ET613 Syllabus Design of Distributive Learning Environments Fall 2011 INSTRUCTOR Linda Lohr, Ed.D. Professor of Educational Technology McKee Hall, Room 501 University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO 80639 Voice: 970 351 25135 ~ FAX: 970 351- 1622 E-Mail: linda.lohr@unco.edu Website: http://bb.unco.edu (ET613) OFFICE HOURS: As needed. FYI 970 351 2807 COURSE GOAL To help you conceptualize distributive education and apply that understanding to the design, development and implementation of distributive learning environments. COURSE DESCRIPTION Provides students with knowledge and experiences in designing, developing and delivering distance-learning experiences. Using instructional design as a foundation, the course covers the fundamental principles that make distributive learning experiences effective. TEXTBOOK E-learning and the Science of Instruction, Ruth Clark and Richard Mayer, second edition. A downloadable version of the text is located on Amazon.com and is less expensive than a print-based text. Keyleigh Gurney, Ed. Tech office manager OBJECTIVES Objective 1: Lead unit discussion topic, 25% of your grade, 120 points total. For each unit you will lead a discussion of a chapter topic. You will select the chapter topic in class one week prior to the discussion. Your discussion will: Summarize critical information (approximately 10 - 15 minutes) Elaborate chapter content in a way that teaches you and others, as in finding and sharing an example, an interpretation, another source of information (perhaps an article, website, interview, or some idea of your own) Provide a learning activity that allows class members to mentally rehearse the topic (approximately 15 minutes). This can include, but is not limited to: visualizations, blog or wiki building. The purpose of the activity is to find ways to help others understand. Objective 2: Participate in chapter discussions led by class members, 25% of your grade, each class 10 points for a total of 120 points. This participation includes the development of a multiple-choice question related to another class member’s lesson, held during the previous session. Objective 3: Create the interface and shell for an online Blackboard class with a team of up to three people, 25% of your grade, 120 points. Your team will: Select a topic or work with an existing course Write a high-level syllabus (you can use this one as an example) 20 points Design the interface to accommodate information presentation, practice, and assessment - 60 points Create one lesson/unit. You must include a minimum of one objective, one presentation strategy, one practice strategy, and one assessment strategy. You may use any software you like (Softchalk, PowerPoint, Spicy Nodes, Comic Life, iMovie …). Objective 4: Exam 25% of your grade, 12 points. One mid-term and one final exam, each worth 60 points and covering assessment items from Objective 1 2 UNITS The first half of each class will be devoted to Objectives 1 and 2. The second half of each class will be devoted to Objective 3 (with the exception of October 18 for the midterm exam Unit 1, part 1, Chapter 1, Overview August 30, 2011 Memorable definition of e-learning Name: _Fatima__ (the what, how, and why of e-learning) and two types of E-learning analysis (performance, task) E-learning development process and Name: _Nariman _ the difference in perform/inform goals Potential pitfalls of e-learning Unit 1, part 2, Chapter 1: continued Name: _Michael__ September 6, 2011 Near and far transfer goals Name: __Amani___ Directive, receptive, and guided architectures Name: _Fatma__ Media research summary Name: __Ping__ Other Name: _______________ Unit 2, part 1, Chapter 2, learning: Metaphors for e-learning (the three metaphors and their contributions, positive and negative) Mental selection, organization, and integration processes Cognitive load theory and types of load (extraneous, essential, generative) Selection, organization, integration methods September 13, 2011 Name: Fatima_ Name: _Michael___ Name: Nariman Name: Ping Unit 2, part 2, Chapter 2: learning (continued) September 20, 2011 E-learning research- what is good? Name: Amani Identifying relevant research and Name: __Fatma types of research Interpreting research - effect size Name: Hadid______ 3 Unit 3, Chapter 3: Multimedia principle September 27, 2011 Multimedia principle defined/described Name: Amani (Ping question) Psychological reasons for Name: Fatma (Hadid question) Multimedia principle examples Name: Fatima (Michael question) Evidence Name: Nariman (Fatima question) Animations and multimedia Name: Michael (Nariman question) What we don’t know Name: Hadid (Fatmah question) Other Name: Ping (Amani question) Unit 4, Chapter 4 & 5: Contiguity & Modality principle October 4, 2011 Contiguity principles Name: Fatma (Fatima ques) Modality principles Name: Fatima (Nariman ques) Psychological reasons for Name(s): Nariman (Michael ques) Contiguity & modality examples Name: Michael (Hadid ques) Evidence Name: Hadid (Ping ques) What we don’t know Name: Ping (Amani ques) Other Name: Amani (Fatma ques) Unit 5, Chapter 6 & 7: Redundancy & Coherence principle October 11, 2011 Redundancy principle defined/described Name: Nariman (Amani) Coherence principle defined/described Name: Michael (Fatma) Psychological reasons for Name: Hadid (Fatima) Redundancy and Coherence examples Name: Ping (Nariman) Evidence Name: Amani (Michael) What we don’t know Name: Fatma (Hadid) Other Name: Fatima (Ping) 4 Unit 6, Chapter 8: Personalization Principle October 18, 2011* Mid-term exam Personalization principle defined Name: Hadid (Ping) Psychological reasons for Name: Ping (Amani) Personalization examples Name: Amani (Fatma) Evidence Name: Fatima (Nariman) What we don’t know Name: Nariman (Fatima) Other1 Name: Michael (Hadid) Other 2 Name: Fatma (Michael) Unit 7, Chapter 9 : Segmenting & pre-training October 25, 2011 Amani Fatma Fatima Nariman Michael Hadid Ping Segmenting defined/described Name: Amani (Nariman) Psychological reasons for Name: Fatma (Michael) Segmenting pre-training examples Name: Fatima (Hadid) Evidence Name: Nariman (Ping) What we don’t know Name: Michael (Amani) Other 1 Name: Hadid (Fatma) Other 2 Name : Ping (Fatima) Unit 8, Chapter 10: Worked examples November 1, 2011 Defined/described Name: Fatma (Amani) Worked Example Principle 1 Name: Fatima (Fatma) Worked Example Principle 2 Name: Nariman (Fatima) Worked Example Principle 3 Name: Michael (Nariman) 5 Worked Example Principle 4 Name: Hadid (Michael) Worked Example Principle 5 Name: Ping (Hadid) Other Name: Amani Unit 9, Chapter 11: Practice (Ping) November 8, 2011 Defined/described Name: Fatima (Ping) Practice principle 1 Name: Nariman (Hadid) Practice principle 2 Name: Michael (Nariman) Practice principle 3 Name: Hadid (Michael) Practice principle 4 Name: Ping (Amani) Practice principle 5 Name: Amani (Fatma) What we don’t know Name: Fatma (Fatima) Unit 10, Chapter 12: Collaboration November 15, 2011 Defined/described Name: Nariman (Fatima) Collaboration topic 1 Name: Michael (Nariman) Collaboration topic 2 Name: Hadid (Michael) Collaboration topic 3 Name: Ping (Hadid) What we don’t know Name: Amani (Ping) Other Name: Fatma (Amanu) 1 Other 2 Unit 11, Chapter 13: Learner Control Name : Fatima (Fatma) November 22, 2011 Defined Name: Michael (Hadid) LC topic 1 Name: Hadid (Amani) LC topic 2 Name: Ping (Fatma) 6 LC topic 3 Name: Amani (Ping) What we don’t know Name: Fatma (Nariman) Other Name: Fatima (Michael) 1 Other 2 Amani Fatma Fatima Nariman Michael Hadid Ping Unit 12, Chapter 14: Building Thinking Skills Name: Nariman (Fatima) November 29, 2011 Defined Name: Hadid (Fatma) Thinking skills topic 1 Name: Ping (Fatima) Thinking skills topic 2 Name: Amani (Nariman) Thinking skills topic 3 Name: Fatma (Michael) Thinking skills topic 4 Name: Fatima (Ping) Thinking skills topic 5 Name: Nariman (Hadid) What we don’t know Name: Michael (Amani) Final Exam, December 6 RELATED STANDARDS Apply appropriate instructional or performance interventions (AECT: 1.3, 1.4; ISTE: V ABC; CDE: 3) Develop educational materials that incorporate audio, video, print, distance and computer based formats (AECT: 2, ISTE: III) Develop skills in working with and leading teams (AECT: 4, ISTE: V) Applied and evaluates instructional systems design processes in a variety of contexts (AECT: 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 5.2, 5.3; ISTE: II ABCDE, III ABC, IV ABC, V ABC; CDE: 3) Exhibit ethical behavior in data collection and analysis (AECT: 5.2.2) 7 GRADING 93 % = A 90 - 92 % = A86 – 89 %= B+ 83 – 85 %= B 80 – 82 %= B76 – 79 %= C+ 73 – 75 %= C 70 – 72 %= C66 – 69 %= D+ 63 – 65 %= D 60 – 62 %= DBelow 60 %= F Students with disabilities who believe they may need accommodations in this class should contact the Disability Access Center (970-351-2289) as soon as possible after the start of class to better ensure that such accommodations are implemented in a timely fashion. Academic Honesty: It is expected that members of this class will observe strict policies of academic honesty and will be respectful of each other. Any instances in which cheating including plagiarism and unauthorized use of copyrighted materials, computer accounts, or someone else’s work is determined will be referred to Student Services and will be investigated to its full extent. 8