5-Volume Set
Migration
CRITICAL CONCEPTS IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES
Edited and with a new introduction by Steven Vertovec,
Max Planck Institute, Germany
Nowadays, migration seems never far from the top of the political agenda.
Whether as a consequence of civil and ethnic unrest, or as one response to the
widening gulf between the wealthy and poor zones of the world, international
population movement for sanctuary or settlement has become as prevalent as
increased capital flows. (Indeed, for many commentators, there is a clear
connection between the fluidity of population movements and the economic
and technological changes that have generated ‘globalization’.)
According to UN estimates, the global stock of migrants has doubled in the past
forty years and now amounts to around 200 million souls living outside their
places of birth. For receiving countries, migration—at once perceived as a social
challenge and an economic necessity—prompts difficult debates and questions.
Perhaps rather belatedly, the social sciences have recognized the
importance of these issues and a significant body of new literature has
accumulated in recent decades. The field is, however, intrinsically
multidisciplinary with contributions stemming from economics,
demography, human geography, law, sociology, political science,
and social anthropology. Migration also interweaves with other
important multidisciplinary fields such as gender studies,
labour-market studies, and cultural studies.
The sheer scale of the growth in migration research output—and the
breadth and complexity of the discipline—makes this new Major
Work from Routledge especially timely, and answers the urgent need
for a wide-ranging collection which provides easy access to the key
items of scholarly literature, material that is often inaccessible or
scattered throughout a variety of specialist journals and books. In five
volumes, Migration brings together the best and most influential
foundational and cutting-edge research on: theories of migration; patterns
of migration; the politics of migration; and the dynamics of migration.
The collection is supplemented with a full index, and includes a comprehensive
introduction, newly written by the editor, which places the collected material in
its historical and intellectual context. Migration is destined to be valued by
scholars, students, and researchers as a vital research resource.
Routledge
November 2009
234x156: 2,000pp
Set Hb: 978-0-415-47842-7
Routledge Major Works
Migration CRITICAL CONCEPTS IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES
VOLUME I
Theories
Theories
1.
G. Dorigo and W. Tobler, ‘Push-Pull Migration Laws’, Annals of the
Association of American Geographers, 1983, 73, 1, 1–17.
2.
A. Portes and J. Böröcz, ‘Contemporary Immigration: Theoretical
Perspectives on its Determinants and Modes of Incorporation’,
International Migration Review, 1989, 28, 4, 606–30.
3.
D. S. Massey et al., ‘Theories of International Migration: A Review and
Appraisal’, Population and Development Review, 1993, 19, 3, 431–66.
4.
J. Arango, ‘Explaining Migration: A Critical View’, International Social
Science Journal, 2000, 165, 283–96.
5.
M. Waters, ‘Sociology and the Study of Immigration’, American
Behavioral Scientist, 1999, 9, 42, 1264–8.
21. P. Martin, ‘Guest Worker Policies for the Twenty-First Century’,
New Community, 1997, 23, 4, 483–94.
22. S. Castles, ‘Guestworkers in Europe: A Resurrection?’, International
Migration Review, 2006, 40, 4, 741–66.
23. K. Koser and J. Salt, ‘The Geography of Highly Skilled International
Migration’, International Journal of Population Geography, 1997,
3, 285–303.
Refugees
24. A. Shacknove, ‘Who is a Refugee?’, Ethics, 1985, 95, 2, 274–84.
25. B. S. Chimni, ‘The Geo-Politics of Refugee Studies: A View from the
South’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 1998, 11, 4, 350–74.
26. R. Black, ‘Fifty Years of Refugee Studies: From Theory to Policy’,
International Migration Review, 2001, 35, 1, 57–78.
27. M. J. Gibney, ‘Liberal Democratic States and Responsibilities to
Refugees’, American Political Science Review, 1999, 93, 169–81.
Concepts
Miscellaneous Types
6.
28. J. Salt, ‘A Comparative Overview of International Trends and Types’,
International Migration Review, 1989, 23, 3, 431–56.
7.
8.
D. Gurak and F. Caces, ‘Migration Networks and the Shaping of
Migration Systems’, in Mary Kritz, Lin Lean Lim, and Hania Zlotnik
(eds.), International Migration Systems: A Global Approach (Clarendon
Press, 1992), pp. 150–76.
T. Faist, ‘The Crucial Meso-Level’, in Tomas Hammar et al. (eds.),
International Migration Immobility and Development: Multidisciplinary
Perspectives (Berg, 1997), pp. 187–217.
A. Wimmer and N. Glick Schiller, ‘Methodological Nationalism,
the Social Sciences and the Study of Migration’, International
Migration Review, 2003, 37, 3, 576–610.
Flows
9.
D. Thränhardt, ‘European Migration from East to West: Present
Patterns and Future Directions’, New Community, 1996, 22, 2, 227–42.
10. A. Adepoju, ‘Issues and Recent Trends in International Migration
in Sub-Saharan Africa’, International Social Science Journal, 2000,
52, 165, 383–94.
11. R. King and N. Mateos, ‘Towards a Diversity of Migratory Types and
Contexts in Southern Europe’, Studi Emigrazione, 2002, 39, 145, 5–25.
12. P. Fargues, ‘Arab Migration to Europe: Trends and Policies’,
International Migration Review, 2004, 38, 4, 1348–71.
13. M. M. B. Asis, ‘Recent Trends in International Migration in Asia and
the Pacific’, Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 2005, 20, 3, 15–38.
29. J.-P. Cassarino, ‘Theorising Return Migration: The Conceptual
Approach to Return Migrants Revisited’, International Journal on
Multicultural Societies, 2004, 6, 2, 253–79.
30. F. Duvell, ‘Irregular Migration: A Global Historical and Economic
Perspective’, Illegal Immigration in Europe (Palgrave, 2005),
pp. 14–39.
31. A. Findlay et al., ‘International Opportunities: Searching for the
Meaning of Student Migration’, Geographica Helvetica, 2005,
60, 3, 192–200.
32. A. M. Williams et al., ‘Tourism and International Retirement
Migration: New Forms of an Old Relationship in Southern Europe’,
Tourism Geographies, 2000, 2, 1, 28–49.
33. R. Black, ‘Environmental Refugees: Myth or Reality?’ (2001),
UNHCR Working Paper No. 34.
34. K. Zimmermann, ‘Ethnic German Migration Since 1989: Results and
Perspectives’ (1999), IZA Discussion Paper No. 50.
VOLUME III
Trends
Shifts
14. A. R. Zolberg, ‘The Next Waves: Migration Theory for a Changing
World’, International Migration Review, 1989, 23, 3, 403–30.
15. A. Portes, ‘Immigration Theory for a New Century: Some Problems
and Opportunities’, International Migration Review, 1997,
31, 4, 799–825.
16. S. Castles, ‘Globalization and Migration: Some Pressing Contradictions’,
International Social Science Journal, 1998, 156, 179–86.
17. S. Castles, ‘Twenty-First Century Migration as a Challenge to Sociology’,
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2007, 33, 3, 351–71.
VOLUME II
Types
Labour Migrants
Modes of Migration
35. R. Münz, ‘A Continent of Migration: European Mass Migration in the
Twentieth Century’, New Community, 1996, 22, 2, 201–26.
36. E. Kofman, ‘Female “Birds of Passage” a Decade Later: Gender and
Immigration in the European Union’, International Migration Review,
1999, 33, 126, 269–99.
37. J. Salt and J. Stein, ‘Migration as a Business: The Case of Trafficking’,
International Migration, 1997, 35, 4, 467–94.
38. F. Duvell, ‘Crossing the Fringes of Europe: Transit Migration in the
EU’s Neighbourhood’, COMPAS Working Paper 06-33.
Migration and Development
39. R. T. Appleyard, ‘Migration and Development: A Critical Relationship’,
Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 1992, 1, 1, 1–18.
18. S. Castles and G. Kosack, ‘The Function of Labour Immigration in
Western European Capitalism’, New Left Review, 1972, 73, 3–21.
40. J. Durand, E. E. Parrado, and D. S. Massey, ‘Migradollars and
Development: A Reconsideration of the Mexican Case’, International
Migration Review, 1996, 30, 2, 423–44.
19. M. Castells, ‘Immigrant Workers and Class Struggles in Advanced
Capitalism: The West European Experience’, Politics and Society, 1975,
5, 33–66.
41. P. Levitt, ‘Social Remittances: Migration Driven Local-Level Forms
of Cultural Diffusion’, International Migration Review, 1998,
32, 4, 926–48.
20. L. L. Lim and N. Oishi, ‘International Labor Migration of Asian
Women: Distinctive Characteristics and Policy Concerns’, Asian and
Pacific Migration Journal, 1996, 5, 1, 85–116.
42. N. Nyberg-Sørensen, N. Van Hear, and Poul Engberg-Pedersen,
‘The Migration-Development Nexus: Evidence and Policy Options’,
International Migration, 2002, 40, 5, 49–73.
Routledge Major Works
S
Transnationalism
43. N. Foner, ‘What’s New about Transnationalism? New York Immigrants
Today and at the Turn of the Century’, Diaspora, 1997, 6, 3, 355–75.
44. A. Portes et al., ‘The Study of Transnationalism: Pitfalls and Promise of an
Emergent Research Field’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1999, 22, 2, 217–37.
45. P. Pessar and S. Mahler, ‘Transnational Migration: Bringing Gender In’,
International Migration Review, 2003, 37, 3, 812–46.
46. J. Itzigsohn and S. Giorguli Saucedo, ‘Immigrant Incorporation and
Socio Cultural Transnationalism’, International Migration Review, 2002,
36, 3, 766–98.
47. L. E. Guarnizo, ‘The Economics of Transnational Living’, International
Migration Review, 2003, 37, 3, 666–99.
48. R. Smith, ‘How Durable and New is Transnational Life? Historical
Retrieval Though Local Comparison’, Diaspora, 2000, 9, 2, 203–25.
VOLUME IV
Policies
VOLUME V
Processes
Integration and Incorporation
65. P. Weil and J. Crowley, ‘Integration in Theory and Practice:
A Comparison of France and Britain’, West European Politics, 1994,
17, 2, 110–26.
66. J. DeWind and P. Kasinitz, ‘Everything Old is New Again? Processes
and Theories of Immigrant Incorporation’, International Migration
Review, 1997, 31, 4, 1096–111.
67. A. Zolberg and Litt Woon Long, ‘Why Islam is Like Spanish: Cultural
Incorporation in Europe and the United States’, Politics and Society,
1999, 27, 1, 5–38.
68. P. Kasinitz, J. Mollenkopf, and M. C. Waters, ‘Becoming
Americans/Becoming New Yorkers: Immigrant Incorporation in
a Majority Minority City’, in J. G. Reitz (ed.), Host Societies and
the Reception of Immigrants (Center of Immigration Studies,
University of California, 2003), pp. 73–90.
Understanding Migration Policies
Assimilation Debates
49. M. J. Miller, ‘Policy Ad-hocracy: The Paucity of Coordinated
Perspectives and Policies’, Annals of the American Academy of Political
and Social Science, 1986, 485, 64–75.
69. H. Gans, ‘Toward a Reconciliation of “Assimilation” and “Pluralism”:
The Interplay of Acculturation and Ethnic Retention’, International
Migration Review, 1997, 31, 4, 875–92.
50. G. Freeman, ‘Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic
Societies’, International Migration Review, 1995, 29, 4, 881–902.
70. R. Alba and V. Nee, ‘Rethinking Assimilation Theory for a New Era
of Immigration’, International Migration Review, 1997, 31, 826–74.
51. E. Meyers, ‘Theories of International Immigration Policy:
A Comparative Analysis’, International Migration Review, 2000,
34, 4, 1245–82.
71. R. Brubaker, ‘The Return of Assimilation? Changing Perspectives on
Immigration and its Sequels in France, Germany, and the United
States’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2001, 24, 4, 531–48.
52. E. Thielemann, ‘Does Policy Matter? On Government Attempts
at Controlling Unwanted Migration’ (2003), European Institute
Working Paper 2003-02.
Forced Migration and Refugee Policy
53. R. Sales, ‘The Deserving and the Undeserving? Refugees, Asylum
Seekers and Welfare in Britain’, Critical Social Policy, 2002,
22, 3, 456–78.
54. N. Van Hear, ‘Refugees in Diasporas: From Durable Solutions to
Transnational Relations’, Refuge, 2006, 12, 1, 9–15.
55. J. Crisp, ‘A New Asylum Paradigm? Globalization, Migration and the
Uncertain Future of the International Refugee Regime’, New Issues in
Refugee Research Working Papers (UNHCR, 2003).
International Migration and the State
56. R. W. Brubaker, ‘Immigration, Citizenship, and the Nation State in
France and Germany: A Comparative Historical Analysis’, International
Sociology, 1990, 5, 4, 397–407.
72. R. Rumbaut, ‘Assimilation and its Discontents’, in J. Stone and
R. Dennis (eds.), Race and Ethnicity: Comparative and Theoretical
Approaches (Blackwell, 2003), pp. 237–59.
The Second Generation
73. A. Portes and M. Zhou, ‘The New Second Generation: Segmented
Assimilation and its Variants Among Post 1965 Immigrant Youth’,
Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1993,
530, 74–98.
74. M. Zhou, ‘Segmented Assimilation: Issues, Controversies, and
Recent Research on the New Second Generation’, International
Migration Review, 1997, 31, 4, 975–1008.
75. M. Crul and H. Vermeulen, ‘The Second Generation in Europe’,
International Migration Review, 2003, 37, 4, 965–86.
76. R. Alba, ‘Bright vs. Blurred Boundaries: Second Generation
Assimilation and Exclusion in France, Germany, and the United
States’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2005, 28, 1, 20–49.
57. C. Joppke, ‘Immigration Challenges the Nation State’, Challenge to the
Nation-State (Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 5–48.
Immigration and Multiculturalism
58. D. Massey, ‘International Migration at the Dawn of the Twenty-First
Century: The Role of the State’, Population and Development Review,
1999, 25, 2, 303–22.
77. S. Castles, ‘The Australian Model of Immigration and Multiculturalism:
Is it Applicable to Europe?’, International Migration Review, 1992,
26, 2, 549–67.
59. E. Østergaard-Nielsen, ‘International Migration and Sending Countries:
Key Issues and Themes’, International Migration and Sending Countries
(Palgrave, 2003), pp. 3–32.
78. C. Joppke, ‘Multiculturalism and Immigration: A Comparison of the
United States, Germany and Great Britain’, Theory and Society, 1996,
25, 4, 449–500.
60. J. Hollifield, ‘The Emerging Migration State’, International Migration
Review, 2004, 38, 3, 885–912.
79. W. Kymlicka, ‘Immigration, Citizenship, Multiculturalism:
Exploring the Links’, in Sarah Spencer (ed.), The Politics of Immigration
(Blackwell, 2003), pp. 195–208.
Migration Management
61. M. Miller and P. Martin, ‘Prospects for Cooperative Management
of International Migration in the 21st Century’, Asian and Pacific
Migration Journal, 1996, 5, 2–3, 175–99.
62. A. Zolberg, ‘The Politics of Immigration Policy: An Externalist
Perspective’, American Behavioral Scientist, 1999, 42, 9, 1276–9.
63. W. A. Cornelius, ‘Death at the Border: Efficacy and Unintended
Consequences of US Immigration Control Policy’, Population and
Development Review, 2001, 27, 4, 661–85.
64. S. Castles, ‘Why Migration Policies Fail’, Ethnic and Racial Studies,
2004, 27, 2, 205–27.
MJWK0916