CHAPTER 5 Introduction to Risk, Return, and the Historical Record INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 5-2 Interest Rate Determinants • Supply – Households • Demand – Businesses • Government’s Net Supply and/or Demand – Federal Reserve Actions INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-3 Real and Nominal Rates of Interest Let R = nominal rate, • Nominal interest r = real rate and rate: Growth rate of i = inflation rate. Then: your money • Real interest rate: Growth rate of your purchasing power (how many Big Macs can I buy with my money?) r R i 1 R 1 r 1 i Solve: R i r 1 i INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-4 Equilibrium Real Rate of Interest • Determined by: –Supply –Demand –Government actions –Expected rate of inflation INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-5 Figure 5.1 - Real Rate of Interest Equilibrium INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-6 Equilibrium Nominal Rate of Interest • As the inflation rate increases, investors will demand higher nominal rates of return • If E(i) denotes current expectations of inflation, then we get the Fisher Equation: • Nominal rate = real rate + expected inflation R r E (i ) INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-7 Taxes and the Real Rate of Interest • Tax liabilities are based on nominal income – Given a tax rate (t) and nominal interest rate (R), the real after-tax rate of return is: R1 t i r i 1 t i r 1 t i t after tax inflation -adjusted • As intuition suggests, the after-tax, real rate of return falls as the inflation rate rises. INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-8 Rates of Return for Different Holding Periods Zero Coupon Bond Par = $100 T = maturity P = price rf(T) = total risk free return 100 P 1 rf T 100 rf T 1 P INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-9 Example 5.2 Time Does Matter: Use Annualized Rates of Return INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-10 Equation 5.7 EAR • Time matters → use EAR to annualize • Effective Annual Rate definition: percentage increase in funds invested over a 1-year horizon 1 rf T 1 EAR T 1 EAR 1 rf T 1 T INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-11 Equation 5.8 APR • Annual Percentage Rate (APR): annualizing using simple interest 1 APR T 1 EAR T 1 EAR APR T 1 T INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5.00 5-12 End Value with APR=5.0% 4.50 End Value with EAR=5.0% Investment End Value 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0 5 10 15 INVESTMENTS 20 30 | BODIE,25KANE, MARCUS (years) 5-13 Table 5.1 APR vs. EAR INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-14 Continuous Compounding • Frequency of compounding matters • At the limit to (compounding time)→0: 1 EAR e rcc INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5.00 5-15 End Value with APR=5.0% End Value with EAR=5.0% End Value with Rcc=5.0% 4.50 Investment End Value 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0 5 10 15 INVESTMENTS 20 30 | BODIE,25KANE, MARCUS (years) How to derive Rcc Let r=rate and x=compounding time → T N * x N T / x End Value 1 r * x 1 r * x 1 r * x N compounding N times lim1 r * x S lim e Make x very small. Then use A=eln(A) lim e N x 0 T ln 1 r * x x x 0 lim e x 0 1 T r 1 r * x 1 ln 1 r * x N x 0 Looks like 0/0. Use de l’Hôpital lim e Substitute N=T/x d T ln 1 r * x dx d x dx x 0 e rT Checks: r=0 →End Value=1 Q.E.D. INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS T=0 →End Value=1 5-17 Table 5.2 Statistics for T-Bill Rates, Inflation Rates and Real Rates, 1926-2009 INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-18 Bills and Inflation, 1926-2009 • Moderate inflation can offset most of the nominal gains on low-risk investments. • One dollar invested in T-bills from1926–2009 grew to $20.52, but with a real value of only $1.69. • Negative correlation between real rate and inflation rate means the nominal rate responds less than 1:1 to changes in expected inflation. INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-19 Figure 5.3 Interest Rates and Inflation, 1926-2009 INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-20 Risk and Risk Premiums Rates of Return: Single Period P 1 P 0 D1 HPR P0 HPR = Holding Period Return P0 = Beginning price P1 = Ending price D1 = Dividend during period one INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-21 Rates of Return: Single Period Example Ending Price = Beginning Price = Dividend = 110 100 4 HPR = (110 - 100 + 4 )/ (100) = 14% INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-22 Expected Return and Standard Deviation Expected (or mean) returns E (r ) p ( s )r ( s ) s p(s) = probability of a state r(s) = return if a state occurs s = state INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-23 Scenario Returns: Example State Excellent Good Poor Crash Prob. of State 0.25 0.45 0.25 0.05 r in State 0.3100 0.1400 -0.0675 -0.5200 E(r) = (0.25)(0.31) + (0.45)(0.14) + (0.25)(-0.0675) + (0.05)(-0.52) = 0.0976 = 9.76% (think of a probability-weighted avg) NOTE: use decimals instead of percentages to be safe INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-24 Variance and Standard Deviation Variance (VAR): p( s) r ( s) E (r ) 2 2 s Standard Deviation (STD): STD 2 INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-25 Scenario VAR and STD • Example VAR calculation: σ2 = 0.25(0.31 - 0.0976)2 + 0.45(0.14 - 0.0976)2 + 0.25(-0.0675 - 0.0976)2 + 0.05(-0.52 - 0.0976)2 = = 0.038 • Example STD calculation: 0.038 0.1949 INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-26 Time Series Analysis of Past Rates of Return The Arithmetic Average of historical rate of return as an estimator of the expected rate of return n 1 n E (r ) p ( s )r s r s n s 1 s 1 INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-27 Geometric Average Return TVn (1 r1 )(1 r2 )...(1 rn ) TV = Terminal Value of the Investment Solve for a rate g that, if compounded n times, gives you the same TV TV 1 g g TV n 1/ n 1 g = geometric average rate of return INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-28 Geometric Variance and Standard Deviation Formulas Recall the definition of variance p( s) r ( s) E (r ) 2 2 s Estimated Variance = expected value of squared deviations (from the mean) n 2 1 ˆ r s r n s 1 2 INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-29 Geometric Variance and Standard Deviation Formulas • Using the estimated ravg instead of the real E(r) introduces a bias: – we already used the n observations to estimate ravg – we really have only (n-1) independent observations – correct by multiplying by n/(n-1) • When eliminating the bias, Variance and Standard Deviation become*: n 2 1 r s r ˆ n 1 j 1 * More at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unbiased_estimation_of_standard_deviation INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-30 The Reward-to-Volatility (Sharpe) Ratio • Sharpe Ratio for Portfolios: Risk Premium SD of Excess Returns INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-31 The Normal Distribution • Investment management math is easier when returns are normal – Standard deviation is a good measure of risk when returns are symmetric – If security returns are symmetric, portfolio returns will be, too – Assuming Normality, future scenarios can be estimated using just mean and standard deviation INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-32 Figure 5.4 The Normal Distribution INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-33 Normality and Risk Measures • What if excess returns are not normally distributed? – Standard deviation is no longer a complete measure of risk – Sharpe ratio is not a complete measure of portfolio performance – Need to consider skew and kurtosis INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-34 Skew and Kurtosis this is zero for symmetric distributions 3 R R skew average 3 ˆ R R 4 kurtosis average 3 4 ˆ this equals 3 for a Normal distribution INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-35 Figure 5.5A Normal and Skewed Distributions INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-36 Figure 5.5B Normal and Fat-Tailed Distributions (mean = 0.1, SD =0.2) INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-37 Value at Risk (VaR) • A measure of loss most frequently associated with extreme negative returns • VaR is the quantile of a distribution below which lies q% of the possible values of that distribution – The 5% VaR, commonly estimated in practice, is the return at the 5th percentile when returns are sorted from high to low. Also referred to as 95%-ile (depends on perspective) INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-38 Normal Distribution and VaR 2.5 Percentile 2 1.5 1 VaR 0.5 0 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 5-39 Expected Shortfall (ES) • a.k.a. Conditional Tail Expectation (CTE) • More conservative measure of downside risk than VaR: – VaR takes the highest return from the worst cases – Real life distributions are asymmetric and have fat tails – ES takes an average return of the worst cases INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS Normal Distribution, VaR, and Expected Shortfall 5-40 2.5 The area is the percentile 2 1.5 1 VaR Expected Shortfall 0.5 0 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 5-41 Lower Partial Standard Deviation (LPSD) and the Sortino Ratio • Issues with real life returns: – Need to look at negative returns separately to account for asymmetry and fat tails – Need to consider excess returns: deviations of returns from the risk-free rate. • LPSD: similar to usual standard deviation, but uses only negative deviations from rf • Sortino Ratio replaces Sharpe Ratio INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-42 A game with a coin Let’s play a game: flip a (non-fair) coin, and receive $1 if heads • Assume Pr[Heads]= p (for example p=50%) Q. What is the game’s expected outcome? Q. What is the Variance? Q. What is the St.Dev? INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-43 A game with two coins Let’s play a game: flip 2 fair coins, and receive $1 for each head Q. What is the portfolio expected return? Q. What is the portfolio Variance? Q. What is the portfolio St.Dev? INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-44 A lot more coins Let’s play a game: flip 30 fair coins, and receive $1 for each head. Q. What is the portfolio expected return? Q. What is the portfolio Variance? Q. What is the portfolio St.Dev? INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-45 A Portfolio of 2 stocks • Portfolio = 0.5 * A + 0.5 * B • A: rA = 0.08 StDevA = 0.1 • B: rB = 0.10 StDevB = 0.1 Q. What is the portfolio expected return? Q. What is the portfolio Variance? Q. What is the portfolio Standard Deviation? INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-46 A Portfolio of 3 stocks • Portfolio = wA * A + wB * B + wC * C Q. What is the portfolio expected return? Q. What is the portfolio Variance? Q. What is the portfolio Standard Deviation? Q. What is if you have N stocks? INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-47 1926-2009 S (A) (B) (D) (C) (E) 30% (A) 50% (B) 20% (D) INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-48 Historic Returns on Risky Portfolios • Returns appear approximately normally distributed • Returns are lower over the most recent half of the period (1986-2009) • SD for small stocks became smaller; SD for long-term bonds got bigger • Better diversified portfolios have higher Sharpe Ratios • Negative skew INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-49 Figure 5.7 Nominal and Real Equity Returns Around the World, 1900-2000 INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-50 Figure 5.8 Standard Deviations of Real Equity and Bond Returns Around the World, 1900-2000 INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-51 Figure 5.9 Probability of Investment Outcomes After 25 Years with a Lognormal Distribution INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-52 Terminal Value with Continuous Compounding • When the continuously compounded rate of return on an asset is normally distributed, the effective rate of return will be lognormally distributed. Remember: E Geom. Avg E Arithm. Avg 1 / 2 so m g 1 / 2 2 2 • The Terminal Value will then be: 1 EAR T e g 1 / 2 2 e T Tg T / 2 2 INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-53 Figure 5.10 Annually Compounded, 25-Year HPRs INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-54 Figure 5.11 Annually Compounded, 25-Year HPRs INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS 5-55 Figure 5.12 Wealth Indices of Selected Outcomes of Large Stock Portfolios and the Average T-bill Portfolio INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS