QUALITY ASSURANCE, QUALITY CONTROL AND GCP Tina Liden Mascher & Catherine Mai-Trang Pham PARTS OF THE TRAINING/PRESENTATION QA/Quality Assurance (RCO managers) GCP - In summary (RCO managers) GCP – In practice (registerhållare/registry Manager, QA) CONTENTS Why QA? Good and bad examples Background: GCP and definitions QA/QC QA system and parts Overall responsibilities Sponsor responsibilities CRA Monitoring and SDV (source data verification) Risk-based monitoring Computerized systems in clinical research (FDA) WHY? REGULATORY REQUIREMENT IN GCP Regulatory requirement: for organizations to manage and monitor their quality control and quality assurance systems and their control documents (SOPs and other quality documents), so as to provide high-quality products and services that fully satisfy customer needs and expectations for organizations who perform clinical trial studies, so as to protect the safety and integrity of patients WHY? THE NATIONAL QUALITY REGISTRIES - EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH WHY? PUBLICATIONS FROM REGISTRIES (DATA SHOULD BE VALID AND CHECKED) WHY? REGULATORY REQUIREMENT EXTRAPOLATED TO REGISTER CENTERS For Quality Registers: to manage and monitor the organization’s quality control and quality assurance systems and their control documents (SOPs and other quality documents) so as to provide high-quality systems and services (system and database development and maintenance, data extraction, etc) that fully satisfy register owners’/researchers’ needs and expectations For Studies using data from Quality Registers: to manage and monitor the organization’s quality control and quality assurance systems and their control documents (SOPs and other quality documents) so as to provide high-quality data and processes (informed consent, data standards, traceability, data transfer, etc.) that fully satisfy academic and commercial sponsors’/regulatory needs and expectations GOOD EXAMPLE - QUALITY CONTROL THE BEST POSSIBLE CARE FOR THE PATIENT Working procedures: Cataract Registry THE BEST POSSIBLE CARE FOR THE PATIENT Research and Development: Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry THE BEST POSSIBLE CARE FOR THE PATIENT Quality Improvements: Swedheart Registry THE BEST POSSIBLE CARE FOR THE PATIENT New drugs/devices, e.g. Hip arthroplasty registry Publication: BAD EXAMPLES: FDA (WARNING LETTERS) Deficiencies relating to “Quality Systems” are by far the most commonly observed during inspections (MHRA inspection deficiencies report year 2013) “Failure to maintain adequate and accurate case histories that record all observations and other data pertinent to the investigation on each individual administered the investigational drug or employed as a control in the investigation” is cited in 6 out of the 10 warning letters issued by US-FDA to clinical investigators in 2010 (FDA warning letters) At one investigator site, source documents were not available because the computer “crashed”. So in the absence of availability, adequacy of the records could not be evaluated. The investigator was warned for “failure to retain records required to be maintained for the required timeframe per regulations” (FDA warning letters) QUALITY MANAGEMENT QA System: defined as the organizational structure, responsibilities, processes, procedures and resources for implementing quality management Quality Management: QA+QC QA: focused on providing confidence that quality requirements are fulfilled QC: focused on fulfilling quality requirements Quality Management must be commensurate with the Company business objectives and business model. Top management commitment and active involvement are critical in order to ensure at all times the adequacy, suitability, effectiveness and efficiency of the quality systems. QUALITY MANAGEMENT - TWO LEVELS Organizational level: Quality system based on ISO 9001, ISO 13485 etc, to define: Organizational structure (management, tasks, responsibilities) Resources, trainings SOPs: Authorities submission, study planning, investigator assessment, etc Internal audits Host external audits/inspections Contact person for internal members and for external parties on regulatory issues QUALITY MANAGEMENT- TWO LEVELS Study/Project level: ICH GCP requires study processes/traceability/documentation at different stages: Such questions should be answered via process and documentation: Study design: Is the trial design appropriate? Can the trial answer the proposed research question or will the data be equivocal, e.g. adequate statistical power? … etc. Study performance: Is the trial performed according to approved protocol? Do patients give informed consent freely? QUALITY FOUR STEPS APPROACH Say what you do Do what you say Prove it Improve it QA FUNCTION QA Function: To manage Quality System (processes and documentation) + Quality Management (QA+QC) QA Function: for regulatory requirements as a minimum, and for add-in value to an organization QA FUNCTION - DAILY SUPPORT Increasing the value of the registry - Inspection - Audits - Long-term development and survival By daily collaboration = no surprises, internal/external Results can be seen in high score auditing and quality control BACKGROUND Good Clinical Practice (GCP) is a set of internationally recognized ethical and scientific quality requirements for designing, conducting, recording, and reporting Clinical Trials. Compliance with GCP provides assurance that the rights, safety and well-being of subjects are protected, while maintaining data quality throughout the study. The objective of this ICH GCP Guideline is to provide a unified standard for the EU, Japan, and the United States to facilitate the mutual acceptance of clinical data by the regulatory authorities in these jurisdictions. GUIDELINES The principles of GCP are defined in: ICH Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6 (Guidance for Industry E6 Good Clinical Practice: Consolidated Guidance) adopted within Europe in July 1996 adopted within Japan in March 1997 adopted within the US in May 1997 GCP - BACKGROUND ICH Harmonized Tripartite guidelines for GCP3 WHO guidelines for GCP for trials on pharmaceutical products Code of Federal Regulations Good Clinical Practice Guidelines, Parts 50, 54, 56, 312 and 314 GCP Good Clinical Practice [GCP] guidelines provide an international ethical and scientific quality standard for the design, conduct, performance, monitoring, auditing, recording, analysis and reporting of clinical trials that provides assurance that the data and reported results are credible and accurate, and that the rights, integrity, and confidentiality of the trial subjects are protected GCP - THE DESIGN A protocol is a document that describes the objective(s), design, methodology, statistical considerations and organization of a study. According to the principles of GCP, a clinical study should be scientifically sound, and described in a clear, detailed protocol. The principles of GCP also state that a study should be conducted in compliance with the protocol that has received the Independent Ethics Committee’s (IEC) approval/favorable opinion GCP - CONDUCT, PERFORMANCE Evidence-based medicine is fundamental in the treatment of disease. GCP requires studies to be conducted to ensure the safety of the clinical trial subjects as well as the integrity of the data, which will be used to support changes in evidence-based care and the regulatory approval of new medicines. Compliance GCP requires that trials be conducted in compliance with the approved protocol, including eligibility criteria, adverse event monitoring, treatment and modifications GCP - MONITORING The ICH GCP document defines monitoring as “the act of overseeing the progress of the clinical trial and ensuring that it is conducted, recorded, and reported in accordance with the protocol, standard operating procedures, GCP, and applicable regulatory requirements.” Risk Based Monitoring Approach Additional protection for human subjects is the use of a Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) or Data Safety Committee (DSC) to evaluate accumulating data in a clinical trial GCP - AUDITING Auditing is defined in the ICH CGP document as “the systematic and independent examination of trial-related activities and documents.” The audit is usually conducted at the conclusion of the trial. The sponsor may hire field auditors who document findings in a written report to the sponsor. Authorities inspectors also conduct independent study audits. Traditionally, the purpose of authorities inspections has been to verify data submitted in support of a marketing application. However, the authorities and the sponsor may conduct “for cause” or directed audits at any stage of the study, if there is reason to suspect a problem with trial conduct or data integrity. GCP - RECORDING “If it is not written down, it did not happen” It is the investigator who produces the source data collected in Case Report Forms (CRFs). In creating the source information, investigators must ensure that they document not only routine patient care information but also protocol-specific information. If there are discrepancies between the data and the source document, an explanation must be included. GCP - ANALYSIS AND REPORTING Analysis: E9 ICH Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials Reporting: E3 ICH Structure and Content of Clinical Study Report GCP - ESSENTIAL DOCUMENTS Essential documents : “documents that individually and collectively permit evaluation of the conduct of a trial and the quality of the data produced. These documents serve to demonstrate the compliance of the investigator, sponsor and monitor with the standards of GCP and with all applicable regulatory requirements.” Essential documents for clinical trials include: Investigator's brochure with updates Protocol with amendments Date-documented authorities/EPN approvals CVs of study investigators Normal/reference laboratory ranges Investigational agent documentation and accountability Quality plan Monitoring reports Signed informed consents Source documents Complete CRFs with documentation of corrections Serious Adverse Event notifications Safety reports and annual reports to authorities/ EPN OVERALL RESPONSIBILITIES DURING CLINICAL RESEARCH Regulatory authorities Ethics Sponsor Investigator GCP - SPONSOR RESPONSIBILITIES Selecting qualified investigators Providing investigators with the information they need to conduct an investigation properly Ensuring proper monitoring of the investigation Ensuring that review and approval are obtained from Ethical Committee (EPN) Ensuring that the investigation is conducted in accordance with the approved study plan Maintaining an effective regulatory documentation Ensuring that authorities, all participating investigators, and EPN are promptly informed of significant new adverse events GCP - INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITIES Ensuring that an investigation is conducted according to the signed investigator statement, the approved study protocol, and applicable regulations, e.g. radiation, etc Protecting the rights, safety, and welfare of subjects Controlling drugs/devices under investigation Obtaining informed consent from each human subject Promptly reporting significant new adverse events REGISTERS: WHY AND FOR WHAT? Why Safety and follow-up Method development Clinical research Health economics Patient outcome Risk factors, prevalence, incidence What Development of guidelines International and local comparisons in healthcare Industry follow-up of new drugs/devices Epidemiological studies Real world studies(medical effect and cost) Feasibility studies Randomized studies (phase II, III, IV) DIFFERENT TYPES OF STUDIES - DIFFERENT REGULATIONS Study Type Regulations/Laws FIM/Phase I Clinical Trials – MPA approvals GCP ICH 6 Phase II/Phase III Clinical Trials – MPA approvals GCP ICH E6 Low Interventional Clinical Trials – MPA approvals GCP ICH E6 Non-Interventional Studies – Non MPA approvals - Helsingforsdeklarationen (DoH) - Etikprövningslagen, PUL och övrig nationell, tillämplig lagstiftning - LIF Policy 2010:1; Rules for non-interventional studies and financial support for healthcare quality registries LIF Policy Ickeinterventionsstudier och LIFs Etiska Regelverk (LER) (rev Juni 2014) LIF Läkemedelsbranschens Etiska Regelverk - DIFFERENT TYPES OF STUDIES - DIFFERENT RISKS FOR PATIENTSDIFFERENT LEVELS/FOCUSES OF GCP Study Type Risks to Patients GCP level FIM/Phase I Clinical Trials – MPA approvals High Organization level: Quality system Study level: full study protocol, ”extensive ”monitoring, etc Phase II/Phase III Clinical Trials – MPA approvals Medium to High Organization level: Quality system Study level: full study protocol, ”extensive ”monitoring, etc Low Interventional Clinical Trials – MPA approvals Low Organization level: SOPs Study level: full study protocol, lower requirement for monitoring, etc Non-Interventional Studies – Non MPA approvals Low Study level: Abbreviated protocol, reports or publication GCP AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE DEFICIENCIES The most common deficiencies noted during Regulatory Authority inspections pertain to: •Inadequate medical records: should include information on disease/indication, legibility, concomitant diseases, patient included in study ID XXXX, written consent obtained, concomitant medication •Protocol non-adherence: inform CRA about all deviations, of problems following the protocol •Inadequate drug accountability: reconstitution, doses administrated, vials used per patient and dose and also concomitant medication •Improper consenting procedures: by Investigator, including copy of signed consent given to patient, signed and personally dated by the subject and by the person who conducted the informed consent discussion •Inadequate reporting of adverse events: Related or non-related, significant or non-significant events should be reported FDA WARNING LETTERS 2012 Number 1 Failure to ensure that the investigation was conducted according to the investigational plan, the signed agreement, applicable FDA regulations, and conditions of approval imposed by the IRB or FDA: (a) Failure to perform study visits at location specified in protocol (b) Failure to ensure that assessments were conducted by an individual qualified by credentials to do so (c) Failure to enroll subjects who met eligibility criteria (d) Failure to perform protocol required testing (e) Failure to perform protocol required testing within stipulated timeframes (f) Failure to comply with state regulations regarding the reporting of newly-identified HIV positive laboratory results to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) DEFINITIONS: QA, QC Quality control : steps taken during the generation of a product or service, to ensure product/service quality, to ensure that the trial meets protocol and procedural requirements and is reproducible. Quality assurance refers to a systematic process to determine whether the quality control system is working and effective. A company QA system is the interpretation of the laws and regulations. Quality assurance in clinical trials is implemented - by the sponsor : through independent auditing of quality control activities - by regulatory authorities : through inspection of quality control systems and activities QA ROLE • Purpose: Company interpretation of legal requirements • Goal: External - recognition Internal – quality through standardization Roles are functions, SECURE the business Anyone should be able to take over a role/function and apply the same standards BASIS OF QA SYSTEM External: • ICH • EC legislation and guidelines Internal: • Organogram • Job descriptions • Work descriptions QA/SOP SYSTEM-HIRARCHY Policies QA handbook SOPs Working instructions Templates WORK INSTRUCTIONS/SOP The organization’s interpretation of the guidelines and regulations Describes the most important, critical procedures Who is doing what, how and when QA AS A SUPPORT Ensure that procedures are followed and support inspections • GCP • GCLP • GMP • Working instructions/SOPs Continuous improvement comes from learning from each other and from previous experiences ... The result is increased efficacy QC - QUALITY CONTROL Checks performed by Operations themselves For example by a CRA performing monitoring INFORMED CONSENT Freely given informed consent should be obtained from every subject prior to clinical trial participation. Before informed consent may be obtained, the investigator or designee should provide the subject enough time and opportunity to inquire about details and to decide whether or not to participate in the trial. Prior to a subject’s participation in the trial, the informed consent form (ICF) should be signed and personally dated by the subject and by the person who conducted the informed consent discussion. A copy of the ICF should be provided to the subject. Before any trial procedure such as examinations/ evaluations and tests, it should be reconfirmed that the (ICF) has been obtained. ICF signature procedure must always be documented in the patients’ medical records. RESPONSIBILITIES OF INVESTIGATORS (1) The investigator should be qualified by education, training and experience to assume responsibility for the proper conduct of the trial, and should provide evidence of such qualifications through an up-to-date CV including GCP training/experience. The investigator should be aware of, and should comply with, GCP and the applicable regulatory requirements. http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E 6_R1/Step4/E6_R1__Guideline.pdf Declaration of Helsinki: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/ To conduct studies in full accordance with the current protocol. Trial provided materials such as check lists and flowcharts are useful tools to help with trial planning. To document and report any protocol deviations to the Company/Sponsor. RESPONSIBILITIES OF INVESTIGATORS (2) To report all AEs to Company. If a patient suffers an AE during an assessment, the assessor shall report this to the Principal Investigator and ensure that it is documented and reported. Report any SAEs within 24 hours of becoming aware of the event to Company and IEC/Ethics committee and Health Authorities as applicable . To read and understand the Investigator’s Brochure (including potential risks and side effects of the IMP). To ensure that all study personnel are informed about their obligations and study duties. To maintain properly completed and accurate study records and to make those records available for monitoring, audits and inspection. Permit trial-related monitoring, audits, IEC review, and regulatory inspection(s), providing direct access to source data/ documents. RESPONSIBILITIES OF INVESTIGATORS (3) The investigator should maintain a list of appropriately qualified persons to whom the investigator has delegated trial-related duties. The Principal Investigator is responsible for ensuring that all trial staff is adequately trained in trial processes and procedures, as well as the standardized working instructions used. Duties can be delegated, not responsibility. CRA should be always informed about all changes in study staff, study facilities and duties assignation as soon as they happen. For all equipment used by the site and departments, devices must be identified, calibrated and have documentation of controls. RESPONSIBILITIES OF INVESTIGATORS (4) All product accountability. Storage of the investigational product and ensuring that all equipment (infusion pumps, freezers, refrigerator) used in the trial is adequately calibrated and controlled. The investigator or designee should maintain records of: • the product’s delivery to the trial site • the inventory at the site • study medication administered to each subject • destruction of unused product • destruction of used study medication (vials) DATA COLLECTION (1) Clinical Trial data must be recorded, handled and stored to enable accurate reporting, interpretation and verification. All trial data must be recorded in the paper/electronic Case Report Forms (CRFs) in a timely manner, preferably as soon as they are generated. The investigator should ensure the accuracy, completeness, legibility, and timeliness of the data reported to the sponsor in the CRFs and in all required reports (as per Section 4.9.1 of ICH E6) Data reported on the CRF, that are derived from source documents, should be consistent with the source documents or the discrepancies should be explained (As per Section 4.9.2 of ICH E6 Source documents can be hospital records, lab reports, ECGs, MRIs, patient diaries, pharmacy records, etc. An explanation for the omission of any required data must be recorded on the appropriate page. Any data, CRF and information sheet collected should be signed and dated. Only the Principal Investigator or authorised Sub-investigator can sign the CRFs for assurance of the correctness and completeness of each page. DATA COLLECTION, CONT. (2) Any change or correction to a CRF should be dated, initialled and explained (if necessary) and previous/original entries should not be obscured. This will allow for the maintenance of an audit trail. Draw a single line through the incorrect entry, not erasing, blacking out or using correction fluid; Write the correct information next to the original entry; Initial and date. Subject confidentiality should be protected to the possible extent. Although all trial documents should be appropriately identified by subject number and/or date of birth (if applicable), reports sent to Company should make use of anonymised data. e.g. in some EU countries, MRI, CT scans and other source documents should not include direct and identifiable patient data such as name, full DOB (year allowed) and patient initials. DATA COLLECTION, CONT. (3) The investigator must arrange for the retention and storage of: -Patient identification codes (hospital/unit code, trial identification code and trial number) -Other source documents - patient files, clinic case notes and appropriate hospital records -Radiology or study specific data Radiology and Audiometric Data should be delivered to the Investigative Site for retention in the Subject Notes and/or Investigator Site File. If the Principal Investigator relocates or retires, Company must be notified (in writing). Trial documents and data including Site files should be retained for >15 years and, before destruction, Company must be informed by the Investigator. COMPANY/INDUSTRY Ensure that preset Sponsor requirements and authority regulations are fulfilled by internal and external teams Plan: audit plans, organograms, flow charts, roles and job descriptions Do: Inspection preparation and hosting Support operations: Advice and problem solving (Draft) Review and approve documents Training Audits Correct: findings Improve: SOPs and process Systematic approach with QA as a development team support. SPONSOR RESPONSIBILITIES DURING CLINICAL RESEARCH 5.18 Monitoring 5.18.1 Purpose The purposes of trial monitoring are to verify that: (a) The rights and well-being of human subjects are protected. (b) The reported trial data are accurate, complete, and verifiable from source documents. (c) The conduct of the trial is in compliance with the currently approved protocol/amendment(s), with GCP, and with the applicable regulatory requirement(s). 5.18.2 Selection and Qualifications of Monitors (a) Monitors should be appointed by the sponsor. (b) Monitors should be appropriately trained, and should have the scientific and/or clinical knowledge needed to monitor the trial adequately. A monitor’s qualifications should be documented. (c) Monitors should be thoroughly familiar with the investigational product(s), the protocol, written informed consent form and any other written information to be provided to subjects, the sponsor’s SOPs, GCP, and the applicable regulatory requirement(s). 5.18.3 Extent and Nature of Monitoring The sponsor should ensure that the trials are adequately monitored. The sponsor should determine the appropriate extent and nature of monitoring. 56 SPONSOR RESPONSIBILITIES, CONT. 2 5.18.4 Monitor’s Responsibilities. The monitor(s) in accordance with the sponsor’s requirements should ensure that the trial is conducted and documented properly by carrying out the following activities when relevant and necessary to the trial and the trial site: (a) Acting as the main line of communication between the sponsor and the investigator. (b) Verifying that the investigator has adequate qualifications and resources (see 4.1, 4.2, 5.6) and remain adequate throughout the trial period, that facilities, including laboratories, equipment, and staff, are adequate in order to safely and properly conduct the trial and remain adequate throughout the trial period. (c) Verifying, for the investigational product(s): (i) That storage times and conditions are acceptable, and that supplies are sufficient throughout the trial. (ii) That the investigational product(s) are supplied only to subjects who are eligible to receive it and at the protocol specified dose(s). (iii) That subjects are provided with necessary instruction on properly using, handling, storing, and returning the investigational product(s). (iv) That the receipt, use, and return of the investigational product(s) at the trial sites are controlled. (v) That the disposition of unused investigational product(s) at the trial sites complies with applicable regulatory requirement(s). (d) Verifying that the investigator follows the protocol and approved amendment(s). (e) Verifying that written informed consent was obtained. 57 SPONSOR RESPONSIBILITIES, CONT. 3 (f) Ensuring that the investigator receives the current Investigator’s Brochure, all documents, and all trial supplies needed to conduct the trial. (g) Ensuring that the investigator and the investigator’s trial staff are adequately informed. (h) Verifying that the investigator and the investigator’s trial staff have not delegated functions to unauthorized individuals. (i) Verifying that the investigator only enrolls eligible subjects. (j) Reporting the subject recruitment rate. (k) Verifying that source documents and other trial records are accurate and complete. (l) Verifying that the investigator provides all the required reports, notifications, applications on time. (m) Checking the accuracy and completeness of the CRF entries: (i) The data required by the protocol are reported accurately on CRFs and consistent (ii) Any dose and/or therapy modifications are well documented for each of subjects. (iii) Adverse events, concomitant medications and intercurrent illnesses are reported. (iv) Visits that the subjects fail to make, tests that are not conducted, and examinations that are not performed are clearly reported as such on the CRFs. (v) All withdrawals and dropouts of enrolled subjects from the trial are reported. 58 SPONSOR RESPONSIBILITIES, CONT. 4 (n) Informing the investigator of CRF entry error, omission, or illegibility. (o) Determining whether all adverse events (AEs) are appropriately reported within the time periods required by GCP (p) Determining whether the investigator is maintaining the essential documents (q) Communicating deviations from the protocol, SOPs, GCP, and the applicable regulatory requirements to the investigator and taking appropriate action designed to prevent recurrence of the detected deviations. SPONSOR RESPONSIBILITIES, CONT. 5 5.18.5 Monitoring Procedures: The monitor(s) should follow the sponsor’s established written SOPs as well as those procedures that are specified by the sponsor for monitoring a specific trial. 5.18.6 Monitoring Report 5.19 Audit 5.19.1 Purpose: The purpose of a sponsor’s audit, which is independent of and separate from routine monitoring or quality control functions, should be to evaluate trial conduct and compliance with the protocol, SOPs, GCP, and the applicable regulatory requirements if or when sponsors perform audits, as part of implementing quality assurance 5.19.2 Selection and Qualification of Auditors (a) The sponsor should appoint individuals, who are independent of the clinical trials/systems, to conduct audits. (b) Auditors should be qualified by training and experience. 5.19.3 Auditing Procedures (a) The sponsor should ensure that the auditing of clinical trials/systems is conducted in accordance with the sponsor’s written procedures on what to audit, how to audit, the frequency of audits, and the form and content of audit reports 5.20 Noncompliance 5.21 Premature Termination or Suspension of a Trial If a trial is prematurely terminated or suspended, the sponsor should promptly inform the investigators/institutions, and the regulatory authority(ies) 5.22 Clinical Trial/Study Reports 5.23 Multicenter Trials REG7IRB approvals protocol, responsibilities, communication between Inv. 60 SOURCE DATA VERIFICATION - DEFINITION GCP requires Source Data Verification [SDV] to be undertaken for all studies. SDV: All information in original records and certified copies of original records of clinical findings, observations, necessary for the reconstruction and evaluation of the trial. can be said to be the first place where information is recorded/captured The source documents are one of the “Essential documents” and serve to demonstrate quality of the data, as well as sponsor, investigator and monitor compliance with GCP and regulatory requirements SOURCE DOCUMENTS Original documents Data Hospital records Clinical and office charts Laboratory notes Memoranda Subjects’ diaries (medical records?) “Checklists” Pharmacy dispensing records Recordings Data from automated instruments, copies or transcriptions Certified as being accurate after verification Copies, microfiches, photographic negatives, microfilm, magnetic media, X-rays, subject files Records kept at the pharmacy Record at laboratories and at medico-technical departments involved in the clinical trial WHY? HOW? Why: To ensure that data is complete, accurate, valid, reliable and verifiable. SDV is also required to provide confidence in any data reported, for example in published manuscripts How: Source Data Verification [SDV] is an evaluation of the conformity of the data presented in case report forms [CRFs] with source data. Data reported is compared with the original records. Every item of data that appears in a CRF should be documented somewhere else to allow verification. SOURCE DATA VS DATA MONITORING Data monitoring = ensuring that the data have been correctly entered and that all corrections have been dated and initialed, while checking for error and inconsistencies. SDV= data checked against source documents CONFIDENTIALITY Maintain confidentiality of subjects’ identities. Maintain confidentiality of sponsors’ proprietary information. Patient’s informed consent should be obtained and documented prior to the study. FILING AND ARCHIVING Source data are retained at the study site. Trial documents as specified in the essential documents in study files Archived for a minimum of 15 years It is the responsibility of the sponsor to inform the investigator/institution as to when these documents are no longer needed KEY DATA 1) Primary efficacy data 2) Inclusion/exclusion criteria 3) Medical and medication history 4) Physical examination/vital signs 5) Visit dates 6) Adverse Events 7) Concomitant medication 8) Confirmation that the patient has entered a clinical study 9) (Date of) informed consent METHODS OF SDV Back to back method: the investigator holds all the source documents and answers questions Direct method: the monitor has direct access to source documents Signed Approval for review of source documents should be obtained to allow monitoring (Sweden: applies to each monitor). ****FDA must be able to make a copy of any records or reports made by the investigational team as part of the trial . FDA regulations state that the investigator is not required to divulge subject names unless a more detailed study of the records for a particular individual is required. STUDY PERFORMANCE AND EXTENT OF SDV According to SOP According to monitoring plans (SDV plans) Performed before data are retrieved from the site Performed in early stages of the clinical trial so that any problems elicited can be resolved 100% SDV for all patients, or 100% SDV of key data and a sample of the rest See also key areas on previous slide PRECAUTIONS High numbers of write-overs Poorly completed Serious adverse events Lack of/no adverse events when they should be expected Rapid recruitment Withdrawals SDV RECORDED 1. Which source documents were examined 2. Which CRFs were checked and why they were selected 3. The critical data items checked on each CRF 4. The non-critical data items checked on each CRF 5. The frequency of errors 6. The nature of errors 7. Whether any ameliorative action was undertaken at the site IMPORTANT! If, when and why changes were made, these changes should be signed off RESULT OF SDV The results of SDV should be critically evaluated to determine: Data accuracy Standard appropriate Reasons for inconsistencies Actions to be taken? Implications for not performing SDV: Data false? Rejection of data? EFFECTIVE SDV Discuss and agree upon SDV with the site/institution, encounter real life settings Assure SDV availability at contracting, prior to start of study visit SOPS, plans for SDV should be developed Consider the help of an onsite nurse/medical person first time Document which data have been verified Focus on key data Educate people on process and objectives Undertake SDV in peace and quiet, without interruption RISK-BASED MONITORING Includes identification, assessment, communication and ongoing review of trial risks and priorities, and control through mitigation of significant and serious risks. Factors that may affect collection and performance Risk management plan: Risk assessment. Risk control, risk review and reporting Identify critical data and processes (endpoints, SAE, consent, inclusion/exclusion) Monitoring plan should focus on risks (and systemic errors) Central and remote monitoring Well designed forms and completion instructions COMPUTERIZED SYSTEMS USED IN CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS (FDA) Applies to records in eletronic forms that are used to create, modify, maintain, archive, retrieve and transmit clinical data. Part 11: requires validation, audit trails, record retention, and record copying. The guideline is intended to assist in ensuring reliability, quality and integrity of electronic records. Study protocol should define when electronic records are used SOPs Source document: when data is entered directly into a remote computerized system, a copy of the data should be maintained at another location. Copies with data entry should be preserved (as PDF, XML or other) COMPUTERIZED SYSTEMS USED IN CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS (FDA) CONT. Internal Security: Limited access to authorized individual and individual account and password. Automatic log off could be considered. Audit trails keep track of all changes (who, when, what was changed) Date (time-stamped: year, month, day, hour) External Security: Procedures/controls in place to prevent altering, querying or reporting of data via external software instead of the protective system software. Data restricted to authorized staff. List of authorized staff. COMPUTERIZED SYSTEMS USED IN CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS (FDA) CONT. Other system features Direct entry of data, and consistent usage of terminology. Avoid data field to be automatically populated. Retrieving data: How source data were obtained and managed, electronic records used. System documentation: for each study, identify software/hardware used. System controls: Sufficient backups and recovery procedures. Records should be stored offsite. Change controls: changes to system should be documented Training of staff: should be documented LIST OF SOPS FOR COMPUTERIZED SYSTEMS User/regulatory requirements for system System set up/installation (including description and specific use of software) System operating manual Validation and functionality testing Data collection and handling (data archiving, audit trails, risk assessment) System maintenance (system decommissioning) System security measures Change control Data backups, recovery and contingency plans Alternative recording methods (system unavailability) Computer used training Roles and responsibilities Evaluate/assess key vendors SOME REFERENCES… 1. Khosla R. GCP guidelines: differences between the ICH and WHO guidelines. Good Clin Pract J 1998;3:24-30. 2. Verma D.D. , Sharma G., Arora H. ; GCP guidelines : FDA Vs WHO. Good Clin Pract J 1999;6:18-22. 3. ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice [E6: good clinical practice:consolidated guideline], 1997. 4. WHO guidelines for Good Clinical Practice for Trials on Pharmaceutical Products, 1994. 5. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Good Clinical Practice Guidelines Parts 50, 54, 56, 312 & 314, April 1999. 6. Bruckheimer M. FDA’s Inspections of Clinical Investigators. Drug Inf J 1993;27:213-6. 7. US Department of Health and Human Services, US Food and Drug Administration, 21 CFR Part 11, Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures: Final Rule, 1997. 8. Guidance for Industry . Computerized systems used in Clinical investigations, FDA May 2007 9.Guidance for Industry: Oversight of Clinical Investigations - A Risk-Based Approach to Monitoring” FDA. (August 2013), 10. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) issued the “Reflection Paper on Risk Based Quality Management in Clinical Trials” (November 2013) TACK! Tina Liden Mascher & Catherine Mai-Trang Pham +46 8-452 71 75 +46 76-526 90 71 +46 18 611 95 62 +46 72 241 12 8 kristina.lidenmascher@skl.se www.kvalitetsregister.se Nationella Kvalitets Register