THE MOORISH NATIONAL REPUBLIC THE MOORISH DIVINE AND

THE MOORISH NATIONAL REPUBLIC
THE MOORISH DIVINE AND NATIONAL MOVEMENT OF THE WORLD
Aboriginal and Indigenous Natural Peoples of North-West Amexem North America
Affidavit of Fact
(Unlawful Demand of Immunization)
November 7, 2009
I Am your name here, Natural Person, In Propria Persona Sui Juris (not to be confused with, nor substituted by, Pro Se by
unauthorized hand of another). I am Aboriginal Indigenous Moorish-American; possessing Free-hold by Inheritance and
Primogeniture Status; standing squarely Affirmed, aligned and bound to the Zodiac Constitution, with all due respect and
honors given to the Constitution for the United States Republic, North America. Being a descendant of Moroccans and born
in America, with the blood of the Ancient Moabites from the Land of Moab, who received permission from the Pharaohs of
Egypt to settle and inhabit North-West Africa / North Gate. The Moors are the founders and are the true possessors of the
present Moroccan Empire; with our Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren, who sojourned from the land of Canaan, seeking
new homes. Our dominion and inhabitation extended from Northeast and Southwest Africa, across the Great Atlantis, even
unto the present North, South and Central America and the Adjoining Islands-bound squarely affirmed to THE TREATY OF
PEACE AND FRIENDSHIP OF SEVENTEEN HUNDRED AND EIGHTY-SEVEN (1787) A.D. superseded by THE
TREATY OF PEACE AND FRIENDSHIP OF EIGHTTEEN HUNDRED and THIRTY-SIX (1836) A.D. between Morocco
and the United States (http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/diplomacy/barbary/barl866t.htm or at Bevines Law Book of
Treaties) the same as displayed under Treaty Law, Obligation, Authority as expressed in Article VI of the Constitution for
the United States of America (Republic):
THE TREATY OF PEACE AND FRIENDSHIP OF 1836 A.D.
Between Morocco and the United States
Article 20
“If any of the Citizens of the United States, or any Persons under their Protection, shall have any disputes with each other, the
Consul shall decide between the Parties, and whenever the Consul shall require any Aid or Assistance from our Government,
to enforce his decisions, it shall be immediately granted to him.”
Article 21
“If any Citizen of the United States should kill or wound a Moor, or, on the contrary, if a Moor shall kill or wound a Citizen
of the United States, the Law of the Country shall take place, and equal Justice shall be rendered, the Consul assisting at the
Trial; and if any Delinquent shall make his escape, the Consul shall not be answerable for him in any manner whatever.”
United Nations Declaration of the Rights of the Child Principal Three (3)
United Nations Rights of Indigenous Peoples Part 1, Article Four (4)
United Nations Declaration of Human Rights Article Fifteen (15)
United States Republic Constitution North America Amendment 13, Section 12 – The traffic in slaves with Africa is
hereby forever prohibited on pain of death and the forfeiture of all the rights and property of persons engaged
therein; and the descendants of Africans shall not be citizens.
I am a Moorish American National Aboriginal Indigenous to the land, this mandate does not apply to me, as I am
not a Union State Citizen. The United States Republic North American Constitution does not give any rights to
government and government cannot give or take rights away from the people this mandate does not apply to this and
all Moorish Americans of North American. Furthermore, as this government agency does not have jurisdiction over
this Moorish American this mandate does not apply.
The sole obligation of government, as stipulated in the United States Republic North American Constitution Article
IV Section IV, as a Republican form of government is to secure and protect the rights of the People domestically and
internationally.
Any attempt at force, threat, duress, cohersion, extortion shall be a direct violation of your "Oath of Office” and is
an act of treason and be remedied at law both domestically and internationally.
Reid Vs. Covert., 354 U.S. 1 (1957), 1 L. Ed. 2 nd. 1148 "The United States is entirely a creature of the
Federal Constitution, its power and authority has no other source and it can only act in accordance with all
the limitations imposed by the Constitution.”
Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958)
Note: Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against
that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge is engaged in
acts of treason.
United States v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1, 56 S.Ct. 312, 102 A.L.R. 914, decided January 6, 1936 “Neither
consent nor submission by the states can enlarge the powers of Congress; none can exist except those
which are granted
Chisholm v. Georgia, (2 Dall) 440, 455 Thus, the People themselves, either singly or collectively, are
sovereign, supra at 456, over both the State and the federal government and are the true SOVEREIGNS
within this nation.
"The law provides that once State and Federal Jurisdiction has been challenged, it must be proven."
Main v. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502 (1980)
"Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time." and "Jurisdiction, once challenged, cannot be assumed and
must be decided." Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co. 495 F 2d 906, 910.
"Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it must be proved to exist."
Stuck v. Medical Examiners 94 Ca 2d 751. 211 P2d 389.
"There is no discretion to ignore that lack of jurisdiction." Joyce v. US, 474 F2d 215.
Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 155 (1966), cited also in Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649.644
"Constitutional 'rights' would be of little value if they could be indirectly denied."
Juliard v. Greeman, 110 U.S. 421 (1884)
Supreme Court Justice Field, 'There is no such thing as a power of inherent sovereignty in the government
of the United States... In this country, sovereignty resides in the people, and Congress can exercise power
which they have not, by their Constitution, entrusted to it. All else is withheld."
MIRANDA v. ARIZONA , 384 U.S. 436 (1966) 491; 86 S. Ct. 1603
"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no 'rule making' or legislation which
would abrogate them."
Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 p. 442
"An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it
creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed."
Perez v. Brownell, 356 U.S. 44, 7; 8 S. Ct. 568, 2 L. Ed. 2d 603 (1958)
"...in our country the people are sovereign and the government cannot sever its relationship to them by
taking away their citizenship."
Ministerial officers are incompetent to receive grants of judicial power from the legislature, their acts in
attempting to exercise such powers are necessarily nullities.” Burns v. Supp. Ct., SF, 140 Cal. 1.
A response is required within 10 days of receipt of this Affidavit of Fact.
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal – Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent.
Thank You,
I Am: ______________________________
Your name here, Authorized Representative
Natural Person, In Propria Persona:
Ex Relatione your name here
All Rights Reserved: U.C.C. 1-207/1-308; U.C.C.1-103
Sovereign name of your territory here ie. Quinnehtukqut Territory
c/o your mailing location
City, State Republic [Zip Exempt]
Non-Domestic
Cc:
United Nations
Geneva Switzerland
United States Justice Department
United States Attorney General
Eric H. Holder
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
(formerly The Supreme Court)
State of Connecticut Governor
M. Jodi Rell
State of Connecticut Attorney General
Attorney Richard Blumenthal
State of Connecticut Secretary of State
Susan Bysiewicz
Study collections