Bus 411 DAY 19 Agenda Molson Coors Case Study Team work Send me your presentation at least 30 min prior to class All presentation will be uploaded to class slides directory for further use and evaluation . teams Team 1 J. Harbison N. Lozier M. Martin Team 2 C. Brusig C. Pennine T. Nhundu J. Jalbert Team 3 K. Beaulieu M. Doucette D. Lemon Timeline April 6 April 10 First round scores received & discussed Team 1 Case Study Five Hershey Foods Corporation Case study team work April 13 (Friday the 13th) Team 3 Case Study Four Molson Coors Brewing Company Case study team work General Feed back on First Round Case Studies Team 2 Case Study Six Kellogg Company Case study team work April 17 Team 3 Case Study Seven Freddo (Ice Cream Co.) Case study team work April 20 April 24 Team 3 Case Study 21 USA Truck Case study team work Last 3 cases are student choice Team 2 Case Study 20 AirTran Airways Case study team work April 27 Second round Scores received Student choose Last Case Team 1 Case Study 19 JetBlue Airlines Case study team work May1 and 4 Take home portion of Final exam assigned May 8 in Class Final exam Take home portion of final exam due Bring Calculators Case Presentation Analysis Company: Date: Presenting Team Members: Place comments after each rating. Ratings (circle the appropriate numbers). Poor Below Average Average Above Average Superior 1. Mission and Vision Statement 1 2 3 4 5 2. Thoroughness, accuracy, and depth of external analysis 1 2 3 4 5 3. Thoroughness, accuracy, and depth of internal analysis 1 2 3 4 5 4. Identification and evaluation of alternative strategies using matrices 1 2 3 4 5 5. Quality, quantity, feasibility, and relevance of recommendations 1 2 3 4 5 6. Justification and support for recommendations 1 2 3 4 5 1. Organization of presentation 1 2 3 4 5 2. Professionalism of presentation 1 2 3 4 5 3. Use of visuals and color 1 2 3 4 5 4. Communication skills of team 1 2 3 4 5 5. Use of time (40 min presentation) 1 2 3 4 5 6. Handling of questions (up to 10 minutes) 1 2 3 4 5 OVERALL EVALUATION: 1 2 3 4 5 CONTENT DELIVERY Numeric Score = 40 + (Avg * 12) Peer Review for Case studies In rating yourself and your team members, use a one- to five-point scale, where 5 = superior, 4 = above average, 3 = average, 2 = below average, and 1 = really weak. Add the scores to obtain a total score for yourself and the other group members. Put any comments you like on the bottom or back of this page. Fold this sheet when you complete the ratings below. If you receive a poor rating on this evaluation, your final case average will be lowered one letter grade. A superior rating may add points to the final case average. Put your name and your team members’ names in the spaces provided, one name at the top of each column. Names: Ratings: On time for all group meetings: Helped keep the group cohesive: Number of useful ideas contributed: Quantity of work done: Quality of work done: + Add Total Scores Here: + + + General Feedback Redo the following Reread Chap 5, 6 & 9 and Part 5 Recommend strategies not actions Strategies are listed in Table 5-3 and Figure 5-3 Actions are implementations of strategy Get the Facts right DO the research Use and List Good sources Be consistent, Make sure all the data is from the same Time frame Don’t BS If you say you are going to get back to me THEN GET BACK TO ME! Research > 50% of the job Format Identify Mission, Vision, Objectives, Strategies Develop New Vision and Mission Most are poor CPM EFE Identify internal strengths and weaknesses IFE Financial ratios Analyze SWOT Matrix SPACE BCG IE matrix Grand Strategy Matrix QSPM Give advantage and disadvantages of alternative strategies Recommend Identify external opportunities and threats Specify how strategies are to be implemented and what results to expect Recommend specific annual objectives (goal) and polices Recommend procedures for evaluation Be Original – Take chances Strategies and long range objectives Show cost But make sure it is realistic Remember business rewards risk taking Be ready for Cross-examination