PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Jan Skonieczny Introduction to Strategic Management Development phases of strategic management MAIN PROBLEM PATTERN OF SOLUTION Managing high skilled staff 1990 Matching to environment 1980 Strategic orientation 1970 Market demands 1960 Presence vs. future Cost orientation Quantity approach Source: [M. Moszkowicz, 2000, p. 27] 1955 1950 ? Strategic management Strategy / Strategic plans Marketing / Sales Controlling / Organizational planning Cost accounting / Economic Rationalization / Organization Evolution of strategic management Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 Strategic Management Attribute Boundary of environment Industrial (1900-1950s) •Around commercial activity of the organisation •Stable •Well-defined •Non-permeable •Few different types of actors Environment segmented into industries •Influences among actors laterally direct •Firm the center of power Common shares knowledge Post-Industrial (1950s- ) •Includes commercial sociopolitical activity •Changing •Value •Permeable to new influences •Many different types of actors •Industry lines indistinct •Direct and indirect influences •Centers of power in political bodies •Many foci of privileged knowledge Source: H. Ansoff, 1984 Strategic Management Dynamics of environment •Environmental change generated by the organisation •Few surprises Technology, markets, continuously evolving Occasional discontinuities Prior experience applicable to new situations •Change generated both inside organisation and outside environment by many sources •Many surprises Discontinuous changes frequent in market structure, technology, government relations. •Prior experience inapplicable to new situations Source: H. Ansoff, 1984 Characteristics of strategic management and operational management Definition of strategic management Strategic management is a total management concept, which in the face of a turbulent environment is able to creative adaptation. This concept defends negative outside trends and creates effective competitive advantages, which enable the realization of an enterprise's aims Source: [M. Moszkowicz, 2005] Levels and strategic areas at general models of strategy CORPORATE STRATEGY Financial STRATEGIC FUNCTIONAL AREA Problems: Detailing strategy for all strategic functional areas Marketing Problems: a)Choosing pattern of relation with environment b)Choosing activity area and configuration the strategic business units c)Separate resources for selected strategic business units R+D Top management Production STRATEGIC BUSINESS UNITS (SBU) (strategy – business strategy) Problems: How to win competition on SBU’s market area Source: [M. Moszkowicz 2005] other SBU C SBU A SBU B Criteria of selecting strategic business units Criteria of selecting strategic business units 1. SBU has its own clients 2. SBU has its own competitors 3. Decisions independence 4. Separated finance - can be calculated as centre of incomes dna costs 5. Sometimes Investment independence Source: [M. Moszkowicz, 2005] Three levels of strategy Corporate Strategy part 1 Strategy level Decisions covered Corporate · · · · · Purpose Direction Long-range goals Business definition Value creation for Customers Examples of application at Unilever To achieve sustainable, profitable growth and create long-term value for consumers, shareholders, employees Growth 5-6% annual growth Consumer goods · Brand-name, quality products that meet and anticipate everyday customer needs · · · · Three levels of strategy Business strategy part 2 Business (implementing corporate strategy) · Unit scope · Competitive approach · Markets served · Allocation of resources for value Foods, home and personal care divisions · Leverage brands for market leadership in high-demand product categories · Build relationships with consumers in Europe, Asia, the Americas, other markets · · Emphasise research and development to meet emerging consumer needs Three levels of strategy Functional strategy part 3 · Marketing (implementing business strategy, supporting corporate strategy) Product strategy · Pricing strategy · Channel/logistics (distribution) strategy · Integrated marketing communication (promotion) strategy · · Service Internal marketing Reinforce brand names in chosen categories (such as Magnum ice cream, Knorr soup) · Offer quality and value · Reach consumers through food wholesalers, retailers, restaurants, hotels · Build brands through media advertising, online presence and various other techniques · Fill channel orders completely, on time · Build commitment and cooperation for marketing through ongoing communication and meetings. Source: M. Wood, 2004 Information Need Categories for a Business or Business Unit Main differences between the resource-based view and the market orientation view part 1 Market orientation view (MOV) Resource-based view (RBV) Basic principle Adapt firm’s resources to the requirements of its competitive environment, i.e. to key success factors Pro-active quest for environments that allow the best exploitation of the firm’s resources Strategic analysis Centred on infustry structure and market attributes Emphasis on internal diagnosis Formulation process Outside-in Inside-out Source competitive edge Market positioning in relation to local competitive environment Firm’s idiosyncratic set of resources and competences Main differences between the resource-based view and the market orientation view part 2 Examples: Lipparini and Fratocchi (1999) Tetra Pak The Swedish company Tetra Pak develops, manufactures and markets complete packaging system for liquid and semi-liquid foods as well as equipment required for their distribution. The Tetra Pak architecture is derived form, and based on, relationships. The relational aspects that the company considered when it set up a production activity in a given country mainly concerned customer companies or governments. Even today, Tetra Pak seeks to become part of local culture, rapidly acquiring a network identity which is the direct result of its relational capability. Ikea Ikea, the world’s biggest home furniture manufacturer, is an example of how value can be created by renouncing a number of activities in the value chain and focusing on its own resources/competences and on relations with customers and suppliers. The Ikea formula comprises high quality design, a global sourcing system, products that the customers take home and assemble, and sales outlets that are also entertainment and service points. Main differences between the resource-based view and the market orientation view part 3 Market-orientation leads to location of production activities where the need for a given product arises, for example, the creation of a paper-processing facility in Brazil after verifying the demand for its packaging systems at potential customers, e.g. producers of liquid foods. Its customers in Brazil would like to be close to the Tetra Pak processing plant because the logistics function is a critical factor in continuity of supplies, given that the customers must necessarily use Tetra Pak material for their machines. IT links with its packaging material stocks enable Tetra Pak to predict the re-order point and adjust production of the nearest paperprocessing facility. cost savings generated by outsourcing activities like assembly and delivery allow the company to charge lower prices than its competitors. The company has approximately 2000 suppliers in over 50 countries, and 30 purchasing centres worldwide have the task of seeking out suppliers able to fit into its value system with good-quality, low-cost products. The final decision is taken by designers in Sweden, where Ikea’s operational HQ is located. Suitable computerized international coordination and support structures help suppliers source raw materials on the best terms. See also Figure 2.6 for an illustration of IKEA’s business system. Source: S. Hollensen, 2003, p. 39 The resouce-based view versus market Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 Product-Oriented Versus Market-Oriented Definitions of a Business Company Revelon Missouri-Pacific Railload Xerox International Minerals and Chemicals Standard Oil Columbia Pictures Encyclopedia Britannica Carrier Product-Oriented Definition We make cosmetics. We run a railroad. Market-Oriented Definition We make copying ecqupment We sell fertilizer. We help improve office productivity We sell gasoline. We make movies. We sell encyclopedias. We make air conditioners and furnaces. We supply energy. We market entertainment. We are in the informationproduction-and-distribution business. We provide a comfortable climate in the home. Source: P. Kotler, 1991 We sell hope. We are people-and-goods mover. We help improve agricultural productivity. The leading edge of strategy- fit or stretch Main elements of strategic management The Strategic Planning. Implementation, and Control Process The corporate Strategic-Planning Process The Business Strategic-Planning Process Organisation Mission & Objectives The vocabulary of strategy British Airways and the vocabulary of strategy Identity – Mix • Corporate Personality • Understanding the enterprise status, its aims, economical and social function. • Corporate Behavior • The most important enterprise dimension is estimated by its behavior. • Corporate Disign • • A Trade mark building shape and graphical form of documents. Corporate Communication • Flexible identity forming in short and medium periods Source: [M. Moszkowicz, 2005] Elements of organizational culture 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. System of organization essentials – needs, attitudes, preferences Organizational norms – legal or rules Style of management Myths Customs and behavior rituals – focused on clients Organizational language – verbal communication Source: [M. Moszkowicz, 2005] Enterprise communications IDENTITY TOŻSAMOŚĆ PERSONALITY OSOBOWOŚĆ FILOZOFIA Philosophy KULTURA Culture WIZJA MISJA statement Mission MIX IDENTITY IMAGE IMAGE REPUTATION WIZERUNEK REPUTACJA Reputation Source: [M. Moszkowicz, 2005] Definition of mission statement Mission statement is a synthesis – in an environment reality – a business concept M. Moszkowicz, 2005 Examples of mission statement 1. Democratize the computer – APPLE 2. Speed and cheap – McDonald’s 3. Comfortable attendance of clients - Mariott 4. Fulfill the customers’ needs of electricity and heat energy – energy sector firm 5. We supply heat energy to customers’ houses – energy sector firm Source: [M. Moszkowicz, 2005] Definition of Business along Three Dimensions; Full Function, Broad Scope, and Computer Manufacturer Utilizing Existing Technology Source: S. Abell Definition of Business along Three Dimensions; Full Function, Limited Customer Group, and Computer Manufacturer Utilizing Existing Technology Source: S. Abell Definition of Business along Three Dimensions; Full Function, Limited Customer, and Computer Manufacturer Utilizing Existing Technology Source: S. Abell Definition of Business along Three Dimensions; Limited Function, Broad Scope, and Peripheral Manufacturer Utilizing Existing Technology Source: D. Abell Definition of Business along Three Dimensions; Limited Function, Limited Customer Group, and Peripheral Manufacturer Utilizing Existing Technology Source: S. Abell Targed Definition of Business Financial objectives part 1 Focus of financial objective Purpose and examples External results To provide targets for outcomes of marketing activities such as: Increasing unit or monetary sales by geographic market Increasing unit or monetary sales by customer segment Increasing unit or monetary sales by product Increasing unit or monetary sales by channel Other objectives Source: M. Wood, 2004 Financial objectives part 2 Internal requirements To provide targets for managing marketing to meet organisational requirements such as: Achieving breakeven status Achieving profiability levels Achieving return on investment levels Other objectives Source: M. Wood, 2004 Marketing objectives Focus of marketing objective Purpose and examples External relationships To provide targets for managing relations with customers and other stakeholders such as: Enhancing brand, product, company image Building brand awareness and preference Stimulating product trial Acquiring new customers Retaining existing customers Increasing customer satisfaction Acquiring of defending market share Expanding or defending distribution Other relationship objectives Internal activities To provide targets for managing specific marketing activities such as: Increasing output or speed of new product development Improving product quality Streamlining order fulfilment Managing resources to enter new markets or segments Conducting marketing research Other objectives Source: M. Wood , 2004 Marketing In Practise: Proceter & Gamble • Proceter & Gamble’s Pampers brand has long battled its arch-rival Kimberly-Clark’s Huggies brand for a share of the US nappy market. In monetary terms, Huggies is the share leader, holding nearly 45 per cent of the US market. A few years ago, when Pamper’s market share was hovering under 35 per cent and overall market growth seemes limited, its marketers decided on more aggressive share objectives. At the time, Kimberly-Clark was reducing the number of nappies in each Huggies pack-age – and lowering prices slightly – to stimulate sales and profits. Pampers’ marketers cut pries but not the number of nappies per package and in pursuit of higher market share, began emphasising this adventage in splashy new promotions. They intensified the pressure even further by increasing the value of discount coupons and adding the word ‘Compare’ to Pampers packages. The plan worked: Pampers gained market share even as Huggies lost some ground. The following year, with financial objectives in mind, Pampers’ marketers followed Kimberly-Clark’s lead and reduced the number of nappies per package. Source: M. Wood, 2004 Societal objectives part 1 Forces of societal objective Purpose and examples Ecological protection To provide targets for managing marketing related to ecological protection and sustainability: Reducing pollution with natural or ‘greener’ products, ecologically friendly processes Doing business with ‘greener’ supplier’s and channel members Reducing waste by redesigning products and processes for recycling, other efficiencies Conserving use of natural resources Other objectives Source: M. Wood, 2004 Societal objectives part 2 Social responsibility and stakeholder relations To provide targets for managing marketing related to social responsibility and stakeholder relations: Building a positive image as a good corporate citizen Sopporting designated charities, community projects, human rights groups and other, with money and marketing Encouraging volunteering among employees, customers, suppliers, channel members Communicating with stakeholders to understand their concers and explain societal activities Other objectives Source: M. Wood, 2004 Business Mission Statements Humana, Inc. The mission of Humana is to achieve an unequaled level of measurable quality and productivity in the delivery of health services that are responsive to the needs and values of patients, physicians, employers, and employees. Our strategy is twofold: We insit upon excellence and productivity, and we are creating an integrated Source: H. Bartletthealth care system while exploring new services that address the needs and values of our customers. H.C. Barlett, 1988 General Electric Company General Electric has identified 15 major businesses that are leaders in their markets today and that represent GE’s best opportunities to remain a world leader in the 1900s. we have grouped these businesses into three circlescore, high technology, and services-and surrounded them with three support operations that are helping our 15 major businesses in their drive for continuing world leadership. Source: H. C. Bartlett, 1988 McDonald’s Corporation McDonald’s Corporation is the largest foodservice organization in the world. The Company, its franchisees and affiliates operate more then 7,200 McDonald’s restaurants, each serving a limited menu of high-quality moderately priced food. The restaurants are located in all 50 of the United States, the District of Columbia, and internationally in 30 other countries and territories. In its 28-year history, the Company has pioneered foodservice technology, marketing techniques, and operational systems that are now the standards of its industry. The McDonald’s motto of Q.S.C.&V. translates into Quality food product; efficient, friendly Service; and restaurants renowned for the Cleanliness and Value they provide. Q.S.C.&V…. McDonald’s promise to people around the world. Source: H.C. Bartlett, 1988 James River Corporation James River Corporation, headquartered on the banks of the James River in Richmond, Virginia. Is a major integrated manufacturer and converter of paper and paper-related products, including pulp, and a manufacturer of certain plastic products and coated film. Through its subsidiaries, the Company processes basic raw materials-wood, wood pulp, synthetic fibers and plastic resins-into finished products such as towel and tissue papers, disposable food and beverage service items and folding cartons, as well as a wide array of communication papers and specialty industrial and packaging papers. During its 17-year story history, the Company has pursued an acquisition and operating strategy which has significantly expanded its business and the diversity of its products. As of April 27, 1986, James River had 23,000 employees working in 75 manufacturing facilities located in 24 states, Canada, and the United Kingdom. With the subsequent acquisitions of Crown Zellerbach, Canada Cup and HandiKup, The Company today is made up of 36,00 employees in 111 manufacturing facilities in 28 states, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Source: H. C. Bartlett, 1988 Carson Pirie Scott & Company Through innovative management and highly motivated employees, we will achieve leadership in service and financial results. Emphasis will be placed on customer satisfaction in the retailing, food service, lodging, and distribution fields. Source: H.C. Bartlett, 1988 Strategies Objectives General Motors Corporation •Retain leadership in the worldwide automobile industry by producing high-quality, high-value products in the variety that customers demand. •Remain a significant force in related key industries •Continue as a high-technology enterprise sustaining a competitive edge into the 21st century. •Assure stockholders an attractive return as a basic of their continuing support of GM’s progress and objectives. Source: H.C. Bartlett, 1988 Carson Pirie Scott & Company •Achieve by 1988 a 16 percent return on equity, sales of $1.7 billion, and a strong balance sheet. •Achieve customer satisfaction by providing quality products and services at a fair price. •Provide our employees with a work environment that encourages their involvement and participation, and also is conducive to greater productivity. •To be a responsible member of the communities in which we do business. Source: H.C. Bartlett, 1988 Kemper Group •To provide insurance and financial services and products that are responsive to the needs of present and prospective customers and are competitive in price. •Over any five-year period, to achieve an increase in after-tax earnings greater then the average of our principal competitors, while at the same time increasing our share of market. •To invest assets at the highest net return consistent with maintaining financial resources sufficient to meet our obligations under all foreseeable circumstances. •To conduct all of your activities in an ethical, lawful and responsible manner. Source: H.C. Bartlett, 1988 Some guidelines for establishing strategic objectives in organizations. These are outlined below: 1. Strategic objectives should strongly correlate with and facilitate the attainment of business mission. 2. Strategic objectives should be compatible with the philosophy and culture of the business 3. Strategic objectives should be aggressive but attainable over a period of time. Objectives or goals that are either too high or too low will not motivate individuals. Ideally, strategic objectives should require work and imagination to attain them. 4. Strategic objectives should be determined through discussion and negotiation among individuals at various levels of the organization. 5. Strategic objectives should be understood by all members of the organization, especially those who have to lead that organization toward the attainment of those objectives. 6. Strategic objectives should become more specific as they are developed into operational objectives and goals at the operating levels of the organization. They should be measurable and quantifiable wherever possible. Target dates for attainment should be specified. 7. Strategic objectives should conform to ethical and social codes accepted by society and the business. Source: J. Pearce & R. Robinson Self-Actualization Needs (self-development and realization) A Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs Esteem Needs (self-esteem, recognition, status) Social Needs (sense of belonging love) Safety Needs (security, protection) Safety Needs (security, protection) Physiological Needs (hunger, thirst) Source: P. Kotler, 1991 External/ Environmental Analysis Functional analyze of enterprise MARKETING FUNCTION -Market share -Product concept -Set (combination) of product -Products quality -Price of product PERSONAL FUNCTION -Staff fluctuation -Staff recruitment -Motivation system FINACIAL FUNCTION -Net profits -Level of debts -Level of investment capitals PRODUCTION AND LOGISTIC FUNCTION -Production capacity -Limitations of production -Production costs -Automatisation INNOVATIVE FUNCTION -Type and scope of leading researches -Technology (modern or not modern) -Capacity for leading research MANAGMENT QUALITY CONTROL -Efficiency of strategic management -Efficiency of information system -Efficiency of cost analysis Source: [J. Skonieczny, 2005] Estimation the enterprise resources Estimation Criteria Proftability Credit ability Technical conditions of buildings Motivation systems Interpersonal relations Organizational structure Quality standards Source: [P. Kubiński, 2005] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Idea of core competencies Products STRATEGIC BUSINESS UNIT 1 STRATEGIC BUSINESS UNIT 2 Core competence 1 Source: [P. Kubiński, 2005] STRATEGIC BUSINESS UNIT 3 Core competence 2 STRATEGIC BUSINESS UNIT 4 From resources to core competitions Selected resources Contracts License Trade secrets Intellectual properties Trade marks Patents Competencies of competitive advantage Legal Data base Products fame (renown) Enterprise reputation Relations Configuration of value chain Distribution system Positional Know-how: Staff Suppliers Distributors Functional Attitude to: Quality Service Capacity for management of change Capacity for innovation Capacity for team work Source: [M. Moszkowicz, 2005] Elements and attributes of final product Cultural Selected methods of environment analysis Macroenvironment analysis •Experts opinion •Trends extrapolation •Scenarios •Simulation models •Brainstorm •Strategic gap analysis Source: [J. Skonieczny, A. Świda, 2005] Task (sector) environment •Five forces analysis •Pointing analysis of a sector •Strategic group map •Experience curve Scenario methods Scenario methods – Stimulate a firm’s management to forecast different events and their influences on an organization. Main four types of scenarios: 1) Scenarios of probable events – Creating a list of possible future events which could be important for an organization. 2) Simulation scenarios – Estimation of potential strategic choices and their future environment relations. 3) Scenarios of environment conditions – Estimation of a potential influence of separated environment elements on an enterprise and its probability to happen. 4) Scenarios of environment tendencies (processes) – Focused on most important tendencies which can strongly impact on an enterprise. Source: [A. Świda, 2005] Analyze of strategic gap Strategic gap analysis – Process of estimating existing strategy and organizing a business model for future environment requirements. That gap analysis creates ways to equal differences among organizational targets and expectations. Operational gap – Weak utilization (usage) of firm’s resources performance. Strategic gap analysis – Diagnostic methods which can estimate organizational adaptive skills to environment trends. Source: [M. Moszkowicz, 2005] Selected methods of environment analysis Macro environment analysis •Experts opinion •Trends extrapolation •Scenarios •Simulation models •Brainstorm •Strategic gap analysis Source: [J. Skonieczny, A. Świda, 2005] Task (sector) environment •Five forces analysis •Pointing analysis of a sector •Strategic group map •Experience curve Methods of Environmental Forecasting 1.Expert opinion 2.Trend extrapolation 3.Trend correlation 4.Dynamic modeling 5.Cross-impact analysis 6.Multiple scenarios 7.Demand/hazard forecasting Source: J. Bright&M. Schoeman. Environment analysis and stakeholders analysis Segmentation: • General environment segmentation Economy Society Demography FIRM Politics and legal area Technology • Analysis of strategic interest group STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS Source: [J. Skonieczny, 2005] Stakeholders groups at enterprise environment Groups that poses low Groups that poses influence on high influence on enterprise enterprise Groups strongly interested in enterprise Groups weakly interested in enterprise activities Source: [J. Skonieczny, 2005] Active spectators Gamblers (speculators) Mob Arbiters Methods of Environmental Forecasting 1. Expert opinion.Knowledgeable people are selected and asked to assign importance and probability ratings to various possible future developments. The most refined version, the Delphi method, puts experts through several rounds of event assessment, where the keep refining their assumptions and judgments. Source: S.C. Certo & J.P. Peter, 1988, s. 50 Methods of Environmental Forecasting 2. Trend extrapolation. Researchers fit best-fitting curves (linear, quadratic, or S-shaped growth curves) through past time series to serve as a basis for extrapolation. This method can be very unreliable in that new developments can completely alter the expected direction of movement. Source: Source: S.C. Certo & J.P. Peter, 1988, s. 50 Methods of Environmental Forecasting 3. Trend correlation. Researchers correlate various time series in the hope of identifying leading and lagging relationships that can be used for forecasting. Source: S.C. Certo & J.P. Peter, 1988, s. 50 Methods of Environmental Forecasting 4. Dynamic modeling. Researchers build sets of equations that attempt to describe the underlying system. The coefficients in the equations are fitted through statistical means. Econometric models of more than three hundred equations, for example, are used to forecast changes un the U.S. economy. Source: Source: S.C. Certo & J.P. Peter, 1988, s. 50 Methods of Environmental Forecasting 5.Cross-impact analysis. Researchers identify a set of key trends (those high in importance and/or probability). The question is then put: “If sent A occurs, what will be the impact on all other trends?” The results are then used to build sets of “domino chains,” with one event triggering others. Source: J. Bright&M. Schoeman. Methods of Environmental Forecasting 6.Multiple scenarios. Researchers build pictures of alternative futures, each internally consistent and with a certain probability of happening. The major purpose of the scenarios is to stimulate contingency planning. Source: J. Bright&M. Schoeman. Methods of Environmental Forecasting 7. Demand/hazard forecasting. Researchers identify major events that would greatly affect the firm. Each event is rated for its convergence with several major trends taking place in society and for its appeal to each major public group in the society. The higher the event’s convergence and appeal, the higher its probability of occurring. The highnest-scoring events are then researched further. Source: S.C. Certo & J.P. Peter, 1988, s. 50 Types of Competition and Expected Firm Performance Type of Competition Perfect competition Attributes Large number of firms Homogeneous product Low-cost entry and exit Examples Stock market Crude oil Expected Firm Performance Competitive Parity Source: J. Barney & W. Hesterly, 2006 Types of Competition and Expected Firm Performance Monopolistic Competition Large number of firms Heterogeneous products Low-cost entry and exit Toothpaste Shampoo Golf balls Automobiles Competitive Advantage Oligopoly Small number of firms Homogeneus products Costly entry and exit U.S steel and autos in the 1950s U.S. breakfast cereal Competitive Advantage Monopoly One firm Costly entry Home mail delivery Competitive Advantage Major trends of an environment 1. 2. Growth of the novelty of change. They important events which affect the organisation is progressively disconnected from past experience. We have discussed this phenomenon in detail in the preceding pages; Growth in the intensity of the environment. The maintenance of linkages between the organisation and its correspondents consumes a growing percentage of energy, resources, and managerial attention. We shall devote the following chapter to analysis of strategic intensity; Source: H. Ansoff, 1984 Major trends of an environment 3. 4. Increase in the speed of environmental change; Growing complexity of the environment. Source: H. Ansoff, 1984 Components of Environmental Analysis Source: D. Aaker Defining the 'public' Source: M. Wood, 2004 Different degrees of product newness Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 Some important variables in the international Societal environment Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 Some important variables in the international Societal environment The planning gap Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 The Strategic-Planning Gap External Analysis Opportunities Threats Enter new markets or segments? Add to product line? Diversity into related products? Add complementary products? Vertical integration? Ability to move to better strategic group? Complacency among rival firms? Faster market growth? Other? Likely entry of new competitors? Rising sales of substitute products? Slower market growth? Adverse government policies? Growing competitive pressures? Vulnerability to recession and business cycle? Growing bargaining power of customers or suppliers? Changing buyer needs and tastes? Adverse demographic chages? Other? Source: S. Certo & J. Peter, 1988 Strategic Groups in the Major Appliance Industry Components of Environmental Analysis Internal/ Ressources Analysis Types of Competition and Expected Firm Performance Type of Competition Perfect competition Attributes Large number of firms Homogeneous product Low-cost entry and exit Examples Stock market Crude oil Expected Firm Performance Competitive Parity Source: J. Barney & W. Hesterly, 2006 Types of Competition and Expected Firm Performance Monopolistic Competition Large number of firms Heterogeneous products Low-cost entry and exit Toothpaste Shampoo Golf balls Automobiles Competitive Advantage Oligopoly Small number of firms Homogeneous products Costly entry and exit One firm Costly entry U.S steel and autos in the 1950s U.S. breakfast cereal Competitive Advantage Home mail delivery Competitive Advantage Monopoly A simplified version of the value chain Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 BCG's Growth-Share Matrix Source: S. Certo, J. Peter, 1988 Cash generation in the BCG matrix Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 Compiling the GE matrix and making conclusions based on it. Step 2 Estimate position SBUs in the GE matrix Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 Compiling the GE matrix and making conclusions based on it. Step 3 Strategic implications of SBU positions Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 Core Competencies for the Example of Honca Roots are underlying skills and capabilities that represent core competencies Source:J. Mohr, S. Sengupta, S. Slater, 2005 Experience curves in different functions picture A Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 Experience curves in different functions picture B Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 GE's Multifactor Portfolio Matrix Source: S. Certo, J. Peter, 1988 Gillette's international market country portfolio Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 Marketing Planning, principles into practice Source: M. Wood, 2004 Model for development of core competences Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 Push and pull strategies in the car industry value chain Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 The business system of Ikea Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 The Product Life Cycle, Innovation, and the Role of Alliances Source: J. Mohr, S. Sengupta, S. Slater, 2005 Timing and Impact of Management Attention and Influence Source: R. Burgelman, M. Maidique, S. Wheelwright, 1995 Vickers Map of Competencies Source: R. Burgelman, M. Maidique, S. Wheelwright, 1995 Core Competencies at Canon part 1 Precision mechanics Fine optics Microelectronics Basic camera Compact fashion camera Electronic camera EOS autofocus camera Video still camera Source: G. Hammel, C.K. Prahalad, 1999 Core Competencies at Canon part 2 Laser beam printer Color video printer Bubble jet printer Basic fax Laser fax Calculator Plain paper copier Source: G. Hammel, C.K. Prahalad, 1999 Core Competencies at Canon part 3 Battery PPC Color copier Laser copier Color laser copier Navi Still video system Source: G. Hammel, C.K. Prahalad, 1999 Core Competencies at Canon part 4 Laser imager Cell analyzer Mask aligners Stepper sligners Excimer laser aligners Source: G. Hammel, C.K. Prahalad, 1999 Internal Analysis Strengths Weaknesses A distinctive competence? Adequate financial resources? Good competitive skills? Well thought of by buyers? An acknowledged market leader? Well-conceived functional area strategies? Access to economies of scale? Insulated (at least somewhat) form strong competitive pressures? Proprietary technology? Cost advantages? Competitive advantages? Product innovation abilities? Proven management? Other? No clear strategic direction? A deteriorating competitive position? Obsolete facilities? Subpar profitability because…? Lack of managerial depth and talent? Missing any key skills or competences? Poor track record in implementing strategy? Plagued with internal operating problems? Vulnerable to competitive pressures? Falling behind in R&D? Too narrow a product line? Weak market image? Competitive disadvantages? Below-average marketing skills? Unable to finance needed changes in strategy? Other? Source: S. Certo & J. Peter, 1988 Identifing key competences at DaimlerBenz The case of Daimler-Benz provides a good example of the management of technological competences. This internal process takes two to three months, and involves the group’s senior management. External consultants corroborate the internal analysis and futher develop the opinions gathered from the business units. The process is summarized in the nine main phases shown in Tabale 2. Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 Stages in identification of key competences at Daimler-Benz 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Products, clients and markets Key factor of success (KFS) Future market trends and the evolution of KFS Indentification of areas of key competences Initial formulation of key competences Mult-kriteria checking Fine-tirning and honing of these critical competences Needs analysis in terms of the key competences Study of competences other than key competences that should be retained Source: S. Hollensen, 2003, p.51 Compiling the GE matrix and making conclusions based on it Step 1: Determining the factors (only shown for hydraulic pumps) Step 2: Estimate position of SBUs inthe GE matrix Step 3: Strategic Implication of SBU positions The SBU only, e.g . Score/value Hydraulic pumps Market 0.80 attractiveness 1.00 Weight x Rating (1-5) Overall market size Annua market growth rate Historical profit margin 0.20 4 0.20 0.15 5 4 0.60 Competitive intensity 0.15 2 Technological requirements 0.15 4 Inflationary vulnerability 0.05 0.30 0.60 3 0.15 Energy requirements 0.05 2 Environmental impact 0.05 3 Total 1.00 0.10 0.15 3.70 = Weight Business strenght Market share Share growth Product quality Brand reputation Distribution network Promotional effectiveness Productive capacity Productive efficiency Unit costs Material supplies R&D performance Managerial personnel Total 0.10 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.15 0. 05 0.10 0.05 1.00 x Rating 4 2 4 5 4 3 3 2 3 5 3 4 = Score/value 0.40 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.45 0.25 0.30 0.20 3.40 SOURCE: S. Hollensen, 2003 Market Attractiveness CompetitivePosition Portfolio Classification and Strategies Market Attractiveness CompetitivePosition Portfolio Classification and Strategies Factors contributing to market attractiveness and competitive position Attractiveness of your market Market factors Size (value, units or both) Size of key segments Growth rate per year: -total -segments Diversity of market Sensitivity to price, service features and external factors Cyclically Seasonality Bargaining power of upstream suppliers Bargaining power of downstream suppliers Competitive position of your business (business strengths) Your share (in equivalent terms) Your share of key segments Your annual growth rate: -total -segments Diversity of your participation Your influence on the market Lags or leads Bargaining power of your suppliers Bargaining power of your customers Competition Types of competitor Degree of concentration Changes in type and mix Entries to and exits from market segment Changes in share Substitution by new technology Degrees and types of integration Where you fit, how you compare in terms of product, marketing capability Service, production strength, financial strength, management Segments you have entered or left Your relative share change Your vulnerability to new technology Your own level of integration Financial and economic factors Contribution margins Leveraging factors, such as economies of scale and experience Barriers to entry or exit (both financial and non financial) Capacity utilization Your margins Your scale and experience Barriers to your entry or exit (both financial and non financial) Your capacity utilization Technological factors Maturity and volatility Complexity Differentiation Patent and copyrights Manufacturing process technology required Socio-political factors in your environment Social attitudes and trends Law and government agency regulations Influence with pressure groups and government representatives Human factors, such as unionization and community acceptance Your ability to cope with change How strong your skills are Types of your technological skills Your patent protection Your manufacturing technology Your company’s responsiveness ad flexibility Your company’s ability to cope Your company’s aggressiveness Your company’s relationships Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 The Value Chan and Competitive Advantage Source: M. Porter, 2006 The Value Chan and Competitive Advantage Source: M. Porter, 2006 The Boston Consulting Group's Growth-Share Matrix Business PositionIndustry Attractiveness Matrix The BreakEven Time Metric Basic Conditions Supply Demand Raw materials Technology Unionization Product durability Value weight Business attitudes Public policies Price elasticity Substitutes Rate of growth Cyclical and seasonal character Purchase method Marketing type Industry structure Model of Organisation Analysis Number of sellers Product differentiation Entry and mobility barriers Exit and shrinkage barriers Cost structures Vertical integration Global reach Conduct Pricing behavior Product strategy and advertising Research and innovation Plant investment Legal tactics Performance Production and allocative efficiency Progress Full employment Equity Source: F. M. Scherer, 1980 The Value Chain SWOT Analysis Important Considerations for SWOT Analysis Internal Analysis Strengths Weaknesses A distinctive competence? Adequate financial resources? Good competitive skills? Well thought of by buyers? An acknowledged market leader? Well-conceived functional area strategies? Access to economies of scale? Insulated (at least somewhat) form strong competitive pressures? Proprietary technology? Cost advantages? Competitive advantages? Product innovation abilities? Proven management? Other? No clear strategic direction? A deteriorating competitive position? Obsolete facilities? Subpar profitability because…? Lack of managerial depth and talent? Missing any key skills or competences? Poor track record in implementing strategy? Plagued with internal operating problems? Vulnerable to competitive pressures? Falling behind in R&D? Too narrow a product line? Weak market image? Competitive disadventages? Below-average marketing skills? Unable to finance needed changes in strategy? Other? Source: S. Certo & J. Peter, 1988 External Analysis Opportunities Threats Enter new markets or segments? Add to product line? Diversity into related products? Add complementary products? Vertical integration? Ability to move to better strategic group? Complacency among rival firms? Faster market growth? Other? Likely entry of new competitors? Rising sales of substitute products? Slower market growth? Adverse government policies? Growing competitive pressures? Vulnerability to recession and business cycle? Growing bargaining power of customers or suppliers? Changing buyer needs and tastes? Adverse demographic changes? Other? Source: S. Certo & J. Peter, 1988 The Business Strategic-Planning Process Oportunity Matrix Threat Matrix Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis Generic Strategies Characteristics of costs strategy Cost strategy • Classical enterprise strategy. • Success factor - low cost (price). • The strategy needs absorptive market. • Typical requirements – big scale of production standard products, specialized technology. • Doesn't ”work” in ”saturated” market . Source: [M. Moszkowicz, 2005] Characteristics of differentiation strategy Differentiation strategy • Totally opposite to cost strategy. • In general - to achieve features which differentiate products form others. • Typical factors of differentiation color, shape, trade mark, distributions. • The strategy ”works” at saturated markets. • The differentiation features should be highly-estimated by clients. Source: [M. Moszkowicz, 2005] Strategies of SBU level. Model created by H.G. Steinmann and G. Schreyoegg 7 5 8 Costs 3 4 Main direction of competition 6 Change 2 1 Differentiation Competition rules Adaptation Market segment Source: [H.G. Steinmann, G. Schreyoegg, 2001] Competition area Whole market Strategies of SBU level. Model created by M. Moszkowicz (Moszkowicz cube) 4 3 2 7 6 8 1 Towards client 5 Market orientation Towards needs Production Market Coordination the adaptable activities 1 – cost strategy 2 – strategy of technological niche 3 – strategy of computer integrated manufacturing 4 – product diversification strategy Source: [M. Moszkowicz, 2005] 5 – mass marketing strategy 6 – strategy of market niche 7 – products differentiation strategy 8 – strategy of focused marketing Corporate strategy – model of M. Moszkowicz 7 5 8 External 3 4 Type of development 6 Passive 2 1 Internal Active One market Source: [M. Moszkowicz, 2005] Relation to uncertainty Area of activity Many markets 1. Penetration strategy 5. Monopolization strategy 2. Internationalization strategy 6. Diversification strategy 3. Integration strategy 7. Acquisition strategy 4. Enterprising strategy 8. Globalization strategy Ways Firms Can Differentiate Their Products To differentiate their products, firms can focus directly on the attributes of it products or services , or 1. Product features 2. Product complexity 3. Timing of product introduction 4. Location on relationships between itself and its customers, or 5. Product customization 6. Consumer marketing 7. Product reputation on linkages within or between firms 8. Linkages among functions within a firm 9. Linkages with other firms 10. Product mix 11. Distribution channels 12. Service and support Source: J. Barney & W. Hesterly, 2006 Creating the Mix of Product Process Development Projects Source: R. Burgelman, M. Maidique, S. Wheelwright, 1995 Generic strategies Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 Market definition Source: M. Wood, 2004 The Ansoff product-market strategy Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 The Microsoft-Lego alliance Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 The Nine Strategies to entry a Global Market Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 The three levels of a product Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 Major motives for starting export Pro-active motives Reactive motives Profit and growth goals Managerial urge Technology competence/unique product Foreign market opportunities/market information Economies of scale Tax benefits Competitive pressures Domestic market: small and saturated Overproduction/excess capacity Unsolicited foreign orders Extended sales of seasonal products Proximity to international customers/psychological distance Source: S. Hollensen, 2003 Risks of the Generic Strategies RISKS OF COST LEADERSHIP RISKS OF DIFFERENTIATION RISKS OF FOCUS Cost leadership is not sustained competitors imitate technology changes other bases for cost leadership erode Differentiation is not sustained competitors imitate bases for differentiation become less important to buyers The focus strategy is imitated The target segment becomes structurally unattractive structure erodes demand disappears Proximity in differentiation is lost Cost proximity is lost Broadly-targeted competitors overwhelm the segment the segment’s differences from other segments narrow the advantages of a broad line increase Cost focusers achieve even lower cost in segments Differentiation focusers achieve even greater differentiation in segments New focusers subsegment the industry Source: M. Porter, Product and Process Technology and the Generic Strategies COST LEADERSHIP DIFFERENTIATION COST FOCUS DIFFERENTIATION FOCUS Product Technological Change Product development to reduce product cost by lowering material content, facilitating ease of manufacture, simplify logistical requirements, etc. Illustrative Technology Product development to enhance product quality, features, deliverability, or switching costs Technological Policies Product development to design in only enough performance for the target segment’s needs Product design to meet the needs of a particular segment better than broadlytargeted competitors Process Technological Change Learning curve process improvement to reduce material usage or lower labor input Process development to support high tolerances, greater quality control, more reliable scheduling, faster response time to orders, and other dimensions that raise buyer value Process development to tune the value chain to a segment’s needs in order to lower the cost of serving the segement Process development to tune the value chain to a segment needs in order to raise buyer value Process development to enhance econoMies of scale Source: M. Porter Model of organization developement Understanding strategy development Strategic direction from prior decisions Specific Strategies for Business and Conditions Under Which Each Might Be Applicable Size of organization Large PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PHASE 5 PHASE 6 Evolution stages Crisis of IDENTITY Revolution stages Crisis of RED TAPE 6: Growth through INTEGRATION 5: Growth through COLLABORATION The six phases of growth Crisis of AUTONOMY Crisis of CONTROL 4: Growth through COORDINATION 3: Growth through DELEGATION Crisis of LIDERSHIP 2: Growth through DIRECTION Small 1: Growth through CREATIVITY Young Age of organization Source: L. E. Greiner, 1972, adapted by J. Skonieczny, 1999 Mature Organization practices during evolution in the five phases of growth Three Intensive Growth StrategiesAnsoff's Product or Market Expansion Grid Performance Importance Matrix Successive Sets Involved in Customer Decision Making Major Classes of Growth Opportunities Intensive Growth Integrative Growth Diversification Growth Market penetration Backward integration Market development Forward integration Product development Horizontal integration Source: P. Kotler, 1991 Concentric diversification Horizontal diversification Conglomerate diversification Comparison of Strategic Profiles of Texas Instruments and Hewlett-Packard TEXAS INSTRUMENTS BUSINESS Competitive advantage in STRATEGY large standard markets based on long-run low cost position MARKETING High volume/low price Rapid growth MANUFACTURING Experience curve cost-driven Vertical integration R&D Design to cost FINANCIAL HUMAN RESOURCES Aggressive Full utilization Competitive Individual incentives Source: P. Kotler, 1991 HEWLETT-PACKARD Competitive advantage in selected, small markets based on unique, high-value products High value/ high price Controlled growth Delivery and quality Limited vertical integration Features and quality Design to performance Conservative No debt Cooperative Companywide incentives Strategy Implementation Strategy implementation - Definition Strategy implementation – finding the resources which, when used properly (accurate to circumstances) result in obtaining strategic target by an organization. J.M. Lehner Source: [P. Kubiński, 2005] Patterns of strategy implementation Staff effort in strategy formulating and implementing Big Small Self-made pattern Cultural pattern Collaboration pattern Reorganizational pattern Directive pattern Big Source: [P. Kubiński, 2005] Top management efforts in strategy formulating and implementing Small Sequence of strategy building and implementing Strategic aims and targets. Activity programs at functional areas, supply, production, technology, marketing, distribution finance, organizations. Dimensions and measures of achievements. People responsible for coordination and realization. Budgets and realization requirements (material and non material investments) Control system of program realization Source: [Obłój, 1998, p. 79] Types of strategies and adequate structures – according to Chandler Strategy Organizational structure One product Functional/ centralized Diversification Departments/ decentralized Mixed diversification Holding/strongly decentralized Source: [P. Kubiński, 2005] Marketing plan direction Source: M. Wood, 2004 Ways Firms Can Differentiate Their Products To differentiate their products, firms can focus directly on the attributes of it products or services , or 1. Product features 2. Product complexity 3. Timing of product introduction 4. Location on relationships between itself and its customers, or 5. Product customization 6. Consumer marketing 7. Product reputation on linkages within or between firms 8. Linkages among functions within a firm 9. Linkages with other firms 10. Product mix 11. Distribution channels 12. Service and support Source: J. Barney & W. Hesterly, 2006, p. 147 Organising to Implement Product Differentiation Strategies Organizational Structure: 1. Cross-divisional/cross-functional product development teams 2. Complex matrix structures 3. Isolated pockets of intense creative efforts: Skunk works Management Control Systems: 1.Broad decision-making guidelines 2. Managerial freedom within guidelines 3. A policy of experimentation Compensation Policies 1. Rewards for risk-talking, not punishment for failures 2. Rewards for creative flair 3. Multidimensional performance measurement Source: J. Barney & W. Hesterly, 2006, p. 164 The Organizational Requirements for Implementing Cost Leadership and Product Differentiation Strategies Cost leadership Product differentiation Organizational structure 1.Few layers in the reporting structure 2. Simple reporting relationships 3. Small corporate staff 4. Focus on narrow range of business functions Organizational structure 1. Cross-divisional,cross-functional product development teams 2. Willingness to explore new structures to exploit new opportunities 3. Isolated pockets of intense creative efforts Source: J. Barney & W. Hesterly, 2006, p. 169 The Organisational Requirements for Implementing Cost Leadership and Product Differentiation Strategies Management control systems 1. Tight cost-control systems 2. Quantitative cost goals 3. Close supervision of labor, raw material, inventory, and other costs 4. A cost leadership philosophy Management control systems 1. Broad decision-making guidelines 2. Managerial freedom within guidelines 3. Policy of experimentation Compensation policies 1. Reward for cost reduction 2. Incentives for all employees to be involved in cost reduction Compensation policies 1. Rewards for risk-taking, not punishment for failures 2. Rewards for creative flair 3. Multidimensional performance measurement Source: J. Barney & W. Hesterly, 2006, p. 169 The balanced Scorecard pprovides a framework to translate a sstrategy into Operational Terms Entrepreneutrial Stucture Functional Structure Divisional Structure Strategic Business Unit Structure Matrix Structure Intrapreneutrial Unit with Division Structure The Strategic Planning. Implementation, and Control Process McKinsey 7-S Framework Relationship between Marketing and Strategic Planning