Understanding Risks of Fraud and Abuse in Research September 16, 2011 Judy Mudgett Nathan Cooke Overview Background on Fraud/Abuse Fraud/Abuse by Phase of Research Real Examples of Fraud Available Resources Why Important? Why Important? Why Important? Fraud and Abuse Defined Fraud- deceit, trickery, suppression of the truth or breach of confidence, perpetrated for profit or to gain some unfair or dishonest advantage. Abuse- Corrupt, wrong or improper use of authority, capabilities and/or resources. Fraud Triangle (Donald Cressey) FRAUD PRESSURES – Personal Indicators Financial – – – – – Living beyond means Greed Poor Credit Financial Losses Health Expenses Vices – Gambling – Drugs, alcohol Work-related Pressures – Under appreciated – Job Dissatisfaction – Underpaid Other – Challenge – Family/peer pressure Common Rationalizations Employer owes Borrowing, will pay it back Nobody will get hurt Using money for a good purpose Just to get over “this” hump Everyone rationalizes – Judge self by their intentions – Judge others by their actions Fraud Opportunity Work is assigned and carried out in a way that would allow one person to divert funds without any high expectation of being caught Fraud condition impacted most by internal controls Strongest defense against fraud Internal Controls Control Weakness (ACFE 2010 Report to the Nations) Lack of Internal Controls Override of Existing Internal Controls Lack of Management Review Poor Tone at the Top Lack of Compentent Personnel in Oversight Roles Lack of Independent Checks/Audits Lack of Employee Fraud Education Lack of Clear Lines of Authority Lack of reporting Mechanism 0.0% 5.0% 10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0% Research Risk Areas Conflict of Interest/ Commitment Procurement & P-cards Travel Reimbursements Payroll and/or Effort Reporting Subcontracts Falsifying Research Data/Results Pre-Award Undisclosed COI/Commitment Unrealistic or Vague Budgets Unidentified Cost Sharing Duplicative Funding Sources Selection/Awarding Subcontracts Example: Pre-Award Faculty member is a Co-PI on a research grant and his/her spouse has a company that provides a service that is needed as part of the grant. The spouse’s company is paid $80,000 to provide the service with grant funds and no disclosure of the COI is made to the granting agency or University COI committee. During Effort Reporting Conflict of Commitment Costs Charged – Allowable and Allocable Stewardship of Resources Monitoring Subcontracts Tracking Cost Sharing Examples: During University employee charged 100% effort to grant, despite participating in writing proposals for additional grants. Over $40,000 of personal items purchased and charged to research funds. Receipts were altered to misidentify the actual items purchased. Faculty member has personal business and University lab. Mixes use of personnel and resources between the two. Close-out Using Remaining Funds Stewardship of Retained Balances Falsifying Research Data/Results Close-out Example Equipment purchases near end of period of performance. PI with multiple grants, selectively charges the grants for expenditure to maximize the amount of funds that are retained rather than being returned to sponsor. What Can You Do? Review documents with professional skepticism Monitor transactions and budgets closely and reconcile accounts timely Ask questions and fully understand business transactions/dealings Communicate unsatisfied concerns to appropriate personnel Close the gap on internal control weaknesses noted during everyday work Notice “Red Flags” Behavioral Red Flags Living beyond means Experiencing financial difficulties Wheeler-dealer or entitled attitude Close relationship with vendor Pressure from within the organization Documentation/Records Indicators – Mistakes on Invoices (e.g., 4/31 date) – Photo-Copied Invoices/Apparent altering – Inconsistencies in documents and described purpose/actual goods received – Delays in Processing of Records – Rising Expenses/Falling Revenues (unusual trends) – Significant Number of Transactions Near Thresholds – Missing or vague documentation – Frequent Transfers of Expenses between budgets – Web Merchants Invoices C: Drive Rather Than URL 4/31 Receipt 1/22/2020 Receipt Supporting Invoice Budget Reviews QTRLY PAY SUMMARY 09/01/20XX THRU 12/31/20XX TOTAL_HRS GROSS PAY NET PAY EMPLOYEE 640.00 $ 6,400.00 $ 4,910.09 BOBBY 463.00 4,630.00 3,593.19 ANDY 264.00 2,640.00 2,310.64 TOMMY 213.20 2,150.35 1,556.69 MIKE 189.00 1,890.00 1,672.67 STEVE 175.00 1,750.00 1,556.20 JAMES 117.00 1,170.00 1,052.65 LUKE 114.50 1,145.00 1,019.74 TYLER 32.50 325.00 287.47 JOHN 8.00 80.00 67.57 CHRIS Detection (ACFE 2010 Report to the Nations) Detection (ACFE 2010 Report to the Nations) Percent of Cases Tip Management Review Internal Audit By Accident Account Reconciliation Document Examination Percent of Cases External Audit Surveillance/Monitoring Notified by Police Confession IT Controls 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% Source of Tips (ACFE 2010 Report to the Nations) Source of Tips Employee Customer Anonymous Vendor Shareholder/Owner Competitor Perpetrator's Acquaintance Percent of Tips 49.2% 17.8% 13.4% 12.1% 3.7% 2.5% 1.8% Internal Controls Modified or Implemented in response to Fraud (ACFE 2010 Report to the Nations) Control Implemented/Modified Increased Segregation of Duties Management Review Surprise Audits Fraud Training for Employees Fraud Training for Managers/Executives Job Rotation/Mandatory Vacation Internal Audit/FE Department Anti-Fraud Policy Code of Conduct External Audit of F/S Hotline External Audit of ICOFR Independent Audit Committee Management Certification of F/S Rewards for Whistleblowers Employee Support Programs Percent of Cases 61.2% 50.6% 22.5% 16.4% 14.8% 13.5% 12.3% 11.7% 8.7% 8.7% 7.9% 7.8% 6.0% 5.9% 4.0% 1.8% Age of Perpetrator (ACFE 2010 Report to the Nations) Resources Available Human Resource Representatives Financial Officers Compliance Hotline (1-800-560-1637) Internal Audit Unit College Research Administration Office Office of Sponsored Programs Office for Research Protections College of Medicine Research Affairs QUESTIONS???