TABLE OF CONTENTS - maritime DC & PPE Information Center

ADVANCED DAMAGE CONTROL

TEST PLAN

1999

Damage Control Engineering

Test Facility (DCETF)

Naval Reserve Center

Fort McHenry

1201 Halsey Place

Baltimore, Maryland

Prepared for:

Naval Sea Systems Command SEA 03L4

27 January 1999

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

List of Changes .............................................................................................................. i

Table of Contents .......................................................................................................... ii

Advanced DC Test Procedures ............................................................... Enclosure (1)

Background .............................................................................................................. 1

A. Objective ........................................................................................................... 1

B. Test / Evaluation Objectives ............................................................................ 1

C. Approach .......................................................................................................... 1

D. Damage Control Test Series ........................................................................... 2

E. DC Test Equipment Required ......................................................................... 5

F. Safety Team Requirements ............................................................................. 6

G. Test Team Assignment .................................................................................... 9

I. Safety Team Guidelines

NRC Baltimore/DCETF Damage Control Safety for DC Tests .............. Enclosure (2)

Advanced DC Design Test Plan .............................................................. Enclosure (3)

Daily Schedule of Events ......................................................................... Endosure (4)

Proposed List of Participants ................................................................. Enclosure (5)

Damage Control Test Objectives / Procedures ..................................... Endosure (6)

2

NEW SHIP DESIGN

DAMAGE CONTROL TEST PROCEDURES

DAMAGE CONTROL DESIGN TESTS

References:

1. NSTM 079 Vol II

2. NWP 62-1 series

3. Damage control and firefighting equipment layout booklet NAVSEA SS-

100-AG-MAN-010

A. Background

A study was conducted to establish a baseline and to determine if the significant different structural design of ships (e.g. lack of transverse frames; larger number of longitudinal) as compared to conventional ships may lead to problems and or opportunities related to damage control issues. The preliminary results of that study have identified impacts, positive and negative, on Damage

Control design, equipment and procedure requirements which need to be evaluated to determine and validate the new DC equipment, procedures and ship design options to optimize Damage Control and ship survivability utilizing the reduced manning concept.

B. Objective

Conduct Damage Control testing and evaluation to determine the best procedures, new equipment and design requirement options that will optimize

Damage Control and Fire Fighting in the ship design.

C. Test / Evaluation Objectives

To compare data with the established baseline by providing a measure of effectiveness for combating various types of shipboard underwater hull damage in an actual flooding environment and set up and operate all DC emergency equipment associated with each test as specified in NSTM 079 Vol II.

D. Approach

This phase of the study will test and evaluate the effect iveness of today’s shipboard DC equipment and procedures using the Damage Control Engineering

Test Facility (DCETF), Naval Reserve Center, Fort McHenry, Baltimore, Maryland.

3

E. Damage Control Test Series

1. AVT – 10 Ventilation System – Rhine Air Phase 2

2. Flex Lite Line 360

3. Magnetic Holder, Bulkhead attachment (30 lbs. And less)

4. Pipe Repair Fuel Clamp (cold weather)

5. SCBA – Water Survival – Wet suit (cold weather)

6.

Dewatering using 1 ½” eductor

7. Splinter Boxes Flooding Control (Box Patch)

8. Shoring steel to secure splinter box

9. Shoring

– wood to secure splinter box

10. Dewatering using 1 ½” electric sub pump

11. Dewatering, Downflooding

12. Emergency escape / personnel rescue using SKED stretcher

13. SCBA Water immersion with FFE

14. Flooding Control

15. Cutting access

16. Kit

– Repair 8 Investigator Evaluation

1. TEST 001: AVT-10 Ventilation System – Rhine Air

OBJECTIVE: AVT10 unit to be tested using ½” quick disconnect fitting, air supply at 50 cfm using 8” and 10” ducting to determine its efficiency and effectiveness.

PROCEDURE: Set up blower on 02 level, vent B1, B2 & F1. Set up Smoke

Generator. Obtain time for smoke removal.

2. TEST 002: Flextite Line 360

OBJECTIVE: Determine illuminance in smoke filled compartment and reduce smoke.

PROCEDURE: Run test in B1, B2 and F1 in conjunction with AVT-10 test.

3. TEST 003: Magnetic Holder Bulkhead Attachment, 12, 20, 35 and 50 lbs. and less.

OBJECTIVE: Determine if the magnetic holders work satisfactorily in a wet environment.

4

PROCEDURE: Place various tools and equipment in a flooded space.

Tools to be used in DC recovery operations are placed in various size / weight capability holder to determine if they work efficiently.

4. TEST 004: Pipe Repair Fuel Resistant Clamps

OBJECTIVE: Determine if the pipe clams is effective for a fuel pipe leak.

PROCEDURE: Perform pipe repair in A1 JP-5 line.

5. TEST 005: SCBA Water Survival Wet Suit (Cold Weather)

OBJECTIVE: To determine water survival techniques in salt water (cold) environment specifying specific skills for survival.

PROCEDURE: Provide two test personnel, fully outfitted in wet suit and

SCBA. Establish salt water content, the same as sea water.

6. TEST 006: Dewatering Using 1 ½” Eductor

OBJECTIVE:

Determine effectiveness of dewatering using 1 ½” eductor discharging through a passing port actuated by 85 PSI firemain pressure.

7. TEST 007:

Splinter Boxes, 12”, 14”, 16” Diameter

OBJECTIVE: Determine if the splinter box patch technique is effective in controlling flooding due to missile or torpedo hit damage. Also determine number of personnel required to install.

PROCEDURE: Install each size of splinter patch over the respective bulkhead damage in A2, B1. Install telescopic steel shore to hold in place.

Use a two man repair party for the 12” patch and a three man repair party for the 14” and 16” splinter patches.

8. TEST 008: Shoring Using Steel Telescopic Shores

OBJECTIVE: Determine if there are any special tools or procedures required.

PROCEDURE: Install splinter box patches in A2, B1. Use steel shoring to support patch and hold in place.

9. TEST 009: Shoring Using Wooden Shores

OBJECTIVE: Install patches in A2, B1. Use wooden shore to support splinter box patch and hold it in place.

5

10. TEST 010: Dewatering Using 115 Volt Sub-Pump

OBJECTIVE: Determine efficiency of dewatering smaller compartments with

115 volt sub-pump, weight = 30 lbs.

PROCEDURE: Dewater compartment using 115 volt electric sub-pump.

Discharge through passing port. Determine volume of water removed, discharge height and GPM.

11. TEST 011: Dewatering by Downflooding

OBJECTIVE: Determine best method of down flooding dewatering technique.

PROCEDURE: Flood compartment A2 and B2. Lower flood water to lower center of gravity to A1 and B1. Use valve and scuttle.

12. TEST 012: Emergency Escape / Personnel Rescue Using SKED Stretcher

OBJECTIVE: Determine efficiency of the SKED Stretcher in a shipboard environment. vertical lift. Rescued person to wear FFE Boots / SCBA in a smoke filled trunk.

PROCEDURE: Place rescuee at the bottom of trunk – filled with smoke.

Rescuer to be wearing FFE, Boots and SCBA. Place rescuer in SKED stretcher. Lift rescuer to 02 level.

13. TEST 013: SCBA Water Immersion with FFE

OBJECTIVE: Determine specific water survival and safety skills while wearing an SCBA with a FFE.

PROCEDURE: Obtain salt water content comparable to sea water for evaluation. Set up in compartment A1 – Fill space to 4 ft. of water.

14. TEST 014: Flooding Control Wear FFE / SCBA Smoke Filled Space

OBJECTIVE: Determine efficiency of SCBA in a flooded space. The wearer donned in FFE.

PROCEDURE: Outfil wearer in FFE, boots, and SCBA. Enter smoke filled flooded compartment to perform damage control operations. Set up in

Compartment A1.

15. TEST 015: Cutting Access Exothermic Torch

OBJECTIVE: Review safety procedures using PECU

6

PROCEDURE: Flooding / smoke in Compartment A2. Place PECU on 02 level. Determine area to cut, make 6” diameter cut in deck, overhead of

Compartment A2.

16. TEST 016: Repair 8 Investigator Kit

OBJECTIVE: Determine total cost, weight and volume of kit. Determine practicality and impact for stowage.

PROCEDURE: Set up kit on 02 level. Determine practical application of kit and contents. Recommend to delete items not required.

F. DC Test Equipment Required (equipment will be provided from DCRS 2)

1. Plugging and Shoring Tool Kit a. Shoring Material Kit

(1) SteelShores(6-11ft)

(2) Wooden Shores (4" x 4" x 10' long) b. Box Patch c. Folding Plate Patch d. DC Plugs e. Air Bag f. Pneumatic Adjustable Shore

2. Pipe Patching Kit a. b. c. d. e.

Banding Kit

EWARP

Jubilee Kit

Soft Patch

Hose Clamp / Rubber

3. 1½” Eductor with 1½” and 2½” fire hoses and 2½” x 10' hard suction hose

4. Electric Sub Pump with 2½” x 50' fire hose and 10" hard suction hose

5.

Electric Sub Pump with 1½” x 50' fire hose

6.

Fire hose (for Jumper Rig) 1½” x 50' (two each), Jumper Connections 3" (two each), 4" pipe

7. Fire hoses, 1½” x 50' (2 each)

8. Air Bag

G. Safety Team Requirements

7

1. Damage Control Test Series Exercises a. Safety Pre-Brief

Describe the DC Test safety precautions that are applicable to the test being conducted. b. Safety Team Communications: verbal

2. DC Tests Safety Brief Objectives a. Function safely to control and stop flooding and other damage under simulated conditions by using flooded compartments to conduct emergency damage control operations. b. Safety of personnel is of paramount importance throughout the preparation and testing conducted at the DCETF, NRC,

Baltimore. This plan delineates those standards and procedures for minimizing the risk to personnel and provides for:

• An effective organization to monitor and supervise the damage control equipment test evolutions

• Hazard identification and abatement, through preliminary background tests prior to fleet participation.

H. Test Team Assignments a) TEST DIRECTOR: Overall, the Test Director is responsible for the safety of all personnel and for ensuring that DCETF evolutions are conducted in a safe manner. Duties include verifying the DCETF setup; securing of systems and their associated hardware; observing all personnel while on the DCETF to ensure safe evolutions; monitoring external conditions that will affect the test evolution, such as wind speed, wind direction, weather changes (i.e., rain, thunder, lightning); and any other situation that will disrupt training/testing. Maintain communications with the Operations

Control Room and know the location of the Corpsman in the event that he/she is needed. In the event of a mishap, the Test Director will take charge of the situation, notify the NRC office of the mishap and will be positioned to be able to observe the entire evolution and monitor the test. b) ASSISTANT TEST DIRECTOR: Responsible for the safe coordination of the DCETF evolution. Duties consist of ensuring that the personnel are properly dressed-out in safety equipment and that they are briefed on the hazards associated with the evolution. Ensure that all personnel have a full understanding of operational and emergency procedures of the evolution. The Assistant Test Director will be positioned to be able to respond to an emergency and to maintain the safety of the personnel conducting the evolution. c) TECHNICAL ASSISTANT: Responsible for the safety of all personnel involved with the DCETF evolution. Duties consist of ensuring that the personnel are dressed-out in the proper safety equipment and that safety

8

precautions are being observed. At the conclusion of the test evolution, coordinate with the Assistant Test Director in securing the DCETF. The

Technical Assistant will be positioned so as to respond to an emergency, to direct personnel when required, and to assist in avoiding a mishap. d) SAFETY TEAM MEMBERS: Responsible for the operation of all DC equipment during the test. They will be responsible for developing and refining new Design damage control procedures and time lines and conduct equipment evaluation. They will also monitor participants and possibly assist in data collection.



Safety Team Members – Ken Carter (JJMA), Greg Bielawski (JJMA),

Craig Beck (NSWC Carderock) and Richard Krowe EnSURE, Inc.

I. Safety Team Guidelines a) Under the guidance of the Test Director, the safety team organization will accomplish the following:

1. Review test plan and be thoroughly familiar with test objectives.

2. Familiarize themselves with test area and be cognizant of locations for possible trip hazards, obstructions, instrumentation, stationary cameras, DC personnel protection, and egress routes.

3. Inventory DCRS equipment and ensure the appropriate equipment is available and operational to meet test objectives.

4. Inventory personal protection equipment and distribute to test personnel.

5. Review safety team positioning for damage control equipment tests (Re:

DCETF layout).

NOTE: THE TEST DIRECTOR WILL BE FREE TO MOVE ABOUT THE TEST

AREA

TO OBSERVE THE OVERALL OPERATION.

6. Primary test area (deck frame 47-77 starboard) safety team member #1 is positioned on 1 st Deck). Safety team member #2 is positioned on the

Upper 02 Level and will have a whistle.

7. Safety team member #3 will be positioned at other test areas as appropriate.

8. Review primary and emergency egress routes (Re: Figure 2).

J. Termination Criteria

1. Normally, termination of a test will be initiated by the test director or the test supervisor. In the event that any safety team member feels unsure or believes an unsafe condition exist, he may stop the exercise (blow whistle) in his area of responsibility and report to the test director the actions taken. The test director will then determine whether to continue or

9

to terminate the exercise.

2. Any time an individual has any apprehension concerning his or her personal safety or that of another, he or she will seek guidance from the senior safety team member present and signal for a time out to clarify the situation and to receive or provide additional information as may be appropriate.

K. Requirements

1. No more than four (4) personnel will be allowed in a compartment at one time.

2. Must wear appropriate personnel protective clothing and equipment.

3. Electrical safety procedures and gloves must be worn by personnel using electrical equipment during tests.

4. Use Safety goggles for eye hazards (electrical saw).

5. Proper use and safety of tools.

6. Ladder safety - one person at a time and use hand rails.

7. Wear gloves while handling shores.

L. Test Team Assignment

1. Test Team Assignments a. (2) Plugging team b. (4) Shoring team (I and K) (may hold a 2nd job) c. (2) Pipe Patching team d. (2) Pipe Jumper team e. (1) Access PECU (may hold a second job)

2. Dewatering a. Test Leader order the following equipment set up:

1. l ½” 'eductor

2. Sub pumps and electrical safety gloves to scene (Well

Deck)

3. PECU

NOTES: 1. CUT SHORING WITH POWER SAW/HAND SAW ON DRY DECK

BEFORE TAKING TIMBER INTO FLOODED COMPARTMENT (USE

SAFETY GOGGLES WHEN CUTTING WITH POWER SAW)

2. SET UP ELECTRIC SUB PUMP AND OPERATE (USE ELECTRICAL

10

SAFETY GLOVES)

11

NRC, BALTIMORE / DCETF

SAFETY FOR DAMAGE CONTROL TESTS

A PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT

Personnel will be issued appropriate personnel protection clothing and equipment upon arrival at the DCETF. This equipment will be properly stowed within the DCUPS 2-1. Repair personnel will work out of DCUPS 2-1 and the DC

Test Locker.

B SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Prior to every test, a walk through should be performed to Identify deficiencies with equipment and to allow for basic familiarization and orientation in the compartment arrangements where testing is to be conducted. During this time the team should be encouraged to discuss the test, how to best attack it and make recommendations/suggestions for how to obtain the best performance and efficiency from the team. This walk through will allow an outstanding opportunity to perform test related training. The pro-test walk through should include:



Thorough description/discussion of the Tests.



Team outfitting in required clothing.



Entry to the area with all equipment needed.



Simulation of actions.



Exit from the compartment.

2. At the end of every test there should be a "lessons learned" discussion/debrief. Particular attention should be paid to any problems encountered with equipment or procedures. Action items to correct known deficiencies should be written at this time.

3. Specific guidelines must be established and enforced, by the on site safety teams, to allow for termination of tests when appropriate. Every effort must be made to prevent an actual casualty.

C. SAFETY REQUIREMENTS FOR EVERY TEST

1. Following are MANDATORY Safety requirements for each test;



There will be one safety observer when personnel are in compartments.



Personnel participating in all tests must wear safety equipment, if necessary.

12



Electrical Gloves must be worn by personnel using electrical equipment during tests.



Safety goggles must be worn where eye hazards are present.



Proper/Safe use of hand tools must be assured at all times.



One person on a ladder at a time, use handrails.



When handling shores, gloves must be worn. When cutting shores, eye protection must be worn.

2. Safety observers must pay particular attention to the clothing/equipment the test team dons and uses. If they observe persons having difficulty with breathing, restricted movement, evidence of disorientation or panic, immediate action must be taken to correct the situation.

3. Safety observers shall review equipment PM records routinely. In addition, observers must pay attention to specific tools and equipment being used to conduct the tests. Leaks in hoses, low water pressure, damaged tools or malfunctioning equipment must be quickly identified and corrective actions taken. IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT NO DEFICIENT EQUIPMENT BE PROVIDED OR

USED FOR ANY TEST.

D. GENERAL SAFETY BRIEFING FOR EVERY TEST



Describe the test in detail.



Sight the test area for safety hazards/obstructions etc.



Identify communications to be used.



Describe the objectives of the test.



Brief proper operation and use of each piece of equipment to be used in the test.



Identify Specific Hazards related to the test and the equipment used.



Discuss "time out" / "stop" procedures.



Review procedures for terminating the tests.



Review emergency rescue procedures.



Identify locations for first aid equipment and primary routes to medical aid station. (The first aid kit is placed in the central control room.)

13



Review Safety Team positioning.

E. GENERAL HUMAN FACTOR COMMENTS

1. Ongoing observation/evaluation must be conducted to assure that all damage control equipment provided is adequate for use in the tests. Drink a lot of water and take frequent breaks (in hot weather) and stay warm to prevent severe hypothermia (in cold weather).

2. In performance of these tests. lift and carry limitations for individuals could be easily exceeded. Care must be taken by the Team leader regarding assignment of personnel to specific tasks.

3. Adequate sizes and quanrities of Personnel Protective Equipment must be immedisteiy available. Damage Control Fire Fighting Clothing, OBA's, SCBA’s,

Gloves, Boots, etc, tend to run large and will be required by potentially larger number of smaller stature personnel.

4. Team members must demonstrate the ability to don, fit test and operate an

OBA / SCBA prior to use in any test where is it required.

F. HUMAN FACTOR REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH TEST



Review test plan to identify hazards.



Inventory OCUPS and test locker storeroom equipment to ensure adequacy/quantity to support testing.



Inventory PPE, paying particular attention to sizes and quantities.



Brief proper lifting techniques for moving heavy objects (test electric davit).



Two personnel must handle equipment weighing over 42 Ibs.

NOTE: ALL TEAM MEMBERS SHOULD BE THOROUGHLY FAMILIAR WTH THE

IDENTIFICATION, SET UP AND USE OF EACH PIECE OF EQUIPME^

THAT WILL BE USED IN A GIVEN TEST. THIS IS ESSENTIAL TO THE

SAFE PERFORMANCE OF THE TESTS AND TO ACCURATELY

DETERMINING TIME REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE OF

PARTICULAR TASKS.

1. HULL PLUGGING. This is a flooded compartment test. The test requires the use of a plugging kit bag that weighs 59 pounds. Two persons should be assigned to carry this bag to the casualty area. Once to the compartment, the team leader should be able to assign any task to any person without fear of exceeding lift/carry limitations. Care must be taken to assure that the actual area

14

requiring repair is within the overhead reach limits of the person assigned to perform the task (floating deck test).

2. SHORING. This test will involve the use of several pieces of relatively heavy pieces of equipment ranging in weight from 26 to 53 pounds. Since combined male/female lift and carry limits of 42 pounds are exceeded with the 4" x 4" x 12" pieces of shoring material (53 pounds each) and due to their length, 2 persons should be assigned to carry them. EXTREME CARE WILL BE NECESSARY ON

LADDERS. The 11' steel shore also nears lift limits and would be better handled by 2 persons.

3. PIPE PATCHING. This function requires the use of material that is relatively light in weight. NOTE: Team members should be cautioned that this procedure/kit requires the use of protective gloves.

4. RIG 1 1/2" EDUCTOR. This function requires the use of materiais that are relatively light in weight. The team leader should be able to assign any task to any person but overhead reach criteria must be considered when rigging off the firemain.

5. RIG ELECTRICAL SUB-PUMP. For this function, one piece of electrical cable is needed. The submersible pump and 115 volt 45' cables should be handled by 1 person. CAUTION: A QUALIFIED ELECTRICIAN IS REQUIRED in performance of this test. Electrical protective clothing and equipment must be utilized and established safety procedures must he strictly adhered to. In addition, extreme caution must be exercised when moving the submersible pump up and down ladders. When rigging the submersible electric pump, ensure all electrical safety equipment and procedures are utilized. e) RIG PORTABLE EXOTHERMIC TORCH. This test requires use of several items, the total is relatively heavy materials. The Team Leader will assign task to three (3) personnel to assist in carrying the PECU kit. Wear protective clothing, gloves, footwear, and goggles when cutting.

15

EQUIPMENT REQUIRMENTS

TEST #1

– AIR TEST

(1) ¾” x 50’ Air Hose

TEST #2A

– DEWATERING

(1) 1 ½” Eductor

(1) 1 ½” x 50’ Fire Hose

TEST #2B – DEWATERING

(1)

1 ½” Eductor

(2) 1 ½” x 50’ Fire Hoses

(2)

2 ½” x 50’ Fire Hoses

(2) 2 ½” x 10’ Hard Suction Hoses

TEST #2C – DEWATERING

(2) Submersible Pump (2 ½” disch.)

(2) 75’ Lengths of Cable

(1) 2 ½” x 10’ Hard Rubber Suction

Hose

(1) Foot Valve Strainer

(1) 2 ½” x 50’ firehose

TEST #2D – DEWATERING

(1) Submersible Pump (1 ½” disch.)

(2) 1 ½” x 50’ firehose

TEST #4 – JUMPERING

EMERGENCY PIPE REPAIR

Pipe Patching Kit

(1) Pipe Repair Tool Bag

(1) Cutter (1/8” to 2”)

(1) Cutter (2 ½” to 4”)

(4) 2 ½” x 50’ Fire Hoses

TESTS #5A, 5B, 6A, 6B – SHORING

Damage control Shoring Kit

Plugging Tool Box

Shoring Tool Kit

Steel Shore (3-

5’)

Steel Shore (6-

11’)

Maul

(6) Wood Shores 4” x 4” x 12’

TEST #8 – PROVIDE R&A

EQUIPMENT TO SHIP IN DISTRESS

(IN COLD WEATHER)

10 lbs

20

25

20

25

35

16

100

60

16

16

35

20

25 lbs lbs lbs lbs (each) lbs (each) lbs (each) lbs each lbs each lbs lbs lbs each lbs each lbs

38

12

19

35 lbs lbs lbs lbs (each)

16

33

26

40

6.7

53.2 lbs lbs lbs lbs lbs lbs (each)

16

Shoring Kit

Dewatering Kit

Desmoking Equipment

Rescue Equipment

Equipment R&A Chest (2)

SCBA (6)

Fire Fighters’ Kit

Cold Weather Suits (6)

TESTS #9A, 9B, 9C – FLOODING

CONTROL

Damage Control Plugging Kit

Tool Box

Plug Bag

Maul

TEST #10

– CUTTING ACCESS

HOLES

PECU Tool Box

Battery

Carry Case and Harness

Silica Cloth

Rods ¼” x 22”

Rods 3/8” x 36”

PECU Hose and Cable

(3) Oxygen Bottles

(1) 20” x 20” x ¾” = 30lb steel plate on 1 ½” x 1 ½” angle bracket (20 ½” x 20 ½” x 6” high)

TEST #11 – ACCESS AND RESCUE

RE: TESTS #5A, 5B, 6A, 6B

RE: TESTS #2A, 2B, 2C

RE: TEST #13

RE: TEST #10

lbs (each)

lbs (each)

25 lbs (each)

5 lbs (each)

16

59

6.7

20

10

12

6

7

34

6

30

50 lbs lbs lbs lbs lbs lbs lbs lbs lbs lbs lbs (each)

Dummy

TEST #12 – INTERIOR

COMPARTMENT SHORING

Shoring Tool Kit

(1) Steel Shore (3-

5’)

(1) 4” x 4” x 3’5” Wooden Shore

(2) 1 ½” x 4” x 10” Wooden Wedge

(1)12” x 12” x 4” Steel Box Patch

(1) 4” x 4” x 3’ Strongback

TEST #13

– VENTILATION OF

COMPARTMENTS

Rhine Air Driven Blower

Box Fan

Ram Fan w/Mister

(1) 8” x 15’ Vent Duct

(4) 1 ½” x 50’ Fire Hose

(1) 10” x 15’ Vent Duct

165 lbs

33

26

10

1

15

13.3

109

51

20.5

25

21.5 lbs lbs lbs lbs lbs lbs lbs lbs lbs lbs lbs

17

ADVANCED DAMAGE CONTROL ENGINEERING TEST

FACILITY (DCETF) TEST PLAN

FEBRUARY THROUGH JUNE 1999

1. Introduction

Damage Control (DC) Tests will be conducted from February 1999 through

September 1999 at the DCETF, which is located at the Naval Reserve Center, Fort

McHenry, Baltimore, MD. Throughout this effort, current DC procedures and equipment will be evaluated for their effectiveness and efficiency for all ship classes, and the necessary changes in procedures and equipment along with new ship design requirements will be determined. Performance baselines will also be evaluated for DC emergency functions under limited manpower conditions.

2. Background

Damage Control Functional requirements must be assessed for the reaction to casualties where the crew must attempt to: preserve stability; preserve watertight integrity (buoyancy); control list and trim; effect rapid repairs to compartments, platforms, and vital systems and equipment; counteract effects of fire and atmospheric degradation; and facilitate care of personnel casualties.

The incorporation of technology advances to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of Damage Control into these functional requirements will be evaluated at the DCETF.

New knowledge, new facilities, new equipment, are all considered in an evolving in a new ship design; materials, and new procedures are changing the way the functional performance DC requirements are met.

These tests conducted in the DCETF ship design mock up will provide a learning curve on damage control functions in the small space of the compartments and challenges of reduced manning for such practices as providing anchor points for shoring, dewatering, plugging and patching.

3. Objective

The output from the Damage Control test will be data that can be used to compare existing and potential new system components used in the performance of Damage Control functional requirements for new ship design. Specifically, this information will help to: a) Determine the validity of established and new preventive maintenance concepts used in a reduced manning environment. b) Wearing the SCBA to determine reliability and water survival techniques required. c) Assess qualitative values such as safety, human factors, accessibility, interchangeability of equipment and functions in the new ship design being evaluated. d) Establish a baseline for developing equipment set up timelines, by

18

developing measures of effectiveness for established procedures in the sensors and reduced manning environment. e) Establish the quantitative values of damage control personnel and equipment required for a flooded and / or damaged compartment.

4. Approach

The Damage Control tests will be conducted at NRC, Baltimore, MD’s

DCETF.

During February / March 1999 (cold weather) and April through September

1999, ship systems will be provided to include all appropriate facilities, information, materials, and equipment for conducting safe and controlled DC tests. The Test will be conducted by experienced senior Damage Control personnel. Safety practices for DC Tests (see Enclosure 2) will be established and enforced. All planned tests will be approved prior to commencement of the test.

February / March 1999 DC Test Personnel will perform Damage Control tests in cold weather environment with the Safety Team in place.

Test Area: Individual and Team responsibilities will be assigned. Data will be collected by installed sensors and video/time records. Debriefs will be conducted to identify lessons learned.

Practical challenges for the DC Tests appear deceptively simple. However, controlling and repairing simultaneous fire / smoke and flooding damage to an integrated system of compartments is a complex task. Methods for analysis will be developed and perfected as experience is gained throughout this effort.

Results will serve to improve functional Damage Control capabilities in shipboard compartments and provide a means to measure improvements.

5. Damage Control Tests a. Scope. This is the first set of damage control tests on the advanced new ship design mockup at the DCETF. The scope of the damage control tests is limited to the following damage control areas: location of damage, isolation, dewatering, plugging, pipe patching, shoring, use of emergency dewatering pumps and eductors, and emergency / rescue and escape.

6. OutPut a. Define procedures and equipment required for isolating a flooding casualty concurrent with hull damage in terms of access, effectiveness of current procedures, safety hazards, and the physiological effects of functioning in confined spaces in cold weather wearing the SCBA / FFE. b. Outline for potential improvements to specific DC functions. c. Input data for a physical stress mode! for performance of damage control functions

in confined spaces in cold weather and other adverse conditions.

19

d. Design for tests to validate DC procedures, equipment and new ship design

requirements for the Navy.

7. Instrumentation a) Video camera/still camera b) Hand held recorder c) Various types of sensors/gages

8. Safety

Prior to each test series, the safety team will develop a specific safety plan which includes safety team positions and responsibilities, communications, emergency egress and rescue.

The Maximum number of Repair Party personnel in the Flooded compartment at any one time will be three (3). The portable first aid box will be maintained in the Control Room.

20

DAILY SCHEDULE OF EVENTS

6 - 9 September, 1994

First Day - 6 September - Tuesday

AM -

PM -

Admin Check-in

Tour Damage Control Test Area

ADH Preparation

Safety Brief

Conduct Tests ^9A Flooding

Control (Dry Run) - Hurst Air Bag

-B3

^3

Firemain Access - B4, A2

,f4

Pipe Repair - B4, A2

Debrief Tests

Second Day - 7 September - Wednesday

AM - Safety Brief

Conduct Tests ^l Air Testing

Watertight integrity - ci

,fl0 Cutting

Access Holes - C4

^7

Emergency Escape - El, B1-4

^11

Personnel Rescue - A2, B5

Debrief Tests

PM - Safety

Stowage -

Desmoking Kit • CI

A2

Conduct Tests 18

(Hurst Air Bag) - B3

Submersible Pump - Bl,

Brief

Equipment

#l3 ventilation of Cell-

#9B Flooding Control

#2C Dewatering with

B2, B3

Debrief Tests

Third Day - 8 September - Thursday

AM - Safety Brief

- Conduct Tests ,foA Anchor Points (Steel) - Dl, F2, M

21

PM -

Â

iQB

#5B

#5A

#12

#13

Debrief Tests

Shoring (Steel) - Dl, F2, HI

Anchor Points (Wood) - Dl

Shoring (Wood) - Dl, F2, Hi (Optional)

Shoring (Pneumatic) - Dl, F2, HI interior Shoring-A2

Ventilation in Ceils-A2

SA fety

conduct Tests ^12 Flooding Control (Hurst.Air BagVinterior

Cell Shoring -A2

=2D Dewatering by Downflooding - A-l, A,2

^2A Dewatering with l^" Eductor - Al

,^2B Dewatering with 172" Eductor - B1

Brief

Debrief Tests

Fourth Day - 9 September - Friday

AM -

&

PM

First Day

Clean up, Preservation and Restow Gear

AM Admin Check-in

Rescue

Tour Damage Control Test Area

Safety Brief

Conduct Test #11 Personnel

Debrief Test

PM SA fety Brief

(Dry Run)

Conduct Test # 9A Flooding Control

Debrief Test

Second Day

AM -

PM -

Safety Brief

Conduct Tests #1 Air Testing Watertight integrity

ff 7 Emergency Escape

Debrief Tests

Safety Brief

Control (Hose)

Conduct Test # 9B Flooding

Debrief Test

22

Third Day

AM SAFE ty Brief

Points (Steel)

Conduct Tests # 6A Anchor

# 5A Shoring (Steel)

Debrief Tests

PM -

Fourth Day

Safety Brief

Control (Tank)

AM -

PM -

Conduct Test # 9C Flooding

Debrief Test

SA fety Brief

Conduct Tests # 65 Anchor points (wood)

# 5B Shoring (Wood)

Debrief Tests

Safety Brief

Conduct Tests # 2A Dewatering with 1 W Eductor

i 2B Dewatering with 1 72" Eductor

Debrief Tests

Fifth Day

AM -

PM -

Safety Brief

Conduct Tests i 3 Firemain Access

# 4 Pipe Repair

Debrief Tests

Safety

Conduct Test # 2C Dewatering with Submersible Pump

Debrief Test

Sixth Day

AM -

PM -

Safety Brief

Conduct Tests # 8 Equipment Stowage

# 10 Cutting Access Holes

Debrief Tests

Safety Brief conduct Test # 2D Dewatering by Downflooding

Debrief Test

23

Brief

ADVANCED DOUBLE HULL DESIGN PROPOSED LIST OF

PARTICIPANTS 8-13 August, 1994 6-9 September, 1994

SAFETY

John Taggert J. dark inc. Eric Cicmanec JJMA

TEST

John Hadley JJMA Robert Humprey JJMA Greg

Bieiawski JJMA Ken Carter JJMA Samuel Belton

JJMA (Newport News)

DATA COLLECTION

Dave Klinkhammer JJMA Van Trinh JJMA

REQUIRED SHIPSPORCE DURING ACTUAL TEST Earl Bonafede

Electrician Manton Smith ships Aux Support

GOVERNMENT OBSERVERS

Mr. Dave McAffe DTRC Code 7 - 8 September, 1994 2215

Mr. Hank Kuzma NAVSEA 7 9 SE ptember, 1994 Code 03G1

24

»

CT 5L TE r EA

TEST NO.

L/ S1 AR

El Fl F2 Gl HI i X

2A

2B

X

X

2C

2D

3

4

X

X x

X x x x x

X

5A

SB

6A

6B

7

8

9A —^— X x X X

X x x x 1 9B

^

9C

10

11 x X X x x x x X x x x x

X x x x x x x x x x x x

X x x x

X x x

12

13 x x

TEST NO. TITLE

-

2A

TEST SE-QUENCE

TEST r^T.T.

^T^ ^

—•::-•-- - ^ ^ — -\—~.-.^—-•/ ."-•

(1) SEALED CELLS

(2) STANDARD NAVY

DEWATERINC- W/ 1-2" EDUCTCR Al

2B DEWATERING W/ 1^" EDUCTOR Bl

2C

2D

3

4

DEWATERING W/ SUB-PUMP

DEWATERING BY

PIPE REPAIR

Al, Bl

A3

Al, A2, A3, A4

A3, B4

SEQUENCE

.- --

.. „

?- =AY 3

P? LAY 3

P5 LAY 2

P7 ÂY 3

P2 LAY 1

P3 LAY 1

25

5A

5B

5C

6A

6B

9C

9B

10

7

8

9A

SHORING (STEEL)

SHORING (WOOD)

SHORING, (PNEUMATIC)

ANCHOR POINTS (STEEL)

ANCHOR POINTS (WCOD)

Fl, F2

Fl, F2

Fl, F2

Cl, C2, Dl, Fl,

F2, HI

Dl, Fl, F2, HI

EMERGENCY ESCAPE

(1) 48" X 43" CELL

(2) 36" x 36" CELL

El,

B2, B3, B4,

EQUIPMENT STOWAGE Gl

(1) SHORING KIT

(2) DEWATERING KIT

(3) FIREFIGHTER'S KIT

(4) CBR-D MASKS & SUITS

(5) DESMOKING KIT

(6) OBA'S

FLOODING CONTROL (DRY RUN) Al, A2, B2, B3

(1) AIRBAG

(2) INNER TUBE

(3) BOX PATCH & SHORING

(4) FOLDING PLATE

(5) PLUGS

FLOODING CONTROL (HOSE)

(1) AIRBAG

(2) INNER TUBE



(5) PLUGS

FLOODING CONTROL (TANK)

(1) AIRBAG

(2) INNER TUBE



(5) PLUGS

CUTTING ACCESS HOLES

Al, A2, B2, B3

Al, A2, B2, B3

C4

AS LAY 3

AS LAY 3

AJ- LAY 3

A5 LAY 3

A7 LAY 3

AJ LAY 2

P4 DAY 2

PI DAY 1

P6 LAY 2

P3 LAY 3

A2 DAY 2

TEST SEQUENCE

TEST NO. TITLE

1 1

12 r:-:s-.^F- ^^= —•

(1) 36" x 3o" CZLL

(2) 48" x 43" CSLL

INTERIOR SKC'RING

TEST c^r.T.

A2

B3

A2

VENTILATION IN CELLS A2 13

ADVANCED DOUBLE HULL (ADH) - DC TESTS TEST

NO. 1

SSQL-srcS

^. -.. „ a-IO FAY 3

F5 CAY 2

26

1. TITLE: AIR TESTING WATERTIGHT INTTEGRITY

2. CELLS: C1

3. STATEMENT OF TEST: Determine options for monitoring cell integrity.

4. TEST OBJECTIVE: Determine the most effective method of monitoring cell integrity.

- Option 1: Sealed cells; determine if maintaining a cell pressure of 2 PSI is feasible and if pressure sensors are practical.

- Option 2: Use standard Navy air test procedures, no test required

5. PREPARATION AND MATERIALS REQUIRED FOR SET-UP:

A MATERIALS & TEST AREA SET-UP

(1) One (1) 20" x 20" x 72" cell.

(2) One (1) 1 ^" pipe with air test fitting fill connection and modified LP air adapter attached to Cell C1.

(3) Two (1) 10" diameter bolted inspection covers for access.

(4) One (1) vent line with bleeder control valve for atmospheric (gas free) testing and mechanical pressure readout.

B EQUIPMENT

(1) One (1) Air Test Hose and Manifold if available or pressure gauge & shutoff valve

(2) Two (2) "/i' x 50' Air Hose w/ Quick Disconnect

(3) One (1) Installed Pressure Sensor

(4) One (1) Standard Air Test Manifold with Hoses and Control Valve

(5) LP Air supply

C. PERSONNEL

Setup:

Bob Humphrey John

Taggart

One person is required to conduct these tests. (1)

Bob Humphrey

D. RECORDING

(1) Video- Van Trinh

(2) Photos - Van Trinh

(3) Tape Recorder - Van Trinh/Dave Klinkhammer

(4) Notes/Sketches - Van Trinh/John Hadley

6. TEST PROCEDURES:

A. STEPS

27

(1) Install sensors and mechanical indicators in cells.

(2) Install air test fittings for conducting test, evaluating sensors, and recording data.

(3) Pressurize cell, evaluate ability for cell to hold pressure, bleed off air and verify operation of low pressure sensor/alarm.

C. SAFETY OBSERVER

(1) John Taggert

& OBSERVERS RECORD (1)

Evaluation Summary a. Determine whether 2 PSI pressure be maintained. b. Evaluate effectiveness of pressure sensor.

ADVANCED DOUBLE HULL (ADH) - DC TESTS TEST NO.

2A

1. TITLE: DEWATERING USING 1 1/2" EDUCTOR

2. CELL A1

3. STATEMENT OF TEST: Evaluate methods of dewatering ADH cells.

4. TEST OBJECTIVE: Determine effectiveness of a 1 1/2" eductor connected to a flooded cell's drain valve.


A MATERIALS

(1) One (1) A1 cell 48" x 48" x 8' long R

TEST AREA SET-UP

(1) Install V/i' drain valve connection at lower right side ofAl cell

(2) Confirm that ail drainage valves and openings are secured.

(3) Run V/2' x 50' water supply hose to cell viewport.

(4) Fill Cell A1 through viewport to viewport level.

C. EQUIPMENT

(1) One (1)1 Vi' Eductor

(2) Two (2) 2.72' x 50' Fire Hoses

(3) One (2) V/i' x 50' Fire Hoses

(4) Two (2) Spanner VWenches

D. PERSONNEL

Setup:

Bob Humphrey John Taggart

Four personnel are required for this test.

28

(1) Sam Belton

(2) Ken Carter

(3) Eric Cicmanec

(4) Greg Bielawski

E. RECORDING



(3) Tape Recorder - Dave Klinkhammer

(4) Notes/Sketches - Van Trinh/John Hadley/Dave Klinkhammer

6. TEST PROCEDURES: A.

STEPS

(1) Set up 1^2" eductor on lower deck level and connect V/i' drain valve

(2) Supply water from firemain to eductor.

(3) Run discharge hose return to well deck tank.

B SAFETY OBSERVER (1)

JohnTaggert C. OBSERVERS

RECORD

(1) Evaluation Summary a. Determine effectiveness/length of time required to dewater cell b. Determine length of time required to set up equipment.

ADVANCED DOUBLE HULL (ADH) - DC TESTS TEST NO. 2B

1. TITLE: DEWATERING USING 1 1/2" EDUCTOR

2. CEUJ B1

3. STATEMENT OF TEST: Evaluate methods of dewatering ADH cells.

4. TEST OBJECTIVE: Determine effectiveness of dewatering cells through access opening.


A. MATERIALS

(1) One (1) B1 cell 36" x 36" x 8' long

(2) One 21" manhole cover for vertical access from top of B4 cell

B TEST AREA SET-UP

(1) Confirm that all drainage valves and openings are secured.

(2) Run V/2' x 50' water supply hose to cell B1 viewport.

(3) Fill Cell A! through viewport to viewport level.

29

C. EQUIPMENTT

(1) One(1)r/2"Eductor

(2) Three (3) 272" x 50' Fire Hoses

(3) Two (2) V/2' x 50' Fire Hoses

(4) Two (2) Spanner Wenches

D. PERSONNEL

Setup:



(1) Sam Belton

(2) Ken Carter



E. RECORDING

(1) Video-Van Trinh



(4) Notes/Sketches - Van Trinh/John Hadley/Dave Klinknamms


A. STEPS

(1) Set up V/2' eductor on DC deck level and lower to Cell Bl through manhole on overhead of Cell B4

(2) Supply water from firemain to eductor.

(3) Run discharge hose return to well deck tank.

& SAFETY OBSERVER (1)

JohnTaggart C.

OBSERVERS RECORD

(1) Evaluation Summary a. Determine effectiveness/length of time required to dewater cell b.

Determine length of time required to set up equipment.


NO. 2C

1. TITLE: DEWATERING CELLS USING ELECTRIC SUBMERSIBLE PUMP AND

EDUCTOR

2. CELLS: A1, B1

30

3. STATEMENTT OF TEST: Evaluate methods of dewatering ADH cells. Conduct test in conjunction with test 2D.

4. TEST OBJECTIVE:

Determine effectiveness of the electrical submersible pump and the 1 1/2" eductor when dewatering cells through a sounding tube acting as a standpipe.


A MATERIALS

(1) One (1) A1 cell 48" x 48" x 8' long

(2) One (1) B1 cell 36" x 36" x 8' long

(3) Utilize installed V/z' pipe sounding tube with V/z' thread connection with cap on top of A3 and B4 cells.



(2) Run V/z' x 50' water supply hoses to cell B1 and cell A1 viewports.

(3) Fill Cells A1 and B1 through viewports to viewport level. (3)

Place reducer double female fittings on A1 and B1 sounding tubes.

C. EQUIPMENT

(1) One (1) Submersible Pump

(2) One (1) 1 1/2" Eductor

(3) Two (2) 75' Lengths of 440 Volt Electrical Cables

(4) Three (3) V^rning Signs - "Danger Electrical Shock"

(5) Twelve (12) Tie Ties

(6) Two (2) 2Vz' to V/z Double Female Fittings

(7) A1 Cell Test - Three (3) 2Vz' X 50' Fire Hoses

B1 Cell Test - Two (2) 2Vz' X 50' Fire Hoses

D. PERSONNEL

Setup:


Taggart


(1) Sam Belton

(2) Ken Carter



E. RECORDING





31

6. TEST

PROCEDURES:

A. STEPS

(1) Set up submersible pump on overhead of Cell B4

(2) Set up eductor on overhead of Cell A4

(3) Run 440 volt supply cable to sub-pump.

(4) Connect 1 Vi' eductor to A1 and B1 stand pipes.

(5) Run discharge hose returns to well deck tank.

(6) Activate sub pump and eductor

B SAFETY OBSERVER


C. OBSERVERS RECORD

(1) Evaluation Summary a. Determine effectiveness/rate of dewatering using subpump. b. Determine effectiveness/rate of dewatering using eductor. c. Determine length of time required to set up both equipment configurations.


2D

1. TITLE: DEWATERING USING DOWNFLOODING TECHNIQUES

2. CELLS: A3

3. STATEMENT OF TEST: Evaluate methods of dewatering ADH cells. Conduct test in conjunction with test 2C.

4. TEST OBJECTIVE: Determine effectiveness of downflooding to dewater cells.


A MATERIALS

(1) One (1) A3 Cell 48" x 48" x 12' long

(2) Downflooding valves in cells A2 and A3

BL TEST AREA SET-UP


(2) Run 1^2" x 50' water supply hose to cell A3 viewport.

(3) Fill Cell A3 through viewport to viewport level.

32

C. EQUIPMENT

(1) Two (2)172" Eductors

(2) Four (4) 172" x 50' Fire Hose

(3) Four (4) 272" x 50' Fire Hose

(4) Two (2) double 1 1/2" female couplings

D. PERSONNEL

Setup:



(1) Sam Belton

(2) Ken Carter



E. RECORDING

(1) Video-Van Trinh

(2) Photos - Van i rinh


(4) Notes/Sketches - Van Trinh/John Hadley/Dave KJinkhammer

6. TEST

PROCEDURES: A

STEPS

(1) Downflood from Cell A3 to Cell A1 by opening downflooding valves on A3 and A2.

(2) Attach 1 1/2" double female coupling to A1 drain valve and rig eductor.

(2) Run discharge hose to well deck tank.

(3) Apply firemain pressure to eductor and monitor dewatering.

& SAFETY

OBSERVER (1)

JohnTaggert


(1) Evaluation Summary a. Determine effectiveness/practicality of downflooding techniques. b. Determine effectiveness/rate of dewatering using eductor connected to Cell A1 drain valve . c. Determine length of time required to set up equipment.


NO. 3

33

1. TITLE: FIREMAJN ACCESS

2. CELLS: A1.A2,A3,B4

3. STATEMEm" OF TEST:

Evaluate accessibility of ADH cells for DC maintenance and emergency repair. Conduct this test prior to running Test 4.


Determine whether there is sufficient access for maintenance and repairs to the firennain, if there is a limit to the size of piping that can be installed in the different sized cells, and whether the valves and piping systems should be located outside ADH cells.


A. MATERIALS

(1) Three (3) A size cells 48" X 48" X 12' long

(2) One (1) B4 cell 36" X 36" X 8' long

(3) Valve operator for firemain piping in A3 and B4 cells


(1) Remove access plates to cells.

(2) Assemble tools as required.

C. EQUIPMEI^T

(1) One (1) Pipe VWench

(2) One (1) Open End W-ench

D. PERSONNEL

Setup:


Taggart

Four personnel are required for this test. (1)

Sam Belton

(2) Ken Carter



E. RECORDING





34


A STEPS

(1) Remove access plates to gain access to cell, piping and valves.

(2) Use tools to simulate maintenance and repair.


(1) JohnTaggert


(1) Evaluation Summary a. Determine if there is sufficient access to piping and valves to conduct maintenance and repair. b. Determine the maximum size of piping that can be run through each size cell and still allow sufficient access for maintenance and repair. c. Determine whether piping and valves should be run outside ceils.


NO. 4

1. TITLE: PIPE CUTTING, JUMPERING AND PIPE REPAIR

2. CELLS: A3, B4

3. STATEMEhfr OF TEST:

Evaluate access to piping for application of pipe patching clamps or materials, pipe cutting, and installation of emergency jumpering fittings. This test should be conducted after Test 3 has been completed.


Determine access and space needed around vital piping systems to allow for repairs and installation of emergency jumpering systems fittings and emergency pipe repair.


A. MATERIALS

(1) One (1) 6" firemain pipe (6 ft) length for A3 cell.

(2) One (1) 2 1/2" firemain pipe (6 ft) length for B4 cell.

(3) One (1) A3 cell 48" x 48" x 12' long.

(4) One (1) B4 cell 36" x 36" x 8' long

& TEST AREA SET-UP

35

(1) Run one (1) 2 72" x 50' water supply hose to wyegate - run two (2)

172" x 50' firehose to fire main pipe in A3 and B4 cells.

(2) Gain access to A3 and B4 cells through forward end manhole covers on top of cells.

C. EQUIPMEI^T

(1) One (1) 2 72" x 50' Fire Hose

(2) Two (2) 1 72" x 50' Fire Hoses

(3) Two (2) 1 72' Spanner W-ench

(4) Two (2) 4" flanges

(5) One (1) 12" Combination Adjustable Wrench

(6) One (1) File, Course

(7) One (1) File, Fine

(8) One (1) pipe cutter

'.S) One (1) legate 2'/2" to Two (2) V/i' Connecrions ^0) Two

272" x' 2'^Jumper Hoses

(11) Welding Machine, leads

(12) Welding jacket, helmet and gloves

D. PERSONNEL

Setup:



(1) Sam Belton

(2) Ken Carter


(4) Greg Bieiawski

E. RECORDING





6. TEST PROCEDURES: A

STEPS

(1) Set up fire main supply to pipes and pressurize.

(2) Break out pipe patching kit and patch pipes under pressure.

(3) Isolate firemain.

(4) Cut out section of pipes in Cells A3 and B4

(5) Use jumper connections to repair piping and pressurize to test repair.


John Taggert

C. OBSERVERS RECORD (1)

36

Evaluation Summary a. Determine ability of personnel to apply pipe patches in cells. b.

Determine ability of personnel to cut out sections of piping in cells. c. Determine ability of personnel to install pipe jumper connections.

ADVANCED DOUBLE HUUL (ADH) - DC TESTS TEST

NO. 5A - STEEL

1. -nTLE: FLOATING DECK, STEEL AND PNEUMATIC SHORING

2. CELLS/DECKS: F1, F2, D1, HI, A2, B2

3. STAT^MENTr OF TEST: Determine options of using shoring with floating decks. Do in conjunction with 5b, 6a, and 6b.


Determine the impact that floating decks have on shoring procedures, and verify whether: a. steel shoring is effective b. pneumatic shoring is effective


A MATERIALS

(1) Decks HI, F2, F1.D1

(2) Cells B2 and A2

(3) One (1) Control Valve

(4) Two (2) Air Bags

(5) Two (2) %" x 50' Air Hoses connected to LP air supply.


(1) Remove steel deck F2.

(2) Set up two air bags under floating deck.

(3) Inflate bags with air.

(4) Place steel deck in place (F2).

(5) Glue or weld steel shoring anchor points in place (Test 6a).

C. EQUIPMENTT

(1) Two (2) Steel Shores 3' x 5'

(2) Four (4) Steel Shores 6' x 11 '

(3) Two (2) Mauls (6.7 Ibs each)

(4) Two (2) pneumatic shores

(5) One (1) hydraulic jack

(6) Two (2) wood shores 4" x 4" x 10'

D. PERSONNEL

37

Setup:


Taggart


(1) Sam Beiton

(2) Ken Carter



E. RECORDING





6. TEST

PROCEDURES: A.

STEPS

(1) Construct "I" shoring using the telescopic steel shoring between decks F2 and HI, and D1 and F1.

(2) Construct "I" shoring using the pneumatic shoring between decks F2 and HI, and D1 and F1.

(3) Brace the interior of Cell B2 by installing a 3' x 5' steel shore in a horizontal direction, then construct "K" type shoring using the telescopic steel shoring between decks F2 and HI, supporting Cell B2.

(4) Simulate a floating deck moving downward by releasing the air in the air bags under deck F2.

(5) Simulate a floating overhead moving upward by jacking up deck F1 using the hydraulic jack and a wooden shore. B

SAFETY OBSERVER (1) John Taggert


(1) Evaluation Summary a. Evaluate the ease with which the different types of shoring structures are erected. b. Evaluate the stability of the shoring structures under the movements imposed on Decks F1 and F2. c. Evaluate the success of the different anchor points.


NO. 5B - WOOD

1. TITLE: FLOATING DECK, WOOD SHORING

2. CELLS: F1, F2, D1, HI, A2, B2

3. STATEMENT OF TEST:

Determine options of using shoring with floating decks. Do in conjunction with 5a

5a and 6b.

38


Determine the impact that floating decks have on shoring procedures, and whether wood shoring is effective.


A. MATERIALS

(1) Decks HI, F2, F1.D1

(2) Ceil A2

(3) One (1) Control Valve

(4) Two (2) Air Bags

(5) Two (2) VA ' x 50' Air Hoses connected to LP air supply.


(1) Remove steel deck F2.

(2) Set up two air bags under floating deck.

(3) Inflate bags with air.

(4) Place steel deck in place (F2).

(5) Glue, epoxy, wood shoring anchor points in place (Test 6b).

C. EQUIPMENT

(1) One (1) Shoring Tool Kit

(2) Two (2) Mauls (6.7 Ibs each) " •

(3) Six (6) Wood Shores 4" x 4" x 10'

(4) Twelve (12) Lag Bolts 5/8" x 5^"

(5) One (1) Power Driver

(6) Six (6) Wood Sholes

(7) One (1) hydraulic jack

D. PERSONNEL

Setup:


Taggart


(1) SamBelton

(2) Ken Carter



E. RECORDING





6. TEST

PROCEDURES: A.

39

STEPS

(1) Construct "I" shoring using wood shores between decks F2 and HI, and D1 and F1.

(2) Brace the interior of Cell A2 by installing a 3' x 5' steel shore in a horizontal direction, then construct "K" type shoring using wood shores between decks F1 and D1, supporting Cell A2.

(3) Simulate a floating deck moving downward by releasing the air in the air bags under deck F2.

(4) Simulate a floating overhead moving upward by Jacking up deck F1 using the hydraulic Jack and a wooden shore. &

SAFETY OBSERVER (1) John Taggert


(1) Evaluation Summary a. Evaluate the ease with which the wooden shoring structures are erected. b. Evaluate the stability of the wooden shoring structures under the movements imposed on Decks F1 and F2. c. Evaluate the success of the different anchor points.


6A STEEL

1. TITLE: FLOATING DECK, STEEL ANCHOR POINTS

2. CELLS: D1, F1, F2, HI, C1, C2

3. STATEMENT OF TEST: Install anchor points to support shoring of decks, bulkheads and the hull.


Determine the effectiveness of various methods for installing steel shoring anchor points for both ADH cells and floating decks.


A. MATERIALS (2) Decks HI,

F2, F1.D1


(1) Prepare designated deck areas for welding or bonding anchor points. C. EQUIPMENTT

40

(1) One (1) 1 lb Can Adhesive

(2) Two (2) steel Shoring Sholes (Anchor Points)

(3) Welding Machine, leads

(4) Welding jacket, helmet and gloves

D. PERSONNEL

Setup:


Taggart

Four personnel are required for this test. (1)

Sam Belton

(2) Ken Carter

(3) Eric Cicmanec (^) Greg

Bieiawski

E. RECORDING






STEPS

(1) Install steel anchor points and strongbacks in designated locations using water compatible quick drying adhesive.

(2) Weld steel anchor points and strongbacks in designated locations.


John Taggert


Evaluation Summary a. Evaluate ease and practicality of the two different methods of anchor point installation. b. In conjunction with tests 5a and 5b, evaluate the effectiveness of the anchor points.

ADVANCED DOUBLE HULL (ADH) - DC TESTS TEST NO. 6B

WOOD

1. TITLE: FLOATING DECK

41

2. CELLS: D1,F1,F2,H1

3. STATEMENTT OF TEST: Install anchor points to support shoring of decks, bulkheads and the hull.


Determine the effectiveness of various methods for installing wooden shoring anchor points for both ADH cells and floating decks.


A. MATERIALS (2) Decks HI

,F2,F1,D1


(1) Prepare designated deck areas for bonding wood anchor points.

C. EQUIPMENT

(1) One (1) 1 lb Can Epoxy Adhesive

(2) Two (2) wood Shoring Sholes (Anchor Points)

D. PERSONNEL

Setup:



(1) Sam Belton

(2) Ken Carter



E RECORDING






STEPS

(1) Install wood anchor points and strongbacks in designated locations

42

using water compatible quick drying adhesive.


John Taggert


Evaluation Summary a. Evaluate ease and practicality of the wood anchor point installation. b. In conjunction with tests 5a and 5b, evaluate the effectiveness of the anchor points.


7 (OPTIONS 1 & 2)

1. TITLE: EMERGENCY ESCAPE TRUNK

2. CELLS: El

3. STATEMENT OF TEST: Utilize ADH cell space for escape routes and DC re-entry routes.


Determine if it is feasible for personnel to both escape from lower deck compartments to safe areas above the 'V' lines, and regain access to damaged compartments using the following sized cells: Option 7-1: 48" x 48" cells E cells Option 7-2: 36" x 36" cells B cells


A. MATERIALS

Option 7-1

(1) 48" x 48" x 12' (A Cell)

Option 7-2. (1) 36" x 36" x 12'

(B Cell)


( 1 ) Assemble equipment

Option 7-1

(1) None required

Option 7-2 (1) None required

C. EQUIPMENT

43

(1) One (1) FFE

(2) One (1) OBA

(3) One (1)1 1/2" hose

(4) One (1) 2 1/2" hose

(5) Additional equipment if time allows

D. PERSONNEL

Setup:


Taggart


(1) Sam Belton

(2) Ken Carter



E. RECORDING






A. STEPS Conduct for

Option 7-1

(1) Personnel will egress from bottom of El to top of El wearing personnel protective equipment as provided.

(2) Personnel will reenter top of Cell El and climb down to bottom of El wearing protective equipment and carrying DC gear as assigned, simulating reentering a mishap area.

Conduct for Option 7-2

(1) Personnel will egress from bottom of B1 to top of B4 wearing personnel protective equipment as provided.

(2) Personnel wll reenter top of Cell B4 and climb down to bottom of B1 wearing protective equipment and carrying DC gear as assigned, simulating reentering a mishap area.


John Taggert

C. OBSERVERS RECORD (1) Evaluation

Summary a. Measure time for personnel to egress b. Determine whether personnel can reenter cells with DC equipment for both options. c. Record time for personnel to reenter cells with DC equipment.

44


NO. 8 (OPTIONS 1-6)

1. TITLE: DISTRIBUTIVE DC EQUIPMENTT STOWAGE

2. CELLS: G1

3. STATEMENTT OF TEST: Utilize the ADH cell for stowage of DC equipment.

4. TEST OBJECTIVE: Determine the feasibility of damage control equipment stowage in cells.


A MATERIALS

(1) 48" x 48" x 48" cell (G1).

(2) Six (6) 2" x 4" x 4' pieces of lumber


(1) Assemble equipment as noted in the options below.

(2) After equipment has been stowed in the 48" x 48" cell, use lumber to simulate a 36" x 36" storage cell.

C. EQUIPMEI^T

Option 8-1 One (1) Shoring Kit Option 8-2 One (1)

Dewatering Kit Option 8-3 Six (6) Firefighter's Kits

Option &4 Twenty (20) CBR masks and CPO suits

Option 8-5 One (1) Desmoking Kit Option 8-6 Six (6)

OBA's Option 8-5 Rescue equipment, Jaws of Life,

Exothermic Torch

D. PERSONNEL

Setup: Bob Humphrey

John Taggart


(1) Sam Belton

(2) Ken Carter



45

E RECORDING






A STEPS

(1) For both the 48" x 48" and 36" x 36" cell, and for each of the equipment options, perform step 2.

(2) Place various pieces of DC equipment in cell and determine feasibility and practicality of rapid removal and restoration

R SAFETY OBSERVER



(1) Evaluation Summary a. Evaluate the feasibility and practicality of stowing and efficiently removing DC equipment for both sized cells and for all equipment options. b. Measure the time required to remove the DC gear from the cells for each of the options.


9A (OPTIONS 1-5)

1. TITLE: BATTLE DAMAGE AND FLOODED CELLS-DRY RUN

2. CELLS: A1, A2, B2, B3,


Examine and explore various methods of controlling and stopping flooding resulting from damage to ADH cells. Apply temporary repairs to holes in ADH cells.

4. TEST OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the following methods of controlling flooding through damaged ADH cells:

Option 9-1 Airbag Option 9-2

Inner Tube Option 9-3 Box Patch with shoring Option 9-4 Folding

Plate Option 9-5 Plugs


A MATERIALS

(1) Ship service LP air

(2) Two (2) 48" x 48" x 12' cells

46

(3) Two (2) 36" x 36" x 8' cells


(1) Assemble equipment in test area. C.

EQUIPMENT

(1) Option 9-1 One (1) Hurst Bag

(2) Option 9-2 One (1) Inner Tube

(3) Option 9-3 One (1) Box Patch with Shoring

(4) Option 9-4 One (1) Folding Plate

(5) Option 9-5 One (1) Damage Control Plugging Kit consisting of:

One (1) Tool Box

One (1) Plug Bag

Two (2) Maul 6.7 Ibs

D. PERSONNEL

Setup:


Taggart

Four personnel are required for th's test.

(1) Sam Belton

(2) Ken Carter



E. RECORDING






STEPS

(1) For this dry run, execute the battle damage procedures for each of the options, checking the feasibility, practicality, and fit of the DC equipment without actually having water in the cells.

B. SAFETY OBSERVER (1)

John Taggert

C. OBSERVERS RECORD ( 1 ) Eval uation Summary a.

Evaluate the feasibility of each of the DC options.

ADVANCED DOUBLE HULL(ADH) ~ DC TESTS TEST NO.

47

9B (OPTIONS 1-5)

1. TITLE: BOTTLE DAMAGE AND FLOODED CELLS-FIRE HOSE FLOODING

2. CELLS: A1, A2, B2, B3,


Examine and explore various methods of controlling and stopping flooding resuiting from damage to ADH cells. Apply temporary repairs to holes in ADH cells.



Inner Tube Option 9-3 Box Patch with shoring Option 9^ Folding



A. MATERIALS


(1) Two (2) 48" x 48" x 12' cells

(2) Two (2) 36" x 36" x 8' cells

(3) Two (2) flood simulator box patches with regulator valve and hose connection


(1) Assemble equipment in test area.

(2) Rig water supply to holes in hull in A1, A2, B2, and B3 Cells.

C. EQUIPMENT




(4) Option 9-4 One (1) Folding Plate





D. PERSONNEL

Setup:

48

Bob Humphrey

John Taggart


(1) Sam Belton

(2) Ken Carter



E. RECORDING






A. STEPS

(1) Turn on water supply to flood simulator box patches

(2) Attempt to control and stop the flooding using each of the options.


(1) JohnTaggert


Evaluation Summary a. Evaluate the effectiveness of each of the flooding control techniques. b. Record the amount of time needed to install each of the flooding control options.


9C (OPTIONS 1-5)

1. TITLE: BATTLE DAMAGE AND FLOODED CELLS-WATER TANK

2. CELLS: A1,A2,B2,B3,


Examine and explore various methods of controlling and stopping flooding resulting from damage to ADH cells. Apply temporary repairs to holes in ADH cells.



Inner Tube Option 9-3 Box Patch with shoring Option 9-4 Folding


49


A. MATERIALS


(1) Two (2) 48" x 48" x 12' cells

(2) Two (2) 36" x 36" x 8' cells

(3) Two (2) flood simulator box patches with regulator valve and hose connection

(4) Two (2) fire connections supply pipes in A1 and A2 cells


(1) Assemble equipment in test area.

(2) Fill water tank in ADH mockup

C. EQUIPMENT




(4) Option ^4 One (1) Folding Plate





D. PERSONNEL

Setup:


Taggart


(1) Sam Belton

(2) Ken Carter



E. RECORDING






A. STEPS

(1) Open the flood simulator box patches to allow water from the water tank to flow into the ADH cell.

(2) Attempt to control and stop the flooding using each of the options.


50



(1) Evaluation Summary a. Evaluate the effectiveness of each of the flooding control techniques. b. Record the amount of time needed to install each of the flooding control options.


NO. 10

1. TITLE: CUTTING ACCESS HOLES IN DOUBLE DECK

2. CELLS: C4

3. STATEMENT OF TEST: Cut an opening 12" in diameter for fire venting.


To determine if current exothermic torch is adequate to cut holes through double hull main decks, identify difficulties and develop new techniques for cutting holes.


A MATERIALS

(1) One (1) 20" X 20" X 6' long "C" cell


(1) Open access on one (1) 20" X 20" X 6' long "C" cell

C. EQUIPMENT

(1) PECU Kit (22" & 36" rods, apron, gloves, face shield)

(2) Fire watch equipment (CO:) bottle, gloves, eye protection)

D. PERSONNEL

Two personnel are required for this test.

(1) Sam Belton

(2) . Eric Cicmanec (Fire Watch) •

E. RECORDING




51



A. STEPS

(1) Use access plats on uoper dick to gain access to and cut lower deck us;ng the PECU.

(2) Determine if there are clearance difficulties cutting through the lower half of the deck.

(3) Cut a hole through both the upper and lower deck of the cell.

& SAFETY OBSERVER

(1) JohnTaggert C. OBSERVERS RECORD (1) Evaluate ability to cut through double cells, record time to cut through cells.


NO. 11

1. TITLE: ACCESS AND PERSONNEL RESCUE FROM ADH CELLS

2. CELLS: A2,B3

3. STA7EMENTT OF TEST:

Test for ability to access cells for conducting damage control evolutions and ability to rescue personnel from cells.


To determine if there is sufficient access room to conduct damage control evolutions and determine how to remove injured or unconscious personnel from a cell.

- Option1:36x36"x8'Bcell

- Option 2: 48 x 48" x 8' A cell

- Option 3: 48 x 48" x 8' A2 cell with backboard


A. MATERIALS

(1) One 36" x 36" x 8' long "B" cell

(2) One 48" x 48" x 8' long

52


(1) Remove access to cells.

(2) Set up ventilation in cells.

(3) Place dolly in cells. (Tie rope to dolly)

(4) Fans for ventilation.

C. EQUIPMEf^fT

(1) Dolly, with 15 ft rope attached

(2) Vîst belt, with 15 ft rope attached

(3) Dummy

(4) Box Fan

(5) Ladders

D. PERSONNEL

Four personne! are required for this tests.

(1) Sam Belton


(3) Ken Carter


E. RECORDING





6. TEST PROCEDURES: A. STEPS (both options 1 and 2)

(1) Put on waist belt and enter cell through access opening.

(2) On dolly move up and down the cell simulating repair actions.

(3) Simulate injured person on dolly, pull back to access and remove.

(4) Simulate injured person not on dolly, pull back to access and remove.


JohnTaggart C. OBSERVERS

RECORD

(1) Evaluate ability to access cells for repair of systems in cells.

(2) Evaluate ability to rescue injured person for cell, record time to remove.


NO. 12

53

1. TITLE: INTTERIOR SHORING (IN CELLS)

2. CELLS: A2

3. STATEMENTF OF TEST: Examine various methods of rigging shores within cells.


To determine if there is sufficient access room to conduct damage control evolutions and evaluate alternate methods if required.


A MATERIALS

(1) One (1) 3' x 5' Steel Shore

(2) One ( 1) 4" x 4" x 3'5" Wooden Shore

(3) Two (2) 172" x 4" x 10" Wooden Wedge

(4) One (1) 12" x 12" x 4" steel Box Patch

(5) One (1) 4" x 4" x 3' Strongback


(1) Assemble materials in test area.

C. EQUIPMEI\TT

(1) Shoring Tool Kit D.

PERSONNEL

Set up

(1) Bob Humphrey -


Two personnel are required for this tests.


(2) Ken Carter

E. RECORDING


NO. 13

1. TTTLE: VENTILATION IN CELLS

2. CELLS: A2

3. STATEMENTr OF TEST: Examine and determine the

54

best method of ventilating cells.


To determine if there is sufficient access room to conduct damage control evolutions and evaluate alternate methods if required.


A MATERIALS

(1) One (1) Box Fan

(2) One (1) Ram Fan

(3) One (1) Red Devil Blower

(4) Two (2) 8" x 5' Vent Ducts

(5) Four (4) r/2" x 50' Fire Hoses

(6) One (1) Darley Pump


(1) Place Box Fan in 21" MHC or 18" x 26" MHC as required, attach with

Bungi Straps.

(2) Run power cable to 115 volt.

(3) Attach Ram Fan vent duct to 10" diameter vent openings, secure with tie ties. Rig two V / T .' X 50' fire hoses to the inlet connection and discharge connection Ram Fan. Connect inlet hose to Darley Pump, run discharge hose back to ADH tank.

(4) Pig Darley Pump to take suction from ADH tank.

(5) Attach two 8" x 15' vent ducts to Red Devil Blower and attach one 10" diameter vent opening on A2 cell.

C. EQUIPMENT D.

PERSONNEL

Set up (1) Bob Humphrey


Two personnel are required for this tests.

(1) EricCicrnanec


E. RECORDING






55

A STEPS

(1) In A2 Cell determine most appropriate and effective means of ventiiation.

B. SAFETY OBSERVER

(1) John Taggart C. OBSERVERS RECORD (1)

Evaluate various methods of ventilating cells.

56

SAFETY FOR

DAMAGE CONTROL TESTS

A. PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT

Personnel will be issued appropriate personnel protection clothing and equipment upon arrival on SHADWELL. This equipment will be properly stowed within the repair locker station number four. Double Hull repair personnel will work out of Repair 4 and the ADH DC Locker.

B. SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Prior to every test, a walk through should be performed to Identify deficiencies with equipment and to allow for basic familiarization and orientation in the cell/floating deck where testing is to be conducted. During this time the team should be encouraged to discuss the test, how to best attack it and make recommendations/suggestions for how to obtain the best performance and efficiency from the team. This walk through will allow an outstanding opportunity to perform test related training. The pre-test walk through should include:

- Thorough description/discussion of the tests.

- Team outfitting in required clothing.

- Entry to the cell/floating deck with all equipment needed.

- Simulation of actions.

- Exit from the cell.

2. At the end of every test there should be a "lessons learned" discussion/debrief. Particular attention should be paid to any problems encountered with equipment or procedures. Action items to correct known deficiencies should be written at this time.

3. Specific guidelines must be established and enforced, by the on site safety teams, to allow for termination of tests when appropriate. Every effort must be made to prevent an actual casualty.

C. SAFETY REQUIREMENTS FOR EVERY TEST

1. Following are MANDATORY Safety requirements for each test;

- There will be one safety observer when personnel are in cells.

- Personnel participating in all tests must wear safety equipment, if necessary.

- Electrical gloves must be worn by personnel using electrical equipment during tests.

Safety goggles must be worn where eye hazards are present.

2. In performance of these tests, lift and carry limitations for individuals could be easily exceeded. Care must be taken by the Team leader regarding assignment

57

of personnel to specific tasks.

3. Adequate sizes and quantities of Personnel Protective Equipment must be immediately available. Damage Control Fire Fighting Clothing, OBA's, gloves, boots, etc, tend to run large and will be required by potentially larger number of smaller stature personnel.

4. Team members must demonstrate the ability to don, fit test and operate an

OBA prior to use in any test where is it required.

F. HUMAN FACTOR REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH TEST

- Review test plan to identify hazards.

- Inventory repair locker equipment to ensure adequacy/quantity to support testing.

- Inventory PPE, paying particular attention to sizes and quantities.

- Brief proper lifting techniques for moving heavy objects.

- Determine if safety lines are required in the test area.

- Two personnel must handle equipment weighing over 42 lbs.

NOTE: ALL TEAM MEMBERS SHOULD BE THOROUGHLY FAMILIAR WITH THE

IDENTIFICATION, SET UP AND USE OF EACH PIECE OF EQUIPMENT

THAT WILL BE USED IN A GIVEN TEST. THIS IS ESSENTIAL TO THE

SAFE PERFORMANCE OF THE TESTS AND TO ACCURATELY

DETERMINING TIME REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE OF

PARTICULAR TASKS.

1. HULL PLUGGING. This is a flooded cell test. The test requires the use of a plugging kit bag that weighs 59 pounds. Two persons should be assigned to carry this bag to the casualty area. Once to the cell, the team leader should be able to assign any task to any person without fear of exceeding lift/carry limitations. Care must be taken to assure that the actual area requiring repair is within the overhead reach limits of the person assigned to perform the task

(floating deck test).

2. SHORING. This test will involve the use of several pieces of relatively heavy pieces of equipment ranging in weight from 26 to 53 pounds. Since combined male/female lift and carry limits of 42 pounds are exceeded with the 4" x 4" x 10" pieces of shoring material (53 pounds each) and due to their length, 2 persons should be assigned to carry them. EXTREME CARE WILL BE NECESSARY ON

LADDERS. The 11' steel shore also nears lift limits and would be better handled by 2 persons.

58

3. PIPE PATCHING. This function requires the use of material that is relatively light in weight. NOTE: Team members should be cautioned that this procedure/kit requires the use of protective gloves.

59

TABLE OF CONTENTS - maritime DC & PPE Information Center

ADVANCED DAMAGE CONTROL

TEST PLAN

1999

Damage Control Engineering

Test Facility (DCETF)

Naval Reserve Center

Fort McHenry

1201 Halsey Place

Baltimore, Maryland

Prepared for:

Naval Sea Systems Command SEA 03L4

Related documents

Products

Support

TABLE OF CONTENTS - maritime DC & PPE Information Center

ADVANCED DAMAGE CONTROL

TEST PLAN

1999

Damage Control Engineering

Test Facility (DCETF)

Naval Reserve Center

Fort McHenry

1201 Halsey Place

Baltimore, Maryland

Prepared for:

Naval Sea Systems Command SEA 03L4

Related documents

Add this document to collection(s)

Add this document to saved

Suggest us how to improve StudyLib