CH 26 – Special Relativity Special relativity is a theory that describes the properties of matter at speeds near the speed of light. It was developed by Albert Einstein and published in 1905. At speeds small compared with the speed of light ordinary Newtonian mechanics is extremely accurate in describing motion, but it fails at very high speeds. Special relatively is valid for all speeds. Frames of Reference When making physical observations, the frame of reference of the observer is important. A basic assumption, called the principle of Galilean relativity, is that the laws of mechanics are the same in all frames of reference that are moving with respect to one another at a constant velocity. A frame of reference in which Newton’s laws are valid is called an inertial system. All frames of reference moving at constant velocity with respect to an inertial system are also inertial systems. As an example, consider two coordinate systems that are moving at constant velocity with respect to each other. If system A is an inertial system, then to an observer at rest in A, an object at rest which experiences no net force will forever remain at rest (Newton’s first law). To an observer in B the object would be moving at constant velocity. It would also experience no net force and would forever remain in its state of constant motion (again, Newton’s first law). But then let’s consider a third coordinate system, C, which is accelerating with respect to coordinate systems A and B. An observer at rest in coordinate system C would see the object accelerating (in a direction opposite to the direction of acceleration of C with respect to A and B). Thus, Newton’s first law would not appear to apply. In Galilean relativity, velocities transform by simple vector addition. For example, suppose a man standing in a train car throws a ball with a speed of 30 m/s as measured in the train. If the train is moving in the direction of the ball’s motion with a speed of 50 m/s, then an observer at rest beside the train track observes the ball to be moving at a speed of 80 m/s. This simple velocity addition rule works fine until the speeds begin to approach the speed of light. For example, if the ball were thrown at a speed of 0.5c and the train were moving at a speed of 0.8c, this would suggest that the stationary observer would see the ball moving at a speed of 1.3c, which is greater than the speed of light. In special relativity, no objects can travel faster than the speed of light. Galilean relativity would also mean that the speed of light would depend on the observer. For example, if the man in the moving train car were to shine a light in the direction of motion of the train, then if he were to measure the speed of the light as c, the stationary observer would measure the speed to be c + v, where v is the speed of the train. This is in 1 conflict with the theory of special relativity which says that the speed of light is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion. Michelson-Morley Experiment Mechanical waves require a medium for propagation. Sound, for example, can’t propagate in a vacuum. According to Galilean relativity, the speed of sound that one measures depends on the motion of the medium (e.g., air) relative to the observer. For example, in still air the speed of sound is about 340 m/s. If the air is moving at a speed of 30 m/s, then the speed of sound measured by a stationary observer would be between 310 m/s and 370 m/s, depending on the direction of the sound with respect to the moving air. In the 19th century it was believed that light also required a medium for propagation. Since it was known that light could propagate in a vacuum (e.g., from the sun to the earth), this medium was thought to have unusual properties and to be difficult to detect. It was referred to as a luminiferous ether. It was believed that the earth moved though this ether as the earth orbited the sun. So, if the speed of light was c if measured by an observer at rest with respect to the ether, then it would be different if measured by an observer at rest on the earth and would depend on the direction of the light with respect to the motion of the ether (or the motion of the earth in the ether). In the late 1800’s two scientists, Albert Michelson and Edward Morley, performed a series of experiments to try to detect the presence of this ether. Their apparatus shown here is now referred to as the Michelson-Morley interferometer. 2 The apparatus essentially measures the difference between the speed of light parallel and perpendicular to the ether. A monochromatic light source is split by a half-silvered mirror into two beams moving in mutually perpendicular directions. The beams are reflected back through the half-silvered mirror, recombined, and observed. If there is an ether wind, then the speeds of these two mutually perpendicular beams should differ, giving a slight phase shift between them and a slight change in intensity when recombined. These measurements are analogous to measuring the time for a boat to travel directly across a river and back, versus the time for the boat to move the same distance down and up the river. The crossing speed would be c 2 v 2 , whereas the speed down and up the river would be c v , where c is the speed of the boat relative to the water (or light relative to the ether) and v is the speed of the water (or ether) relative to earth. The results of the Michelson and Morley experiments were null. That is, no difference could be measured for the speed of light between any two mutually perpendicular directions. This provided evidence that an ether did not exist Postulates of Relativity Einstein made two postulates on which he based his theory of special relativity: 1. The principle of relativity: The laws of physics are the same in all frames of reference moving at a constant velocity with respect to one another. 2. The constancy of the speed of light: The speed of light is the same to all observers. The first postulate is basically the same as the Galilean principle of relativity. The second postulate is at odds with the Galilean transformation of velocities between two inertial frames. For example, in the case of a person shining a flashlight on a moving train, it would mean that if the train were to travel at 0.9c, then instead of the groundbased observer measuring the speed of the light as c + 0.9c = 1.9c, he would still measure the speed to be c. Simultaneity The concept of simultaneity – whether two events occur at the same time – is important when comparing measurements made in two different inertial systems. If the speed of light is the same in all moving coordinate systems, this means that events that occur simultaneously in one system may not be observed as being simultaneous in another coordinate system. 3 An example is illustrated in the figure below. An observer O’ stands in the middle of a moving boxcar and an observer O stands at rest beside the track. When the positions of the observers coincide, a lightning bolt strikes each end of the boxcar, leaving marks on the ground and marks on each end of the boxcar. The light from the lightning strikes at A and B reach observer O at the same time, so observer O concludes that the lightning strikes occurred simultaneously. But to observer O’ in the moving boxcar, the lightning strikes do not appear to occur at the same time. The light traveling from A’ to O’ travels further than the light from B’ to O’. Because of the motion, O’ moves toward the incoming beam from B’ and away from the incoming beam from A’. So to observer O’ the strike at B’ appeared to occur before the strike at A’. Time Dilation One consequence of the constancy of the speed of light is that moving clocks run slower. In the figure above a light clock consists of a laser beam being reflected from the roof of a boxcar of height d. The time interval of the clock is the time for the beam to go up and back down. To an observer at rest in the boxcar, this time interval is 4 t p 2d . c This time is referred to as the ‘proper’ time since the clock is at rest with respect to the observer and the time interval is measured between two events, sending and receiving the laser pulse, that occur at the same position to the observer. To an observer at rest beside the track, the light must travel at an angle to reflect from the moving roof and back to the moving observer. Thus, it travels a greater distance and the time interval is longer. During the time t/2 that it takes for the light to reach the roof, the boxcar has traveled a distance vt/2. The distance the light travels is given by 2 ct vt 2 d 2 2 If we square both sides of this equation and solve for t, we get t 2d / c 1 v2 / c2 Comparing this expression with that for tp, we see that t t p t p , 1 v2 / c2 where 1 2 1 v / c 2 . Example: An astronaut travels to a distant planet with a speed of 0.5c. According to his clock, the trip takes one year. How long does the trip appear to take to an observer on earth? Solution: The time measured in the spacecraft is the proper time since the clocks in the spacecraft are at rest with respect to the astronaut. So, 5 t t p 2 1 v / c 2 1 yr 1 ( 0.5 ) 2 1.15 yr How fast would the astronaut have to travel so that the travel time was two years to the earth observer? t 2t p t p 1 v2 / c2 1 v2 / c2 1/ 2 1 v2 / c2 1/ 4 v 0.866c Length Contraction Time dilation leads to the concept of space contraction. Consider an observer in a rocket ship traveling with speed v from earth to a distant planet. To an observer at rest on earth, this distance is Lp = vt. The distance the observer measures is considered the proper length, Lp, since it is the length of something that is at rest with respect to the observer. (The planet is at rest with respect to the earth.) The time that the earth observer measures for the trip, t, is not the proper time since the two events that are timed, leaving earth and arriving at the planet, do not occur at the same position. Now the guy in the rocket ship measures the time for the trip as tp. This would be considered the proper time since two events occur at the same position with respect to him. He sees the planet as moving toward him with speed v, and he is measuring a moving length, L. So, L p vt and L vt p Using the time dilation formula relating t and tp, we obtain L Lp 1 v2 / c2 Lp . Thus, an object moving with respect to an observer appears have its dimension in the direction of the motion shortened. 6 Example: A meter stick zips by you with a speed of 0.9c. The length of the stick is along its direction of motion. How long does it appear to be? Solution: L L p 1 v 2 / c 2 1m 1 ( 0.9 )2 0.44 m Muon decay in the earth’s atmosphere Evidence of time dilation and space contraction has been obtained by measuring the number of muons in the earth’s atmosphere as a function of elevation. Muons are unstable particles that are produced in the earth’s atmosphere by the collision of highenergy cosmic rays with atmospheric molecules. They are created in large numbers at an altitude of about 4,800 m with enough energy to travel close to the speed of light. When at rest they have a half-life of 2.2 s and decay into an electron (or positron) and two neutrinos. A particle with a speed c would travel in 2.2 s a distance d = (3 x 108 m/s)(2.2 x 10-6 s) = 660 m. This would mean that the muons should never reach the surface of the earth. However, a considerable number of muons do indeed reach earth. So, how is this possible? The result can be explained by time dilation. To an observer at rest on earth, the half-life of the moving muons is larger by an amount that depends on their speed. If their speed was v = 0.99c, then the half-life observed by someone on earth would be t t p 2 1 v / c 2 2.2s 1 ( 0.99 ) 2 16 s So, the person on earth would calculate the distance traveled by the dying muon to be d’ ct = (3 x 108 m/s)(16 x 10-6 s) = 4,800 m, so they would reach the surface of earth before decaying. An alternative view is that the muon sees the distance to earth contracted because of the motion of the earth respect to the muon. The contracted distance would be d d' 1 v 2 / c 2 ( 4800 m ) 1 ( 0.99 )2 660 m 7 Twin Paradox The concept of motion is relative to the observer. So when thinking about time dilation, a person at rest on earth would say that the clocks in a moving spacecraft run more slowly. But on the other hand a person in the spacecraft could say that he was at rest and the person on earth was moving and say that the earth clocks were running more slowly. Actually, both observers are correct. A conflict would appear to arise if the space traveler were to go on a long trip and return back to earth so they could compare their clocks. This situation occurs in the so-called twin paradox. In the twin paradox, at age 20 twin Speedo leaves earth in a spacecraft for a round trip to Planet X while twin Goslo stays behind on earth. The planet is 20 light-years from earth and the spacecraft travels with a speed of 0.95c. What are the ages of the twins when Speedo returns? To Goslo the time of travel is t 2d / v 2( 20 c yr ) /( 0.95c ) 42 yr (Note: A light year is the distance that light travels in one year. So 1 light-yr = speed x time = 1 c x yr.) Goslo perceives Speedo’s time of travel to be shorter, so he determines that Goslo has aged by t p t / t 1 v 2 / c 2 ( 42 yr ) 1 ( 0.95 )2 ( 42 yr )( 0.31 ) 13 yr However, one might think that Speedo could consider that he was as rest and Goslo was moving, so that Goslo aged by 13 yrs and Speedo aged by 44 yrs. However, when applying the concepts of relativity, we must compare inertial frames of reference. Goslo is in a fixed inertial frame of reference, whereas Speedo is in one inertial frame going and a different inertial frame returning. Thus, Goslo’s calculations are correct. Upon Speedo’s return, Speedo is 33 yrs old and Goslo is 62 yrs old. Another way to envision this is that from Speedo’s point of view the distance that he has to travel to Planet X is less than 20 light-years because of space contraction. The distance he travels is d' d 1 v 2 / c 2 ( 20 c yr )( 0.31 ) 6.2 c yr So the time for him to travel to Planet X and back is t p 2d' / v 2( 6.2 ) / 0.95 13 yr 8 Velocity Addition In Galilean relativity it is possible for velocities to add such that objects can exceed the speed of light. In special relativity, the addition rule for velocities makes this impossible. Consider a spaceship (system 2) moving at a speed v21 with respect to an observer at rest on earth (system 1). If an observer at rest in the spaceship fires a projectile (object 3) with speed v32 relative to the spaceship, then the speed of the projectile as measured by the earth observer is v31 v32 v21 1 v32 v21 / c 2 Example: A space ship is traveling at 0.9 times the speed of light relative to earth. A person in the space ship fires a projectile in the direction of travel with a speed of 0.8c. What speed does a person on earth measure for the speed of the projectile? Solution: We have v21 = 0.9c and v32 = 0.8c. Using the velocity addition formula, we have v31 0.9c 0.8c 1 ( 0.9c )( 0.8c ) / c 2 1.7c 0.99c 1.72 If we used the Galilean transformation rule, we would have v31 = 0.9c + 0.8c = 1.7c, which would exceed the speed of light. Example: A space ship is traveling at 0.9 times the speed of light relative to earth. A person in the space ship fires shines a flashlight in the direction of travel. What speed does a person on earth measure for the speed of the light from the flashlight? Solution: v 0.9c c 1 ( 0.9c )( c ) / c 2 1.9c c 1.9 This is in agreement with the second principle of relativity that says that all observers measure c for the speed of light. 9 Relativistic Momentum In the special theory of relativity, linear momentum is given by p mv 2 1 v / c 2 mv If we use the classical definition of momentum, which is p = mv, then momentum is not conserved in high speed collisions. The relativistic momentum approaches infinity as the speed of a particle approaches the speed of light. Example: A proton travels at a speed of 0.9c. Compare its relativistic and classical momenta. Solution: pcl mv ( 1.67 x10 27 kg )( 0.9 3x108 m / s ) 4.51x10 19 kg m / s prel 4.51x10 19 kg m / s 1 ( 0.9 )2 1.03 10 18 kg m / s So the relativistic momentum is more than four times what one would calculate using the incorrect classical definition. Note that if the speed is small compared with c, then 1 and both formulas give approximately the same result. Relativistic Energy Classically, kinetic energy is given by KE = ½ mv2. The relativistic formula for kinetic energy is KE mc 2 1 v2 / c2 mc 2 mc 2 mc 2 The quantity mc2 is the rest mass energy, E0 mc 2 . So we can think of mc2 as the total energy, 10 E mc 2 mc 2 1 v2 / c2 The kinetic energy and the total energy of a particle approach infinity as its speed approaches the speed of light. This means that it is impossible to accelerate a particle with finite mass to the speed of light. Example: An electron has a speed of 0.8c. What is its kinetic energy? Solution: mc 2 KE 1 v2 / c2 mc 2 ( 9.11x10 31 kg )( 3x108 m / s )2 1 ( 0.8 ) 2 ( 9.11x10 31 kg )( 3x108 m / s )2 1.37 x10 13 J 8.2 x10 14 J 5.5 x10 14 J For comparison, the classical expression for KE would give KE 1 mv 2 1 ( 9.11x10 31 kg )( 0.8 x3x108 m / s )2 2.62 x10 14 J 2 2 Example: Repeat the above calculations for v = 0.1c. Solution: KErel ( 9.11x10 31 kg )( 3 x108 m / s ) 2 1 ( 0.1 ) 2 ( 9.11x10 31 kg )( 3 x108 m / s ) 2 4.13 x10 16 J KEcl 1 ( 9.11x10 31 kg )( 0.1x3 x108 m / s )2 4.10 x10 16 J 2 In this case the classical result and the relativistic results are nearly the same. 11 Example: Calculate the rest mass energy of the electron in electron volts. Solution: An electron volt is the kinetic energy that an electron would acquire if accelerated through a potential difference of 1 volt. This energy is eV, where e = 1.6 x 10-19 C and V = 1 volt. That is, 1 eV = (1.6x10-19C)(1V) = 1.6x10-19 J Then E0 ( 9.11x10 31 kg )( 3 x108 m / s )2 8.20 x10 14 J ( 8.20 x10 14 J )( 1ev / 1.6 x10 19 J ) 5.11x105 ev 511 kev Example: Find the kinetic energy released in the fusion reaction given below: 3 2 4 1 2 He 1D2 He 1H The rest mass energies of the nuclei are 3 2 He : 2 ,809.4 Mev 2 1 D : 1,876.1 Mev 4 2 He : 3,728.4 Mev 1 938.8 Mev 1H : Solution: E mHe 3c 2 mD c 2 mHe 4c 2 mH c 2 2809.4 1876.1 3728.4 938.8 18.3 Mev 12 Relativistic Energy and Momentum Relationship From the expressions for the relativistic energy and momentum, an expression relating the two can be obtained. The result is E 2 p 2 c 2 ( mc 2 )2 Pair Production For a photon, m = 0, so E pc Since for a photon E = hf, we have p E hf h c c Pair Production and Pair Annihilation A photon with sufficient energy can be converted into a particle-antiparticle pair if the photon energy exceeds the rest mass energy of the pair. In order to conserve momentum, the conversion must take place near a massive particle, such as a nucleus, that can absorb the excess momentum of the photon. The antiparticle of an electron is a positron, which has the mass of an electron and a positive charge. A proton antiparticle has the mass of a proton and a negative charge. Thus, in pair production charge is conserved. Example: What photon wavelength is required to produce a proton-antiproton pair? Solution: The rest mass of a proton is 938 Mev. Thus E 2mc2 2( 938 ) 1876 Mev 1876 Mev 1.6 x10 13 J / Mev 3.0 10 10 J hc ( 6.6 x10 34 J s )( 3x108 m / s ) 6.6 x10 16 m 10 E 3.0 x10 J 13 In pair annihilation, a particle combines with its antiparticle and two or more photons are produced. (If only one photon were produced, then momentum would not be conserved.) Pair Annihilation Example: An electron and a positron with nearly zero kinetic energies annihilate and two photons are produced. What is the energy and wavelength of each photon. Solution: In order to conserve momentum, each photon must have the same momentum and thus the same energy. The energy of each photon would be E mc 2 (9.11x10 31 kg)(3x108 m / s) 2 8.20 x10 14 J 511 kev and their wavelength would be hc ( 6.6 x10 34 J s )( 3x108 m / s ) 2.4 x10 12 m 14 E ( 8.2 x10 J) 14