Roca - Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute

advertisement

Cyto-nuclear genomic dissociation in African elephant species

Alfred L. Roca * , Nicholas Georgiadis

‡ and Stephen J. O’Brien †

*

Basic Research Program, SAIC-Frederick, and

Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA

Mpala Research Center, PO Box 555, Nanyuki, Kenya

FIGURE 1: INTRODUCTION

Multiple lines of evidence suggest that forest and savanna elephants are distinct species.

Measurements from 295 skulls demonstrated that forest and savanna elephants fall into two morphologically distinct groups (left panel; Groves and Grubb, 2000).

Nuclear gene analyses using both slower-evolving nuclear gene sequences (center; Roca

et al.

, 2001) and more rapidly evolving microsatellites (right; Comstock

et al.

, 2002) demonstrated a deep genetic split between forest and savanna elephants, estimated at 3.5 million years. Only a few morphological intermediates and genetic hybrids were detected in a zone of mixed habitat that surrounds the tropical forests of Africa.

In contrast to the distinctions between forest and savanna elephants detected by morphological and nuclear genetic studies, analyses using mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) have detected genetic diversity in savanna elephants high enough to appear incongruent with nuclear DNA studies, and suggested greater mixing between forest and savanna elephants. To investigate this apparent disparity, we sampled wild elephant tissue from 21 African locations to determine the DNA sequences for 1642 biparentally inherited chromosomal segments in 3 X-linked genes, and 302 mtDNA and 128 Y chromosome sequences.

METHODS

DNA was extracted from samples from wild African elephants and captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) . Three nuclear gene segments ( BGN , PHKA2 and PLP) ; a portion of the mitochondrial gene ND5 , and a Y-chromosome gene fragment ( AMELY ) were amplified and sequenced .

Sequences were aligned using CLUSTALX. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using maximum parsimony (MP), neighbor joining (NJ), and maximum likelihood (ML) methods implemented in PAUP*4.0b10.

African

Forest

(A) (B)

(C)

Asian

Savannah elephants

SOUTHERN

CH-Chobe

HW-Hwange

KR-Kruger

NA-Namibia

MA-Mashatu

SA-Savuti

SW-Sengwa

ZZ-Zambezi

Savannah elephants

EASTERN

AB-Aberdares

AM-Amboseli

MK-Mount Kenya

KE-Central Kenya

NG-Ngorongoro

SE-Serengeti

TA-Tarangire

Savannah elephants

NORTH-CENTRAL

BE-Benoue

WA-Waza

Asian elephants

Forest elephants

DS-DzangaSangha

LO-Lope

GA-Garamba

16 microsatellite loci

Comstock et al. 2002

African

Savanna

BGN, 646 bp, n=556 PHKA2, 1012 bp, n=440

PLP, 479 bp, n=657

FIGURE 2

Haplotypes for three biparentally-inherited nuclear genes display almost complete separation among three elephant taxa.

MP trees are shown. The length of each gene segment and number of chromosomes examined are indicated for each gene. Number of chromosomes per haplotype is proportional to the size of circles; differences between alleles are proportional to the distance between circles. Haplotypes/alleles found in Asian elephants are red; African forest haplotypes are green; and African savanna haplotypes are blue. (A)

BGN

haplotypes are completely distinct between forest and savanna populations. (B)

PHKA2

proved to be the most diverse nuclear gene segment; the chromosomes examined were completely distinct between forest and savanna populations.(C)

PLP

haplotypes were distinct between forest and savanna elephants except for one haplotype, indicated by the arrow. This common forest elephant haplotype is present in two individuals from

Cameroon.

FIGURE 3

Maternally and paternally inherited markers demonstrate cytonuclear dissociation.

Phylogenetic relationships for Asian,

African forest, and African savanna elephants inferred from (A) 319 bp of the maternally inherited mitochondrial

ND5

gene (number of individuals with identical haplotypes indicated by location), and from (B)

1551 bp of the paternally inherited Y chromosome gene

AMELY

(each individual shown separately). Forest populations or individuals are indicated in green; savanna in blue;

Asian elephants in red. Garamba

(GR) is a mixed habitat zone and is not colored.

(A) mtDNA ND5

319 bp

DS (5)

DS (11)

BE (1)

GR (1)

DS (8)

62/74/78

IIB

DS (1), OD (2) BE (2), WA (1)

CH (1), HW (6), SA (8), ZZ (4)

HW (2), NG (4), SA (2), SE (9), TA (1), ZZ (1)

GR (10)

89/92/97

II

94/96/98

IIA

DS (1), LO (9), OD (1)

BE (1), WA (1)

LO (2)

BE (1), WA (2)

100/100/100

90/91/87

70/66/63

AB (6), AM (34), CH (5), KE (16), KR (12) MA (1),

MK (1), NA (21), NG (3), SE (1), SW (5), TA (6)

AB (1), AM (2), KE (4)

CH (3), HW (4), KR (25), MA (3), SW (5)

I

64/64/63

AB (1), KE (17), WA (4)

GR (1)

BE (1), WA (1)

Elephas maximus (1)

0.005 substitutions/site

(B) Y chromosome AMELY

1551 bp

99/99/98

II

87/93/90

I

NG2215

NG2229

SA0972

SA0993

SA0994

SA1002

SA1004

SA1005

SA1009

SE2051

SE2098

SE2101

SE2103

SE2104

SE2106

SE2165

TA1144

TA1145

TA1431

TA1443

TA1450

TA1458

WA4020

WA4022

WA4027

ZZ0145

ZZ0148

AM4576

AM4583

AM4584

AM4585

AM4587

BE4035

BE4053

CH0882

CH0885

CH0895

CH0931

HW0062

HW0067

HW0076

HW0082

HW0086

HW0092

AM0003

AM0005

AM0007

AM0015

AM0018

AM0019

AM0020

AM0021

AM0023

AM0030

AM0035

AM4551

HW0112

HW0115

HW0117

HW0120

HW0122

HW0124

HW0151

KE4501

KE4509

KE4511

KE4516

KE4517

KE4549

KE4550

KE4601

KE4607

KE4609

NA4697

NA4699

NA4702

NA4704

NA4710

NG2178

NG2180

NG2181

NG2182

NG2191

NG2192

NG2193

NG2194

NG2214

KE4614

KE4617

KE4620

KE4621

KE4623

KR0114

MA0807

NA4653

NA4660

NA4665

NA4668

NA4669

NA4670

NA4671

NA4675

NA4678

NA4688

0.001 substitutions/site

63/80/64

DS1503

DS1505

DS1511

DS1527

DS1528

DS1530

DS1532

DS1543

LO3505

BE4059

DS1504

DS1521

DS1523

DS1524

DS1555

OD0001

GR0016

GR0022

DS1537

DS1556

LO3517

Ema006

LO mtDNA biparental Y chro.

n=11 n=65 n=2

WA mtDNA biparental Y chro.

AB

KE

MK n=58 n=280 n=15 BE

OD

3 7 1

DS

26

GR

1

1

11

BE

3

171

48

1

5

4

26

1

WA

1

5 94

SE

3

9 44

NG

4

1

32

TA

ND5

6

15

3

1

2

3

7

11

67 7

BGN

PLP

PHKA2

AMELY

OD

NA

R

SA

CH

ZZ SW

HW

MA

KR

KE

MK

AB

SE

NG

AM

TA

AM

CH

SA

8

35

11

4

HW

8

SW

ZZ

5

10

149

154

71

46

MA

KR

NA

4

37

21

ND5

56

170

157

17

11

13

2

1

2

15

BGN

PLP

PHKA2

AMELY

DS-Dzanga Sangha, LO-Lope, OD-Odzala, GR-Garamba, AB-Aberdares, AM-

Amboseli, BE-Benoue, CH-Chobe, HW-Hwange, KE-Central Kenya, KR-Kruger,

MA-Mashatu, MK-Mount Kenya, NA-Namibia, NG-Ngorongoro, SA-Savuti, SE-

Serengeti, SW-Sengwa, TA-Tarangire, WA-Waza, ZZ-Zambezi.

FIGURE 4

Distribution of cytonuclear disequilibrium.

Pie charts indicate by locale the distribution of genetic markers that are inherited maternally

(left pie chart in each set of three), paternally

(right), or biparentally (center). Totals indicate the number of individuals (mtDNA, Y chromosomes) or combined number of chromosome segments (biparental genes) examined.

Map indicates locations of sampled elephant populations in Africa. Green circles are forest locations. Blue circles are savanna locations.

Garamba (GR) includes both habitats. Orange indicates current African elephant range; historic range includes entire land area shown.

FIGURE 5: CONCLUSIONS

Cytonuclear disequilibrium suggests historic unidirectional hybridization (i.e., savanna males and forest females) with subsequent unidirectional backcrossing to larger reproductively successful savanna males, swamping the forest nuclear genomic contribution. The interactions between forest and savanna elephants inferred from differing patterns detected by maternally-inherited

versus

paternally- or biparentally-inherited genes are as follows:

Herd#1

Herd#2

A A

(A) Male-mediated gene flow occurs between adjacent forest elephant herds, and between adjacent savanna elephant herds; however (B) interbreeding between savanna and forest elephants at the contact zone

Forest habitat

B

C between forest and savanna habitats is rare. (C) As forest habitat retreats (or when forest herds move into savanna habitats), larger male savanna elephants have increased opportunity to hybridize with forest female elephants. However, (D) the smaller forest and hybrid males do not reproduce due either to outbreeding depression or to reproductive

D dominance by larger unhybridized savanna males. (E) After multiple generations of unidirectional hybridization, nuclear genes alleles are those of savanna elephants, although a forest mitochondrial haplotype is retained in the now-savanna herds.

Savanna habitat

E Forest mtDNA, savanna nuclear DNA

Savanna mtDNA and nuclear DNA

References and Acknowledgments

Comstock, K. E., Georgiadis, N., Pecon-Slattery, J., Roca, A. L., Ostrander, E. A., O'Brien, S. J. and Wasser, S. K. (2002) Patterns of molecular genetic variation among African elephant populations. Mol Ecol.11:2489-98.

Groves, C. P. and Grubb, P. (2000) Do Loxodonta cyclotis and L. africana interbreed? Elephant 2(4):4-7.

Roca, A. L., Georgiadis, N., Pecon-Slattery, J. and O'Brien, S. J. (2001) Genetic evidence for two species of elephant in Africa. Science 293(5534):1473-7.

Roca, A. L., Georgiadis, N. and O'Brien, S. J. (2003) Male-driven genomic chimerization of elephant herds in Africa. In preparation.

We thank R. Ruggiero, W. J. Murphy, E. Eizirik, A. Brandt, M. P. Gough, B. Gough, M. J. Malasky, J. Arthur, R. L. Hill, D. Munroe, S. Cevario, N. J. Crumpler, G. K. Pei, K. M. Helgen. For elephant samples, we thank A.

Turkalo, J. M. Fay, R. Weladji, W. Karesh, M. Lindeque, W. Versvelt, K. Hillman Smith, F. Smith, M. Tchamba, S. Gartlan, P. Aarhaug, A. M. Austmyr, Bakari, Jibrila, J. Pelleteret, L. White, M. Habibou, M. W. Beskreo, D.

Pierre, C. Tutin, M. Fernandez, R. Barnes, B. Powell, G.

Doungoubé, M. Storey, M. Phillips, B. Mwasaga, A. Mackanga-Missandzou, B. York and A. Baker at the Burnet Park Zoo, and M. Bush at the National Zoological

Park. We thank the governments of Botswana, Cameroon, the Central African Republic, Congo (Brazzaville), Congo (Kinshasa), Gabon, Kenya, Namibia, South Africa, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe for permission to collect samples. Tissues were obtained in full compliance with specific Federal Fish and Wildlife Permits (endangered/threatened species and CITES Permits US 750138 and US 756611 to N.G.). For funding we thank the U. S.

Fish and Wildlife Service, National Geographic Society, and European Union (through the Wildlife Conservation Society). This publication has been funded in part with Federal funds from the National Cancer Institute,

National Institutes of Health, under Contract No. N01-CO-12400. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Download