History 156 – World Civilization II – University of Saint Mary Spring Semester 2007 – Mulliken Instructor: Ken Mulliken Instructor’s Background: Starting in 1988, I have taught at Utah Valley State College, Brigham Young University, UMKC, and Park University. My doctoral work is in United States history. I started teaching at USM in 2003. Office Hours: Monday / Wednesday / Friday – 9:30 to 11:00 a.m. and Tuesday / Thursday – 8:30 to 11:00 a.m., in Xavier Hall Room 202. Contact Information: Office Phone – 913-758-6157 / Cell Phone – 816-616-8790 E-mail – MullikenK@stmary.edu / Alternate E-mail – Kennneth.Mulliken@pirate.park.edu Classroom: Xavier 210 Class Time: Monday / Wednesday / Friday 8:30 to 9:20 a.m. First Day of Class: Wednesday January 17th Last Day of Class: Friday May 4th Date of the Final Exam: Monday May 7th at 8:00 a.m. University of Saint Mary Mission Statement: The University of Saint Mary educates students of diverse backgrounds to realize their God-given potential and prepares them for value-centered lives and careers that contribute to the well being of our global society. University of Saint Mary Values Statement: The University of Saint Mary believes in the dignity of each person’s capacity to learn, to relate and to better our diverse world. These values include community, respect, justice, and excellence. University of Saint Mary Learning Goals: Participation in this course will advance University of Saint Mary goals by enabling students to engage in the following areas of investigation: inductive and deductive reasoning to model the natural and social world especially through but not limited to the humanities, the social sciences, the natural sciences, and the behavioral sciences; the values, histories, and interactions of social and political systems across global cultures, with emphasis on American democracy; understanding interconnections of humans and nature; ethical and moral dimensions of decisions and actions. General Learning Objective of Historical Study: By examining the social paradigms of the past, we can better understand the world, as we know it today, understand ourselves better, and make wise choices in the future. University Learning Outcomes (ULOs): The student will: 1. demonstrate ability of effective written and oral communication in a variety of settings, to a range of individuals and within groups and teams, using various modes. 2. demonstrate ability to formulate questions that reveal an intelligent curiosity about texts or concepts and to analyze questions with imagination and creativity. 3. demonstrate ability to apply qualitative analysis in a variety of disciplines and situations. 4. demonstrate ability to use, evaluate, and interpret complex information, solve complex problems, and understand complex systems. 5. demonstrate intellectual and emotional flexibility and adaptability to understand and shape lives within a culture of change. 6. demonstrate ability to evaluate information from disparate sources, to transform information into meaningful knowledge. 7. demonstrate intellectual honesty, responsibility and accountability in learning and life. Departmental Learning Outcomes (DLOs): The Department of History, Political Science and Global Studies at the University of Saint Mary strives to empower students to: 1. See themselves and their society from different times and places in order to develop a mature view of human nature and an informed perspective of their own country and its connection with a wider world. 2. Use their study of the past to participate knowledgeably in the affairs of the world around them. 3. Use essential analytical and research skills to understand, identify, and evaluate historical developments, movements, and trends. 4. Exhibit sensitivities to human values in their own and other cultural and religious traditions, and, in turn, establish values of their own. 5. Respect scientific and technological developments and recognize their impact on humankind. 6. Pursue responsible vocational preparation. 7. Promote the integration of faith, learning, and behavior through the examination of the past. Course Outcomes (COs): The student will: 1. demonstrate ability of effective written communication in essay format and other written assignments. 2. demonstrate ability of effective oral communication in a classroom setting. 3. demonstrate ability of effective oral communication in leading class discussion on assigned readings, both individually and in teams. 4. demonstrate ability to formulate questions that reveal an intelligent curiosity about texts or concepts and to analyze questions with imagination and creativity. 5. demonstrate ability to apply qualitative analysis to a wide variety of situations and issues in history. 6. demonstrate ability to use, evaluate, and interpret complex information, solve complex problems, and understand complex interrelationships. 7. demonstrate intellectual and emotional connectedness to the global community of human and nonhuman life. 8. demonstrate ability to evaluate information from disparate sources, to transform information into meaningful knowledge. 9. demonstrate intellectual honesty, responsibility and accountability in learning. 2 Course Description: This course is a survey from the Renaissance/Reformation era through World War II and the Cold War, including interaction with various nonwestern cultures. Overall themes emphasize analysis and comparative understanding of evolving patterns of individualism and democracy in Western Europe and the United States. This is a required course for secondary education history majors. Required Readings: Civilization: Past and Present Volume II (from 1300), 11th edition, edited by Brummett, et al., 2006. World Civilizations Since 1500, by Adler and Pouwels, et al., 2008. Reading Assignments: Make sure you are prepared to discuss the readings by the day we are scheduled to discuss them in class. Designated student discussion leaders will join the instructor in facilitating class discussions. Students will be notified in advance when they are designated to serve as student discussion leaders. Attendance Policy: Students are expected to attend every scheduled meeting of all courses in which they are enrolled and to be present for the full class period. Absenteeism and tardiness, regardless of cause, are a threat to academic achievement. Classes missed for legitimate reasons (e.g., illness, death in the family, work assignments, temporary military duty) may be excused at the determination of the instructor; however, ―excused‖ students absent from classes are responsible for all materials covered during the class period. The student is also subject to appropriate consequences, as described by instructor in the syllabus. A student who has four consecutive “unexcused” absences will be counseled and encouraged to withdraw from class. To comply with Federal regulations, instructors must keep a written record of attendance for every student. An incomplete will not be issued to a student who has unexcused or excessive absences recorded for the course.‖ More than two absences will result in a deduction of points from the student’s final grade. Starting with the third absence, students will be penalized twenty (20) points per absence. Sleeping in class will be counted as an absence. What to Expect from the Instructor: During the time we are together I will be well organized; on time to class; enthusiastic about the subject; prepared for class; respectful of student opinions; honest; as clear as possible in my explanations; receptive to all questions; and fair in grading and treatment of every student. I may not know the answer to every question, but if I do not know the answer, I will find the answer for you. What is Expected of Each Student: Students are expected to – Attend every class. Pay attention when the instructor is speaking. Pay attention when other students are speaking or when a video is playing. Prepare for class by reading the entirety of each assignment in advance. Participate in each class discussion. Ask questions when material or assignments are not clear. Turn off cellular phones before entering class. Be on time to class and do not disrupt class by attempting to leave early. Rattling papers and zipping backpacks at the end of the class period is a significant distraction and should be avoided. Students must avoid – Activities in class that are distracting such as filing or clipping fingernails. Using laptop computers for activities other than taking notes, including but not limited to checking e-mail or working on projects for other classes. Chewing tobacco in class. Being disruptive with food, drink, and gum in the classroom. Leaving trash in the classroom. Reading the newspaper, magazines, or outside texts while in class. Most importantly – Please accept responsibility for what you want out of the class. If there are any problems please talk to me about them; above all, please be honest and do your best. 3 Academic Honesty: Academic Honesty is required of all members of a learning community. Hence, the University of Saint Mary will not tolerate cheating or plagiarism on tests, examinations, papers or other course assignments. Students who engage in such dishonesty may be given failing grades or expelled from the university, at the discretion of the instructor and the Dean for Academic Affairs. Plagiarism—the appropriation or imitation of the language or ideas of another person and presenting them as one’s original work—sometimes occurs through carelessness or ignorance. Students who are uncertain about proper documentation of sources should consult the instructor. In the past, I have caught several students cheating and they all were severely penalized for it (ranging from failure for the class to expulsion from the university). Policy Regarding Late Submissions, Missed Tests, and Make Up Work: No late work will be accepted. If you are sick on a test or quiz day, please call me as soon as you are able at 913-758-6157 or 816-616-8790, or provide an authorized medical excuse. I am willing to work with students who experience a legitimate illness or extenuating circumstance. Policy Regarding Conflicting University-Sponsored Events: An official university release or pre-scheduled conflicting university-sponsored event (such as a sporting event) can be accommodated if I am notified far enough in advance. Such a release is a request to make up work, not an automatic free day. Honors In Course: Students wishing to take this class for ―honors in course‖ credit should speak with the instructor regarding requirements. Any combination of two ―honors in course,‖ or ―honors in field‖ are prerequisites for ―departmental honors.‖ Phi Alpha Theta: Students are encouraged to join Phi Alpha Theta, the national honor society in the discipline of history. Students who have twelve hours of history and meet the requisite grade point average are eligible for selection in their junior or senior year. Grading Policy: Grades are assigned on an impartial basis. I will never discriminate nor give preferential treatment to students on the basis of age, race, sex/gender, religion, sexual orientation, color, ethnic origin, weight, physical condition, Veteran status, collegiate sports activity, political or social affiliation. 600 total points will be possible during the semester. 100 points -- one mid-term exam (25 questions worth 2 points each and one essay worth 50 points) 50 points -attending class, participating in class discussions, maintaining a good attitude, putting forth a strong effort to learn, and fulfilling class expectations (These points start at zero and build with participation) 100 points -- four readings quizzes (each quiz will have five questions worth five points each) 100 points -- one five-page book report (on a book other than Elie Wiesel’s Night) 100 points -- one group oral presentation on a key figure or issue in world civilization 150 points -- one final examination (50 MC questions worth 2 points and one essay worth 50 points) 600 total points possible – the grading scale is as follows: 600-540 = A, 539-480 = B, 479-420 = C, 419-360 = D, Below 360 = F Book Quizzes (100 points): There will be four quizzes given during the semester over the required readings. Each quiz will have five questions worth five points each. Each question will have five multiple-choice options. During tests and quizzes students will be asked to remove or reverse baseball-style hats and remove sunglasses so the instructor can see all student eyes. This aligns with ULOs 4, 6, and 7. It aligns to DLO 3, and COs 6, 8, and 9. 4 Book Report (100 points): Write a 5-page book report. Books will be chosen by the student but must be preapproved with the instructor. The final draft will be due on Monday April 23rd. No late work is accepted for any reason, however, you may turn the paper in early. This aligns to ULOs 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7. This aligns to DLOs 1, and 3. This aligns to COs 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Questions: What is this book about? What are the major points or issues addressed? Is there a thesis? If so, what is it? Why did the author(s) write this book? Who was the intended audience? Did the book accomplish what the author(s) intended? What is the style or format, and are there any advantages or disadvantages to this style? Did the author’s background influence the book’s focus? Did you like or dislike the book? What did professional historians have to say about the book? What does the book teach us about history? Why was it suggested as a reading for this class? Requirements: As a resource guide please use Kate Turabian’s A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations. Include a cover page with your name, the book’s title, course number, and date submitted. Do not retype the cover page information on the first page of your work. Please use 11 or 12-point font, preferably in Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier New font, double-spaced, using standard margins. Include page numbers. More than 5 pages will be acceptable, but less than five full pages of work will not be acceptable. Please proofread, not just spell check. Multiple spelling errors or grammatical errors will result in a loss of up to 20 points, depending upon how distracting it is to the overall paper. Turn in either a paper copy or send an email copy (Word/Word Perfect formats) to MullikenK@stmary.edu. Students must include in their book report what scholarly peer-review journals wrote about the book at the time of its publication. These journals must be parenthetically referenced. Book reports must demonstrate a thorough and comprehensive understanding of the book and how it contributes to the broader historical understanding of World Civilization. Tests: (250 points) The two tests are designed to make sure that students consistently read the assignments, attend class, and participate in class discussions. Both the mid-term exam and final exam will consist of two sections: multiple choice and essay. Both the midterm exam and final exam have twenty-five questions with five possible answers, and the essay section will offer three or four possible essay topics of which students will write on one. Each multiple-choice question is worth two points on the midterm exam, and the essay is worth 50 points. Questions will be taken from lectures, class discussion, the readings, videos, etc. Essay responses on the exams will be expected to include a thesis, and specific supporting information from the lectures, readings, etc. During tests and quizzes students will be asked to remove or reverse baseball-style hats and remove sunglasses so the instructor can see all student eyes. This aligns with ULOs 4, 6, and 7. It aligns to DLO 3, and COs 6, 8, and 9. 5 Oral Presentations (100 Points): Each student must participate in a group PowerPoint presentation of 10-12 slides on the life and contribution of a key figure or issue in World Civilization. Groups will be about 5 students each. Student groups will determine topics themselves but must approve these with the instructor in advance of presentation. Although there is no dress code for class, students are expected to dress professionally on the day(s) they present orally in class. Students should expect to speak for 15-20 minutes. See the ―History Oral Presentation Rubric‖ at the end of this syllabus. This aligns to ULOs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. This aligns to DLO 3, and COs 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 9. Participation (50 points): There will be many multiple opportunities for students to participate in class discussion. Student preparation and participation is essential to the success of the class. Points in this category start at zero and are earned over the course of the semester. Students earn points for participation by clearly demonstrating in class that they have read the assigned reading material, that they have thought about the issues involved, and that they have made some conclusion about the subject. They can make comments about the readings or ask questions about material that is not perfectly clear. Students should volunteer their opinions and not wait to be called upon. Students can also ask questions about term paper topics, about the lectures, or some similar subject in an attempt to help the class better understand the issue or assignment. Points start at zero and build toward fifty. This aligns to ULOs 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7. This aligns to DLOs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7. Student Scoring Section: Students may keep score of their grade / attendance below. Dates of Absences – Quiz 1 – __________ out of 25 Quiz 2 – __________ out of 25 Quiz 3 – __________ out of 25 Quiz 4 – __________ out of 25 Midterm Exam – __________ out of 100 Oral Presentation – __________ out of 150 Book Report – __________ out of 100 Anticipated Final Exam Score – __________ out of 100 Anticipated Participation Grade – __________ out of 50 6 Schedule for History 156 – World Civilization II January 17 January 19 January 22 January 24 January 26 January 29 January 31 February 2 February 5 February 7 February 9 February 12 February 14 February 16 February 19 February 21 February 23 February 26 February 28 March 5 March 7 March 9 March 12 March 14 March 16 March 19 March 21 March 23 March 26 March 28 March 30 April 2 April 4 April 6 April 9 April 11 April 13 April 16 April 18 April 20 April 23 April 25 April 27 April 30 May 2 May 4 May 7 W– F– M– W– F– M– W– F– M– W– F– M– W– F– M– W– F– M– W– M– W– F– M– W– F– M– W– F– M– W– F– M– W– F– M– W– F– M– W– F– M– W– F– M– W– F– M– Introduction to World Civilization and each other. Assignment #1: email the instructor. Video – The Hajj Video – The Hajj Discussion of Chapter 12 (pages 347-368) Guest Lecturer (Read Chapter 14 pages 397-429) Discussion of Chapter 16 (pages 463-489) Guest Lecturer (Read Chapter 17 pages 491-524) Quiz #1 and Video – Master and Commander Video – Master and Commander Video – Master and Commander and discussion Discussion of Chapter 18 (pages 527-558) Discussion of Chapter 19 (pages 561-585) Lincoln-Douglas Debate (attendance required) No Class / Instructor at Kansas State Department of Education Meeting Video – Amistad Video – Amistad Video – Amistad and discussion Discussion of Chapter 22 (pages 643-670) Quiz #2 and Discussion of Chapter 23 (pages 673-704) Spring Break / No Classes Spring Break / No Classes Spring Break / No Classes Discussion of Chapter 26 (pages 751-793) Video – Gallipoli Video – Gallipoli Video – Gallipoli and discussion Pictionary Test Review Midterm Exam Discussion of Chapter 27 (pages 797-830) Discussion of Chapter 28 (pages 833-861) Discussion of Chapter 29 (pages 865-882) Quiz #3 and Discussion of Chapter 32 (pages 941-960) No Class / Department Trip to Washington, D.C. Easter Break / No Classes Discussion and In-Class Assignment for Elie Wiesel’s Night Discussion of Chapter 33 (pages 963-1001) Video – The Killings Fields Video – The Killings Fields Video – The Killings Fields and discussion Quiz #4 and Discussion of Chapter 35 (pages 1041-1071) BOOK REPORTS DUE In Service Day / No Classes PowerPoint Presentations PowerPoint Presentations PowerPoint Presentations Pictionary Test Review Final Exam at 8:00 a.m. in Xavier 210 7 Rubric for History Oral Presentations - Mulliken HI 156 World Civilization II, Spring 2007 Criteria Full Credit ¾ Credit Half Credit ¼ Credit No Credit Subject Knowledge (40 points) Organization (24points) Student demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration. Student presents information in logical, interesting sequence which engages the audience. Delivery, Eye Contact, and Elocution (24 points) Student maintains eye contact with audience, seldom returning to notes. Student uses an animated voice with correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear presentation. Graphics (12 points) Student’s graphics not only explain and reinforce screen text and presentation, but also demonstrate the student’s effort. Student is at ease with expected answers to all questions, but fails to elaborate. Student is comfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions. Student is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions. Student does not have grasp of information; student cannot answer questions about subject. Student presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow. Student maintains eye contact most of the time but frequently returns to notes. Student uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear presentation. Student's graphics explain and reinforce screen text and presentation. Student presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow. Audience has difficulty following presentation because student jumps around. Student spends approximately equal time maintaining eye contact and reading from notes. Student's voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Most audience members can hear presentation. Student's graphics relate to text and presentation. Student occasionally uses eye contact, but still reads most of report. Student's voice is low. Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation. Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information. Student reads all of report with no eye contact. Student mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for students in the back of class to hear. Student occasionally uses graphics that rarely support text and presentation. Student uses superfluous graphics or no graphics 8 BOOK REPORT RUBRIC – HI 117 World Civilization II – USM Spring 2007 THE SUPERIOR PAPER (A/A-) Thesis: Easily identifiable, plausible, original, thought-provoking, insightful, clear. Structure: Evident, understandable, appropriate for thesis. Excellent transitions from point to point. Paragraphs support solid topic sentences. Use of evidence: Primary source information used to buttress every point with at least one example. Examples support mini-thesis and fit within paragraph. Excellent integration of quoted material into sentences. Minimal internet sources. Analysis: Author clearly relates evidence to mini-thesis; analysis is fresh and exciting, posing new ways to think of the material. Logic and argumentation: All ideas in the paper flow logically; the argument is identifiable, reasonable, and sound. Author anticipates and successfully defuses counter-arguments; makes novel connections to outside material (from other parts of the class, or other classes) which illuminate thesis. Mechanics: Sentence structure, grammar, and diction excellent; correct use of punctuation and citation style; minimal to no spelling errors; no run-on or incomplete sentences; use of past tense with avoidance of secondperson pronouns, etc. THE GOOD PAPER (B+/B/B-) Thesis: Promising, but may be slightly unclear, or lacking in insight or originality. Structure: Generally clear and appropriate, though may wander occasionally. May have a few unclear transitions, or a few paragraphs without strong topic sentences. Use of evidence: Examples used to support most points. Some evidence does not support point, or may appear where inappropriate. Quotes well integrated into sentences. Analysis: Evidence often related to mini-thesis, though links perhaps not very clear. Logic and argumentation: Argument of paper is clear, usually flows logically and makes sense. Some evidence that counter-arguments acknowledged, though perhaps not addressed. Occasional insightful connections to outside material made. Mechanics: Sentence structure, grammar, and diction strong despite occasional lapses; punctuation and citation style often used correctly. Some (minor) spelling errors; may have one run-on sentence, sentence fragment, or comma splice 9 THE "NEEDS HELP" PAPER (C+/C/C-) Thesis: May be unclear (contain many vague terms), appear unoriginal, or offer relatively little that is new; provides little around which to structure the paper. Structure: Generally unclear, often wanders or jumps around. Few or weak transitions, many paragraphs without topic sentences. Use of evidence: Examples used to support some points. Points often lack supporting evidence, or evidence used where inappropriate (often because there may be no clear point). Quotes may be poorly integrated into sentences. Analysis: Quotes appear often without analysis relating them to mini-thesis (or there is a weak mini-thesis to support), or analysis offers nothing beyond the quote. Logic and argumentation: Logic may often fail, or argument may often be unclear. May not address counterarguments or make any outside connections. May contain logical contradictions. Mechanics: Problems in sentence structure, grammar, and diction (usually not major). Errors in punctuation, citation style, and spelling. May have several run-on sentences or comma splices. THE "TRULY NEEDY" PAPER (D+/D/D-) Thesis: Difficult to identify at all, may be bland restatement of obvious point. Structure: Unclear, often because thesis is weak or non-existent. Transitions confusing and unclear. Few topic sentences. Use of evidence: Very few or very weak examples. General failure to support statements, or evidence seems to support no statement. Quotes not integrated into sentences; "plopped in" in improper manner. Analysis: Very little or very weak attempt to relate evidence to argument; may be no identifiable argument, or no evidence to relate it to. Logic and argumentation: Ideas do not flow at all, usually because there is no argument to support. Simplistic view of topic; no effort to grasp possible alternative views. Many logical contradictions, or simply too incoherent to determine. Mechanics: Big problems in sentence structure, grammar, and diction. Frequent major errors in citation style, punctuation, and spelling. May have many run-on sentences and comma splices. THE FAILING PAPER Shows obviously minimal lack of effort or comprehension of the assignment. Very difficult to understand owing to major problems with mechanics, structure, and analysis. Has no identifiable thesis, or utterly incompetent thesis. 10 HI 156 World Civilization II – Spring 2007 The following are part of the Kansas State Department of Education (KSDE) Teacher Education Licensing Standards and Program Assessment Data. World Civilization II (HI 156), as taught at the University of Saint Mary, aligns its assignments and evaluations (such as exams) with KSDE History and Government Standard #2. Material covered in the course will align with these standards and students taking the HI 156, who intend to teach history and government on the secondary level in Kansas, are expected to develop and demonstrate mastery of the material. KSDE Standard 2 – The teacher of U.S. history and U.S. government, and world history has knowledge and understanding of significant individuals, groups, ideas, events, eras, and developments in the history of the world, and is able to utilize essential analytical and research skills. KSDE HISTORY & GOVERNMENT - KNOWLEDGE STANDARDS #2 2.6 The teacher understands the key events and individuals of the Renaissance, Reformation, and Catholic Reformation. 2.7 The teacher understands the major events, movements, and individuals of the Age of Absolutism and the Enlightenment. 2.8 The teacher understands the interaction and mutual impact among Europe, Africa, Asia, and the Americas during the Age of Exploration and Imperialism. 2.9 The teacher understands the Age of Revolutions and their impact from 1763 through 1848 including the American Revolution, French Revolution, and the Revolutions of 1820, 1830, and 1848. 2.10 The teacher understands the important individuals and movements of the nineteenth century in the fields of economics and science. 2.11 The teacher understands the rise of nationalism in the world community. 2.12 The teacher understands the origins, course, and consequences of World War I, World War II, and the Cold War and the consequences of the post-Cold War era and the struggle for human rights. KSDE HISTORY & GOVERNMENT – PERFORMANCE STANDARDS #2 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. The teacher is able to evaluate the intellectual soundness of historical writings in world history. The teacher is able to conduct historical research using primary sources and sound historical methodology. The teacher is able to construct assignments in world history that require students to use and evaluate primary and secondary sources. The teacher is able to design lessons that take into consideration the gender, racial, cultural, and religious sensitivities of students. The teacher is able to select readings and curriculum in world history that are developmentally appropriate for students. The teacher develops and implements effective research strategies and exhibits the results of this work using a variety of formats including but not limited to speaking, writing, and creating multimedia productions. The teacher engages in historical thinking skills including but not limited to analyzing primary and secondary historical materials for evidence of continuity and change and differentiating between and making comparisons of historical facts and historical interpretations. 11