Dr. Martin O. Eduvie Coordinator/Project Manager RWSSC National Water Resources Institute Kaduna. 1 Nigeria Water Resources Master Plan: IWRM In Nigeria, we have challenges Water shortage is more serious Need for water resources development hence the need for NWRMP 2013 due to the following: Water supply, irrigation and and energy generation problems Therefore, Water resources management is urgent and managed in accordance with IWRM JICA assisted the M/P 1995 and recommended review M/P 2013 2 Nigeria vision 20:2020 Millennium Development Goals The Africa Water Vision The National Water Resources Policy (revised 2009) Framework of M/P2013 Nigeria vision 20:2020 show the goals to improve current nation issues in water sector: Low rate of access to safe, clean water and sanitation facilities Less contribution of irrigation to National Food security and Insufficient utilization of hydropower (Renewable energy) 3 Need to review due to the following: Water demand is increasing with population growth and economic development River flow dry up Influence of climate change Effective water resources management at National level, catchment Management office CMO established 8HA 4 Formation of NNWRMP 2013 through review and up date of M/P 1995 Formation of Catchment Management Plan (CMP) HA-1 (Niger North)/Western HA-8 Phase 1- Basic study Phase 2 - Master plan for NNWRMP Phase 3- Formation of CMP for 2 hydrological areas 5 Improve current situation by setting of goals. 3 major areas of improvement Low rate of access safe and clean water and sanitation Low contribution of irrigation to national food security Insufficient utilization of hydropower for renewable unit Population 154.4 million in 2010 to 257.8 in 2050 6 Surface water – 81 projects (Dams) Groundwater development – 148 projects (Boreholes and wells) Water supply Projects – 489 (Water treatment) Sanitation project – 264 (Public investment) Irrigation and drainage – 146 project Water Resources Management 7 A systematic process for linking water and water-related policy, objectives, and uses to improve decision making in: ◦ operation and management of natural resources and environmental systems; ◦ design and implementation of programs and policies. A coordinating framework for integrating sectoral needs, water and waterrelated policy, resource allocation, and management within the context of social, economic, and environmental development objectives. 8 Schematic of the IWRM Process • Stakeholder Input • Donor Input • Other Input Country Development Objectives Key Water & Waterrelated Policies/Inst. Review & Evaluation Resources Assessment & Analysis Use Assessment & Analysis Resource Allocation Strategy Implementation & Monitoring Resource Development & Management Plan 9 10 What are the important sources of groundwater pollution in your country? 11 Aquifer Risk is a combination of aquifer vulnerability and pollution hazard . 12 Prevention is better than Cure! Suggest ways to reduce waste disposal to the streets and gutters What are the impacts of this waste on water? 13 Contamination sources not separate from water supply Lusaka How to supply potable water here? Source: Nkhuwa 2006 14 Private or public Organisation or individual concerned or responsible for a common interest (here: water management) User Provider of the resource Manager of the resource Impact of the resource on the ecosystem Regulator of the resource 15 Stakeholders want to participate: ◦ To protect their interests; ◦ To get problems fixed. Stakeholders need to participate: ◦ Government decisions hard to implement without social support; ◦ Some management tasks are more efficiently carries out by stakeholders; ◦ Small aquifers/surface require local management. 16 Informed decision-making using stakeholder experience; Conflict prevention by development of consensus and information sharing. social benefits - promote equity among users; economic benefits - optimize pumping and reduce energy costs; technical benefits - better estimates of water abstraction. 17 List stakeholders base on NWRMP Who are the key stakeholders ? Why is it necessary to pay attention to gender/other factors during stakeholder analysis? 18 Stakeholder analysis has three steps: 1. Identify the key stakeholders that could potentially affect or be affected by changes in surface and groundwater management. 2. Assess stakeholder interests and the potential impact of water resources management decisions on these interests. 3. Assess the influence and importance of the identified stakeholders. 19 A. High interest/ Importance, High Influence B. High Interest/ Importance, Low influence C. Low Interest/ Importance, High influence D. Low Interest/ Importance, Low influence 20 Level at which function performed. Functions Water User Association Collect water use charges Groundwater monitoring Make rules on water use Policing of groundwater use Participate in setting targets Settle W/R disputes Water Mgmt Agency National Authority 21 Inadequate attention given to government agencies as stakeholder. ◦ Functions spread across gvt. agencies; ◦ Objectives differ; ◦ Opportunity to influence other gvt. agencies. How can we get government agencies to work together? 22 Participation can take place at all levels from the top to governing bodies. A finely tuned balance of regulations and incentives is needed for stakeholder structures to function. 23 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Civil society-Consumers, NGOs, CBOs, Trade unions, Labour, media. Service providers-formal (public utilities) and informal (water vendors, farmers with water from private wells, AWDROP etc) Policy formulation and Coordinating bodiesNWC,GWP, NIWRMC Private sector- Banks-Micro financing, PPPs, and IFIs - WB, AFDB Regulatory bodies River Basins Authorities Trans boundary organisations External support agencies Legislators 24 S/N Stakeholders Examples Roles 1 Civil Society WASHCOMS, Water Users Association, NEWSAN, AUCPTRE, Climate Change Information Network, Water and Sanitation Media Network, Newspapers , TV, Radio Increase awareness . Mobilise public participation Awarenessraising, advocacy and building synergies for sustainable water financing 2 Service providers Water utilities, water vendors, Bottling companies, farmers, sewerage firms, AWDROP National IWRM policies and legislations determine the roles and responsibilities of the various levels of service provision In Nigeria, 25 3 Policy formulation and Coordinating bodies National Water Resources Council, National Integrated Water Resources Management Commission , National Sanitation Task Force, Policy formulation and C oordinating bodies Provide structures for coordination between different organisations Improved co-ordination Recommend creation of new departments or commissions /committees and authorities .An example is the new National Technical Sub Committee on IWRM 4 Local Governments LGA, LGDA etc Act as both service providers and regulators Providing information and supporting dialogue among stakeholders and policy makers Local governments use economic instruments to influence the behaviour of their citizenry. These include rate structures and charges, fees for permits as well as fines and penalties. They use regulatory instruments, such as by-laws, to influence the implementation of IWRM practices within their boundaries. 26 S/N Stakeholder Examples Roles 5 Private sector World Bank Urban Sector reform projects, AFDB in Osun, Yobe, Taraba, Oyo states Micro finance and community banks International Financial institutions such as the World Bank, AFDB provide loans to public sector service providers for the promotion of PPPs1st and 2nd National Urban Water sector reform programme The main types of private involvement (also known as privatisation and PPP) in water service provision are through: management and service contracts, leasing, BOTs, concessions, Joint ventures and Divestiture 6 River Basins Organisations 12 River Basins Dev. Authorities in in Nigeria The River basin organisations (RBOs )deal with the water resource management issues in a river basin, a lake basin, or across an important aquifer. Their functions vary from resource management and planning, to education of basin communities, Recent innovation has focused on an Integrated River Basin management approach (IRBM), 27 S/N Stakeholders Examples Roles 7 Regulatory bodies FMWAWR/ NIWRMC Functions are determined by National policy and legislation Allocation of water rights, Environmental management Economic regulation 8 Transboundary Organisations Lake Chad Commission, River Niger Basin Authority Trans-boundary organisations provide a framework for managing water resources across international boundaries 28 S/N Stakeholders Examples Roles 9 External support Agencies Global water partnership, European Union, Water Aid, JICA, DFID, UNDP, UNICEF, GEF Funding support to government and CSOs Implementation of model replicable projects Support for IWRM implementation, water sector reforms Capacity building 10 Legislators National Assembly, State Assemblies, Local Govt councillors Make laws 29 A. High interest/ Importance, High Influence B. High Interest/ Importance, Low influence C. Low Interest/ Importance, High influence D. Low Interest/ Importance, Low influence 30 Level at which function performed. Functions Water User Association Collect water use charges Groundwater monitoring Make rules on water use Policing of groundwater use Participate in setting targets S/GW Settle water disputes Water Mgmt Agency National Authority minor minor minor Minor minor 31 Inadequate attention given to government agencies as stakeholder. ◦ Functions spread across gvt. agencies; ◦ Objectives differ; ◦ Opportunity to influence other gvt. agencies. How can we get government agencies to work together? 32 Participation can take place at all levels from the tap to governing bodies. A finely tuned balance of regulations and incentives is needed for stakeholder structures to function. 33 Cap-Net, 2008 34 Government Stakeholders ZINWA Board 4 Catchment chairpersons ZINWA Catchment council Catchment manager Sub catchment council WUA WUA WUA 35 Are you clear why stakeholders are being mobilised – and the expected result? Often just a task to be done because it is in the work plan. Stakeholders need to be convinced of the benefit to them – many may see only disadvantages. Information, transparency, negotiation are all essential. 36 Mechanisms: ◦ Make complex situations understandable; information is a basis for discussion; ◦ Empower stakeholder organisations so that they have real responsibility; ◦ Ensure all stakeholders are represented; ◦ Where necessary, establish a sound groundwater rights system like the water well code 37 Water Policy GOVERNMENT Water Act Parliament Inter Ministerial Committee (IMC) Regulations Stakeholders RBC Water Info. & Planning Groundwater table Water Police Existing User Developer Case 1: Addressing Groundwater conflict Groundwater depletion ? 38 Water Policy GOVERNMENT Water Act Parliament Inter Ministerial Committee (IMC) Permit Regulations Water Police RBC Water Info. & Planning Stakeholders CASE 2: ADDRESSING WATER POLLUTION 39 Water Policy GOVERNMENT Water Act Parliament Inter Ministerial Committee (IMC) Permit Regulations Water Police RBC Water Info. & Planning Stakeholders CASE 3: ADDRESSING UPSTREAM-DOWNSTREAM CONFLICT 40 41 The HJKY Basin: NGURU HADEJIA JIGAWA STATE KANO STATE R.Hadejia R. K’ Hausa R.Yobe GASHUA Hadejia-Nguru Wetlands KATAGUM Hadejia Valley Irrigation Project YOBE STATE R.Kano R. Katagum KANO Challawa Gorge Dam DUTSE R. Jama’are Kano River Irrigation Project Tiga Dam Kafin Zaki Dam (proposed) BORNO STATE BAUCHI STATE 2 GOMBE STATE Promotion of IWRM in the HJKYB BAUCHI = Sites of proposed intervention at basin and wetlands level resp. JOS 42 NGURU GASHUA JIGAWA STATE HADEJIA Harbo & Hantsu wetlands KANO STATE Hadejia Valley Irrigation Project R.Hadejia R.Yobe GEIDAM YOBE STATE Hadejia-Nguru wetlands DAMATURU R. Katagum KANO Challawa Gorge Dam KATAGUM Dumus wetlands DUTSE Kano River Irrigation Project Tiga Dam Gantsa BORNO STATE BAUCHI STATE STATE R. Jama’are Kafin Zaki Dam (proposed) ands GOMBE STATE BAUCHI JOS 43 Basin (HJKYB) drains a catchment of approximately 84,000 km2 in northeast Nigeria (Figure 1). Located between latitude 9o 48 to 13o 30 north and longitude 7o 30 to 14o 30 East. Covering six states (Borno, Yobe, Jigawa, Bauchi Kano and Plateau). Over 15 million people are supported by the basin through agriculture, fishing, livestock keeping and water supply. 44 These wetlands support a wide range of ecological processes and economic activities which sustain (directly or indirectly) the livelihoods of over 7 million people. These activities include, agriculture, pastoralism, fishing, wild resources collection and tourism potential. The wetlands also host biodiversity of global significance. 45 Within the Hadejia river system, the natural pattern of runoff has been modified by the construction of large scale irrigation schemes and the associated dams. Most notably the Kano Irrigation Scheme (KRIP) Tiga Challawa dams and The Hadejia valley irrigation project (HVP). The Jama’are river is uncontrolled as plans to construct a dam at Kafin Zaki have been put on halt. 46 •Hydrological: •spatial and temporal variability •recurring and prolonged droughts •increasing desertification •Socio-economic: •high and rapid growing population •increasing urbanisation •increasing poverty •inefficient agricultural/irrigation practices •Environmental: •degraded water courses leading to flooding •water pollution & infestation of destructive aquatic weeds •excessive and uncontrolled groundwater exploitation •poor environmental sanitation and hygiene practices 47 •Institutional: •poor & fragmented watershed management (role definition) •inadequate coordination (horizontally/vertically) •policy inconsistency •inadequate stakeholder participation •insufficient hydro-meteorological information •Financial: •irrational pricing policies for raw/treated water •Lack of transparency and accountability •inadequate financing for watershed protection •inadequate financing for data management •Transboundary Waters: •Intra states river systems •downstream of Lake Chad •growing concern: LCBC, NNJC •Regional efforts weak 48 Resource Users Stakeholders in HJKYB Stakeholder Groups Resource User Groups: Traditional Councils Farmers groups Cattle Rearers Association Water Users Associations Fadama Users Associations Fishermen Associations 49 Resource Users Stakeholders in HJKYB Stakeholder Groups B. Government Agencies: Federal & State of: MWR, MARD, MEnv., MoH, MoE, MoInf., MoJust. RBDAs (2 nos) SWAs (5 nos) RWSSAs (5 nos) SEPAs (5 nos) ADPs (5 nos) LGAs (149 nos) NEMA NEAZDP 50 Resource Users Stakeholders in HJKYB Stakeholder Groups C. Legislative Houses NA Committees on: SA Committees on: WR, Env., Agric., Educ., Health WR, Env., Agric., Educ., Health LG Legislative Councils 51 Resource Users Stakeholders in HJKYB Stakeholder Groups D. CB & Research Institutions NWRI Universities (3 nos.) Polytechnics (5 nos.) LCRI IAR 52 Resource Users Stakeholders in HJKYB Stakeholder Groups F. Media Organisations Media Organisations Print Media Electronic Media (radio, t.v.) 53 Resource Users Stakeholders in HJKYB Stakeholder Groups E. NGOs & CBOs WaterAid, NCF, SCF Media Organisations 54 Resource Users Stakeholders in HJKYB Stakeholder Groups G. ESAs & Donor Sponsored Projects Media Organisations DFID, GEF, UNICEF, EU, WB, AfDB JWL, WANI, HNWCP, 55 Resource Users Stakeholders in HJKYB Stakeholder Groups H. Regional Organisations Media Organisations LCBC NNJC 56 Framework for Appropriate Institutional Arrangements Institutional requirements 1. Stakeholders involved in decision making; 2. Water resources management based on hydrological boundaries; 3. Organizational structures at basin and sub-basin levels to enable decision making at the lowest appropriate level; 4. Government to co-ordinate the national management of water resources across water use sectors. 57 Framework for Appropriate Institutional Arrangements (Cont’d) River Basin Organization The river basin is the logical bio-physical unit for the management of natural resources; A river basin organization (RBO) is the appropriate institution to translate IWRM concept into action; River basin organizations should be managed through interdisciplinary approaches; The entire drainage basin of a river should be taken into account in developing IWRM plans; The RBO should be responsible for coordinating development and allocation of water resources as well as regulating utilization according to the developed IWRM plans; Relationship between the river basin organization and political and administrative units should be recognized as RBO cannot work in isolation. 58 Achievement of effective participation and cooperation of all organisations and agencies at all levels and across sectors would be by: 1. anchoring the coordination at the highest apex level 2. creating coordination bodies at the river basin level 3. devolving responsibility to the lowest appropriate level 4. developing human and institutional capacity 59 Strategies for Transition to IWRM in HJKYB 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Development and Review of Policies, Legislations, etc. Reactivate, strengthen and support Coordinating Bodies Establish and Support State IWRM Committees Re-orient Existing Agencies towards IWRM Secure Political Commitment and Popular Support for IWRM Assess Availability, Demand and Uses of Water Resources Develop the HJKYB IWRM Plan 60 HJKYB Stakeholder Network HJKYB Trust Fund FMWR KYB TAC/CC Joint SIWRM Map of the HJKY Basin Secretariat NIGER REPUBLIC DIFFA Hadejia-Nguru Wetlands GASHUA NGURU KATSINA STATE JIGAWA HADEJIA RiverHadejia STATE KANO STATE Kano SIWRMC KANO Challawa Gorge Dam HJKYB-SCF JAC/JCC Borno MAIDUGURI SIWRMC R.Jama’are R.Komadugu River Jama’ar Kafin Zaki e Dam CDA Tiga Dam Yobe SIWRMC DAMATURU Irrigation Project R.Katagum KanoJigawa River Irrigation Project SIWRMC Lake Chad GEIDAM KYB WDI Barrage Hadejia KATAGUM R.Hadejia Hadejia Valley CDA DUTSE KADUNA STATE R.Yobe River YobeDAMASAK CDA YOBE STATE BORNO STATE (proposed) N 50km 0 10 20 30 40 50 PLATEAU STATE Plateau JOS SIWRMC BAUCHI STATE Bauchi BAUCHI SIWRMC GOMBE STATE ADAMAWA STATE CAMEROON REPUBLIC 61 Despite their importance to ecosystem, the maintenance of soil fertility, regional ground water recharge function, drought fall-back mechanism and their immense contributions to the national economy, the integrity of wetlands in the KYB is being undermined by Increasing threats. Poor water management, accentuated by uncoordinated development interventions, fragmented regulatory responsibilities, growing water demands, inequitable access to water resources and many more have been implicated. 62 The impacts of these threats have resulted into irregular flow of water in the wetlands. Irregular water flow in wetlands rivers (too much and too little) have led to siltation of channels and increased proliferation of typha grass leading to loss of farm lands, grazing lands, fish and fisheries and increased resources use conflicts and poverty among communities. 63 The proposed flow proportioning structure, discussed in this paper and for which the DFIDJWL project is catalysing the process through stakeholder dialogue and a feasibility study, will apportion water between the Marma, Burum Gana and the Old Hadejia river helping to regulate flow between these rivers. This will subsequently make provisions for the control of typha grass, liberate farmlands, grazing lands and improve fish catches. This will help to improve the local economy, reduce resource use conflicts and hence reduce poverty. 64 The process to be followed in arriving at the construction of the flow proportioning structure will also demonstrate how to construct similar structures in the basin and, in fact, in other basins across the country and elsewhere. The process will also demonstrate how to get various agencies (across tiers and sectors of government) to coordinate their activities. Lack of coordination of government agencies has often been a major impediment to the development progress in Nigeria today. 65 Hadejia-Nguru Federal Highway, Sept 05 4 Priority Issues & Options 66 Hadejia-Nguru Federal Highway, Sept 05 The Road to Daba Magani, Abandoned August 05 67 Gashua-Nguru-Hadejia-Kano Mass Transit, since August 04 The Road to Daba Magani, Abandoned August 05 68 Gashua-Nguru-Hadejia-Kano Mass Transit, since August 04 Cereal crop production on upland farms in the Banbori area, Sept 05 69 Cereal blockage Typha crop production of the Burumgana, on upland farms cleared in the March Banbori 05 area, Sept 05 70 Wetlands General Council members playing the River Basin Game IWRM Advocacy Planning State IWRM coordinators training in IWRM Action Planning Advocacy Training for State IWRM coordinators 71 NASS Ad-Hoc Committee on the HNWs, lead by Hon. Dr. Ahmed I. Lawan, Chairman House Committee on Agric, on their fact finding tour of the HNWs & KYB 3 Subsequent Developments 72 The river takes its source from the Kangimi in the Jos Plateau (210km) Crosses the city (North and South Area) River flows for 100km into Shiroro dam Flows for 200km and discharge finally to river Niger. 73 Serves as a source for: ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Drinking water Irrigation Industrial water supply Discharge of industrial waste water (created pollution from effluents 8-16kms on the river 74 Makera Zone (drain X) Textiles industries, Breweries, oil depot Kakuri Zone (drain Y) Textiles, Asbestos products, Fertilizers company, Defence industry Kachia Zone (drain C Romi) Refinery, Automobile Plant, Bottling companies, Tower Aluminium products Kudenda Zone (drain Z Rafin Dai) Brewery/Beverage industry, Food products, Flour mills, Glass factory, Batteries, Plastic products and farming. 75 Beecroft (1987) Oni (1990) reported COD 50 tons/day BOD 16tons/day Total Solid 50 tons/day Suspended solid 10 tons/day Toxic metals (Cu, Zn, Cr, Pb, Cd) 140 kg/day Flow 2000m3 /s – 8m3 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 Water supply Farmers (Irrigation, fishing & livestock) Industries (Water use, Effluent discharge) Government Agencies Upstream versus downstream 89 National example of stakeholders 90 The Bakolori irrigation scheme lies within semi-arid Northern Sudan Savannah zone. Established to cope with the problems of Aridity Rainfall variability Lack of food self-sufficiency Storage capacity of 450million m3 91 Extensive cultivation of 2-10km floodplain Local Farmers over 50,000 people Grow rice and sorghum (wet season) Vegetable crops (dry season) 92 93 Area of 8000 hectares 19km upstream from the dam. Storage capacity of 450million m3 Population of 13,000 people Dam is 5.5 km long earthfill structure with a 360m long and 48m high concrete central section. 35,000 hectares only 23,000 hectares developed. 94 Underdeveloped Northern Nigeria National needs and interest Farmers needs Foreign interests Downstream impact ◦ Before the dam was built 50,000 people made their living as floodplain farmers within 2-10kmbroad and 120km long floodplain downstream 95 Evaporation losses from reservoir Dam altered the pattern of the natural runoff of the Sokoto River. Dam partly closed and released Agriculture and fisheries affected 96 Resettle 2866 families (Kolawole 1991) Land expropriation was made with inadequate compensation. During 3 yrs of implementation of the irrigation scheme, farmers on site were not allowed to cultivate. 97 Demand compensation over loss of land, homes and economically valuable trees. Lacked democratic Institutions to articulate their interest. Peaceful demostration to rebellion Attempt to stop construction Anarchy and disruptive result 98 Compensation issues delayed due to ◦ What is right compensation ◦ Assessment of economic trees ◦ Identifying the rightful owners of the land • Finally deployed riot-police • April 1980 386 protesting farmers were killed. 99 Dialogue and Negotiation Compensation Local Communities more involved Management of Water resources Land allocation 10 0 Regional example of stakeholders 10 1 As a regional organization, LCBC has a mandate of conflict resolution Best practical regional experience on conflict resolution in Africa. Drawn up a Strategic Action Plan and launch a vision at the 2nd World Water Forum at the Haque in 2000.(Participartory) manner. 10 2 Basin constitute the largest fresh water resources in the Sahelian region of Africa Shared directly by Cameroon, Niger, Nigeria, Chad, Central African Republic population of 20,036,000 people. Within greater basin Sudan, Congo Brazaville and Libya The conventional basin approx. 967,000 km2 10 3 Fort Lamy Convention Lake Chad Basin Commission (LCBC) in 1964 (Nigeria, Niger, Chad and Cameroon) Lake Chad Research Institute Lake Chad basin Authority Launch the International Campaign to save Lake Chad Basin at 8th Summit of Heads of State and Government of LCBC at Abuja in March 1994. Interbasin transfer options study $6million 10 4 Poverty Food Information Stakeholder participation Population growth Urbanization Areas of conflicts 10 5 Allocating water resources (large irrigated areas and different ecosystems)eg Semry in Cameroon, Sodelac in Chad, Nigeria South Chad irrigation scheme. Formation of spirals of Degradation over-exploitation of halieutic stocks fishing and over exploitation of aquifers through indiscriminate use of motor pumps by farmers. Increased competition between production activities leading to conflicts. Stock breeders/farmers; fishermen/farmers. Threat to environment 10 6 Persistent drought, desertification and poor management of water resources. Aquifer depletion and low water table and deterioration of water quantity and quality. Drastic reduction in size and content 25,000 sqkm in 1964 to about 3,000sqkm by 2006. Decline in bio-diversity and increase vulnerability to erosion and poverty. Lack of integrated usage and management of water resources by member countries. Large dams upstream without due regards to ecosystems downstream and end users. 10 7 Inadequate system for monitoring the quantity and quality of water. Early warning system and preservation measures. Lack of active commitment by members Capacity of the basin to provide sustainable means of livelihood for 20 million people. Drought affected agricultural production. Use of chemicals for fishing 10 8 Prohibitive costs of operation and maintenance give rise to abandonment of large scale irrigation schemes. Increase pressure on the dwindling resources of the basin Increase potentials of conflicts. Farmers versus Pastoralists, member states etc Land and water degradation trends in the Lake Chad ecosystems. 10 9 11 0 11 1 Socio-economic problems + drought desertification results into conflicts. Grazers and arable farmers Intrar-state conflicts (Kano,Borono, Jigawa, Yobe, and Bauchi Reduce flows Change ecosystem 11 2 Severe drought and desertification a war broke out between Nigeria and Chad over emerging Islands in 1983. Extra- ordinary session of commission in July 1983 (Nigeria and Chad in Lagos) Two committees (Security and Survey and Demarcation) 11 3 Border demarcation exercise approved by Heads of States of the LCBC at their 6th Summit held in N’Djamena on 28th and 29th October 1987. Contributed equally the sum of 312,884,000 FCFA needed for the job. (Territories of Cameroon, Niger, Nigeria and Chad in Lake Chad). 11 4 Regular consultations Water and management laws and action plans Better application of the principles if IWRM by all stakeholders. Good education and public awareness on all issues concerning the management of the Basin. Research and studies. 11 5 The NWRMP has been designed to ensue that the N/P 1995 is reviewed and updated Provide reliable water services based on IWRP principles to achieve sufficiency, safety, sustainability, effectiveness and efficiency All stakeholders highly involved for a better water resources management and improved socio-economic development of Nigeria. 11 6 Thank you 11 7