What is the Risk-Free Rate in a risky environment ? Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Meeting Frankfurt, February 2012 Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 1 Summary • • • • • The purpose of this presentation What is a Risk-Free Rate? Why do we need one? Why are we re-examining it now? What would it look like? Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 2 The purpose of this presentation • The Risk-Free Rate (Rf) is everywhere in finance • Part of its definition is that it be default-risk free • That virtue is increasingly rare • But there were always many other fundamental problems Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 3 The purpose of this presentation • In this presentation I want to – Examine the problems that always existed – Examine the problems which have come to the fore • As a result of the financial crisis – Suggest some ways forward – Ask for help! Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 4 What is a Risk-Free Rate? • A Risk-Free Rate is one in which – Expected Returns and – Actual Returns – Are indeed and always will be – Equal • i.e. there is no variance around the expected return • Generally this therefore means an asset that is – Fixed-rate, and – Default-free Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 5 What is a Risk-Free Rate? • The maturity of the Risk-Free Rate – should match the horizon of the asset being valued/matched/hedged • This can be short-term – E.g. Options • Medium-term – E.g. Building contracts • Infinite – E.g. Equity/Corporate valuations Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 6 What is a Risk-Free Rate? • So the Risk-Free Rate used in valuation – will depend upon when the cash flow being valued is expected to occur – It may therefore vary across time • Of both observation • And Maturity Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 7 What is a Risk-Free Rate? • The maturity constraint means that we need to add another condition to the Risk-Free Rate: – For the expected value to have no variance – There cannot be any reinvestment risk • So the Risk-Free Rate must be a single payment – i.e. it must have a zero-coupon format • It also implies that there is not so much A single Risk-Free Rate, • but a whole Risk-Free Curve (Rfc) Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 8 What is a Risk-Free Rate? • In summary therefore : – The Rf must be • A single payment instrument • Of the suitable maturity • Free of any credit/default risk – It may also need to be replicable • But this is not an essential characteristic • In ALL the uses of Rf Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 9 Why do we need one? • The Risk-Free Rate is a variable used in numerous areas of finance: – – – – Equity Valuation Portfolio Performance Measurement Option Valuation Insurance (MCEV for liabilities) • It generally serves the role of evaluating what alternative return could be guaranteed – In a given situation • Some examples follow Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 10 Rf in Equity Valuation Models Model CAPM APM Multi factor Expected Return E(R) = Rf + (Rm- Rf) Inputs Needed Risk-Free Rate Beta relative to market portfolio Market Risk Premium E(R) = Rf + j=1j (Rj- Rf) Risk-Free Rate; # of Factors; Betas relative to each factor Factor risk premiums E(R) = Rf + j=1,,Nj (Rj- Rf) Risk-Free Rate; Macro factors Betas relative to macro factors Macro economic risk premiums Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Aswath Source: Feb 2012 Damodaran 11 Rf in Option Valuation • The Black-Scholes Formula: A Call Option price C is given by Where and Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 12 Why are we re-examining it now? • It has become readily apparent to anyone who has noticed what is happening – That assuming that government issues are default risk free cannot be justified • There has been increasing press and other comments to that effect – E.g. Press : Gillian Tett in the FT – Official Institutions: The IMF – Investment Managers : BlackRock • And many others! Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 13 Why are we re-examining it now? • But there were plenty of questions before too! • E.g Some Govies were said to be TOO expensive – To be simply the default-Risk-Free Rate • Various Govies benefited from – – – – Tax-exemptions Eligibility for repo Greater liquidity Regulatory requirements: • Holdings for solvency or reserve purposes • Not all Govie markets have strips – I.e. Zero-coupon cash flows values have to be derived Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 14 Why are we re-examining it now? • Why not Govies, even then ? – Govies frequently had added advantages – Beyond simply being considered free of default risk • A bond yield decomposes into – – – – A Risk-Free Rate A Default/Credit Risk A Liquidity Premium/Discount A Convenience Factor • Govies may not have default risk, but they have a liquidity discount and a convenience factor • Both of these mean that Govies would underestimate the Rf Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 15 Why are we re-examining it now? • Note that there is an argument that governments can (or need) never default – On their domestic debt – in their own currency • This is probably practically true – Though only reasonably certain (legally) if the issuer is the same as the printer of currency • But note that equally practically – Even the ECB can lend to banks – And accept only Govie debt in collateral Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 16 Why are we re-examining it now? • Although this was not really the most satisfactory method….. • It is clear that in the past – You simply looked up the relevant Risk-Free Rate • A government bond yield (or better: a zero) • LIBOR or some similar rate • Even Swaps • But in the present Govies no longer look so default risk-free • And we are increasingly aware of the problems with LIBOR and Swaps Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 17 Some Questions • Can we really consider Govies an appropriate Risk-Free Rate today? • Is the concept of “risk free” even appropriate or relevant in today’s world? • If not, then what happens to CAPM, portfolio theory, BS model? Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 18 Some Considerations • Horses for Courses: – The Rf should be fit for purpose/use – And there are many purposes/uses • There is probably room for more than one Rf curve • Just as there is room for more than one yield curve (across the same set of points) Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 19 Some Considerations • Some Rf uses require replicability – The Rf therefore needs to be observable • And TRADEABLE • Other Rf uses may not have that requirement – And therefore the Rf in those uses may be unobservable – But derived from observable data Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 20 Some Considerations • Spurious accuracy! • Whatever method is chosen to obtain a Rf, – Whether directly observed (replicable) – Or derived (unobservable) • The Rf (and the Rfc) will be changing more or less constantly • Even if based on observed rates most of the Rfc will be unobserved • And based on some curve-modeling technique • So to what degree of accuracy do we need the Rf ? Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 21 What would it look like? • • • • I do not propose a specific solution We are all looking for answers But I can outline some necessary dimensions And suggest some key parameters Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 22 What would it look like? • The key dimensions that have to be examined in determining a Risk-Free Rate : – Theoretically Sound Concept – Computationally Tractable – Based on clean data inputs • Available in real time – (Possibly) Replicable Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 23 Some Suggestions • Based on the swap curve – adjusted for credit risk and a liquidity premium • But the concept implies determining what the credit risk is • Which is self-referential – i.e. if we know what the credit risk is…… • Implied by the Cash-CDS Arbitrage – CDS is close to pure credit risk – Especially if it is CCP settled Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 24 Advantages of the Swap Curve • • • • It exists in almost all currencies It is easy to build It is always current It is mandated for insurance in Holland – (Although this may be a disadvantage….) • And it is proposed for Solvency II purposes Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 25 Disadvantages of the Swap Curve • Adjustment required for Credit Risk – Academia uses spread between secured and unsecured rates • i.e. compares with the repo rate for equivalent maturity – But this method has problems too • Convenience • Liquidity – On the other hand do collateralised swaps need a credit adjustment? Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 26 Disadvantages of the Swap Curve • The Floating leg (3-mo LIBOR) – Is not extensively traded – Could be (and probably has been) manipulated • The current definition for LIBOR makes the rate conceptual • Rather than an actual rate which can be tested Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 27 Why Use CDS vs Cash? • Inasmuch as CDS capture a credit risk spread • That spread should be over the credit-risk free curve – Counterparty-risk can be mitigated • Empirical observations show that this spread • Is over neither the Swap, nor the Govie curve Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 28 Why Use CDS vs Cash? • i.e. (With all other things being equal) => • CBY – SR < CDS < CBY – GBY • Where – CBY = Cash Bond Yield – SR = Swap Rate – GBY = Government Bond Yield • In other words the implied risk-free curve • Lies BETWEEN the Govie Curve and the Swap Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 29 Why Use CDS vs Cash? • In principle there is only one Risk-Free Curve – Irrespective of the reference names used • So any CDS/Cash Bond pair should be usable – And as “information valuable” as any other • There are an extremely large number of reference names in the CDS market – But using those contained in the CDX and iTraxx “Main” indices are the most liquid – Europe iTraxx has 3, 5 ,7 and 10 year maturities Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 30 What to do? • The EBC will be examining the question further • Sergey Smirnoff and I will head that effort • We will want help: – Thoughts/suggestions – Data – Feedback Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 31 What to do? • If you interested, please contact us by e-mail – Chairman@EFFAS-EBC.org – SergeySmirnoff@EFFAS-EBC.org Thank you for listening ! Chris Golden EFFAS-EBC/DVFA Frankfurt Feb 2012 32