Open Letter to Mr. Adam Smith, Editor-in-Chief, Nobelprize.org.
“The Big Bang” theory is really “a Big Speculation”.
Through this letter I want to express my gratitude towards the Nobel Foundation
because it awarded in 2006, two exceptional American researchers (Mr. John Mather
and Mr. George Smoot), whose measurements regarding the anysothropy of cosmic
background radiations (CBR), which validated from 1989 the Global Unifying
Pattern (GUP) of interactions and fundamental physical particles, published by
myself in 1984-1989 (preliminary trials), and in 2004 – the preliminary synthesis
(Subatomic Universe, ISBN 973-0-03716-7).
In the book, I showed that cosmic background radiations are really Universe's Basic
Temperature (an Universe with behavior of “black body”), being continuously
transmitted and absorbed by all atomic-molecular structures anysothropically
dispersed throughout the unlimited space.
The fluctuations in the CBR (Sachs Wolfe effects), inform us that in the Universe, the
atomic-molecular structures are permanently desintegrated as cosmic radiation in
many places, and the cosmic radiation is integrated as atomo-molecular structures
(with kinetic clustering effect), in other places (a fluctuating process).
By expounding the book on-line (free download), at www.adslexpress.ro/soma (an
adaptation to the transition of the Internet age from the p-book to the e-book!), I
founded a new research field, called “Global Science Engineering”(GSE).
Besides, GSE is also a new research method.
The classic research method means stating a hypothesis on the researched
phenomenon, then performing numerous experiments, in order to prove that
hypothesis valid (Lottery Method).
GSE aims to the research of all quantity results obtained by scientists (through the
lottery method), irrespective of time and place, and their integration in a coherent and
unitary value system, according to the laws of nature, aprioristic validated through
experiments, without making an appeal to various hypotheses (Engineering Method).
The two methods are not mutually exclusive, they are complementary.
Chronologically speaking, the engineering method can only be used after the
gathering of enough experimental data (i.e. a critical mass of them), obtainable only
through the lottery method.
With the engineering method, instead of stating a hypothetic function and then look
for experimental points to confirm it, we go the inverse way: we place on the board all
-1/5-
our known experimental points, then look for one or more functions/ecuations that
could satisfy all of them simultaneously, in a global unifying system.
In “Subatomic Universe” I applied the engineering method and obtained more than
50 new equations, and over 150 new physical constants, integrated in a global,
unifying system (GUP), able to explain, in both quantity and quality, some physical
phenomenon met in nature, such as: gravity, inertia, relativity effects, quantic
effects, electricity and magnetism, strong nuclear forces and weak electro forces,
photonic radiations/light, heat, subatomic particles, the birth of the Universe, the
progressive heating of Earth's surface, etc.
During the 2006 year, I have been trying to launch an international development
programme on this specific field. (So far I understand that being an European, I stand
no real chance of getting any kind of support from European institutions,
organisations or foundations!).
The publicity of the work was done through a letter sent to over 15.000 scientists
throughout the world, both directly via e-mail and indirectly, as a distinct action,
through the WYP2005 – Steering (National and International) Committees, under
UNESCO's coordination.
The Nobel Foundation's editorial, concerning the award of the two American
researchers seems to promote the false idea that NASA measurements might confirm
the Big Bang theory concerning the birth of our Universe.
This theory (entirely dominant for the last 50 years) considers that initially, in one
point of the Universe (where the Earth is now), the matter was concentrated, its mass
equaling the mass of all the galaxies in the Universe, structured as neutron-protonic
plasma, of very small dimensions and very high mass density, which at a t=0 moment
exploded. The hypothesis does not give us any idea about the mechanism to form that
plasma, about the cause and the mechanism of the so called explosion that would have
given birth to the galaxies of the Universe, or about how (atomic) radiations shaped in
protons, electrons and photons, the stars, and the black holes have could to separate
themselves from the gravity field of such black hole/(big plasma), with a very large
mass. The black holes have only in our own galaxy a mass percentage of 71%.
A “Hiroshima” explosion implies the existence of a high concentration of atoms of
heavy elements in the hypothetic initial plasma.
In order for a proton or another matter structure, with an mex mass, to be able to leave
the periphery of the initial plasma, at the moment of the hypothetic explosion,
-2/5-
surpassing the opponent gravity, it needed a launching speed, vex, thousand times
bigger that the speed of light c.
Let us presume, for the sake of reason, that the mass of the hypothetic plasma equaled
only 2% of our galaxy's mass, Mcp=2x1041kg, [1] then the relation between the
movement energy of the emitted/radiated mass (½)mexvex2, and the energy of the
(capture) gravity field, at an R distance reported to the center of the plasma at the
moment of the explosion: (1/2)mex.vex2>G.Mcp.mex/R, [2] may be written as:
(vex/c) 2>2.G.Mcp/c2R, [3] where G=6.67x10-11 N.m2/kg2 , [4].
The following table (which obviously proves the inconsistency of the Big Bang theory)
shows, for a few values of the R distance, what the speed of the emitted proton should
have been in ratio to the speed of light, in order for the proton to leave the plasma at
the t=0+ moment, of the hypothetic explosion.
R [m] :
103
104
105
106
107
108
vex/c>
5.44x105
1.72x105
5.44x104
1.72x104
5.44x103
1.72x103
To assert that the universal attraction has as a result, the mutual moving away of
bodies (Expanding Universe), not their clustering (Clustering Universe, according to
the GUP), means to accept the false, but widely accepted 500 years ago, academic
idea, that said the Sun revolved around the Earth, not inverse.
The apparent deviation to red of the photons originating from distant galaxies,
obviously cannot be proof of the expansion of the Universe, as such a hypothesis is
invalidated by the law of universal attraction.
The deviation to red, noticed by Hubble, which seems to be in proportion to the
Galaxy-Earth distance,
tells us that to the such effect may contribute both the mechanic work commited by
photon to escape from the galaxy's gravity field (the Einstein effect, dependent on the
mass of the source galaxy), and the propagation route, populated with radiations and
other “lazy” structures, such as the cosmic background radiation, or the cosmic
Hydrogen and Helium atoms, which put a certain break through the successive
interactions.
If we had very sensitive devices, we could measure the deviation to red of the photons
from the Sun, as the Sun – Earth distance increases during a part of its trajectory, from
-3/5-
the Perihelion to the Aphelion. Such a measurement cannot be the proof of expanding
of the Solar System! Similar relative movements, around black holes, might also take
place between our Galaxy and other ditant Galaxies.
After the discovery of the cosmic background radiation by Penzias and Wilson, in
1964, the redshift of the galactic photons can no longer be a support to the Big Bang
speculating theory.
Its sustainment today, seems to aim to the continuous attraction of financial funds
from governments, foundations and private sponsors, in damage to the sure results
research, which could shortly be put to the service of life on our planet, more and
more endangered (new energy sources, stopping the temperature growth on the
surface of the Earth, the control of atmosphere perturbances, the control of cells in
cancer and AIDS cases, the control of explosives, etc.)
Probably for many years from now, NASA and other scientific organisations will
waste Time and public money, on experiments that will confirm the truths proven in
the “Subatomic Universe” book, sent to all those interested, with the WYP-2005
actions.
For instance: the recent Chinese experiment regarding the EAST reactor fusion, called
“the artificial sun”, where deuterium and tritium atoms fusioned for just 3 seconds, at
100 million Celsius degrees, obtained with high power lasers.
A lot of public resources could have been saved and put to better use, if the Chinese
scientists had taken into account the Global Unifying Pattern in physics, where the
importance of both simultaneous fields: gravity and thermal, is demonstrated.
An “artificial sun” needs, beside the Sun thermal field, a quasi-constant artificial
gravity field, of about 330 m/s2, equal to the one on the surface of the Sun.
It is reasonable that both “on fusion” projects (the Chinese and the European), be
implemented after the attainment of technology able to sustain on Earth a quasiconstant gravity field, about 33 times bigger than the natural one, should this ever be
possible!
It would be better for everybody, I am thinking, if an adequate part of the science
disposable funds will be distributed to the new research field (GUP) too, in the each
country, and also if the mass-media will encourage such behavior, often painful for
many prisoners of fake scientific hypothesis.
I would greatly appreciate it if you could approve publication of my Open Letter in
the your impressive magazine, as reply to your article, in proceeds to the other
-4/5-
scientist, sponsors and science oragnization/institution, that are interested in this
matter, as well as in my “GLOBAL SCIENCE” program.
Thank you very much in advance.
Iulian Somacescu
EuroTehnoConsult, Science Department
15 Sf.Elefterie street
050523 - Bucharest
ROMANIA
Tf/Fax: ++40214108345;
e-mail: soma@clicknet.ro
www.adslexpress.ro/soma
-5/5-