CG5. Climate change and the greenhouse gases extension sheet. Vicky Wong. Page 1 of 2 Climate change and greenhouse gases extension sheet For each of the questions below, ensure that you explain your answer fully. You have looked at data about the temperature of the Earth measured by satellite and by thermometer and at data about the change in concentration of greenhouse gases. The furthest back the data goes is to the mid-1600s which is about 350 years. This is a very long experiment, but when the age of the Earth is considered it is a very short length of time. Question 1 Looking at the data you have seen so far, does the evidence support a firm conclusion that the earth is experiencing unusual climate change? To help support the conclusions we need to know about the temperature of the Earth further back in time. There are no direct measurement experiments that we can look at so a new way of determining the temperature at a given time needs to be found. Question 2 Can you think of anything which scientists could use to help them to discover what the temperature was hundreds, thousands and even millions of years ago? Recently, leading scientists have also tried to answer this question. Their search for a longer temperature record has taken them to some of the most isolated and remote places on Earth such as the depths of the middle of the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and the ice and snow of Greenland and Antarctica. The scientists are applying an idea that the ‘father of geology’, James Hutton, had in the 1700s. In the 1700s James Hutton from Edinburgh realised that the key to understanding the future of the planet was by investigating the past. James Hutton was the first man to study the rocks and realise that the Earth was millions of years old. He introduced the idea of geological time, and used fossils to learn about previous ages. Hutton’s ideas were very controversial at the time because in 1650 Archbishop James Ussher of Ireland completed his dating of the Earth using biblical evidence. Ussher declared that the world was created on the evening of October 22, 4004 BC, and was less than 6000 years old. Some people still believe this idea but it has no scientific validity. This should not be mistaken as evidence for or against the existence of a Creator of the Universe. Correlation and Causation There is a difference between correlation and causation. Different variables may follow the same pattern (correlation) but this does not necessarily mean that one variable causes the other to happen. For example In summer we tend to wear less clothing than in winter In summer we tend to eat more ice cream than in winter CG5. Climate change and the greenhouse gases extension sheet. Vicky Wong. Page 2 of 2 There is a correlation between wearing less clothing and eating ice cream, but this is not a causation. Wearing less clothing does not make you eat ice cream. There are 3 variables in the above: the season; the amount of clothing; what you eat. Changes in the season cause changes in the amount of clothing you wear Changes in the season cause changes in what you choose to eat Scientists can often find correlations but it is much harder to show a causation; a mechanism must be put forward to explain how one variable causes changes in the other. For example Smokers are more likely to suffer from lung cancer than those who do not smoke There is a correlation between smoking and lung cancer. Cigarette smoke contains over 300 toxic compounds including several carcinogens (cancer causing compounds.) It is now widely accepted that there is a causation because of the presence of the carcinogens. Question 3 What is the correlation between temperature and rate of reaction? What is the causation? Using the examples above, give an example of another correlation that you have come across in your studies of science and another example of causation. Question 4 From the data looked at so far, is there enough evidence to support a firm conclusion that climate change is caused by human activity? If so, what mechanism could be used to explain it? If not, what further evidence might be needed?