1 The Division of Military Science Annual Assessment 2012-13 2 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT PACKAGE THE DIVISION OF MILITARY SCIENCE RESERVE OFFICERS’ TRAINING CORPS PROGRAM Foreword UAM’s Department of Military Science is a partner with UAPB’s Senior Reserve Officer Training Corps (SROTC) Program as outlined in the Memorandum of agreement between UAPB and UAM (Dated: October 2005). Mission Statement To recruit, retain, and develop quality Cadets in order to commission the future Leaders of the United States Army and to motivate young people to be better citizens for life-long service to their community. Vision Statement The Division of Military Science produces Leaders of character - transforming Scholar – Athlete – Leaders at UAM into commissioned officers prepared to lead small units in the U.S. Army, U.S. Army Reserve, or Army National Guard. These leaders, commissioned in the Reserve component, also apply their skills, knowledge, and experience towards civilian careers and local organizations. We are role models, on campus and in our communities, for moral and ethical conduct, professionalism, and selfless service. Department of Military Science Seven Army Values Loyalty: Bear true faith and allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, the Army, your unit, and other soldiers. Duty: Fulfill your obligations. Respect: Treat people as they should be treated. Selfless-Service: Put the welfare of the nation, the Army, and your subordinates before your own. Honor: Live up to the Army values. Integrity: Do what’s right, legally and morally. Personal Courage: Face fear, danger, or adversity (Physical or Moral). Guiding Questions 1. What are the student learning outcomes (SLOs) for your unit? How do you inform the public and other stakeholders (students, potential students, the community) about your SLOs? If your unit is accredited by an outside source, please attach the letter verifying your accreditation. 3 Note: Outcomes are specified in the Military Science and Leadership (MSL) level of study in which they are learned for MSLs I-II. MSLs III and IV are expected to exhibit mastery of all outcomes as they demonstrate desired qualities and attributes of an Army officer when performing cadet leadership duties within the battalion. Each MSL III and IV cadet are evaluated in multiple leadership positions during the year. 1) Leadership • Describe the relationship between leader character and competence (MSL I) • Identify the leader attributes and core leader competencies of the Army Leadership Requirements Model (MSL I) • Distinguish between leadership attributes and core leader competencies (MSL I) • Illustrate leader leading, developing, and achieving actions (MSL I) • Describe the three stages of team development (MSL II) • Illustrate significant traits and behaviors of historical military leaders (MSL II) • Explain the situational, transformational, and adaptive leadership theories and their relationship to the Army Leadership Requirements Model (MSL II) • Illustrate dimensions of transformational and situational leadership (MSL II) • Describe methods of assessing leadership styles (MSL II) • Explain your personal approach to leadership (MSL II) 2) Personal Development • Define standards for the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) (MSL I) • Write short-term and long-term goals to prepare for APFT (MSL I) • Define the basic elements of time and stress management (MSL I) • Identify benefits of resiliency awareness in an overall personal fitness program (MSL I) • Develop personal mission statement and goals (MSL I) • Explain the basic elements of Army communication (MSL I) • Deliver a formal information briefing (MSL II) • List the types and elements of interpersonal communication (MSL II) • Practice effective writing techniques in accordance with the Army standard for effective writing (MSL II) • Explain how to set goals and manage time at the team level (MSL II) • Develop team mission statement and goals (MSL II) • Explain ways to establish priorities and avoid distracters (MSL II) 3) Values and Ethics • Explain the Warrior Ethos (MSL I) • List and define the seven Army values (MSL I) • Explain how values impact leadership (MSL I) • Describe the importance of the Warrior Ethos for effective leadership (MSL I) • Explain the historical basis of Army values (MSL II) • Illustrate the four tenets of the Warrior Ethos (MSL II) • Explain the relationship Army Values, leadership, and the Army’s Equal Opportunity program (MSL II) 4) Officership • Explain the importance of being a model citizen as an Army officer (MSL I) 4 • React to passing colors, National music, and approaching officers (MSL I) • Describe basic heritage elements (salute, flags, rank structure, and uniforms) (MSL I) • Understand the impact of CULP on leader development (MSL I) • Explain the importance of personal development for officership (MSL I) • Describe rank, structure, duties, and traditions (MSL II) • Explain the Principles of War and Operations (MSL II) • Describe the Army Threat Awareness and Reporting Program, Threat Levels and Force Protection Conditions, and the National Terrorism Advisory System (MSL II) • Identify Army and government information resources regarding Terrorism (MSL II) 5) Tactics and Techniques • Work effectively in teams with fellow Cadets (MSL I) • Describe the components of a fire team and squad • Describe the individual movement techniques • Identify symbols and colors on a military map • Practice land navigation techniques (MSL II) • List the seven steps of problem solving (MSL II) • List the eight troop leading procedures (MSL II) • Distinguish between the different types of Army plans and orders (MSL II) • Demonstrate terrain analysis and route planning skills (MSL II) • Explain the five-paragraph format for an operations order (MSL II) • Describe the characteristics and techniques of defensive operations (MSL II) • Explain how squads and platoons plan for and conduct patrols (MSL II) • List and describe the five aspects of military terrain using (OAKOC) (MSL II) • Interpret an operation order (MSL II) Students, potential students, and the community can readily review the SLOs by viewing the ROTC Curriculum Map on the ROTC website at http://www.uamont.edu/ROTC/. Students will also review the SLOs for their particular course during the course overview on the first day of class. 2. Describe how your unit’s student learning outcomes fit into the mission of the University. The following excerpt from UAM's Mission is the core section that best describes how ROTC's SLOs fit into it. The University seeks to enhance and share knowledge to preserve and promote the intellectual content of society, and to educate people for critical thought. The University provides learning experiences which enable students to synthesize knowledge, communicate effectively, use knowledge and technology with intelligence and responsibility, and act creatively within their own and other cultures. In reference to the excerpt from UAM’s mission, all five SLOs are exhibited during all four years of instruction as cadets come to understand and apply military doctrine. 5 The enhancement and sharing of knowledge is exhibited is ongoing in the classroom and more so during labs: as After Action Reviews (AAR) are conducted following each training event and improved upon and as cadets at all leadership levels are required to disseminate plans prior to the conduct of the lab and information for upcoming events. SLO (enhancement and sharing of knowledge exhibited): 1-Leadership attributes and competencies are evaluated. 2-Cadets explain the elements of Army communication. 3-Cadets learn the Army Values and share examples of those values as observed in leaders. 4-Cadets learn of the impact Cultural Understanding and Language Program (CULP) has on leader development and about the Threat Awareness and Reporting Program (TARP) and of the requirement to share knowledge for it to be successful. 5-Learning and the attempt to master the many duties and responsibilities of each member of the squad, sharing multiple land navigation techniques, describing the planning process and analyzing the aspects of military terrain all pertain specifically to the enhancement and sharing of knowledge. The preservation and promotion of the intellectual content of society is mostly displayed during the MSL III and IV years of study as cadets read and evaluate vignettes designed to encourage the analysis of leaders’ tactical and ethical leadership decisions that had significant, strategic impacts in history. SLO (preserve and promote the intellectual content of society): 1-Cadets evaluate leaders in historical vignettes. 3-Cadets learn the impact one’s values have on leadership. 4-The discussion of cultural themes in history greatly shapes the cadets’ decision making process. 5-The use of materials from the Army Chief of Staff’s professional reading list promotes and lends to the preservation of society’s intellectual content. Cadets are educated for critical thought as they learn the requirement to inculcate the Army Values and Warrior Ethos and express this way of living in their cultural, ethical, and tactical leadership decisions. SLO (educate people for critical thought): 1-Their critical thought is expressed through development of cadets’ personal leadership style. 2-Cadets learn how to manage time, set goals, establish priorities and avoid distracters all for the sake of accomplishing a mission. 3-The requirement to live the Army Values and make ethical decisions displays a cadets ability to express critical thought. 4-A good officer will exhibit a good understanding of the implications of decisions made with respect to a culture in a given area of operation. 5-The analysis of terrain, weather, and a given mission are some of the best ways of evaluating one’s potential for critical thought. The ROTC Curriculum, at a glance, encompasses training and education in areas depicted below (Fig 1.). The following training areas of emphasis display a focus on each of the five SLOs. 6 Mastery in each training area will result in an officer capable of learning experiences desired, as stated in the first paragraph of the university’s mission. Fig 1. Additionally, the Seven Army Values, which serve as the cornerstone for our moral and ethical conduct, are inculcated into Cadets. They facilitate the professional development of an officer who is capable of operating in a variety of working environments and cultures (SLO 3.) Army ROTC is a four year program, divided into two parts – a Basic Course and an Advanced Course. The Basic Course is normally taken in a cadet’s freshman and sophomore years. The Advanced Course is usually taken during a cadet’s final two years of college and includes a five week Leader Development and Assessment Course that is attended in the summer, normally between a cadet’s junior and senior years. The Leader Development and Assessment Course provide cadets hands on training and the confidence that’s not learned in a classroom (SLOs 1 & 5.) Pre-commissioning Training Philosophy. Leadership is the process of influencing an individual or a team of people by providing them purpose, direction, and motivation to accomplish assigned missions and to improve the team for the future. The fundamental purpose of pre-commissioning training is officer leadership development; to teach cadets what an officer should be, know and do. The ROTC program seeks to identify and recruit the best cadets we can and then develop their values, attributes, skills and actions to meet standards for service as officers. The assessment and subsequent development of leadership comprise the main effort. Other skills and knowledge are important, but leadership development is our main effort (SLO 1.) The Army expects each officer to be responsible for his or her own development. Therefore, as they develop, cadets will be increasingly held responsible for actively seeking, acquiring and applying the skills, knowledge, attitudes and abilities required for a commission. 7 Fostering personal responsibility for professional development will be continually reinforced after entry into the Army (SLO 4.) 3. Provide an analysis of the student learning data from your unit. How is this data used as evidence of learning? Note: Student learning data specifically for UAM cadets is not available from the previous academic year, because data from UAM cadet information is compiled with that of UAPB and it is not readily extractible. Leadership Assessment Reports (Cadet Command Form 156-4A-R, Dated July 2009) (Appendix C) are used to evaluate performance of MS III students usually during their junior year. During their MS III year, cadets are afforded multiple opportunities to perform duties as a fire team leader, squad leader, or a platoon leader. They are graded on their ability to lead their element in accomplishing an assigned mission in a situational training exercise which is presented in the form of a tactical problem. The evaluation report determines the cadet’s character through exhibition of the seven Army Values, empathy, and the Warrior Ethos. The remainder of the report is dedicated to the evaluation of a cadet’s presence, intellectual capacity, leadership, development of others, and achievement through the use of seventeen leadership competencies which are evaluated as (E, S, or N) excellent, satisfactory, or needs improvement in performance/demonstration. To determine an overall rating of performance, a summary of the observation is recorded, area(s) to sustain and improve are noted, and the cadet is given an overall rating of E, S, or N. 4. Based on your analysis of student learning data in Question 3, include an explanation of what seems to be improving student learning and what should be revised. Note: A "contracted" cadet is one whom desires not to just take the ROTC course as a leadership class, but has made a commitment to become an Army Officer upon graduation. A contracted cadet takes on certain responsibilities not required of non-contracted cadets that are just taking the class. For instance, a contracted cadet is required to attend Physical Training (PT) three times a week and attend all Field Training Exercises (FTX) during the school year. U.S. Army Cadet Command, on behalf of U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (the U.S. Army Major Command responsible for all training) is responsible for the ROTC program curriculum and teaching methodologies. They highly encourage and advocate the use of the Experiential Learning Model to teach students. We find that the level of student participation and success is directly correlated with that student’s level of performance and academic progression. Students who are active in each week’s practical application laboratory, member of the Color Guard or Ranger Challenge teams, attend physical fitness training three days per week, and are attentive in classes tend to progress to the next level, contract, and do well at LDAC. This is evaluated through periodic assessments and evaluations using the Leader Development Program tools (leadership assessment report (blue card), cadet self assessment report (yellow card), developmental counseling) recurring physical fitness tests, land navigation, patrolling, and squad tactics evaluations. Students who do not put forth the effort perform poorly and generally 8 do not finish the program – either by choice or for failing to meet qualification standards to contract by their MS III year of study. An increase in the amount of relevant training that prepares cadets for LDAC resulted in improved scores as compared to previous years. During fall 2012 and spring 2013, the UAM/UAPB ROTC program conducted several field training exercises that included land navigation training at Camp Robinson, AR. This provided the cadets with additional training outside the UAM training area and a chance to conduct training in unfamiliar terrain. All cadets going to LDAC this year have passed land navigation and squad tactical exercises at training events and are expected to excel at LDAC. During the summer of 2012, four UAM students went to LDAC. Overall scores for LDAC that include land navigation and squad tactics testing were higher than in previous years. All cadets that were sent to LDAC graduated. In addition, all LDAC graduates have graduated or expected to graduate on schedule. Our current graduation rate for contracted cadets during the previous three years is 91%. Information regarding cadet evaluations at LDAC is not readily extractible from the cadet command information management system as all scores are consolidated under the UAPB program and would not accurately reflect the specific performance of UAM cadets. During Situational Training Exercises (STX), the mission of the faculty/cadre and senior cadets is to teach students how to accomplish a mission they are given. Faculty/cadre and senior cadets do this through instruction, coaching and mentoring. Tactical performance is evaluated on doctrinal principles and leadership is evaluated on leadership principles. However, cadre must assess the effects of external distracters on mission accomplishment. Cadre do not grade on technique or personal feelings, but strictly on the student application of what he has been taught and his ability to motivate others and accomplish the mission. Lessons are learned through detailed after action reviews and individual counseling of cadets on the blue cards (Appendix C). The blue card provides information on how well a cadet scored with regard to each of the seventeen Army leadership dimensions. In addition, the cadet receives an overall score of excellent, satisfactory or needs improvement. The instructor details what the cadet did well and needs to improve on. The instructor then counsels the cadet on his performance and has the cadet sign the card. Typically, by the time a cadet is in their junior year they are able to pass STX with a minimum overall score of satisfactory. The junior year is focused on improving their knowledge base and leadership skills in preparation for assessment at LDAC. Land Navigation is the process of locating unknown points using a map, protractor, compass, and having been given grid coordinates to a starting point and the points to be located. It is scored as pass or fail. In order to pass a cadet must locate 5 out of 8 points in the time frame allocated based off the distance of the points. This can range from two to four hours. If a student fails, the cadet is paired up with a senior cadet for remedial instruction and tested again during another lab or FTX. Cadre ensures the cadet has passed land navigation multiple times prior to sending them to LDAC. In between the cadet’s junior and senior year the cadet must demonstrate that they can pass land navigation testing at LDAC. If the cadet fails land navigation more than two times at LDAC, they will receive an overall needs improvement “N” 9 score. The cadet may be dismissed from ROTC or allowed to go to LDAC again the following year. This decision is made by a LDAC board who reviews the cadet’s information and scores. The chart below details the enrollment and participation in Military Science courses. Enrollment and contracting numbers by course and class status have been on par with other universities comparable to UAM. Considering the ultimate goal and mission of every ROTC Department is to commission Second Lieutenants into the U.S. Army, the Division of Military Science at UAM has met its mission. In fact, the UAM and UAPB ROTC partnership met their Army Cadet Command contracting mission last spring of 2012. Additionally, the UAPB/UAM partnership achieved its contracting mission in spring 2013. Since October 2005, UAM has successfully commissioned nine officers into the U.S. Army. For the 2012/2013 academic year we successfully commissioned three officers. This is the most for one academic year since the partnership. We project commissioning one cadet during fall of 2013 and two cadets during spring 2014. MSI MSII MSIII MSIV Contracted Total Cadets Fall 2008 2 11 3 2 2 20 Spring 2009 6 9 3 1 2 21 Fall 2009 11 2 6 1 5 25 Spring 2010 9 2 4 1 4 20 Fall 2010 15 4 4 2 6 25 Spring 2011 11 4 3 1 6 25 Fall 2011 9 5 4 3 8 21 Spring 2012 11 5 5 3 6 24 Fall 2012 9 1 3 4 7 17 Spring 2013 12 2 2 4 7 20 5. Other than course level/grades, describe/analyze other data and other sources of data whose results assist your unit to improve student learning. Note: Command Climate Surveys are typically for the commander (Professor of Military Science) and the Sexual Harassment/Equal Opportunity Officer only. Surveys are strictly confidential and are used to assess the moral and ethical climate of the unit and can help to raise flags in the event of any serious ethical deficiency in the organization. After Action Reviews (explained below) should be conducted following every training event. The compilation of all AARs throughout a given year for analysis is improbable as there are at least four training events per week; one for each PT session, and one for each lab. Since a goal of AARs is to improve every training event immediately following the event reviewed, there is an ongoing learning 10 process of how to better plan, prepare, and execute training events throughout the year. Although both are helpful in improving student learning, data from neither command climate surveys, nor AARs are available or provided for analysis. Ideally an end of semester and/or end of year AAR will be conducted and provided for this assessment, but none was either conducted, or provided for this year’s assessment. The Army uses a variety of tools and methods to assess unit decisions. A primary tool of Commanders is the Command Climate Survey. This provides a Commander with a tool for reviewing the climate of a unit. Unit “climate” factors - such as leadership, cohesion, morale, and the human relations environment - have a direct impact on the effectiveness of any military organization. The Command Climate Survey briefly addresses 22 climate areas: officer leadership, NCO leadership, immediate supervisor, leader accessibility, leader concern for families, leader concern for single Soldiers, unit cohesion, counseling, training, racist materials, sexually offensive materials, stress, training schedule, assistance for new members in units, respect, dealing with adversity, unit readiness, morale, discrimination, sexual harassment, sexual assault, and reporting discrimination and sexual harassment/assault incidents. Space is provided for comments on unit strengths and areas most needing improvement. The survey is designed as a self-contained, stand-alone tool for the commander. The unit will administer the survey, score or tally the results, and conduct their own analysis to assess the unit’s current climate. The survey results may provide indicators of strengths and issues in the unit. As a commander, one should use additional methods to assess the unit climate, such as observations, personal interviews, reports, and other unit data. A command climate survey for the UAPB/UAM ROTC department has recently been conducted during the fall 2012 semester. After Action Review. The most commonly used assessment tool the Army utilizes to gather, assess, and analyze information is the After Action Review (AAR). AARs are conducted after all collective training events and may be either formal or informal in their format and presentation. After Action Reviews (AARs) provide feedback to cadets as a team about the team performance and reinforces key teaching points. When properly facilitated, AARs allow participants at all levels of leadership and service to review and discover for themselves what happened during training and how to sustain good performance and improve poor performance. The AAR process maximizes cadet involvement in the analysis of training and promotes cadet leader development. Cadre use AARs on campus and train cadets to conduct them. In general, cadre and cadets conduct AARs as a part of all training events on campus and at LDAC/LTC. An AAR is not a critique. The facilitator does not simply recount his/her own assessment of the things the team did well or did poorly; instead, cadets who participated in the training event are the active participants in the process. Each participant is a source of feedback information from which to draw key lessons. The facilitator asks brief, open-ended questions to draw out this information. The facilitator plans and leads the AAR to incorporate the following aspects: A. Know the mission (training objectives) and the related doctrine. Training objectives/desired outcomes are the basis for discussion. B. Observe the event. The AAR facilitator is normally the Leadership Development Program (LDP) assessor for the cadet leader. The assessor must observe the cadet leader. This process is an active one, with an emphasis on monitoring the actions that distinguish the differences 11 between team and leader success and failure. The assessor must be present when orders or other guidance are issued, and must be alert to observe the actions and outcomes of the exercise. C. Maintain a written record of what happens. A sequential record of actions helps the AAR facilitator guide participants in recalling their actions, and results in a better review of the event by all concerned. D. Select a suitable site for the discussion of the event. A sand table and/or a site that overlooks the actual terrain are good visual aids. In tactical scenarios, the objective or the position of the opposing force usually make good AAR sites. E. If more than one assessor, the assessors should quickly discuss the exercise to improve their understanding of the actions and outcomes prior to starting the AAR. One of the assessors should take charge as the primary AAR facilitator. F. Review actions/outcomes; put them in rank order based on importance to the accomplishment of the training objectives or mission. The facilitator guides the team discussion to cover key points in the time available for the AAR. G. Conduct the AAR in steps. Gather and organize the cadet team (and the opposing force or other supporting personnel, if any). Ask cadets to re-state the training objectives or mission, and to discuss the plan and its execution. Prompt open, positive, candid discussion of team successes and mistakes, but avoid singling out individuals. Lead cadets to focus on what they learned rather than on whom or what to blame. Conclude with a summary of the main points. H. The following checklist is a useful guide for an AAR: - Organize the participants. - (Cadets) state the mission. - (Cadets) state the concept of the operation. - (Cadets) discuss execution, usually in chronological order from the “friendly” and “opposing force” perspectives. (1) What was the plan? (2) What happened? (3) Why did things happen? (4) Did the plan work? - Discuss alternatives for a better plan or execution for such a mission in the future. - Summarize the main points. 6. As a result of the review of your student learning data in previous questions, explain what efforts your unit will make to improve student learning over the next assessment 12 period. Be specific indicating when, how often, how much and by whom these improvements will take place. Cadet Evaluations and Mentor Program. ROTC cadre will continue to use the rating scheme and mentor program for MSIII and MSII cadets. The rating scheme provides an MSIV cadet to rate an MSIII cadet and an MSIII will rate an MSII cadet. All rating evaluations will be conducted on the cadet blue card (see Appendix C). Rating periods will be conducted every two weeks and then the rated cadet will change leadership positions and rater. Cadets will be rated during regular two week school periods, labs and field training exercises. The new rating system will allow cadets to gain some experience into the same leadership rating structure that they will experience at LDAC. In addition, it will help cadets focus on their leadership strengths and identify weaknesses. After the superior cadet counsels the subordinate cadet in a leadership position the blue card will be sent to cadre for review. The blue card is critical in identifying strong and weak leadership traits for any evaluated cadet. This information will help cadre identify which cadets need additional training. 7. What new tactics to improve student learning has your unit considered, experimented with, researched, reviewed or put into practice over the past year? During the next assessment period, the UAM ROTC Cadre will focus on cadets leading cadets and training. Cadets Leading Cadets: For the Fall 2013 semester, we plan to continue emphasis on “cadets leading cadets.” While a Cadet Chain of Command, or hierarchy of responsibility, has always been in place, it has not always been utilized to its full capability to enhance student learning. Our intent is to continue to place more responsibility on cadets as they progress through the program; making them responsible for teaching junior cadets what they have already learned. By the time a student is a senior in the program, they will be mirroring what their duties will be as a newly commissioned 2LT and platoon leader – but in a controlled, academic, learning environment where mistakes are part of the development process and not tied to potential mission failure or loss of life. This model of cadets leading cadets is integrated into the daily activities and operations of the department. Cadre/faculty provide teaching, coaching, mentoring to the seniors and juniors as they exercise their leadership over others. Cadre/faculty remain the technical experts and primary classroom instructors. They provide the checks and balances for the cadet leadership. Training: The quality of training continues to improve at UAPB and UAM. This was attributed to lessons learned from the previous two years and the cadre training that was received from LDAC. Several training exercises were conducted at the Camp Robinson Maneuver Training Center in North Little Rock, having a significant impact on cadet readiness for LDAC. During the 201112 academic year there were only two UAM MSIV cadets available to help train MSIII cadets for LDAC. During the 2012-13 academic year, we had three experienced MSIV cadets to help train the MSIII cadets. This increased leadership presence had a positive impact on overall cadet training for the new academic year. AARs will continue to improve cadet training for the land navigation and Situational Training Exercises (STX). The addition of new land navigation points at our UAM land navigation site, greatly improved land navigation training during labs. 13 Quality, realistic training that is properly planned, resourced, and evaluated will always improve the readiness, morale, and unit cohesion of a military organization. The improvement in preparation will be achieved by competent MS IV cadets receiving mentorship from cadre as to how to better conduct future training. More specifically, this is achieved through weekly cadet battalion leadership and staff teleconference training meetings during which all MS IVs in the program (UAPB and UAM) provide and review a PowerPoint slideshow detailing training events usually two weeks in the future and AAR comments from events complete. Improving the training during the 2013-14 academic year will have a positive impact on the number of contracted cadets, and eventually the graduation/commissioning numbers for the ROTC Department. Training for next year will closely match the training that was conducted this year. Cadre are considering transporting cadets from UAM to UAPB labs and vice versa during their labs to get more involvement with fellow cadets and participate in more training. UAMs labs are conducted on Tuesday afternoons from 1:10-3:00 p.m. and UAPB labs are from 2:00-4:00 p.m. on Thursday afternoons which allows for cadets from either school to the other to provide mentorship or participate in lab activities. Below is a list of training that was conducted during the year. Participating cadets are all contracted cadets, and non-contracted MS Is and MS IIs who desire to participate. Date 9/15/12 to 9/16/12 10/4/12 to 10/7/12 11/20/2012 11/17/12 to 11/18/12 11/29/2012 2/9/13 to 2/10/13 4/13/13 to 4/15/13 5/13/13 to 5/16/13 Training Chart for 2012-2013 Location Type of Training Approximate Hours of Training Number of UAM Cadets Camp Robinson, AR Field Training Exercise 28 10 Fort Sill , OK Ranger Challenge Competition 36 4 Lake DeGray, AR Field Training Exercise 12 8 Camp Robinson, AR Field Training Exercise 28 10 UAPB Combat Water Survival Training 3 4 Camp Robinson, AR Field Training Exercise 28 9 Camp Robinson, AR Field Training Exercise 36 8 Camp Robinson, AR Mini-Camp 42 2 Staff and Department Meetings. During the academic year the combined ROTC staff at UAM and the staff of its host school UAPB, meet twice a semester at UAPB. These meetings are held to synchronize recruiting, training, administrative, and logistics functions. Personnel issues of cadets are addressed in order to monitor the status of identified problems and best courses of action to resolve known issues. Past, current, and future training events are reviewed in order to best allocate resources and ensure training is properly planned. Training requirements for cadets scheduled for either LTC or LDAC are reviewed individually to insure each cadet is prepared prior to attending. Logistic issues are addressed to include cadet supply issues, course materials, transportation needs, and additional cadre requests. Recruiting and scholarship information is updated and briefed to all personnel. 8. How do you ensure shared responsibility for student learning and assessment among students, faculty and other stakeholders? Stakeholders are: ROTC alumni and veteran officers that understand the importance of a university that has the power to commission officers and desire to see the program sustained and strong Local National Guard and Reserve units that will receive a number of those we commission as platoon leaders and staff officers 14 UAPB cadre and staff Higher Headquarters leadership and staff (5th ROTC Brigade and Cadet Command) Students, faculty, and leadership within the higher chain of command all receive grades in one aspect or another. The students receive individual grades during each semester and upon the completion of LDAC, their total performance is combined for an individual ranking among every ROTC cadet in the nation following LDAC. Faculty whether active military, DA civilian, or contractor receive an individual evaluation report, which in part, is determined by the success of the program. Reserve component units receive some of our officers and are somewhat concerned with the level of support they provide as it correlates, to some degree, with the quality of officer they will receive. Alumni and veteran officers desire to perpetuate a positive reputation of ROTC commissioned officers and more specifically ones from their respective alma mater and visit the program, check on the level of support received and assess the level of discipline of cadets in the program. Cadre/faculty are available before and after hours to advise and help cadets that are enrolled in the program. Several of the UAM training exercises are conducted on the weekend. Physical training is conducted in the morning before classes. Students that have a course conflict with their mandatory military science classes are allowed to do an independent study with the instructor. This allows the student to maintain their contract and degree requirements. Below is a spreadsheet of the fall and spring semester classes for the current academic year. 15 MLSC 399V-01 Military Science Fall 2012 Courses Days & Times Room Arranged location SPECIAL TOPIC (Lecture) TBA Monticello MLSC 479V-01 INDEPENDENT STUDY (Lecture) TBA INDEPENDENT STUDY (Lecture) LEARN TO LEAD I (Lecture) LEARN TO LEAD I (Laboratory) TBA Tu 11:10AM 12:00PM Tu 1:10PM 3:00PM MLSC 2113-51 APP LEAD & MGMT I (Lecture) APP LEAD & MGMT I (Laboratory) TuTh 9:40AM 10:30AM Tu 1:10PM 3:00PM BBC 316 Classroom Aug 22, 2012 to Dec 14, 2012 Arranged location Monticello Aug 22, 2012 to Dec 14, 2012 MLSC 2113-52 APP LEAD & MGMT I (Laboratory) TBA Arranged location Monticello Aug 22, 2012 to Dec 14, 2012 MLSC 2206-01 LEADER TRAINING (LTC) (Lecture) TBA Arranged location Monticello Aug 22, 2012 to Dec 14, 2012 ADV LEAD & MGMT I (Lecture) ADV LEAD & MGMT I (Laboratory) ADV LEAD & MGMT I (Laboratory) TuTh 8:10AM 9:30AM Tu 1:10PM 3:10PM MoWe 9:10AM 10:00AM BBC 316 Classroom Aug 22, 2012 to Dec 14, 2012 BABIN BUSINESS CENTER Aug 22, 2012 to Dec 14, 2012 Arranged location Monticello Aug 22, 2012 to Dec 14, 2012 MLSC 4314-01 ADV LEAD & MGMT I (Laboratory) LEADERSHIP SEM I (Lecture) MoWe 9:10AM 10:00AM TuTh 12:00AM 12:00AM Arranged location Monticello Arranged location Monticello MLSC 4314-51 LEADERSHIP SEM I (Laboratory) TBA Arranged location Monticello Class MLSC 479V-02 MLSC 1012-01 MLSC 1012-51 MLSC 2113-01 MLSC 3214-01 MLSC 3214-51 MLSC 3214-52 MLSC 3214-53 Class Title Class Dates Aug 22, 2012 to Dec 14, 2012 Arranged location Monticello Aug 22, 2012 to Dec 14, 2012 Arranged location Monticello Aug 22, 2012 to Dec 14, 2012 BBC 316 Classroom Aug 22, 2012 to Dec 14, 2012 BBC 316 Classroom Aug 22, 2012 to Dec 14, 2012 Aug 22, 2012 to Dec 14, 2012 Aug 22, 2012 to Dec 14, 2012 Aug 22, 2012 to Dec 14, 2012 16 MLSC 399V-01 Military Science Spring 2013 Courses Days & Times Room Arranged location SPECIAL TOPIC (Lecture) TBA Monticello MLSC 479V-01 INDEPENDENT STUDY (Lecture) TBA Arranged location Monticello MLSC 1022-01 LEARN TO LEAD II (Lecture) Tu 11:10AM 12:00PM BBC 316 Classroom Jan 9, 2013 to May 7, 2013 MLSC 1022-51 LEARN TO LEAD II (Laboratory) Tu 1:10PM 3:00PM Arranged location Monticello MLSC 2123-01 APP LEAD & MGMT II (Lecture) TuTh 9:40AM 11:00AM BBC 316 Classroom Jan 9, 2013 to May 7, 2013 MLSC 2123-51 APP LEAD & MGMT II (Laboratory) Tu 1:10PM 3:00PM Arranged location Monticello MLSC 3224-01 ADV LEAD & MGMT II (Lecture) TuTh 8:10AM 9:30AM BBC 316 Classroom Jan 9, 2013 to May 7, 2013 MLSC 3224-51 ADV LEAD & MGMT II (Laboratory) Tu 1:10PM 3:00PM Arranged location Monticello Jan 9, 2013 to May 7, 2013 MLSC 4324-01 LEADERSHIP SEM II (Lecture) TuTh 12:00AM 12:00AM Arranged location Monticello Jan 9, 2013 to May 7, 2013 MLSC 4324-51 LEADERSHIP SEM II (Laboratory) TBA Arranged location Monticello Jan 9, 2013 to May 7, 2013 Class Class Title Class Dates Jan 9, 2013 to May 7, 2013 Jan 9, 2013 to May 7, 2013 Jan 9, 2013 to May 7, 2013 Jan 9, 2013 to May 7, 2013 9. Describe and provide evidence of efforts your unit is making to recruit/retain/graduate students in your unit/at the University. Training. The most significant action that the ROTC Cadre are taking to retain students is to improve the quality of training and increase the amount of time cadets train and interact with the instructors. Many ROTC programs conduct two to four Field Training Exercises per year. The UAM/UAPB program conducted a total of five FTXs during the school year, and we also provided a final training opportunity geared toward the preparation of MS IIIs going to LDAC, called Mini-Camp. This camp is conducted immediately following completion of the spring semester. Mini-Camp is not required training, it is strictly voluntary but it allows our cadets to take advantage of training in an immersed military setting for five continuous days that better prepares them for LDAC. This training has had a positive impact on cadet readiness and LDAC success. Below is the training chart for this academic year. 17 Date 9/15/12 to 9/16/12 10/4/12 to 10/7/12 11/20/2012 11/17/12 to 11/18/12 11/29/2012 2/9/13 to 2/10/13 4/13/13 to 4/15/13 5/13/13 to 5/16/13 Training Chart for 2012-2013 Location Type of Training Approximate Hours of Training Number of UAM Cadets Camp Robinson, AR Field Training Exercise 28 10 Fort Sill , OK Ranger Challenge Competition 36 4 Lake DeGray, AR Field Training Exercise 12 8 Camp Robinson, AR Field Training Exercise 28 10 UAPB Combat Water Survival Training 3 4 Camp Robinson, AR Field Training Exercise 28 9 Camp Robinson, AR Field Training Exercise 36 8 Camp Robinson, AR Mini-Camp 42 2 Counseling. All contracted cadets are counseled at least once a semester on a developmental counseling form (see Appendix B). Semester counseling includes the following components: attendance, G.P.A., contracting paperwork, Army Physical Fitness Test, military bearing and overall semester grade. In addition, cadets are counseled during the semester if they fail or come close to failing any of the above components. This process provides immediate feedback to the cadets on any deficiencies and ensures they are prepared as a cadet and student. Mentoring. A key ingredient in any successful military organization and especially training units like ROTC is an effective mentoring program. The ROTC structure facilitates mentorship. Advanced course cadets MS IIIs and especially MS IVs work extensively with basic course MS Is and MS IIs. These experienced cadets share knowledge of military tactics and techniques, and offer guidance and assistance to the underclassmen. The mentoring helps not only in adjusting to college life, but also in adjusting to military culture. During the 2012-13 academic year the senior cadets were in charge of several training events and urged to step up and lead the underclassmen. MS IIIs and MS IVs shared their experiences during prior training at field training exercises, LTC, and LDAC. The implementation of an effective mentoring program for underclassmen (MS Is and MS IIs) utilizing senior cadets and ROTC cadre improved retention in the ROTC program as more cadets were enrolled in the course each semester. Lastly, freshmen are encouraged by ROTC faculty and senior cadets to attend tutoring for any course they need help in. Recruiting: Recruiting of qualified students to develop into cadets and Officers is essential for the success of a Military Science Program. During the 2012 and 2013 academic year, UAM and UAPB ROTC cadre recruited from the following areas: local high schools, on campus, local National Guard Units and Reserve Units. During the spring semester of 2012 our department held recruiting events at the following high schools: Warren, Monticello High and Drew Central High. Our full time recruiter at UAPB held additional recruiting events at the high schools listed below. Recruiting efforts at UAM will continue to focus primarily in three areas; recruiting of quality high school students, prior military service members (National Guard/Reservists) who are already attending college, and current UAM students who may develop an interest in Military Science while on campus. Our recruiting efforts with local high schools will focus on the benefits of the ROTC four year scholarships and the benefits of the Army in general. High school presentations will increase awareness of the ROTC Program and raise student interests. In fall of 2013, the UAM ROTC Military Science department partnered with the UAM Business department to create a minor in leadership. This minor consists of the first two years of military 18 science classes and the last two years are a combination of management and/or communications classes. This minor creates a new opportunity to recruit students with and desiring to develop leadership skills into the ROTC program. ROTC Cadre will recruit qualified Soldiers in local National Guard Units and Reserve Units who are attending college and seeking a degree. The increased financial incentives for the guardsman/reservists to participate in ROTC including the GI Bill Kicker of $350 per month, cadet pay during drills, and the Guaranteed Reserve Forces Duty Scholarship are key recruiting tools our staff will communicate to National Guard units in the UAM area of influence. Also, we will encourage our cadets to participate in the Simultaneous Membership Program (SMP) at local National Guard and Reserve units. The SMP allow cadets to drill with National Guard or Reserve units and receive on the job training as an officer, while still participating in ROTC. This program is a win-win for the cadet and the Guard/Reserve units. The cadet receives cadet pay at drill, mentorship by an experienced officer, and on the job training. The guard/reserve unit gains a Soldier, and potentially a future leader. Lastly, our staff will actively recruit students already on campus who may wish to enter the ROTC program through attendance of the Leaders Training Course conducted at Fort Knox Kentucky each summer. This 28 day course allows sophomores and juniors the chance to enter directly into the Advanced Course of ROTC skipping the first two years of Basic Course. Below is a timeline of recruiting operations for academic year 2012 and 2013. ACTIVITY Mills High School Star City college fair Pine Bluff High School White Hall High School Arkadelphia High School North Little Rock High School Morrilton High School Memphis High School Little Rock School District college fair Watson Chapel High School Dallas High Schools Memphis Jamboree Watson Chapel High School McGhee College Fair Pulaski Tech College and Arkansas Baptist College Sylvan Hills High and North Little Rock High School Memphis High School DATE 18-Sep-12 0900-1300 18-Sep-12 20-Sep-12 21-Sep-12 24-Sep-12 25-Sep-12 26-Sep-12 28-Sep-12 2-Oct-12 3-Oct-12 11-12 Oct 12 23-Oct-12 31-Oct-12 1500-1700 1000-1300 1000-1400 0930-1400 0900-1500 0600-1400 0600-1400 1800-2100 0900-1200 0900-1600 0900- 1500 0900-1600 8-Nov-12 0900-1600 0900-1600 13-Feb-13 0900-1600 14-Feb-13 18-Feb-13 0900-1600 Times 19 Youth Motivational Task Force (YMTF), North Little Rock Warren High School Trezvant High School South Delta High School 0900-1600 25-26 Feb 13 4-Apr-13 0900-1600 10-May-13 0900-1600 15-May-13 0900-1600 20 Appendix A Syllabus TU & TH Class 8:10 AM to 9:30 AM / Lab TU 1:10 PM to 3:00 PM Instructor CPT Len E. Blaylock III Assistant Professor of Military Science 870.460.1702 / blaylock@uamont.edu Office Hours and Appointments Office Hours are (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday from 9:30 AM to 12:00 PM) I will meet with any of you to discuss assignments, issues, or concerns. My schedule is generally flexible and I will schedule a specific time to meet with you beyond office hours, if necessary. Prerequisites: MS I Course Course Description This is an academically challenging course were you will study, practice, and apply the fundamentals of Army leadership, Officership, Army values and ethics, personal development, and small unit tactics at the team and squad level. At the conclusion of this course, you will be capable of planning, coordinating, navigating, motivating and leading a team or squad in the execution of a tactical mission during a classroom PE, a Leadership Lab, or during a Situational Training Exercise (STX) in a field environment. Successful completion of this course will help prepare you for success at the ROTC Leader Development and Assessment Course (LDAC) which you will attend next summer at Fort Lewis, WA. This course includes reading assignments, homework assignments, small group assignments, briefings, case studies, and practical exercises, a mid-term exam, and a final exam. You will receive systematic and specific feedback on your leader attributes values and core leader competencies from your instructor and other ROTC cadre and MS IV Cadets who will evaluate you using the ROTC Leader Development Program (LDP) model. Learning Objectives The overall objective of this course is to integrate the principles and practices of effective leadership, military operations and personal development in order to adequately prepare you for the summer Leader Development and Assessment Course (LDAC). This course has specific learning objectives for the five tracks listed below. Leadership Explain the Leadership Development Program (LDP) evaluation cycle Write a self evaluation of leader actions taken during Leadership Labs 21 Values and Ethics Observe the Warrior Ethos in fellow Cadets/cadre or when presented with a current or historical vignette or case study Embody the Warrior Ethos in Leadership Labs and cadet interactions Personal Development Define standards for the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) Write short-term and long-term goals to prepare for APFT Describe the factors of Suicide Prevention Deliver on or more of the four types of Military briefings Officership Apply the Composite Risk Management process to the orders process Apply the fundamentals of Drill and Ceremony to squad formations Tactics and Techniques Apply troop leading procedures to accomplish team and squad operations Apply map reading, land navigation and terrain analysis to team and squad operations Apply military decision making to solve problems Apply fundamentals of Army Operations to small unit operations Pass the CWST MSL 301 Course Requirements Reading Student Text: MSL 301, Tactical Leadership, Pearson Custom Publishing, 2008 Selected readings available online at: http://www.usapa.army.mil o Leadership Development Program Handbook, Jul 2008 o Field Manual 6-22, Army Leadership, Oct 06 o Field Manual 3-21.8, The Infantry Rifle Platoon and Squad, Mar 07 o Field Manual 3-0, Operations, Feb 08 o Field Manual 21-20, Physical Fitness Training, Oct 98 o ARTEP 7-1, Warrior Battle Drills, Jul 06 o ARTEP 7-8, Battle Drills for the Infantry Platoon and Squad, Feb 02 o Student Handout (SH) 21-76, Ranger Handbook, Jul 06 o Selected books and articles as determined by professor 22 Class participation You are expected to participate actively in learning through critical reflection, inquiry, dialogue, and group interactions. This includes participating in class discussion, sharing personal perspectives and experiences related to principles discussed in class or reading, working with fellow students to engage in class exercises, and leading lab exercises. Quizzes Quizzes will be given throughout the semester to assess your progress in learning the principles and practices related to the course material. Mid-Term Exam A mid-term exam will be given to assess your knowledge achieved during the first half of the semester. Final Exam A cumulative final exam will be given to assess your knowledge achieved throughout the course of the semester. APFT As a future officer, you are expected to set the example for physical fitness according to Army regulations. You will be required to take a diagnostic APFT at the beginning of the fall semester and a for-record APFT at the end of the semester. The higher of the two APFTs will be used for 10% of your final grade. Contracted Cadets are required to participate in all ROTC activities as stated in their contract. Students auditing this class or not yet contracted are encouraged but not required to participate in ROTC activities outside of the classroom. Combat Water Survival Test This is a requirement to commission. Failure to pass will result in you being enrolled in an ROTC-funded swimming improvement class until you can successfully complete the CWST. Final Paper 1. Reflecting on your own experiences during this course, write a three to five page essay (typed and double-spaced) on your personal leadership growth using three or more of the Attributes, and Core Leader Competencies from the Leadership Requirements Model. 2. Reflecting on your own experiences during this course, write a three to five page essay, (typed and double-spaced) describing the relationship between the Orders Process the Troop Leading Procedures. 3. Reflecting on your own experiences during this course, write a three to five page essay, (typed and double-spaced) comparing and contrasting the offense with the defense using at least two characteristics from each. 23 4. Reflecting on the feedback you received from your blue card evaluations, write a three to five page personal development plan that you can implement during your spring semester, MSL 302 course. Your paper will outline your plan to sustain your excellent ratings and what actions you will take or implement to improve your satisfactory and needs improvement ratings you received. 5. Write a 5-paragraph OPORD given an OPORD from higher. Skills Presentation 1. Briefing Skills: Present a five minute information brief on a topic selected by the student and approved by the instructor. 2. Critical Thinking and Adaptability Skills: Given a sand table, a short STX OPORD by the instructor, and ten minutes preparation time, develop and brief a five-minute oral OPORD using the sand table. Term Project 1. Maintain a weekly Reflective Journal to turn in at the end of the semester for review and grading by the instructor. Entries should reflect on the good or bad leader attributes and core competencies that you have observed of others each week. Your reflections can be on anyone on or off campus and for any team, class, event or activity that you participated in that week. Comparing and contrasting leader attributes and core competencies of different people, events and organizations are encouraged. 2. Write a term paper, ten pages or more, (typed and double-spaced) where you compare and contrast the organizational leadership between two or more clubs, sport teams, organizations or extracurricular activity you actively participated throughout the semester, of which one must be your Cadet or Cadre ROTC Battalion that. Evaluation and Grading APFT 10% Class Participation* 30% Quiz Grades 10% Mid-Term Exam 10% Leadership Essay 5% Skills Presentation 5% Term Project 10% Final Exam (LDAC Readiness Assessment)20% NOTE: *Contracted Cadets are expected to participate in all ROTC activities in and outside the classroom. The following grading scale will be used based on 100 points possible. 90-100 A 24 80-89 B 70-79 C 60-69 D < 59 F Every attempt will be made to offer adequate written assessments in explaining evaluations. All late papers and assignments will receive a 10% reduction in grade. Course Design This course was designed to be student-centric with the onus of learning on the student, but facilitated by the instructor. Army Officers are expected to be life-long learners who take responsibility and personal initiative for their learning. You must properly conduct your pre-class assignments in order to come to class with a foundation of knowledge on the subject to be taught by your instructor. Doing so will allow your instructor to spend the majority of the class time on specific areas that are least understood from the preclass assignment rather than your instructor re-teaching the subject from scratch. Your instructor has a wealth of experience and knowledge to share in the classroom—do your homework so your instructor can spend more time sharing his personal knowledge and experiences with your class. Class will be conducted in an interactive manner with ample opportunities for small group discussions and practical exercises. Everyone will be responsible for contributing to the success of the learning experience. Uniforms and Appearance You are expected to wear ACUs (Army Combat Uniform) to all classes and adhere to Army Regulation 670-1 with regard to uniforms and appearance. Upon entrance of the ROTC building being a Government operated facility no Cadet is authorized to wear a tongue ring. No male Cadet is authorized to wear any type of ear piercing. While in ACU’s no male or female are authorized to wear earrings at all. You being a Senior Cadet will make on the spot corrections at all times to your peers and subordinates. Collaboration You are encouraged to work together with your fellow MS III Cadets and seek guidance and help from your instructor, MS IV Cadets and other ROTC cadre. Students with disabilities It is the policy of the University of Arkansas at Monticello to accommodate individuals with disabilities pursuant to federal law and the University’s commitment to equal educational opportunities. It is the responsibility of the student to inform the instructor of any necessary accommodations at the beginning of the course. Any student requiring 25 accommodations should contact the Office of Special Student Services located in Harris Hall Room 120; phone 870 460-1026; TDD 870 460-1626; Fax 870 460-1926. Further Reading Bennis, W. G., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper & Row Publishers. Bennis, W. G. (2003). On becoming a leader. New York: Basic Books. Bennis, W. G., & Thomas, R. J. (2002). Geeks & Geezers: How era, values, and defining moments shape leaders. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row Publishers. Gardner, J. W. (1990). On leadership. New York: The Free Press. Headquarters, Department of the Army, Field Manual 1 (2005). The Army. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Headquarters, Department of the Army, Field Manual 6-22 (2006). Army leadership. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Wong, L. (2004). Developing adaptive leaders: The crucible experience of Operation Iraqi Freedom. Carlisle Barracks, PA: Strategic Studies Institute. Wong, L. (2002). Stifling innovation: Developing tomorrow’s leaders today. Carlisle Barracks, PA: Strategic Studies Institute. This is a very general list. Cadre members are encouraged to contribute references they believe to be beneficial. For a more complete listing of leadership references see Human Dimensions of Strategic Leadership, published by the U.S. Army War College Library (December, 2002) or The U. S. Army Chief of Staff’s Professional Reading List, United States Army Center for Military History (CMH Pub 105-5-1). Overview of Class Sessions Session 301-1a ROTC & Course Overview Session 301-1b Team Dynamics Session 301-1c ROTC Leadership Development Program Session 301-2a Army Briefing Techniques 26 Session 301-2b Warrior Ethos overview Session 301-2c Intro to Composite Risk Assessment (CRM) Session 301-3a Map Reading I: Session 301-3b Map Reading II: Session 301-3c Terrain Analysis Session 301-4a Introduction to Army Problem Solving Session 301-4b Troop Leading Procedure Overview Session 301-4c Combat Orders Session 301-5a Application of Troop Leading Procedures Session 301-5b Squad Tactical Movement Session 301-5c Squad Tactics: Patrolling Session 301-6a Battle Drills Session 301-6b Squad Tactics: Offensive Operations Session 301-6c Squad Tactics: Offensive Operations PE Session 301-7a Mid-Term Exam Session 301-7b Squad Tactics: Reconnaissance Session 301-7c Squad Tactics: Reconnaissance PE Session 301-8a Squad Tactics: Ambush Session 301-8b Squad Tactics: Ambush PE Session 301-8c Squad Tactics: Attack Session 301-9a Squad Tactics: Attack PE Session 301-9b Squad Tasks in the Defense Session 301-9c Squad Tactics: Defense PE Session 301-10a Squad Tactics: Capstone Practical Application (PE I) Session 301-10b Squad Tactics: Capstone Practical Application (PE II) Session 301-10c The Army Leader Session 301-11a Leadership Peer Evaluations Session 301-11b Leadership & Culture Session 301-11c Leadership PE Session 301-12a Suicide Prevention Session 301-12b Course Review Session 301-12c Final Exam 27 General Lab Schedule LAB 1 Drill and Ceremony LAB 2 Land Navigation I LAB 3 Individual & Squad Movement Techniques LAB 4 Land Navigation II LAB 5 Employ Hand Grenades LAB 6 Battle Drills LAB 7 Squad Tactics I LAB 8 Squad Tactics II LAB 9 Squad Tactics III LAB 10 Combat Water Survival Training (CWST) LAB 11 Conduct Inspections (PCCs, PCI, & Field Craft) LAB 12 Commander’s Time Other ROTC Events (27 AUG) Last Day to register or add classes (2 SEP) Labor Day Holiday (14 SEP) UAM vs. Southeastern Oklahoma State University @ 1800 (Color Guard) / Parent Appreciation Day (Recruiting Event) (21 SEP) UAM vs. Northwestern Oklahoma State University @ 1800 (Color Guard) (21-22 SEP) Lake Degray FTX with focus on Land Navigation Training (24 SEP) Suicide Prevention Safety Stand Down (Monticello, AR) (5 OCT) (11-12 OCT) UAM vs. Arkansas Tech University @ 1500 (Color Guard) Ranger Challenge @ Camp Robinson, AR (19 OCT) UAM vs. Lindenwood University @ 1500 (Color Guard) (26 OCT) UAM vs. Southern Nazarene University @ 1500 (Color Guard Homecoming) (30 OCT) Last day to drop class with a “W” (2 NOV) UAM vs. Henderson State University @ 1500 (Color Guard) (4-15 NOV) Pre-registration for Spring 2014 classes (11 NOV) Veterans Day Ceremony (All contracted cadets mandatory) (16-17 NOV) Camp Robinson FTX and Land Navigation Training (21 NOV) CWST 28 (27 NOV-1 DEC) Thanksgiving Break (6 DEC) Last day of classes (9-13 DEC) Final Exams Appendix B, DA Form 4856 Developmental Counseling Form (Front) 29 30 Appendix B, DA Form 4856 Developmental Counseling Form (Reverse) 31 Appendix C, LDP Forms (Blue Card Front) (Blue Card Back) 32 (Yellow Card Front) (Yellow Card Back) 33 34 35 Cadet Evaluation Report (Front) 36 Cadet Evaluation Report (Reverse)