The Emerging Markets Symposium

advertisement
The Emerging Markets Symposium
Opinion Paper on Healthcare Education, Training and Labor Market Issues
K. Srinath Reddy, M.D., D.M. (Card), M.Sc, FAMS
President
Public Health Foundation of India
Krishna D. Rao, Ph.D.
Head, Health Economics and Finance
Public Health Foundation of India
The Emerging Markets Symposium
Opinion Paper on Healthcare Education, Training and
Labor Market Issues
-
K. Srinath Reddy and Krishna D. Rao, Public Health Foundation of India
Introduction
As some of the countries are traditionally classified as ‘developing’ accelerate their
economic growth and earn the label of ‘emerging markets’, their performance in the
area of health care merits close scrutiny. This is not only because of the health care
needs within those countries, which need to be addressed efficiently, but also because
these health care markets have an increasing connectivity with the health care markets
of the more developed as well as less developed economies. This connectivity is
especially evident in the case of the health workforce, whose mobility is both an
indicator of a dynamic market as well as a cause for concern about the adverse
consequences for national health systems. We profile India as an illustrative case study
of some of the key characteristics of this conundrum.
Health workforce challenges in India
The health sector in India faces several critical challenges despite significant
achievements since Independence. While the country has made substantial strides in
economic growth, its performance in health has been less impressive. An important
reason for this is the inability of the health system to provide health care for all. Despite
an extensive network of government funded clinics and hospitals providing low cost
care, curative health services in India are largely provided by the private sector and
serve those who are socio-economically better-off. An unfortunate consequence of this
is that fee-for-service private provision dominates the curative care market putting an
enormous financial burden on households, particularly the poor - around 70% of health
spending is out-of-pocket1. Further, out-of-pocket payments for health care is
responsible for 4% of the population falling into poverty2. The lack of qualified health
workers in rural areas has been a long standing concern, as a consequence of which
many in rural areas are forced to seek care from providers of dubious capability.
Reforming the health sector has never been as critical as it is today.
Many of the issues facing India’s health sector today and the failure to provide universal
primary health care can be traced to distortions in the area of human resources for
health. India faces a shortage of qualified health workers. Analysis based on the 2001
Census indicates that the estimated density of all health workers (qualified and
unqualified) in India is about 20% less than the WHO norm of 2.5 workers (doctors,
nurses and midwifes) per 1000 population, meaning that there is a substantial shortage
of qualified health workers in the country. The large geographic variations in the health
workforce, across states and rural and urban areas, are important challenges in
Government of India. 2005. Report of the National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health. Ministry
of Health and Family Welfare.
2 Selvaraj S and Karan A. 2009. Deepening health insecurity in India: evidence from national Sample
Surveys since the 1980s. Economic and Political Weekly. vol xliv no 40
1
reforming India’s health workforce policies. The disparity between urban and rural
areas is particularly significant - urban areas account for less than a third of India’s total
population but are home to a majority (60%) of health workers3. Similarly, the
concentration of health workers in the private sector is also a cause of concern, mainly
due to the large number of vacancies in the public sector which has taken up the role of
providing quality health services in underserved areas.
There are important distortions in the production of health workers in India. While
there has been an increase in medical colleges in the last decade, it has mostly been due
to an increase in private medical colleges in the southern states. Overall, the production
capacity of doctors (and nurses) is much higher in states with better health indicators
and this reflects the distorted distribution of the country’s production capacity of health
workers. Private medical colleges also place a heavy burden of fees on students and
their admission procedures are not transparent. The curricula of medical schools, both
public and private, are not designed for producing ‘social physicians’ as envisioned in
the Bhore (1946) and other Committees. Rather, the training they provide is better
suited to the problems of urban India and for employment in corporate hospitals.
Nurses constitute an important but neglected cadre of India’s health workforce. Despite
their tremendous potential for providing health services to underserved areas, they
remain underutilized. Nurses continue to have a low position in the health workforce
hierarchy, while in other countries nurse-practitioners have elevated the practice and
stature of nursing. Nursing education is also in a state of crisis with many nursing
institutes being under-staffed and private institutes providing poorly trained nurses.
The adverse nurse-doctor ratio of 0.8 remains a matter for serious concern. Nurses can
deliver many of the basic clinical care and public health services, particularly at the
community level, at a lower cost than trained physicians.
Professional councils such as the Medial Council of India, the Indian Nursing Council,
and the Pharmacy Council have been set up by Government Acts to regulate the practice
of their respective professions, including education. However, many of these councils
serve as little more than lobby groups for their members and have not served India’s
health goals well. Further, the existence of these different regulatory bodies, each
responsible for important cadres of health workers, fails to provide a synergistic
approach to addressing the human resources needs of the country. There is an urgent
need for innovation in health related education which encourages cross connectivity
across disciplines and categories of health workers. The Indian health system stands to
benefit tremendously from the generation of new cadres and competencies that can
actively meet the health needs of the country. The broad vision of human resources, in
terms of the quantity, composition and quality required for enabling the country’s
health system to provide health care for all, is hidden from the limited perspectives of
these individual regulatory bodies.
Determining human resource needs: planning or the market?
Rao KD, Bhatnagar A and Berman P. 2009. India’s health workforce – size, composition and distribution.
India Health Beat. Vol 1, 3. Downloaded from www.hrhindia.org.
3
The low number of qualified health workers (e.g. doctors, nurses, paramedics) in rural
areas reflects the failure of the labor market. Both the private sector and public sector
have been unable to place qualified health workers in rural areas. Supply side market
interventions like increasing the number of medical colleges to increase production of
doctors and nurses, while important, is not likely to solve the human resources
problems such as workforce mal-distribution because of a variety of factors influence
employment choice. For instance, there is a strong demand for specialization among
doctors with a basic degree in medicine; however, once they specialize there is little
incentive to undertake rural services. Further, several institutional constraints in the
recruitment of health providers into the government system prevent the active filling of
vacancies. Certain planning (i.e. non-market) mechanisms, like compulsory rural service
medical students, which are being proposed in India, are unlikely to be successful in
overcoming this problem.
Lasting solution to this problem most likely lies in an appropriate mix of planning and
market strategies according to the context. In India a variety of market and planning
mechanisms are being used to address workforce shortages in rural areas. Broadly,
these include:
Market mechanisms
 Education incentives:
o Reservation for post-graduate studies in medicine in Tamil Nadu (e.g.
Tamil Nadu)
o Paying the cost of MBBS degree (e.g. Meghalaya)

Monetary and non-monetary compensation:
o Higher salary to serve in remote areas (e.g. Himachal Pradesh,
Uttrakhand)
o Locating doctors centrally in remote areas so that they and their families
can live in comfortable surroundings even though their posts are in
remote areas (e.g. Uttarakhand)

Public-private partnerships:
o Contracting out of PHCs to NGOs which are then responsible for providing
services (e.g. Karnataka)
o Contracting in of doctors and other health workers (almost all states)
Planning mechanisms

Workforce management:
o Direct recruitment of doctors to regular positions by the health ministry,
bypassing the traditional Public Service Commission (e.g. Haryana)

Creating cadres of service providers which can replace allopathic doctors and
other health workers at the primary care level:
o Rural Medical Assistants (3-year doctors) in place of allopathic (MBBS)
doctors at PHCs (e.g. Assam, Chhattisgarh)
o ‘Sputum microscopists’ in place of lab technicians at PHCs (e.g.
Uttrakhand)
o AYUSH doctors in place of allopathic (MBBS) doctors at PHCs (almost all
states)
The different strategies listed above reflect local context specific solutions to the
problem of getting health workers to rural and remote areas. They include a mix of
planning and market mechanisms which different states in India have come up with to
remedy the health workforce issues they are facing.
Primary health care and training
The basic degree in medicine (MBBS) in India does not train doctors to serve the
primary care needs of the country, particularly for rural service. The content of the
MBBS is to prepare students who will be at par in their training with medical students
in developed countries. Further, students are not interested in simply acquiring an
MBBS degree – they want to specialize. Once they specialize they have a very low
probability of wanting to serve at the primary care level.
In this regard, it is critical that medical students are trained in primary health care and
have exposure to serving in rural areas even if it is for a limited period. However, simply
requiring this will not solve the human resource problem. From a training perspective,
the structure of the medical degree will have to be changed so that the public health
goal - of having physicians trained in primary health care and serving in rural areas, and the aspirations of medical students to specialize are both met. Possibilities in this
direction include:
o Scrap the MBBS degree and have a direct MD during which students put in
rural service at the primary care level for a limited period.
o Emphasize primary health care in the MBBS, including posting at PHCs, but
make it much easier for students to specialize in their subject of choice after
serving some time at the primary care level.
Migration of health workers and its control
Many emerging countries are a source of human resources to developed countries. The
table below shows the major donors and recipients involved in the trade of health
workers.
Major donors
Major recipients Both donor& recipient
India, Pakistan
US
UK
Sri Lanka, Philippines
UK
Germany
South Africa, Nigeria
Canada
Canada
Ghana, UK, Canada
Australia
Germany, New Zealand
Germany
Source: JLI, Harvard University
In India, firm numbers on how many doctors nurses migrate abroad is not available.
However, estimates based on smaller studies indicate that a substantial number of them
migrate and this is growing. The effect of this migration on availability of health
workers within the country is unclear. On one hand there is a loss of health workers and
also the public investment made in them through subsidized education. However, it is
unclear if migration in is responsible for shortages of health workers in rural areas or in
the public sector in India. These shortages are the result of many factors, not just
migration. Further, migrant workers are an important source of foreign exchange
remittances.
If we accept that migration of health workers is not a benefit and should be regulated,
there are several strategies to do this short of banning the migration of health workers:
o Change the language of instruction from English to local languages so that
Indian doctors are not competitive abroad: In Thailand, the medium of
instruction in medical and nursing schools is in Thai. This prevents Thai
physicians and nurses from participating in foreign job markets.
Implementing such a policy in India would be problematic for several
reasons. Many students entering medical school have been through English
medium schools and will find it very difficult to cope with teaching in a local
language, as would the faculty. A larger issue is of which local language
should be used as the medium of instruction. Most states in India have their
own language and some have multiple languages spoken. If each state adopts
a different language of instruction, then the medical graduates will be limited
to working within that state and will not be a resource for the entire country.
Further, the language issue is a sensitive one in India and any move to
promote a certain language in medical education will have repercussions
beyond that of medical education.
o Introduce work abroad as an incentive for rural service: Allow health
workers the opportunity to serve in lucrative foreign markets if they have
served in-country, particularly in underserved areas, for a certain period of
time.
Meeting domestic health workforce needs with foreign health workers
In several industries in India (e.g. airlines), the lack of locally available qualified human
resources is supplemented by foreign trained professionals. However, the health sector
presents some particular challenges in closing the human resource gap in this manner,
particularly for primary health services in rural areas. At the primary health care level,
it is unlikely that a foreign health worker would be accepted by the community or be
able to function due to language and cultural issues. Even posting a nurse/doctor from
Tamil Nadu in a PHC in Punjab will bring up the same problems. Specialist foreign
doctors coming to work in India is a more likely possibility. However, again it is
questionable if they will be willing to fill vacancies in the public sector especially at
Community Health Centers and District Hospitals. Further, the added problem of
bringing in foreign health workers is that their qualifications are often not recognized
by professional councils in India. The different professional councils recognize a very
limited number of foreign degrees and this makes it difficult for foreign trained health
workers to participate in the Indian market.
The most feasible solution to the bridging the human resource challenges in India is to
be self-sufficient in health worker needs. This need not mean that one must simply
increase production (though this can be a solution), but there are several possibilities of
doing more with the health workforce that we have. These alternatives include:
o Task shifting in which tasks/duties performed by one cadre of health worker
are shifted to another cadre(e.g. nurses providing primary care services
instead of doctors).
o Multi-skilling (e.g. nurses/paramedical staff become skilled in primary care)
o Alternative cadres of health workers (AYUSH physicians, 3-year doctors)
o Making underserved areas more attractive for service through monetary and
non-monetary incentives.
Should India undertake planned export of health workforce?
India presently has the largest number of young persons in the world and will continue
to maintain a young demographic profile over the next four decades. It has the potential
to contribute to the expansion of the workforce in many sectors, not only within the
country but also globally. Such a potential exists for the health workforce too. Two types
of external markets can be supplied, with varying demands of skill sets. Developed
countries may prefer to import highly skilled professionals, suitable for employment in
their sophisticated and technology intensive health care settings. Less developed
countries may require health professionals trained for delivering health care in low
resource settings.
Market mechanisms alone may not be able to address this dual demand, apart from
failing to correct the problem of internal maldistribution within India, for reasons
elucidated above. Planned production of a potentially exportable surplus of health
workers may help to streamline this process. The government could contract with
developed countries, to undertake planned and externally financed production of highly
skilled health professionals and use a part of the revenues for producing health workers
for primary health care workers for India and other developing countries. India could
also undertake training of health workers from interested low and middle income
countries, within India or by establishing educational and training institutions in those
countries. This too could be facilitated by a combination of planning and market
mechanisms, with the Government acting both as an enabler and as a regulator. While
these possibilities exist, the primary concern of India, over the next two decades, would
remain the adequacy of health workforce in the domestic primary health care services.
Conclusions
It is critical that emerging market economies like India comprehensively address the
human resource challenges they face for universal health care to become a reality. The
poor performance of health is not only contributing to a waste in the human workforce
but is also holding back economic growth. The route to health care for all from a human
resources point of view, in our opinion, does not lie exclusively in the market or in the
planning domain. Either approach has its benefits and limitations. Preference of one
over the other should be driven by the context where the problem is occurring. This is
exactly what is happening in India with different states attempting to address the
human resource challenges they are facing by trying a variety of context specific market
and non-market approaches. Further, India should not attempt to solve her human
resource problems by poaching from less developed countries or by banning the
outflow of health workers. There are several strategies which can be employed to
optimize the use of existing human resources or to add to those which are currently
available.
Download
Related flashcards
Economic theories

19 Cards

Economic theories

23 Cards

Public economics

17 Cards

Economists

20 Cards

Create flashcards