pptx

advertisement

Factors that Affect Productivity in

Wintering Lakes: An Analysis of Lake

Zones and Snow Depth

Kristen Kernan

Winter Ecology- Spring 2012

Relevant Terminology

• Productivity- Amount of photosynthesis occurring due to phytoplankton

• Limnetic Zone- Open surface water in a lake, welllit, and can contain many aquatic organisms

• Littoral Zone- near shore area that can maintain aquatic plants

• Chlorophyll- a pigment present in phytoplankton used to absorb light for photosynthesis

Why Should I Care?

• Phytoplankton remain active during the winter and adjust to changing light conditions

(Marchand, 1987)

• Lake productivity is related to nutrient content and affects the number of species found in a lake

• Light is a limiting factor in wintering lakes and snow coverage can make light penetration more difficult

Background

• Evergreen Lake in Evergreen, Colorado

• Within the Bear Creak watershed and created by damming Bear Creek in 1927

• Elevation= 2,200.656 meters

• Size= .1699 km^2

Bear Creek Watershed

Background (cont.)

• Heavily used for recreational purposes: ice skating, ice fishing, resides on the outskirts of a golf course

• Completely ice covered

• Snow covered on ~90% of the lake except for the area cleared for ice skating

Research Question and Hypotheses

• Question: Is the limnetic zone or the littoral zone more productive?

– If the limnetic zone is less productive then levels of chlorophyll will be higher in the littoral zone

• Question: How is productivity affected by snow coverage?

– If productivity is affected by snow coverage then sites with less snow will have higher levels of chlorophyll

Methods: Sample Collection

• Samples were collected using a 2-liter Van Dorn and then stored in a cooler to limit light exposure and temperature change

– Limnetic

• Central Location

• Depth= 4.1 meters

• Ice Thickness=30 cm

• Snow Depth= 35 cm

• Samples were taken at 1meter and 3 meter depths

– Littoral 1

• Near-shore site

• Depth=1.5 meters

• Ice thickness= 15 cm

• Snow Depth= .5cm

• Sample taken at 1 meter depth

– Littoral 2

• Depth=1.5 meters

• Ice thickness= 25 cm

• Snow Depth= 35 cm

• Sample taken at 1 meter depth

Methods: Filtration, Extraction, and

Analysis of Chlorophyll

• Samples were filtered using a glass fiber and stored in a plastic test tube and kept in a freezer until extraction

• 10 mL of ethanol was placed in each test tube

• Chlorophyll was extracted at 78 degrees

Celsius (the boiling point of ethanol)

• Post extraction samples were filtered once more and then ran on a spectrophotometer at wavelengths of 665nm and 750nm.

6,4

6,3

6,3

6,2

6,2

6,1

6,1

6,0

6,0

5,9

5,9

Results: Limnetic Vs. Littoral

Chlorophyll in micrograms/liter: Limnetic vs. Littoral

6.3 ug/l

6.0 ug/l

6.2 ug/l

• Chlorophyll was fairly uniform from Limnetic to

Littoral

• Increasing lake depth at limnetic site showed a decrease in chlorophyll by

.3ug/l

Limnetic: 1 meter

Limnetic: 2 meter

Littoral: 1 meter

Results: Snow Depth Comparison

6,0

5,0

4,0

3,0

2,0

1,0

0,0

9,0

8,0

7,0

Chlorophyll in micrograms/liter Between Sites

8.2 ug/l

6.2 ug/l

Litt 30cm Litt 2mm

• Higher amounts of chlorophyll at littoral site with half centimeter of snow

Discussion

• Rejection of hypothesis that littoral zone is more productive than limnetic zone in winter lakes

– Chlorophyll at both locations about equal

• Acceptance of hypothesis concerning snow depths affect on productivity

– More snow coverage=less algae=less photosynthesis

• Chlorophyll levels indicate the lake is on the low side of being Mesotrophic (Carlson R.E. and J. Simpson,

1996)

– Some evidence suggesting that this may be a characteristic of a wintering lake (French et al., 2007)

Discussion (cont.)

• Bear Creek Reservoir in comparison(Clayshulte

2010):

– Same watershed

– Lower elevation

– Eutrophic lake

– February of 2010 chlorophyll 14 ug/l

– Has experienced algal blooms

Conclusion

• Near shore versus open water doesn’t appear to be much of a factor concerning chlorophyll in wintering lakes

• Snow depth has a larger impact on productivity due to the availability of light

• If given the opportunity to re-do project:

– Couple data with hydrolab depth analysis

– Pick a known eutrophic lake

– Collected more samples

Literature Cited

• Carlson R.E. and J. Simpson. “A Coordinator's Guide to Volunteer

Lake Monitoring Methods.” North American Lake Management

Society. (1996):96 pp. Print.

• Clayshulte, Russell. “2010 Annual Report for the Water Quality

Control Commission.” Bear Creek Watershed Association (2010): 1-

38. Print

• French, Todd, and Ellen Petticrew. "Chlorophyll a seasonality in four shallow eutrophic lakes (northern British Columbia, Canada) and the critical roles of internal phosphorus loading and temperature."

Hydrobiologia 575 (2007): 285-299. Print.

• Marchand, Peter J. Life in the cold: an introduction to winter

ecology. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1987. Print.

Download