Planning assumptions - HumanitarianResponse

advertisement
CP Background
– NDOC lead CP four pillars : Prevention ,
Humanitarian , Security and Mass casualty.
– Strong linkage between pillars,
– Humanitarian Pillar engaged with UWIANO,
MossP, NDOC, KRCS, and Crisis response Center.
– Based on referendum CP
– Planning workshop and field workshop in Eldoret
and Nakuru
– Steering Committee in place
OBJECTIVES
– Review, re-activate coordination mechanism and
principle of response
– Define level of preparedness and priority action
– Consult with field based partners
– Align with national structure and partners
– Advocate on key gaps
Main assumptions of the most likely scenario
1.
2.
localized episodes of inter-communal conflict and displacement will
continue in the run up to elections as a result of multiple factors:
– pre-existing tensions including over resources,
– disagreements on boundary decision, devolution and competition
for representation at county level, election campaigning. ..
– Areas likely at high risk of being affected include upper eastern,
north eastern, parts of coast, and rift valley.
Episodes of conflict surrounding elections period and election run off are
highly likely
• Compared to 2007/8: Less displacement in 2007/08 PEV hotpots, but new
hotspots areas and higher risk in the pre-election period
Most likely scenario
Preliminary planning
•
•
•
•
•
September 2012 to April 2013
Workshop in Nakuru and Eldoret
A percentage of the population and historical data
Includes temporary displacements.
No vulnerability definition and level of humanitarian
assistance defined.
• Further refinement will take place through field level
consultations
Proposed Hubs
Location
Coverage
FP
Priority
Nairobi (for
urban informal
settlements)
Kasarani, Westlands, Langata and
Makadra dsitrcits, Embakasi, (covering,
Kibera, Mathare, Kariabangi, Kariakor,
Korogocho, Kangemi)
Urban Forum
High
Eldoret
Eldoret: Eldoret East, Eldoret West,
Wareng, Trans Nzoia East, Trans Nzoia
West, Kwanza, Nandi North, Nandi
Central, Nandi East, Tinderet, Keiyo South
and Keiyo North.
IOM- OCHA
High
Nakuru
Nakuru: Nakuru Central, Nakuru North,
Rongai, Subukia, Naivasha, Gilgil, Molo,
Njoro, Kuresoi, Trans Mara East, Trans
Mara West, Baringo, Marigat North,
Kericho and Kipkelion
…
High
Garissa
Mandera, Wajir, Garissa, Ijara
UNICEF/OCHA
High
Mombasa
Mombasa informal settlements / Kilifi,
Kwale, Lamu, Taita Taveta
WFP
High
Isiolo / Marsabit
Isiolo, Marsabit, Moyale
WFP
High
Lodwar
All districts in Turkana county
OCHA
Medium
Role of the Hubs
• To provide support in coordination of additional response
capacity in the area of coverage to support Government
and KRCS response
• To provide support to coordination (this could be
generalized support or establishment of sub national
sectors depending on scale)
• To act as points of information collection, analysis and
dissemination and reporting. Information flow with Nairobi.
• Identification of locations where organizations could
position staff and resources
• N.B Hubs are intended to support and not replace district
coordination / response arrangements
SECTOR COORDINATION
Activation and planning role:
• NFI/Shelter : IOM
• Camp Coordination , Camp Management:
UNHCR
Download