‘Home Panels’ (13):
Panel 9: Social Sciences and Politics
Panel 12: Humanities
Panel 13: Creative Arts, Design, and Built Environment
Evidence Portfolio:
1. Group identification
2. Context Statement
3. Details of each researcher
4. Statement of Claims for Impact
5. Metrics (journal rankings)
Evidence Portfolio
1. Group identification:
•
•
•
Name of Group
RFCD codes (up to 3) and SEO codes
Home Panel and any cross-disciplinary Panel
Evidence Portfolio
2. Context Statement:
• Statement of history, strategic focus, and research objectives of the
Group
• Summary of main achievements of the Group
• Extent of Cohesion and Collaboration within the Group
• Collaborative research within the Institution (i.e. University) and/or
elsewhere (Australia and overseas)
• Support for ECRs and HDR students
• Esteem factors
• Comment on difficulties overcome
• Funding income
Evidence Portfolio
3. Details of each researcher:
• Four ‘Best’
• ‘Body of Work’ (all publications)
(i.e. a revised version of information prepared for the RQF Trial,
using feedback from comments)
Evidence Portfolio
4. Statement of Claims for Impact:
• Engagement with end-users (including academic discipline)
• Uptake of research (e.g. public policy)
• Extent to which research has produced social, economic,
environmental, cultural benefits
5. Metrics
• (journal rankings)