Google Search Results for RSL Estimates of Elevator Systems and Components A. For the Purpose of Environmental Product Declarations & Life Cycle (Cost) Assessments Estimated Elevator System Service Life [y] 25 20 – 30 30 Reference / URL Year Geographical Scope ThyssenKrupp Elevator Americas: Making Lifetime Costs and Materials Clear for our Customers 2013 US KONE: EPDs for KONE MonoSpace 2009 US KONE: EPD for KONE EcoSpace 2009 US KONE: EPD for KONE MiniSpace 2008 BE KONE: EPD for KONE MonoSpace 500 n/a BE Low Resource consumption buildings and constructions by use of LCA in design and decision making - LoRe-LCA: Report on scenarios for LCA in constructions, Table 5 adapted from German Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Development (2011) 2011 DE Stanford University Land and Buildings: Guidelines for Life Cycle Cost Analysis 2005 US Schindler Corporate Citizenship Report: The Ecological Leverage Effect – n/a Life Cycle Assessment n/a 1999 LCA Schindler 100T and Schindler 3100 EU in: Proceedings of The 6th International Conference on Life Cycle Management in Gothenburg 2013 2011 EU MAC PUAR S.A. (MP Lifts): EPD for MP 1310 GO! ES 2011 B. For the Purpose of Real Estate & Facility Management, Financial Accounting and Other Estimated Elevator System Service Life [y] 15 20 ≥ 20 25 Reference / URL Year Geographical Scope Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers (CIBSE): Guide M, Indicative life expectancy for building services plant, equipment and sys- 2008 tems UK Northwestern University: Useful live table to estimate the rate calculations for future equipment purchases n/a US Lerch Bates: What is a realistic average ‘useful life’ estimate for passenger lifts? 2013 EU Governmental Accounting Standards Board’s (GASB): Estimating useful lives for capital assets 2002 US J & N Realty, Inc.: Estimating Useful Life for Capital Assets n/a US Facilitiesnet.com: Elevators 2002 US New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal Office of Rent Administration: Useful Life Schedule for Major Capital Improve- 2013 US Estimated Elevator System Service Life [y] Reference / URL Year Geographical Scope The New York Times: Real Estate, A New Elevator: The Nuts and Bolts 2008 US Criterium Engineers: Elevator Engineering Advisor 2009 US Kompetenzzentrum der Initiative „Kostengünstig qualitätsbewusst Bauen“ im Bundesinstitut für Bau, Stadt und Raumforschung (BBSR) im Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung (BBR): Info Blatt Nr 4.2, Lebensdauer von Bauteilen und Bauteilschichten 2009 DE The Chartered Accountant: Rates of depreciation on various assets involved in mass rapid transport system 2007 IN ments 20 – 25 ≥ 20 – 25 20 – 35 ᴓ: 30 30 C. No elevator-related RSL information was found in the following pertinent standards: ISO 15686-2: Buildings and constructed assets – Service life planning – Part 2: Service life prediction procedures; Cited from LoRe-LCA Report on scenarios for LCA in constructions: ”A method of estimation that has not otherwise surfaced through the case studies is that established by the international standard ISO 15686 (The standard includes a total of 11 substandards, [...]. Most significant in estimating lifetime for building components is the procedure that is outlined in ISO 15686-2 [...] that describes a standard method for establishing a Reference Service Life of a Component (RSLC) [...] In a Swedish case study included in LoRe-LCA deliverable 4.3, 4 large material suppliers were asked whether or not they used procedures connected to this standard, and they did not.” CSA Standard 5478-95: Guideline on Durability in Buildings, ASTM E2018 – 08: Standard Guide for Property Condition Assessments: Baseline Property Condition Assessment Process D. For the Purpose of Real Estate & Facility Management, Financial Accounting and Other Estimated Elevator Component Service Life [y] Reference “[…] All major OTIS India: Safety for All, Passport to Quality, Product Development Procomponents cess (PDP) […] 20-year life expectancy between overhauls […]” Year Geographical Scope n/a IN Estimated Elevator Component Service Life [y] Reference Year Geographical Scope See screenshot FannieMae: Instructions for the PNA Property Evaluator, Appendix F – below Estimated Useful Life Tables 2013 US See screenshot Georgia Department of Community Affairs (DCA): 2011 Architectural below Manual, Expected Useful Life Table 2011 US Estimated Elevator Component Service Life [y] Reference See screenshot APPA Institute (The Association of Higher Education Facilities Officers): below Body of Knowledge (BOK), SECTION II-B: BUILDING SYSTEMS, Elevator Systems Year Geographical Scope 2009 US E. Expected Service Life of Key Building Elements of LEED-NC 2009 Credits & Categories Reference Green Building Information Gateway (GBIG): Development of a systemtatic Framework for Durability Analysis of Green Building Strategies Year Geographical Scope 2013 US „The service life of LEED-NC rating system components varies from 13 to 34 years, with an average of 23 years; 44% of LEED-NC credits are expected to perform throughout the full lifetime of the building (50+ years); More than half of the credits (54%) are expected to have a service life of more than 30 years; 72% of credits are expected to perform for 25 years or more. More than three quarters of the credits (78%) are expected to perform for at least 20 years; Only 4 credits (7%) are expected to perform for less than 10 years. These include contractSbased policies, such as green power purchasing, or commissioning after occupancy.“