PHYS 5326 – Lecture #9 Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu 1. Quantum Electro-dynamics (QED) 2. Local Gauge Invariance 3. Introduction of Massless Vector Gauge Field Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007 PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 1 Announcements • First term exam will be on Wednesday, Mar. 7 • It will cover up to what we finish today • The due for all homework up to last week’s is Monday, Mar. 19 Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007 PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 2 Prologue • How is a motion described? – Motion of a particle or a group of particles can be expressed in terms of the position of the particle at any given time in classical mechanics. • A state (or a motion) of particle is expressed in terms of wave functions that represent probability of the particle occupying certain position at any given time in Quantum mechanics – With the operators provide means for obtaining values for observables, such as momentum, energy, etc • A state or motion in relativistic quantum field theory is expressed in space and time. • Equation of motion in any framework starts with Lagrangians. Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007 PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 3 Non-relativistic Equation of Motion for Spin 0 Particle Energy-momentum relation in classical mechanics give 2 p V E 2m Quantum prescriptions; p , E i . i t provides the non-relativistic equation of motion for field, y, the Schrödinger Equation V i 2m t 2 2 2 Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007 represents the probability of finding the particle of mass m at the position (x,y,z) PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 4 Relativistic Equation of Motion for Spin 0 Particle Relativistic energy-momentum relationship E p c m c p p m c 0 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 With four vector notation of quantum prescriptions; p i where ; x 1 , , , 1 2 3 0 c t x y z Relativistic equation of motion for field, y, the Klein-Gordon Equation 2nd order in time m2c2 0 2 1 mc 2 2 2 c t Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007 2 2 PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 5 Relativistic Equation of Motion (Dirac Equation) for Spin 1/2 Particle To avoid 2nd order time derivative term, Dirac attempted to factor relativistic energy-momentum relation p p m c 0 2 2 This works for the case with zero three momentum p 0 2 m c p mc p mc 0 2 2 0 0 This results in two first order equations p mc 0 0 p mc 0 0 Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007 PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 6 Dirac Equation Continued… The previous prescription does not work for the case with non-0 three momentum p p m2c2 k pk mc p mc k pk p mc k k pk m 2c 2 The terms linear to momentum should disappear, so k k To make it work, we must find coefficients k k p p pk p to satisfy: p p p p p p p p p p p p p p Other Cross Terms 0 2 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 2 1 2 3 2 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 0 0 3 0 2 3 2 3 0 0 3 The coefficients like 0=1 and 1= 2= 3=i do not work since they do not eliminate the cross terms. Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007 PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 7 Dirac Equation Continued… It would work if these coefficients are matrices that satisfy the conditions 0 2 1, 1 2 2 2 3 2 n n 0 when n Or using , n 1 Minkowski n n metric, gn 2g n where g n 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Using gamma matrices with the standard Bjorken and Drell convention 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Where si are Pauli spin matrices Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007 0 s i s 0 i i 0 1 0 i 1 0 s1 , s 2 , s 3 1 0 i 0 0 1 PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 8 Dirac Equation Continued… Using Pauli matrix as components in coefficient matrices whose smallest size is 4x4, the energy-momentum relation can now be factored p p m2c2 k pk mc p mc 0 w/ a solution p mc 0 By applying quantum prescription of momentum p i Acting the 1-D solution on a wave k i mc function, y, we obtain Dirac equation y 1 y where Dirac spinor, y y 2 y 3 y 4 Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007 PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu y y 0 9 Euler-Lagrange Equation For a conservative force, the force can be expressed as the gradient of the corresponding scalar potential, U F U dv Therefore the Newton’s law can be written m U . dt 1 Starting from Lagrangian L T U mv 2 U 2 The 1-D Euler-Lagrange fundamental equation of motion d L dt q i L qi Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007 L In 1D Cartesian Coordinate system PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu dT mvx dvx q1 L U q1 x 10 Euler-Lagrange equation in QFT Unlike particles, field occupies regions of space. Therefore in field theory, the motion is expressed in terms of space and time. Euler-Larange equation for relativistic fields is, therefore, Note the four vector form Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007 L L i i PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 11 Klein-Gordon Largangian for scalar (S=0) Field For a single, scalar field , the Lagrangian is 2 1 1 mc 2 L 2 2 Since L i and i L mc i i 2 From the Euler-Largange equation, we obtain 2 mc 0 This equation is the Klein-Gordon equation describing a free, scalar particle (spin 0) of mass m. Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007 PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 12 Dirac Largangian for Spinor (S=1/2) Field For a spinor field y, the Lagrangian L i c y y mc yy L Since y 2 0 and L i c y mc 2y y From the Euler-Largange equation for `y, we obtain mc i y y 0 Dirac equation for a particle of spin ½ and mass m. How’s Euler Lagrangian equation looks like for y? Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007 PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 13 Proca Largangian for Vector (S=1) Field Suppose we take the Lagrangian for a vector field A 2 1 1 mc n n n L A A An n A A An 16 8 2 1 1 mc n F n Fn A An 16 8 Where Fn is the field strength tensor in relativistic notation, E and B in Maxwell’s equation form an anti-symmetic second-rank tensor 0 Ex E y Ez E 0 B B x z y n F E y Bz 0 Bx Ez By Bx 0 Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007 PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 14 Proca Largangian for Vector (S=1) Field Suppose we take the Lagrangian for a vector field A 2 1 1 mc n n n L A A An n A A An 16 8 2 1 1 mc n F n Fn A An 16 8 2 L 1 n n Since A 4 A A and L 1 mc An n A 4 n From the Euler-Largange equation for A, we obtain 2 2 mc n mc n n A A A F A 0 n n Proca equation for a particle of spin 1 and mass m. For m=0, for5326, anSpring electromagnetic field. Wednesday, Feb. this 28, 2007equation is PHYS 2007 Jae Yu 15 Lagrangians • Lagrangians we discussed are concocted to produce desired field equations – L derived (L=T-V) in classical mechanics – L taken as axiomatic in field theory • The Lagrangian for a particular system is not unique – Can always multiply by a constant – Or add a divergence – Since these do not affect field equations due to cancellations Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007 PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 16 Homework • Prove that Fmn can represent Maxwell’s equations, pg. 225 of Griffith’s book. • Derive Eq. 11.17 in Griffith’s book • Due is Wednesday, Mar. 7 Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007 PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 17