Practice

advertisement

Estimating the Discount Rate

P.V. Viswanath

Based on Damodaran’s Corporate Finance

Inputs required to use the CAPM

 According to the CAPM, the required rate of return on an asset will be:

Required ROR = R f

+ b

(E(R m

) - R f

)

 The inputs required to estimate the required ROR are:

(a) the current risk-free rate

(b) the expected market risk premium (the premium expected for investing in risky assets over the riskless asset)

(c) the beta of the asset being analyzed.

P.V. Viswanath 2

The Riskfree Rate

For an investment to be riskfree, i.e., to have an actual return be equal to the expected return, there must be:

No default risk; this usually means a government-issued security; but, not all governments are default free.

No uncertainty about reinvestment rates.

In practice, therefore, the riskfree rate is the rate on a zero coupon government bond matching the time horizon of the cash flow being analyzed.

 Theoretically, this means using different riskfree rates for each cash flow - the 1 year zero coupon rate for the cash flow in year

1, the 2-year zero coupon rate for the cash flow in year 2 ...

Practically, if there is substantial uncertainty about expected cash flows, it is enough to use a single riskfree rate for all flows.

P.V. Viswanath 3

The Bottom Line on Riskfree Rates

Using a long term government rate (even on a coupon bond) as the riskfree rate on all of the cash flows in a long term analysis will yield a close approximation of the true value.

 For short term analysis, it is appropriate to use a short term government security rate as the riskfree rate.

If the analysis is being done in real terms (rather than nominal terms) use a real riskfree rate, which can be obtained in one of two ways –

 from an inflation-indexed government bond, if one exists set equal, approximately, to the long term real growth rate of the economy in which the valuation is being done.

P.V. Viswanath 4

Measurement of the risk premium

The risk premium is the premium that investors demand for investing in an average risk investment, relative to the riskfree rate.

As a general proposition, this premium should be

 greater than zero

 increase with the risk aversion of the investors in that market increase with the riskiness of the “average” risk investment

P.V. Viswanath 5

Estimating Risk Premiums in Practice

Survey investors on their desired risk premiums and use the average premium from these surveys.

Surveying in practice is difficult because there is no way to ensure that the numbers that participants provide are the ones they use in their own decision making.

Assume that the actual premium delivered over long time periods is equal to the expected premium

- i.e., use historical data

Estimate the implied premium in today’s asset prices.

P.V. Viswanath 6

The Historical Premium Approach

This is the default approach used by most to arrive at the premium to use in the model

In most cases, this approach does the following

 it defines a time period for the estimation (1926-Present, 1962-

Present....)

 it calculates average returns on a stock index during the period it calculates average returns on a riskless security over the period

 it calculates the difference between the two

 and uses it as a premium looking forward

The limitations of this approach are: it assumes that the risk aversion of investors has not changed in a systematic way across time. (The risk aversion may change from year to year, but it reverts back to historical averages) it assumes that the riskiness of the “risky” portfolio (stock index) has not changed in a systematic way across time.

P.V. Viswanath 7

Historical Average Premiums for the

United States

Historical period Stocks - T.Bills

1926-1999

Arith

9.41%

Geom

8.14%

1962-1999

1981-1999

Stocks - T.Bonds

Arith

7.64%

Geom

6.60%

7.07% 6.46% 5.96% 5.74%

13.24% 11.62% 16.08% 14.17%

P.V. Viswanath 8

What is the right historical premium?

 Go back as far as you can, so as to reduce the standard error of the estimate. The standard error is roughly equal to

Standard Error in Risk premium = Annual Standard deviation in

Stock prices / Square root of the number of years of historical data

With an annual standard deviation in stock prices of 24% and 25 years of data, for instance, the standard error would be

Standard Error of Estimate = 24%/ √25 = 4.8%

 Be consistent in your use of a riskfree rate -- if you use the

T.Bill(T.Bond) rate, use the spread over the T.Bill (T.Bond) rate.

Use arithmetic averages for one-year estimates of costs of equity and geometric averages for estimates of long term costs of equity.

P.V. Viswanath 9

Implied Equity Premiums

 If we use a basic discounted cash flow model, we can estimate the implied risk premium from the current level of stock prices.

For instance, if stock prices are determined by the simple Gordon

Growth Model:

Value = Expected Dividends next year/ (Required Returns on Stocks -

Expected Growth Rate)

Plugging in the current level of the index, the dividends on the index and expected growth rate will yield a “implied” expected return on stocks.

Subtracting out the riskfree rate will yield the implied premium.

P.V. Viswanath 10

Implied Equity Premiums

This is a market neutral approach to estimate the implied spread, i.e., it assumes that the current level of the market is correct)

For instance, if the S&P 500 is at 1100, expected dividends next year on the index is 33 and the expected growth in the earnings/dividends is 7%:

1100 = 33/(r - .07)

 Solving for r, we find r = 10%

If the treasury bond rate is 7%, the implied Equity Premium =

10% - 7% = 3%

 The problems with this approach are:

 the discounted cash flow model used to value the index has to be correct.

 the inputs on dividends and expected growth have to be correct it implicitly assumes that the market is currently correctly valued

P.V. Viswanath 11

In Summary...

 The historical risk premium is 6.6%, if we use a geometric risk premium, and much higher, if we use arithmetic averages.

The current implied risk premium is much lower. Even if we use liberal estimates of cashflows (dividends +stock buybacks) and high expected growth rates, the implied premium is about

4% and probably lower.

Implied risk premium using the S&P 500 Index value is ~1%!

 We will use a risk premium of 5.5%, because

The historical risk premium is much too high to use in a market, where equities are priced with with premiums of 4% or lower.

The implied premium might be too low, especially if we believe that markets can become overvalued.

P.V. Viswanath 12

Estimating Beta

The standard procedure for estimating betas is to regress stock returns (R j

) against market returns

(R m

) -

R j

= a + b R m

 where a is the intercept and b is the slope of the regression.

The slope of the regression corresponds to the beta of the stock, and measures the riskiness of the stock.

P.V. Viswanath 13

Estimating Performance

The intercept of the regression provides a simple measure of performance during the period of the regression, relative to the capital asset pricing model.

R j

R j

= R f

= R f

(1b j

= a j

+ b j

(R m

) + b

R m

+ b j

R m

- R f

)

........... Capital Asset Pricing Model

........... Regression Equation

If a j a a j j

> R f

= R

< R f f

(1b j

) ..Stock did better than expected during reg period

(1b j

) ..Stock did as well as expected during regr period

(1b j

) ..Stock did worse than expected during reg period

Jensen's alpha, a measure of stock performance, is measure as a j

- R f

(1b

)

P.V. Viswanath 14

Firm Specific and Market Risk

The R squared (R 2 ) of the regression provides an estimate of the proportion of the risk (variance) of a firm that can be attributed to market risk.

The balance (1 - R 2 ) can be attributed to firm specific risk.

P.V. Viswanath 15

Setting up for the Estimation

Decide on an estimation period

Services use periods ranging from 2 to 5 years for the regression

Longer estimation period provides more data, but firms change.

Shorter periods can be affected more easily by significant firm-specific event that occurred during the period

Decide on a return interval - daily, weekly, monthly

 Shorter intervals yield more observations, but suffer from more noise.

Noise is created by stocks not trading and biases all betas towards one.

Estimate returns (including dividends) on stock

Return = (Price

End

- Price

Beginning

+ Dividends

Period

Included dividends only in ex-dividend month

)/ Price

Beginning

 Choose a market index, and estimate returns (inclusive of dividends) on the index for each interval for the period.

P.V. Viswanath 16

Choosing the Parameters: Boeing

Period used: 5 years

Return Interval = Monthly

Market Index: S&P 500 Index.

For instance, to calculate returns on Boeing in May 1995,

Price for Boeing at end of April= $ 27.50

Price for Boeing at end of May = $ 29.44

Dividends during month = $0.125 (It was an ex-dividend month)

Return =($29.44 - $ 27.50 + $ 0.125)/$27.50= 7.50%

To estimate returns on the index in the same month

Index level (including dividends) at end of April = 514.7

Index level (including dividends) at end of May = 533.4

Dividends on the Index in May = 1.84

Return =(533.4-514.7+1.84)/ 514.7 = 3.99%

P.V. Viswanath 17

Boeing’s Historical Beta

Boeing versus S&P 500: 10/93-9/98

10.00%

5.00%

Returns on Boeing

-25.00% -20.00% -15.00% -10.00%

Beta is slope of this line

-5.00%

0.00%

0.00%

-5.00%

-10.00%

Regression line

5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00%

-15.00%

Each point represents a month of data.

-20.00%

Returns on S&P 500

P.V. Viswanath 18

The Regression Output

Returns

Boeing

= -0.09% + 0.96 Returns

R squared=29.57%

S & P 500

Intercept = -0.09%

Slope = 0.96

P.V. Viswanath 19

Analyzing Boeing’s Performance

Intercept = -0.09%

This is an intercept based on monthly returns. Thus, it has to be compared to a monthly riskfree rate.

Between 1993 and 1998,

Monthly Riskfree Rate = 0.4%

Riskfree Rate (1-Beta) = 0.4% (1-0.96) = .01%

The Comparison is then between

Intercept versus Riskfree Rate (1 - Beta)

-0.09% versus 0.4%(1-0.96)= 0.01%

 Jensen’s Alpha = -0.09% -(0.01%) = -0.10%

Boeing did 0.1% worse than expected, per month, between 1993 and

1998.

 Annualized, Boeing’s annual excess return = (1-.0001)

12 -1= -1.22%

P.V. Viswanath 20

Breaking down Boeing’s Risk

R Squared = 29.57%

This implies that

29.57% of the risk at Boeing comes from market sources

70.43%, therefore, comes from firm-specific sources

The firm-specific risk is diversifiable and will not be rewarded

P.V. Viswanath 21

Estimating Expected Returns:

December 31, 1998

 Boeing’s Beta = 0.96

Riskfree Rate = 5.00% (Long term Government

Bond rate)

Risk Premium = 5.50% (Approximate historical premium)

Expected Return = 5.00% + 0.96 (5.50%) = 10.31%

P.V. Viswanath 22

How managers use this expected return

Managers at Boeing

 need to make at least 10.31% as a return for their equity investors to break even.

 this is the hurdle rate for projects, when the investment is analyzed from an equity standpoint

 In other words, Boeing’s cost of equity is 10.31%.

What is the cost of not delivering this cost of equity?

P.V. Viswanath 23

Fundamental Determinants of Betas

 Type of Business : Firms in more cyclical businesses or that sell products that are more discretionary to their customers will have higher betas than firms that are in non-cyclical businesses or sell products that are necessities or staples.

 Operating Leverage : Firms with greater fixed costs (as a proportion of total costs) will have higher betas than firms will lower fixed costs (as a proportion of total costs)

Financial Leverage : Firms that borrow more (higher debt, relative to equity) will have higher equity betas than firms that borrow less.

P.V. Viswanath 24

Determinant 1: Product Type

Industry Effects : The beta value for a firm depends upon the sensitivity of the demand for its products and services and of its costs to macroeconomic factors that affect the overall market.

Cyclical companies have higher betas than non-cyclical firms

Firms which sell more discretionary products will have higher betas than firms that sell less discretionary products

P.V. Viswanath 25

Determinant 2: Operating Leverage

Effects

Operating leverage refers to the proportion of the total costs of the firm that are fixed.

Other things remaining equal, higher operating leverage results in greater earnings variability which in turn results in higher betas.

P.V. Viswanath 26

Measures of Operating Leverage

Fixed Costs Measure = Fixed Costs / Variable Costs

 This measures the relationship between fixed and variable costs. The higher the proportion, the higher the operating leverage.

EBIT Variability Measure = % Change in EBIT / % Change in

Revenues

This measures how quickly the earnings before interest and taxes changes as revenue changes. The higher this number, the greater the operating leverage.

P.V. Viswanath 27

A Look at The Home Depot’s

Operating Leverage

Year

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

Ave rage (87-96)

$ 1,454

$ 2,000

$ 2,759

$ 3,815

$ 5,137

$ 7,148

$ 9,239

$ 12,477

$ 15,470

$ 19,536

$ 24,156

Net Sales % Change in Sales EBIT

37.55%

37.95%

38.27%

34.65%

39.15%

29.25%

35.05%

23.99%

26.28%

23.65%

32.58%

$ 98

$ 127

$ 185

$ 265

$ 382

$ 549

$ 744

$ 1,039

$ 1,232

$ 1,534

$ 1,914

% Change in

EBIT

29.59%

45.67%

43.24%

44.15%

43.72%

35.52%

39.65%

18.58%

24.51%

24.77%

34.94%

P.V. Viswanath 28

Reading The Home Depot’s Operating

Leverage

Operating Leverage = % Change in EBIT/ %

Change in Sales

= 34.94%/ 32.58% = 1.07

This is similar to the operating leverage for other retail firms, which we computed to be 1.05. This would suggest that The Home Depot has a similar cost structure to its competitors.

P.V. Viswanath 29

A Test

Assume that you are comparing a European automobile manufacturing firm with a U.S. automobile firm. European firms are generally much more constrained in terms of laying off employees, if they get into financial trouble. What implications does this have for betas, if they are estimated relative to a common index?

 European firms will have much higher betas than U.S. firms

European firms will have similar betas to U.S. firms

European firms will have much lower betas than U.S. firms

P.V. Viswanath 30

Determinant 3: Financial Leverage

As firms borrow, they create fixed costs (interest payments) that make their earnings to equity investors more volatile.

This increased earnings volatility which increases the equity beta

P.V. Viswanath 31

Equity Betas and Leverage

The beta of equity alone can be written as a function of the unlevered beta and the debt-equity ratio b

L

= b u

(1+ ((1-t)D/E) where b

L b u

= Levered or Equity Beta

= Unlevered Beta t = Corporate marginal tax rate

D = Market Value of Debt

E = Market Value of Equity

The unlevered beta measures the riskiness of the business that a firm is in and is often called an asset beta .

P.V. Viswanath 32

Effects of leverage on betas: Boeing

The regression beta for Boeing is 0.96. This beta is a levered beta (because it is based on stock prices, which reflect leverage) and the leverage implicit in the beta estimate is the average market debt equity ratio during the period of the regression (1993 to 1998)

The average debt equity ratio during this period was

17.88%.

The unlevered beta for Boeing can then be estimated:(using a marginal tax rate of 35%)

= Current Beta / (1 + (1 - tax rate) (Average Debt/Equity))

= 0.96 / ( 1 + (1 - 0.35) (0.1788)) = 0.86

P.V. Viswanath 33

Boeing : Beta and Leverage

Debt to Debt/Equity Beta Effect

Capital Ratio of Leverage

0.00%

10.00%

0.00%

11.11%

0.86

0.92

0.00

0.06

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

25.00%

42.86%

66.67%

100.00%

150.00%

233.33%

400.00%

1.00

1.10

1.23

1.42

1.70

2.16

3.10

0.14

0.24

0.37

0.56

0.84

1.30

2.24

90.00% 900.00% 5.89

5.03

P.V. Viswanath 34

Betas are weighted Averages

The beta of a portfolio is always the market-value weighted average of the betas of the individual investments in that portfolio.

Thus,

 the beta of a mutual fund is the weighted average of the betas of the stocks and other investment in that portfolio

 the beta of a firm after a merger is the market-value weighted average of the betas of the companies involved in the merger.

P.V. Viswanath 35

The Boeing/McDonnell Douglas

Merger

Company Beta Debt Equity Firm Value

Boeing

36,418

0.95

$ 3,980 $ 32,438 $

McDonnell Douglas 0.90

$ 2,143 $ 12,555 $

14,698

P.V. Viswanath 36

Beta Estimation: Step 1

Calculate the unlevered betas for both firms

Boeing = 0.95/(1+0.65*(3980/32438)) = 0.88

McDonnell Douglas = 0.90/(1+0.65*(2143/12555))

= 0.81

Calculate the unlevered beta for the combined firm

Unlevered Beta for combined firm

= 0.88 (36,418/51,116) + 0.81 (14,698/51,116)

= 0.86

P.V. Viswanath 37

Beta Estimation: Step 2

Boeing ’ s acquisition of McDonnell Douglas was accomplished by issuing new stock in Boeing to cover the value of McDonnell Douglas

’ s equity of $12,555 million.

Debt

Debt

= McDonnell Douglas Old Debt + Boeing ’ s Old

= $3,980 + $2,143 = $6,123 million

Equity = Boeing ’ s Old Equity + New Equity used for

Acquisition

= $ 32,438 + $ 12,555 = $44,993 million

D/E Ratio = $ 6,123/44,993 = 13.61%

New Beta = 0.86 (1 + 0.65 (.1361)) = 0.94

P.V. Viswanath 38

Firm Betas versus divisional Betas

Firm Betas as weighted averages: The beta of a firm is the weighted average of the betas of its individual projects.

At a broader level of aggregation, the beta of a firm is the weighted average of the betas of its individual division.

P.V. Viswanath 39

Bottom-up versus Top-down Beta

The top-down beta for a firm comes from a regression

The bottom up beta can be estimated by doing the following:

Find out the businesses that a firm operates in

Find the unlevered betas of other firms in these businesses

Take a weighted (by sales or operating income) average of these unlevered betas

Lever up using the firm’s debt/equity ratio

The bottom up beta will give you a better estimate of the true beta when

 the standard error of the beta from the regression is high (and) the beta for a firm is very different from the average for the business the firm has reorganized or restructured itself substantially during the period of the regression when a firm is not traded

P.V. Viswanath 40

The Home Depot’s Comparable Firms

Compa ny Na me

Buil ding Materi als

Catal ina Ligh ting

Cont'l Material s Corp

Eagl e Hardware

Emco Li mite d

Fas tena l Co.

HomeBa se Inc.

Hughe s Sup ply

Lowe's Cos .

Waxma n In dustries

Wes tburn e In c.

Wol ohan Lum ber

Sum

Averag e

Beta Market Cap $ (Mil)

1.0 5

1

0.5 5

0.9 5

0.6 5

1.2 5

1.1

1

$13 6

$16

$32

$61 2

$18 7

$1,157

$22 7

$61 0

Deb t Due 1-Yr Ou t Lon g-Term Deb t

$1 $11 3

$7

$2

$6

$39

$16 $ -

$19

$7

$14 6

$11 9

$1

$11 6

$33 5

1.2

1.2 5

0.6 5

0.5 5

$12 ,554

$18

$60 7

$76

$16 ,232

$11 1

$6

$9

$2

$20 0

$1,046

$12 1

$34

$20

$2,076

0.9 3

P.V. Viswanath 41

Estimating The Home Depot’s

Bottom-up Beta

Average Beta of comparable firms = 0.93

 D/E ratio of comparable firms = (200+2076)/16,232 =

14.01%

Unlevered Beta for comparable firms = 0.93/(1+(1-

.35)(.1401))

= 0.86

 If the Home Depot’s D/E ratio is 20%, our bottom-up estimate of Home Depot’s beta is 0.86[1+(1-.35)(.2)] =

0.9718

P.V. Viswanath 42

Decomposing Boeing’s Beta

Segment

Commercial

Aircraft

ISDS

Firm

Revenues

$26,929

$18,125

Estimated

Value

$30,160

$12,688

$42,848 b unlevered

0.91

0.8

Weight

70.39%

29.61%

100.00%

Weighted b

0.6405

0.2369

0.88

Levered

Beta

1.06

0.93

1.01

 The values were estimated based upon the revenues in each business and the typical multiple of revenues that other firms in that business trade for.

 The unlevered betas for each business were estimated by looking at other publicly traded firms in each business, averaging across the betas estimated for these firms, and then unlevering the beta using the average debt to equity ratio for firms in that business.

Unlevered Beta = Average Beta / (1 + (1-tax rate) (Average D/E))

Using Boeing

’ s current market debt to equity ratio of 25%

Boeing ’ s Beta = = 0.88 (1+(1-.35)(.25)) = 1.014

P.V. Viswanath 43

From Cost of Equity to Cost of Capital

The cost of capital is a composite cost to the firm of raising financing to fund its projects.

In addition to equity, firms can raise capital from debt

P.V. Viswanath 44

Estimating the Cost of Debt

If the firm has bonds outstanding, and the bonds are traded, the yield to maturity on a long-term, straight (no special features) bond can be used as the interest rate.

 If the firm is rated, use the rating and a typical default spread on bonds with that rating to estimate the cost of debt.

If the firm is not rated,

 and it has recently borrowed long term from a bank, use the interest rate on the borrowing or

 estimate a synthetic rating for the company, and use the synthetic rating to arrive at a default spread and a cost of debt

 The cost of debt has to be estimated in the same currency as the cost of equity and the cash flows in the valuation.

P.V. Viswanath 45

Estimating Synthetic Ratings

 The rating for a firm can be estimated using the financial characteristics of the firm. In its simplest form, the rating can be estimated from the interest coverage ratio

Interest Coverage Ratio = EBIT / Interest Expenses

Consider InfoSoft, a firm with EBIT of $2000 million and interest expenses of $ 315 million

Interest Coverage Ratio = 2,000/315= 6.15

Based upon the relationship between interest coverage ratios and ratings, we would estimate a rating of A for the firm.

P.V. Viswanath 46

Interest Coverage Ratios, Ratings and

Default Spreads

Interest Coverage Ratio

> 12.5

9.50 - 12.50

7.50

9.50

6.00

7.50

4.50 – 6.00

3.50

4.50

3.00

3.50

2.50 – 3.00

2.00 - 2.50

1.50 – 2.00

1.25

1.50

0.80

1.25

0.50 – 0.80

< 0.65

Rating

BB

B+

B

B-

CCC

CC

C

AAA

AA

A+

A

A-

BBB

D

P.V. Viswanath

Default Spread

0.20%

0.50%

0.80%

1.00%

1.25%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%

3.25%

4.25%

5.00%

6.00%

7.50%

10.00%

47

Costs of Debt for Boeing, the Home

Depot and InfoSoft

Bond Rating

Rating is

Boeing Home Depot InfoSoft

AA A+

Actual Actual

Default Spread over treas. 0.50% 0.80%

A

Synthetic

1.00%

Market Interest Rate

Marginal tax rate

5.50%

35%

5.80%

35%

6.00%

42%

Cost of Debt 3.58% 3.77%

The treasury bond rate is 5%.

3.48%

P.V. Viswanath 48

Estimating Market Value Weights

Market Value of Equity should include the following

Market Value of Shares outstanding

Market Value of Warrants outstanding

Market Value of Conversion Option in Convertible Bonds

 Market Value of Debt is more difficult to estimate because few firms have only publicly traded debt. There are two solutions:

Assume book value of debt is equal to market value

Estimate the market value of debt from the book value; for Boeing, the book value of debt is $6,972 million, the interest expense on the debt is $

453 million, the average maturity of the debt is 13.76 years and the pre-tax cost of debt is 5.50%.

Estimated MV of Boeing Debt = 453







(1 





1

(1.055)

13.76

.055











6, 972

(1.055)

13.76

 $7, 631

P.V. Viswanath 49

Estimating Cost of Capital: Boeing

 Equity

Cost of Equity = 5% + 1.01 (5.5%) = 10.58%

Market Value of Equity = $32.60 Billion

Equity/(Debt+Equity ) =

Debt

82%

After-tax Cost of debt = 5.50% (1-.35) = 3.58%

Market Value of Debt = $ 8.2 Billion

Debt/(Debt +Equity) = 18%

 Cost of Capital = 10.58%(.80)+3.58%(.20) = 9.17%

P.V. Viswanath 50

Choosing a Hurdle Rate

Either the cost of equity or the cost of capital can be used as a hurdle rate, depending upon whether the returns measured are to equity investors or to all claimholders on the firm (capital)

If returns are measured to equity investors, the appropriate hurdle rate is the cost of equity.

If returns are measured to capital (or the firm), the appropriate hurdle rate is the cost of capital.

P.V. Viswanath 51

Back to First Principles

Invest in projects that yield a return greater than the minimum acceptable hurdle rate.

The hurdle rate should be higher for riskier projects and reflect the financing mix used - owners’ funds (equity) or borrowed money (debt)

Returns on projects should be measured based on cash flows generated and the timing of these cash flows; they should also consider both positive and negative side effects of these projects.

 Choose a financing mix that minimizes the hurdle rate and matches the assets being financed.

If there are not enough investments that earn the hurdle rate, return the cash to stockholders.

The form of returns - dividends and stock buybacks - will depend upon the stockholders’ characteristics.

P.V. Viswanath 52

Download