Class 2: Defining Canada Business in the Canadian Context ADMS 1010 – Section Instructor Alex Browning Email: browning@yorku.ca Web Site: http://alexatyork.com/bus_class.html Class 2: Implications of Federalism on Business Agenda • Class Admin • Summary from Class 1 • Video – • Introduction to the System of Federalism • Canada vs United States • Break • Evolving Nature of Canada’s Confederation • Arrangement of Federal-Provincial Relations • Government and Regional Diversities and Disparities • Banking Industry • Q&A Class 2: Implications of Federalism on Business Outcomes By the end of the class you will: • Understand the system of Federalism and how it works in Canada • Understand the competing forces within confederation and how they shape business and government interactions in Canada • Have a high level understanding of how the Canadian Banking system came into being Summary of Class 1: Ideologies How do we perceive our Economy? News Items Housing Starts Trade Figures Employment Rate GDP Balance of Trade Porter’s Diamond Adapted by the Martin Prosperity Institute from Michael Porter, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Free Press. 1990 9 May 2011 Alison Kemper ADMS 1010 7 Porter’s 5 Force Existing Domestic Rivalry Threat of New Entrants Threat of Substitute Productsm& Services Power of Buyers Power of Suppliers STAGES OF NATIONAL COMPETITIVE DEVELOPMENT 1. 2. 3. 4. Factor-Driven Stage Investment-Driven Stage Innovation-Driven Stage Wealth Driven Stage Copyright © Captus Press Inc., 2009 Diamond of Sustainable Growth Stern School of Business Section 3: Major Political, Social and Economic Ideologies What is an Ideology? It refers to a set of shared values, beliefs and ideas, and perceptions through which persons interpret events of the past, present and future. It also refers to an explicit doctrinal structure providing a particular diagnosis of the ills of society. It will include an accompanying action program for implementing the prescribed solution. Reasons for Change in Society Interactions among competing groups with dominant or counter ideology result in changes in society. – – – Social Upheaval changes status quo – – Poor versus Rich (French Revolution) Rich versus Rich (American Revolution) Poor versus Poor (Peru 1980’s) Great Depression War Technological Changes impact social order – – Industrial Revolution Information Revolution Reasons for Change in Society Changing Social and Business Demographics Feudal Era Mercantile Era Industrial Era Technological Era Information Era ? Types of Social Ideologies 1. Collectivist Ideologies 2. Individualist Ideologies Collectivist Collectivist ideologies: Rather than leaving the individual to pursue his or her own ends, the state ensures that the individual serves the interests of society when taken as a whole. Collectivists focus on community and society, and seek to give priority to group goals over individual goals Collectivist Ideologies Socialist Democratic Socialist Conservative Individualist Ideologies The individualist theory of government holds that the state should take a merely defensive role by protecting the liberty of each individual to act as he or she wishes as long he or she does not infringe on the same liberty of another. Ayn Rand (1905-1982) Individualist Ideologies Liberalism Modern/Reform Liberal Neo-Liberalism Ayn Rand (1905-1982) Economic Ideologies Capitalism Communism Mixed Economy Section 4: The Ideological Framework of Canada The dominant Ideologies of Canada Today Political Conservatism Reform Liberalism Social Democracy Economic Capitalism within the context of a mixed economy. Commanding Heights PBS Production Based upon the book by: Daniel Yergin Joseph Stanislaw Class 2: Defining Canada Early Governments in Canada Government of New France – 1608-1759 Feudal System – Augmented by Fur Trade Aristocracy with Samuel de Champlain being the first colonial ruler 1608-1635 Oligarchy – Corporate governance Triumvirate Council of Governor, Bishop and Intendant Diamond of Sustainable Growth Stern School of Business Early Governments British Government 1759-1867 – – – Defeat of French - Battle of the Plains of Abraham 1759 French permanently give up Canada 1763 – Treaty of Paris which ended the Seven Years War in Europe Significant attempts were made to Anglicise the population. Support English migration from US Limit Catholic Church Early Governments On the verge of US revolutionary war British attempt to win French support the British governor passed the Quebec Act 1774 giving the Church more power, allowing Catholics to hold office and for French to maintain their own civil law. Guy Carleton British Governor of Quebec 1768-1778 Revolutionary War, 1775-1783 After U.S. Revolutionary War 50,000 Empire Loyalists who did not want independence from Britian fled persecution and came north to Quebec, New Brunswick which resulted in Britian creating the Province of Nova Scotia to handle the increase. 29 Alison Kemper ADMS 1010 9 May 2011 United Empire Loyalists Those that came to Quebec did not like living under the French influence so the British government created the Constitution Act of 1791 and split Quebec along the Ottawa Valley and created Upper and Lower Canada. 30 Upper & Lower Canada While the British ruled through a Lieutenant Governor, who spent most of their time in Europe, and an elected assemble, the effect rule was left to an executive group who were appointed for life. Family Compact – Upper Canada Chateau Clique - Lower Canada They were members of the high clergy, wealthy businessmen and traders, the high-ranking military officers, and large landowners Unrest Rest Power resting with this select few cause unrest amongst the population Lead to Rebellions in both Upperm1837 and Lower Canada in 1837 & 1838 Upper Canada – William Lyon Mackenzie Lower Canada - Louis-Joseph Papineau, Wolfred Nelson, Robert Nelson Durham Report 1838 After the two Rebellions Britian sends Lord Durham to investigate and to make recommendations Create a responsible government Unite Upper and Lower Canada 1841 Act of Union Lead Up to Confederation Civil War and Raiders from US caused concern Political instability in the new province of Canada John A. Macdonald and other delegates created the 72 resolutions that lead to the British America Act in 1867 establishing a confederation of provinces but with a strong central government to avoid US problems Federal Legislative Powers Constitution Act 1982 Sec. 91 “It shall be lawful for the Queen, by the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons to make Laws for the Peace, Order and good Government of Canada.” Canada Health Act, International Trade, Defense, Transport Canada, Fisheries. Provincial Legislative Powers Section 92 and 93 on Canada’s Constitution distributes exclusive legislative powers to the provinces over regional interests. Example: Cities and Towns, Education, the provision of Health Care, Welfare and Transportation, Direct Taxation, protection of property, exploration and development and government and management of non-renewable resources Canadian Government Structure State Structures •Unitary State •Federalism What is a Unitary State? A unitary state is a state or country that is governed constitutionally as one single unit, with one constitutionally created legislature. Governmental power may well be transferred to lower levels, to regionally or locally elected assemblies, governors and mayors ("devolved government"), but in a unitary state the central government has the principal right to recall such delegated power. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki Unitary States Examples of a Unitary State • Great Britain • France • China • Japan What is Federalism? Emphasizes the legal and institutional aspects of the system. It has been defined as the method of dividing powers so that the general or central regional governments are each within there sphere coordinate and independent. Federalism Sharing of Power • Economic • Constitutional • Political Principles of Federalism ● Governmental power is distributed between a central or national authority and regional state or provincial authorities ● Every individual is subject to the laws of each, both the central government and the regional government ● Neither levels can subordinate or over rule the other where powers specified ● Where powers not explicitly granted they are assumed to be part of either the central or the regional authority Federalism Examples of Federations Canada USA Australia India Equality in Federalism In no federation does perfect equality exist between all in the federation. Federal Government holds the power in all unspecified areas PEI does not have the same role or power as Ontario. Why? Federal Government can over-rule regions in states of emergency – War Measures Act – AntiInflation Board Problems of Federalism Conflicts in fiscal policy. Federalism can protect the status quo or move to change them. Federalism can act as a barrier to change Conflicts in ideology What are the challenges to Canadian Federalism? • • • • Duality of federalism. The country versus the regions. Vast geographic distances. Changing economic and social circumstances Nature of Regions. Many areas of Canada were independent prior to Confederation and have their own distinct identities. Evolving Confederation • • • • • • • • • • British Columbia Alberta Saskatchewan Manitoba Ontario Quebec New Brunswick Nova Scotia PEI Newfoundland 1871 1905 1905 1870 1867 1867 1867 1867 1873 1949 A Federal System is a Balance Federal Federal Government provides peace and security for the entire nation Provincial Provincial Governments retain sufficient powers to regulate local matters Judicial Powers A method of authoritative interpretation of the constitutional division of the legislative power The testing of the constitutional validity of laws both at the Federal and Provincial Levels Differences between US and Canada In Canada All powers not specifically reserved for the provinces are allotted to the Federal government. House of Commons democratically representative Senate Appointed Co-operative Federalism – Marble Cake In the United States All powers not specifically reserved for the Federal government are allotted to the States. House of Representatives (Congress) democratically representative Senate Elected and Equal Dual Federalism – Layer Cake Bank of Canada Created in 1934 as a private bank and in 1938 became a Federal Crown Corporation The responsibilities of the Bank are: monetary policy; sole issuer of Canadian banknotes and currency, the promotion of a safe, sound financial system within Canada; and funds management and central banking services "for the federal government, the Bank and other clients. Money, Business and Federalism Canada’s Financial Institutions The Canadian financial services sector is made up of banks, trust and loan companies, credit unions and caisses populaires, life and health insurance companies, property and casualty (P&C) insurance companies, securities dealers and exchanges, mutual fund companies and distributors, finance and leasing companies, as well as independent financial advisors, pension fund managers and independent insurance agents and brokers. Banks represent the largest portion of the Canadian financial services sectorthe 6 largest Canadian banks still account for more than 90 per cent of total bank assets and for about 76 per cent of the total assets of the deposit-taking sector. Canada’s Financial Institutions Sector Banks Number of active firms Employment1 69 237,000 1,298 53,000 Trust companies 29 n/a Life and health insurance companies2 108 118,000 P&C insurance companies 230 100,000 Mutual fund companies3 270 70,0004 Securities dealers3 Finance and leasing companies 207 37,000 250 n/a Credit unions/caisses populaires Canada’s Financial Institutions Canada's banks and life and health insurers are significant participants in international markets. The six largest banks generated 33 per cent of their net income from foreign sources in 2003, while 58 per cent of the life and health insurance sector's premium income was derived from foreign sources Canada’s Financial Institutions Under the constitution the federal and provincial governments share jurisdiction over the financial services sector. The Government of Canada has sole jurisdiction for banks while credit unions/caisses populaires, securities dealers and mutual funds are largely regulated by provincial governments. Both levels of government regulate insurance and trust and loan companies. Market conduct is regulated at the provincial level and companies that are federally incorporated are regulated by the Federal government. Ontario no longer provides for the incorporation of new trust and loan companies in its jurisdiction. Canada’s Financial Institutions The Government of Canada provides prudential oversight of banks through the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI). Federally incorporated Trust and Insurance Companies are regulated the Trust and Loan Companies Act On October 1, 2009, for Credit Unions and Caisse-Populaires regulations responsibilities were transferred from Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) to Deposit Insurance Corporation of Ontario (DICO) The legislation governing Canada's federally regulated financial institutions is subject to review every five years. Consumer Protection the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation (CDIC), a federal Crown corporation, insures deposits in banks and trust and loan companies against loss in the event of member failure up to $100,000[3] per depositor in each member institution The Deposit Insurance Corporation of Ontario (DICO) is an Ontario Provincial Agency established under the Credit Unions and Caisses Populaires Act, 1994. All eligible deposits are insured up to $100,000 per depositor in each organization and fully insures all eligible deposits in registered accounts (i.e. RRSP’s). Part 2 The fiscal and institutional arrangements of federal-provincial relations The Great Canadian Dream Canada's confederation on July 1, 1867 brought four eastern provinces together to form a new country. As part of the deal, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick were promised a railway to link them with the two Central Canadian provinces – Quebec and Ontario. Manitoba joined confederation in 1870. British Columbia, on the west coast, was enticed to join the new confederation in 1871, but only with the promise that a transcontinental railway be built within 10 years to physically link east and west. Canadian Pacific Railway was formed in 1881. Show Me the Money! Fiscal and administrative arrangements are a key component of federal provincial relations. How much and who gets what is the defining question of the Dominion of Canada. Politics plays a key role, but there are other elements. Fiscal and Institutional Arrangements From 1867-1929 Provinces gained more an more power from the Federal government Many provinces gained control over crown lands Gain control over mineral rights Growth of importance of Provincial roles in Education, Health and Welfare Factors Contributing to Increased Federal Activism The Great Depression and the need for Federal Government help? Federalism was influenced by the economic theories of John Maynard Keynes. Federal authority was seen under Keynes’ economic model to be the provider of economic stability through the use of the Central Bank to regulate money supply an Start of WWII and the War Measures Act Keynesian Philosophy Increased Federal Activism - Post WWII Department of Finance Officials believed that the federal government must ensure economic stability through management of the money supply by the Bank of Canada through tax cuts and additional government spending in a period of economic downturn Keynesian Philosophy Contributed to Centralized Federalism – Post WW II To forestall a post-war recession, the Federal Government embarked on a program of postwar reconstruction and social spending. Paternalistic Liberal Government Cooperative Federalism • Federal and Provincial Governments agree to work together in areas that are clearly the domain of one or the other • Four Main Features • Reliance on Federal-Provincial conferences • Federal Government agreed to consult with provinces before committing to programs • Policies designed as fiscal programs to create economic stability and growth – Cost sharing • Formal structures to support intergovernmental relations • Lead to a more integrated Federalism Cooperative Federalism The Federal Government provided financial assistance, either in a lump sum or fixed ratio of the cost of a program, on the condition that the provincial governments provide certain services Federal Government used these grants to involve itself in virtually all areas of provincial jurisdiction Used transfer payments to entice the provinces into adopting new national programs. Benefit of Conditional/Shared Cost Grants Served to inhibit conflict Shared knowledge and provided basis for resolving disputes Administrative consultation among officials tended to involve low levels of conflict It was a movement toward greater partnership Problems with Conditional/Shared Cost Grants Conditional grants can distort provincial budgetary priorities. The federal government can increase their influence in areas of Provincial jurisdiction. The Provinces could refuse grants, however, the realities of politics makes this unlikely. Interest groups will pressure provinces into accepting grants. – Example: Medicare 2002. All provinces signed on to the Federal funding offer even though many were opposed due to budgetary constraints Problem with Conditional/Shared Cost Programs Provinces still felt the Federal Government was interfering with Provincial powers Provinces resented the Federal Government taking a paternalistic attitude, that they knew what was best for each province Programs did not affect provinces equally Executive Federalism Quebec often opted out of Federal Programs though wanted the money to do their own. (Double Image Federalism) Provinces began to take more activist roles in economic and social policy and demand great control over revenue and spending Lead to a more Executive Federalism First Minister Conferences Conferences Federal Provincial Conferences - The federal government set the agenda and therefore hold the advantage. Topics include the constitution, transfers, health, education, CPP, etc. First Minister’s Meetings – Held between the Premiers and the Prime Minister. Recently the Premiers have dominated the agenda. Held behind closed doors. Joint Statement. Secrecy is important. (Why?) Part 4: Regional Diversities and Disparities OVERVIEW OF THE SECTORAL STRUCTURE OF CANADA’S ECONOMY Evolution of Canada’s economy – From agrarian to manufacturing and then to servicebased Development of Canada’s corporate sector – – High degree of concentration of wealth and corporate power High degree of foreign ownership Copyright © Captus Press Inc., 2009 Sectoral Structure of Canada’s Economy from 1901-1961 Copyright © Captus Press Inc., 2009 SHIFTS IN EMPLOYMENT Employment is shifting away from the agricultural sector. – Shift is attributed to an increase in the productivity of agricultural labour Due to increasing sophistication and mechanization of agricultural production Great increases in the goods production and service industries Copyright © Captus Press Inc., 2009 Sectoral Structure of Canada’s Economy from 1960-2005 Copyright © Captus Press Inc., 2009 EFFECT OF SHIFT TO SERVICE SECTOR Canadians will require different and greater level of job skills to be successful Government must adapt new industrial, tax and regional policies to reflect shifts Strategy is difficult because not all provinces equal Need to manage these differences Copyright © Captus Press Inc., 2009 Regional Differences Influenced by immigration patterns. Economics Cultural differences Resource differences Historic differences Regional Differences Size of internal market and access for products. Ontario vs. PEI Natural Resources – Inherently volatile Occupational mobility, fishing and mining Spatial immobility “I like it here!” Claim to capital, i.e. Bank Loans Feds try to Manage Regional Differences three ways. 1. 2. 3. Industrial Incentive Programs Infrastructure Assistance Programs Social adjustment and rural development programs. Industrial Incentive Programs Make viable industries attractive in slow growth regions. Tax credits, seed money, consulting services. Oil and Gas in Newfoundland. Infrastructure Assistance Programs Assist in providing capital for sewers, water, road improvement, hospitals and universities. Example: Toronto to Montreal high-speed rail proposal. Social adjustment and rural development programs. Try to develop industries in areas where there is little or no productive employment. Example: The soap stone carving industry in Nunavut. Ontario Wine Industry Flaws of Regional Development Industrial incentive programs favor capital-intensive programs in areas where one of the major problems is excess labor. (Mega-projects). Do the companies really need the grants, or would they have done it anyway? Grants to one company could hurt other existing companies who have not received grants. Flaws of Regional Development Industrial incentive programs may accrue to multinational companies in foreign countries. Could lead to ‘bidding wars’ between neighboring provinces or countries to secure the relocation of large companies. Example: Ontario’s Green Energy Deal Samsung Diamond of Sustainable Growth Stern School of Business Need for a Stable Banking System Case: The Bank Act of 1871 Commanding Heights PBS Production Based upon the book by: Daniel Yergin Joseph Stanislaw Next Week Canada expands—Agriculture and Manufacturing Readings – Civics Canada Online Textbook Agriculture in Canada Manufacturing in Canada Statscan Information on Manufacturing Case: Relentless Change, Massey Harris Company, pp. 60-76 First Group Assignment -- On Massey Case