English 990 – Writing a Synthesis Essay For this essay, we are going to focus on two important critical thinking processes: analysis and synthesis. So, let’s review what we already know about these two words and/or add to our understanding of what we need to do in order to be GREAT critical thinkers. Analysis: Analysis is the process of breaking something down into its parts to see how they function. But let’s face it, that is a pretty simplistic definition of an incredibly amazing thing that we, as thinkers, can do. Let’s look at an example. Let’s say you just bought a used car. You bought it from a relative, and he assured you that it was in good shape and good repair. You paid him $2500 dollars for it, and that took all your savings and a loan from your parents. On the first day that you get that car out on the freeway, it starts to make a strange sound. You’ve never heard this sound from a car before, so you are worried. As you keep driving, the noise gets louder and a little more high pitched. You take the next exit and see there a run-down garage with the sign that says, “Car Repair.” YEA! As you pull in, the mechanic comes out and hears your car’s noise. He says, “You need some new tires. I’ve got some right here. I can install them on your car for $500.00.” Do you buy them? Do you let this mechanic fix your problem? Well, if you are an astute automobile owner, you know that this situation is not that easily fixed. You know that you are going to need some analysis of the real problem. The mechanic has not even opened up the hood of your car to see if something is smoking under there. He hasn’t asked you about the conditions where you first heard the sound, and he hasn’t asked you how the car behaved as you drove. He hasn’t run any diagnostics…because he hasn’t analyzed. And there is no way that you should pay him for the tires that he is trying to sell you. That process of analysis is the key feature of most of our problem-solving in our real lives, and the trick is to then apply it to the texts that we are reading. We have two texts that we are going to consider in writing this essay, Edgar Allan Poe’s two short stories: “The Cask of Amontillado” and “The Tell-Tale Heart.” Once we have analyzed these two stories, we’ll know more of what we can synthesize. The Process of Analysis: 1. Before reading, access whatever information you may have about these two stories or Poe or American lit or anything else you may have read by or about this author. If you don’t know anything, that makes things a little more difficult, but it isn’t impossible. (Here’s one of the biggest advantages to reading: you get a lot of background information that you can draw from as you continue on in life.) 2. Make any notes on the text that you are reading—if you can. In this situation, you have copies of both stories that you can mark up and annotate. If you can’t mark up the text that you are going to work from, it wouldn’t hurt you to invest in some PostIt notes. You will need to take notes as you read. 3. As you read, make sure that you have engaged with the best reading strategies you know. Mark the words that you don’t understand or that you may need to have clarified. Mark any descriptions of characters or events that stand out. Mark the direct comments of the author that may lead you to a greater understanding of the main idea in the text. Put question marks or one-word references to indicate where you had a new idea or where something seemed particularly relevant. 4. After reading, take some time to think about the story. Summarize the main events. 5. Discuss your observations and ideas with a peer to clarify the events that happened. Repeat this process with the second source. Make sure that you have a very clear understanding of the two stories. For this essay, your pre-writing is a Venn Diagram. This type of a graphic organizer requires you to consider all the points and evidence for one side, all the points and evidence for the other side, and then the points and evidence that the two sides share. This helps you see what the two stories have in common and can help you find the evidence to prove what you know. Synthesis: Once you have analyzed and evaluated your sources, the next step is to find the elements that these two texts share. Your goal is to present a deeper understanding of the two stories AND to show how these two stories highlight some aspect of human behavior that we can view and analyze. Is this a lesson that we have learned? Well, not necessarily. I don’t think that you really have to be told that it isn’t a good thing to trick your friend into going into a catacomb with you where you are planning on leaving her or him behind a newly created wall to starve and die alone. But does it have something to say about how we let insults and perceived We have talked a little about how they are both about murders. One is a murder of a man’s “friend.” One is a murder of a man’s employer. One is a torturous death. One is how the murderer himself is tortured. So, it is important to come up with what they have in common. They are both about a pre-meditated murder. In both of these cases, a character has decided that someone else simply cannot live on, but the desire not to be punished is strong. They are both about an obsessive need to kill someone. Each story has an element of being wronged. Both of these killers think they are entitled to decide that someone else must die. These stories have an element of torture for the victim. Is that an essential element for murder? Does that make it more satisfying? Is killing one’s enemy satisfying? In one of these stories, the murderer gets away with the murder and in the other, he confesses almost immediately. Does that mean that it was not satisfying? Both of these murders take place because of a motive that may seem strange to us. Does that hint at a reality that we don’t really understand other people’s motives? You may have other elements that are the same in the two stories, and you are free to use your own ideas to construct your thesis. The Thesis: For this essay, then, we are going to need a thesis that addresses both of these works and a theme that is common or that can be compared in both of them. A thesis statement is the statement that the writer is going to prove with the essay, so it helps a lot to come up with a question that will guide the development of the paper first, and then write the thesis to answer that question. Here’s an example: Do we have a right to take revenge? Now, in both of these stories, we have examples of revenge murders: one is for some imagined insults, and one is because of an imagined glaring evil eye. So, my next step is to figure out how I’m going to use these two stories to answer the question. I personally think that there are some things that we can take revenge for…someone who bullies, for example. But is revenge in general a good thing? Probably not. So, if I think that, how can I use these two stories to illustrate that we shouldn’t take revenge? Well, it does seem to me that in both stories, revenge didn’t bring anyone any happiness. It may have been a pretty common human response, but it didn’t really make anyone better. Now I have an idea of what I want to write about: the uselessness of revenge. I’m going to take that idea and create a working thesis: In “The Cask of Amontillado” and “The Tell-Tale Heart,” Edgar Allan Poe creates two situations where revenge takes time and planning, but it doesn’t seem to bring either one of the two murderers any real joy and satisfaction. In the space below, write your thesis question and response: Thesis Question: ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Working Thesis: ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Outline: The outline for your essay is much the same as the outline for any any essay: you need a hook, an introduction, a thesis, room to develop your body paragraphs, and a conclusion. I. Introduction: Find a creative way to introduce your essay. A. Hook: Use a line of dialogue from one of the stories that stands out with your thesis. Describe a vivid setting from one of the stories. Ask a provocative question. Share a universal idea that comes from the story. Use a meaningful quotation from one of the stories. ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ B. Background: You are going to need to provide enough information from the stories to guide your discussion, but you don’t want to just write plot summary. You can assume that your readers have read the stories. ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ C. Thesis: Now that you know what your intro is going to be, write your thesis as it will appear in your paper in the space below. ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ II. Body: Throughout the paper, you are going to need to have evidence from the stories to prove your point. Then, each piece of evidence needs your analysis to show its significance. In the spaces below, write the points, the evidence, and the analysis that you will use to develop your thesis. A. Point: ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Evidence: ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Analysis: ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ B. Point: ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Evidence: ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Analysis: ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ C. Point: ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Evidence: ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Analysis: ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ D. Point: ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Evidence: ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Analysis: ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ III. Conclusion: Your conclusion is your final point on the paper. You need to use it to point out to your audience how you have proven your thesis: A. Thesis Restatement: ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ B. Summary of Evidence: ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ C. Final Point: ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________