THE ANSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS convened for their
regular monthly meeting on Monday, September 12, 2011 beginning at 6:00 P.M. in the
Board Room, Suite 209 of the Anson County Government Center.
Commissioners present:
Anna H. Baucom, Chairman
Ross Streater, Vice Chairman
Bobby Sikes
Dr. Jim Sims
Claude Spencer
Jarvis Woodburn
Staff members present:
Lawrence R. Gatewood, County Manager
Bonnie M. Huntley, CMC, NCCCC, Clerk to the Board
Rita James, Data Processing
Robert Thomas, Finance Officer
Jennifer Baptiste, Planning
Scott Rowell, ACTS Director
Mike Sessions, Utilities Director
Jeff Waisner, Director Parks and Recreation
Ryan Teal, EMS/Safety Director
Marvin Deese, Inspector
Chairman Baucom called the meeting to Order, welcoming those present.
Chairman Baucom called on Ronnie Sullivan of Calvary Baptist Church for the
Invocation.
Approval of the Agenda by Commissioners: Chairman Baucom asked board
members to consider moving the closed session to directly after Item V Administrative
Matters. Chairman Baucom noted an important discussion was needed for Economic
Development and to consult with the attorney and felt this needed to be done early in
the meeting. Motion by Vice Chair Streater, seconded by Commissioner Spencer, to
approve the Agenda with the change. Motion carried unanimously.
Public Hearing: Chairman Baucom noted the Public Hearing was under the
guidance of our county planner Jennifer Baptiste on text amendment to the proposed
Zoning Ordinance. Motion by Commissioner Sims, seconded by Commissioner
Woodburn, to open the Public Hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
In the public hearing Ms. Baptiste noted that last month the approval of the map
for the Lanesboro/Burnsville area was on the agenda and the request was made by the
board to amend the R-2 zoning district with public water and sewer from one-half acre
to one acre. Ms. Baptiste stated that the planning board met last month and their
recommendation was not to change the minimum lot size from one-half acre to one
acre. Chairman Baucom asked if this was only on the lots that have county water and
sewer with Ms. Baptiste answering yes. Chairman Baucom asked Ms. Baptiste if they
don’t have water and sewer what was the lot size with Ms. Baptiste answering one and
one-half acres if they have water and if they don’t have public water or sewer it was
two acres. Commissioner Sims asked how many planning board members attended the
meeting with Ms. Baptiste answering they had six out of seven members present.
Chairman Baucom stated that the board would now have to make a decision to accept
the one acre or the one-half acre. Vice Chair Streater asked their reason for not
changing with Ms. Baptiste answering they felt one-half acre was sufficient for a lot
with public water and sewer and based on the fact that we have so few sewer lines in
the county they felt the time between having water and sewer was sufficient for
development that might come later. Commissioner Sims noted that you would need a
jack hammer to dig a hole in the Peachland and Burnsville areas and large equipment
to run a septic tank line and asked how they viewed this. Ms. Baptiste answered that
was why the lots were larger if you didn’t have public sewer. Chairman Baucom stated
that they were talking about lot sizes for property where county water and sewer
already exist. Chairman Baucom then called for comments from the public.
Commissioner Sims commented that he felt the planning board was probably the
toughest committee and he appreciated their work but still believes with the road
coming in above Peachland and Polkton we would end up with subdivisions that would
be awfully crowded. Commissioner Woodburn asked Ms. Baptiste to verify that the
meeting was properly advertised and no one from the public attended the planning
board meeting with Ms. Baptiste answering it was properly advertised and no one from
the public attended. Motion by Commissioner Woodburn, seconded by Commissioner
Spencer, to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
In regular session, Chairman Baucom asked what the next step was. Ms.
Baptiste stated that the board could accept the planning board’s recommendation for
the one text amendment to the Ordinance or change it to one acre. Chairman Baucom
voiced agreement with Commissioner Sims that she could not argue with the planning
board’s recommendation. Ms. Baptiste noted that the board did not vote on the map
and she was not sure since it was tabled if they could vote on it or if it had to be readvertised. Chairman Baucom then looked to the clerk who answered that once tabled
it can be brought back up by a board member. Ms. Baptiste added that the planning
board vote was unanimous not to recommend the change. Motion by Commissioner
Woodburn, seconded by Commissioner Spencer, to accept the recommendation of the
planning board. Commissioner Sims voiced that he hopes he is incorrect in his future
feelings. Motion carried 5 to 1 with Commissioner Sikes opposed.
Ms. Baptiste stated that the county dictates when and where we have sewer
lines. Ms. Baptiste noted the Town of Peachland just upgraded their system and they
were not in a position to upgrade again to accommodate a large scale subdivision in
that area. Chairman Baucom voiced that she would be more comfortable voting on the
map when it was in front of them. Commissioner Sims asked if a subdivision were to
come in could they change it to one acre with Ms. Baptiste answering yes. Ms. Baptiste
explained that all major subdivisions prior to anything being built cannot be platted until
approved by the Board of Commissioners. County Attorney Forbes stated that there
were also methods for variances that could be granted as well. Ms. Baptiste explained
that a variance gives relief to something that exists in the Ordinance.
FY 2012 Rural Operating Assistance Program Grant: Motion by
Commissioner Woodburn, seconded by Commissioner Sikes, to open the Public Hearing.
Motion carried unanimously.
In the Public Hearing, Chairman Baucom asked how much money and what
would be done with it. Mr. Rowell explained that this was their annual grant application
for the Rural Operating Assistance Program and money to cover elderly and disabled
transportation, general public transportation and employment transportation. Mr.
Rowell stated that last year we received $88,743 and this year we will receive
$131,000. Mr. Rowell stated that they had already disbursed the first payment.
Commissioner Sims asked about matching funds with Mr. Rowell answering this
requires a 10% match and that was covered by the fee charged riders with no cost to
the county. Commissioner Woodburn asked what accounts for the 48% increase with
money as tight as it was with Mr. Rowell explaining that the unexpended capital money
from last year was rolled over to the ROAP grant. Mr. Rowell stated that in the
previous two years they had supplemental funds that were available so if we had new
or different services we could apply. Mr. Rowell stated that the program went away but
it still had money so they rolled that into the formula fund and spread it out across the
state. Mr. Rowell stated that we came up 48% better and Union County lost $100,000.
Chairman Baucom called for comments from the public. Hearing none, motion by
Commissioner Sims, seconded by Commissioner Sikes, to close the Public Hearing.
Motion carried unanimously.
In regular session, motion by Commissioner Sikes, seconded by Commissioner
Woodburn, to approve.
CERTIFIED STATEMENT
FY 2012
RURAL OPERATING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
County of Anson
WHEREAS, the state-funded, formula-based Rural Operating Assistance Program (ROAP) administered
by the North Carolina Department of Transportation, Public Transportation Division provides funding for
the operating cost of passenger trips and for other transportation services for counties within the state;
WHEREAS, the county uses the most recent transportation plans (i.e. CTSP, CTIP, LCP) available and
other public involvement strategies to learn about the transportation needs of agencies and individuals in
the county before determining the sub-allocation of these ROAP funds;
WHEREAS, the county government or regional public transportation authorities created pursuant to
Article 25 or Article 26 of Chapter 160A of the General Statutes (upon written agreement with the
municipalities or counties served) are the only eligible recipient of Rural Operating Assistance Program
funds which are allocated to the counties based on a formula as described in the Program Guidelines
included in the ROAP application. NCDOT will disburse the ROAP funds only to counties and eligible
transportation authorities and not to any sub-recipients selected by the county;
WHEREAS, the county finance officer will be considered the county official accountable for the
administration of the Rural Operating Assistance Program in the county, unless otherwise designated by
the Board of County Commissioners;
WHEREAS, the passenger trips and transportation services provided with ROAP funds must be
accessible to individuals with disabilities and be provided without discrimination on the basis of national
origin, creed, age, race or gender (FTA C 4702.1A, FTA C 4704.1, Americans with Disabilities Act 1990);
and
WHEREAS, the period of performance for these funds will be July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012 regardless of
the date on which ROAP funds are disbursed to the county.
NOW, THEREFORE, by signing below, the duly authorized representatives of the County of
Anson North Carolina certify that the following statements are true and accurate:

The county employed a documented methodology for sub-allocating ROAP funds that involved the
participation of eligible agencies and citizens. Outreach efforts to include the participation of the
elderly and individuals with disabilities, persons with limited English proficiency, minorities and low
income persons in the county’s sub-allocation decision have been documented.

The county will advise any sub-recipients about the source of the ROAP funds, specific program
requirements and restrictions, eligible program expenses and reporting requirements. The county
will be responsible for invoicing any sub-recipients for unexpended ROAP funds as needed.

The county will monitor ROAP funded services routinely to verify that ROAP funds are being spent on
allowable activities and that the eligibility of service recipients is being properly documented. The
county will maintain records of trips and services for five years that prove that an eligible citizen was
provided an eligible service or trip on the billed date, by whatever conveyance at the specified cost.

The county will be responsible for monitoring the safety, quality and cost of ROAP funded services
and assures that any procurements by subrecipients for contracted services will follow state
guidelines.

The county will conduct regular evaluations of ROAP funded passenger trips and transportation
services provided throughout the period of performance.

The county will only use the ROAP funds to provide trips and other transportation services when
other funding sources are not available for the same purpose or the other funding sources for the
same purpose have been completely exhausted.

The county assures that the required matching funds for the FY2012 ROAP can be generated from
fares and/or provided from local funds.

The county will notify the Mobility Development Specialist assigned to the county if any ROAP funded
services are discontinued before the end of the period of performance due to the lack of funding. No
additional ROAP funds will be available.

The county manager will provide written assurance to the Public Transportation Division that the
employment transportation needs in the county have been met prior to transferring any Employment
Transportation Program (EMPL) funds. The letter will describe the process used to make this
determination. Transfer of EMPL funds is prohibited if there are any unmet needs or service
strategies in the Coordinated Public Transit – Human Services Transportation Plan that have not been
addressed.

The county will provide an accounting of trips, services and expenditures in semi-annual reports to
NCDOT – Public Transportation Division or its designee.

Any interest earned on the ROAP funds will be expended for eligible program uses as specified in the
ROAP application. The County will include ROAP funds received and expended in its annual
independent audit on the schedule of federal and state financial assistance. Funds passed through to
other agencies will be identified as such.

The county is applying for the following amounts of FY 2012 Rural Operating Assistance Program
funds:
State-Funded Rural Operating Assistance Program
Allocated
Requested
Elderly & Disabled Transportation Assistance Program
(EDTAP)
$56,741
$56,741
Employment Transportation Assistance Program (EMPL)
Rural General Public Program (RGP)
$25,926
$49,022
$25,926
$49,022
$131,689
$131,689
TOTAL
Chairman Baucom stated that she just noticed that she did not remind Board
members of the Ethics Policy. Chairman Baucom asked if anyone knows of a conflict or
potential conflict of interest to please let them know so they could deal with it.
Appearances:
Jeff Waisner presented a brief update on the building projects. Mr. Waisner
stated that the Belk building had had a major facelift. Mr. Waisner shared that they
had problems with the chimney effect where it was so open the hot and cold air was
going to the top so they added a dropped ceiling, installed new lighting, removed the
carpet and replaced with tile. Mr. Waisner stated that they had the parquet floor
refinished and it looks brand new. Mr. Waisner shared that they moved one of the child
support employees from the front to the back. They plan to install bullet proof glass in
the new opening and concrete in the wall beneath for more security. Mr. Waisner
shared that most of the recommendations came from a phone call to child support and
suggestions from Sheriff Allen. Mr. Waisner stated that they plan to install a glass door
leading to the probation office that will be opened electronically so they can see who is
at the door. Mr. Waisner stated they removed the double doors in the back and put a
brick façade, put a canopy over the back door, replaced the gutter and they would soon
start painting inside. Mr. Waisner shared that on Saturday a company plans to remove
all the glass on the front and replace it with new glass and two double doors. Chairman
Baucom mentioned the side of the building with Mr. Waisner stating it had already been
pressure washed and he hoped to have the painting done in a couple of weeks.
Chairman Baucom asked the color with Mr. Waisner answering they would stay with
white. Commissioner Woodburn asked about the water issue with Mr. Waisner
answering there was still an issue in the basement and they keep pumps in there
pumping it to the street. Mr. Waisner shared that the library renovations started
September 6 with plans to remodel all bathrooms and bring them up to code and ADA
accessible. Mr. Waisner shared that they added to the plans a kitchen remodel with
new appliances. Mr. Waisner stated that they replaced all the carpet and tile and hopes
to have the project completed by October 31st. Mr. Waisner reported on a meeting with
County Manager Gatewood and Ms. Jackson regarding modifications to the lobby at
DSS and the hope to have quotes in soon. Mr. Waisner stated that they would like to
drop the ceiling about two feet, replace some of front glass, paint and possibly
refinishing the tile floor. Mr. Waisner then reported on a meeting with Captain Paxton
and Sheriff Allen concerning renovations to the jail that were in the last jail inspection
report. Mr. Waisner stated that even if they bring the jail up to a minimum of what
they were asking they would still be behind. Mr. Waisner stated that Parks and Rec.
had 200 children playing football this year and they were also doing T-ball, coach pitch,
micro soccer, youth soccer, Dixie Youth baseball, Dixie Youth girls softball, cheerleading
and shag lessons. Mr. Waisner stated that D. H. Griffin started demolition of the old
Armory on a Tuesday and completed the job the next Monday. Mr. Waisner shared that
we have a portable fence up for safety and the area looks really good. Mr. Waisner
stated that Mr. Lowery hopes to start installing new windows at the courthouse in the
next six weeks and hopes to install one window a day. Mr. Waisner stated there were
137 windows and hopes to have this completed in six months. Vice Chair Streater
commented that one side of the steps had been cleaned and looked good with Mr.
Waisner stating this would be one of the last things done. Mr. Waisner introduced
Ansel Broome, the expert taking care of the project. Mr. Waisner shared that Mr.
Broome had been restoring historical landmarks for over 30 years and one of the ones
he restored was Fort Sumter. Mr. Broome of Southern Restoration and Maintenance
stated that they specialize in restoring historical masonry structures in North and South
Carolina. Mr. Broome explained that the base wall of the courthouse was concrete and
the actual face of the building was brick masonry. Mr. Broome noted that the top
cornice and decorative stone was terracotta. Mr. Broome noted water issues in all three
masonry surfaces primarily from the open deteriorated mortar joints. Mr. Broome
stated that they cut out all the mortar joints in the concrete and the deteriorated mortar
joints in the brick masonry and removed all the mortar joints in the terracotta and will
replace them eventually. Mr. Broome stated that the concrete would receive a mineral
silicate coating that is an inorganic material that will not deteriorate or fade and the
masonry would be repointed and treated with a clear sealer. Mr. Broome explained
that the terracotta mortar joints would be replaced, the mineral silicate coating applied
and once all these operations were finished not only would we have a water tight
building but one that looks brand new. Mr. Broome stated that they were matching the
colors to the original. Chairman Baucom asked if the down spouts would be replaced
with Mr. Broome answering yes with new copper and they would also clean the
monuments. Chairman Baucom voiced that feedback from the community was they
were pleased with what was being done. Commissioner Woodburn asked the expected
completion date with Mr. Broome answering with good weather they should be out by
the end of October. Commissioner Woodburn asked if that was everything with County
Manager Gatewood answering we would probably be into May before all the windows
were replaced. Commissioner Woodburn asked if once Mr. Broome was finished and
the windows replaced if that was all of the first part with County Manager Gatewood
answering in part. County Manager Gatewood noted we plan to replace the concrete
pad in front and that would be phase 3 of the first phase. Chairman Baucom voiced
appreciation to Mr. Broome for the work he was doing.
Stuart Darden, Mold Report-Parks and Recreation Office: Mr. Darden, of
the North Carolina Association of County Commissioners, stated that he has been
working with our safety committee and that was how he came to this location. Mr.
Darden had a power point presentation on his recent inspection of the main office for
Parks and Recreation at Little Park. Mr. Darden stated that he was asked to perform a
mold test at this location on June 28 and when he completed this inspection he also
visited the courthouse for a test. Mr. Darden shared that samples were taken in the
main lobby, the two changing rooms and one sample outside. Mr. Darden stated that
outdoors he found a count of 89,500 spores and compared to the women’s changing
room there was actually a higher mold level inside this area than outside. Mr. Darden
stated that this was significant because usually when doing mold sampling he compares
the results found inside to what was outside on that day and it should always be lower
than outside. Mr. Darden stated it was about half of what was found in the men’s
changing room and the office lobby. Mr. Darden shared that in the courthouse lobby it
was 654 which was not an unusual number in a controlled climate. Mr. Darden stated
that at the Parks and Recreation building you can see where water was leaking in
through the roof and it needs to be replaced. Chairman Baucom asked the age of the
building with Mr. Waisner answering it was built in 1974. Mr. Darden stated that they
saw rust on the main electrical box and this could damage the junction boxes. Mr.
Darden also questioned the safety of the electrical system in the changing rooms. Mr.
Darden also noted an issue with storage in the fact that they have to park the gator in
the building at night to keep it from getting stolen and this causes issues with the Fire
Marshal and another issue was that gasoline should not be in an area where you would
have meetings and people changing clothes. Mr. Darden noted another issue was they
have no other area to put removal basketball goals or a seat from their van other than
the main lobby. Mr. Darden stated when they have meetings all these items have to be
removed and replaced at the end of the meeting and he was concerned for back
injuries, people tripping and liability for the county. Mr. Darden commented that the
mold levels were much higher than you would find under normal circumstances. Mr.
Darden commented that he was surprised at the high level found in the lobby due to
the fact that they were running air conditioning and normally that keeps the humidity
down. Commissioner Woodburn stated that you would think with all the water intrusion
the ventilation was just not good enough. Chairman Baucom asked if the building was
worth salvaging with Mr. Darden answering that was beyond his ability to assess. Mr.
Darden commented that we have one of the nicest pools he has seen since he has been
doing this job but unfortunately the facility was not very nice. Mr. Darden commented
that the changing rooms do not have a place for people to put towels or bathing suits
so they end up putting those on the pool deck and again he was concerned about
people tripping and being injured. Chairman Baucom voiced appreciation for the
report. County Manager Gatewood noted that in addition to the mold issue it was clear
the building was in need of some major repairs but he did not know if it was worth
salvaging or not but we would come to a decision soon. Chairman Baucom asked what
additional activities could be offered if we had a gym with Mr. Waisner answering that
they worked so hard in 2000/2001 to enclose the pool. Mr. Waisner shared that they
hired an architect and they still have the plans for a new office building that in time
would have given us a gymnasium and aquatic center. Mr. Waisner stated that the
programs they could have offered would have been unlimited. Mr. Waisner stated that
had they enclosed the pool they would have taught swimming and had things going on
twelve months a year. Mr. Waisner stated that that was probably the hardest time he’s
had after working on this for so many years and then receiving the grant after a three
year cycle and then having to send the money back. Mr. Waisner stated that his
recreation piers in Raleigh frowned on us when they gave us money and we didn’t
follow through. Mr. Waisner commented that he feels the building could probably be
salvaged. Chairman Baucom voiced this was why she was so surprised because it did
not look anything like this when she toured the facility three or four years ago. Mr.
Waisner stated that their attic was full of equipment as well as their maintenance shop
on Washington Street. Mr. Waisner added that during this time of year if someone
comes in needing a new football helmet they have to close the office if no one else is
there and get the helmet and come back. County Manager Gatewood stated that a
plan would be brought forth in due course.
John Underwood – 2011/2012 Secondary Road Paving Program: Mr.
Underwood, District Engineer for Anson and Union counties, thanked the board for the
opportunity to present the program. Mr. Underwood stated that when they get to the
end of the program they would continue to receive funding but they would change
gears and go from paving dirt roads to making paved improvements. Mr. Underwood
shared that they receive funding every year and some years more than others. Mr.
Underwood shared that in the last 80’s House Bill 750 was enacted and established a
formula for funding secondary road construction. Mr. Underwood stated that when first
enacted the money from the trust fund could only be spent on unpaved road. Mr.
Underwood shared that in order to make the paving priority and get on the list a road
has to be maintained by NCDOT. Mr. Underwood shared that every four years his office
goes through the county looking at all unpaved DOT maintained roadways. Mr.
Underwood added that they do not maintain private roadways. Mr. Underwood stated
that they evaluate the roads using characteristics such as length, number of homes,
schools, a school bus route or a dead end and assign points based on the criteria. Mr.
Underwood stated that once a road makes the top ten lists it can never be removed.
Mr. Underwood did state that the only things that could cause problems with paving or
environmental concerns were not being able to receive a permit or right of way
acquisition. Mr. Underwood stated that they ask property owners to dedicate right of
way for the road construction and if they are not willing to do so they document that
and move on to the next road. Mr. Underwood added that this road then gets put on
right of way hold and it was up to the homeowners if it comes back up in later years.
Mr. Underwood stated that in 2010 changes to the bill made it possible for a portion of
the Highway Trust funding allocation to be used towards paved secondary roads. Mr.
Underwood stated that currently Anson County has nineteen eligible unpaved secondary
roads and that accounts for approximately 12.2 miles. Commissioner Sims stated that
he had brought this up several times before and mentioned the condition of CarpenterHorne Road. Commissioner Sims commented that senior citizens living on the road
have complained about the road being bumpy and having steep drop offs.
Commissioner Sims shared that he examined the road yesterday and things went ok
until he reached the dead end and turned around and going back up the road it was
awful. Mr. Underwood asked if it was unpaved with Commissioner Sims answering it
was paved but it looks like money was short when it was paved. Mr. Underwood stated
that Lee Ainsworth, the County Maintenance Engineer for Anson County, as unable to
attend tonight but he would give him this information and have him take a look to see
what could be done. Commissioner Woodburn mentioned SR1228, White Store Road
coming off SR1121, noting they were currently replacing a bridge here but Poplar Hill
Church was on this road and it has a lot of wear and tear. Commissioner Woodburn
noted it was not on the list and asked what could be done to get it on the list. Mr.
Underwood stated that unfortunately all roads would not fall under this category and
paved improvements with this program targets smaller roads but he would take a look.
Commissioner Sikes mentioned the other end of Grassy Island Road from Stanback
Ferry Road to Ingram Mountain Road. Commissioner Sikes mentioned that at one time
it was paved with Mr. Underwood stating that Grassy Island Extension was on the
program approved last year and it was still on the program. Mr. Underwood noted that
Grassy Island Extension was slated to receive full depth reclamation. Mr. Underwood
stated this would be the same that was done for Redfearn Road but unfortunately with
the funding schedule they were trying to decide where the money would best be spent.
Mr. Underwood stated that Grassy Island Extension needs it but decisions were made to
do projects that serve for the greater good. Commissioner Sikes stated that the dirt
portion was better traveling than Ingram Mountain Road. Mr. Underwood added that
their failures tend to follow logging activities. Mr. Underwood shared that sometimes
an 80,000 pound log truck could do more damage than 20,000 vehicles. Mr.
Underwood stated that sometimes they were unaware of issues and asked Board
members to share specific concerns with the district or let Anson maintenance know.
Mr. Underwood then reviewed the 2011/2012 construction program. Mr. Underwood
shared that they had a large rollover balance from the 2009/2010 and this year their
funding was cut by a good percentage so they have roughly half of the total anticipated
than they had last year. Mr. Underwood noted that paving road alternates were
important because if they are unable to obtain right-of-ways it would enable them to
continue to move forward with that year’s program. Mr. Underwood then asked the
board to approve a Resolution in support of the program and upon receipt he would
forward to the Board of Transportation in Raleigh for approval. Mr. Underwood stated
that was once approved they would go to work. Mr. Underwood shared that he often
receives calls asking why they don’t strip roads and the explanation was if the road has
less than 300 vehicles a day and a certain length they generally do not stripe. Mr.
Underwood added that it saves their budget if they don’t have to maintain strips on
roads. Motion by Commissioner Woodburn, seconded by Commissioner Sikes, to
approve the 2011/12 Anson County Secondary Road Paving Program and the following
Resolution. Motion carried unanimously.
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Secondary Roads Construction Program
Anson County
FY 2011-2012 Anticipated Allocation
Highway Fund
$ 580,649.96
Trust Fund
$ 470,864.47
Plus Balance From 2011 $ 160,000.00
Total
$ 1,211,514.43
I. Paving Unpaved Roads
Programmed Paving Goal: 2.3 Miles
A. Rural Paving Priority
Priority
Number
10
15
SR No.
Length
(Miles)
1868
1826
Road Name and Description
Est. Cost
0.65 Ponderosa Rd from SR 1822 to DE
1.65 Cairo Rd. from SR 1828 to Existing
Pavement
Total Miles _2.30__
$304,272.94
$462,532.00
Subtotal
$766,804.94
* Rural Paving Alternates
Priority
Number
16
17
18
19
SR No.
1743
1224
1737
1215
Length
(Miles)
2.27
1.10
1.15
0.45
B. Subdivision Paving Priority
Road Name and Description
Panzy from SR 1704 to DE – ROW Hold
Hornesboro Rd. from SR 1220 to DE
Ingram Level Rd. from SR 1744 to DE
Rob Currie Rd. from SR 1214 to DE
Est. Cost
$970,135.00
$330,262.44
$284,275.44
$108,626.03
Priority
Number
SR No.
Length
(Miles)
Road Name and Description
Total Miles: ___________
Est. Cost
Subtotal _____________
*Subdivision Paving Alternates
Priority
Number
SR No.
Length
(Miles)
Road Name and Description
Est. Cost
* In the event that any roads in priority have to be placed on the “Hold List” due to unavailable
right of way or environmental review, or if additional funding becomes available, funds will be
applied to the roads listed in priority order in the paving alternate list.
II. General Secondary Road Improvements
A. Paved Road Improvements
SR No.
SR 1428
2.4 Miles
SR 1801
1.9 Miles
SR 1428 - ALT
1.55 Miles
SR 1251 - ALT
3.9 Miles
SR 1110 - ALT
2.0 Miles
SR 1110 - ALT
2.1
Project Description
Est. Cost
Cameron Rd. from SR 1418 To SR 1429
$354,310
Hailey’s Ferry Rd from US 74 to SR 1806
$91,285
Cameron Rd. from SR 1418 to NC 742
$262,500
Horne Town Road from WCL Polkton to SR 1240
$585,000
Mayesville Road
$300,000
Mayesville Road from SR 1114 to South Caroline
Line
$315,000
ALT - Alternate
Note: Partially Funded in 2011 $ 91,285.00
Balance= $146,215.00 to be funded 2012
Subtotal
$445,595.00
B. Unpaved Road Spot Improvements
Subtotal
III. Trust Fund Safety Improvements (GS 136-182)
SR No.
Project Description
Est. Cost
Subtotal $____________
IV. Funds reserved for surveying, right of way acquisition,
acquisition, road additions, contingencies, overdrafts,
and paving entrances to certified fire departments,
rescue squads, etc.
Subtotal $
GRAND TOTAL
$1,212,399.94
Freddie Paxton – Jail Update: Mr. Paxton advised that they were housing 53
inmates today with zero being housed in other county jails, 1 being held with DOC in
Raleigh and zero awaiting transportation to DOC. Mr. Paxton stated that for the month
of August they had a daily population of 66 inmates with a total of 177 inmates being
booked during that month. Commissioner Sims asked Mr. Paxton if he knew anything
about a silver looking helicopter flying around his house with Mr. Paxton answering the
only silver helicopter he knew of belonged to highway patrol but he would look into
this.
Rodney Diggs – Meth Lab Cleanup Cost: Mr. Diggs explained that DEA
used to pay for meth lab cleanup but they ran out of money so this would now be the
responsibility of the county. Mr. Diggs noted this year we allocated $5,000 for cleanup
and he hopes this will be sufficient but it depends on the size and number of labs
found. Chairman Baucom asked if there was any recourse to the owners of the
property with Mr. Diggs stating he did not know but this would be something for the
Sheriff to discuss with the Judges. County Attorney Forbes voiced that there may be
some way going in and cleaning up the hazard as a safety risk and then putting a lien
on the property for repayment. County Attorney Forbes stated that he was not sure
but would be glad to research the matter. Chairman Baucom stated that she would like
to know if the Board could pass some type Ordinance holding people accountable for
cleaning the meth labs. County Attorney Forbes stated he understands meth labs were
usually a user funded program where there was not a lot of cash left over and not as
organized as some of the more profitable drugs. Chairman Baucom voiced appreciation
to Mr. Diggs for going out to the coast during the hurricane and helping the people
there.
Public Addresses to the Board: There were none.
Chairman Baucom called for a ten minute break.
After the break, Administrative Matters was the next topic.
Carolina Thread Trail: Ms. Baptiste stated that they have confirmation that
they have received a $59,508 planning grant from the Carolina Thread Trail for the
Greenway Master Plan for the county. Ms. Baptiste shared that they also received a
$10,000 grant from the Yost Foundation that would take care of the county’s match for
the Carolina Thread Trail grant. Ms. Baptiste referred to a copy of the contract with
Stewart Engineering, the firm selected to do the actual planning document. Chairman
Baucom asked what others they had done with Ms. Baptiste answering they’ve done
Union and Cabarrus counties and she could not remember the other. Chairman
Baucom was of the impression that Mr. Bricken was going to suggest that he and Ms.
Baptiste talk with those in Union County to see if there were things we need to watch
out for. Chairman Baucom asked if the $10,000 from Yost included the $6,000 raised
at a local dinner with Mr. Baptiste explaining that the money would go back into the
county’s account with Carolina Thread Trail for implementation of the master plan. Ms.
Baptiste shared that they plan to use the Yost money first and any leftover would also
roll into the implementation along with the $6,000. Commissioner Sims asked about
the thought one time about using the old railroad bed for bike trails with Chairman
Baucom answering they could not get all the property and it just died. Motion by
Commissioner Spencer, seconded by Commissioner Woodburn, to approve the grant
and the contract. Motion carried unanimously.
Adoption of 2009 North Carolina Codes and 2011 National Electrical
Codes: Marvin Deese, Inspector, asked the Board to approve all North Carolina
Building Codes so he would not have to appear each time new codes were approved.
Mr. Deese explained that we could not change anything in the codes but we have to
abide by them. Chairman Baucom asked if we had any latitude if something doesn’t
make sense with Mr. Deese answering if the Board wanted to make an amendment we
could complete the paperwork and send it to the Building Code Council in Raleigh for
approval for Anson County only. Chairman Baucom asked if they approve it or the
General Assembly with Mr. Deese answering the Building Code Council. Mr. Deese
stated that he would not recommend changing anything as it should be statewide. Mr.
Deese added that North Carolina was the second or third largest state in the nation that
has strict rules. Chairman Baucom asked why we run into situations where people
come here saying people in Union County did it this way and it was ok. Mr. Deese felt
the code book could be interpreted in many different ways. Mr. Deese asked the board
to adopt all approved North Carolina Building Codes and the National Electrical Codes.
Motion by Vice Chair Streater, seconded by Commissioner Woodburn, to adopt all North
Carolina Building Codes and the National Electrical Code. Motion carried 5 to 1 with
Chairman Baucom opposed.
Contract Extension Agreement: Chairman Baucom voiced that it sounded
like they were amiable to another ten year contract. County Manager Gatewood
suggested discussion of this issue in closed session.
Closed Session: Motion by Commissioner Sikes, seconded by Commissioner
Woodburn to go into closed session for Economic Development pursuant to North
Carolina General Statutes 143-318.11(a)(4) to discuss matters relating to the location or
expansion of business in the area served by this body and to Consult with Attorney
pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes 143-318.11(a)(3) to consider and give
instructions concerning a potential or actual claim, administrative procedure or judicial
action, North Carolina General Statutes 143-318.11(a)(5) for contract negotiations and
North Carolina General Statutes 143-318.11(a)(6) to consider the qualifications,
competence, performance, condition of appointment of a public officer or employee or
prospective public officer or employee. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Vice Chair Streater, seconded by Commissioner Woodburn, to go out
of closed session. Motion carried unanimously.
In regular session, motion by Vice Chair Streater, seconded by Commissioner
Spencer, to approve the Contract Extension with the Town of Marshville. Motion carried
unanimously.
Manager’s Report: County Manager Gatewood reported that they were
playing catch up on deferred maintenance repairs, renovations, etc. but they were
paying close attention to our budget commitment. County Manager Gatewood stated
that when we started out this year we were at 6.5 million dollars in our fund balance
and to balance the operating budget they used $450,000. County Manager Gatewood
stated that they set aside $1,000,000 for the courthouse stabilization and security
enhancements and we were still on track to come in under this number by a few
thousand dollars. County Manager Gatewood referred to the Lockhart-Taylor roof
replacement noting they were preparing the construction document with formal bidding
taking place in October. County Manager Gatewood stated that we plan to spend
$51,000 at the Hampton B. Allen Library due to including the renovation of the small
kitchen. County Manager Gatewood shared that the employees and Ms. Walters were
very excited. County Manager Gatewood noted that $50,000 was budgeted for the
demolition of the old armory and it actually cost $47,860 plus $1,000 for the security
fencing with a one year lease. County Manager Gatewood shared that they still believe
they can get the site preparation, architectural design and needs analysis conducted for
Phase 1 of the Emergency Services and Transportation Center for $225,000. County
Manager Gatewood stated that at the Farmers Market they removed the hanging
insulation for a little less than $2,000. County Manager Gatewood shared that they feel
this building was way underutilized and until the farmers come with a plan to make
better use of the building we need to save our money.
Chairman’s Report: Chairman Baucom asked that the minutes reflect our
thanks to Janine Rywak and staff for planning and putting together the Horn O’ Plenty
meal at the County Commissioner’s conference. Chairman Baucom stated that it was
beautifully done; the food was good and a very nice event. Chairman Baucom added
that she made us proud.
Old Business:
Web Design Update: County Manager Gatewood noted no progress had been
made as they were working diligently to get the audit report in on time in December.
County Manager Gatewood noted there would be more information at the next meeting.
Driveway Repair: Commissioner Woodburn stated that nothing needs to
happen right now. The Clerk stated this was added at the request of Commissioner
Woodburn to keep track of this issue.
Revisions to the Personnel Ordinance Article VI: County Manager
Gatewood asked to move forward with the first part pertaining to voluntary shared
leave. County Manager Gatewood asked to limit it to full time employees. County
Manager Gatewood noted the second part was inconsistent with State Office of
Personnel and since about one-third of our employees fall under that umbrella he
withdrew that recommendation. Motion by Vice Chair Streater, seconded by
Commissioner Spencer, to approve the change in the wording to include full time
employees. Motion carried unanimously.
Eligibility:
Current Wording: (1) the employee must be a full-time employee with a permanent
probationary, trainee or time-limited permanent appointment. Participation in this program shall be
based on the employee’s past compliance with leave rules.
Recommended Change:
(1) the employee must be a full-time employee.
Report on Daily Deposits: Commissioner Sims commented that he’s been on
the board about fourteen years and we’ve been talking about daily deposits that long.
Chairman Baucom noted it was an issue and she knows the board has refused to
consider allowing exceptions to the daily deposit rule. Chairman Baucom felt this was
not a good time but at some point they need to have an understanding of the pros and
cons. Chairman Baucom added that they were trying to do something that evidently
could not be done. Vice Chair Streater stated that this appears in the audit every year.
Ms. James shared that this past December/January they had a batch that started on a
Monday and was not balanced and deposited until Friday. Ms. James noted it was a
considerable amount of money and that is why we get deposit infractions. Ms. James
added that we get written up for just one. Vice Chair Streater asked if the money was
being kept in the office with Ms. James answering yes. Ms. James stated that if you
don’t balance that batch of work and put it in the bank the next day then we are open
for liability. Chairman Baucom was of the opinion that if it was over $250 it had to be
taken to the bank daily. Ms. James explained that all of our deposit infractions have
been in the thousands of dollars. Commissioner Woodburn stated that it seems you
could verify the amount of money and make the deposit and then reconcile the
paperwork. Ms. James stated they could but if they are out of balance and can’t get in
balance they want to find the problem before depositing the money. Ms. James stated
that if they were to employ others to help them they could get it resolved quickly.
Chairman Baucom asked if anyone had explained that this was apparently a law with
County Manager Gatewood answering yes. Vice Chair Streater asked if it was one
department more than others with Ms. James answering it was Central Collections.
Commissioner Woodburn felt this was not something you deal with on email but
favored a face to face discussion of processes and procedures. County Manager
Gatewood stated that it had been done face to face and individually with Mr. Dutton as
well. Vice Chair Streater wondered if you would get their attention if you sent someone
home for a couple of days. Chairman Baucom asked if it was the State Treasurer or the
State Auditor that was on us. Vice Chair Streater commented that Mrs. Bennett puts it
in her report every year. Ms. James stated that Mrs. Bennett has to send her audit to
the state to be approved and that was where the state generates the letter about the
deposit infractions. Ms. James added that they have departments that faithfully bring
them $20 a day. Ms. James shared that Mrs. Bennett would say we don’t want this
money sitting around because we run the risk of embezzlement. Ms. James stated that
when the public sees this in the paper they instantly think we are not doing what we
should be doing and we worked real hard to build that integrity back up. County
Manager Gatewood asked to take the assignment to follow up and he, Ms. James and
Mr. Thomas would meet with Mr. Dutton to underscore our expectation and define the
penalty if this was not met. Commissioner Spencer asked Ms. James if she would
suggest making a deposit every day with Ms. James answering yes. Vice Chair Streater
and others added that it was the law. Commissioner Sims asked if it was an individual
or everybody with County Manager Gatewood answering they would meet specifically
with Mr. Dutton since that was the department with the issue but he would continue to
reinforce the expectation with everybody.
GrowGreen Resolution: Motion by Vice Chair Streater, seconded by
Commissioner Spencer, to approve. Motion carried unanimously.
GrowGreen Resolution
WHEREAS, on July 5, 2011, GrowGreen, Inc. announced its intention to locate their first North Carolina
project in Anson County; and
WHEREAS, GrowGreen, Inc. is an integrator of renewable energy and greenhouse growing systems;
combined solar thermal and biomass plants that provide electricity to the power grid and climate
controlled hydroponic greenhouses; and
WHEREAS, the GrowGreen mission to provide fresh, local produce and clean energy to the population
benefits our existing agricultural base and supports energy providers’ need for renewable energy.
WHEREAS, the proposed plant will provide an estimated 300 jobs in a community with high
unemployment; and
WHEREAS, the physical plant will represent a substantial investment in this community; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anson County Board of Commissioners welcomes and
supports GrowGreen’s proposed project and encourages all citizens, other government agencies and the
business community to promote GrowGreen’s success in Anson County, North Carolina.
Adopted this 10th day of September, 2011.
Rock Hill Missionary Baptist Church: Chairman Baucom asked Board
members to add the Resolution to the Agenda. Chairman Baucom stated that Rock Hill
Missionary Baptist Church would celebrate 125 years of service. Motion by
Commissioner Spencer, seconded by Vice Chair Streater, to approve. Motion carried
unanimously. Chairman Baucom noted that it was written by the Clerk and was very
simple and elegant. County Manager Gatewood added that it was well presented and
looked very good.
The
Anson County Board of Commissioners
Resolution
Be it hereby known to all that the
Anson County Board of Commissioners
Offers its sincerest congratulations
to
Rock Hill Missionary Baptist Church
In recognition of
THE CELEBRATION OF YOUR 125TH ANNIVERSARY
The entire Board extends best wishes on this memorable occasion and directs this
resolution be presented on
This 25th day of September, 2011.
Consent Agenda: Motion by Vice Chair Streater, seconded by Commissioner
Woodburn, to approve. Motion carried unanimously.
Minutes: Approved minutes dated August 2, 2011 and closed session minutes of the same date.
Tax Releases: Approved as follows:
Property Tax Releases/Refunds/Adjustments
09/12/11
19482 Anson Mechanical
18539 Beachum, George
19481 Brown, Winnie
18534 Burgess, Gary R
18531 Burr, Aaron J
18538 Davis Mechanical
19535 Entogenetics
19496 Ferguson, Charles E
19497 Ferguson, Charles E
19498 Ferguson, Charles E
19493 Ferguson, Charles E
19494 Ferguson, Charles E
19495 Ferguson, Charles E
18542 Florida's Natural
18533 Froeber, Donald
18532 Little, John Frank
19479 Meachem, Raymond
18537 Merritt, Robert
18545 Short, George D
18544 Short, Harold M
19483 Smith, James E
19484 Smith, James E
19485 Smith, James E
19486 Smith, James E
19487 Smith, James E
19488 Smith, James E
19489 Smith, James E
19490 Smith, James E
19491 Smith, James E
19492 Smith, James E
19499 Taylor, Jeremy D
19500 Taylor, Jeremy D
18541 Turner, Robert W
18536 Wright, Danny Lee
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2010
2009
2008
2010
2009
2008
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
202.16
68.63
4.66
477.13
205.75
700.04
337.36
556.41
457.07
492.46
426.82
349.41
376.46
1.24
14.21
492.80
193.04
32.45
187.30
231.41
25.88
22.91
23.48
22.10
21.10
19.78
18.46
22.11
17.34
16.01
1,305.57
159.32
20.94
6,467.10
$
$
19475 Beachum, George Hauling
20048 Carpenter, Larry Jr
19211 Cauthen, Thomas
20043 Chavis, Andrew
20045 Cole, Robert
19476 Creager, James M
19477 Creager, James M
19209 Deese, Harold M
20042 Edwards, Helen
18540 Flake, Kathryn
19648 Harrington, Russell
19205 Lindsay, Leroy
20036 McAllister, Annie
20037 McAllister, Annie
20038 McAllister, Annie
20039 McAllister, Annie
20040 McAllister, Annie
19210 McIntyre, Nancy
20046 Paul, Anthony
20041 Polk, Irvin
19650 Sales, Linda Carol
19208 Snuggs, Henry M
19204 Streater, Lucille
19202 Teal, Amber Lee
19201 Warner, Rhonda Deese
18543 Williams Fuel Acquisition
20035 Wilson, Anita
2011
2011
2011
2010
2010
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2007
2010
2010
2009
2008
2011
2010
2009
2011
2011
2011
2011
2010
2011
2008
19203 Brand, William E
20047 Hildreth, Chantira
19649 Jackson, Benjamin
19206 Jacobs, Barbara
2010
2010
2011
2010
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Real Taxes
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Late List Error
Adjustment on Land Value
Late List Error
Influence Factor Correction
Eligible for Senior Exemption
Listing Error
Listing Error
Eligible for Farm Deferment
Eligible for Farm Deferment
Eligible for Farm Deferment
Eligible for Farm Deferment
Eligible for Farm Deferment
Eligible for Farm Deferment
Property no longer in County
Value Change
Mobile Home Removed
Eligible for Exemption
Property moved out of County
Property Correction
Listing Error
Mobile Home Removed
Mobile Home Removed
Mobile Home Removed
Mobile Home Removed
Mobile Home Removed
Mobile Home Removed
Mobile Home Removed
Mobile Home Removed
Mobile Home Removed
Mobile Home Removed
House Correction
House Correction
Listing Error
Listing Error
Real Taxes
Refund
1107-000610
1108-000236
1108-000274
1103-000327
1103-000355
1106-000400
1107-000420
1108-000410
1105-000606
1108-000491
1106-000735
1105-001246
0804-001290
1103-001340
1101-001037
1001-000890
0809-001230
1108-001129
1006-001406
1006-001460
1107-001583
1108-001558
1107-001719
1106-001857
1103-002003
1108-001916
0805-002452
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Situs
Proration
Proration
Proration
Proration
Military LES Exemption
Military LES Exemption
Proration
Proration
Adjustment for Value
Proration
Proration
Proration
Proration
Proration
Proration
Proration
Proration
Proration
Proration
Proration
Proration
Proration
Proration
Proration
Proration
Proration
1103-000158
1012-000694
1106-000913
1008-000857
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Refund
Refund
Refund
Refund
Proration
Proration
Proration
Proration
13,968.91
26.13
18.04
91.70
76.23
21.77
10.87
39.91
11.66
40.40
42.06
41.69
9.10
6.12
18.40
33.12
27.68
5.60
63.30
40.78
28.14
41.00
24.00
63.27
40.70
31.60
243.26
44.75
$
11-4-473
11-1-925
11-5-2001
11-6-2119
11-7-2204
11-2-4322
11-4-5395
11-8-DF27020
11-8-DF27021
11-8-DF27022
11-8-DF27023
11-8-DF27024
11-8-DF27025
11-7-5621
11-7-5787
11-4-10778
11-7-12330
11-4-12513
11-6-15814
11-6-DF27056
02-5-15072
03-5-15319
04-5-15480
05-5-15572
06-5-15842
07-5-15915
08-5-15975
09-5-16055
10-5-16161
11-5-16199
11-2-17168
11-2-17169
11-2-18137
11-4-19553
1,141.28
16.50
10.62
114.96
15.50
20035 Wilson, Anita
2008
19203 Brand, William E
20047 Hildreth, Chantira
19649 Jackson, Benjamin
19206 Jacobs, Barbara
20044 Kirby, Patrick
2010
2010
2011
2010
2010
44.75 0805-002452
$
-
15,317.82
Tax Collector’s Report:
1103-000158
1012-000694
1106-000913
1008-000857
1104-001108
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Vehicle Taxes
Proration
Proration
Proration
Proration
Proration
Refund
Refund
Refund
Refund
Refund
207.63
-
$
Proration
1,141.28
16.50
10.62
114.96
15.50
50.05
$
Vehicle Taxes Release
Vehicle Taxes Adjustment Situs
Vehicle Property Taxes
FY 2011-2012 -
Current Ad Valorem Year - 2011
August 31, 2011
(Total $$ Collections)
Jan
Feb
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
59,678.19
78,676.31
115,732.30
143,668.15
137,685.46
94,377.68
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
47,539.38
62,366.01
91,988.86
113,643.72
109,043.87
75,869.66
Of Total Collections
County Taxes
Mar
135,881.82
128,615.80
146,866.80
147,628.44
134,050.57
127,276.33
Jan
Feb
Apr
112,831.03
146,889.60
116,428.33
124,665.05
148,557.15
176,635.93
90,177.13
101,431.08
101,739.99
117,102.74
161,751.61
142,610.59
Mar
105,909.91
102,809.18
117,025.16
118,232.44
106,565.99
102,525.54
May
Apr
87,696.46
116,588.69
93,602.22
99,966.05
118,369.14
143,130.12
Jun
96,321.49
92,017.58
140,891.81
123,039.32
142,012.85
139,331.91
105,280.46
142,346.13
125,895.94
123,109.03
137,987.50
116,190.58
May
71,814.37
81,139.59
82,363.60
94,660.52
127,982.67
119,435.76
Jun
77,687.74
76,374.99
114,310.48
99,394.36
114,089.37
113,044.97
85,353.85
115,523.99
102,403.58
101,296.97
112,058.69
94,873.96
Jul
92,779.98
113,210.20
122,954.66
116,814.90
122,820.41
99,740.59
96,266.34
Aug
99,798.88
99,617.63
105,356.06
143,009.05
170,641.96
116,768.90
97,198.40
Jul
74,000.71
92,298.88
100,380.49
96,140.94
100,892.19
81,031.47
78,713.00
Aug
80,157.54
81,964.93
84,903.01
114,934.99
136,693.09
94,236.09
79,310.02
Jul
46.31%
49.60%
51.33%
49.30%
48.56%
44.96%
62.89%
59.82%
65.61%
Aug
52.39%
53.28%
51.04%
54.00%
56.62%
51.40%
63.59%
62.70%
63.87%
Current Year (2011) Ad Valorem Collections %
Jan
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
Feb
65.92%
68.51%
72.06%
75.42%
69.65%
74.67%
77.83%
76.99%
History of Past Due Mailings
6,379
Jan
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
#
6,042
Mar
84,233.87
96,355.94
104,656.71
114,734.32
114,077.68
#
Active Garnishments
Bankruptcies
Remaining Accts Receivable
Current Year AR (Taxes/Int)
**Red = AR Dollars
Garnishments Served by Mth
Garnishments Matured by Mth
One Year Ago
Accounts Receivable by Type
Active Garnishments
Bankruptcies
Remaining Accts Receivable
Current Year AR (Taxes/Int)
**Red = AR Dollars
Garnishments Served by Mth
Garnishments Matured by Mth
#
7,810
May
119,912.86
124,415.00
125,658.12
134,495.46
137,007.57
#
76.72%
81.22%
82.75%
83.27%
83.28%
84.88%
86.46%
87.55%
02/10/11
$$
471,356.74
Jun
127,180.60
140,069.44
143,902.71
154,241.50
158,391.01
Jun 2011
$$ Due Now
Jun
72.93%
75.90%
78.93%
79.80%
79.28%
81.44%
82.41%
83.82%
10/01/10
$$
388,149.72
Apr
109,037.61
120,189.92
140,299.87
147,713.65
148,750.88
May 2011
Accounts Receivable by Type
May
72.77%
76.30%
76.81%
79.35%
77.89%
79.62%
82.47%
84.39%
06/01/10
$$
409,871.61
Feb
82,034.34
88,380.58
96,624.23
103,750.93
104,861.62
Apr
72.48%
76.21%
78.07%
80.07%
76.05%
80.75%
82.47%
83.61%
03/01/10
#
Total Monthly Veh Billings
Mar
69.88%
71.75%
76.33%
78.59%
72.51%
78.26%
81.56%
82.41%
110,328.69
125,068.34
133,231.36
139,609.75
140,952.25
Jul 2011
$$ Due Now
#
#
5,540
$$
340,622.47
Jul
107,312.94
120,478.19
143,621.80
147,096.09
152,547.25
132,157.86
Aug
109,491.47
119,999.02
130,748.72
146,173.32
147,152.11
126,655.92
Aug 2011
$$ Due Now
#
$$ Due Now
170
12,042.25
166
11,958.85
158
11,858.58
198
1
5.12
1
5.15
1
5.18
1
14,785.09
5.21
2,315
140,430.09
3,628
211,509.83
7,979
444,886.23
7,433
414,489.22
6,935
378,681.08
6,232
334,268.26
2,353
124,102.70
3,065
164,684.73
9,421
531,158.54
10,027
557,742.09
10,491
580,852.69
10,697
593,964.25
-
-
-
-
-
-
50
3,661.45
-
-
-
-
-
-
50
3,661.45
May 2010
#
Jun 2010
$$ Due Now
#
Jul 2010
$$ Due Now
#
Aug 2010
$$ Due Now
#
$$ Due Now
500
32,547.41
541
34,555.46
596
38,649.97
492
5
367.70
5
369.79
5
371.88
5
33,625.95
373.97
1,917
125,130.61
3,188
202,206.26
6,073
375,518.29
5,733
353,953.98
5,909
365,980.72
4,753
289,039.28
2,206
129,399.22
3,045
181,498.97
8,331
524,026.44
8,487
526,170.79
8,880
543,939.36
9,275
569,452.87
91
5,329.51
140
7,529.79
171
10,512.06
5
921.95
62
3,370.59
102
5,642.98
126
7,987.21
5
927.91
Real Property Taxes
FY 2011-2012
(Total $$ Collections)
Jan
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
Of Total Collections
County Taxes & Late List
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Feb
313,652.81
307,485.71
477,271.59
1,555,214.99
668,463.89
445,472.77
Mar
740,139.07
379,919.02
361,778.44
332,904.08
313,235.43
449,982.63
Jan
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
Current Year Ad Valorem - 2011
August 31, 2011
Feb
256,020.32
255,249.25
382,989.15
1,301,068.53
545,377.88
356,497.68
Apr
332,344.50
360,236.26
243,148.97
173,894.09
218,036.11
306,315.81
May
132,854.57
261,656.33
131,934.01
103,614.43
178,097.47
103,893.23
Mar
Apr
Jun
142,607.79
87,022.22
145,103.87
101,440.48
135,565.80
171,399.92
132,015.62
149,915.40
144,764.28
92,036.48
99,256.26
94,007.06
May
Jun
571,966.13
299,943.51
288,841.07
270,157.60
248,758.10
364,618.02
256,151.14
278,799.08
193,174.13
133,618.10
174,023.97
247,875.78
101,065.71
189,446.64
99,314.46
78,986.40
135,349.05
83,544.85
104,729.42
63,406.87
107,874.15
72,638.39
111,677.89
138,753.30
95,416.97
112,505.37
104,520.34
71,653.77
73,463.10
70,311.83
Feb
90.64%
90.64%
89.23%
91.28%
92.71%
91.88%
91.88%
90.91%
91.20%
89.61%
Mar
92.35%
92.35%
91.26%
92.77%
93.76%
93.41%
94.31%
93.00%
93.91%
91.22%
Apr
92.95%
92.95%
92.70%
93.40%
94.32%
94.53%
95.09%
94.25%
95.06%
92.54%
May
93.57%
93.57%
93.11%
94.15%
94.78%
95.28%
95.85%
95.47%
95.74%
94.09%
Jun
94.09%
94.09%
93.78%
94.62%
95.25%
95.78%
96.43%
96.05%
96.66%
95.66%
Jul
78,897.91
64,025.06
75,012.59
82,074.70
284,567.14
52,974.73
58,888.18
Aug
1,033,340.38
698,291.83
562,659.35
1,509,823.05
1,310,396.82
1,152,305.43
1,286,770.17
Jul
53,103.02
47,746.47
52,118.13
61,341.51
228,499.71
36,851.87
42,348.90
Aug
840,543.63
560,283.83
460,019.34
1,218,671.84
1,083,649.84
923,498.88
1,051,972.16
Current Year (2011) Ad Valorem Collections %
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
Jan
86.61%
86.61%
87.03%
89.03%
90.58%
89.67%
88.20%
86.76%
87.84%
85.80%
Jul
Aug
7.87%
4.90%
4.47%
12.88%
12.95%
9.72%
11.83%
1.32%
3.58%
4.89%
Current Year (2011) Accounts Receivable Balance Remaining For County Taxes ONLY - Including Late Penalties
Jan
Year 2011
Feb
-
Mar
-
Apr
-
May
-
Jun
-
Jul
-
Aug
32,692.26
9,407,190.90
Year 2010
1,632,751.51
1,141,393.93
933,101.21
859,307.48
784,518.34
720,335.90
6,847.17
9,730,558.67
Year 2009
Year 2008
1,529,286.07
1,275,760.82
1,270,039.78
1,014,606.83
1,030,408.42
840,697.33
859,835.75
768,238.94
811,612.36
680,072.63
732,900.66
625,589.94
32,526.38
9,545,565.61
9,309,025.66
8,349,408.41
History of Past Due Mailings
03/01/10
#
Tax Scroll Billings
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
Utilities
06/01/10
3,877
$$
2,793,611.39
Tax Rate
0.767
0.767
0.894
0.894
0.894
0.894
0.875
County Tax
1,909,334.87
1,997,433.34
2,036,138.47
1,845,058.15
866,105.28
794,788.24
#
Active Garnishments
Accts with Agreements
Accts in Foreclosure
Bankruptcies
Remaining Accts Collectible
Current Year Ad Valorem(All)
**Red = AR Dollars
Taxed Value
1,323,056,075
1,327,866,369
1,074,350,757
1,067,095,405
1,057,504,045
1,031,311,772
1,011,277,231
County Tax
10,147,848.87
10,184,743.25
9,604,696.60
9,539,833.35
9,454,086.99
9,219,927.97
8,848,717.58
Late List
13,689.32
15,890.10
38,844.26
15,293.61
36,594.58
30,747.75
15,868.51
City Taxes
1,639,958.48
1,629,828.36
1,596,904.94
1,587,401.81
1,567,062.65
1,470,983.74
1,441,260.16
Fire Taxes
499,585.19
503,371.31
419,657.98
418,342.90
417,392.35
413,585.67
405,725.04
Total Billed
12,301,081.86
12,333,833.02
11,660,103.78
11,560,871.67
11,475,136.57
11,135,245.13
10,711,571.29
City Taxes
Fire Taxes
Balance owed on Debt Setoff(Call DSC239)
One Year Ago
Accounts Receivable by Type
110,638.22
102,680.57
104,766.86
36,424.77
34,170.91
36,058.48
Debt Setoff Letters Mailed
#
Jul 2011
$$ Due Now
#
Aug 2011
$$ Due Now
#
$$ Due Now
276
95,853.69
265
89,929.43
299
111,149.56
77
20,555.54
73
18,903.28
68
17,057.33
66
16,364.65
74
12,894.45
74
12,960.87
58
13,619.99
104
27,990.43
130
75,697.10
129
75,723.66
118
71,959.65
124
73,945.42
5,159
1,511,433.79
5,098
1,485,492.97
7,693
2,303,683.39
7,469
2,220,189.41
2,708
1,008,673.62
2,510
958,192.02
90
37,400.91
18,160
11,374,389.31
8,442
2,733,179.11
$$
8,160
2,647,126.49
$$
8,292
2,533,650.70
$$
26,222
13,824,028.78
$$
1
270.09
#
#
2
376.46
-
-
11
-
-
-
-
-
390,020.05
-
May 2010
387,897.28
-
Jun 2010
$$ Due Now
#
#
1,330.34
-
-
369,624.83
62
-
Jul 2010
$$ Due Now
#
29,747.92
366,173.91
Aug 2010
$$ Due Now
#
$$ Due Now
305
101,829.71
299
96,555.60
301
98,876.43
296
97,688.15
116
35,810.11
116
36,142.08
112
34,857.34
110
34,210.84
120
18,512.75
119
18,007.46
107
16,279.50
102
15,893.71
170
89,220.70
170
89,582.30
162
88,530.29
162
88,819.52
4,930
1,371,626.10
5,527
1,319,153.55
7,712
2,174,839.44
7,562
2,094,594.14
2,866
1,021,611.94
2,641
946,112.80
65
8,245.33
18,442
11,752,586.76
8,507
2,638,611.31
$$
8,872
2,505,553.79
$$
8,459
2,421,628.33
$$
26,674
14,083,793.12
$$
3,190.75
#
$$ Pd/Foreclosures/ by Mo
# Accts Given to ParaLegal
Garnishments Executed
2,116,119.76
2,193,751.66
2,221,824.64
2,633,879.17
1,029,092.53
903,172.96
103,924.61
#
Active Garnishments
Accts with Agreements
Accts in Foreclosure
Bankruptcies
Remaining Accts Collectible
Current Year Ad Valorem(All)
**Red = AR Dollars
$$
3,526,519.23
294
-
Debt Setoff Letters Mailed
4,771
Total Billed
Jun 2011
$$ Due Now
#
$$ Pd/Foreclosures/ by Mo
# Accts Given to ParaLegal
Garnishments Executed
02/10/11
$$
1,837,679.92
#
2,177
May 2011
Accounts Receivable by Type
11/10/10
$$
2,175,384.80
#
2,743
96,146.67
93,637.75
80,919.31
752,396.25
128,816.34
72,326.24
#
#
1,187.24
#
#
-
-
3
1
503.37
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
745.96
-
-
-
15
-
-
-
6,857.03
-
Bankruptcies
Remaining Accts Receivable
Current Year AR (Taxes/Int)
**Red = AR Dollars
Garnishments Served by Mth
Garnishments Matured by Mth
5
367.70
5
369.79
5
371.88
5
373.97
1,917
125,130.61
3,188
202,206.26
6,073
375,518.29
5,733
353,953.98
5,909
365,980.72
4,753
289,039.28
2,206
129,399.22
3,045
181,498.97
8,331
524,026.44
8,487
526,170.79
8,880
543,939.36
9,275
569,452.87
91
5,329.51
140
7,529.79
171
10,512.06
5
921.95
62
3,370.59
102
5,642.98
126
7,987.21
5
927.91
Budget Expense Report and Fund Balance Update: Approved as follows:
Fund Balance Calculation
As of 08-31-11
Available Fund Balance
Cash & Investments (General)
Cash & Investments (22 Fund)
Less Cash from General (other funds)
Less Liabilites (w/out deferred revenue)
Less Deferred Revenue (from cash receipts)
Less Encumbrances
Last Year
Two Months
Last
Same Month
Ago
Month
Now
As of
08/31/10
As of
06/30/11
As of
07/31/11
As of
08/31/11
$
$
$
$
$
$
6,779,246
8,840
123,782
(53,476)
(102,249)
$
6,756,142 $
8,838,852 $
7,717,047 $
8,018,641
General Fund Expenditures
Total Expenditures (Adopted Budget)
$
26,226,323 $
26,226,323 $
28,090,574 $
28,090,574
Total Available for Appropriation
Total Available
Total Expenditures
$
$
6,756,142 $
26,226,323 $
8,838,852 $
26,226,323 $
7,717,047 $
28,090,574 $
8,018,641
28,090,574
Total Available
$
$
$
$
$
$
9,463,793
11,353
(384,061)
(52,979)
(199,254)
$
$
$
$
$
$
7,875,289
11,604
127,402
(52,979)
(244,269)
$
$
$
$
$
$
8,326,010
11,854
131,003
(52,979)
(397,247)
Total % Available Fund Balance
25.76%
33.70%
27.47%
28.55%
Available Fund Balance Requirement
Per LGC
8%
$2,098,106
8%
$2,098,106
8%
$2,247,246
8%
$2,247,246
17.76%
4,658,036 $
25.70%
6,740,746 $
19.47%
5,469,801 $
20.55%
5,771,395
% Undesignated Fund Balance
$
Sheriff Budget Amendment: To re-appropriate unspent funds from fund balance from FY
2010-2011 for the Equity Sharing Forfeiture Fund for the Sheriff’s Department to be spent on the
Governor’s Highway Safety Grant Program in FY 2011-2012.
AMENDMENT
Anson County Budget Ordinance FY 2011/12
BE IT ORDAINED by the Anson County Board of Commissioners that the FY 2011/12 Budget
Ordinance be amended as follows:
Section 1. Expenditures:
Increase:
11-4310-4320 Sheriff/ Jail
$
453
Total Increase:
$
453
Section 2. Revenues:
Increase:
11-4110 Governing Body-General Administration
$
453
Total Increase:
$
453
Adopted this 12th day of September, 2011.
Social Services Budget Amendment: To re-appropriate unspent funds from 2010-2011 FY
from Federal Recovery ARRA Grant Food Stamps to be spent in the 2011-2012 FY at Anson County Social
Services Department.
AMENDMENT
Anson County Budget Ordinance FY 2011/12
BE IT ORDAINED by the Anson County Board of Commissioners that the FY 2011/12 Budget
Ordinance be amended as follows:
Section 1. Expenditures:
Increase:
11-5310-5580 Social Services
$ 19,775
Total Increase:
$ 19,775
Section 2. Revenues:
Increase:
11-5310 Social Services Administration
$
19,775
Total Increase:
$
19,775
Adopted this 12th day of September, 2011.
Public Schools- CO Budget Amendment: To appropriate funds from the North Carolina Core
Banking System School Lottery Funds for School Repairs/Renovations to be done in FY 2011—12
AMENDMENT
Anson County Budget Ordinance FY 2011/12
BE IT ORDAINED by the Anson County Board of Commissioners that the FY l2011/12 Budget
Ordinance be amended as follows:
Section 1. Expenditures:
Increase:
11-5912 Public Schools CO
$
18,800
Total Increase:
$
18,800
Section 2. Revenues:
Increase:
11-5912 Public Schools – CO
$
18,800
Total Increase:
$
18,800
Adopted this 12th day of September, 2011.
Public Schools – CO Budget Amendment: To re-appropriate unspent funds from 2010-2011
FY from the North Carolina Core Banking System School Lottery Funds for School Repairs/Renovations
done in 2011-1=2012 FY.
AMENDMENT
Anson County Budget Ordinance FY 2011/12
BE IT ORDAINED by the Anson County Board of Commissioners that the FY 2011/12 Budget
Ordinance be amended as follows:
Section 1. Expenditures:
Increase:
11-5912 Public Schools – CO
$ 126,007
Total Increase:
$ 126,007
Section 2. Revenues:
Increase:
11-5912 Public Schools – CO
$ 126,007
Total Increase:
$ 126,007
Adopted this 12th day of September, 2011.
11/12.
Sheriff/Jail Budget Amendment: To align COPS Grants to actual remaining balance for FY
AMENDMENT
Anson County Budget Ordinance FY 2011/12
BE IT ORDAINED by the Anson County Board of Commissioners that the FY 2011/12 Budget
Ordinance be amended as follows:
Section 1. Expenditures:
Increase:
11-4310-4320 Sheriff/Jail
$
2,400
Increase:
11-4310-4320 Sheriff/Jail
$
2,913
Increase:
11-4310-4320 Sheriff/Jail
Total Increase:
Section 2. Revenues:
Increase:
11-4310-4320 Sheriff/Jail
Increase:
11-4310-4320 Sheriff/Jail
Increase:
11-4310-4320 Sheriff/Jail
Total Increase:
Adopted this 12th day of September, 2011.
$ 125,019
$ 130,332
$
2,400
$
2,913
$ 125,019
$ 130,332
Health Department Budget Amendment: To correct Kate B. Reynolds Budget unspent
balance for FY 2011/2012 to reflect additional payments made in FY 2010/2011.
AMENDMENT
Anson County Budget Ordinance FY 2011/12
BE IT ORDAINED by the Anson County Board of Commissioners that the FY 2011/12 Budget
Ordinance be amended as follows:
Section 1. Expenditures:
Decrease:
11-5110-5181 Health Programs
$
(6,384)
Total Decrease:
$
(6,384)
Section 2. Revenues:
Decrease:
11-4110 Governing Body-General Administration
$
(6,384)
Total Decrease:
$
(6,384)
Adopted this 12th day of September, 2011.
Social Services Budget Amendment: To appropriate funding from the Federal TANF
Contingency Funds for the TANF Job Boost II Program at the Anson County Department of Social
Services.
AMENDMENT
Anson County Budget Ordinance FY 2011/12
BE IT ORDAINED by the Anson County Board of Commissioners that the FY 2011/12 Budget
Ordinance be amended as follows:
Section 1. Expenditures:
Increase:
11-5310-5580 Social Services
$ 140,250
Total Increase:
$ 140,250
Section 2. Revenues:
Increase:
11-5310 Social Services Administration
$ 14,2500
Total Increase:
$ 140,250
Adopted this 12th day of September, 2011.
Parks and Recreation Budget Amendment: To recognize a donation from Specialized Media
Services for athletic supplies at Anson County Parks and Recreation Department.
AMENDMENT
Anson County Budget Ordinance FY 2011/12
BE IT ORDAINED by the Anson County Board of Commissioners that the FY 2011/12 Budget
Ordinance be amended as follows:
Section 1. Expenditures:
Increase:
11-6120 Parks and Recreation
$
1,000
Total Increase:
$
1,000
Section 2. Revenues:
Increase:
11-6120 Parks and Recreation
$
1,000
Total Increase:
$
1,000
Adopted this 12th day of September, 2011.
ACTS Transportation Budget Amendment: To appropriate additional ROAP funding from
the Public Transportation Division of the North Carolina Department of Transportation for the Anson
County Transportation System for the Elderly, Work First and Rural Public Programs.
AMENDMENT
Anson County Budget Ordinance FY 2011/12
BE IT ORDAINED by the ad Board of Commissioners that the FY 2011/12 Budget Ordinance be
amended as follows:
Section 1. Expenditures:
Increase:
11-4521-4523 Transportation
$
13,591
Increase:
11-4521-4523 Transportation
$
12,973
Increase:
11-4521-4523 Transportation
$
16,382
Total Increase:
$
42,946
Section 2. Revenues:
Increase:
11-3452 Transportation – DOT Reimb
$
13,591
Increase:
11-3452 Transportation – DOT Reimb
$
12,973
Increase:
11-3452 Transportation – DOT Reimb
$
16,382
Total Increase:
$
42,946
Adopted this 12th day of September, 2011.
Hornwood Sewer Project Budget Amendment: Appropriate funding from Water Fund
Balance to cover Hall contracting invoices for Fund 41 Hornwood Waterline Project until we receive the
funds from NC Rural Center. Funds will be returned to Water Fund Balance once all paperwork is
processed with NC Rural Center and payments have been received by the County.
AMENDMENT
Anson County Budget Ordinance FY 2011/12
BE IT ORDAINED by the Anson County Board of Commissioners that the FY 2011/12 Budget
Ordinance be amended as follows:
Section 15. Expenditures:
Increase:
Distribution – Water
$ 144,680
Total Increase:
$ 144,680
Section 16. Revenues:
Increase:
Fund Balance Appropriated Water
$ 144,680
Total Increase:
$ 144,680
Adopted this 12th day of September, 2011.
Water Department Distribution Budget Amendment: Appropriate funding from Water
Fund Balance to cover Hall Contracting invoices for Fund 41 Hornwood Waterline Project until we receive
the funds from NC Rural Center. Funds will be returned to Water Fund Balance once all paperwork is
processed with NC Rural Center and payments have been received by the County.
AMENDMENT
Anson County North Carolina 2007 North Carolina Rural Center Grant, Golden Leaf Foundation Grant,
North Carolina Commerce Grant
BE IT ORDAINED by the Anson County Board of Commissioners that pursuant to Section 13.2
of Chapter 159 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the following grant ordinance is hereby
adopted:
Section 3. Expenditures:
Increase:
Hornwood Sewer-Georgia Pacific Line Addition
$ 144,680
Total Increase:
$ 144,680
Section 3. Revenues:
Increase:
Hornwood Sewer-Georgia Pacific Line Addition
$ 144,680
Total Increase:
$ 144,680
Adopted this 12th day of September, 2011.
Resolution – Governor’s Highway Safety Program: Approved as follows:
North Carolina Governor’s Highway Safety Program
LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Anson County Sheriff’s Office (herein called the “Agency”) has completed an
application contract for traffic safety funding; and that Anson County Board of Commissioners (herein
called the “Governing Body”) has thoroughly considered the problem identified and has reviewed the
project as described in the contract;
THEREFORE, OW BE IT RESOLVED BY THE Anson County Board of Commissioners in open
meeting assembled in the City of Wadesboro, North Carolina this 12th day of September, 2011 as follows:
1. That the project referenced above is in the best interest of the Governing Body and the
General public; and
2. That Tommy W. Allen, Jr. is authorized to file, on behalf of the Governing Body, an application
contract in the form prescribed by the Governor’s Highway Safety Program for federal funding in the
amount of $22,913 to be made to the Governing Body to assist in defraying the cost of the project
described in the contract application; and
3. That the Governing Body ash formally appropriated the cash contribution of $22,913 as
required by the project contract; and
4. That the Project Director designated in the application contract shall furnish or make
arrangement for other appropriate persons to furnish such information, data, documents and repots as
required by the contract, if approved, or as may be required by the Governor’s Highway Safety Program;
and
5. That certified copies of this resolution be included as part of the contract referenced above;
and
6. That this resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
DONE AND ORDERED in open meeting by Anna H. Baucom, Chairman and attested by Bonnie M.
Huntley, CMC, NCCCC, Clerk to the Board this 12th day of September, 2011.
Resolution – Support of Anson FSA:
RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT
WHEREAS, it has come to our attention that due to budget constraints the State Executive
Director has ruled that the Anson County FSA office will “Share Management” with the Richmond County
FSA office; and
WHEREAS, approximately 2200 farms are recorded with Anson FSA and approximately 500
farms receive annual payments from Anson FSA; and
WHEREAS, 1800 persons are eligible to receive payments from Anson FSA and approximately
800 people are receiving payments from Anson FSA; and
WHEREAS, Anson FSA issues approximately $1.6 million to Anson County producers annually,
and
WHEREAS, Anson and Richmond FSA Offices have only 3 producers in common and Richmond
County does not have a tractor dealership or a fertilizer supplier making a shared management
arrangement an undue hardship on farmers in Anson County; and
WHEREAS, most of the farming in Anson County is in the northern and western parts of the
county, it would be more convenient and sensible for a shared management arrangement to be with
Stanly or Union counties with Stanly being the preferred arrangement;
NOW, THEREFORE, we respectfully request reconsideration of the current plan to abandon
services in Anson County and asked that if shared management is the only option to transfer shared
management for the Anson County FSA office to Stanly or Union County.
Adopted this 12th day of September, 2011.
Proclamation 2011 Child Passenger Safety Week:
Proclamation
WHEREAS,
despite ongoing efforts to better protect child passengers in cars, motor vehicle crashes
are the leading cause of death for children from 3 to 14 years old; and
WHEREAS,
in 2009, 1,314 children ages 14 and under died and an estimated 179,000 were injured
in motor vehicle crashes; and
WHEREAS,
riding unrestrained is the greatest risk factor for death and injury among child occupants
of motor vehicles; and
WHEREAS,
almost half of the children who die in crashes are completely unrestrained; and
WHEREAS,
nearly 3 out of 4 child safety seats are not used correctly; and
WHEREAS,
child safety seats and safety belts, when installed and used correctly, can prevent injuries
and save lives, reducing the risk of death by as much as 71 percent; and
WHEREAS,
an estimated 9, 310 lives were saved by child restraints from 1975 to 2009; and
WHEREAS,
children can also be injured in non-traffic-related incidents in and around cars, such as
being unattended in a motor vehicle, being injured by a vehicle back over; or being
entrapped in car’s trunk; and
WHEREAS,
during Child Passenger Safety Week 2011, Safe Kids USA and its nationwide coalition
network, with the support of sponsor General Motors, will be holding hundreds of vehicle
safety events for families during the month of September, including events on September
24th for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s National Seat Check
Saturday; and
WHEREAS,
Safe Kids USA will be communicating the importance of increasing proper restraint
practices for children, such as keeping kids under age 2 rear-facing in their child safety
seats; increasing top tether use for children who weigh 40-48 pounds in forward-facing
car seats; and ensuring older kids stay in booster seats until they are seat belt ready
(4’9”, between ages 8-12 or between 80-100 pounds); and
WHEREAS,
Safe Kids Anson has planned a car seat inspection for Child Passenger Safety Week
2011’s National Seat Check Saturday in an effort to educate families about the
importance of properly restraining their children on each and every ride.
NOW, THEREFORE, We, the Anson County Board of Commissioners, do hereby proclaim September 1824, 2011 as
CHILD PASSENGER SAFETY WEEK
in Anson County, and call upon all the residents of this county to join with us in supporting the efforts
and activities of Safe Kids Anson to prevent motor vehicle-related injuries and deaths to our children.
Adopted this 12th day of September, 2011.
Appointments:
Tourism Development Authority: Motion by Commissioner Woodburn,
seconded by Commissioner Spencer, to approve the appointment of Steve Bailey to the
Tourism Development Authority. Motion carried unanimously.
Hampton B. Allen Library: Motion by Commissioner Sims, seconded by
Commissioner Woodburn, to approve the re-appointment of Lula Jackson and Leslie
Capell to the Library Advisory Board. Commissioner Sims commented that they both
were currently serving and doing a wonderful job. Motion carried unanimously.
Appointment Region F Aging Advisory Committee: Motion by
Commissioner Woodburn, seconded by Commissioner Spencer, to approve the
appointment of Joanne Clark to the Region F Aging Advisory Committee. Chairman
Baucom commented that Ms. Clark provides amazing service to seniors helping with
Medicare and taxes at Grace Center. Motion carried unanimously.
Commissioner Concerns:
Commissioner Sikes asked for an update on GIS. Randy Gulledge felt there
was some misunderstanding about what was going on. Mr. Gulledge stated that we
intended to go to Version 10 so that was installed October of last year and in March of
this year the old version on the website crashed. Mr. Gulledge shared that they
recovered data and made a decision not to fix the old version but to push ahead with
the new version. Mr. Gulledge stated that they found they needed the old version
because people were used to it and they needed that data so they have gone back to
try to fix the old version. Mr. Gulledge stated that as they discover errors in the old
software they can put that recovered data back in the old one and keep moving forward
with the new version at the same time. Mr. Gulledge stated that there was so much
traffic in the daytime this could only be done at night. Mr. Gulledge stated that
tomorrow he would do some quality control in the Assessor’s office and if the data looks
rights that would cover all the edits through the end of March and there were only
about fifteen after that and they would be completely up to date. Mr. Gulledge shared
that they would soon have three running so all the complaints would stop.
Commissioner Sikes asked if the laptops in the deputy cars were running off this system
with Mr. Gulledge answering it was data extracted from the old version and with the
new version the data would be extracted and put in and they would have the same
stuff as in the GIS. Mr. Gulledge added that another problem found with GIS was there
was really not a good work flow because the address gets uploaded into the CAD
software for 911 dispatchers but there was really not a work flow to get that into GIS
so the Assessor’s office could have current addresses. Mr. Gulledge added that Version
10 would fix all of this. Commissioner Sikes mention an incident a few weeks ago
regarding stolen property in the Ansonville area and two deputies were trying to work
on their laptops in their cars and one commented that even though he was in Ansonville
it was showing that his car was at his home in Richmond County. Mr. Gulledge stated
that the hardware in the trunk was called a blue tree modem serviced by Alltel and it
gives data to the modem so they can connect back to us and it was also equipped with
GPS. Vice Chair Streater asked how many county vehicles were equipped with GPS
with Mr. Gulledge answering the target for the Sheriff’s office was 28. Mr. Gulledge
shared that no one else had asked for any but there was one vehicle at Waste Water
using it for data. Vice Chair Streater asked if it would help if other vehicles were
equipped with Mr. Gulledge feeling this would be the benefit of having GIS done
correctly in Version 10 so all the data was integrated. Mr. Gulledge added that the
SCADA system that reports pressure in waterlines could be dropped into GIS and it
would indicate on the screen any malfunction. Board members agreed this was
needed.
Commissioner Woodburn referred to the consultation with the attorney asking if
anything was expected of the board or if it was by acclamation. County Manager
Gatewood stated that he took the assignment to get with the County Attorney.
Motion by Vice Chair Streater, seconded by Commissioner Woodburn, to adjourn.
Motion carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted:
Bonnie M. Huntley, CMC, NCCCC
Clerk to the Board
Meeting time: