Social structure theories Societal forces Social structure theory Varying patterns of criminal behavior exist within the social structure. Biological and psychological approaches do no account for this. Social structure theories focus on these patterns Social structure theory is also concerned with social change and its effect on behavior Social structure Social structure is created by the distribution of wealth, power and prestige Social classes: segments of the population with similar portions of material goods, sharing attitudes, values, norms and lifestyle Poverty About 20% of the U.S. children’s population lives in poverty Problems Inadequate housing and health care Disrupted family life Unemployment Lowered motivation, despair Poverty (cont) Less likely to delay gratification Culture of poverty, passed from generation to generation, includes apathy, cynicism, helplessness, and mistrust of social institutions, especially schools, government, police Primary cause of crime: disadvantaged position Social structure Forces operating in poverty stricken areas push man of its members in the direction of criminal behavior Branches of social structure theory Social disorganization theory Strain theory Culture deviance theory Ecological, Social Disorganization Theory Ecology applied to cities Shaw and McKay: five city zones Business, “downtown” area, Zone I Transitional zones, Zone II Working class residential, Zone III White collar, Zone IV Suburbs, Zone V Social disorganization (cont) Shaw and McKay looked at court records, 1880s to 1930s Plotted the addresses of all those who went to court on large city maps Found that most arrestees lived in Zone II, the transitional zones Held true over time City areas Lake Michigan I II Downtown Transition IV III V Working class Suburbs White collar Steelmills mills Steel Characteristics of Zone II Located next to downtown or industrial areas Substandard, deteriorated housing Low levels of home ownership, rental Low income High rates of TB, infant mortality, mental illness Characteristics (cont) High unemployment High crime rates High levels of mobility, short and long term Turnover of ethnic groups Ethnic groups changed over time, but crime rates remained high Characteristics (cont) Successive waves of immigrants lived in these areas. First generation--law-abiding, but their children had a high likelihood of becoming delinquent Held true over time, regardless of ethnic group Conclusions These neighborhoods produced high levels of crime and delinquency Although specific ethnic groups were blamed at the time, crime was high regardless of the ethnic group or culture Immigration had shut down in 1924 because some claimed that immigrants brought crime with them Explanations (cont) Appeared, however, that these groups did not bring crime, but that their children were at risk because of living in these areas Shaw and McKay argued that these areas put adolescents at risk for becoming criminal because of community level social disorganization Explanations Such factors included: Poverty Alienation Fear of crime, suspicion of others Competition for limited jobs Households destabilized because of limited and uncertain employment, discouraged unemployed Explanations Thus, neighborhood structure influences criminal behavior Crime and delinquency arise as a response to adverse conditions in slum areas Community members do not mobilize and help each other because of fear Explanations Difficult to control children without neighborhood assistance, stressed parents have less influence Children grow up in the presence of adolescent gangs (which have existed for over 100 years) and adult criminals. They are exposed to criminal activities as an option and opportunity Crime prone areas Transitional zones Large number of single-parent families Owner to renter Economic base declining, few jobs Neighborhoods adjoining also experience an increase in crime Strain theory Began with Durkheim’s 19th century concept of anomie Durkheim argued that modern societies differed from those of the past Less group oriented, more individualistic More specialization of labor Less consensus over norms and values Durkheim (cont) Societies try to exert control over people In early societies, informal control is sufficient (approval, inclusion in the group) In modern societies, this is much less effective, and formal controls develop As consensus breaks down, more difficult to control people Durkheim (cont) Anomie refers to a condition of relative normlessness, and society can no longer exert control. Demands become unlimited. Without norms, people will feel alienated, not part of a larger society. Crime becomes common in such societies, symptomatic of the problem. Crime also serves a function. 20th Century strain theory Sociologists of the 20th century are influenced by Durkheim They argued that crime is symptomatic of a problem, of “strains” in a society, particularly where there is a lack of consensus Merton: crime in the U.S. is the result of strains in American society Merton and strain However, these strains must also serve a function (some functions of the political machine) Merton theorized that the “American Dream created strains for Americans, although it served an important function American: Americans have the goal of acquiring wealth, success, power, prestige Strain (cont) They are to acquire these things through hard work, education, thrift Everyone presumably has a chance at the American Dream: if you don’t succeed, it is your fault Merton thought that this idea of an equal chance is a myth--some are far more advantaged than others Strain (cont) Crime is a result of the frustration people experience over their inability to achieve social and financial success People respond in various ways to the pressure of the American Dream Modes of Adaptation Modes of Goals Adaptatio Conform + Means Crime + - Innovatio + - + Ritualism - + - Retreatis - - + + and - + Rebellion + and - Modes (continued) Conformity: balanced society, majority American Dream serves a function because many work hard and achieve, makes for a successful society Innovation: same goals, criminal means Ritualism: hard work, thrift, no expectation of success Retreatism: rejection--drug addicts, vagrants Modes (cont) Rebellion: want new goals and means, revolutionaries, cults, reformers Because society does not evenly distribute the means to attain goals, there will be highcrime areas Social conditions produce crime Does not explain: Why one chooses an adaptation Strain (cont) Does not explain: desistance, crime among the non-poor Strain: Cohen Cohen argued that when lower class boys are frustrated by the failure to achieve middle class success, they join gangs Poor children, upon entry to school, are judged against the standards of middle class teachers Middle class measuring rod Cohen (cont) Many poor children have lacked adequate preparation and stimulation for school. They are not used to scheduling, structured activities, and have little familiarity with books, letters and numbers, etc... They are found lacking by the teachers and become frustrated Cohen (cont) Might react in different ways to this frustration: corner boy, college boy, delinquent boy Implications: development of preschool programs such as Headstart Differential opportunity Conceptualized in terms of access to legitimate and illegitimate (criminal) opportunities If conventional opportunities were blocked, youths would turn to criminal opportunities For middle class youth, legitimate opportunities might be available Opportunity theory (cont) For middle class, criminal opportunities might not be readily available Some youths might have both available Some might have both legitimate and criminal opportunities “blocked” Even access to criminal options may be blocked Gangs Cloward and Ohlin argued that there are different types of gangs criminal gang: seek monetary gain through crime] Conflict gang: specialize in violence, occur in areas so disorganized that youths are denied access to both legitimate and criminal opportunities Gangs (cont) Retreatist: drug related. The persons in such gangs might not have either the skills or the opportunities to succeed in criminal or conflict gangs Overlap among gangs Opportunity theory led to the War on Poverty. Programs such as Job Corps still reflect their impact